| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Krusty" |
| Date: |
04 Dec 2004 10:41:24 PM |
| Object: |
We Need A "Black Jack" Pershing In Iraq |
Between 1899 and 1903, American Army General John J "Black Jack" Pershing
was assigned to the Philippines in Northern Mindanao during the Moro
campaign. The Moro's were muslim terrorists.
Pershing captured 50 Muslim Moro fighters, had them dig a mass grave, and
had 2 pigs slaughtered in front of them. Soldiers dipped their bullets in
the pig blood, executed 49 of the fighters, put them in the pit, covered
them with pig innards,and buried them. Then he let the 50th fighter go.
There wasn't another Muslim related terrorist incident in the Phillipines
for over 42 years.
Lest the libbydims immediately start their hideous, tiresome squawling about
how Pershing must have been a rightard "racist", they should read about how
he got his nickname. http://tinyurl.com/6m6qz
.
|
|
| User: "Eric Root" |
|
| Title: Re: We Need A "Black Jack" Pershing In Iraq |
05 Dec 2004 11:14:28 AM |
|
|
Krusty wrote:
Between 1899 and 1903, American Army General John J "Black Jack" Pershing
was assigned to the Philippines in Northern Mindanao during the Moro
campaign. The Moro's were muslim terrorists.
Pershing captured 50 Muslim Moro fighters, had them dig a mass grave, and
had 2 pigs slaughtered in front of them. Soldiers dipped their bullets in
the pig blood, executed 49 of the fighters, put them in the pit, covered
them with pig innards,and buried them. Then he let the 50th fighter go.
There wasn't another Muslim related terrorist incident in the Phillipines
for over 42 years.
Lest the libbydims immediately start their hideous, tiresome squawling about
how Pershing must have been a rightard "racist", they should read about how
he got his nickname. http://tinyurl.com/6m6qz
I don't think it would work, let alone meet any sort of Geneva
convention standards. In the Phillipines, the Moros were just one group
off in a corner, with most of the population non-Muslim. In Iraq most
of our allies and "swing voters" are Muslim also, and to do something
like that would outrage most of them. Atrocities are best left to the
bad guys. In fact, it is one thing that makes them bad.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gregorio Roper" |
|
| Title: Re: We Need A "Black Jack" Pershing In Iraq |
05 Dec 2004 07:17:46 PM |
|
|
Eric Root wrote:
Atrocities are best left to the
bad guys. In fact, it is one thing that makes them bad.
Good idea! I guess there are some people who whish they had heard of
this idea much sooner.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David Johnston" |
|
| Title: Re: We Need A "Black Jack" Pershing In Iraq |
05 Dec 2004 11:33:18 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 22:41:24 -0600, "Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyAss.fool>
wrote:
Between 1899 and 1903, American Army General John J "Black Jack" Pershing
was assigned to the Philippines in Northern Mindanao during the Moro
campaign. The Moro's were muslim terrorists.
Only if the American revolutionaries were terrorists for attacking the
British during their war of independance. The Moro attacks were
usually on military men.
Pershing captured 50 Muslim Moro fighters, had them dig a mass grave, and
had 2 pigs slaughtered in front of them. Soldiers dipped their bullets in
the pig blood, executed 49 of the fighters, put them in the pit, covered
them with pig innards,and buried them. Then he let the 50th fighter go.
There wasn't another Muslim related terrorist incident in the Phillipines
for over 42 years.
A gigantic pile of pigshit. The practice of using the fear of
post-mortem contamination by pigs to discourage Moro attacks was
originated by Col Alexander "the Pig" Rodgers, and while it did
encourage the Moros to attack in other places, the fighting continued
for years as Rodgers was replaced by Bliss and Bliss by Pershing until
1913 when Pershing won the battle of Bud Bagsak in a surprise attack
where 500 Moros fought to the death. Even then, fighting continued
until 1917 under Frank Carpenter, the first civil governer in the
Phillipines, when American forces fought 1500 Moros in Mindanao in
their last dissident encampment.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: We Need A "Black Jack" Pershing In Iraq |
05 Dec 2004 05:24:10 PM |
|
|
Tiptoeing around Our Problems
By Dr. William Pierce
"We've been talking about the very dangerous situation in the Middle
East
recently, just because so much is happening there, and undoubtedly
we'll
be talking about it much more in the future. For that reason I want to
make very clear what my motives and sympathies are, lest I lead anyone
astray and be thought a hypocrite for doing so.
First, regarding Palestine: although my sympathies definitely lie with
the Palestinians rather than with the Jews, it is not horror at what
the
Jews are doing to the Palestinians that motivates me. What motivates
me
is horror that my country is being used by the Jews in their war
against
the Palestinians. If America were not involved at all in the Middle
East
I still would sympathize with the Palestinians and I would wish that
they could be successful in driving the Jews into the sea and
annihilating the abomination that is Israel, but that conflict between
Jews and Palestinians would not be a major concern for me. At least,
my
concern there would be dwarfed by my concern for problems more
directly
involving my own people in America and in Europe and in southern
Africa.
Even now, with money and weapons being supplied by America and used to
slaughter Palestinians, my concern is much less with monsters like
Ariel
Sharon who are doing the slaughtering than it is with the filthy
creatures among my own people in America who are collaborating with
Jews
here to keep the weapons and money flowing to Sharon -- and are ready
to
do whatever else the Jews require of them here or abroad.
So when I tell you about Jews in occupied Palestine shooting
Palestinian
children, and disapproval and anger are evident in my voice, what I
really am angry about is that the American people, my people, are
being
used for this murderous activity. I am angry that America's whole
foreign policy has been perverted to serve Jewish interests at the
expense of American interests. I am angry that America's political
system has been perverted to ensure that we always have so-called
"leaders," whether Democrat or Republican, who are dependent on the
Jewish media or Jewish money or both for their election and
consequently
will do the bidding of the Jews. I am angry that our whole government
is
riddled with Jews -- Jews in our Defense Department, Jews in our State
Department, Jews in our Immigration and Naturalization Service, Jews
in
our Justice Department, Jews in the President's speech-writing staff
--
who really set the policies of our government behind the scenes, while
the politicians are out front in the spotlight making speeches and
kissing babies -- and doing as they're told by the Jews behind the
scenes.
Did you know that it was a Jewish speechwriter, David Frum, who put
the
phrase "axis of evil" in George Bush's mouth to justify America's
ongoing war against Israel's enemies? Did you know that a clique of
Jews
in the Defense Department and among George Bush's foreign policy
advisers are the people actually running the so-called "war on terror"
in Afghanistan: a war that they intend to expand to Iraq and any other
Middle Eastern country that gets uppity, in order to make that part of
the world safe for Israel at American expense? Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld is a front man for his nominal subordinates, Deputy
Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and Deputy Undersecretary of
Defense
for Policy Douglas Feith; and George Bush's official foreign policy
adviser, Condoleezza Rice, helps him meet his Black quota for the
Cabinet, but it is the Jew Richard Perle, chairman of Bush's Defense
Policy Board, who gives him his foreign policy directives.
As I've said on more than one occasion, George Bush is a feckless
nincompoop who couldn't come up with a defense policy or a foreign
policy on his own if he had to -- which is why he's President. The
real
policymakers behind the scenes certainly don't want a man in the White
House who has ideas of his own, because those ideas might conflict
with
theirs.
And it is nothing but empty sophistry to make a distinction between
Jews
in Israel, such as Ariel Sharon and Simon Peres, and the Jews in Mr.
Bush's administration formulating his policies or the Jews controlling
our mass media. They all are Jews, and that's what really matters.
There are many knowledgeable Americans besides me who think that it's
not a good thing to have Jews using America to advance Israel's
interests at the expense of America's interests. They know how the
system works: how the Jews exert their control through money and media
and a well-entrenched network of Jewish operatives, such as Wolfowitz
and Feith and Perle. And many of these knowledgeable Americans also
understand how Jewish subterfuge and deceit work: they understand that
the Jews throw up a lot of smoke to conceal their control and make it
appear that they have much less influence than they actually do.
Despite this degree of understanding that many knowledgeable Americans
have, there seem to be very few who are willing or able to draw the
necessary conclusions. What I keep seeing are comments about the need
to
get the so-called "peace process" going again in the Middle East, and
how there are hardline supporters of Israel who are obstructing the
"peace process" because they think that it will give too much to the
Palestinians or will compromise Israel's security, or whatever. These
knowledgeable Americans seem to believe that if we could just get
around
the Jewish hardliners somehow -- if we could just neutralize Jews such
as Wolfowitz and Feith and Perle; if Ariel Sharon could be replaced by
a
"moderate" Jewish prime minister -- then the "peace process" could
proceed, America could gradually reduce its involvement in helping the
Jews keep the Palestinians repressed, and eventually Israel no longer
would be using America, and everything would be rosy. And so these
knowledgeable Americans expend all of their wit and energy in these
trivial pursuits.
Listen! Do you know what the most hopeful aspect of the conflict
between
Jews and Palestinians is now? It is the ongoing radicalization of the
Muslim masses throughout the whole Middle East. The collaborator
governments in Pakistan, in Egypt, in Saudi Arabia are terrified of
the
reaction they see among their own people to what Ariel Sharon is doing
to the Palestinians. When Sharon's Jewish troops shoot Palestinian
children, Muslim mobs riot, and governments that now collaborate with
the United States quake. Ariel Sharon is the best thing that has
happened in the Middle East in the last 54 years.
The Palestinian tactic of suicide bombing is being denounced by every
politician and every media spokesman over here now. It's nothing but
terrorism, they all say. There's no justification at all for suicide
bombing, they tell us. Of course, whenever you hear that sort of
unanimity from the politicians and the media people you should be
suspicious. In fact, suicide bombing is the best tactic for the
Palestinians to use now, because it provokes the Jews to step up
reprisals. And the reprisals radicalize the masses in every country in
the Middle East. If just one of the collaborator governments falls,
the
spines of all the rest will be stiffened, and the Bush government will
be far less likely to find collaborators for building its so-called
"coalition" to do the will of the Jews in the Middle East.
Suicide bombers now hardly put a dent in the population of five
million
Jews in occupied Palestine, and Sharon's bloody reprisals hardly put a
dent in the overall Palestinian population. But if conflict of this
sort
continues until just one collaborator government is overthrown, that
ultimately will be worth more than ten thousand successful suicide
bombings in which only 20 or so Jews are killed each time. In the long
run there can be no real peace in the Middle East and no end to
America's shameful role there -- and no future for the Palestinian
people -- as long as there is an Israel. There seems to be a better
understanding of these things among knowledgeable Palestinians than
among knowledgeable Americans.
Shallow thinking and the pursuit of trivial goals is even worse among
knowledgeable Americans when it comes to domestic problems. They
really
do not want to grasp these problems with both hands and deal with them
in a forthright way. Look, for example, at what uncontrolled
immigration
has done and is doing to America. And what do knowledgeable Americans
propose to do about that? Very little, really. They make much of the
fact that several of the al-Qaeda hijackers who carried out the
September 11 attack were in the United States only because of very lax
immigration policies, and so that's a good reason for tightening up
the
policies.
How about simply rounding up all illegal aliens immediately -- all 12
million of them -- and booting them and all of their offspring out of
the country without further ado?
Oh, no, no, no! We can't do that! Why not? Well, the media never would
stand for it. The media would be all over anyone who even proposed a
mass expulsion of illegal aliens. They would denounce any political
leader who tried to do that as a "racist" and a "neo-Nazi." And so
knowledgeable Americans, who understand the immigration disaster quite
well, continue tiptoeing around it, afraid to do or even say anything
really significant about it: terrified even to think about really
radical solutions that might actually end the problem. And it's the
same
with the rest of our domestic problems. Lots of people understand
these
problems and are worried about them, but they won't tackle them in any
significant way. They let the Jews -- the Jewish media and Jewish
money
and the entrenched Jewish network -- have their way, for all practical
purposes.
Why? Why are the Jews permitted to get away with all of their
destructive policies and activities without being challenged or
opposed
in any significant way? Part of the reason is that the Jews are very
powerful, and therefore many people are afraid to cross them. They're
afraid of the sort of media reaction I just mentioned in connection
with
immigration. Everyone understands that the Jews stick together and
will
viciously attack anyone who opposes them. It's the old story, so aptly
expressed by the late-16th-century writer, Sir John Harington.
Harington
wrote: "Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason? For if it
prosper, none dare call it treason." Today the Jewish power structure
is
prospering, and none dare oppose it or even call it what it is.
Well, that's only part of the reason Jews are permitted to get away
with
so much. There's more to it than that. There's a mystique the Jews
have
built very carefully around themselves and nurtured diligently. It is
a
mystique of piety and injured innocence. It is a mystique that says to
the Gentile world: "We are a gentle and inoffensive race, and because
of
this everyone hates us. We're smart and we work hard and achieve
success, and because of this everyone hates us. We are a highly moral
and ethical race, and because of this everyone hates us. We are a very
talented race, with many gifted members, many geniuses, and because of
this everyone hates us. We are a very altruistic race, a race of
philanthropists who only want to make a better world for everyone, and
because of this everyone hates us."
Many simpletons among the lemmings simply accept these claims at face
value. Many knowledgeable people, however, who can see through these
claims to the real Jews hiding behind them, still hesitate to
challenge
them. Part of the Jewish mystique is the so-called "Holocaust." In its
most simpleminded form the "Holocaust" story is the claim that the
Germans hated the Jews for the reasons I just mentioned -- for their
gentleness and their success and their morality and their talent and
their altruism -- and because of this hatred roasted six million of
them
during the Second World War in "gas ovens," to use one of the Jews'
favorite "Holocaust" phrases.
Actually, the "Holocaust" is a very powerful part of the Jewish
mystique. The Jews crafted the "Holocaust" story with great care and
great effort -- well, actually not with as much care as they might
have
used: it's as full of holes as a Swiss cheese, but still it is
sufficient to make most people, even those who understand what Jews
are
really like, hesitate to attack them. People don't want to be seen as
bullies. They don't want to be seen as so insensitive that they would
criticize the Jews, who already have suffered so much, poor dears, at
the hands of anti-Semites.
In several past broadcasts we've looked at a number of the lies and
exaggerations and distortions that make up the "Holocaust" story.
There
are a number of good books available on the subject from the sponsor
of
this broadcast, National Vanguard Books, including Norman
Finklestein's
excellent book The Holocaust Industry, which I discussed in an earlier
broadcast. The point is that despite the lies, despite the fact that
many knowledgeable Americans are aware of the lies, the "Holocaust"
still serves its purpose for the Jews. People are afraid of the image
conjured up by the "Holocaust."
Perhaps it's that American life is too soft... Whatever the
reason, many otherwise knowledgeable and hardheaded Americans just
can't
entertain the idea of rounding up the Jews and getting rid of them,
even
when the situation is as urgent as it is in America today. And really,
in the long run that is the only way to solve the Jewish problem.
The Germans understood that, back in the 1930s, and they had the
courage
and the foresight to act on their understanding. Unlike Americans
today,
they had an honest government concerned above all with the survival,
welfare, and progress of the German people, and they began doing what
was necessary, forcing the Jews to emigrate wholesale from Germany
beginning in 1933. And because of that the Jewish propaganda machine
has
attacked the Germans so viciously, has so blackened and demonized
their
image, that today even knowledgeable people are afraid to be
associated
with that image. They are afraid to say that the Germans were right,
that the Germans were justified, and that we need to do the same if we
are to survive. So, as I said, the "Holocaust" story, despite its
glaring discrepancies and lies, still serves as a shield for the Jews;
it still protects them from criticism.
Well, mostly. In parts of Europe not quite as poisoned by Jewish
propaganda as America is, the shield has slipped a bit. A large
British
department store chain, Selfridges, has yielded to demands from
anti-Israel demonstrators and has removed from its shelves products
marked "Made in Israel." Last week the second largest supermarket
chain
in Norway, Coop Norge -- which is to say, Norway Coop, announced its
decision to boycott all Israeli imports. That decision was not the
result of pressure from anti-Israel demonstrators but was based on the
feeling by Coop Norge management that it would be immoral to continue
supporting the Israeli economy by selling Israeli imports under the
present circumstances. That is a step forward, though it is a long way
from what is needed.
The Jews, of course, immediately began waving their "Holocaust" story
around, and now, as the boycott movement catches hold in Scandinavia,
they are trying to portray themselves as injured innocents being
attacked once more by "anti-Semites." They are comparing the growing
Scandinavian boycott of Israeli products to the German boycott of
Jewish
merchants in the late 1930s. Certainly, a boycott of Israeli products
is
a good thing, and the fact that such a boycott is even thinkable by
big
businessmen today is a sign that the Jewish mystique -- and in
particular the Jewish "Holocaust" story -- is becoming a bit shopworn.
It no longer has the hypnotic power that it once had -- at least, in
some parts of the world.
And I suppose that we should be happy about that. The unfortunate fact
remains, however, that in America the Jews still have their money and
their media and their entrenched network of bureaucrats, and even if
the
"Holocaust" story has lost some of its charm in Europe, it still keeps
most knowledgeable Americans intimidated.
Knowledge isn't enough. Courage and boldness also are necessary.
Honesty
and forthrightness are necessary also. Tiptoeing around the critical
issues of our time isn't enough. Tiny reforms in our disastrous
foreign
policy and in our disastrous immigration policy and in a dozen other
disastrous policies aren't enough. We need to stop apologizing to the
people who are destroying us and go full bore at destroying them
instead.
Instead of being hypnotized by the "Holocaust" story we need to look
with clear eyes at why there was a need for action against the Jews in
Germany in the 1930s and 1940s. The Jews' claim today that the Germans
were suffering from collective insanity and had no reason for trying
to
get the Jews off their backs is as phony as George Bush's claim that
Osama bin Laden had no reason for attacking America on September 11.
Wherever Jews go they corrupt and destroy. That is their nature,
always
and everywhere. Let us be thankful to the Palestinians who now are
making such terrible sacrifices to help the world see what the Jews
are
like. And I suppose we also should be thankful to Ariel Sharon for
demonstrating so forthrightly to the world what Jews are like.
Let us hope that the conflict between Jews and Palestinians
intensifies
and lasts long enough to wake up many more of our people around the
world and fill them with disgust at America's continuing support for
the
Jews. Let us hope that it lasts long enough to bring about the
overthrow
of every collaborationist regime in the Muslim world. Let us hope that
it brings about an airtight oil embargo against the United States and
shuts off the lights in every shopping mall and every sports stadium
in
America long enough for the lemmings to become restless and begin
asking
questions. Let us hope that it makes the efforts of every fool and
every
traitor who is striving for a resumption of the so-called "peace
process" so obviously futile that these efforts no longer have the
power
to deceive anyone.
Ultimately, of course, we must not depend on the Palestinian suicide
bombers or on Ariel Sharon's murder squads to do for us what we should
be doing for ourselves. Ultimately we must stop tiptoeing and begin
marching boldly and forthrightly toward solving our own problems."
Thanks for being with me again today.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of ADV-list.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
==> To subscribe send an e-mail message to:
adv-list-request@NatVan.com
The subject of the message should be: Subscribe
www.spearhead-uk.com http://www.natvan.com
http://www.altermedia.info http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Docky Wocky" |
|
| Title: Re: We Need A "Black Jack" Pershing In Iraq |
05 Dec 2004 12:06:48 AM |
|
|
mr krusty sez:
<Re: Black Jack Pershing>
"Lest the libbydims immediately start their hideous, tiresome squawling
about
how Pershing must have been a rightard "racist", they should read about how
he got his nickname. http://tinyurl.com/6m6qz..."
____________________________________
Your libbydims would go apoplectic if any military officer of Pershing's
bulldog caliber showed up anywhere in US forces.
It is hard work betraying the country and keeping it's enemies enthused.
Anyone who would out-ruthless al Zarqawi would soon find himself on the outs
with the left-wing, and their screeching would drown-out another Krakatau.
It does make you want to see someone like that do God's work just one more
time.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
