| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" |
| Date: |
27 Dec 2004 09:18:06 PM |
| Object: |
We need a new name for "conspiracy theorist" |
Most in the anti-govt crowd don't understand how important this is.
They think - hey we're in the right and that's all that matters. WRONG
- most people don't look into the issues and just judge things by what
they're called and "conspiracy theorist" has lots of negative baggage.
Here's the best i could come up with - gover-media skeptic.
.
|
|
| User: "ABDULLAH OBBLONGATTA" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for "conspiracy theorist" |
28 Dec 2004 09:15:23 PM |
|
|
LOL, and you personally know that for fact because.....??????
I heard it through the grapevine.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny Lingo" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for "conspiracy theorist" |
28 Dec 2004 09:59:30 PM |
|
|
"ABDULLAH OBBLONGATTA" <obblonga@aol.com> wrote in message
news:v884t0dvvgvnl56f25gdqo1eap56bj98ga@4ax.com...
LOL, and you personally know that for fact because.....??????
I heard it through the grapevine.
LOL, your are a k00k!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Erickson" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for "conspiracy theorist" |
05 Jan 2005 07:48:45 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 03:59:30 GMT, "Johnny Lingo"
<johnnylingo@spammenot.com> wrote:
"ABDULLAH OBBLONGATTA" <obblonga@aol.com> wrote in message
news:v884t0dvvgvnl56f25gdqo1eap56bj98ga@4ax.com...
LOL, and you personally know that for fact because.....??????
I heard it through the grapevine.
LOL, your are a k00k!
Yeah, nobody has malodorous urine
Slobbering Skeleton
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "OrionCA" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for "conspiracy theorist" |
29 Dec 2004 05:34:35 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 03:15:23 GMT, ABDULLAH OBBLONGATTA
<obblonga@aol.com> wrote:
LOL, and you personally know that for fact because.....??????
I heard it through the grapevine.
You should stop smoking grapevines.
--
"Iraq was a brilliant campaign fought with minimal
casualties, 11 September was a humiliating failure
by government to fulfill its primary role of
national defence. But Democrats who complained that
Bush was too slow to act on doubtful intelligence
re 9/11 now profess to be horrified that he was too
quick to act on doubtful intelligence re Iraq. This
is not a serious party."
http://www.spectator.co.uk/article.php3?table=old§ion=current&issue=2003-07-19&id=3319
.
|
|
|
| User: "ABDULLAH OBBLONGATTA" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for "conspiracy theorist" |
29 Dec 2004 09:47:15 AM |
|
|
You should stop smoking grapevines.
Your message included a quote about something or other not
being a serious party, yet you advise me to stop smoking grapevines.
how can ANYBODY have a serious party without smoking grapevines?
Sheesh.
PS: George Bush has malodorous urine.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Scream Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for "conspiracy theorist" |
27 Dec 2004 11:04:28 PM |
|
|
I have to agree.
Conspiracy theories or theorists are bunched into a broad umbrella.
Everything from alien abductions to the JFK assination shouldn't be grouped
into one broad category.
When a government like the current administration is so secretive, you're
left to do the only thing you can do -- to simply theorize and postulate.
Simple questions like "What was the REAL reason we went to war with Iraq"
have gone unanswered.
By the government. By the cowering media.
Just because someone has the curiosity to question and ponder that question
for themselves, they are said to be "conspiracy theorists", right up there
with loons who believe they were abducted by alien spaceships and
anally-probed.
"Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1104203886.228580.203810@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Most in the anti-govt crowd don't understand how important this is.
They think - hey we're in the right and that's all that matters. WRONG
- most people don't look into the issues and just judge things by what
they're called and "conspiracy theorist" has lots of negative baggage.
Here's the best i could come up with - gover-media skeptic.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Shel Scott WellDone" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for "conspiracy theorist" |
30 Dec 2004 03:14:18 PM |
|
|
"Scream Machine" <shake@hotmail.com> wrote:
Simple questions like "What was the REAL reason we went to war with Iraq"
have gone unanswered.
Because they were sponsoring terrorists, training terrorists, and
encouraging terrorism, you fucking idiot... and the place was a
cesspool of human misery, a place where "half a million children were
starving because of sanctions".
--
): "I may make you feel, but I can't make you think" :(
(: Off the monitor, through the modem, nothing but net :)
.
|
|
|
| User: "BUSH=TERRORIST" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for "conspiracy theorist" |
07 Jan 2005 03:54:20 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 13:14:18 -0800, Shel Scott <WellDone> wrote:
"Scream Machine" <shake@hotmail.com> wrote:
Simple questions like "What was the REAL reason we went to war with Iraq"
have gone unanswered.
Because they were sponsoring terrorists, training terrorists, and
encouraging terrorism, you fucking idiot... and the place was a
You really should keep up, it's already been proven there was no
evidence of terrorism and Iraq. Congress would only give Bush
approval to invade Iraq if it was related to terrorism, and Bush
would have to sign a declaration to the fact, which he did. Wow,
then suddenly, out of the blue, the story comes out about Saddam
and Al Queda ties. Yes, those propaganda boys are always
having to work overtime to put out their BS lies to cover up
the previous lies they've been found out about.
In an interview with Ray McGovern, former CIA analyst by
Amy Goodman is a prime example of Bush's lies so he
could invade Iraq to steal their oil :
RAY MCGOVERN Yes, he testified before the Senate
Intelligence Committee that in discussions with a
Mr. Joseph of the NSC, he suggested that since
the agency didn't vouch for the business about
Iraq seeking uranium from Niger, that it ought
not to be used in the President's State of the
Union address, and indeed they had managed
to get it out of previous presidential speeches.
So why did they want to put it back in there?
Well, finally he was persuaded that well, let's
blame it on the British. Let's say, according
to a British report. And Foley said, I suppose
that would be alright to blame it on the British.
Now, they didn't even say "according to a British
report". What the President said was "the British
have learned". That's a lot different. We are
pretty careful with words in the intelligence
community, but that is what the President said,
"the British have learned that Iraq was seeking
uranium from an African country".
Now, Foley took the fall with that, along with
Tenet, but it was really sort of Tenet saying
"I confess, she did it". Because Tenet doesn't
write these speeches. Condeleezza Rice is
responsible for that. So what is Tenet was
confessing ? He’s confessing to being a lousy
proofreader. He didn't read the final draft,
and there it was.
AMY GOODMAN But Alan Foley said "we know this
not to be true". And they said well, why don’t we just
leave that part out and say that the British say it’s true?
RAY MCGOVERN We'll use it anyway and we'll pin
it on the British report. I watched the speech. We all
watched the speech. When the President says the
British have learned something, the presumption is
the President is telling the truth. But the President
was not telling the truth and everyone knew that."
Full interview located at :
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4736.htm
cesspool of human misery, a place where "half a million children were
starving because of sanctions".
Well that wouldn't have happened if the CIA hadn't put their puppet
Saddam in power in 1979, sold him chemicals etc. But just like
Noriega, once they decided not to be puppets anymore it's time
for them to be removed. Amazing how the US knew what Saddam
had been doing to the Iraq people for nearly 20 years and never did
anything about it, but as soon as Saddam wasn't willing to be
controlled any longer, he's suddenly an evil monster and the US
gives their BS crap of how they care so much about the welfare
of the Iraqi people. Yes, they care so much they're using illegal
cluster bombs murdering tens of thousands of innocent people,
targeted 37 hospitals, two of which were filled with defenseless,
sick children, 99% of the targeted bombings were of the poorest
neighborhoods in Iraq, using depleted uranium in missiles and
rockets contaminating the people, the land, air and water. Tens
of thousands homeless, still only 3% with electricity nearly two
years later, water shortage etc., yes Bush gives a new meaning
to "liberation", along with "evil monster".
It can't be that 99% of the world is wrong, and Bush is right. Bush
isn't welcome anywhere in the world, causing massive rioting and
protesting where ever he goes. He's on vacation, as usual, so it's
not like he couldn't go to Asia himself. But instead, he sends Powell
and his brother. Claiming Jeb as an "expert". At what, flying over a
disaster zone in a helicopter ? GW just continues to show he's no
leader by any means, Christ, he can't even get speech writers who
can write over a 2nd grade level, Bush can't hold a press conference
without having notes, otherwise he goes off into space, giving his
usual blank look trying to think of an answer to a simple question on
a subject he should be at least half aware of, but isn't, and
definitely has no class what so ever.
But apparently American's don't mind being thought of as "Satan"
having an idiot as their President who can't even put two sentences
together that make any sense, in a nutshell he's thought of as a total
moron, who has lied to this nation to achieve his and his buddies
goals, with the American people footing the bills, who has illegally
mass murdered tens of thousands of innocent people including our
own soldiers who pay the ultimate price, while the greedy rake in the
billions in profit.
Humans are the dumbest species on the planet, bar none.
Einstein himself said, "two things are infinite, the universe and
human stupidity, but not sure about the first".
When the power of love defeats the love of power and greed,
only then can there be peace in the world.
Mankind must put an end to war or war will put an end to
mankind.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for "conspiracy theorist" |
28 Dec 2004 04:33:16 AM |
|
|
***Simple questions like "What was the REAL reason we went to war with
Iraq"
have gone unanswered.
By the government. By the cowering media.
***
Yep, now you are one too. Well, stupidity is a major component.
Paranioa and distrust another. Partisanship is often a component but
not always. Lack of comprehension is a problem (stupidity category).
Given to emotionalism and complaining is also a root cause. Feelings of
helplessness. Failure in life. Victim mentality.
On the upside the quacks think they know something others don't, giving
them a feeling of power or superiority. (I won't be fooled by these
evils as others are ! " ) This is along the lines of mental illness,
which becomes obvious once engaging the weirdo.
For some it's a hobby. They generally just have fun and you can catch
the humor. There are also people making money from it, who aren't true
believers.
New name for the wackos :
paranoid public pundits ?
Orwell's Children ?
The 1984 crew ?
Aireahead 51's
Antifemantics
( against FEMA - got the FEM in there - they are ANTI - doing ANTICS)
Yeah, I like that one.
ANTIFEMANTICS
.
|
|
|
| User: "War On Error" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for "conspiracy theorist" |
28 Dec 2004 06:07:50 AM |
|
|
<silicondoc@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1104229996.065011.292910@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
***Simple questions like "What was the REAL reason we went to war with
Iraq"
have gone unanswered.
By the government. By the cowering media.
***
Yep, now you are one too. Well, stupidity is a major component.
Paranioa and distrust another. Partisanship is often a component but
not always. Lack of comprehension is a problem (stupidity category).
Wanna make $100,000? Provide conclusive proof that the official 9/11 story
is correct. That's all you have to do.
Why haven't you collected the ca$h yet? Is it because you have no proof?
If you have no proof, why do you believe the official lie?
WOE
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kyle Daulton" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for "conspiracy theorist" |
28 Dec 2004 06:08:35 AM |
|
|
"War On Error" <nospam@nomail.com> wrote in message
news:q0cAd.715200$mD.45776@attbi_s02...
<silicondoc@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1104229996.065011.292910@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
***Simple questions like "What was the REAL reason we went to war with
Iraq"
have gone unanswered.
By the government. By the cowering media.
***
Yep, now you are one too. Well, stupidity is a major component.
Paranioa and distrust another. Partisanship is often a component but
not always. Lack of comprehension is a problem (stupidity category).
Wanna make $100,000? Provide conclusive proof that the official 9/11
story is correct. That's all you have to do.
Why haven't you collected the ca$h yet? Is it because you have no proof?
If you have no proof, why do you believe the official lie?
WOE
Faith, alone. Misplaced, at that.
--
**********
"The question of religion and politics is not the same as the question of
church and state. Failure to make this distinction results in
onfusion." -- Kenneth Cauthen
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fredrick Garvin" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for "conspiracy theorist" |
28 Dec 2004 08:42:18 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 12:07:50 +0000, War On Error wrote:
Wanna make $100,000? Provide conclusive proof that the official 9/11 story
is correct. That's all you have to do.
Why haven't you collected the ca$h yet? Is it because you have no proof?
If you have no proof, why do you believe the official lie?
WOE
I'd like to thank the parents and teachers of the world for doing such a
great job with the children.....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredrick Garvin" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for "conspiracy theorist" |
29 Dec 2004 05:44:27 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 18:07:49 -0800, Anonymous wrote:
Fredrick Garvin wrote:
I'd like to thank the parents and teachers of the world for
doing such a great job with the children.....
It isn't the parent's "fault," or the teachers.
[sarcasm mode on]
No, of coarse not.....
[sarcasm mode off]
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Krusty" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for "conspiracy theorist" |
27 Dec 2004 09:23:52 PM |
|
|
I'm hearing you loud and clear Laura!
Here's my suggestion.
"Loonball Kook, Tin Foil Beanie Wearing Chowder Head From The Outer Edge Of
The Second Quadrant Of The Galactic Empire"
Hope that helps.
"Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1104203886.228580.203810@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Most in the anti-govt crowd don't understand how important this is.
They think - hey we're in the right and that's all that matters. WRONG
- most people don't look into the issues and just judge things by what
they're called and "conspiracy theorist" has lots of negative baggage.
Here's the best i could come up with - gover-media skeptic.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for "conspiracy theorist" |
28 Dec 2004 09:30:50 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Right! And the Gulf of Tonkin, Watergate, the Cambodia bombings and
Iran/Contra were not government conspiracies I suppose. In fact,
conspiracies don't even exist, do they? Or is that true only when
they
implicate your side?
The biggest conspiracy at this time, however, is the creation of the
illusion that George W. Bush has a brain and a soul.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for "conspiracy theorist" |
29 Dec 2004 01:27:02 AM |
|
|
Really. Since the election is over, the creation of the illusion that
Kerry had an issue to stand on is now gone. :-(
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for Liberal Strategic Insanity |
27 Dec 2004 11:51:54 PM |
|
|
In article "Laura" wrote:
Most in the anti-govt crowd don't understand how important this is.
They think - hey we're in the right and that's all that matters. WRONG
- most people don't look into the issues and just judge things by what
they're called and "conspiracy theorist" has lots of negative baggage.
Here's the best i could come up with - gover-media skeptic.
The Irony.
It *IS* unbearable.
Is this not yet another PERFECT example?
Pointy Headed Liberals believing that it is that the appraisal
of others is superior to their own, even to the facts of reality?
Lacking both the means-and-grounds
for a moral-and-principled defense of their politics,
they lust for legitimacy-in-a-name which they cannot express in an Idea. {:^D
And WHY is it that are they motivated to do so?
(aside from sheer panic of trying to motivate a yet-another-nonexistant
ground-swell before Jan'20th)
The Disapproval of others is so shatteringly terrifying to them
that nothing can withstand such impact. principled dissent is viewed
as the ultimate horror, which is why such dissent is accorded only to
a trusted few, those willing to bear such burden of sacrifice....
As-if ALL YOU PEOPLE really matter to them!
As-if the ployful adjulations of 'little people' really count.
Especially those who CANNOT afford to attend their gala-events
-- let alone eat caviar and drink champaign at their sunday brunches.
Rest assured, the Lib's are more than willing to bear the burden
of the sacrifice of acting on YOUR behalf, by the will of the people.
-- if only YOU will be willing to obey, to sacrifice, when called upon.
Imagine their frightful embarrassment
if only a single bus-load of protesters show up
whenever, and wherever they command it to be so! {:^D
(as-if you don't have better things to do!)
Where there’s sacrifice, there’s someone collecting sacrificial offerings.
The man who speaks to you of sacrifice, speaks of slaves and masters,
-- intending to be the master, to make the trains run on time, to implement
by the will of the people, the common good, on behalf of the
Desperate and Deliberately Evil.
What 'name' do we 'need' to invent
that will not offend their fine sensibilities?
These are the Moral Vandals who exist to NOT ONLY Corrupt and Destroy but who
WOULD ALSO have you sponsor your adversaries, forcing you to watch,
to tolerate the intolerable, to defend the indefensible, to take
from you in the name of the "Common Good" implemented
on behalf of the Desperate and the Deliberately Evil.
Liberal Strategic Insanity is quite apt.
Should we not pity their Devil for being Evil?
http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/103319.jpg
Better make it a Double -- it's gonna be a long decade.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roedy Green" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for Liberal Strategic Insanity |
28 Dec 2004 02:46:55 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 05:51:54 GMT, (MANFRED
the heat seeking OBOE) wrote or quoted :
The Irony.
It *IS* unbearable.
Is this not yet another PERFECT example?
Pointy Headed Liberals believing that it is that the appraisal
of others is superior to their own, even to the facts of reality?
Lacking both the means-and-grounds
for a moral-and-principled defense of their politics,
they lust for legitimacy-in-a-name which they cannot express in an Idea. {:^D
And WHY is it that are they motivated to do so?
(aside from sheer panic of trying to motivate a yet-another-nonexistant
ground-swell before Jan'20th)
I think this guy guzzled a gallon of floor wax thinking it was eggnog.
"Never in human history have such genocide and cruelty been witnessed.
Such a genocide was never seen in the time of the pharaohs nor of Hitler
nor of Mussolini."
~ Mehmet Elkatmi, head of Turkish parliament's human rights commission
on Bush's atrocities in the Iraq war.
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
See http://mindprod.com/iraq.html photos of Bush's war crimes
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for Liberal Strategic Insanity |
28 Dec 2004 08:46:48 PM |
|
|
Ooh; witty retort. You think this is a sitcom or something?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "pain." |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for Liberal Strategic Insanity |
28 Dec 2004 10:06:22 AM |
|
|
Roedy Green posted:
And WHY is it that are they motivated to do so?
(aside from sheer panic of trying to motivate a yet-another-nonexistant
ground-swell before Jan'20th)
I think this guy guzzled a gallon of floor wax thinking it was eggnog.
He sure thinks we give a ***** what he thinks...
The Disapproval of others is so shatteringly terrifying to them
that nothing can withstand such impact.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for Liberal Strategic Insanity |
28 Dec 2004 04:52:34 AM |
|
|
Roedy Green to XETON..@ : There is NOTHING in that whole post but empty
insult. You offered no
suggestion of your own.
Roedy Green in his VERY NEXT POST to Expresid ..@ : I think this guy
guzzled a gallon of floor wax thinking it was eggnog.
Roedy Green is a braindead zombie lefticuckoo hypocryphal fucktardicus,
an " ANTIFEMANTIC".
" Democratic liberals pretend they haven't lived a day of their
lives
outside the confines of their own imaginations. Real world to them is
pretending the earth is a rotting apple ready to crumble in a fructose
oxidizing hellfire. " - Jared Condolein ,Surf n Turf restaurant to the
Stars director, Santa Monica, CA
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for Liberal Strategic Insanity |
28 Dec 2004 12:25:52 AM |
|
|
That is the stupidest post in internet history, you loonybird.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for Liberal Strategic Insanity |
28 Dec 2004 09:30:36 PM |
|
|
Couldn't be; you didn't post it, loser.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Krusty" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for Liberal Strategic Insanity |
29 Dec 2004 05:23:40 PM |
|
|
Loonybird? LOONYBIRD? This coming from the Queen Fuckin Loonybird of
Loonybird Mountain in the land of Loonybirdstan?
"Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1104215152.008036.85090@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
That is the stupidest post in internet history, you loonybird.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Roedy Green" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for "conspiracy theorist" |
28 Dec 2004 12:38:33 AM |
|
|
On 27 Dec 2004 19:18:06 -0800, "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend"
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote or quoted :
"conspiracy theorist"
call them "skeptics". The whackiest conspiracy theory of them all is
the one Cheney tried to fob off on the public. It is just too
ludicrous for words.
The Ruppert explanation is NOT a conspiracy theory. He explained how
Cheney pulled it off without most of the people who co-operated
figuring out what was going on. They had no idea how their part fitted
into Cheney's scheme.
The things that makes most conspiracy theories ludicrous is they
require LARGE numbers of people to hatch a plot and keep a giant
secret. That just does not happen, though COVERUPS involving large
number of people are common.
Crossing the Rubicon: 9/11 and the Decline of the American Empire at
the End of the Age of Oil
Michael C. Ruppert
Ruppert is an ex-Cop. He builds a solid case that ***** Cheney is the
mastermind behind 9/11.
You can get the book at any of these online bookstores
Amazon
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0865715408/canadianmindprod
http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/ASIN/0865715408/canadianmindp-20
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0865715408/canadianmindp-21
http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/0865715408/canadianmin0b-21
Bares & Noble
http://service.bfast.com/bfast/click?bfmid=2181&sourceid=39378888&bfpid=0865715408&bfmtype=book
Chapters Indigo in Canada
http://chapters.indigo.ca/Affiliates/ItemPage.asp?PRODUCTTYPE=1&AFFID=109369&ISBN=0865715408
"Never in human history have such genocide and cruelty been witnessed.
Such a genocide was never seen in the time of the pharaohs nor of Hitler
nor of Mussolini."
~ Mehmet Elkatmi, head of Turkish parliament's human rights commission
on Bush's atrocities in the Iraq war.
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
See http://mindprod.com/iraq.html photos of Bush's war crimes
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fredrick Garvin" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for "conspiracy theorist" |
28 Dec 2004 05:30:00 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 19:18:06 -0800, Laura Bush murdered her boy friend
wrote:
Most in the anti-govt crowd don't understand how important this is.
They think - hey we're in the right and that's all that matters. WRONG
- most people don't look into the issues and just judge things by what
they're called and "conspiracy theorist" has lots of negative baggage.
Here's the best i could come up with - gover-media skeptic.
I like "paranoid retard".
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for "conspiracy theorist" |
27 Dec 2004 10:16:41 PM |
|
|
That's the best you could come up with? You're a pathetic loser. Hell,
"pathetic loser" is a more apt title than "gover-media skeptic." It
must *really* suck to be you. How is it you're able to resist the
overwhelming urge to eat a bullet every morning when you wake up, or
when you're lying there in your bed alone?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roedy Green" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for "conspiracy theorist" |
28 Dec 2004 02:45:32 AM |
|
|
On 27 Dec 2004 20:16:41 -0800,
Xeton2001IsAMoron.20.dwpj65@spamgourmet.com wrote or quoted :
That's the best you could come up with? You're a pathetic loser. Hell,
"pathetic loser" is a more apt title than "gover-media skeptic." It
must *really* suck to be you. How is it you're able to resist the
overwhelming urge to eat a bullet every morning when you wake up, or
when you're lying there in your bed alone?
There is NOTHING in that whole post but empty insult. You offered no
suggestion of your own. This is not a sitcom.
"Never in human history have such genocide and cruelty been witnessed.
Such a genocide was never seen in the time of the pharaohs nor of Hitler
nor of Mussolini."
~ Mehmet Elkatmi, head of Turkish parliament's human rights commission
on Bush's atrocities in the Iraq war.
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
See http://mindprod.com/iraq.html photos of Bush's war crimes
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: We need a new name for "conspiracy theorist" |
27 Dec 2004 11:06:53 PM |
|
|
That's the best you could come up with? You're a pathetic loser. Hell,
"pathetic loser" is a more apt title than "gover-media skeptic." It
must *really* suck to be you. How is it you're able to resist the
overwhelming urge to eat a bullet every morning when you wake up, or
when you're lying there in your bed alone?
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
