| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"TheBuckDoesntStopHerePresident" |
| Date: |
21 Oct 2004 07:15:45 PM |
| Object: |
What about Bush's *Stolen Honor*? |
Can you help provide the military records that prove Lt. George W. Bush
completed his military commitment?
This is an issue of much greater significance than nitpicking Kerry's
military record, which he earned in combat in Viet Nam. Using all available
records, except for Bush's unsupported 'honorable discharge', one can only
conclude Bush was AWOL and/or a deserter during war time.
So do your patriotic duty for your "war president" and prove he hasn't sent
thousands of men and women to be injured or killed in Iraq while avoiding
fighting in Viet Nam himself and then apparently going AWOL.
--
The U.S. News analysis also showed that during the final two years of his
obligation, Bush did not comply with Air Force regulations that impose a
time limit on making up missed drills. What's more, he apparently never made
up five months of drills he missed in 1972, contrary to assertions by the
administration. White House officials did not respond to the analysis last
week but emphasized that Bush had "served honorably."
Some experts say they remain mystified as to how Bush obtained an honorable
discharge. Lawrence Korb, a former top Defense Department official in the
Reagan administration, says the military records clearly show that Bush "had
not fulfilled his obligation" and "should have been called to active duty."
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/040920/usnews/20guard.htm
--
In May 1972, Bush moved to Alabama to work on a political campaign and, he
has said, to perform his Guard service there for a year. But other Guard
officers have said they have no recollection of ever seeing him there.
The documents released on Friday by the Pentagon included two faded
computerized payroll sheets showing Bush was not paid during the latter part
of 1972 and offer no evidence to place Bush in Alabama during the latter
part of 1972.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/23/bush.military.records.reut/
http://crisispapers.org/essays/awol-scandal.htm
http://glcq.com/
www.awolbush.com
--
But some military experts disagreed with Bartlett's conclusion. Retired Army
Colonel Gerald A. Lechliter, who has studied Mr. Bush's records, told the
Globe, "He broke his contract with the United States government - without
any adverse consequences. And the Texas Air National Guard was complicit in
allowing this to happen."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/09/08/politics/printable642070.shtml
.
|
|
| User: "Al" |
|
| Title: Re: What about Bush's *Stolen Honor*? |
22 Oct 2004 11:24:39 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:15:45 -0600, "TheBuckDoesn'tStopHerePresident"
<NotBush@WhiteHouse.Gov> wrote:
This is an issue of much greater significance than nitpicking Kerry's
military record, which he earned in combat in Viet Nam. Using all available
*****! Kerry faked 3 purple hearts then returned to the US and got
thousands of kids murdered with his Anti-American nonsense... Gave
Comfort and Hope to the enemy and even negotiated with them..
The man is a traitor.. PERIOD!
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Al
http://netblognews.com
NBN News Blog - Political Blogging
NBN BBS Open to All - Post your Best Rants Here!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chess" |
|
| Title: Re: What about Bush's *Stolen Honor*? |
22 Oct 2004 04:56:30 PM |
|
|
"Al" <some@nothing.com> wrote in message
news:8qcin0loig2ekb058qqbmd0bk86j128anv@4ax.com...
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:15:45 -0600, "TheBuckDoesn'tStopHerePresident"
<NotBush@WhiteHouse.Gov> wrote:
This is an issue of much greater significance than nitpicking Kerry's
military record, which he earned in combat in Viet Nam. Using all
available
*****! Kerry faked 3 purple hearts then returned to the US and got
thousands of kids murdered with his Anti-American nonsense... Gave
Comfort and Hope to the enemy and even negotiated with them..
The man is a traitor.. PERIOD!
A new study by the Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) shows
that supporters of President Bush hold wildly inaccurate views about the
world. For example, "a large majority [72 percent] of Bush supporters
believe that before the war Iraq had weapons of mass destruction." Most
Bush supporters [57 percent] also believe that the recently released report
by Charles Duelfer, the administration's hand-picked weapons inspector,
concluded Iraq either had WMD or a major program for developing them. In
fact, the report concluded "Saddam Hussein did not produce or possess any
weapons of mass destruction for more than a decade before the U.S.-led
invasion" and the U.N. inspection regime had "curbed his ability to build or
develop weapons."
According to the study, 75 percent Bush supporters also believe "Iraq was
providing substantial support to al Qaeda." Most Bush supporters [55
percent] believe that was the conclusion of the 9/11 commission. In fact,
the 9/11 commission concluded there was no "collaborative relationship"
between al-Qaeda and Iraq.
This here proves Republicans will believe anything that the administration
tells them. Like Kerry faking 3 purple hearts. A bullet going through your
leg or shrapnel in your ***** I don't know how you fake that. Going back to
rescue a fellow soldier.........oh that is treason. After I came back from
Vietnam I protested the war. I saw how unjust it was and how wrong it was.
It was just the United States trying to shove it's beliefs down another
countries throat. Just like Iraq. Because we were afraid of communisum. I
think Republicans need to figure out truths instead of the lies that they
have been told by the Bush administration before they start spouting
somehitng they know nothing about. They do not just give medals and purple
hearts away for no reason. But the Bush administration makes you think that
they did in Vietnam. At least Kerry volunteered and went to Veitnam instead
of chicken ***** out and using daddy's power to keep him safe from war. Or
using 5 deferments like "*****" Cheney. At least Kerry has seen war which is
something that Bush knows nothing about. Bush is willing to send thousands
of American kids to their death for absolutely no reason. Or I guess you
think that Iraq had something to do will 9/11 or had WMD or is it all
because Saddam Hussein was a bad man? Not to mention how many innocent
Iraqi civilians have been slaughtered in this unjust ilegal war. What about
Bush's mass graves? Or doesn't that count?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: What about Bush's *Stolen Honor*? |
22 Oct 2004 01:14:34 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:24:39 GMT, Al <some@nothing.com> wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:15:45 -0600, "TheBuckDoesn'tStopHerePresident"
<NotBush@WhiteHouse.Gov> wrote:
This is an issue of much greater significance than nitpicking Kerry's
military record, which he earned in combat in Viet Nam. Using all available
*****! Kerry faked 3 purple hearts then returned to the US and got
thousands of kids murdered with his Anti-American nonsense... Gave
Comfort and Hope to the enemy and even negotiated with them..
The man is a traitor.. PERIOD!
I think I saw that twilight zone episode. You shouldn't do drugs when
you watch shows like that.
____
"Russia does not have in its possession any trustworthy data that
would support the existence of nuclear weapons on any weapons of mass
destruction in Iraq, and we have not received from our partners such
information as yet," Putin told a press conference after his recent
meetings with Tony Blair in the Russian countryside, including the
British government's recently disclosed dossier that alleges Saddam
has weapons of mass destruction that he's ready to use.
Oct 17, 2002
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/DJ17Ak03.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Cumference" |
|
| Title: Re: What about Bush's *Stolen Honor*? |
21 Oct 2004 09:27:44 PM |
|
|
TheBuckDoesn'tStopHerePresident wrote:
This is an issue of much greater significance than nitpicking Kerry's
military record, which he earned in combat in Viet Nam.
So tell us of Kerry's brave combat deeds in Vietnam which earned him
this great military record.
You mean the brave deed like doing a cut-and-run when another swift boat
hit a mine, while the other boats stayed to aid the stricken craft? You
mean like the brave deed when he claimed it was the other boats that
fled while he stayed, only to have to recant his story when caught in
the lie?
You mean the brave deeds of three purple hearts for minor scratches that
were treated with a bandaid, and then using the three purple heart rule
to scram out of Vietnam as quickly as possible?
Care to enlighten us on some other brave deeds?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vern Cole" |
|
| Title: Re: What about Bush's *Stolen Honor*? |
22 Oct 2004 10:27:39 AM |
|
|
This election isn't about George Bush and his being AWOL. It is about
John Kerry's treason. What John Kerry did was no different than what
Robert Garwood did. Garwood used a megaphone to broadcast to the
American soldiers and POW's while he was still enlisted in the United
States Marines. John Kerry used a tape recorded address to the U. S.
Senate while he was still a Commisioned Officer in the United States
Naval Reserves to broadcast to our POW's being held in Hanoi.
Vern
"TheBuckDoesn'tStopHerePresident" <NotBush@WhiteHouse.Gov> wrote in message news:<1098404074.9XGXyKsu+7J+7Z4YJS+b0Q@teranews>...
Can you help provide the military records that prove Lt. George W. Bush
completed his military commitment?
This is an issue of much greater significance than nitpicking Kerry's
military record, which he earned in combat in Viet Nam. Using all available
records, except for Bush's unsupported 'honorable discharge', one can only
conclude Bush was AWOL and/or a deserter during war time.
So do your patriotic duty for your "war president" and prove he hasn't sent
thousands of men and women to be injured or killed in Iraq while avoiding
fighting in Viet Nam himself and then apparently going AWOL.
--
The U.S. News analysis also showed that during the final two years of his
obligation, Bush did not comply with Air Force regulations that impose a
time limit on making up missed drills. What's more, he apparently never made
up five months of drills he missed in 1972, contrary to assertions by the
administration. White House officials did not respond to the analysis last
week but emphasized that Bush had "served honorably."
Some experts say they remain mystified as to how Bush obtained an honorable
discharge. Lawrence Korb, a former top Defense Department official in the
Reagan administration, says the military records clearly show that Bush "had
not fulfilled his obligation" and "should have been called to active duty."
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/040920/usnews/20guard.htm
--
In May 1972, Bush moved to Alabama to work on a political campaign and, he
has said, to perform his Guard service there for a year. But other Guard
officers have said they have no recollection of ever seeing him there.
The documents released on Friday by the Pentagon included two faded
computerized payroll sheets showing Bush was not paid during the latter part
of 1972 and offer no evidence to place Bush in Alabama during the latter
part of 1972.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/23/bush.military.records.reut/
http://crisispapers.org/essays/awol-scandal.htm
http://glcq.com/
www.awolbush.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "username here" |
|
| Title: QUOTE |
24 Oct 2004 05:31:45 PM |
|
|
"Almost no one disagrees with these basic facts: that
Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a menace; that he has
weapons of mass destruction and that he is doing everything
in his power to get nuclear weapons; that he has supported
terrorists..."
--John Edwards October 10, 2002
.
|
|
|
| User: "Family Man" |
|
| Title: Re: QUOTE |
24 Oct 2004 06:14:50 PM |
|
|
"username here" <justin@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:l3Wed.310383$3l3.198869@attbi_s03...
"Almost no one disagrees with these basic facts: that
Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a menace; that he has
weapons of mass destruction and that he is doing everything
in his power to get nuclear weapons; that he has supported
terrorists..."
--John Edwards October 10, 2002
Looks like Bush & Company fed him the wrong info too.
Time to Fire the Liar!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "My_Name_is_of_No_Concern" |
|
| Title: Re: QUOTE |
24 Oct 2004 10:03:01 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 22:31:45 GMT, "username here"
<justin@earthlink.net> wrote:
"Almost no one disagrees with these basic facts: that
Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a menace; that he has
weapons of mass destruction and that he is doing everything
in his power to get nuclear weapons; that he has supported
terrorists..."
--John Edwards October 10, 2002
So what's your point? That Edwards is smart enogh to change his mind?
Good for him.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
