| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Roedy Green" |
| Date: |
27 Jan 2004 02:50:41 AM |
| Object: |
Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
Look how many articles reprinted here condemn Bush. You think there
would be at least almost an equal number praising Bush's handling of
various issues. Are his supporters all illiterate?
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming.
See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary.
.
|
|
| User: "Joe Myers" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
27 Jan 2004 03:13:32 AM |
|
|
"Roedy Green" <look-at-the-website@mindprod.com> wrote
Look how many articles reprinted here condemn Bush. You think there
would be at least almost an equal number praising Bush's handling of
various issues. Are his supporters all illiterate?
Probably not.
But do you really want a lot of threads that consist of "GWBush!!! He's not
as stupid as it seems!!!!"?
.
|
|
|
| User: "EagleEye" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
27 Jan 2004 03:23:37 AM |
|
|
"Joe Myers" <monkeyhawk@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:0ZpRb.16713$MD4.4866@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...
"Roedy Green" <look-at-the-website@mindprod.com> wrote
Look how many articles reprinted here condemn Bush. You think there
would be at least almost an equal number praising Bush's handling of
various issues. Are his supporters all illiterate?
Probably not.
But do you really want a lot of threads that consist of "GWBush!!! He's
not
as stupid as it seems!!!!"?
I wonder where those threads would terminate?
*_^
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "sparkup" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
27 Jan 2004 05:15:42 AM |
|
|
"Roedy Green" <look-at-the-website@mindprod.com> wrote in message
news:qe9c10tt4hs1b7j5i7k7833efo60kjueu9@4ax.com...
Look how many articles reprinted here condemn Bush. You think there
would be at least almost an equal number praising Bush's handling of
various issues. Are his supporters all illiterate?
I suppose that would be one valid reason for being a Bush supporter.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "George Johnson" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
27 Jan 2004 03:02:37 PM |
|
|
"Roedy Green" <look-at-the-website@mindprod.com> wrote in message
news:qe9c10tt4hs1b7j5i7k7833efo60kjueu9@4ax.com...
| Look how many articles reprinted here condemn Bush. You think there
| would be at least almost an equal number praising Bush's handling of
| various issues. Are his supporters all illiterate?
|
| --
| Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
| Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming.
| See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary.
I'm not prejudiced.
If the Criminal Traitor Pathological-Lifetime-Liar SUPERFRAUD George
Worthless Bubba Bush EVER DOES ANYTHING OF MERIT, I will post it.
As of yet, it has all been lies, thievery, cheap phony photo-scams,
blame-shifting, incompetence, greed, and embarrassing ignorance. IDI DADA
AMIN was not this awful to the nation he murdered and bled dry as the
Criminal Traitor Pathological-Lifetime-Liar SUPERFRAUD George Worthless
Bubba Bush has been to America.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Aaron" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
28 Jan 2004 12:25:36 AM |
|
|
Here's a pro-Bush story...
KERRY: CONFUSED WITH OWN POSITION RE: IRAQ
Tuesday, Jan. 27, 2004 1:02 p.m. EST
Kerry: Bush Better Than Clinton on Iraq
In an attempt to justify his vote in favor of the October 2002 Iraq war
resolution,
Sen. John Kerry found himself inadvertently defending President Bush on
Monday, saying he backed the measure because he thought President
Clinton hadn't used enough force against Iraq.
"All of a sudden in 1998, Saddam Hussein doesn't cooperate, Bill Clinton
pulls our [weapons] inspectors out so we could bomb for four or five
days. Which we did," Kerry told a Keene, N.H., crowd.
But in quotes picked up by the New York Sun, Kerry then complained:
"That's it. End of story. Saddam Hussein is left alone. No inspectors go
back in."
When the Bush administration presented the same evidence President
Clinton used to justify the 1998 attack, Kerry said he was compelled to
authorize the use of force because he had tried and failed to persuade
Clinton to do the same thing.
"So, George Bush brings a legitimate security issue before the Congress
in 2002," the Democratic front-runner told the crowd. "Am I supposed to
turn away and ignore what I said in 1998, what I thought Clinton should
have done?"
In comments that further bolster the Bush administration's case for war
in Iraq, Kerry reminded his audience that weapons inspectors had already
uncovered not just evidence of weapons of mass destruction programs but
tons of biological and chemical weapons themselves, along with a
thriving nuclear program.
"From the moment that we kicked [Saddam] out of Kuwait in the early
1990s, all the way through 1998, we had an American team on the ground
under Ambassador [Richard] Butler destroying weapons of mass
destruction," the Massachusetts Democrat explained. "People are quick to
forget that," Kerry added. "Very quick to forget that."
"For seven and a half years," he continued, "we destroyed weapons of
mass destruction, folks, and you know what, we found he had more of them
than we thought he had. And we found he was further down the road to the
creation of nuclear weapons than we thought he was."
Apparently sensing he had gone too far in defending Bush, Kerry returned
to the rhetoric of his standard stump speech, telling the audience that
he voted not in favor of a war but in favor of a "process promised by
the president."
"If you think I would have gone to war the way George Bush did, don't
vote for me," he urged.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "EagleEye" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
27 Jan 2004 03:08:10 AM |
|
|
I suppose you could say that they are antidisestablishmentarianists (longest
word in the english language), and only know what they are against, and not
what they are FOR.
"Roedy Green" <look-at-the-website@mindprod.com> wrote in message
news:qe9c10tt4hs1b7j5i7k7833efo60kjueu9@4ax.com...
Look how many articles reprinted here condemn Bush. You think there
would be at least almost an equal number praising Bush's handling of
various issues. Are his supporters all illiterate?
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming.
See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary.
.
|
|
|
| User: "EagleEye" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
27 Jan 2004 03:20:26 AM |
|
|
"EagleEye" <eagleeye@omega.org> wrote in message
news:3UpRb.11163$mf4.693043@news20.bellglobal.com...
I suppose you could say that they are antidisestablishmentarianists
(longest
word in the english language), and only know what they are against, and
not
what they are FOR.
Bush couldn't possibly pronounce or even fathom such a word as
antidisestablishmentarianism. He can't even pronouce the word nuclear.
I think it's time Roedy to post every Bush verbal gaff you can find for our
collective amusement and to reaffirm that such a man cannot be permitted to
grace the oval office.
It's time to fire the Bush.
What is truly amazing is that a firestorm has not already engulfed his
administration. Goes to show how much the Jewish controlled media empire
cowtows to it's own self interests in favouring a corrupted chief priest
sitting in the apex of the structure.
Someone somewhere ought to take the cord/thread of lies, and whip these
money changers and chase them from that temple.
"Roedy Green" <look-at-the-website@mindprod.com> wrote in message
news:qe9c10tt4hs1b7j5i7k7833efo60kjueu9@4ax.com...
Look how many articles reprinted here condemn Bush. You think there
would be at least almost an equal number praising Bush's handling of
various issues. Are his supporters all illiterate?
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming.
See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Edw" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
27 Jan 2004 09:33:42 AM |
|
|
"EagleEye" <eagleeye@omega.org> wrote in message
news:z3qRb.11277$mf4.694193@news20.bellglobal.com...
"EagleEye" <eagleeye@omega.org> wrote in message
news:3UpRb.11163$mf4.693043@news20.bellglobal.com...
I suppose you could say that they are antidisestablishmentarianists
(longest
word in the english language), and only know what they are against, and
not
what they are FOR.
Bush couldn't possibly pronounce or even fathom such a word as
antidisestablishmentarianism. He can't even pronouce the word nuclear.
I think it's time Roedy to post every Bush verbal gaff you can find for
our
collective amusement and to reaffirm that such a man cannot be permitted
to
grace the oval office.
It's time to fire the Bush.
What is truly amazing is that a firestorm has not already engulfed his
administration. Goes to show how much the Jewish controlled media empire
cowtows to it's own self interests in favouring a corrupted chief priest
sitting in the apex of the structure.
Someone somewhere ought to take the cord/thread of lies, and whip these
money changers and chase them from that temple.
Sorry to be an interloper. My favorite Bushism: "The trouble with the
French is they have no word for 'entrepreneur.'"
"Roedy Green" <look-at-the-website@mindprod.com> wrote in message
news:qe9c10tt4hs1b7j5i7k7833efo60kjueu9@4ax.com...
Look how many articles reprinted here condemn Bush. You think there
would be at least almost an equal number praising Bush's handling of
various issues. Are his supporters all illiterate?
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming.
See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary.
.
|
|
|
| User: "OrionCA" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
27 Jan 2004 10:29:41 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:33:42 GMT, "Edw" <theotts@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Sorry to be an interloper. My favorite Bushism: "The trouble with the
French is they have no word for 'entrepreneur.'"
Except he never said that.
http://www.snopes.com/quotes/bush.htm
Now, don't you feel stupid for being taken in by an Internet rumor?
--
From the official Howard Dean website forum,
A typical Dean supporter comments on the
capture of the mass murderer Saddam Hussein:
Carrie B: "I can't believe this. I'm crying here. I
feel that we now don't have a chance in this election."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Edw" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
27 Jan 2004 10:41:12 PM |
|
|
"OrionCA" <orionca@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:phee105mr6vhjm4qvvkhbv4dqt7g3ddkn5@4ax.com...
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:33:42 GMT, "Edw" <theotts@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Sorry to be an interloper. My favorite Bushism: "The trouble with the
French is they have no word for 'entrepreneur.'"
Except he never said that.
http://www.snopes.com/quotes/bush.htm
Now, don't you feel stupid for being taken in by an Internet rumor?
Perhaps you were taken in:
http://www.google.com/search?as_q=&num=10&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=no+word+for+entrepreneur&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&safe=images
--
From the official Howard Dean website forum,
A typical Dean supporter comments on the
capture of the mass murderer Saddam Hussein:
Carrie B: "I can't believe this. I'm crying here. I
feel that we now don't have a chance in this election."
.
|
|
|
| User: "OrionCA" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
29 Jan 2004 10:28:57 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 04:41:12 GMT, "Edw" <theotts@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
"OrionCA" <orionca@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:phee105mr6vhjm4qvvkhbv4dqt7g3ddkn5@4ax.com...
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:33:42 GMT, "Edw" <theotts@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Sorry to be an interloper. My favorite Bushism: "The trouble with the
French is they have no word for 'entrepreneur.'"
Except he never said that.
http://www.snopes.com/quotes/bush.htm
Now, don't you feel stupid for being taken in by an Internet rumor?
Perhaps you were taken in:
http://www.google.com/search?as_q=&num=10&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=no+word+for+entrepreneur&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&safe=images
Those are all Anti-Bush websites. Snopes.com is a non-partisan
website devoted to dispelling urban myths and rumors. They dispel
myths about, say, Bill Clinton as much as George W. Bush. They
actually went out and RESEARCH, not just repeat Internet rumors.
You Bush-haters repeat lies a million times; it doesn't make them
true. When confronted with the truth you deny it and so make
yourselves look foolish.
--
From the official Howard Dean website forum,
A typical Dean supporter comments on the
capture of the mass murderer Saddam Hussein:
Carrie B: "I can't believe this. I'm crying here. I
feel that we now don't have a chance in this election."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joe Myers" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
29 Jan 2004 01:07:33 PM |
|
|
"OrionCA" <orionca@earthlink.net> wrote
[snip]
You Bush-haters repeat lies a million times; it doesn't make them
true. When confronted with the truth you deny it and so make
yourselves look foolish.
One would think that the types who claim Al Gore said he invented the
Internet would be more circumspect when insulting those who confront them
with the truth.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Edw" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
29 Jan 2004 01:37:10 PM |
|
|
"Joe Myers" <monkeyhawk@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:VRcSb.17732$k56.11501@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...
"OrionCA" <orionca@earthlink.net> wrote
[snip]
You Bush-haters repeat lies a million times; it doesn't make them
true. When confronted with the truth you deny it and so make
yourselves look foolish.
One would think that the types who claim Al Gore said he invented the
Internet would be more circumspect when insulting those who confront them
with the truth.
Two flaws in your ersatz argument; Al Gore never said he "invented the
internet;" none of us said he did.
Just exactly what "truth" do you think you've "confronted [us] with..?" Do
you mean that upon which insist in the face of contrary evidence?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joe Myers" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
29 Jan 2004 02:24:42 PM |
|
|
"Edw" <theotts@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:GhdSb.6009$BA2.4143@newssvr26.news.prodigy.com...
"Joe Myers" <monkeyhawk@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:VRcSb.17732$k56.11501@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...
"OrionCA" <orionca@earthlink.net> wrote
[snip]
You Bush-haters repeat lies a million times; it doesn't make them
true. When confronted with the truth you deny it and so make
yourselves look foolish.
One would think that the types who claim Al Gore said he invented the
Internet would be more circumspect when insulting those who confront
them
with the truth.
Two flaws in your ersatz argument; Al Gore never said he "invented the
internet;" none of us said he did.
This must be the Lenny Bruce corolarry to the Big Lie technique!
He used to say, "Never tell her. Not if you love your wife. In fact, if your
old lady walks in on you, deny it. Yeah, just flat out deny it and she'll
believe you. ' I'm tellin' ya this chick came downstairs with a sign around
her neck, Lay On Top Of Me Or I'll Die. I didn't know what I was gonna do'."
Just exactly what "truth" do you think you've "confronted [us] with..?"
Do
you mean that upon which insist in the face of contrary evidence?
Try restating your question in the form of a language.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Edw" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
29 Jan 2004 03:03:46 PM |
|
|
"Joe Myers" <monkeyhawk@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:e_dSb.17750$DX6.13023@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...
"Edw" <theotts@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:GhdSb.6009$BA2.4143@newssvr26.news.prodigy.com...
"Joe Myers" <monkeyhawk@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:VRcSb.17732$k56.11501@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...
"OrionCA" <orionca@earthlink.net> wrote
[snip]
You Bush-haters repeat lies a million times; it doesn't make them
true. When confronted with the truth you deny it and so make
yourselves look foolish.
One would think that the types who claim Al Gore said he invented the
Internet would be more circumspect when insulting those who confront
them
with the truth.
Two flaws in your ersatz argument; Al Gore never said he "invented the
internet;" none of us said he did.
This must be the Lenny Bruce corolarry to the Big Lie technique!
He used to say, "Never tell her. Not if you love your wife. In fact, if
your
old lady walks in on you, deny it. Yeah, just flat out deny it and she'll
believe you. ' I'm tellin' ya this chick came downstairs with a sign
around
her neck, Lay On Top Of Me Or I'll Die. I didn't know what I was gonna
do'."
You may have heard of Lenny Bruce, but the truth continues to elude you.
Just exactly what "truth" do you think you've "confronted [us] with..?"
Do
you mean that upon which insist in the face of contrary evidence?
Try restating your question in the form of a language.
Sorry. I assumed you were fluent in at least one language. Would you prefer
a rebus?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "OrionCA" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
30 Jan 2004 02:45:28 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 19:07:33 GMT, "Joe Myers"
<monkeyhawk@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
"OrionCA" <orionca@earthlink.net> wrote
[snip]
You Bush-haters repeat lies a million times; it doesn't make them
true. When confronted with the truth you deny it and so make
yourselves look foolish.
One would think that the types who claim Al Gore said he invented the
Internet would be more circumspect when insulting those who confront them
with the truth.
Lost the argument so you're changing the subject, eh? "I took the
lead in creating the Internet" is, by any reasonable interpretation
bombastic and conceited which is really why we laughed at him. Had Al
Gore died as a young man from his sister's secondhand smoke - or
slipped and broken his neck from "hoeing, chopping, stacking, and
packing" tobacco on his father's farm, as he put it, the Internet
would still have evolved in exactly the same form as it did.
Gore's mouth got him in more trouble: He drove his handlers crazy
because he just couldn't stop himself. "Mah momma sang me to sleep
with the "Look for the Union Label" song" - yeah, right. That song
was written in the mid-70s, long after Gore had grown up and moved out
of "his momma's" house. The Internet flap was simply one in a long
string of sefl-serving and easily refuted distortions,
misrepresentations, and outright lies by the Gorebot.
--
From the official Howard Dean website forum,
A typical Dean supporter comments on the
capture of the mass murderer Saddam Hussein:
Carrie B: "I can't believe this. I'm crying here. I
feel that we now don't have a chance in this election."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joe Myers" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
30 Jan 2004 01:00:33 PM |
|
|
"OrionCA" <orionca@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:fv5k105d250t21p0oeulkca7olmbhkdb2e@4ax.com...
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 19:07:33 GMT, "Joe Myers"
<monkeyhawk@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
"OrionCA" <orionca@earthlink.net> wrote
[snip]
You Bush-haters repeat lies a million times; it doesn't make them
true. When confronted with the truth you deny it and so make
yourselves look foolish.
One would think that the types who claim Al Gore said he invented the
Internet would be more circumspect when insulting those who confront them
with the truth.
Lost the argument so you're changing the subject, eh? "I took the
lead in creating the Internet" is, by any reasonable interpretation
bombastic and conceited which is really why we laughed at him. Had Al
Gore died as a young man from his sister's secondhand smoke - or
slipped and broken his neck from "hoeing, chopping, stacking, and
packing" tobacco on his father's farm, as he put it, the Internet
would still have evolved in exactly the same form as it did.
Ah, the old "sine quo non criteria" fallacy; "it would have happened
anyway." *Somebody* would have freed the slaves eventually, so Lincoln
doesn't deserve the credit.
Just because the Internet evolved the way it has in no way supports the
assertion that it was inevitable. The developers of ARPANET could have kept
the technology within the government, the military, academia...
Your resorting to logical fallacy indicates that you, in fact, lost the
argument.
Gore's mouth got him in more trouble: He drove his handlers crazy
because he just couldn't stop himself. "Mah momma sang me to sleep
with the "Look for the Union Label" song" - yeah, right. That song
was written in the mid-70s, long after Gore had grown up and moved out
of "his momma's" house.
"Metaphorical hyperbole," as if someone who says, "I was raised on rock and
roll" would be branded as a "liar" if one produced evidence someone had
given them food somewhere along the way.
Another logical fallacy.
What's next? You're headed straight toward "Reductio ad Absurdum."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Edw" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
29 Jan 2004 11:29:10 AM |
|
|
"OrionCA" <orionca@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:suci109bjjouf23u1s7ri8u855ikroo7vu@4ax.com...
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 04:41:12 GMT, "Edw" <theotts@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
"OrionCA" <orionca@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:phee105mr6vhjm4qvvkhbv4dqt7g3ddkn5@4ax.com...
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:33:42 GMT, "Edw" <theotts@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Sorry to be an interloper. My favorite Bushism: "The trouble with the
French is they have no word for 'entrepreneur.'"
Except he never said that.
http://www.snopes.com/quotes/bush.htm
Now, don't you feel stupid for being taken in by an Internet rumor?
Perhaps you were taken in:
http://www.google.com/search?as_q=&num=10&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&btnG=Goog
le+Search&as_epq=no+word+for+entrepreneur&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filet
ype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&safe=images
Those are all Anti-Bush websites. Snopes.com is a non-partisan
website devoted to dispelling urban myths and rumors. They dispel
myths about, say, Bill Clinton as much as George W. Bush. They
actually went out and RESEARCH, not just repeat Internet rumors.
You Bush-haters repeat lies a million times; it doesn't make them
true. When confronted with the truth you deny it and so make
yourselves look foolish.
You want to talk about making yourself look foolish? Look again at the link
I posted. It's one site, the results of a Google search. The search
string, as you non-fools undoubtedly know, is embedded in the link. Now, O
monarch of mummery, how precisely does that yield "Anti-Bush (sic)
websites?" Reality is naturally endowed with a bias against Bush? Or is it
just that your spin guide from the fascist youth support group pointed you
to the site you linked, and you didn't pursue any of those from the Google
search?
Perhaps you misunderestimate us. ...or anyway, they do in Texas, probably in
Tennessee, or someplace, maybe.
--
From the official Howard Dean website forum,
A typical Dean supporter comments on the
capture of the mass murderer Saddam Hussein:
Carrie B: "I can't believe this. I'm crying here. I
feel that we now don't have a chance in this election."
.
|
|
|
| User: "r_c_brown" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
29 Jan 2004 05:06:39 PM |
|
|
"Edw" <theotts@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:<GpbSb.5955$BA2.231@newssvr26.news.prodigy.com>...
"OrionCA" <orionca@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:suci109bjjouf23u1s7ri8u855ikroo7vu@4ax.com...
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 04:41:12 GMT, "Edw" <theotts@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
"OrionCA" <orionca@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:phee105mr6vhjm4qvvkhbv4dqt7g3ddkn5@4ax.com...
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:33:42 GMT, "Edw" <theotts@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Sorry to be an interloper. My favorite Bushism: "The trouble with the
French is they have no word for 'entrepreneur.'"
Except he never said that.
http://www.snopes.com/quotes/bush.htm
Now, don't you feel stupid for being taken in by an Internet rumor?
Perhaps you were taken in:
http://www.google.com/search?as_q=&num=10&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&btnG=Goog
le+Search&as_epq=no+word+for+entrepreneur&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filet
ype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&safe=images
Those are all Anti-Bush websites. Snopes.com is a non-partisan
website devoted to dispelling urban myths and rumors. They dispel
myths about, say, Bill Clinton as much as George W. Bush. They
actually went out and RESEARCH, not just repeat Internet rumors.
You Bush-haters repeat lies a million times; it doesn't make them
true. When confronted with the truth you deny it and so make
yourselves look foolish.
You want to talk about making yourself look foolish? Look again at the link
I posted. It's one site, the results of a Google search. The search
string, as you non-fools undoubtedly know, is embedded in the link. Now, O
monarch of mummery, how precisely does that yield "Anti-Bush (sic)
websites?" Reality is naturally endowed with a bias against Bush? Or is it
just that your spin guide from the fascist youth support group pointed you
to the site you linked, and you didn't pursue any of those from the Google
search?
Perhaps you misunderestimate us. ...or anyway, they do in Texas, probably in
Tennessee, or someplace, maybe.
Did you take a look at the Snopes site? The 'entrepreneur' line
really is an urban legend:
http://www.snopes.com/quotes/bush.htm
There's plenty of other time where the President has screwed up the
language or otherwise made goofy remarks; this isn't one of 'em.
--
From the official Howard Dean website forum,
A typical Dean supporter comments on the
capture of the mass murderer Saddam Hussein:
Carrie B: "I can't believe this. I'm crying here. I
feel that we now don't have a chance in this election."
.
|
|
|
| User: "OrionCA" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
30 Jan 2004 02:48:15 AM |
|
|
On 29 Jan 2004 15:06:39 -0800, (r_c_brown)
wrote:
You want to talk about making yourself look foolish? Look again at the link
I posted. It's one site, the results of a Google search. The search
string, as you non-fools undoubtedly know, is embedded in the link. Now, O
monarch of mummery, how precisely does that yield "Anti-Bush (sic)
websites?" Reality is naturally endowed with a bias against Bush? Or is it
just that your spin guide from the fascist youth support group pointed you
to the site you linked, and you didn't pursue any of those from the Google
search?
Perhaps you misunderestimate us. ...or anyway, they do in Texas, probably in
Tennessee, or someplace, maybe.
Did you take a look at the Snopes site? The 'entrepreneur' line
really is an urban legend:
http://www.snopes.com/quotes/bush.htm
There's plenty of other time where the President has screwed up the
language or otherwise made goofy remarks; this isn't one of 'em.
He doesn't WANT to look at it. These luzers sit around in a web ring
circle-jerk telling each other lies about Bush. Periodically they
stumble out into the real world, get laughed at, and whine that we're
all "fascists" when we prove them wrong.
--
From the official Howard Dean website forum,
A typical Dean supporter comments on the
capture of the mass murderer Saddam Hussein:
Carrie B: "I can't believe this. I'm crying here. I
feel that we now don't have a chance in this election."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Edw" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
30 Jan 2004 12:26:25 PM |
|
|
"OrionCA" <orionca@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:me6k1092ru8ol8ec1so36jtjietfps69dc@4ax.com...
On 29 Jan 2004 15:06:39 -0800, (r_c_brown)
wrote:
You want to talk about making yourself look foolish? Look again at the
link
I posted. It's one site, the results of a Google search. The search
string, as you non-fools undoubtedly know, is embedded in the link.
Now, O
monarch of mummery, how precisely does that yield "Anti-Bush (sic)
websites?" Reality is naturally endowed with a bias against Bush? Or
is it
just that your spin guide from the fascist youth support group pointed
you
to the site you linked, and you didn't pursue any of those from the
Google
search?
Perhaps you misunderestimate us. ...or anyway, they do in Texas,
probably in
Tennessee, or someplace, maybe.
Did you take a look at the Snopes site? The 'entrepreneur' line
really is an urban legend:
http://www.snopes.com/quotes/bush.htm
There's plenty of other time where the President has screwed up the
language or otherwise made goofy remarks; this isn't one of 'em.
He doesn't WANT to look at it. These luzers sit around in a web ring
circle-jerk telling each other lies about Bush. Periodically they
stumble out into the real world, get laughed at, and whine that we're
all "fascists" when we prove them wrong.
I haven't been in Usenet long, but I'll go out on a limb here; OrionCA has
never proved anyone wrong.
I read the link. It's one person making a bald assertion. You probably
didn't chase down any (or many) of mine as two of them are aware of the site
OrionCA posted. And they're still making the claim that Bush did say that.
If you have any ability to judge of things objectively, you'll see that it
is therefor a matter of controversy. So, I was not, as the screamer said
"taken in." He's merely choosing to believe that which is most agreeable to
his jaundiced view.
My apologies to you r_c_brown if any this is offensive to you.
--
From the official Howard Dean website forum,
A typical Dean supporter comments on the
capture of the mass murderer Saddam Hussein:
Carrie B: "I can't believe this. I'm crying here. I
feel that we now don't have a chance in this election."
.
|
|
|
| User: "r_c_brown" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
30 Jan 2004 05:05:16 PM |
|
|
"Edw" <theotts@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:<llxSb.6314$BA2.2253@newssvr26.news.prodigy.com>...
"OrionCA" <orionca@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:me6k1092ru8ol8ec1so36jtjietfps69dc@4ax.com...
On 29 Jan 2004 15:06:39 -0800, (r_c_brown)
wrote:
You want to talk about making yourself look foolish? Look again at the
link
I posted. It's one site, the results of a Google search. The search
string, as you non-fools undoubtedly know, is embedded in the link.
Now, O
monarch of mummery, how precisely does that yield "Anti-Bush (sic)
websites?" Reality is naturally endowed with a bias against Bush? Or
is it
just that your spin guide from the fascist youth support group pointed
you
to the site you linked, and you didn't pursue any of those from the
Google
search?
Perhaps you misunderestimate us. ...or anyway, they do in Texas,
probably in
Tennessee, or someplace, maybe.
Did you take a look at the Snopes site? The 'entrepreneur' line
really is an urban legend:
http://www.snopes.com/quotes/bush.htm
There's plenty of other time where the President has screwed up the
language or otherwise made goofy remarks; this isn't one of 'em.
He doesn't WANT to look at it. These luzers sit around in a web ring
circle-jerk telling each other lies about Bush. Periodically they
stumble out into the real world, get laughed at, and whine that we're
all "fascists" when we prove them wrong.
I haven't been in Usenet long, but I'll go out on a limb here; OrionCA has
never proved anyone wrong.
I have been around Usenet since just before the Clinton impeachment
mess.
I don't really know OrionCA, so I cannot say one way or the other.
I read the link. It's one person making a bald assertion. You probably
didn't chase down any (or many) of mine as two of them are aware of the site
OrionCA posted. And they're still making the claim that Bush did say that.
I have looked at a bunch of those sites.
I've come to trust the Snopes site.
If you have any ability to judge of things objectively, you'll see that it
is therefor a matter of controversy. So, I was not, as the screamer said
"taken in." He's merely choosing to believe that which is most agreeable to
his jaundiced view.
I think I look at things objectively. I agree that there are a lot of
people who will only see the stuff they have decided on in advance.
I'll ask you to trust me when I say I'm not one of those.
Again, I trust the Snopes site. There are tons of Bushisms; I don't
think this is one of them.
My apologies to you r_c_brown if any this is offensive to you.
No offense whatsoever. Likewise, I meant none to you.
--
From the official Howard Dean website forum,
A typical Dean supporter comments on the
capture of the mass murderer Saddam Hussein:
Carrie B: "I can't believe this. I'm crying here. I
feel that we now don't have a chance in this election."
.
|
|
|
| User: "OrionCA" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
30 Jan 2004 08:17:37 PM |
|
|
Edw" <theotts@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
ews:<llxSb.6314$BA2.2253@newssvr26.news.prodigy.com>...
I haven't been in Usenet long,
That's fairly obvious.
but I'll go out on a limb here; OrionCA has never proved anyone wrong.
*bzzt* thankyewforplayingwehavesomelovelypartinggifts.
--
Is John Kerry two-faced? In a Jan 11, 1991 letter to a constituent:
"Thank you for contacting me to express your opposition to the
early use of military force by the U.S. against Iraq. I share your
concerns. On Jan. 11, I voted in favor of a resolution that would
have insisted that economic sanctions be given more time to work
and against a resolution giving the president the immediate
authority to go to war."
In a Jan 31, 1991 letter he wrote: "Thank you very much for
contacting me to express your support for the actions of
President Bush in response to the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait.
From the outset of the invasion, I have strongly and
unequivocally supported President Bush's response to the
crisis and the policy goals he has established with our
military deployment in the Persian Gulf."
Same constituent. Two faced? Nahhh...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Edw" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
30 Jan 2004 10:13:41 PM |
|
|
"OrionCA" <orionca@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:ik3m10dt2k7dg47ipii8g9n0i4rqiccsdb@4ax.com...
Edw" <theotts@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
ews:<llxSb.6314$BA2.2253@newssvr26.news.prodigy.com>...
I haven't been in Usenet long,
That's fairly obvious.
Gee, how perceptive of you, dipshit.
but I'll go out on a limb here; OrionCA has never proved anyone wrong.
*bzzt* thankyewforplayingwehavesomelovelypartinggifts.
--
Is John Kerry two-faced? In a Jan 11, 1991 letter to a constituent:
"Thank you for contacting me to express your opposition to the
early use of military force by the U.S. against Iraq. I share your
concerns. On Jan. 11, I voted in favor of a resolution that would
have insisted that economic sanctions be given more time to work
and against a resolution giving the president the immediate
authority to go to war."
In a Jan 31, 1991 letter he wrote: "Thank you very much for
contacting me to express your support for the actions of
President Bush in response to the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait.
From the outset of the invasion, I have strongly and
unequivocally supported President Bush's response to the
crisis and the policy goals he has established with our
military deployment in the Persian Gulf."
Same constituent. Two faced? Nahhh...
.
|
|
|
| User: "OrionCA" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
30 Jan 2004 11:22:28 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 04:13:41 GMT, "Edw" <theotts@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
"OrionCA" <orionca@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:ik3m10dt2k7dg47ipii8g9n0i4rqiccsdb@4ax.com...
Edw" <theotts@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
ews:<llxSb.6314$BA2.2253@newssvr26.news.prodigy.com>...
I haven't been in Usenet long,
That's fairly obvious.
Gee, how perceptive of you, dipshit.
Welcome to USENET. Now hand over your wallet, turn around, go home
quietly, and you won't get hurt. Much.
(Traditional greeting to USENET newbies.)
--
Is John Kerry two-faced? In a Jan 11, 1991 letter to a constituent:
"Thank you for contacting me to express your opposition to the
early use of military force by the U.S. against Iraq. I share your
concerns. On Jan. 11, I voted in favor of a resolution that would
have insisted that economic sanctions be given more time to work
and against a resolution giving the president the immediate
authority to go to war."
In a Jan 31, 1991 letter he wrote: "Thank you very much for
contacting me to express your support for the actions of
President Bush in response to the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait.
From the outset of the invasion, I have strongly and
unequivocally supported President Bush's response to the
crisis and the policy goals he has established with our
military deployment in the Persian Gulf."
Same constituent. Two faced? Nahhh...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "sparkup" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
27 Jan 2004 05:21:06 AM |
|
|
"EagleEye" <eagleeye@omega.org> wrote in message
news:3UpRb.11163$mf4.693043@news20.bellglobal.com...
I suppose you could say that they are antidisestablishmentarianists
(longest
word in the english language), and only know what they are against, and
not
what they are FOR.
I think the longest word (non-chemical-name) is
Hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia. It means a fear of long words. :)
Anyway, IIRC a group was set up against the antidisestablishmentarianists.
These guys call themselves the contraantidisestablishmentarianists, and are
deeply opposed to the principles of antidisestablishmentarianism (well, that
and they wanted to have the longest word in the english language).
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Griffin" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
27 Jan 2004 07:36:03 AM |
|
|
"EagleEye" <eagleeye@omega.org> wrote:
antidisestablishmentarianists (longest word in the english
language),
That isn't even close to the longest word!
Does anyone even remember Newt Gingrich? I wrote this for him a
few years ago. I hope he liked it, but he was pretty busy at
the time (1997), trying to restore the morning Hallelujah in
schools, so he probably never saw it. Wait, maybe he did...I
posted something like it in alt.tasteless.jokes. He seems like
the type who must have been a lurker there.
An "ode" to Newt Gingrich
"In our schools, let kids pray to be free,
from the church, academically;
Oh Lord, separate
the church from the state,"
he prayed pseudoantidisestablishmentarianistically.
As I said back then, this is a limerick if you pronounce the
last word with seven syllables.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Griffin" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
27 Jan 2004 06:52:25 AM |
|
|
Innocent Little Roedy Green was manipulated into showing his
puerility as follows:
Look how many articles reprinted here condemn Bush. You
think there would be at least almost an equal number
praising Bush's handling of various issues. Are his
supporters all illiterate?
Poor li'l imbecile Roedy...he thinks that vapid little remark
was clever. What's worse is that he just might be dumb enough to
think it was logical.
Impercipient little airhead, there are people who spend their
time manipulating drones like you into perpetuating the anti-
Bush stuff they feed you. Traditionally (and specifically in
this case), no one bothers to do that sort of thing on behalf of
the winner. That's all there is to it. The funny thing is that
some of your fellow morons will claim that this reply is
supportive of Bush, whereas it's clearly just an attempt to get
some handy information past your filters.
Now that you know, try not to cry.
That would be unmanly. <snicker>
P.S. Bush supporters had no trouble understanding the Florida
ballot. Furthermore, none of them were paid to claim they did.
Pretend you didn't see this. Punish me. rotfl.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Edw" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
27 Jan 2004 09:46:49 AM |
|
|
"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote in message
news:Xns947D30523F884thathillbillyyahooco@130.133.1.4...
Innocent Little Roedy Green was manipulated into showing his
puerility as follows:
Look how many articles reprinted here condemn Bush. You
think there would be at least almost an equal number
praising Bush's handling of various issues. Are his
supporters all illiterate?
Poor li'l imbecile Roedy...he thinks that vapid little remark
was clever. What's worse is that he just might be dumb enough to
think it was logical.
Impercipient little airhead, there are people who spend their
time manipulating drones like you into perpetuating the anti-
Bush stuff they feed you. Traditionally (and specifically in
this case), no one bothers to do that sort of thing on behalf of
the winner. That's all there is to it. The funny thing is that
some of your fellow morons will claim that this reply is
supportive of Bush, whereas it's clearly just an attempt to get
some handy information past your filters.
Were you trying to be incoherent? Some subtle satirical device? Well, you
did go a long to proving Roedy's point...
Now that you know, try not to cry.
That would be unmanly. <snicker>
P.S. Bush supporters had no trouble understanding the Florida
ballot. Furthermore, none of them were paid to claim they did.
None of them used butterfly ballots, did they, O! Master malaprop?
Pretend you didn't see this. Punish me. rotfl.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Griffin" |
|
| Title: Re: Where's the Pro Bush stuff? |
27 Jan 2004 07:12:23 PM |
|
|
"Edw" <theotts@sbcglobal.net> snivelled on cue:
"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote
Innocent Little Roedy Green was manipulated into showing
his puerility as follows:
Look how many articles reprinted here condemn Bush. You
think there would be at least almost an equal number
praising Bush's handling of various issues. Are his
supporters all illiterate?
Poor li'l imbecile Roedy...he thinks that vapid little
remark was clever. What's worse is that he just might be
dumb enough to think it was logical.
Impercipient little airhead, there are people who spend
their time manipulating drones like you into perpetuating
the anti- Bush stuff they feed you. Traditionally (and
specifically in this case), no one bothers to do that sort
of thing on behalf of the winner. That's all there is to
it. The funny thing is that some of your fellow morons
will claim that this reply is supportive of Bush, whereas
it's clearly just an attempt to get some handy information
past your filters.
Were you trying to be incoherent? Some subtle satirical
device? Well, you did go a long to proving Roedy's
point...
rotfl. What else could you say, since you don't have sense
enough to keep your head down? I have no intention of trying to
dumb that down to your level, and I can only suggest that you
spend some time trying to learn to read. Start now, since you
showed that you have a long way to go.
"Roedy's point," you bleat! Hilarious! Li'l Roedy's "point" is
that he's been told to hate George Bush and screech about it all
day.
Now that you know, try not to cry.
That would be unmanly. <snicker>
P.S. Bush supporters had no trouble understanding the
Florida ballot. Furthermore, none of them were paid to
claim they did.
None of them used butterfly ballots, did they, O! Master
malaprop?
<snicker> I reckon they did, but it doesn't matter. No one
thought the ballots were a problem until they were told to.
Pretend you didn't see this. Punish me. rotfl.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
