WEST WING - how do I get a job like that?



 Politics > Politics-USA > WEST WING - how do I get a job like that?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: ""
Date: 15 May 2006 12:03:19 PM
Object: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that?
As I was watching the West Wing finale last night, I was thinking to
myself: 'Those people have cool jobs.' Secretary of State. Press
Secretary. Presidential advisors. Et cetera.
How does one go about getting that type of job in national or State
government?
..
I have a friend who works for a PA senator handling phone calls from
citizens, and when I asked him how he got the job, he just said, "I was
a student intern and moved up from there." Since I'm not a student, I
can not follow that path. What other alternatives exist?
Degree in public policy? Degree in political science? Law?
Thanks for your help/advice,
Troy Heagy
.

User: "Ken from Chicago"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 15 May 2006 03:13:43 PM
<Troy.Heagy@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147712599.458614.13780@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

As I was watching the West Wing finale last night, I was thinking to
myself: 'Those people have cool jobs.' Secretary of State. Press
Secretary. Presidential advisors. Et cetera.

How does one go about getting that type of job in national or State
government?

.

I have a friend who works for a PA senator handling phone calls from
citizens, and when I asked him how he got the job, he just said, "I was
a student intern and moved up from there." Since I'm not a student, I
can not follow that path. What other alternatives exist?

Degree in public policy? Degree in political science? Law?


Thanks for your help/advice,
Troy Heagy

Be a zillionaire, or know a bunch.
-- Ken from Chicago
.

User: "abracadabra"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 15 May 2006 03:00:22 PM
<Troy.Heagy@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147712599.458614.13780@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

As I was watching the West Wing finale last night, I was thinking to
myself: 'Those people have cool jobs.' Secretary of State. Press
Secretary. Presidential advisors. Et cetera.

How does one go about getting that type of job in national or State
government?

Probably get politically active when you're young, work for campaigns, do
the grunt work and make your way up the ladder. Rove started out in the
College Republicans - interestingly they seem to raise in rank by trying to
label their opponents as "fags" and that seems to be how they run national
campaigns as well.
.

User: "record hunter"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 15 May 2006 05:47:44 PM
1. Know someone
2. Blow someone (but don't tell your boss or your best friends)
.
User: "karl"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 15 May 2006 05:51:16 PM
"record hunter" <record.hunter@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147733264.409935.180980@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...

1. Know someone

2. Blow someone (but don't tell your boss or your best friends)

3. Buy someone.
.

User: "RichA"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 16 May 2006 12:49:28 PM
But Lewinsky never rose above intern, right? So the b.j. doesn't
always work.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 21 May 2006 09:40:12 PM
RichA wrote:

But Lewinsky never rose above intern, right? So the b.j. doesn't
always work.

How can you say that after she became host of Mr. Personality?!?!
.
User: "ANIM8Rfsk"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 22 May 2006 01:02:09 AM
in article 1148265612.050697.313000@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,
at
wrote on 5/21/06 7:40 PM:


RichA wrote:

But Lewinsky never rose above intern, right? So the b.j. doesn't
always work.


How can you say that after she became host of Mr. Personality?!?!

IIRC she got a high paying job upon leaving the White House that a White
House staffer arranged, and a lot of people thought was hush money. It only
lasted 6 months or so though.
.
User: "Ha-Emet"

Title: The New Right and Anarcho Capitalism 24 May 2006 09:55:57 PM
Anarcho-capitalism has recently had a considerable vogue in the West
where it has helped put the role of the State back on the political
agenda. It has become a major ideological challenge to the dominant
liberalism which sees a role for government in the protection of
property. The anarcho-capitalists would like to dismantle government
and allow complete laissez-faire in the economy. Its adherents propose
that all public services be turned over to private entrepreneurs, even
public spaces like town halls, streets and parks. Free market
capitalism, they insist, is hindered not enhanced by the State.
Anarcho-capitalists share Adam Smith's confidence that somehow private
interest will translate itself into public good rather than public
squalor. They are convinced that the 'natural laws' of economics can
do without the support of positive man-made laws. The 'invisible hand'
of the market will be enough to bring social order.
Article: http://pnews.org/ArT/TrU/AnarchoNewRight.shtml
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In Our Genes
Our destiny isn't entirely our genes nor cultural memes.
Behavior is not determined by genes, although it can be influenced by them.
Because we are capable of thinking we are free to influence our genes and our
environment. My intellect tells me we might be able to change our destiny.
We are not destined for poverty and exploitation nor is it pretermined that we
will behave badly. We think and have the free will to change our destiny and
refuse to be exploited. These things are a product of culture memes; economic
systems, religion and traditions, all of which can be changed and must change
to end thousands of years of exploitation and expropriation. That is highest
human moral imperative.
http://pnews.org/ArT/ZioN/HmI.shtml
-------------------------------------
By the way, 8,000 lab animals died at Tulane because of Katrina. If we
don't care very much about animals we can't care very much about us. AND
how many microorganisms were released from the many HOT LABS where
bioweapons are/were being developed at Tulane? When will we see the
consequences of that release of deadly microbes? When will we learn the
truth about the HOT LABS at Tulane?
Hank
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suitcases Full of Money and Not a Dime for You
Suitcases Full of Money
Each time the CIA went shopping for Warlords to fight the Taliban they
took with them a suitcase full of money. Each time the U.S. went looking
for a coalition to fight the Taliban they took a check. * Part of the
special favors to insure this support was a $2.5 billion IMF loan pushed
through by the United States and the lifting of sanctions for Pakistan's
testing nuclear weapons.**
Go HERE: http://pnews.org/ArT/ImP/SpO.shtml
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 Million Year Old Man
Who or what was Toumai? Those who found his skull in 2001 insist he is the
oldest human ancestor, a small fellow who lived by an African lake some 7
million years ago. Doubters have maintained that the skull belongs to an
ancient chimpanzee or a gorilla.
More recent findings, announced last week (April 7 - 2005), include teeth
and jaw fragments unearthed in Toumai's neighborhood. Together with a
reconstruction of his cracked skull, they support the idea that he was
more man than ape.
http://pnews.org/news/index.php/OldMan
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did ancestral humans, chimps interbreed?
New scientific findings indicate that ancestral humans split from
chimpanzee forebears more recently than previously thought and raise the
possibility that the two nascent species hybridized before making their
final separation.
The surprising findings reveal a much more complicated birth of the human
and chimpanzee species than shown by previous research. They also call
into question the place on the primate family tree of fossils that
scientists had thought were the bones of ancestral humans, but which are
older than the newly determined time that the species diverged.
http://pnews.org/news/index.php/InterBreeding
Aging and Addiction
'PAIN-FREE'
So-called "late onset" substance abuse is often linked to medical problems
and the emotional traumas that can accompany old age, from isolation to
the death of friends and family.
Alcohol remains the most commonly abused substance in the elderly,
followed by prescription painkillers such as OxyContin, made by Purdue
Pharama, and Vicodin, by Abbott Laboratories Inc , and anti-anxiety pills
such as Valium, by Roche, and Xanax, by Pfizer .
http://pnews.org/news/index.php/AgingAndAddiction
Talking Points
Just a few of the many talking points articles at:
http://pnews.org/news/index.php/TalkingPoints
# Anti-Semitism and Hypocrisy in Dutch Society
# The Neocons
# The Political Platform of Hamas
# Islamization of the Palestinians
# Addicted to Oil, or just a *****?
# What Would the Founding Fathers Do?
# Case Against Rachel Corrie
# Conflict Tourism
"The problem is not that there are problems. The problem is expecting
otherwise and thinking that having problems is a problem." -Theodore Rubin
# Dangerous Delusions: HAMAS and Fatah
# Mandate Without the Mythology
# Fabrications of the Bush Administration
# After the War Comes Cancer
# Jews: Don't Be Here - Don't Be There
# Why Phalangists Went Into Sabra and Shatilla
# What Really Happened at Jenin?
ETC.....
http://pnews.org/news/index.php/TalkingPoints
American Gulag
"The government's metaphorical use of a `war on terrorism' and its
labeling of `enemy combatants' in the `war on terrorism' are nothing more
than a sham and a trick to avoid the constraints of the Constitution. By
couching a criminal offense in terms of a `war' on that particular
criminal offense, the government is trying to circumvent the
constitutional guarantees associated with charging people with a
particular crime. Through a sleight of hand, the government is attempting
to draw on the president's warmaking powers by making it look as though
what it is doing is really no different from what it does when it takes
prisoners of war in a real wartime situation. The situation would be akin
to one in which the government starts taking suspected drug dealers into
custody and detaining them indefinitely as `enemy combatants' in the `war
on drug dealing' or Mafia members as `enemy combatants' in the
government's `war on organized crime.'"
"Torturing prisoners, denying them legal safeguards and essentially
refuting their existence is what rogue regimes and lawless nations do.
Reading about it in China's Xinhua News Agency is especially
disconcerting. The Bush administration is not only doing all this now, but
making systematic plans to create an American gulag of prisons and
prisoners without names and cells without numbers. From the old Soviet
Union to Communist China to the banana republics of Latin America and
Castro's Cuba, that's what others do." (Seattle Times)
The founders must be turning over in their graves.
Stop the Tyranny
http://pnews.org/news/index.php/AmGulag
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kerry was the Spoiler
!!!Why Were So Many Afraid of Ralph Nader?
!!!If he was accused of being a "spoiler," what was there to spoil?
Why are so many afraid of Ralph Nader? Nader had only been polling 5 to 7
percent of the registered voters, and while not enough to win, it was a
substantial number nevertheless and these are traditionally much younger
Americans who have become disenchanted with the system. If we have a
democracy why shouldn't even the smallest vote have a voice?
If there was as much support for Nader as there was opposition to Bush,
Nader would have been the strongest candidate. If Nader ran on the
Democratic ticket he would have conducted a far better campaign than
Kerry.
If all those who were against George Bush had voted their conscience Nader
would have won. It would have been the upset of all upsets? Nader wasn't
the spoiler. It was Kerry who was the spoiler.
http://pnews.org/news/index.php/BringBackNader
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bush and Proportionality
Bush, Proportionality and War Crimes
War is a fundamental collapse of human reason and failure of imagination,
and should always be an absolute last resort undertaken only in strict
adherence with the charter of the United Nations. The current war and
occupation of Iraq were undertaken in disregard of the most fundamental
principles of international law and with obvious contempt for truth,
posterity, and the morality which should guide all human actions. The
result has been the occupation and colonization of Iraq and the
destruction of its economy and increased violence and insecurity for the
overwhelming majority of the Iraqi population. The world cannot sit by
passively and watch the continued deterioration of the future of our
planet.
Who needs truth? Here is how it really works. The Bush administration
repeats or starts the lies and faithful Bush supporters repeat the lies
over and over again. It doesn't matter if it is the truth. It is enough
that the president said it. It is the Washington Party Line (similar to
what the right would say about the Moscow and the Communist Party Line)
and it is the "gospel truth" to those patriots who have wrapped themselves
in the American flag and to the media which dispenses as-if it was handed
down directly from Mt Sinai. It is the truth because it is their faith to
believe in it and the truth of the matter is, believers don't need the
truth.
http://pnews.org/news/index.php/Proportionality
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Everything begins at The Worm Hole: http://pnews.org/
=======================================================
SUBSCRIBE TO THE ONLY TWO LISTS YOU NEED ON THE INTERNUT
=======================================================
1. pnews-news - mailing list - (NEWS Only)
Send "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" in subject
To: ----> pnews-news-request(at)inyourface.info
=======================================================
2. pnews-views - mailing list - (VIEWS Only)
Send "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" as subject
To: ---> pnews-views-request(at)inyourface.info
=======================================================
Hank Roth {net since 1982} - BIO: http://pnews.org/bio/
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NEVER pay for a podcast again:
Check it out - http://tinyurl.com/mnr7r
.

User: ""

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 22 May 2006 06:25:37 PM
ANIM8Rfsk wrote:

in article 1148265612.050697.313000@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,

at
wrote on 5/21/06 7:40 PM:


RichA wrote:

But Lewinsky never rose above intern, right? So the b.j. doesn't
always work.


How can you say that after she became host of Mr. Personality?!?!

IIRC she got a high paying job upon leaving the White House that a White
House staffer arranged, and a lot of people thought was hush money. It only
lasted 6 months or so though.

Yes, if I'm not mistaken it was at Revlon, the cosmetics company.
.
User: "ANIM8Rfsk"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 22 May 2006 06:41:37 PM
in article 1148340337.012519.294270@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,
at
wrote on 5/22/06 4:25 PM:


ANIM8Rfsk wrote:

in article 1148265612.050697.313000@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,

at
wrote on 5/21/06 7:40 PM:


RichA wrote:

But Lewinsky never rose above intern, right? So the b.j. doesn't
always work.


How can you say that after she became host of Mr. Personality?!?!

IIRC she got a high paying job upon leaving the White House that a White
House staffer arranged, and a lot of people thought was hush money. It only
lasted 6 months or so though.


Yes, if I'm not mistaken it was at Revlon, the cosmetics company.

Ah. I'm not sure I ever heard where it was; always figured it was something
more closely government related.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 23 May 2006 09:22:07 PM
ANIM8Rfsk wrote:

in article 1148340337.012519.294270@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,

at
wrote on 5/22/06 4:25 PM:

Yes, if I'm not mistaken it was at Revlon, the cosmetics company.

Ah. I'm not sure I ever heard where it was; always figured it was something
more closely government related.

Here's a linke from the Washington Post:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/job013198.htm
Quote:
"Lewinsky on Jan. 13 received a letter of great value to her own
future: Revlon, which had granted her a job interview at the urging of
Clinton's friend Vernon E. Jordan Jr., was offering her just the kind
of corporate job in New York she had been trying to land for months."
.



User: ""

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 22 May 2006 11:12:44 AM
Here's the breakdown for Bush's cabinet:
-ph.d. poli sci
-masters - poli sci
-b.s. poli sci
-b.s. poli sci / masters- education administration / law
-(3) law degress
-ph.d economics / law
-(2) mba
-b.s. economics/business
-ph.d. chemical engineering
-navy officer/administrative assistant/congress/promoted to the cabinet
There doesn't seem to be any one specific area, although political
science, law, and business are clearly the most popular fields for
these Cabinet members. WOW. Don't these people have a life? They
must have spent the first 30 years of their lives doing nothing but
studying, studying, studying. Truly amazing.
..
.





User: "Osiris88"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 15 May 2006 05:58:12 PM
wrote:

As I was watching the West Wing finale last night, I was thinking to
myself: 'Those people have cool jobs.' Secretary of State. Press
Secretary. Presidential advisors. Et cetera.

How does one go about getting that type of job in national or State
government?

.

I have a friend who works for a PA senator handling phone calls from
citizens, and when I asked him how he got the job, he just said, "I was
a student intern and moved up from there." Since I'm not a student, I
can not follow that path. What other alternatives exist?

Degree in public policy? Degree in political science? Law?


Thanks for your help/advice,
Troy Heagy

Get a degree in something that would matter to your party's future.
For example, economics, foreign policy/international relations,
political science, etc. At the same time, try to volunteer for
whichever party you like, and get that expereince as well. At the
start it might be work like putting up signs or distributing flyers but
you can work your way up. That's a great way to make contacts and when
you get the opportunity, speak up and tell whomever that you'd like to
work for them, and keep reminding them every now then (whithout
bothering them, of course, they are busy). With some luck you might
find your way in.
Be prepared for some frustration here or there. A lot of voters
don't want to hear it, when you go door to door, and you may even find
some bad apples in your own party, in the group you're trying to work
with.
Good luck.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 16 May 2006 11:16:43 AM
EXCELLENT advice. Especially the part about economics. I never
thought of that, but it makes perfect sense since the government
collects money, spends it, and tries to boost the economy as much as
possible.
President Bartlet on the tv show has a degree in economics. Also a
Nobel prize. Did he have degrees in anything else?
You mentioned bad apples.
I already found one. He was corrupt with power, so he sat on a
Maryland Welfare bill, refusing to let it come up for vote (meaning
hungry/homeless people would lose their checks). Why? Simply because
he could.
He was working for the other party (democrats), which surprised me. I
always thought democrats were in favor of handing out money to the
needy. To see one refusing to release a welfare bill was a shocker.
Fortunately the republican & democratic legislators organized as one
team & forced the guy to release the Welfare bill out of committee.
..
Osiris88 wrote:

Get a degree in something that would matter to your party's future.
For example, economics, foreign policy/international relations,
political science, etc. At the same time, try to volunteer for
whichever party you like, and get that expereince as well.
Speak up and tell whomever that you'd like to
work for them, and keep reminding them every now then (whithout
bothering them, of course, they are busy).

.
User: "Osiris88"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 22 May 2006 01:12:58 AM
wrote:

EXCELLENT advice. Especially the part about economics. I never
thought of that, but it makes perfect sense since the government
collects money, spends it, and tries to boost the economy as much as
possible.

President Bartlet on the tv show has a degree in economics. Also a
Nobel prize. Did he have degrees in anything else?

You mentioned bad apples.

I already found one. He was corrupt with power, so he sat on a
Maryland Welfare bill, refusing to let it come up for vote (meaning
hungry/homeless people would lose their checks). Why? Simply because
he could.

He was working for the other party (democrats), which surprised me. I
always thought democrats were in favor of handing out money to the
needy. To see one refusing to release a welfare bill was a shocker.
Fortunately the republican & democratic legislators organized as one
team & forced the guy to release the Welfare bill out of committee.

I'm a Democrat and I always cringe when I see my own guys playing
politics in the manner you suggested. I'm sure you know that both
sides have bad apples. A lot of the time, though, you may see people
voting against their own platform because a particular bill is
connected to pork or other legislation that is not agreeable.

.


Osiris88 wrote:

Get a degree in something that would matter to your party's future.
For example, economics, foreign policy/international relations,
political science, etc. At the same time, try to volunteer for
whichever party you like, and get that expereince as well.
Speak up and tell whomever that you'd like to
work for them, and keep reminding them every now then (whithout
bothering them, of course, they are busy).

.

User: "Gary S. Simon"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 21 May 2006 04:31:10 PM
In article <1147796203.427814.234170@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
"videonovels@yahoo.com" <videonovels@yahoo.com> wrote:

President Bartlet on the tv show has a degree in economics. Also a
Nobel prize. Did he have degrees in anything else?

I have a vague recollection that Bartlet once made reference to
something his Civil Procedure professor had said. I can't imagine
anyone taking Civil Procedure outside of law school.
.
User: "ANIM8Rfsk"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 21 May 2006 07:14:54 PM
in article garscosi-B0D578.17340221052006@news.west.earthlink.net, Gary S.
Simon at
wrote on 5/21/06 2:31 PM:

In article <1147796203.427814.234170@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
"videonovels@yahoo.com" <videonovels@yahoo.com> wrote:

President Bartlet on the tv show has a degree in economics. Also a
Nobel prize. Did he have degrees in anything else?



I have a vague recollection that Bartlet once made reference to
something his Civil Procedure professor had said. I can't imagine
anyone taking Civil Procedure outside of law school.

Didn't he once say, in a meeting in the oval office, "we're ALL lawyers
here"?
.
User: "Pat Farrell"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 21 May 2006 08:09:40 PM
ANIM8Rfsk wrote:

Didn't he once say, in a meeting in the oval office, "we're ALL lawyers
here"?

I'm pretty sure Josh said that to Sam before they went up
to meet the hanging investigator about Leo's drinking.
--
Pat
.





User: "theget"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 15 May 2006 06:03:26 PM
wrote:

As I was watching the West Wing finale last night, I was thinking to
myself: 'Those people have cool jobs.' Secretary of State. Press
Secretary. Presidential advisors. Et cetera.

How does one go about getting that type of job in national or State
government?

.

I have a friend who works for a PA senator handling phone calls from
citizens, and when I asked him how he got the job, he just said, "I was
a student intern and moved up from there." Since I'm not a student, I
can not follow that path. What other alternatives exist?

Degree in public policy? Degree in political science? Law?


Thanks for your help/advice,
Troy Heagy

I think you might enjoy reading Robert Heinlein's Take Back Your
Government, http://www.wegrokit.com/take_back_your_government.htm
A how to for the best game ever invented for adults. And the best part
is, everyone plays even if they really don't want to, and even if they
think they're not playing.
HTH,
Theget
.

User: "Chris"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 15 May 2006 12:20:54 PM
In this administration you just have to know somebody so if you want to be
Secretary of Treasury cashier at Ralph's is good enough.
.
User: "BTR1701"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 15 May 2006 12:23:30 PM
In article <WL2ag.72518$F_3.71519@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"Chris" <chrissiciliano@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

In this administration you just have to know somebody

That's how it works in *any* administration.
.
User: "Ken from Chicago"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 15 May 2006 03:14:28 PM
"BTR1701" <btr1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:btr1702-DDB0C3.13233015052006@news.giganews.com...

In article <WL2ag.72518$F_3.71519@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"Chris" <chrissiciliano@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

In this administration you just have to know somebody


That's how it works in *any* administration.

Especially know a FILTHY RICH somebody.
-- Ken from Chicago
.


User: "Brian Thorn"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 15 May 2006 05:39:34 PM
On Mon, 15 May 2006 17:20:54 GMT, "Chris"
<chrissiciliano@sbcglobal.net> wrote:


In this administration you just have to know somebody

What do you mean *this* Administration? Welcome to US government since
1776...
Brian
.
User: "Clell Harmon"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 15 May 2006 11:42:05 PM
Brian Thorn wrote:

On Mon, 15 May 2006 17:20:54 GMT, "Chris"
<chrissiciliano@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

In this administration you just have to know somebody


What do you mean *this* Administration? Welcome to US government since
1776...

Well, 1789 anyway.
.
User: "Brian Thorn"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 16 May 2006 12:20:49 PM
On Tue, 16 May 2006 04:42:05 GMT, Clell Harmon <c.harmon@mchsi.com>
wrote:

In this administration you just have to know somebody


What do you mean *this* Administration? Welcome to US government since
1776...


Well, 1789 anyway.

There were actually eight Presidents of the United States prior to
George Washington. History has mostly ignored them, because they
preceeded the US Constitution and were elected President by Congress
under the Articles of Confederation.
http://library.thinkquest.org/TQ0312172/early.html
They were John Hanson, Elias Boudinot, Thomas Mifflin, Richard Henry
Lee, John Hancock, Nathaniel Gorham, Arthur St. Clair, and Cyrus
Griffin.
Brian
.
User: "Milhouse Van Houten"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 16 May 2006 05:01:38 PM
"Brian Thorn" <bthorn64@cox.net> wrote in message
news:s12k625iln9lpuujf5lkh96h87rjvc2l5a@4ax.com...


There were actually eight Presidents of the United States prior to
George Washington. History has mostly ignored them, because they
preceeded the US Constitution and were elected President by Congress
under the Articles of Confederation.

http://library.thinkquest.org/TQ0312172/early.html

They were John Hanson, Elias Boudinot, Thomas Mifflin, Richard Henry
Lee, John Hancock, Nathaniel Gorham, Arthur St. Clair, and Cyrus
Griffin.

And the verdict: false
http://www.snopes.com/history/american/hanson.htm
.
User: "Brian Thorn"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 16 May 2006 05:59:19 PM
On Tue, 16 May 2006 15:01:38 -0700, "Milhouse Van Houten"
<btvs@myrealbox.com> wrote:

There were actually eight Presidents of the United States prior to
George Washington. History has mostly ignored them, because they
preceeded the US Constitution and were elected President by Congress
under the Articles of Confederation.

http://library.thinkquest.org/TQ0312172/early.html

They were John Hanson, Elias Boudinot, Thomas Mifflin, Richard Henry
Lee, John Hancock, Nathaniel Gorham, Arthur St. Clair, and Cyrus
Griffin.


And the verdict: false
http://www.snopes.com/history/american/hanson.htm

Hmm. There's a lot of gray area in that counter-UL. Snopes usually
does a better job knocking down ULs than this. For example, Snopes
says "there was no such thing as a USA until Hanson was dead..." but
then goes on to admit that yes, the Declaration of Independence and
the Articles of Confederation both do, in fact, refer to the USA. (And
both happened before Hanson's death in 1783.) They handwave that
argument away with some silliness about "a confederacy is not a
nation" (true, but then again no one is saying Hanson was the first
President of a nation called the USA either, but he was "President of
the United States in Congress Assembled" which to this ordinary reader
seems pretty damned close.
Or to put it another way, if you stop a citizen on the streets of the
USA and ask him or her when was the nation born, will they say 1776 or
1789? I'd wager greater than 99% of the respondents would say 1776.
Snopes is splitting hairs on this one. And its not like anyone is
demanding the capitol be renamed "Hanson, D.C."
Brian
.
User: "BTR1701"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 16 May 2006 08:16:15 PM
In article <qskk62dh9k9vni4fduiehkgr39l967fdto@4ax.com>,
Brian Thorn <bthorn64@cox.net> wrote:

On Tue, 16 May 2006 15:01:38 -0700, "Milhouse Van Houten"
<btvs@myrealbox.com> wrote:

There were actually eight Presidents of the United States prior to
George Washington. History has mostly ignored them, because they
preceeded the US Constitution and were elected President by Congress
under the Articles of Confederation.

http://library.thinkquest.org/TQ0312172/early.html

They were John Hanson, Elias Boudinot, Thomas Mifflin, Richard Henry
Lee, John Hancock, Nathaniel Gorham, Arthur St. Clair, and Cyrus
Griffin.


And the verdict: false
http://www.snopes.com/history/american/hanson.htm


Hmm. There's a lot of gray area in that counter-UL. Snopes usually
does a better job knocking down ULs than this. For example, Snopes
says "there was no such thing as a USA until Hanson was dead..." but
then goes on to admit that yes, the Declaration of Independence and
the Articles of Confederation both do, in fact, refer to the USA. (And
both happened before Hanson's death in 1783.) They handwave that
argument away with some silliness about "a confederacy is not a
nation" (true, but then again no one is saying Hanson was the first
President of a nation called the USA either, but he was "President of
the United States in Congress Assembled" which to this ordinary reader
seems pretty damned close.

Or to put it another way, if you stop a citizen on the streets of the
USA and ask him or her when was the nation born, will they say 1776 or
1789? I'd wager greater than 99% of the respondents would say 1776.

Actually, these days you'd be lucky to find two out of ten who would
even know the difference.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 17 May 2006 06:23:16 AM

Brian Thorn <bthorn64@cox.net> wrote:

Hmm. There's a lot of gray area in that counter-UL. Snopes usually
does a better job knocking down ULs than this. For example, Snopes
says "there was no such thing as a USA until Hanson was dead..." but
then goes on to admit that yes, the Declaration of Independence and
the Articles of Confederation both do, in fact, refer to the USA.

..
Actually they refer to these (plural) united (small letter) States (13
sovereign nations) of America (continent). In other words the
equivalent of saying the "united Nations of Europe" that existed during
WW2 to fight Hitler. The phrase "united Nations of Europe" does not
refer to the formation of a new country, but merely an alliance.
..
"The title of the confederacy so created was designated "the united
States of America," but no nation with that name was created by the
Articles of Confederation, any more than the formation of the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization resulted in the establishment of a nation
known as 'NATO.' "
..
.
User: "Brian Thorn"

Title: Re: WEST WING - how do I get a job like that? 17 May 2006 05:35:16 PM
On 17 May 2006 04:23:16 -0700, "videonovels@yahoo.com"
<videonovels@yahoo.com> wrote:

Hmm. There's a lot of gray area in that counter-UL. Snopes usually
does a better job knocking down ULs than this. For example, Snopes
says "there was no such thing as a USA until Hanson was dead..." but
then goes on to admit that yes, the Declaration of Independence and
the Articles of Confederation both do, in fact, refer to the USA.

Actually they refer to these (plural) united (small letter) States (13
sovereign nations) of America (continent).

No, the AoC specifically capitalized "United". "The name of the
Confederation shall be United States of America." So Snopes is getting
bogged down by the basic question, "What, exactly, is the United
States of America"? Is it only the nation that was born of the
Constitution in 1789? What was the entity pre-1789 that also called
itself the "United States of America"? When someone says "John Hanson
was President of the United States" is it automatically false because
the Constitution had not yet been written and adopted, even though the
Articles of Confederation also adopted that name for the 1781-1789
States? I think this is a very vague gray area. Snopes dismisses the
claim outright, and I think that's a dangerous point of view.
The simple fact that the States called themselves a "Confederation"
does not automatically make any claims to pre-1789 Presidents invalid.
For example, if the 1781-1789 States were not a nation but only a
Confederation, then what were the rebellious States in 1860-1865? They
called themselves a Confederacy but most certainly considered
themselves an independent nation.
Brian
.










  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER