What Would Lt. Kerry Say? What will Lt. Kerry Say?



 Politics > Politics-USA > What Would Lt. Kerry Say? What will Lt. Kerry Say?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Joe Blowtowski"
Date: 05 Aug 2004 08:11:12 AM
Object: What Would Lt. Kerry Say? What will Lt. Kerry Say?
============================================
August 03, 2004, 2:09 p.m.
What Would Kerry Say?
Looking into the future.
============================================
From a speech delivered by Sen. John Kerry during an
appearance in lower Manhattan,
October 18, 2004:
My fellow Americans.
For several days, I have refrained from speaking publicly about
the events that led to last week's devastating terrorist attacks on
the Stock Exchange here in New York and at the World Bank in
Washington.
But now, I can no longer remain silent.
All of us support the president in the war on terrorism.
We are united — as we have always been united — against those
who would do us harm.
But we have now learned that last week's attacks — and the hundreds
of deaths that resulted from them — could have been prevented.
We have learned that in June and July of this year, our government
arrested senior al Qaeda terrorists in Pakistan.
U.S. agents seized computers filled with information about the attacks
that took place last week.
The information was very detailed. The terrorists had studied every
aspect of the Stock Exchange and the World Bank.
They knew how many people walked by each building at every minute
of every day.
They knew the buildings' structures. They knew their weak points.
They knew which type of explosives would do the most damage.
All of that information — and much, much more — was contained
in those computers captured in Pakistan.
And yet, did the president put the nation on alert?
Did he move heaven and earth to guard those buildings, to re-route
traffic around them, to warn people of danger?
The answer, sadly, is no.
Administration officials say they did not act because the information
was "old."
Some of it, they say, dated back before September 11.
One official even told the Washington Post, "There was nothing
that we heard that was new. Why raise the alert level?"
In the days after September 11, 2001, we all asked why our
government didn't "connect the dots" of intelligence pointing
toward those terrorist attacks.
We thought our leaders had learned some lessons.
Now, we discover that they did not.
With these new attacks, we discover that there weren't just dots
pointing toward the Stock Exchange and the World Bank.
There was a fully formed, richly detailed road map, telling our
government just where — and how — the terrorists planned to strike.
And our government did nothing.
My friends, that should never, ever happen again.
As a candidate for president, I will not comment on the bipartisan
impeachment proceedings begun by my colleagues in the House.
They have a solemn duty to perform under very difficult circumstances.
I will only say that we have an opportunity to choose real
leadership on November 2.
And now — more than ever — we know what we must do.

=========================================== end
http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york200408031409.asp
Byron York on John Kerry on Terrorism on National Review Online
.

User: "SwiftboatersSinkKerry"

Title: Re: What Would Lt. Kerry Say? What will Lt. Kerry Say? 05 Aug 2004 08:13:42 AM
"Joe Blowtowski" <Joe_Blow@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1ub4h0pde57hmqbehmfu787de89rf0bcms@4ax.com...

============================================
August 03, 2004, 2:09 p.m.

What Would Kerry Say?
Looking into the future.
============================================

From a speech delivered by Sen. John Kerry during an
appearance in lower Manhattan,
October 18, 2004:

My fellow Americans.

For several days, I have refrained from speaking publicly about
the events that led to last week's devastating terrorist attacks on
the Stock Exchange here in New York and at the World Bank in
Washington.

But now, I can no longer remain silent.

All of us support the president in the war on terrorism.
We are united - as we have always been united - against those
who would do us harm.

But we have now learned that last week's attacks - and the hundreds
of deaths that resulted from them - could have been prevented.

We have learned that in June and July of this year, our government
arrested senior al Qaeda terrorists in Pakistan.

U.S. agents seized computers filled with information about the attacks
that took place last week.

The information was very detailed. The terrorists had studied every
aspect of the Stock Exchange and the World Bank.

They knew how many people walked by each building at every minute
of every day.

They knew the buildings' structures. They knew their weak points.
They knew which type of explosives would do the most damage.

All of that information - and much, much more - was contained
in those computers captured in Pakistan.


And yet, did the president put the nation on alert?

Did he move heaven and earth to guard those buildings, to re-route
traffic around them, to warn people of danger?


The answer, sadly, is no.


Administration officials say they did not act because the information
was "old."

Some of it, they say, dated back before September 11.

One official even told the Washington Post, "There was nothing
that we heard that was new. Why raise the alert level?"


In the days after September 11, 2001, we all asked why our
government didn't "connect the dots" of intelligence pointing
toward those terrorist attacks.

We thought our leaders had learned some lessons.

Now, we discover that they did not.

With these new attacks, we discover that there weren't just dots
pointing toward the Stock Exchange and the World Bank.

There was a fully formed, richly detailed road map, telling our
government just where - and how - the terrorists planned to strike.

And our government did nothing.

My friends, that should never, ever happen again.

As a candidate for president, I will not comment on the bipartisan
impeachment proceedings begun by my colleagues in the House.
They have a solemn duty to perform under very difficult circumstances.

I will only say that we have an opportunity to choose real
leadership on November 2.

And now - more than ever - we know what we must do.

=========================================== end

http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york200408031409.asp
Byron York on John Kerry on Terrorism on National Review Online


http://www.swiftvets.com/
and
http://www.scaryjohnkerry.com/logan.htm
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: When will John Kerry say, "We were wrong on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction"?
Florida swing voters say John Kerry cleaned Bush's clock
Rightwing nut believes Kerry shot himself but refuses to say so.
Re: At least Kerry got rice in his buttocks from a grenade he tossed. Can Bush say the same?
Dems Say Kerry Back On Track
Re: Teresa Kerry Says "Un-American" before she didn't say "Un-American"
Polls say majority dislikes Kerry
Kerry 'Unfit to be Commander-in-Chief,' Say Former Military Colleagues
Vets say Kerry made up Cambodia story
John Kerry - Colossal Democrat Fraud - Say Goodnight, Johnny!
MUSLIM'S SAY KERRY MUST WIN
Re: 29% say Kerry is a uniter, 69% say a divider. One group is FUCKED in the head.
Re: Liberals Say " Get Rid Of Kerry NOW "!
Re: Embedded Reporter Say Explosive Site Empty - Kerry Should Apologize
Simple-minded Repugs say Hitler = Bush bad, Hitler = Kerry good
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER