| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Hope" |
| Date: |
19 Dec 2005 11:18:31 AM |
| Object: |
What would have happened if Bush cut down the cherry tree |
So you know how Our Great Leader keeps insisting that Congress had the
"same intelligence" that he did when deciding whether or not to invade
Iraq? http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/11/iraq-intel/
He's been saying it an awful lot recently.
Well last week a report released by the nonpartisan Congressional
Research Service revealed that, in fact, "The president, and a small
number of presidentially designated Cabinet-level officials, including
the vice president ... have access to a far greater overall volume of
intelligence and to more sensitive intelligence information, including
information regarding intelligence sources and methods."
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/13416470.htm
Yes folks, the president was lying.
Go on, tell me you're shocked.
You know, it kinda makes me wonder what would have happened if it had
been George W. Bush who cut down that mythical cherry tree instead of
George Washington.
I think it might have gone something like this:
First he would have claimed that the cherry tree was harboring weapons
of mass destruction.
Then he would have insisted that the cherry tree was in league with Al
Qaeda.
Then he would have explained that he was just trying to bring freedom
to the cherry tree.
Then he would have pretended that Congress had the same intelligence
about the cherry tree when they gave him the authority to cut it down.
Finally he would have announced that if he had to do it all over
again, he still would have cut down the cherry tree.
And then he would have gotten his ***** spanked.
From The Democratic Underground
http://www.democraticunderground.com/
Harry
.
|
|
| User: "ouroboros rex" |
|
| Title: Re: What would have happened if Bush cut down the cherry tree |
19 Dec 2005 11:28:15 AM |
|
|
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:5rqdq1pg59t8q4123dtmm6b0jm1bslbs7s@4ax.com...
So you know how Our Great Leader keeps insisting that Congress had the
"same intelligence" that he did when deciding whether or not to invade
Iraq? http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/11/iraq-intel/
He's been saying it an awful lot recently.
Well last week a report released by the nonpartisan Congressional
Research Service revealed that, in fact, "The president, and a small
number of presidentially designated Cabinet-level officials, including
the vice president ... have access to a far greater overall volume of
intelligence and to more sensitive intelligence information, including
information regarding intelligence sources and methods."
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/13416470.htm
Yes folks, the president was lying.
Go on, tell me you're shocked.
You know, it kinda makes me wonder what would have happened if it had
been George W. Bush who cut down that mythical cherry tree instead of
George Washington.
I think it might have gone something like this:
First he would have claimed that the cherry tree was harboring weapons
of mass destruction.
Then he would have insisted that the cherry tree was in league with Al
Qaeda.
Then he would have explained that he was just trying to bring freedom
to the cherry tree.
Then he would have pretended that Congress had the same intelligence
about the cherry tree when they gave him the authority to cut it down.
Finally he would have announced that if he had to do it all over
again, he still would have cut down the cherry tree.
And then he would have gotten his ***** spanked.
From The Democratic Underground
http://www.democraticunderground.com/
Harry
I just don't want our first warning to be a pine scented mushroom cloud.
You know, like after uncle George comes out of the bathroom.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Miles Long" |
|
| Title: Re: What would have happened if Bush cut down the cherry tree |
19 Dec 2005 11:58:41 AM |
|
|
ouroboros rex wrote:
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:5rqdq1pg59t8q4123dtmm6b0jm1bslbs7s@4ax.com...
So you know how Our Great Leader keeps insisting that Congress had the
"same intelligence" that he did when deciding whether or not to invade
Iraq? http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/11/iraq-intel/
He's been saying it an awful lot recently.
Well last week a report released by the nonpartisan Congressional
Research Service revealed that, in fact, "The president, and a small
number of presidentially designated Cabinet-level officials, including
the vice president ... have access to a far greater overall volume of
intelligence and to more sensitive intelligence information, including
information regarding intelligence sources and methods."
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/13416470.htm
Yes folks, the president was lying.
Go on, tell me you're shocked.
You know, it kinda makes me wonder what would have happened if it had
been George W. Bush who cut down that mythical cherry tree instead of
George Washington.
I think it might have gone something like this:
First he would have claimed that the cherry tree was harboring weapons
of mass destruction.
Then he would have insisted that the cherry tree was in league with Al
Qaeda.
Then he would have explained that he was just trying to bring freedom
to the cherry tree.
Then he would have pretended that Congress had the same intelligence
about the cherry tree when they gave him the authority to cut it down.
Finally he would have announced that if he had to do it all over
again, he still would have cut down the cherry tree.
And then he would have gotten his ***** spanked.
From The Democratic Underground
http://www.democraticunderground.com/
Harry
I just don't want our first warning to be a pine scented mushroom cloud.
You know, like after uncle George comes out of the bathroom.
Now that's just silly! <laughing> After all, ONE of our first warnings
was when the Presidential Daily Briefing stated "Bin Ladin determined to
strike targets in America" with the supporting documentation that his
preferred method was to use airplanes. Unfortunately it came during our
president's month-long vacation after less than a year in office.
Miles "Non-Revisionist Historian" Long
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|