| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Godzilla Pimp" |
| Date: |
10 Apr 2005 07:37:13 PM |
| Object: |
What's wrong with Mexico? |
I can't think of a better place to have a country. Beats the hell out of
most of the USA. Great climate, beautiful beaches, plenty of oil and gas. Oh
yeah, it's full of Mexicans!
GP
.
|
|
| User: "Travis Campbell" |
|
| Title: Re: What's wrong with Mexico? |
10 Apr 2005 09:38:36 PM |
|
|
"Godzilla Pimp" <me7@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:ZEj6e.6906$44.1215@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
I can't think of a better place to have a country. Beats the hell out of
most of the USA. Great climate, beautiful beaches, plenty of oil and gas.
Oh
yeah, it's full of Mexicans!
GP
The biggest problem with Mexico is corruption.
From the top level politicians to the cop on the street, corruption has
always been rampant.
I paid a cop $10 for running a stop sign in the State of Juarez (south of El
Paso, Texas) back in the 70's.
Either that or $80 at the Police Station and if you couldn't pay, you'd sit
in a Mexican dungeon for 10 days.
The bribe is called, "Mordida" or "the bite".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Don Gabacho" |
|
| Title: Re: What's wrong with Mexico? |
11 Apr 2005 11:25:44 AM |
|
|
"The biggest problem with Mexico is corruption..."
It is not merely "corruption." The U.S. is also corrupt though still
regarded as an aberation and, thus, not (yet) as all-pervasive on the
everyday even hourlay life of its populace as Latin America's.
Mexico has such high regard for corruption, by contrast, to not only
have institutionalized and also refined it but also celebrate it as the
only reality.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: What's wrong with Mexico? |
11 Apr 2005 06:33:25 PM |
|
|
On 11 Apr 2005 09:25:44 -0700, "Don Gabacho" <jpastore@nettaxi.com>
wrote:
"The biggest problem with Mexico is corruption..."
It is not merely "corruption." The U.S. is also corrupt though still
regarded as an aberation and, thus, not (yet) as all-pervasive on the
everyday even hourlay life of its populace as Latin America's.
Mexico has such high regard for corruption, by contrast, to not only
have institutionalized and also refined it but also celebrate it as the
only reality.
The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
people in India.
All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke. Here is an example:
"One of the most powerful direct studies of race and environment
was conducted by psychologists Sandra Scarr, Richard Weinberg and I.
D. Waldman. All three were quite well-known for their environmental
opinions. The study analyzed White, Black, and Mixed-race adopted
children in more than 100 White families in Minnesota. The study was
an egalitarian's dream, because the children's adoptive parents had
prestigious levels of income and education and were anti-racist enough
to adopt a Black child into their own family. Scarr is a strong
defender of racial equality and maintained that environment played an
almost exclusive role in IQ differences between the races. Scarr
supports the importance of heredity in causing individual differences
within a race, but she has argued that between-race differences are
mostly environmental.
The children in the study included Whites, Blacks, and Mulattos as
well as the biological children of the White adoptive couples. At the
age of 7, the children were tested for IQ, and all of the groups
including the Blacks and Mulattos, scored above average in IQ. Scarr
and Weinberg published a paper claiming to have proven the almost
exclusive power of environment over race in IQ, even though they had
to admit that the White children, whether adopted or not, scored well
above the Black and Mulatto children and that the Mulatto children
scored above the Blacks. (88)
A decade later, when the children reached the age of 17, a
follow-up study was conducted that that again included IQ
measurements. As they matured, Black children had dropped back to an
average of 89 in IQ, which is the average IQ for Blacks in the region
of the United States where the study was done. The White adopted
children scored an average of 106 in IQ, 17 points higher than the
Black children, which is consistant with traditional studies of Black
and White IQ differences. In line with genetic theory the half-White,
half-Black Mulatto adopted children scored almost exactly between the
adopted Whites and Blacks. (89)
RESULTS OF MINNESOTA TRANSRACIAL ADOPTION STUDY
IQ
Parental IQ 115.35
Biological Children 109.4
White Adopted children 105.6
Mulatto parents adopted children 98.5
Black parents adopted children 89.4
Scarr and Wienberg reluctantly published their data from the
follow up survey, but they waited close to four years to do so, almost
as if they were embarrassed by what they had found. Through a tortured
reasoning process, they still argued that environment played a
dominant role in IQ. But in their follow-up survey, unlike their first
paper, they also admitted that genes had an important impact as well.
Both Richard Lynn and Michael Levin effectively showed in their
re-analysis of Scarr's own data, that genes clearly comprise the
dominant role in intelligence levels of those adopted children. (90)
(91)"
(88) Scarr, S, & Weinberg R. A. (1976). IQ Test Perfomance of Black
Children Adopted By White Families. American Psychologist. Vol. 31.
p.26-739
(89) Weinberg, R. A. , Scarr, S., & Waldman, I. D. (1992). The
Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study. A Follow-Up of IQ Test
Performance at Adolescence, Intelligence. Vol 16.
p.17-135
(90) Lynn, R. (1994). Reinterpretations Of The Minnesota Transracial
Adoption Study. Intelligence. Vol. 19. p.1-27
(91) Levin, M. (1994). Comment on The Minnesota Transracial Adoption
Study. Intelligence Vol. 19. p.3-20
www.spearhead-uk.com http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Cunningham" |
|
| Title: Re: What's wrong with Mexico? |
11 Apr 2005 08:57:54 AM |
|
|
"Travis Campbell" <travisc@compton.net> wrote in message
news:Npl6e.181$OU6.79@fe02.lga...
"Godzilla Pimp" <me7@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:ZEj6e.6906$44.1215@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
I can't think of a better place to have a country. Beats the hell out of
most of the USA. Great climate, beautiful beaches, plenty of oil and gas.
Oh
yeah, it's full of Mexicans!
GP
The biggest problem with Mexico is corruption.
From the top level politicians to the cop on the street, corruption has
always been rampant.
I paid a cop $10 for running a stop sign in the State of Juarez (south of
El
Paso, Texas) back in the 70's.
Either that or $80 at the Police Station and if you couldn't pay, you'd
sit
in a Mexican dungeon for 10 days.
The bribe is called, "Mordida" or "the bite".
Wait a minute. I have some friends in Chicago and its the same deal there.
You have a bill behind your drivers license in a plastic holder. Jeez, the
only thing about Mexico is its cheaper.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lets Roll" |
|
| Title: Re: What's wrong with Mexico? |
11 Apr 2005 09:31:21 AM |
|
|
"Godzilla Pimp" <me7@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:ZEj6e.6906$44.1215@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
I can't think of a better place to have a country. Beats the hell out of
most of the USA. Great climate, beautiful beaches, plenty of oil and gas.
Oh yeah, it's full of Mexicans!
GP
There ain't nothing wrong with Mexico that some good old-fashioned carpet
bombing wouldn't cure.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Branson Hunter" |
|
| Title: Re: What's wrong with Mexico? |
11 Apr 2005 10:33:39 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 09:31:21 -0500, "Lets Roll"
<letsroll@meet-me-in-hell.com> wrote:
There ain't nothing wrong with Mexico that some good old-fashioned carpet
bombing wouldn't cure.
You get the cake for making the most stupid post of the decade.
Branson Hunter
Lets Roll is a fucking lunatic
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Branson Hunter" |
|
| Title: PBS special on Karl Rove |
11 Apr 2005 10:33:40 AM |
|
|
Watch PBS's special Tuesday (9:00 PST) on Karl Rove.
This will remove all doubt he's not a neo-fascist.
Branson Hunter
.
|
|
|
| User: "Godzilla Pimp" |
|
| Title: Re: PBS special on Karl Rove |
13 Apr 2005 07:41:15 AM |
|
|
"Branson Hunter" <bh@xspam.com> wrote in message
news:dr5l51hus79nug0asqhfhpv7fqso8a58dd@4ax.com...
Watch PBS's special Tuesday (9:00 PST) on Karl Rove.
This will remove all doubt he's not a neo-fascist.
Branson Hunter
Speaking as a good old-fashioned Nazi myself, I hate his guts. He panders to
the Judeo-Christians and wants to do nothing about the flood of 3rd worlders
into the US.
He's portrayed as a political genius but has failed to realize the paramount
importance of 3rd world immigration to the average white voter. If Hillary
would stand up and proclaim that she would seal the borders, I would vote
for her and so would most white Americans.
GP
.
|
|
|
| User: "arminius richard" |
|
| Title: Re: PBS special on Karl Rove |
13 Apr 2005 08:04:30 AM |
|
|
"Godzilla Pimp" <me7@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:Lr87e.6279$sp3.5933@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"Branson Hunter" <bh@xspam.com> wrote in message
news:dr5l51hus79nug0asqhfhpv7fqso8a58dd@4ax.com...
Watch PBS's special Tuesday (9:00 PST) on Karl Rove.
This will remove all doubt he's not a neo-fascist.
Branson Hunter
Speaking as a good old-fashioned Nazi myself, I hate his guts. He panders
to
the Judeo-Christians and wants to do nothing about the flood of 3rd
worlders
into the US.
He's portrayed as a political genius but has failed to realize the
paramount
importance of 3rd world immigration to the average white voter. If Hillary
would stand up and proclaim that she would seal the borders, I would vote
for her and so would most white Americans.
GP
Karl Rove and the Press Secty. Scott McCellan are a pair of sneaky faggots
who have been recently "outed". Their sexual preferences are their choice
but don't sneak around like old J. Edgar Hoover. However, they are a pair of
diversity mongers.
Hank
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "arminius richard" |
|
| Title: Re: PBS special on Karl Rove |
13 Apr 2005 08:25:23 AM |
|
|
"Godzilla Pimp" <me7@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:Lr87e.6279$sp3.5933@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"Branson Hunter" <bh@xspam.com> wrote in message
news:dr5l51hus79nug0asqhfhpv7fqso8a58dd@4ax.com...
Watch PBS's special Tuesday (9:00 PST) on Karl Rove.
This will remove all doubt he's not a neo-fascist.
Branson Hunter
Speaking as a good old-fashioned Nazi myself, I hate his guts. He panders
to
the Judeo-Christians and wants to do nothing about the flood of 3rd
worlders
into the US.
He's portrayed as a political genius but has failed to realize the
paramount
importance of 3rd world immigration to the average white voter. If Hillary
would stand up and proclaim that she would seal the borders, I would vote
for her and so would most white Americans.
GP
Rove is a disgusting sneaky ***** and diversity booster. Same for Bush's
other ***** Press Sectry. Scott McCellan. If you are gay dont
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Branson Hunter" |
|
| Title: Re: PBS special on Karl Rove |
13 Apr 2005 10:30:19 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:41:15 GMT, "Godzilla Pimp" <me7@privacy.net>
wrote:
"Branson Hunter" <bh@xspam.com> wrote in message
Watch PBS's special Tuesday (9:00 PST) on Karl Rove.
This will remove all doubt he's not a neo-fascist.
Speaking as a good old-fashioned Nazi myself, I hate his guts. He panders to
the Judeo-Christians and wants to do nothing about the flood of 3rd worlders
into the US.
He's portrayed as a political genius but has failed to realize the paramount
importance of 3rd world immigration to the average white voter. If Hillary
would stand up and proclaim that she would seal the borders, I would vote
for her and so would most white Americans.
Send her an email. Can you see Hillary and Condi Rice running against
each other in the next presidential race?
Branson Hunter
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "William Flax" |
|
| Title: Re: PBS special on Karl Rove |
13 Apr 2005 10:46:56 AM |
|
|
What a puff piece for Rove!! The man has a powerful memory but no
meaningful analytic abilities. The special made it look as though he does.
Being snowed by the likes of Rove, says very little good about the
producers. For more on Karl, see
http://pages.prodigy.net/krtq73aa/rove2.htm
William Flax
"Godzilla Pimp" <me7@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:Lr87e.6279$sp3.5933@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"Branson Hunter" <bh@xspam.com> wrote in message
news:dr5l51hus79nug0asqhfhpv7fqso8a58dd@4ax.com...
Watch PBS's special Tuesday (9:00 PST) on Karl Rove.
This will remove all doubt he's not a neo-fascist.
Branson Hunter
Speaking as a good old-fashioned Nazi myself, I hate his guts. He panders
to
the Judeo-Christians and wants to do nothing about the flood of 3rd
worlders
into the US.
He's portrayed as a political genius but has failed to realize the
paramount
importance of 3rd world immigration to the average white voter. If Hillary
would stand up and proclaim that she would seal the borders, I would vote
for her and so would most white Americans.
GP
.
|
|
|
| User: "Branson Hunter" |
|
| Title: Re: PBS special on Karl Rove |
13 Apr 2005 10:30:21 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 15:46:56 GMT, "William Flax"
<krtq73aa@prodigy.net> wrote:
What a puff piece for Rove!! The man has a powerful memory but no
meaningful analytic abilities. The special made it look as though he does.
Being snowed by the likes of Rove, says very little good about the
producers. For more on Karl, see
http://pages.prodigy.net/krtq73aa/rove2.htm
From that article, this is interesting:
"The President's political advisor appears to be relying more
on spin, slogans and yesterday's polls, rather than any real
understanding of the complexity and context of the issues
involved.?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Egbert Sousè" |
|
| Title: Re: PBS special on Karl Rove |
11 Apr 2005 03:20:30 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:33:40 -0700, Branson Hunter <bh@xspam.com>
wrote:
Watch PBS's special Tuesday (9:00 PST) on Karl Rove.
This will remove all doubt he's not a neo-fascist.
Branson Hunter
I'm waiting for the special on his counter part, Bob Schrum.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Branson Hunter" |
|
| Title: Re: PBS special on Karl Rove |
11 Apr 2005 05:41:26 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:20:30 GMT, Egbert Sousè <egbertsousè@WCF.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:33:40 -0700, Branson Hunter <bh@xspam.com>
wrote:
Watch PBS's special Tuesday (9:00 PST) on Karl Rove.
This will remove all doubt he's not a neo-fascist.
Branson Hunter
I'm waiting for the special on his counter part, Bob Schrum.
And Richard Perle (dubbed the "Prince of Darkness").
http://rightweb.irc-online.org/ind/perle/perle.php
Branson Hunter
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Laff@Pajamaloon" |
|
| Title: Re: PBS special on Karl Rove |
11 Apr 2005 10:55:27 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:33:40 -0700, Branson Hunter <bh@xspam.com>
wrote:
Watch PBS's special Tuesday (9:00 PST) on Karl Rove.
This will remove all doubt he's not a neo-fascist.
I know he isn't
He's a fucking neo-nazi.
PBS should run a special on Hitler.
Compare the two.
=====================================================================
Hitler explains Neut Gingrich's GOPAC lecture--
"The art of propaganda lies in understanding the emotional ideas of the
great masses and finding, through a psychologically correct form, the
way to the attention and thence to the heart of the broad masses. The
fact that our bright boys do not understand this merely shows how mentally
lazy and conceited they are.
Once we understand how necessary it is for propaganda to be adjusted to
the broad mass, the following rule results:
It is a mistake to make propaganda many-sided, like scientific instruction,
for instance. The receptivity of the great masses is very limited,
their intelligence is small, but their power of forgetting is enormous.
In consequence of these facts, all effective propaganda must be limited
to a very few points and must harp on these in sloans until the
last member of the public understands what you want him to understand
by your slogan.
As soon as you sacrifice this slogan and try to be many-sided,
the effect will piddle away, for the crowd can neither digest nor retain
the material offered. In this way the result is weakened and in the
end entirely cancelled out."
Adolph Hitler, Mein Kamph
.
|
|
|
| User: "Travis Campbell" |
|
| Title: Re: PBS special on Karl Rove |
11 Apr 2005 12:58:28 PM |
|
|
<Laff@Pajamaloon> wrote in message
news:0e7l519kd1mu2jpak3fj7d5i0soblu8l5v@4ax.com...
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:33:40 -0700, Branson Hunter <bh@xspam.com>
wrote:
Watch PBS's special Tuesday (9:00 PST) on Karl Rove.
This will remove all doubt he's not a neo-fascist.
I know he isn't
He's a fucking neo-nazi.
PBS should run a special on Hitler.
Compare the two.
=====================================================================
Hitler explains Neut Gingrich's GOPAC lecture--
"The art of propaganda lies in understanding the emotional ideas of the
great masses and finding, through a psychologically correct form, the
way to the attention and thence to the heart of the broad masses. The
fact that our bright boys do not understand this merely shows how
mentally
lazy and conceited they are.
Once we understand how necessary it is for propaganda to be adjusted to
the broad mass, the following rule results:
It is a mistake to make propaganda many-sided, like scientific
instruction,
for instance. The receptivity of the great masses is very limited,
their intelligence is small, but their power of forgetting is enormous.
In consequence of these facts, all effective propaganda must be limited
to a very few points and must harp on these in sloans until the
last member of the public understands what you want him to understand
by your slogan.
As soon as you sacrifice this slogan and try to be many-sided,
the effect will piddle away, for the crowd can neither digest nor retain
the material offered. In this way the result is weakened and in the
end entirely cancelled out."
Adolph Hitler, Mein Kamph
Rove = Stalin.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Branson Hunter" |
|
| Title: Re: PBS special on Karl Rove |
11 Apr 2005 05:41:20 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 09:55:27 -0600, Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Branson Hunter <bh@xspam.com> wrote:
Watch PBS's special Tuesday (9:00 PST) on Karl Rove.
This will remove all doubt he's not a neo-fascist.
I know he isn't
He's a fucking neo-nazi.
PBS should run a special on Hitler.
Compare the two.
[Removed remaining post]
I think Norman Mailer may have made the best argument in his most
recent treatise about the necons taking the U.S. down a very dark
path. And he leaves little doubt about Rove's leanings.
Branson Hunter
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "aether" |
|
| Title: Re: What's wrong with Mexico? |
10 Apr 2005 08:53:29 PM |
|
|
Nothing chemical warfare can't rectify.
Recall the military to North America, discharge non-Whites, and
'protect' the border.
It'd be such a wonderful sight, them rioting in the cities and being
gunned down by M2 Machine Guns.
.
|
|
|
| User: "brit am" |
|
| Title: Re: What's wrong with Mexico? |
10 Apr 2005 09:08:28 PM |
|
|
"aether" <vercingetorix@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1113184409.830728.211170@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Nothing chemical warfare can't rectify.
Recall the military to North America, discharge non-Whites, and
'protect' the border.
It'd be such a wonderful sight, them rioting in the cities and being
gunned down by M2 Machine Guns.
A part of the military's job should be to protect the borders (as with the
military in most other countries). By reading Rumsfeld's interview, he
doesn't see it that way. Of course he must toe Bush's line. Bush is on a
frantic course to repay generous contributions from the likes of Tyson
Foods, Walmart and others by giving them all the illegal aliens they can
hire.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Don Gabacho" |
|
| Title: Re: What's wrong with Mexico? |
11 Apr 2005 11:18:16 AM |
|
|
"A part of the military's job should be to protect the borders..."
Not the U.S. Army in the U.S.A.. It is not their "job" and shouldn't be
their job.
There is the National Guard. Bush, however, sent them, against their
mission, overseas even though having been warned that they would be
needed on the Mexican border.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Don Gabacho" |
|
| Title: Re: What's wrong with Mexico? |
11 Apr 2005 11:18:22 AM |
|
|
"A part of the military's job should be to protect the borders..."
Not the U.S. Army in the U.S.A.. It is not their "job" and shouldn't be
their job.
There is the National Guard. Bush, however, sent them, against their
mission, overseas even though having been warned that they would be
needed on the Mexican border.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "aether" |
|
| Title: Re: What's wrong with Mexico? |
10 Apr 2005 09:37:02 PM |
|
|
brit am wrote:
A part of the military's job should be to protect the borders (as
with the
military in most other countries). By reading Rumsfeld's interview,
he
doesn't see it that way. Of course he must toe Bush's line. Bush is
on a
frantic course to repay generous contributions from the likes of
Tyson
Foods, Walmart and others by giving them all the illegal aliens they
can
hire.
The 'upper crust' have given up on the United States. Bush, Rumsfeld,
etc.. these men are, for all intents and purposes, traitors.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Honest Aryan" |
|
| Title: Re: What's wrong with Mexico? |
11 Apr 2005 11:55:31 AM |
|
|
brit am wrote:
A part of the military's job should be to protect the borders
But the US military *IS* protecting the borders,
*ISRAEL'S* borders.
http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/KIKES/jews_image08.jpg
--
Visit the Cybermuseum of BBC War Crimes at:
http://users.bluecarrots.com/rbisto/BBC/BBC.html
Admission *FREE* - even for libruls!
.
|
|
|
| User: "H. Reader" |
|
| Title: Re: What's wrong with Mexico? |
11 Apr 2005 03:51:01 PM |
|
|
"Honest Aryan" <ha@centralpets.com> wrote in message news:1113238531.365391.119400@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
brit am wrote:
A part of the military's job should be to protect the borders
But the US military *IS* protecting the borders,
*ISRAEL'S* borders.
And Korea's borders.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lets Roll" |
|
| Title: Re: What's wrong with Mexico? |
14 Apr 2005 11:12:09 AM |
|
|
"H. Reader" <historyreader@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:VqB6e.13855$ox3.5751@trnddc03...
"Honest Aryan" <ha@centralpets.com> wrote in message
news:1113238531.365391.119400@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
brit am wrote:
A part of the military's job should be to protect the borders
But the US military *IS* protecting the borders,
*ISRAEL'S* borders.
And Korea's borders.
And Iraq's.
And Afghanistan's.
And every stinking border in the world except our own.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Honest Aryan" |
|
| Title: Re: What's wrong with Mexico? |
24 Apr 2005 04:24:51 AM |
|
|
"H. Reader" <historyreader@verizon.net> wrote:
And Korea's borders.
ZOG's even got gooks "defending"/extending
Israel's borders. How many kikes you think
"America's greatest ally" <spew> sent to Iraq?
http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/KIKES/jews_image08.jpg
--
Visit the Cybermuseum of BBC War Crimes at:
http://users.bluecarrots.com/rbisto/BBC/BBC.html
Admission *FREE* - even for libruls!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Re: Mexico ceded California to the United States in 1848, and Los Angeles, the capital of Alta California, a Mexican Province, came with it
Hospital Officials, Family Struggle With Boy's Fate: Child ProtectiveServices would be taking custody if they didn't take him home to Mexico.
BUSH PLANNING USA, MEXICO, & CANADA MERGER (AS AMERICANS ARE DISTRACTED WITH CELEBRITY GOSSIP AND SPORTS)
Re: "Immigrant reunited with son in Mexico, sending him back to U.S."
Re: Mexico Teaming Up With China vs the United States - WHAT'S THE PAYOFF? (fwd)
Re: Hypocrite "Illegal immigrant reunited with son in Mexico, sending him back to U.S."
Must-see trenchant artwork re Bush's insane scheme to merge USA with Mexico
Republicans awakening!; Another GOP lawmaker ID's Bush's Sick 'Merge-With-Mexico' Scheme
| Mexico Teams With China vs USA - WHAT'S THE PAYOFF?
Re: Mexico ceded California to the United States in 1848, and Los Angeles, the capital of Alta California, a Mexican Province, came with it
Bush's North American Union/merge-with-Mexico scheme would supplant U.S. sovereignty
Gulf of Mexico saturated with oil?
Mexico Seeks Closer Ties With Russia
Venezuela's Chavez tells Mexico's Fox: 'Don't mess with me'
With Beheadings and Attacks, Drug Gangs Terrorize Mexico
|
|
|
