Where's the so-called liberal media on Bush AWOL story?



 Politics > Politics-USA > Where's the so-called liberal media on Bush AWOL story?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Harry Hope"
Date: 19 Jul 2003 04:44:47 PM
Object: Where's the so-called liberal media on Bush AWOL story?
From The Chicago Tribune, 5/6/03:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/showcase/chi-0305060077may06.column
Media AWOL in noting irony of Bush's flight
By Eric Zorn
So much for that myth--the cynical distortion that has become
conventional wisdom in many circles.
During the presidential campaign of 2000, it started going around that
Texas Gov. George W. Bush, then the leading Republican candidate, had
significant gaps in his military record.
Specifically, that Bush failed to report for duty for an entire year
toward the end of his hitch with the Texas Air National Guard.
The short version:
In May 1968 the silver-spoon son of a U.S. congressman jumped to the
top of a long waiting list despite mediocre scores on his
pilot-aptitude test and was allowed to enlist in the Guard, a common
way to avoid being drafted into combat in Vietnam.
In May 1972 he sought a transfer from Houston, where he flew F-102s on
weekends, to a unit in Montgomery, Ala.
There, he worked on the U.S. Senate campaign of a friend of his
father's and, records indicate, blew off his military obligations.
Bush failed to take his annual flight physical in 1972 so Guard
officials grounded him, the story went.
He never flew again and received an early discharge to go to graduate
school.
His final officer-efficiency report from May 1973 noted only that
supervisors hadn't seen him or heard from him.
Bush's campaign biography obscured or misrepresented these details.
In the summer and fall of 2000, his spokesmen offered various and
evolving explanations for what Democrats said represented a far bigger
"character issue" than any of the windy exaggerations of their
candidate, Vice President Al Gore.
"If he is elected president, how will he be able to deal as commander
in chief with someone who goes AWOL, when he did the same thing?"
Nebraska Sen. Bob Kerrey said to the Boston Globe, where veteran
investigative reporter Walter V. Robinson, a former Army intelligence
officer, wrote several major stories on the subject.
"This stinks."
Yes, but like Bush at the end of his hitch, it didn't fly.
A search of all news publications and programs archived in the
LexisNexis database for the last seven months of the 2000 campaign
found 114 stories referencing Bush, the Texas Air National Guard and
Alabama.
Over that same span, nearly 10 times that many stories--1,076 to be
exact--referenced Al Gore and the expression "invented the internet,"
an allusion to the bogus charge then haunting Gore that he had wildly
inflated his role in the online revolution.
The "Bush AWOL?" story appeared in this newspaper and was based on
good reporting and still-unanswered questions.
It faded away--a scant 14 mentions in the database for all of 2001 and
2002 due to the age of the allegations, the lack of any new
developments and the urgency of current events.
Last week, though, the president all but wore a "Kick Me!" sticker on
the back of his flight suit when he decided to land on the deck of the
USS Abraham Lincoln in the co-pilot's seat of an S-3B Viking jet.
Imagine the derisive merriment in the columns and on the chat shows if
former President Bill Clinton revived the skirt-chasing issue by
touring a sorority house or if Gore delivered a lecture to the
engineers at Netscape Communications Corp.
Think of the snickering and the sardonic rehash of history.
But for Bush in flyboy attire, a discreet silence.
The only voices I encountered raising this issue were David Corn in
the Nation; Newsday columnist Jimmy Breslin, who asked, "Tell me if
you ever heard of anybody with as powerful a resistance to shame as
Bush"; and talk station WLS-AM's token progressives Nancy Skinner and
Ski Anderson, who spent a full hour Sunday afternoon savoring the
irony of it all.
There was no relentless examination of the damning timeline on cable
news outlets, no interviewing the commanders who swear Bush didn't
show up where he was supposed to, no sit-downs with the veterans who
have offered still-unclaimed cash rewards to anyone who can prove that
Bush did anything at all in the Guard during his last months before
discharge.
So much for the cynical distortion that has become conventional wisdom
in many circles.
So much for the myth of the "liberal media."
________________________________________________________
"Liberal" media should be relabeled "Bush Propaganda Machine"
Harry
.

User: "gammajoe8"

Title: Re: Where's the so-called liberal media on Bush AWOL story? 22 Jul 2003 01:58:50 AM
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:ttejhvk5qurmdm8cd99ui0nrnq813ih3k0@4ax.com...


From The Chicago Tribune, 5/6/03:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/showcase/chi-0305060077may06.column


Media AWOL in noting irony of Bush's flight

CNN (the most Trusted name in news) probably called Bush and asked him if
it's true he was AWOL, and Bush denied it. So, that is where the story
went....
Regards,
Joe


By Eric Zorn

So much for that myth--the cynical distortion that has become
conventional wisdom in many circles.

During the presidential campaign of 2000, it started going around that
Texas Gov. George W. Bush, then the leading Republican candidate, had
significant gaps in his military record.

Specifically, that Bush failed to report for duty for an entire year
toward the end of his hitch with the Texas Air National Guard.

The short version:

In May 1968 the silver-spoon son of a U.S. congressman jumped to the
top of a long waiting list despite mediocre scores on his
pilot-aptitude test and was allowed to enlist in the Guard, a common
way to avoid being drafted into combat in Vietnam.

In May 1972 he sought a transfer from Houston, where he flew F-102s on
weekends, to a unit in Montgomery, Ala.

There, he worked on the U.S. Senate campaign of a friend of his
father's and, records indicate, blew off his military obligations.

Bush failed to take his annual flight physical in 1972 so Guard
officials grounded him, the story went.

He never flew again and received an early discharge to go to graduate
school.

His final officer-efficiency report from May 1973 noted only that
supervisors hadn't seen him or heard from him.

Bush's campaign biography obscured or misrepresented these details.

In the summer and fall of 2000, his spokesmen offered various and
evolving explanations for what Democrats said represented a far bigger
"character issue" than any of the windy exaggerations of their
candidate, Vice President Al Gore.

"If he is elected president, how will he be able to deal as commander
in chief with someone who goes AWOL, when he did the same thing?"
Nebraska Sen. Bob Kerrey said to the Boston Globe, where veteran
investigative reporter Walter V. Robinson, a former Army intelligence
officer, wrote several major stories on the subject.

"This stinks."

Yes, but like Bush at the end of his hitch, it didn't fly.

A search of all news publications and programs archived in the
LexisNexis database for the last seven months of the 2000 campaign
found 114 stories referencing Bush, the Texas Air National Guard and
Alabama.

Over that same span, nearly 10 times that many stories--1,076 to be
exact--referenced Al Gore and the expression "invented the internet,"
an allusion to the bogus charge then haunting Gore that he had wildly
inflated his role in the online revolution.

The "Bush AWOL?" story appeared in this newspaper and was based on
good reporting and still-unanswered questions.

It faded away--a scant 14 mentions in the database for all of 2001 and
2002 due to the age of the allegations, the lack of any new
developments and the urgency of current events.

Last week, though, the president all but wore a "Kick Me!" sticker on
the back of his flight suit when he decided to land on the deck of the
USS Abraham Lincoln in the co-pilot's seat of an S-3B Viking jet.

Imagine the derisive merriment in the columns and on the chat shows if
former President Bill Clinton revived the skirt-chasing issue by
touring a sorority house or if Gore delivered a lecture to the
engineers at Netscape Communications Corp.

Think of the snickering and the sardonic rehash of history.

But for Bush in flyboy attire, a discreet silence.

The only voices I encountered raising this issue were David Corn in
the Nation; Newsday columnist Jimmy Breslin, who asked, "Tell me if
you ever heard of anybody with as powerful a resistance to shame as
Bush"; and talk station WLS-AM's token progressives Nancy Skinner and
Ski Anderson, who spent a full hour Sunday afternoon savoring the
irony of it all.

There was no relentless examination of the damning timeline on cable
news outlets, no interviewing the commanders who swear Bush didn't
show up where he was supposed to, no sit-downs with the veterans who
have offered still-unclaimed cash rewards to anyone who can prove that
Bush did anything at all in the Guard during his last months before
discharge.

So much for the cynical distortion that has become conventional wisdom
in many circles.

So much for the myth of the "liberal media."

________________________________________________________

"Liberal" media should be relabeled "Bush Propaganda Machine"

Harry


.
User: "Gary S. Simon"

Title: Re: Where's the so-called liberal media on Bush AWOL story? 22 Jul 2003 06:25:57 AM
In article <Kg5Ta.16124$Mc.1212458@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>,
"gammajoe8" <elcam@earthlink.net> wrote:

"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:ttejhvk5qurmdm8cd99ui0nrnq813ih3k0@4ax.com...

From The Chicago Tribune, 5/6/03:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/showcase/chi-0305060077may06.column
Media AWOL in noting irony of Bush's flight


CNN (the most Trusted name in news) probably called Bush and asked him if
it's true he was AWOL, and Bush denied it. So, that is where the story
went....

Be fair to the press.
Some lackey probably followed up by asking how Shrub's faith helped
sustain him in the face of allegations that he was AWOL.
.

User: "Brian"

Title: Re: Where's the so-called liberal media on Bush AWOL story? 22 Jul 2003 03:54:56 PM
gammajoe8 wrote:

"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:ttejhvk5qurmdm8cd99ui0nrnq813ih3k0@4ax.com...


From The Chicago Tribune, 5/6/03:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/showcase/chi-0305060077may06.column


Media AWOL in noting irony of Bush's flight


CNN (the most Trusted name in news) probably called Bush and asked him if
it's true he was AWOL, and Bush denied it. So, that is where the story
went....

Or maybe they accepted the simple fact that he never went AWOL and decided
not to continue a proven lie.
.
User: "Brooks Gregory"

Title: Re: Where's the so-called liberal media on Bush AWOL story? 22 Jul 2003 06:43:41 PM
"Brian" <olinshooter@erols.com> wrote in message
news:3F1DA4A0.BCEB43A6@erols.com...



gammajoe8 wrote:

"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:ttejhvk5qurmdm8cd99ui0nrnq813ih3k0@4ax.com...


From The Chicago Tribune, 5/6/03:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/showcase/chi-0305060077may06.column


Media AWOL in noting irony of Bush's flight


CNN (the most Trusted name in news) probably called Bush and asked him

if

it's true he was AWOL, and Bush denied it. So, that is where the story
went....


Or maybe they accepted the simple fact that he never went AWOL and decided
not to continue a proven lie.


Or maybe they just understand that reservist do not get leave so they can't
be absent without it.
--
A lot of little boys never grow up.
They just change the name of
their game from "Cowboys and
Indians" to "Democrats and Republicans"
Brooks Gregory
www.campaignline.com
.
User: "Gary Forbis"

Title: Re: Where's the so-called liberal media on Bush AWOL story? 23 Jul 2003 07:20:49 AM
"Brooks Gregory" <brooks@swbtnet.com> wrote in message news:<GYjTa.427$R27.25@fe01.atl2.webusenet.com>...

"Brian" <olinshooter@erols.com> wrote in message
news:3F1DA4A0.BCEB43A6@erols.com...



gammajoe8 wrote:

"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:ttejhvk5qurmdm8cd99ui0nrnq813ih3k0@4ax.com...


From The Chicago Tribune, 5/6/03:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/showcase/chi-0305060077may06.column


Media AWOL in noting irony of Bush's flight


CNN (the most Trusted name in news) probably called Bush and asked him

if

it's true he was AWOL, and Bush denied it. So, that is where the story
went....


Or maybe they accepted the simple fact that he never went AWOL and decided
not to continue a proven lie.


Or maybe they just understand that reservist do not get leave so they can't
be absent without it.

Could you explain this a bit. Suppose that during a training exercise
a guy decides to go get a beer instead of man his post. Are you saying
there are no repercussions? Why wouldn't there be any to a guy who failed
to show up for duty? It seems like at a minimum it should have made him
avialable for the draft.
.
User: "Brooks Gregory"

Title: Re: Where's the so-called liberal media on Bush AWOL story? 23 Jul 2003 08:26:05 AM
"Gary Forbis" <forbisgaryg@msn.com> wrote in message
news:5a1238fe.0307230420.3f435e25@posting.google.com...

"Brooks Gregory" <brooks@swbtnet.com> wrote in message

news:<GYjTa.427$R27.25@fe01.atl2.webusenet.com>...

"Brian" <olinshooter@erols.com> wrote in message
news:3F1DA4A0.BCEB43A6@erols.com...



gammajoe8 wrote:

"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:ttejhvk5qurmdm8cd99ui0nrnq813ih3k0@4ax.com...


From The Chicago Tribune, 5/6/03:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/showcase/chi-0305060077may06.column



Media AWOL in noting irony of Bush's flight


CNN (the most Trusted name in news) probably called Bush and asked

him

if

it's true he was AWOL, and Bush denied it. So, that is where the

story

went....


Or maybe they accepted the simple fact that he never went AWOL and

decided

not to continue a proven lie.


Or maybe they just understand that reservist do not get leave so they

can't

be absent without it.


Could you explain this a bit. Suppose that during a training exercise
a guy decides to go get a beer instead of man his post. Are you saying
there are no repercussions? Why wouldn't there be any to a guy who failed
to show up for duty? It seems like at a minimum it should have made him
avialable for the draft.

Gosh, did I stutter? Reservists do not get leave. Reservists are volunteers.
They are not required to be anywhere at anytime unless they are called to
active duty. If they are given orders to report somewhere, not as an active
duty status, it is generally because they requested a transfer. And, do you
have any idea how that order can be rescinded? I bet not. In any event, not
being present for anything as a Reservist merely means you loose the
prescribed pay for that event.
So, AWOL stands for Absent Without Leave. If you can't have leave, how can
you be absent without it? Maybe that's why no Reservist has ever been
charged with AWOL when in inactive status. Funny how that works, huh?
--
A lot of little boys never grow up.
They just change the name of
their game from "Cowboys and
Indians" to "Democrats and Republicans"
Brooks Gregory
www.campaignline.com
.






  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER