| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Auric Hellman" |
| Date: |
22 Jan 2005 09:25:14 PM |
| Object: |
What if Saddam wins the election? |
Since most of the 400+ candidates are anonymous on the presidential
ballot for the Jan.31st Iraqi elections, I was wondering what George
W.'s reaction would be if Iraqi's overwhelmingly cast their ballots for
Saddam Hussein.
.
|
|
| User: "C. Pangus" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 05:53:37 AM |
|
|
"Auric Hellman" <adhellman@volcanomail.com> wrote in message
news:1106450714.352588.312240@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Since most of the 400+ candidates are anonymous on the presidential
ballot for the Jan.31st Iraqi elections, I was wondering what George
W.'s reaction would be if Iraqi's overwhelmingly cast their ballots for
Saddam Hussein.
That is one of the few possibilities that would get Bush to admit the
election was rigged :-).
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Gamelson" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 08:29:55 AM |
|
|
Since most of the 400+ candidates are anonymous on the presidential
ballot for the Jan.31st Iraqi elections, I was wondering what George
W.'s reaction would be if Iraqi's overwhelmingly cast their ballots for
Saddam Hussein.
Saddam Hussein is not eligible to be elected.
--
Allah is not the God of creation:
http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0042/0042_01.asp
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 09:28:34 AM |
|
|
Bill Gamelson wrote:
Since most of the 400+ candidates are anonymous on the presidential
ballot for the Jan.31st Iraqi elections, I was wondering what George
W.'s reaction would be if Iraqi's overwhelmingly cast their ballots
for
Saddam Hussein.
Saddam Hussein is not eligible to be elected.
--
Allah is not the God of creation:
http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0042/0042_01.asp
Fundie fantasies! Ya gotta love them. Saving cartoon character
version of people, one hellfire sermon after another! Bill Gamelson,
do you actually believe most Muslims are as they are portrayed in the
Chick tract? You know, part of some secret cabal to destroy the west,
and will simply switch sides by saying a few words, and showing them an
undocumented photo?
Heck, do you believe most Catholics are as Chick publishing portrays
them?
- Richard Hutnik
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Docky Wocky" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 11:44:34 AM |
|
|
Saddam will just have a bad day and hang himself in his cell.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Bonde" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 01:27:18 AM |
|
|
Auric Hellman wrote:
Since most of the 400+ candidates are anonymous on the presidential
ballot for the Jan.31st Iraqi elections, I was wondering what George
W.'s reaction would be if Iraqi's overwhelmingly cast their ballots for
Saddam Hussein.
Why do you think that Iraqis want Saddam? Most Iraqis seem to think he's
irrelevant.
--
Even though the world knows that these areas are susceptible to this
sort of thing, there apparently are no warning systems in place to
attempt to mitigate a disaster like this even for those areas literally
a 1000 km away, a distance that puts the inundation, I think, a couple
of hours from the original seismic event. It is simply unconscionable
that I could find out here in America about this threat before people
who are actually at grave risk could.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "ShÎllary" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
22 Jan 2005 10:05:53 PM |
|
|
In article <1106450714.352588.312240@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
"Auric Hellman" <adhellman@volcanomail.com> wrote:
Since most of the 400+ candidates are anonymous on the presidential
ballot for the Jan.31st Iraqi elections, I was wondering what George
W.'s reaction would be if Iraqi's overwhelmingly cast their ballots for
Saddam Hussein.
If the US steps in and said No, It wouldn't be Iraqi Freedom or democracy
would it?
otherwise saddam should and would be president again if thats what the
votes are.
But rest assured the only known candidates are the interim US puppets.
The Rest are being kept secret until they see the ballot on voting day!
I guarantee it ;when the votes are tallied ,it will be a US puppet in
control
Not a sovereign democracy, but a colony of the US.
The US will be there for a long time , They're building 10+ permanant
Military bases,
don't ya know.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gogarty" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 10:25:29 AM |
|
|
In article <1106450714.352588.312240@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
adhellman@volcanomail.com says...
Since most of the 400+ candidates are anonymous on the presidential
ballot for the Jan.31st Iraqi elections, I was wondering what George
W.'s reaction would be if Iraqi's overwhelmingly cast their ballots for
Saddam Hussein.
The election, as far as anyone can understand it, is not for president or
any other high office. It is to select an assembly that will then write
a constitution after which furter elections will actually produce a
government. Of course, the constitution has already been written, as
dictated by the US, so the election is quite meaningless and only serves
to ratify what the US has already done. Hussein will not be on the
ballot.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Real Diddy Pop" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 06:18:24 AM |
|
|
Let me ask you this, would it please you if he were to be elected?
Saddam that is.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chance Hopkins" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 08:45:43 AM |
|
|
"The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1106482704.767191.326100@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Let me ask you this, would it please you if he were to be elected?
Saddam that is.
You know there is nothing more annoying when someone asks a hypothetical
question in an attempt to foster a discussion, than having someone chime in
with a trite antagonistic attempt at engaging the person with a personal
wanna be introspective question that starts off "let me ask you this" and
repeating the original posters point with an accusatory flavor of "would it
please you if that hypothetical situation happened".
It like someone asking, "what if an earthquake hit California" and your dumb
***** chimes in "let me ask you this, would it please you if an earthquake hit
California?". OF COURSE NOT YOU RETARD!!! WHY CAN"T PEOPLE RAISE
HYPOTHETICAL QUESTIONS WITHOUT SOME LOSER ATTACKING THEM? Go eat your own
***** and *****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Gamelson" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 09:13:47 AM |
|
|
It like someone asking, "what if an earthquake hit California" and your
dumb ***** chimes in "let me ask you this, would it please you if an
earthquake hit California?".
Or perhaps "Would it please you if a cyclone hit Kansas?"
--
"Truth lags last, limping along on the arm of Time."
-- Baltasar Gracian
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Bonde The chamber was in confusion, all the voices shoutingloud " |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 12:59:58 PM |
|
|
Chance Hopkins wrote:
"The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1106482704.767191.326100@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Let me ask you this, would it please you if he were to be elected?
Saddam that is.
You know there is nothing more annoying when someone asks a hypothetical
question in an attempt to foster a discussion, than having someone chime in
with a trite antagonistic attempt at engaging the person with a personal
wanna be introspective question that starts off "let me ask you this" and
repeating the original posters point with an accusatory flavor of "would it
please you if that hypothetical situation happened".
It like someone asking, "what if an earthquake hit California" and your dumb
***** chimes in "let me ask you this, would it please you if an earthquake hit
California?". OF COURSE NOT YOU RETARD!!! WHY CAN"T PEOPLE RAISE
HYPOTHETICAL QUESTIONS WITHOUT SOME LOSER ATTACKING THEM? Go eat your own
***** and *****.
I think it's pretty clear that your motivation for your 'hypothetical
question' is to suggest that Iraqis were better off under Saddam.
--
Personally, I believe that 9/11 should have taught us the lesson that we
can't let these countries simmer endlessly in disillusionment without
doing something about it because people become susceptible to delusional
ideas and delusional actions. Iraq, in my view, is but the first of many
efforts, certainly not all military, to remake the very face of the
world as constitutional representative democracy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gogarty" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 03:01:13 PM |
|
|
In article <41F3F42E.7475B715@backpacker.com>, says...
Chance Hopkins wrote:
"The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1106482704.767191.326100@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Let me ask you this, would it please you if he were to be elected?
Saddam that is.
You know there is nothing more annoying when someone asks a hypothetical
question in an attempt to foster a discussion, than having someone chime in
with a trite antagonistic attempt at engaging the person with a personal
wanna be introspective question that starts off "let me ask you this" and
repeating the original posters point with an accusatory flavor of "would it
please you if that hypothetical situation happened".
It like someone asking, "what if an earthquake hit California" and your dumb
***** chimes in "let me ask you this, would it please you if an earthquake hit
California?". OF COURSE NOT YOU RETARD!!! WHY CAN"T PEOPLE RAISE
HYPOTHETICAL QUESTIONS WITHOUT SOME LOSER ATTACKING THEM? Go eat your own
***** and *****.
I think it's pretty clear that your motivation for your 'hypothetical
question' is to suggest that Iraqis were better off under Saddam.
They were. Much better off.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Bonde The chamber was in confusion, all the voices shoutingloud " |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 11:12:35 PM |
|
|
Gogarty wrote:
In article <41F3F42E.7475B715@backpacker.com>, says...
Chance Hopkins wrote:
"The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1106482704.767191.326100@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Let me ask you this, would it please you if he were to be elected?
Saddam that is.
You know there is nothing more annoying when someone asks a hypothetical
question in an attempt to foster a discussion, than having someone chime in
with a trite antagonistic attempt at engaging the person with a personal
wanna be introspective question that starts off "let me ask you this" and
repeating the original posters point with an accusatory flavor of "would it
please you if that hypothetical situation happened".
It like someone asking, "what if an earthquake hit California" and your dumb
***** chimes in "let me ask you this, would it please you if an earthquake hit
California?". OF COURSE NOT YOU RETARD!!! WHY CAN"T PEOPLE RAISE
HYPOTHETICAL QUESTIONS WITHOUT SOME LOSER ATTACKING THEM? Go eat your own
***** and *****.
I think it's pretty clear that your motivation for your 'hypothetical
question' is to suggest that Iraqis were better off under Saddam.
They were. Much better off.
They were stuck in a totalitarian quagmire that had become the endless
status quo. Millions of people died and for nothing. Now they have a
chance at freedom. That chance is a great thing.
--
"Throw me that lipstick, darling, I wanna redo my stigmata."
+-Jennifer Saunders, "Absolutely Fabulous"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gogarty" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
24 Jan 2005 08:09:03 AM |
|
|
In article <41F483C3.DC82BB9@backpacker.com>, says...
They were stuck in a totalitarian quagmire that had become the endless
status quo. Millions of people died and for nothing. Now they have a
chance at freedom. That chance is a great thing.
Well, if it makes you happy to believe that, then believe it. But is it worth
all those dead and the destruction of the US reputation in the entire world?
What millions of people are you talking about? The Iran-Iraq war? Who funded
and supplied the Iraqis in that war?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Bonde The chamber was in confusion, all the voices shoutingloud " |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
24 Jan 2005 03:34:05 PM |
|
|
Gogarty wrote:
In article <41F483C3.DC82BB9@backpacker.com>, says...
They were stuck in a totalitarian quagmire that had become the endless
status quo. Millions of people died and for nothing. Now they have a
chance at freedom. That chance is a great thing.
Well, if it makes you happy to believe that, then believe it. But is it worth
all those dead and the destruction of the US reputation in the entire world?
What are you talking about? The US does anything and you Libs claim it
is hurting our reputation. When the US does nothing, you claim that is
hurting our reputation. The fact is, the willingness to act finally has
secured our reputation as something other than the pusillanimous run
from any fight wallies we were looked on as.
What millions of people are you talking about? The Iran-Iraq war? Who funded
and supplied the Iraqis in that war?
Most of the money came from other Arab nations like Kuwait and Saudi
Arabia. Most of the arms came from the Soviet Union and France. I'm,
however, talking about Saddam post 1991.
--
"Throw me that lipstick, darling, I wanna redo my stigmata."
+-Jennifer Saunders, "Absolutely Fabulous"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim Crowley" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
24 Jan 2005 06:15:07 PM |
|
|
Bill Bonde ( ''The chamber was in confusion, all the voices shouting
loud'' ) wrote:
Gogarty wrote:
In article <41F483C3.DC82BB9@backpacker.com>,
stderr2@backpacker.com says...
They were stuck in a totalitarian quagmire that had become the
endless
status quo. Millions of people died and for nothing. Now they have
a
chance at freedom. That chance is a great thing.
Well, if it makes you happy to believe that, then believe it. But
is it worth
all those dead and the destruction of the US reputation in the
entire world?
What are you talking about? The US does anything and you Libs claim
it
is hurting our reputation. When the US does nothing, you claim that
is
hurting our reputation. The fact is, the willingness to act finally
has
secured our reputation as something other than the pusillanimous run
from any fight wallies we were looked on as.
Damn you are an ignorant cretin. You don't think that telling the world
that we are going to war cause a country is a risk to the world and
that that country has WMD and we KNOW where they are - and THEN finding
out they didn't have them - don't you understand how harmful that is to
our reputation. I know you don't care, you seem to relish your
reputation as a liar. But the Great United States of America used to be
trusted throu-out the world. You hate our nation and could care less
what happens to our reputation.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
24 Jan 2005 07:39:58 PM |
|
|
On 24 Jan 2005 16:15:07 -0800, "Tim Crowley"
<google@seattlemusicweb.com> wrote:
Damn you are an ignorant cretin. You don't think that telling the world
that we are going to war cause a country is a risk to the world and
that that country has WMD and we KNOW where they are - and THEN finding
out they didn't have them - don't you understand how harmful that is to
our reputation. I know you don't care, you seem to relish your
reputation as a liar. But the Great United States of America used to be
trusted throu-out the world. You hate our nation and could care less
what happens to our reputation.
In his world it doesn't matter as long as we can kick the ***** out of
anyone who dares to say that out loud.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Defendario" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
24 Jan 2005 09:45:31 PM |
|
|
wrote:
On 24 Jan 2005 16:15:07 -0800, "Tim Crowley"
<google@seattlemusicweb.com> wrote:
Damn you are an ignorant cretin. You don't think that telling the world
that we are going to war cause a country is a risk to the world and
that that country has WMD and we KNOW where they are - and THEN finding
out they didn't have them - don't you understand how harmful that is to
our reputation. I know you don't care, you seem to relish your
reputation as a liar. But the Great United States of America used to be
trusted throu-out the world. You hate our nation and could care less
what happens to our reputation.
In his world it doesn't matter as long as we can kick the ***** out of
anyone who dares to say that out loud.
You got that right.
Bill Bonde is a usenet Loon of the first order.
Initially amusing, but quickly becomes tedious...
;D
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "torresD" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 11:44:44 PM |
|
|
Saddam should be allowed to be a presidential candidate.
After all, Bush was allowed.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "BigVinnie" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 03:09:50 PM |
|
|
Gogarty wrote:
[snip]
I think it's pretty clear that your motivation for your 'hypothetical
question' is to suggest that Iraqis were better off under Saddam.
They were. Much better off.
Yup. All the ones that were allowed to live.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gogarty" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 03:51:27 PM |
|
|
In article <R-KdnTqA-sIDj2ncRVn-vg@centurytel.net>,
BigVinnieRocks@gwhizmail.com says...
Gogarty wrote:
[snip]
I think it's pretty clear that your motivation for your 'hypothetical
question' is to suggest that Iraqis were better off under Saddam.
They were. Much better off.
Yup. All the ones that were allowed to live.
Which was considerbly more than are allowed to live these days.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Real Diddy Pop" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 06:47:41 PM |
|
|
You make my point...and that alt.politics is infested with many Saddam
sympathizers and al Qaida sympathizers. The only thing is that all of
you don't have the balls to admit it. Cowards.
.
|
|
|
| User: "?L? ? ? ?-SU?" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
24 Jan 2005 07:08:07 AM |
|
|
Apparently I didn't make my point. You are still making assumptions about
everyone else.
I decided you're a transvestite. I must be right cause I said so.
"The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1106527661.637663.51510@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
You make my point...and that alt.politics is infested with many Saddam
sympathizers and al Qaida sympathizers. The only thing is that all of
you don't have the balls to admit it. Cowards.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Auric Hellman" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 07:22:50 PM |
|
|
The Real Diddy Pop wrote:
You make my point...and that alt.politics is infested with many
Saddam
sympathizers and al Qaida sympathizers. The only thing is that all
of
you don't have the balls to admit it. Cowards.
I am an American patriot, that is wanting what is best for this country
and not having our sons and daughters needlessly killed. Saddam Hussein
was better for America than any puppet we install. He was the sworn
enemy of Iran and al Queda both. The only WMD he ever had was the gas
Rumsfeld gave him during the Reagan administration to fight Iran. His
hatred of Israel is common throughout the world. Cowboy Bush would
better serve this country if HE stopped kissing Osama's ***** by letting
him taunt America with his endless "messages". Who's the patriot?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Bonde The chamber was in confusion, all the voices shoutingloud " |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 11:18:55 PM |
|
|
Auric Hellman wrote:
The Real Diddy Pop wrote:
You make my point...and that alt.politics is infested with many
Saddam
sympathizers and al Qaida sympathizers. The only thing is that all
of
you don't have the balls to admit it. Cowards.
I am an American patriot, that is wanting what is best for this country
and not having our sons and daughters needlessly killed. Saddam Hussein
was better for America than any puppet we install.
Huh? Saddam has been the problem in the Middle East at least as large as
that mess between Israel and the Palis that you probably think we should
focus on for another thirty or forty years to the exclusion of
everything else.
He was the sworn
enemy of Iran and al Queda both.
How often do we hear this but is it ever backed with evidence? Al Qaeda
seems to have started after the 1991 Gulf War in response to the US
stationing its defensive forces in Saudi Arabia to protect it against
Saddam. Saddam did fight a war in the 80s with Iran but has tried to get
closer to Iran repeatedly since. Iraq under Saddam more recently invaded
Kuwait, a close friend of the US and a supposed friend of Iraq until the
invasion, than it has done anything to Iran. There is no evidence that
Saddam hated al Qaeda. Saddam's former regime members and al Qaedaists
seem to have no trouble integrating in Iraq to fight us. So much for
your theory.
The only WMD he ever had was the gas
Rumsfeld gave him during the Reagan administration to fight Iran. His
This is a lie. There is no evidence that Reagan ever gave any WMD to
Iraq or to any other country.
hatred of Israel is common throughout the world. Cowboy Bush would
better serve this country if HE stopped kissing Osama's ***** by letting
him taunt America with his endless "messages".
Should Bush bomb al Jazeera? What's the plan?
Who's the patriot?
No you, you're some kind of parrot.
--
"Throw me that lipstick, darling, I wanna redo my stigmata."
+-Jennifer Saunders, "Absolutely Fabulous"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Defendario" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 09:13:57 PM |
|
|
Auric Hellman wrote:
The Real Diddy Pop wrote:
You make my point...and that alt.politics is infested with many
Saddam
sympathizers and al Qaida sympathizers. The only thing is that all
of
you don't have the balls to admit it. Cowards.
I am an American patriot, that is wanting what is best for this country
and not having our sons and daughters needlessly killed. Saddam Hussein
was better for America than any puppet we install. He was the sworn
enemy of Iran and al Queda both. The only WMD he ever had was the gas
Rumsfeld gave him during the Reagan administration to fight Iran. His
hatred of Israel is common throughout the world. Cowboy Bush would
better serve this country if HE stopped kissing Osama's ***** by letting
him taunt America with his endless "messages". Who's the patriot?
TY for saying that. I have been trying to get those same points across
for some time now. Being against needless war is true patriotism, IOW.
;D
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Real Diddy Pop" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 06:37:48 PM |
|
|
You never answered the question. Are you too chickenshit to admit that
you want Saddam Hussein to be the President of Iraq?
.
|
|
|
| User: "?L? ? ? ?-SU?" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
24 Jan 2005 07:06:53 AM |
|
|
lol, we all finished high school along time ago. Get a life.
"The Real Diddy Pop" <cjp44@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1106527068.959332.13800@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
You never answered the question. Are you too chickenshit to admit that
you want Saddam Hussein to be the President of Iraq?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gogarty" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 10:26:52 AM |
|
|
In article <1106482704.767191.326100@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
cjp44@msn.com says...
Let me ask you this, would it please you if he were to be elected?
Saddam that is.
He would run the country a hell of a lot better than anyone is running it
now. And was running it a hell of a lot better. And you know what? He
told the truth; Bush lied.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Real Diddy Pop" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
24 Jan 2005 07:55:23 PM |
|
|
Yeah, you and your like are simply trying to rewrite history. Just
another example of a person who is sympathizing with the likes of al
Zarqwai. You're exposed.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 04:07:49 AM |
|
|
The Iraqis deserve Saddam!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pete J. Ahacich" |
|
| Title: Re: What if Saddam wins the election? |
23 Jan 2005 08:53:32 PM |
|
|
The way the question should read is: How would G W.Bush respond if Saddam
was tried and acquitted, ran for office, got 100% of the vote (again) and
then President Saddam sent GW > his < regards. ;-)
"Auric Hellman" <adhellman@volcanomail.com> wrote in message
news:1106450714.352588.312240@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Since most of the 400+ candidates are anonymous on the presidential
ballot for the Jan.31st Iraqi elections, I was wondering what George
W.'s reaction would be if Iraqi's overwhelmingly cast their ballots for
Saddam Hussein.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: What if HITLER wins the election? |
22 Jan 2005 09:38:57 PM |
|
|
would you still be pulling for the terrorists in iraq to defeat america
?
" We are not men unless we destroy Syria, the pillar of terrorism, next
!"
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
