Evidently you have a reading comprehension problem.

The poster
didn't say he was opposed to abortion, only that the citizens of each
state would be able to make their laws themselves, democratically,
rather than by judicial fiat. What a novel idea!- A. McIntire

Joe S. wrote:

"explorerthedog" <exp1943@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1120976856.212966.11040@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

When Roe v. Wade Is Overturned, What Will Happen Then?

Each State Will Write Its Own Abortion Laws; Some Will Allow Abortion,
Some Will Not. Restrictions Will Vary.


HTML page at
http://essaysandcommentaries.com/whenroevwadeisoverturned.html

Commentary and Opinion by Rev. Bill McGinnis

This is what's going to happen regarding abortion law in the United
States. Get ready, because these things are going to happen. And in a
few years, after all the dust has settled, you can remember that you
read it here first.

1. ROE v. WADE WILL BE OVERTURNED.

The legal reasoning behind Woe v. Wade and its predecessor,Griswold v.
Connecticut is weak and flimsy, unworthy of the United States Supreme
Court. As I have shown elsewhere, if abortion is a legal right, as Roe
v. Wade asserts, then prostitution, drug use, and possession of child
pornography must also be legal rights, following the logic of Roe v.
Wade.

Carried to its logical conclusion, Roe v. Wade would prevent the
Federal and state governments from regulating most kinds of personal
behavior, because in each case, the newly-discovered privacy and
liberty rights would outweigh the long-established inherent rights of
Government to define and punish criminal behavior, which Roe v. Wade
basically ignores.

Perhaps the extreme Libertarians would think that this is a good idea -
unrestricted personal behavior. If so, it will be interesting to see
how they join together with the pro-abortion leftists to defend Roe v.
Wade.

Please see Roe v. Wade at http://laws.findlaw.com/us/410/113.html ;
Griswold v. Connecticut at http://laws.findlaw.com/us/381/479.html ;
and
my earlier comments at
http://www.essaysandcommentaries.com/abortion-prostitutiondrugs.html


2. EACH STATE WILL THEN WRITE ITS OWN ABORTION LAWS, AS IT CHOOSES TO
DO

Some states will permit abortions; some will not. Restrictions will
vary according to the decisions of each state, acting through its
legislature.

The Public will insist that some exceptions be made for the life and
health of the mother, and the various state legislatures will provide
these exceptions.

The barbaric, murderous procedure of "Partial Birth Abortion" will
surely be banned everywhere. (This is the sickening procedure by which
the "physician" murders the fully-developed baby as it is being born,
by stabbing it in the head with scissors. It is never medically
necessary unless the doctors on the case have been grossly negligent
beforehand.)

Women who live in abortion-forbidden states will be able to travel to
abortion-legal states. The various pro-abortion groups will be free to
help them financially, if needed.


###


Blessings to you. May you thrive and prosper in all things.


Rev. Bill McGinnis, Editor - THE CIVIC AMERICAN


http://CivicAmerican.com

This page is brought to you by http://LoveAllPeople.org
To support us, please buy from Our Affiliates.

It would do you pro-birth wackos some good to read the Roe v. Wade decision,
something that you obviously have not done.

That's called an assumption... When you "assume" you make an ***** out
of u and, well you.

Roe v. Wade had little to do with choice, nothing to do with "morality," and
everything to do with public health and safety. At the time of Roe v. Wade,
women were having abortions -- some were done by physicians, secretly, most
were done by amateur abortionists with resulting infections, death, and
permanent damage to the woman.

Who fucking cares! I find it a little hard to be sympathetic towards
someone who kills their own child. I think it is sweet irony and
justice that someone goes to the abortion doctor, murders her baby and
ends up dying afterward.

The AMA came down squarely on the side of
legal abortions --

Of course they did, they can make more money if the volume is up.

they did not want doctors going to jail for something
everyone was doing anyway,

If "everyone" jumped off a bridge would you. If yes then everyone did
jump off a bridge, so for the sake of humanity please go jump off a
bridge.

and, they wanted to protect public health.

If they wanted to protect public health then they would hand out
condoms, with instructions, because obviously these women did not know
how to use a condom hence they are knocked up. This means that they
are also prone to STDs, If you want to protect public health on that
end of the spectrum, abortion isn't it, rubbers are.

Joe S. wrote:

"explorerthedog" <exp1943@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1120976856.212966.11040@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

When Roe v. Wade Is Overturned, What Will Happen Then?

Each State Will Write Its Own Abortion Laws; Some Will Allow Abortion,
Some Will Not. Restrictions Will Vary.


HTML page at
http://essaysandcommentaries.com/whenroevwadeisoverturned.html

Commentary and Opinion by Rev. Bill McGinnis

This is what's going to happen regarding abortion law in the United
States. Get ready, because these things are going to happen. And in a
few years, after all the dust has settled, you can remember that you
read it here first.

1. ROE v. WADE WILL BE OVERTURNED.

The legal reasoning behind Woe v. Wade and its predecessor,Griswold v.
Connecticut is weak and flimsy, unworthy of the United States Supreme
Court. As I have shown elsewhere, if abortion is a legal right, as Roe
v. Wade asserts, then prostitution, drug use, and possession of child
pornography must also be legal rights, following the logic of Roe v.
Wade.

Carried to its logical conclusion, Roe v. Wade would prevent the
Federal and state governments from regulating most kinds of personal
behavior, because in each case, the newly-discovered privacy and
liberty rights would outweigh the long-established inherent rights of
Government to define and punish criminal behavior, which Roe v. Wade
basically ignores.

Perhaps the extreme Libertarians would think that this is a good idea -
unrestricted personal behavior. If so, it will be interesting to see
how they join together with the pro-abortion leftists to defend Roe v.
Wade.

Please see Roe v. Wade at http://laws.findlaw.com/us/410/113.html ;
Griswold v. Connecticut at http://laws.findlaw.com/us/381/479.html ;
and
my earlier comments at
http://www.essaysandcommentaries.com/abortion-prostitutiondrugs.html


2. EACH STATE WILL THEN WRITE ITS OWN ABORTION LAWS, AS IT CHOOSES TO
DO

Some states will permit abortions; some will not. Restrictions will
vary according to the decisions of each state, acting through its
legislature.

The Public will insist that some exceptions be made for the life and
health of the mother, and the various state legislatures will provide
these exceptions.

The barbaric, murderous procedure of "Partial Birth Abortion" will
surely be banned everywhere. (This is the sickening procedure by which
the "physician" murders the fully-developed baby as it is being born,
by stabbing it in the head with scissors. It is never medically
necessary unless the doctors on the case have been grossly negligent
beforehand.)

Women who live in abortion-forbidden states will be able to travel to
abortion-legal states. The various pro-abortion groups will be free to
help them financially, if needed.


###


Blessings to you. May you thrive and prosper in all things.


Rev. Bill McGinnis, Editor - THE CIVIC AMERICAN


http://CivicAmerican.com

This page is brought to you by http://LoveAllPeople.org
To support us, please buy from Our Affiliates.

It would do you pro-birth wackos some good to read the Roe v. Wade
decision,
something that you obviously have not done.

That's called an assumption... When you "assume" you make an ***** out
of u and, well you.

Roe v. Wade had little to do with choice, nothing to do with "morality,"
and
everything to do with public health and safety. At the time of Roe v.
Wade,
women were having abortions -- some were done by physicians, secretly,
most
were done by amateur abortionists with resulting infections, death, and
permanent damage to the woman.

Who fucking cares! I find it a little hard to be sympathetic towards
someone who kills their own child. I think it is sweet irony and
justice that someone goes to the abortion doctor, murders her baby and
ends up dying afterward.

The AMA came down squarely on the side of
legal abortions --

Of course they did, they can make more money if the volume is up.

they did not want doctors going to jail for something
everyone was doing anyway,

If "everyone" jumped off a bridge would you. If yes then everyone did
jump off a bridge, so for the sake of humanity please go jump off a
bridge.

and, they wanted to protect public health.

If they wanted to protect public health then they would hand out
condoms, with instructions, because obviously these women did not know
how to use a condom hence they are knocked up. This means that they
are also prone to STDs, If you want to protect public health on that
end of the spectrum, abortion isn't it, rubbers are.

It's about time someone made that argument so we can get away from the
useless distractions inserted by the holyrollers and biblethumpers.


--

-----
Joe S.