| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" |
| Date: |
15 Sep 2005 11:16:24 AM |
| Object: |
What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
Flood victims are not allowed guns. Does that make sense to anyone???
.
|
|
| User: "cLIeNUX user" |
|
| Title: Re: What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
15 Sep 2005 01:30:58 PM |
|
|
Flood victims are not allowed guns. Does that make sense to anyone???
I was very uncomfortable with the security at the Superdome too, which
turned out to be wise beyond my wildest imagination.
As to home defense, I prefer a brush-hook anyway.
--
Rick (Richard Allen) Hohensee Party of one
candidate, President of the United States of America
Maryland, USA
Ground troops out of Iraq Put the CIA under INS
Semi-legalize drugs Prosecute Bush Tighten the borders
Isolate Israel Tax churches halve military aquisitions
platform ftp://smart.net/pub/humbubba/platform2
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "James Of Tucson" |
|
| Title: Re: What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
15 Sep 2005 02:35:42 PM |
|
|
Flood victims are not allowed guns. Does that make sense to anyone???
Yes: Might makes Right. Also, when they come to deprive you of your
rights, you're supposed to be willing to kill or die for the cause.
That whole "cold dead fingers" thing isn't just a bumper sticker. If
you aren't willing to make the ultimate sacrifice to defend the rights
for all, then you don't really have, or even deserve, those rights for
yourself.
Sorry if that's harsh, but the value of "rights" is based on them being
defended at life and death consequences.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" |
|
| Title: Re: What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
15 Sep 2005 02:30:39 PM |
|
|
GEM wrote:
"laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:jf7ji1l5bqo3fbemj4p8imq46rfl1lc9mr@4ax.com...
Flood victims are not allowed guns. Does that make sense to anyone???
Perfect sense.
They might shoot back at the people hired to kill them.
Blackwell mercs, if I remember the name right.
They might shoot the people hired to destroy the 30,000 bodies, so George
can have a body-count less than the 9/11 WTC fiasco.
That'd be a "funeral" company owned by a friend of Daddy WarBush - a funeral
company known to have desecrated and hidden bodies in the past.
They might shoot Bush or Condie or Donkey-***** during one of the phony
photo-ops used to boost public opinion.
That'd be... well.... unfortunate I guess...
When you're trying to take over a nation, its always best to insure your
victims are unarmed. Its just a lot easier and less expensive that way.
Yup - conservatives are so stupid to think the republican party cares
about their gun rights. Both parties want a dictatorship.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Cryptkeeper" |
|
| Title: Re: What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
15 Sep 2005 03:45:03 PM |
|
|
"Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" <> Yup - conservatives are so stupid to
think the republican party cares about their gun rights. Both parties want a
dictatorship.
Sadly you are right. At some point it would probably not be surprising if GW
issued some kind of mandate that due to X tragedy (like if someone took a
shot at Condie while she was at the Broadway revue of CATS or at the
Ludakris Concert) the National Guard was going to be going home-to-home
picking up all Federally registered weapons. Considering how the Republicans
have basically used the Bill of Rights as their personal wipe-cloth with
little objection from anyone, anything is possible.
Jefferson, Washington, Franklin, etc., must be turning in their graves. I
wonder if they can see what America has become?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" |
|
| Title: Re: What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
15 Sep 2005 09:52:28 PM |
|
|
The Cryptkeeper wrote:
"Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" <> Yup - conservatives are so stupid to
think the republican party cares about their gun rights. Both parties want a
dictatorship.
Sadly you are right. At some point it would probably not be surprising if GW
issued some kind of mandate that due to X tragedy (like if someone took a
shot at Condie while she was at the Broadway revue of CATS or at the
Ludakris Concert) the National Guard was going to be going home-to-home
picking up all Federally registered weapons. Considering how the Republicans
have basically used the Bill of Rights as their personal wipe-cloth with
little objection from anyone, anything is possible.
Jefferson, Washington, Franklin, etc., must be turning in their graves. I
wonder if they can see what America has become?
Those three were just as corrupt as what we have now. America never has
been what you think it is.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
16 Sep 2005 11:06:37 AM |
|
|
On 15 Sep 2005 19:52:28 -0700, "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend"
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Cryptkeeper wrote:
"Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" <> Yup - conservatives are so stupid to
think the republican party cares about their gun rights. Both parties want a
dictatorship.
Sadly you are right. At some point it would probably not be surprising if GW
issued some kind of mandate that due to X tragedy (like if someone took a
shot at Condie while she was at the Broadway revue of CATS or at the
Ludakris Concert) the National Guard was going to be going home-to-home
picking up all Federally registered weapons. Considering how the Republicans
have basically used the Bill of Rights as their personal wipe-cloth with
little objection from anyone, anything is possible.
Jefferson, Washington, Franklin, etc., must be turning in their graves. I
wonder if they can see what America has become?
Those three were just as corrupt as what we have now. America never has
been what you think it is.
I'll accept the second sentence as true - there's never been an ideal
country. However the first sentence is ludicrous - prove it! And not
in today's context but in 18th Century America. The three dead white
men were among the greats of their time. Your ignorance shows when you
equate Bush with Jefferson - only one of them possessed a brain - the
verb tense should give you a hint.
WB Yeats
.
|
|
|
| User: "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" |
|
| Title: Re: What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
17 Sep 2005 10:54:01 AM |
|
|
wrote:
On 15 Sep 2005 19:52:28 -0700, "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend"
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Those three were just as corrupt as what we have now. America never has
been what you think it is.
I'll accept the second sentence as true - there's never been an ideal
country. However the first sentence is ludicrous - prove it! And not
in today's context but in 18th Century America. The three dead white
men were among the greats of their time. Your ignorance shows when you
equate Bush with Jefferson - only one of them possessed a brain - the
verb tense should give you a hint.
Washington and Franklin were highranking masons. I'm not sure about
jefferson.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
18 Sep 2005 09:59:30 AM |
|
|
On 17 Sep 2005 08:54:01 -0700, "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend"
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
wbyeats@ireland.com wrote:
On 15 Sep 2005 19:52:28 -0700, "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend"
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Those three were just as corrupt as what we have now. America never has
been what you think it is.
I'll accept the second sentence as true - there's never been an ideal
country. However the first sentence is ludicrous - prove it! And not
in today's context but in 18th Century America. The three dead white
men were among the greats of their time. Your ignorance shows when you
equate Bush with Jefferson - only one of them possessed a brain - the
verb tense should give you a hint.
Washington and Franklin were highranking masons. I'm not sure about
jefferson.
And...........so what? My father-in-law was a Shriner and rode around
in midget cars. I can't think of any conspiracy in which he was
active. No Trilateral Commission, no Bohemian Grove, and no Skull and
Bones.
WB Yeats
.
|
|
|
| User: "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" |
|
| Title: Re: What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
18 Sep 2005 03:31:58 PM |
|
|
wrote:
On 17 Sep 2005 08:54:01 -0700, "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend"
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
wrote:
On 15 Sep 2005 19:52:28 -0700, "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend"
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Those three were just as corrupt as what we have now. America never has
been what you think it is.
I'll accept the second sentence as true - there's never been an ideal
country. However the first sentence is ludicrous - prove it! And not
in today's context but in 18th Century America. The three dead white
men were among the greats of their time. Your ignorance shows when you
equate Bush with Jefferson - only one of them possessed a brain - the
verb tense should give you a hint.
Washington and Franklin were highranking masons. I'm not sure about
jefferson.
And...........so what? My father-in-law was a Shriner and rode around
in midget cars. I can't think of any conspiracy in which he was
active. No Trilateral Commission, no Bohemian Grove, and no Skull and
Bones.
Hey stupid. A shriner is not a freemason!!!!!!!!!!! URAMORON
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
19 Sep 2005 09:34:58 AM |
|
|
On 18 Sep 2005 13:31:58 -0700, "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend"
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
wbyeats@ireland.com wrote:
On 17 Sep 2005 08:54:01 -0700, "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend"
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
wbyeats@ireland.com wrote:
On 15 Sep 2005 19:52:28 -0700, "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend"
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Those three were just as corrupt as what we have now. America never has
been what you think it is.
I'll accept the second sentence as true - there's never been an ideal
country. However the first sentence is ludicrous - prove it! And not
in today's context but in 18th Century America. The three dead white
men were among the greats of their time. Your ignorance shows when you
equate Bush with Jefferson - only one of them possessed a brain - the
verb tense should give you a hint.
Washington and Franklin were highranking masons. I'm not sure about
jefferson.
And...........so what? My father-in-law was a Shriner and rode around
in midget cars. I can't think of any conspiracy in which he was
active. No Trilateral Commission, no Bohemian Grove, and no Skull and
Bones.
Hey stupid. A shriner is not a freemason!!!!!!!!!!! URAMORON
Hey, idiot, one must be a Freemason to be a Shriner. At least try to
get your facts straight.
http://www.ben-ali-shriners.org/Want2be.htm
WB Yeats
.
|
|
|
| User: "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" |
|
| Title: Re: What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
19 Sep 2005 10:52:03 PM |
|
|
wrote:
On 18 Sep 2005 13:31:58 -0700, "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend"
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hey, idiot, one must be a Freemason to be a Shriner. At least try to
get your facts straight.
http://www.ben-ali-shriners.org/Want2be.htm
WB Yeats
I got my facts str8. Now you get your lies str8.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
20 Sep 2005 10:01:06 AM |
|
|
On 19 Sep 2005 20:52:03 -0700, "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend"
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
wbyeats@ireland.com wrote:
On 18 Sep 2005 13:31:58 -0700, "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend"
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hey, idiot, one must be a Freemason to be a Shriner. At least try to
get your facts straight.
http://www.ben-ali-shriners.org/Want2be.htm
WB Yeats
I got my facts str8. Now you get your lies str8.
Excuse me but you didn't. But you are a prime example that the
lemmings on the left are just as ignorant as the rudeboys on the
right.
WB Yeats
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
16 Sep 2005 08:41:35 PM |
|
|
wrote:
On 15 Sep 2005 19:52:28 -0700, "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend"
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Cryptkeeper wrote:
"Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" <> Yup - conservatives are so stupid to
think the republican party cares about their gun rights. Both parties want a
dictatorship.
Sadly you are right. At some point it would probably not be surprising if GW
issued some kind of mandate that due to X tragedy (like if someone took a
shot at Condie while she was at the Broadway revue of CATS or at the
Ludakris Concert) the National Guard was going to be going home-to-home
picking up all Federally registered weapons. Considering how the Republicans
have basically used the Bill of Rights as their personal wipe-cloth with
little objection from anyone, anything is possible.
Jefferson, Washington, Franklin, etc., must be turning in their graves. I
wonder if they can see what America has become?
Those three were just as corrupt as what we have now. America never has
been what you think it is.
I'll accept the second sentence as true - there's never been an ideal
country. However the first sentence is ludicrous - prove it! And not
in today's context but in 18th Century America. The three dead white
men were among the greats of their time. Your ignorance shows when you
equate Bush with Jefferson - only one of them possessed a brain - the
verb tense should give you a hint.
WB Yeats
Ain't it cute; dimocrap against dimocrap. You guys make sure you keep
up the good work!
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
17 Sep 2005 09:47:34 AM |
|
|
On 16 Sep 2005 18:41:35 -0700,
TedKennedyMurderedHisPregnantMistress.dwpj65@spamgourmet.com wrote:
wbyeats@ireland.com wrote:
On 15 Sep 2005 19:52:28 -0700, "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend"
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Cryptkeeper wrote:
"Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" <> Yup - conservatives are so stupid to
think the republican party cares about their gun rights. Both parties want a
dictatorship.
Sadly you are right. At some point it would probably not be surprising if GW
issued some kind of mandate that due to X tragedy (like if someone took a
shot at Condie while she was at the Broadway revue of CATS or at the
Ludakris Concert) the National Guard was going to be going home-to-home
picking up all Federally registered weapons. Considering how the Republicans
have basically used the Bill of Rights as their personal wipe-cloth with
little objection from anyone, anything is possible.
Jefferson, Washington, Franklin, etc., must be turning in their graves. I
wonder if they can see what America has become?
Those three were just as corrupt as what we have now. America never has
been what you think it is.
I'll accept the second sentence as true - there's never been an ideal
country. However the first sentence is ludicrous - prove it! And not
in today's context but in 18th Century America. The three dead white
men were among the greats of their time. Your ignorance shows when you
equate Bush with Jefferson - only one of them possessed a brain - the
verb tense should give you a hint.
WB Yeats
Ain't it cute; dimocrap against dimocrap. You guys make sure you keep
up the good work!
And jerks agreeing with jerks. The Repubs for the most part march in
lockstep behind their Fuhrer. OTH some of us think for ourselves and
do not have doctrinaire positions on every issue. You might try it.
This takes a brain which is usually located above your shoulders - or
in some cases where you sit.
WB Yeats
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" |
|
| Title: Re: What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
15 Sep 2005 09:52:30 PM |
|
|
The Cryptkeeper wrote:
"Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" <> Yup - conservatives are so stupid to
think the republican party cares about their gun rights. Both parties want a
dictatorship.
Sadly you are right. At some point it would probably not be surprising if GW
issued some kind of mandate that due to X tragedy (like if someone took a
shot at Condie while she was at the Broadway revue of CATS or at the
Ludakris Concert) the National Guard was going to be going home-to-home
picking up all Federally registered weapons. Considering how the Republicans
have basically used the Bill of Rights as their personal wipe-cloth with
little objection from anyone, anything is possible.
Jefferson, Washington, Franklin, etc., must be turning in their graves. I
wonder if they can see what America has become?
Those three were just as corrupt as what we have now. America never has
been what you think it is.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
16 Sep 2005 04:47:23 PM |
|
|
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote:
The Cryptkeeper wrote:
"Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" <> Yup - conservatives are so stupid to
think the republican party cares about their gun rights. Both parties want a
dictatorship.
Sadly you are right. At some point it would probably not be surprising if GW
issued some kind of mandate that due to X tragedy (like if someone took a
shot at Condie while she was at the Broadway revue of CATS or at the
Ludakris Concert) the National Guard was going to be going home-to-home
picking up all Federally registered weapons. Considering how the Republicans
have basically used the Bill of Rights as their personal wipe-cloth with
little objection from anyone, anything is possible.
Jefferson, Washington, Franklin, etc., must be turning in their graves. I
wonder if they can see what America has become?
Those three were just as corrupt as what we have now. America never has
been what you think it is.
Correction: America has never been the communist state I wished it was.
You can thank me for the correction later, *****.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Roneal" |
|
| Title: Re: What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
15 Sep 2005 11:40:20 AM |
|
|
Makes sense if you are the law enforcement officer, national guardsman, etc.
who is being fired upon by some renegades.
RO
"laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:jf7ji1l5bqo3fbemj4p8imq46rfl1lc9mr@4ax.com...
Flood victims are not allowed guns. Does that make sense to anyone???
.
|
|
|
| User: "George Harrison" |
|
| Title: Re: What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
15 Sep 2005 12:19:26 PM |
|
|
Do you want people to disarmed before any major incident?
Roneal wrote:
Makes sense if you are the law enforcement officer, national guardsman, etc.
who is being fired upon by some renegades.
RO
"laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:jf7ji1l5bqo3fbemj4p8imq46rfl1lc9mr@4ax.com...
Flood victims are not allowed guns. Does that make sense to anyone???
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David Hartung" |
|
| Title: Re: What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
15 Sep 2005 03:09:39 PM |
|
|
laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE wrote:
Flood victims are not allowed guns. Does that make sense to anyone???
Ia a left winger taking a stand in favor of the right to keep and bear arms?
Interesting.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chance Hopkins" |
|
| Title: Re: What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
15 Sep 2005 10:14:25 PM |
|
|
"David Hartung" <dhart1ng@quixnet.net> wrote in message
news:7ykWe.38201$vJ4.26842@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE wrote:
Flood victims are not allowed guns. Does that make sense to anyone???
Ia a left winger taking a stand in favor of the right to keep and bear
arms? Interesting.
Not really, count me in too (another "left winger for guns").
You might see through the propaganda soon.
.
|
|
|
| User: "rightwinghank" |
|
| Title: Re: What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
20 Sep 2005 10:31:26 AM |
|
|
The second amendment applies to humans.....that is, whites......not
blacks...monkeys... apes......dogs or cats.
love
hank
........................................
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: What's the rationale for the gun confiscation in New Orleans? |
15 Sep 2005 05:49:12 PM |
|
|
David Hartung wrote:
laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE wrote:
Flood victims are not allowed guns. Does that make sense to anyone???
Ia a left winger taking a stand in favor of the right to keep and bear arms?
Interesting.
Hardly a left winger. The nutcase above routinely posts racist and
anti-semitic rants; sounds like your basic conservative to me, albeit
one who, to his credit, doesn't like Bush. Like they say, even a
broken clock is right twice a day.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
