They start to sound like "eVil" Liberals.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:ACLU
Check this out:
______________________________________________
"-Is simply false. I can easily give you 20 examples the ACLU defending
Christians. Furthermore, it is very difficult to claim that the ACLU was
being anti-Christian or such in the Dover trial since part of the issue
was the claim made by the defence that ID was not Christian in nature.
JoshuaZ 00:01, 22 February 2007 (EST)
______________________________________________
Joshua, your 20 cases is out of how many? 20,000? That would be
0.1%. That is very rare indeed. Let's be factual about this. The ACLU
brings at least 100 cases against prayer, the Ten Commandments,
statutes, Boy Scouts, Intelligent Design, etc., for every case brought
on the other side. Be honest about the ratios here.
In the Dover case the ACLU attacked Christian comments made by
school board members. Again, be honest about the facts. ID is backed by
Christians and typically opposed by atheists. There are rare
counterexamples of little significance.--Aschlafly 00:13, 22 February
2007 (EST)
__________________________
Andrew, first of all note that I said I can easily give you 20.
There are far more examples than that- 20 is the easy number to do.
Second of all, I would tentatively suggest that even if your claim were
accurate there is a simple explanation- the US is a country with a large
Christian majority, it is therefore not at all surprising that the vast
majority of violations of the first amendment and related issues occur
where Christians are the one's whose views are being possibly establshed
and thus invite the ACLU's ire."
Read on:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:ACLU
To the Rightards:
This is great folks... really. If there is this kind of fact-finding and
questioning, by golly, "Conservapedia" may be a great source of
information! LOL! Really!!
.
|
