| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"See It Now!" |
| Date: |
31 Jan 2006 03:41:57 PM |
| Object: |
Welcome to Bush's Depression |
Americans' personal savings rate dipped into negative territory in 2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other big-ticket
items.
The Commerce Department reported Monday that the savings rate fell into
negative territory at minus 0.5 percent, meaning that Americans not only
spent all of their after-tax income last year but had to dip into previous
savings or increase borrowing.
The savings rate has been negative for an entire year only twice before --
in 1932 and 1933 -- two years when the country was struggling to cope with
the Great Depression, a time of massive business failures and job layoffs.
Have you noticed the price of gold recently (over $500/oz. & rising)?
That's a pretty good indicator of how much trouble we are in.
.
|
|
| User: "Stan de SD" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
31 Jan 2006 05:59:58 PM |
|
|
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:FQQDf.20465$Yu.8356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Americans' personal savings rate dipped into negative territory in 2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other
big-ticket
items.
And that's a sign of a depression, or reckless spending by people who want
instant gratification?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
31 Jan 2006 06:19:18 PM |
|
|
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:FQQDf.20465$Yu.8356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Americans' personal savings rate dipped into negative territory in 2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other
big-ticket
items.
Why are you blaming Bush for stupid consumer behavior?
Robert
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
31 Jan 2006 06:36:24 PM |
|
|
"Robert" <writer77@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:4v6dnem6yM8dY0LenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:FQQDf.20465$Yu.8356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Americans' personal savings rate dipped into negative territory in
2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other
big-ticket
items.
Why are you blaming Bush for stupid consumer behavior?
Because the batshit liberals will grasp any straw that they think they can
in their failing effort to smear the President.
The entire production is getting downright silly.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "OrionCA" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
31 Jan 2006 09:12:45 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:36:24 -0800, "Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote:
"Robert" <writer77@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:4v6dnem6yM8dY0LenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:FQQDf.20465$Yu.8356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Americans' personal savings rate dipped into negative territory in
2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other
big-ticket
items.
Why are you blaming Bush for stupid consumer behavior?
Because the batshit liberals will grasp any straw that they think they can
in their failing effort to smear the President.
The entire production is getting downright silly.
"is getting"? It was silly when they started blaming Bush back before
he even took office - or won the 2000 election, for that matter.
--
"Even as the Times defended Echelon as "a necessity"
in 1999, evidence already existed that the Clintonites
had misused electronic surveillance for political
purposes. Intelligence officials told Insight magazine
in 1997 that they had spied on a 1993 conference of
Asian and Pacific world leaders in Seattle hosted by
Clinton and some of that information was passed on to
big Democratic corporate donors for use against their
competitors."
http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/60314.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "See It Now!" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
01 Feb 2006 12:35:35 AM |
|
|
"OrionCA" <OrionCA@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:vn90u1hjd5ouplch70fl9he7ctlumgh41v@4ax.com...
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:36:24 -0800, "Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote:
"Robert" <writer77@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:4v6dnem6yM8dY0LenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:FQQDf.20465$Yu.8356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Americans' personal savings rate dipped into negative territory in
2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other
big-ticket
items.
Why are you blaming Bush for stupid consumer behavior?
Because the batshit liberals will grasp any straw that they think they can
in their failing effort to smear the President.
The entire production is getting downright silly.
"is getting"? It was silly when they started blaming Bush back before
he even took office - or won the 2000 election, for that matter.
Appointed.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
01 Feb 2006 09:38:28 AM |
|
|
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:XEYDf.20538$Yu.12277@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"OrionCA" <OrionCA@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:vn90u1hjd5ouplch70fl9he7ctlumgh41v@4ax.com...
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:36:24 -0800, "Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote:
"Robert" <writer77@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:4v6dnem6yM8dY0LenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:FQQDf.20465$Yu.8356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Americans' personal savings rate dipped into negative territory in
2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other
big-ticket
items.
Why are you blaming Bush for stupid consumer behavior?
Because the batshit liberals will grasp any straw that they think they
can
in their failing effort to smear the President.
The entire production is getting downright silly.
"is getting"? It was silly when they started blaming Bush back before
he even took office - or won the 2000 election, for that matter.
Appointed.
Dim rule number one, avoid the problem.
So you are blind to Clintoon domestic surveillance.
What a surprise. And you accuse the present administration of lying.
What a pack of jackals.
Jim E
Figures
.
|
|
|
| User: "See It Now!" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
01 Feb 2006 11:58:13 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
news:44c2vnF1epukU1@individual.net...
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:XEYDf.20538$Yu.12277@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"OrionCA" <OrionCA@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:vn90u1hjd5ouplch70fl9he7ctlumgh41v@4ax.com...
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:36:24 -0800, "Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote:
"Robert" <writer77@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:4v6dnem6yM8dY0LenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:FQQDf.20465$Yu.8356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Americans' personal savings rate dipped into negative territory in
2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other
big-ticket
items.
Why are you blaming Bush for stupid consumer behavior?
Because the batshit liberals will grasp any straw that they think they
can
in their failing effort to smear the President.
The entire production is getting downright silly.
"is getting"? It was silly when they started blaming Bush back before
he even took office - or won the 2000 election, for that matter.
Appointed.
Dim rule number one, avoid the problem.
So you are blind to Clintoon domestic surveillance.
What a surprise. And you accuse the present administration of lying.
What a pack of jackals.
No, Clinton had warrants. Emporer Bush doesn't.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
01 Feb 2006 03:42:46 PM |
|
|
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:VE6Ef.29131$H71.10400@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
news:44c2vnF1epukU1@individual.net...
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:XEYDf.20538$Yu.12277@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"OrionCA" <OrionCA@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:vn90u1hjd5ouplch70fl9he7ctlumgh41v@4ax.com...
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:36:24 -0800, "Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote:
"Robert" <writer77@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:4v6dnem6yM8dY0LenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:FQQDf.20465$Yu.8356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Americans' personal savings rate dipped into negative territory in
2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other
big-ticket
items.
Why are you blaming Bush for stupid consumer behavior?
Because the batshit liberals will grasp any straw that they think they
can
in their failing effort to smear the President.
The entire production is getting downright silly.
"is getting"? It was silly when they started blaming Bush back before
he even took office - or won the 2000 election, for that matter.
Appointed.
Dim rule number one, avoid the problem.
So you are blind to Clintoon domestic surveillance.
What a surprise. And you accuse the present administration of lying.
What a pack of jackals.
No, Clinton had warrants. Emporer Bush doesn't.
Prove it, cite .
good luck
Jim E
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Deaf Power" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
31 Jan 2006 07:00:16 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:36:24 -0800, "Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote:
"Robert" <writer77@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:4v6dnem6yM8dY0LenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:FQQDf.20465$Yu.8356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Americans' personal savings rate dipped into negative territory in
2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other
big-ticket
items.
Why are you blaming Bush for stupid consumer behavior?
Because the batshit liberals will grasp any straw that they think they can
in their failing effort to smear the President.
The entire production is getting downright silly.
***** Dim E is blaming on the liberals for Bush's fault.
--
A vote for republican is a vote for fascism!
http://www.oldamericancentury.org/14pts.htm
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jorge W. Arbusto" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
31 Jan 2006 07:00:18 PM |
|
|
"Robert" <writer77@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:4v6dnem6yM8dY0LenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:FQQDf.20465$Yu.8356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Americans' personal savings rate dipped into negative territory in
2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other
big-ticket
items.
Why are you blaming Bush for stupid consumer behavior?
Robert
Yeah, they should be able to save 12% of their annual wages on a Wal-mart
income--and still put roofs over their heads, and used econoboxes in their
garages...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Deaf Power" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
31 Jan 2006 06:58:48 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:19:18 -0800, "Robert" <writer77@comcast.net>
wrote:
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:FQQDf.20465$Yu.8356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Americans' personal savings rate dipped into negative territory in 2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other
big-ticket
items.
Why are you blaming Bush for stupid consumer behavior?
Because Bush has turned USA into a fascist country controlled by
corporations supported by fascist Republican Congress. Bush is
anti-worker and anti-union and pro-corporations. Many Americans lost
jobs because of fascist Bush.
--
A vote for republican is a vote for fascism!
http://www.oldamericancentury.org/14pts.htm
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "hc23hc" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
01 Feb 2006 01:31:51 AM |
|
|
Robert gapemouthed:
Why are you blaming Bush for stupid consumer behavior?
Fair's fair, Robert. Bush is blaming consumers for making his sleazy
stWpid pals even richer, says he has plan to end oil 'addiction'.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/31/bush.sotu/index.html
Bush is an ***** who will never receive half the blame he rightly
deserves, not even if he rots in jail until he's older and smells worse
than Mother Teresa.
..
..
..
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "OhBee OneKunobee" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
31 Jan 2006 04:37:20 PM |
|
|
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:FQQDf.20465$Yu.8356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Americans' personal savings rate dipped into negative territory in 2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other
big-ticket
items.
===============================
You obviously dont know the definition of a depression or recession. But
then agai you can't pok eholes in paper ballots properly, so i am not really
surprised.
.
|
|
|
| User: "See It Now!" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
31 Jan 2006 06:29:04 PM |
|
|
"OhBee OneKunobee" <Ohbee@aol.com> wrote in message
news:vMOdnZG95dACe0LeRVn-oA@adelphia.com...
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:FQQDf.20465$Yu.8356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Americans' personal savings rate dipped into negative territory in
2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other
big-ticket
items.
===============================
You obviously dont know the definition of a depression or recession. But
then agai you can't pok eholes in paper ballots properly, so i am not
really
surprised.
I don't live in poke-a-hole Floriduh.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Another Democrat Abramoff Bribe Taker I take bribes @ DNC.org" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
31 Jan 2006 06:57:32 PM |
|
|
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:khTDf.40664$dW3.38308@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
"OhBee OneKunobee" <Ohbee@aol.com> wrote in message
news:vMOdnZG95dACe0LeRVn-oA@adelphia.com...
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:FQQDf.20465$Yu.8356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Americans' personal savings rate dipped into negative territory in
2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other
big-ticket
items.
===============================
You obviously dont know the definition of a depression or recession.
But
then agai you can't pok eholes in paper ballots properly, so i am not
really
surprised.
I don't live in poke-a-hole Floriduh.
=================
Dont tell me that have Computer voting in your Kentucky Holler??
.
|
|
|
| User: "See It Now!" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
01 Feb 2006 12:34:47 AM |
|
|
"Another Democrat Abramoff Bribe Taker" <I take bribes @ DNC.org> wrote in
message news:5ICdnTgK9Krmmn3enZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@adelphia.com...
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:khTDf.40664$dW3.38308@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
"OhBee OneKunobee" <Ohbee@aol.com> wrote in message
news:vMOdnZG95dACe0LeRVn-oA@adelphia.com...
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:FQQDf.20465$Yu.8356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Americans' personal savings rate dipped into negative territory in
2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other
big-ticket
items.
===============================
You obviously dont know the definition of a depression or recession.
But
then agai you can't pok eholes in paper ballots properly, so i am not
really
surprised.
I don't live in poke-a-hole Floriduh.
=================
Dont tell me that have Computer voting in your Kentucky Holler??
I don't live on a mountain top in Tennessee either. How's your fuel bills
there in PA?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Neo" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
31 Jan 2006 05:56:39 PM |
|
|
OhBee OneKunobee wrote:
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:FQQDf.20465$Yu.8356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Americans' personal savings rate dipped into negative territory in
2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other
big-ticket
items.
===============================
You obviously dont know the definition of a depression or recession. But
then agai you can't pok eholes in paper ballots properly, so i am not
really surprised.
you're just upset that bushturd is blowing his legacy with each passing day.
his game is going down the tubes.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "E.E.bud keith" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
31 Jan 2006 04:16:00 PM |
|
|
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:FQQDf.20465$Yu.8356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Americans' personal savings rate dipped into negative territory in 2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other
big-ticket items.
It would be nice if you woul explain why the buying habits of the people are
Bush's fault. Furthernore the refinance of homes because of lower intrest
rates caused borrowing on a large scale. Also the fact that the me
generation has to have the latest auto and electronic gadget rather then
saving their money cannot be blamed on the President,any President. It is
simply fools like you who have nothing else on their pea sized minds but
hating Bush that believe this bull *****.
The Commerce Department reported Monday that the savings rate fell into
negative territory at minus 0.5 percent, meaning that Americans not only
spent all of their after-tax income last year but had to dip into previous
savings or increase borrowing.
The savings rate has been negative for an entire year only twice
before -- in 1932 and 1933 -- two years when the country was struggling
to cope with the Great Depression, a time of massive business failures and
job layoffs.
Have you noticed the price of gold recently (over $500/oz. & rising)?
That's a pretty good indicator of how much trouble we are in.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jorge W. Arbusto" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
31 Jan 2006 06:57:09 PM |
|
|
"E.E.Buttbuddy Retracto Teeth" <bud is a kook101@scumcast.net> wrote in
message news:ZO6dne-_27k5fELenZ2dnUVZ_tKdnZ2d@comcast.com...
"See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net> wrote in message
news:FQQDf.20465$Yu.8356@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Americans' personal savings rate dipped into negative territory in 2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other
big-ticket items.
It would be nice if you woul explain why the buying habits of the people
are Bush's fault. Furthernore the refinance of homes because of lower
intrest rates caused borrowing on a large scale. Also the fact that the me
generation has to have the latest auto and electronic gadget rather then
saving their money cannot be blamed on the President,any President. It is
simply fools like you who have nothing else on their pea sized minds but
hating Bush that believe this bull *****.
Well, y'know, EEButtbuddy, they wouldn't have to go into debt for the
necessities, if the US wasn't exporting all the good paying jobs to Red
China.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
31 Jan 2006 07:17:17 PM |
|
|
Stork replied to:
Well, y'know, EEButtbuddy, they wouldn't have to go into debt for the necessities,
So, are you saying an X-Box 360 is a necessity? Or a 42" Plasma screen
TV? HDTV? Digital Cable? Cell Phones? $100 shoes? Let's get real
here, America is unbelievable rich, there's a lot of cool stuff to buy,
and people don't mind taking on debt to buy it because they are
optimistic enough to believe that their fortunes will improve. Ergot,
the Bush economy is working.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
31 Jan 2006 06:30:34 PM |
|
|
Dumbass. Most American's wealth is held in appreciated housing values
and stocks, which are not included in the "savings rate".
There's a new invention called an Autogyro, you'll love it, being so
old school.
That be said, Americans are economically illiterate and overtly
materialistic, which is not a good combination.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "OrionCA" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
31 Jan 2006 09:10:52 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:41:57 GMT, "See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net>
wrote:
Americans' personal savings rate dipped into negative territory in 2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other big-ticket
items.
Translation: People had money to spend and felt comfortable about
making big ticket purchases.
--
"Even as the Times defended Echelon as "a necessity"
in 1999, evidence already existed that the Clintonites
had misused electronic surveillance for political
purposes. Intelligence officials told Insight magazine
in 1997 that they had spied on a 1993 conference of
Asian and Pacific world leaders in Seattle hosted by
Clinton and some of that information was passed on to
big Democratic corporate donors for use against their
competitors."
http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/60314.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Goo Goo" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
31 Jan 2006 10:51:17 PM |
|
|
Americans' personal savings rate dipped into negative territory in
2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other
big-ticket
items.
Translation: People had money to spend and felt comfortable about
making big ticket purchases.
Translation: People were forced to find transportation for that suburban
Walmart nightshift job they got.
"OrionCA" <OrionCA@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:lk90u11bt5na7cl1i526h2c57lfe3tgjt0@4ax.com...
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:41:57 GMT, "See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net>
wrote:
Americans' personal savings rate dipped into negative territory in
2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other
big-ticket
items.
Translation: People had money to spend and felt comfortable about
making big ticket purchases.
--
"Even as the Times defended Echelon as "a necessity"
in 1999, evidence already existed that the Clintonites
had misused electronic surveillance for political
purposes. Intelligence officials told Insight magazine
in 1997 that they had spied on a 1993 conference of
Asian and Pacific world leaders in Seattle hosted by
Clinton and some of that information was passed on to
big Democratic corporate donors for use against their
competitors."
http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/60314.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "john fernbach" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
31 Jan 2006 11:24:08 PM |
|
|
It's not just "Bush's depression."
Part of this depression, if that's what it is, is driven by debt. And
Americans have been largely operating a debt-driven economy since the
1980s, if not since the 1940s. Huge government debts, large corporate
debts, very high levels of individual consumer debt. And recently, for
the past 10-15 years, very heavy consumer reliance on credit cards.
Part of this depression also is being driven by the loss of American
industrial jobs to China and other Third World countries, thanks to
global free trade. And global free trade has been the preferred policy
of the American political class, of both the Republican and Democratic
parties, since Ronald Reagan's administration in the 1980s - if not
before.
Under the Democratic administration of Bill Clinton in the 1990s, in
fact, there was bipartisan cooperation between the President and the
Republican Congress to push through the NAFTA treaty and the GATT
Treaty - two important free trade measures that Republicans began
pushing in the '80s during the Reagan/Bush era.
Global free trade, or at least the appearance of global free trade, is
also not just a politician's dream. It's what most of American
manufacturing industry and most of American agribusiness wants, or at
least pretends to want, because it's the most politically acceptable
excuse for aggressive American policies to capture foreign markets for
US products. Products that US farmers, corporations and small business
turn out in such massive amounts that we can't possibly consume all of
them at home.
So "depression," if that's what we've got right now, isn't just a
Republican problem, and it isn't just a Democratic problem. It's
rooted in patterns of economic activivity that both political parties
tend to favor, and it's rooted in a kind of economic rhetoric that
American business, American agribusiness and many American business
publications -- e.g. Forbes, the Wall Street Journal, and Business Week
-- find to be Holy Gospel.
I really dislike the Bush administration, but let's recognize this
economic depression for what it is - which is a natural, inevitable
feature of American capitalism.
Economic depression in fact is a regular, recurring feature of
capitalism, and this nation has experienced depressions and recessions
at regular intervals since the Panic of 1837.
Now we're getting hit again. Except this time, the ordinary problem of
cyclical, recurring depression is mixed in with a more serious threat
-- the breakdown of Western domination over the Third World, and
especially of the imperialistic Western control that countries like
Britain, France, Germany and Russia - with some US participation --
once exercised over China.
And with foreign controls gone, China is developing its own form of
aggressive, export-oriented capitalism - an export-oriented capitalism
that puts traditional US markets at risk. A Chinese capitalism that
insists on dumping cheap manufactured products onto some of the same
markets that US corporations would like to dominate, and that in this
way puts American profits and American production at risk.
Another aggravating factor of the current US economic slump, obviously,
is the rise of "global outsourcing" within American capitalism, and the
ability of American-based corporations to ship many of their IT jobs
and their administrative jobs to low-wage Third World countries like
India, via the Internet. What "global outsourcing" means for the
American working person, of course, is that in the name of "free trade"
and "competitiveness" and a lot of other comfortable sounding hokum, we
now get to compete with the badly paid workers of Asia on the famous
level playing field. So that over time, the level of our wages and the
level of Asian wages ought to converge.
"Bye, bye, Miss American Pie
Drove my Chevy to the levee, but the levee was dry --"
When you put it all together, American capitalism, and of course the
larger system of global capitalism in which it's embedded, is going to
kick our asses economically, until we're so sore we can never sit down
again.
In the name of "free trade" and "free markets" and "democracy" and
"economic progress," our standard of living is being equalized with the
standard of living of India and China, while enormously overpaid CEOs
of American corporations get huge rewards for organizing the levelling,
and while the richest 10 percent of the American population, the one
that owns the vast bulk of the stock, profits from our growing poverty.
And it ain't Bush alone that's doing this. Bush is a more extreme
cheerleader for the process than the Democrats are; Bush in fact is
terrible, and he has to go. But if you think that American capitalism
will be "kinder and gentler" to working people when the Democrats
inevitably regain the White House and the Congress, as they must -- if
you think that a Democratic win alone is going to reverse the basic
heartlessness of the unregulated "free market" -- well, guess again.
.
|
|
|
| User: "E.E.bud keith" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
31 Jan 2006 11:52:17 PM |
|
|
"john fernbach" <fernbach1948@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1138771448.459949.119860@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
It's not just "Bush's depression."
Part of this depression, if that's what it is, is driven by debt. And
Americans have been largely operating a debt-driven economy since the
1980s, if not since the 1940s. Huge government debts, large corporate
debts, very high levels of individual consumer debt. And recently, for
the past 10-15 years, very heavy consumer reliance on credit cards.
Part of this depression also is being driven by the loss of American
industrial jobs to China and other Third World countries, thanks to
global free trade. And global free trade has been the preferred policy
of the American political class, of both the Republican and Democratic
parties, since Ronald Reagan's administration in the 1980s - if not
before.
Under the Democratic administration of Bill Clinton in the 1990s, in
fact, there was bipartisan cooperation between the President and the
Republican Congress to push through the NAFTA treaty and the GATT
Treaty - two important free trade measures that Republicans began
pushing in the '80s during the Reagan/Bush era.
Global free trade, or at least the appearance of global free trade, is
also not just a politician's dream. It's what most of American
manufacturing industry and most of American agribusiness wants, or at
least pretends to want, because it's the most politically acceptable
excuse for aggressive American policies to capture foreign markets for
US products. Products that US farmers, corporations and small business
turn out in such massive amounts that we can't possibly consume all of
them at home.
So "depression," if that's what we've got right now, isn't just a
Republican problem, and it isn't just a Democratic problem. It's
rooted in patterns of economic activivity that both political parties
tend to favor, and it's rooted in a kind of economic rhetoric that
American business, American agribusiness and many American business
publications -- e.g. Forbes, the Wall Street Journal, and Business Week
-- find to be Holy Gospel.
I really dislike the Bush administration, but let's recognize this
economic depression for what it is - which is a natural, inevitable
feature of American capitalism.
Economic depression in fact is a regular, recurring feature of
capitalism, and this nation has experienced depressions and recessions
at regular intervals since the Panic of 1837.
Now we're getting hit again. Except this time, the ordinary problem of
cyclical, recurring depression is mixed in with a more serious threat
-- the breakdown of Western domination over the Third World, and
especially of the imperialistic Western control that countries like
Britain, France, Germany and Russia - with some US participation --
once exercised over China.
And with foreign controls gone, China is developing its own form of
aggressive, export-oriented capitalism - an export-oriented capitalism
that puts traditional US markets at risk. A Chinese capitalism that
insists on dumping cheap manufactured products onto some of the same
markets that US corporations would like to dominate, and that in this
way puts American profits and American production at risk.
Another aggravating factor of the current US economic slump, obviously,
is the rise of "global outsourcing" within American capitalism, and the
ability of American-based corporations to ship many of their IT jobs
and their administrative jobs to low-wage Third World countries like
India, via the Internet. What "global outsourcing" means for the
American working person, of course, is that in the name of "free trade"
and "competitiveness" and a lot of other comfortable sounding hokum, we
now get to compete with the badly paid workers of Asia on the famous
level playing field. So that over time, the level of our wages and the
level of Asian wages ought to converge.
"Bye, bye, Miss American Pie
Drove my Chevy to the levee, but the levee was dry --"
When you put it all together, American capitalism, and of course the
larger system of global capitalism in which it's embedded, is going to
kick our asses economically, until we're so sore we can never sit down
again.
In the name of "free trade" and "free markets" and "democracy" and
"economic progress," our standard of living is being equalized with the
standard of living of India and China, while enormously overpaid CEOs
of American corporations get huge rewards for organizing the levelling,
and while the richest 10 percent of the American population, the one
that owns the vast bulk of the stock, profits from our growing poverty.
And it ain't Bush alone that's doing this. Bush is a more extreme
cheerleader for the process than the Democrats are; Bush in fact is
terrible, and he has to go. But if you think that American capitalism
will be "kinder and gentler" to working people when the Democrats
inevitably regain the White House and the Congress, as they must -- if
you think that a Democratic win alone is going to reverse the basic
heartlessness of the unregulated "free market" -- well, guess again.
Spoken like a dyed in the wool marxist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "john fernbach" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
03 Feb 2006 10:56:24 AM |
|
|
Thank you, Mr. Keith.
I'm not actually dyed, nor am I made of wool.
But I have read Marx -- agreed with some of it, disagreed with other
parts.
But who cares what the damned analysis is CALLED?
I mean, forget about what Marx wrote or didn't writ. Look at such
capitalist business magazines as "Business Week," "Fortune," and
"Forbes."
Look at what US government sources and other respectable, capitalist,
mainstream sources are saying about
(a) globalization,
(b) business outsourcing,
(c) levels of business, government and consumer debt, and
(d) trends in American wages, especially for the lower middle class.
What these perfectly respectable capitalist sources of information are
indicating is that the American working person is GETTING SCREWED, and
that millions of good jobs are going overseas, along with large chunks
of American investment capital -- because if you have some money to put
into the stock market, you can probably get a better rate of return in
China, or Singapore, or India, or maybe Thailand or Malaysia than
you're going to get from investing your money here in the US.
What this means, Mr. Keith, is that the "American way of life" is AT
RISK. And the question, to quote a famous book by Lenin, is
"What is to be done?"
I'm not saying that Marx figured out the answer to this 150 years ago,
or that the Russian Communists got the answer right in 1917, or
even that the British Labour Party and the Social Democratic Party of
Sweden have discovered how to keep working families from being crushed
when capitalist economies go bad.
But the damned economy is going bad -- at least it's going bad for
millions of middle-class Americans who have traditionally relied on
factory jobs, or jobs in middle management or even in the IT industry,
to maintain a very comfortable lifestyle. Some of these people are now
working in fast food to make ends meet, or are surviving by repeatedly
refinancing their houses and getting themselves ever deeper into debt.
What do we do to change the system to keep these people from having
their jobs destroyed, and their savings lost, and their futures
endangered?
Whatever it is, we're going to have to look at the basic trends in
American capitalism that are causing the problem. If we just elect
Democrats to stop the rotten things that the Republicans are doing, or
elect Republicans to stop the rotten things the Democrats are doing,
we're going to fail the test.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "OrionCA" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
01 Feb 2006 05:54:45 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 04:51:17 GMT, "Goo Goo" <kshipira@unity.com>
wrote:
2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other
big-ticket
items.
Translation: People had money to spend and felt comfortable about
making big ticket purchases.
Translation: People were forced to find transportation for that suburban
Walmart nightshift job they got.
A job is something you get when your parents kick your lazy ***** out of
the house, what would you know about it?
--
"Even as the Times defended Echelon as "a necessity"
in 1999, evidence already existed that the Clintonites
had misused electronic surveillance for political
purposes. Intelligence officials told Insight magazine
in 1997 that they had spied on a 1993 conference of
Asian and Pacific world leaders in Seattle hosted by
Clinton and some of that information was passed on to
big Democratic corporate donors for use against their
competitors."
http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/60314.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "See It Now!" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
01 Feb 2006 03:42:10 PM |
|
|
"OrionCA" <OrionCA@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:5b81u15ldfijv6952g72ba26ur87jfhepq@4ax.com...
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 04:51:17 GMT, "Goo Goo" <kshipira@unity.com>
wrote:
2005,
something that hasn't happened since the Great Depression. Consumers
depleted their savings to finance the purchases of cars and other
big-ticket
items.
Translation: People had money to spend and felt comfortable about
making big ticket purchases.
Translation: People were forced to find transportation for that suburban
Walmart nightshift job they got.
A job is something you get when your parents kick your lazy ***** out of
the house, what would you know about it?
Tee, hee...........
Bush is setting a good example. What was he when Ma Barker Bush kicked him
out, 45?
.
|
|
|
| User: "OrionCA" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
01 Feb 2006 11:42:11 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 21:42:10 GMT, "See It Now!" <ccc@atiheart.net>
wrote:
A job is something you get when your parents kick your lazy ***** out of
the house, what would you know about it?
Tee, hee...........
Bush is setting a good example. What was he when Ma Barker Bush kicked him
out, 45?
25, actually. He's living proof that slackers don't have an excuse
for laying about all day, saying, "Oh, I'll NEVER get anywhere, so why
try?"
--
"Even as the Times defended Echelon as "a necessity"
in 1999, evidence already existed that the Clintonites
had misused electronic surveillance for political
purposes. Intelligence officials told Insight magazine
in 1997 that they had spied on a 1993 conference of
Asian and Pacific world leaders in Seattle hosted by
Clinton and some of that information was passed on to
big Democratic corporate donors for use against their
competitors."
http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/60314.htm
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "john fernbach" |
|
| Title: Re: Welcome to Bush's Depression |
03 Feb 2006 11:14:49 AM |
|
|
OrionCA writes: "A job is something you get when your parents kick
your lazy ***** out of the house."
_____
It's not "politically correct" for me as a leftist to admit this, but
there's some truth in your comment, Orion.
SOME truth. I mean, I know slacker kids who are just hanging around
the house not working and not even looking for work. And here in
Washington, D.C., I've had a lot of contact with homeless street people
who are just as bad in expecting to survive through perpetual handouts.
But Orion - do some reading in your business magazines sometime, and
spend some time studying the history of the Federal Reserve Board and
its efforts to use federal monetary policy to fight inflation.
And while you're at it, read the "Wall Street Journal" editorial page
sometime on the subject of immigration.
The fact is, the corporations and the government bureaucrats and the
business magazines who help the politicians to set economic policy
don't WANT everyone in the US to have a job.
They WANT a fair amount of unemployment -- not too much, mind you, but
just enough -- because unemployment is the way that they discipline the
Americans who are still working -- discipline us into working for
relatively low wages, and not demanding more.
The labor market, so called, is a lot like other markets -- supply and
demand determine price. So when there's too much demand for labor, and
too little supply -- the sellers (that is, working Americans) can
demand and obtain a higher price.
That's "inflationary," as the Federal Reserve Board and many of the
business magazines see it. And so whenever unemployment in the United
States seems to be getting too low, to the point where the economy is
supposedly "heating up," the Federal Reserve Board generally raises
short-term interest rates, so as to "cool" the economy -- which is to
say, they make it more costly for businesses to borrow money to expand,
and more costly for consumers to live on credit -- so that economic
activity slows.
Result: Unemployment RISES AGAIN, and "pressure on wages" decreases,
meaning that American working people stop grumbling so much and live
with the wages they have. And that reduces inflation, which is really
pleasing to the richest Americans who survive by investing in the
corporate bond market.
For the benefit of the bond market and the richest investors, therefore
-- for the benefit of the people who are running American capitalism --
unemployment has to be maintained at a so-called "natural" level. Some
Americans have to be jobless, so that wages will stay "reasonable" and
corporate profits and the profits of the bond trades will be
maintained.
What this means, Orion, is that even though some people really are lazy
slackers who don't want to work, the government and the corporations
are working hard to make sure that there won't be enough jobs available
for them, even if they were to want those jobs.
And the situation is made worse, every year, by "productivity gains" in
American business and industry. Read the fine print, and you'll see
that "productivity" basically means "labor productivity," the amount of
economic value created by the average worker putting it the average
week.
When productivity increases -- which is what the government and the
corporations always want it to do -- it becomes possible for the
economy to turn out the same amount of goods with LESS LABOR -- meaning
higher unemployment, unless the economy grows enough to take up the
slack.
So while slackers and lazy panhandlers do exist, and are a problem, the
system is stacked to produce unemployment even without their
contributions. If slackers didn't exist, American capitalism would
have to create them. Although what the corporations prefer to slackers
are people who genuinely want to work -- and can't. They're the ones
who help to keep wages for those who do work within "non-inflationary"
guidelines.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|