White House circles the wagons



 Politics > Politics-USA > White House circles the wagons

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Harry Hope"
Date: 08 Jan 2006 06:10:44 PM
Object: White House circles the wagons
Bracing for the worst, Administration officials obtained from the
Secret Service a list of all the times Abramoff entered the White
House complex, and they scrambled to determine the reason for each
visit.
Bush aides are also trying to identify all the photos that may exist
of the two men together.
Abramoff attended Hanukkah and holiday events at the White House,
according to an aide who has seen the list.
Press secretary Scott McClellan said Abramoff might have attended
large gatherings with Bush but added, "The President does not know
him, nor does the President recall ever meeting him."
From the Jan. 16, 2006 issue of TIME magazine
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1147153,00.html
Never a Texas Two-Step
By MATTHEW COOPER, MIKE ALLEN
When legal and ethical questions began spinning around House majority
leader Tom DeLay last year, President George W. Bush was publicly
supportive.
Privately, though, he questioned his fellow Texan's mojo.
Bush had scored 10 points higher than DeLay in the Representative's
district in 2004, and that was only after Bush had recorded a
telephone message to help rally local Republicans.
"I can't believe I had to do robocalls for him," the President said
bitingly to an Oval Office visitor.
To people who know Bush well, the remark said it all about the
longtime chill between the two pols--a distance that is only sure to
grow with former lobbyist Jack Abramoff's guilty plea.
Both camps describe the two conservative Texan's relationship as
professional—an alliance, not a friendship.
"DeLay admires Bush's leadership but still thinks of himself as the
strongest conservative on the block," a DeLay friend says.
"They perceive DeLay as a bull in a china shop. They appreciate him as
their protector and retriever."
Like many of his colleagues on Capitol Hill, DeLay suffers under what
officials call this Administration's general lack of respect for
Congress.
But he is also in the unique position of being the most prominent
modern Republican politician in Texas to rise without the help of
White House senior adviser Karl Rove, and the two have never been
close.
"Karl thinks of him as someone a little bit too opinionated for his
own good," says an official close to both men.
"And DeLay thinks of Karl as a former mail vendor, not some great
guru."
Even before DeLay's announcement that he would abdicate his leadership
post, top Bush advisers tell TIME, the President's inner circle always
treated DeLay as a necessary burden.
He may have had an unmatched grip on the House and Washington
lobbyists, but DeLay is not the kind of guy--in background and
temperament--the President feels comfortable with.
Of the former exterminator, a Republican close to the President's
inner circle says, "They have always seen him as beneath them, more
blue collar. He's seen as a useful servant, not someone you would want
to vacation with."
During Bush's first run for the presidency, that uneasy relationship
was already on display.
Eager to establish himself as a compassionate conservative, Bush took
an oblique shot at DeLay while campaigning in California in 1999,
saying of House Republicans,
"I don't think they ought to balance their budget on the backs of the
poor."
DeLay never got a major speaking role at either of Bush's conventions.
Still, the White House has had no qualms about using him to advance
its agenda, and he has delivered.
Without DeLay's deftness as the Hammer, Bush could have lost battles
over the energy bill, the establishment of a new Medicare
prescription-drug benefit and the Central American Free Trade
Agreement.
But with the possibility that DeLay could be indicted in the Abramoff
case, the Administration fears that the scandal could tarnish all
Republicans and even hand the House to the Democrats.
"They're worried about the Congress," an adviser said after talking to
White House aides, "and they're worried about themselves."
Although DeLay's forfeiture of his leadership post makes things easier
for the White House, the Abramoff saga will continue to be a problem.
Bracing for the worst, Administration officials obtained from the
Secret Service a list of all the times Abramoff entered the White
House complex, and they scrambled to determine the reason for each
visit.
Bush aides are also trying to identify all the photos that may exist
of the two men together.
Abramoff attended Hanukkah and holiday events at the White House,
according to an aide who has seen the list.
Press secretary Scott McClellan said Abramoff might have attended
large gatherings with Bush but added, "The President does not know
him, nor does the President recall ever meeting him."
Republican officials say they are so worried about the Abramoff
problem that they are now inclined to stoke a fight with Democrats
over the confirmation of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court in an
effort to turn the page from the lobbying investigation.
Outside groups plan to spend heavily, and the White House will engage
in some tit for tat with Democrats as the hearings heat up.
In the end, Bush may be saved by the textured relationship he has long
had with well-heeled donors, who raised $300 million for his 2004
campaign, the most expensive one in the nation's history.
When the President is traveling, he does not like to have contributors
or local officials in his cars, planes or holding rooms unless they
are there for a good reason, and he sometimes questions his underlings
sharply if someone he considers extraneous is admitted.
To make sure that doesn't happen, chief of staff Andrew Card has set
up an elaborate vetting system that keeps people from sidling up to
the President to suggest or hand anything to him.
"They learned a lot from the previous Administration," says a Bush
friend intimately familiar with the staff protocols.
Abramoff was one of the Bush-Cheney re-election campaign's
"pioneers"--meaning he raised at least $100,000, most of it from
others, in increments of $2,000.
After Abramoff pleaded guilty, Bush aides announced they had donated
to the American Heart Association $6,000 that had been given to the
campaign by Abramoff, his wife and one of his Indian-tribe clients.
But Republican officials said they plan to keep the remaining $94,000.
A Bush aide said it cannot be assumed that the other donors, who were
simply recruited by Abramoff, have done anything wrong:
"That's not a fair standard."
Fair or not, the Bush Administration must now spend time and capital
trying to minimize collateral damage from people they have tried to
keep at a safe distance.
Fortunately for the White House, the President a year ago began
sending mixed signals about DeLay.
When conservative leaders held a $250-a-plate tribute dinner in April
to show solidarity with him, no one from the White House spoke.
But a few weeks earlier, when Bush spoke in Galveston, Texas, he went
out of his way to praise DeLay--then unindicted in Texas but under
fire--and even gave him a ride to Washington on his helicopter, Marine
One, and his jet, Air Force One.
In his remarks, Bush saluted DeLay's effectiveness, which no one could
dispute, but didn't bother to mention his character.
That was exactly the point.
____________________________________________________________
"I think it's clear we're in damage control now"
Norman Ornstein
Harry
.

User: "Billy"

Title: Re: White House circles the wagons 08 Jan 2006 07:57:44 PM
"
According to documents and tribal officials familiar with the Abramoff
team's methods, the lobbyists devised lengthy lists of lawmakers to whom the
tribes should donate and then delivered the lists to the tribes. The tribes,
in turn, wrote checks to the recommended campaign committees and in the
amounts the lobbyists prescribed. The money went to incumbents or selected
candidates in open seats.
Because of the makeup of his team and the composition of Congress, the
Abramoff lobbyists channeled most of their clients' giving to GOP
legislators, according to a review of public records. Sen. Conrad Burns
(R-Mont.), chairman of an Appropriations subcommittee that frequently deals
with Indian matters, received the largest amount from the tribes as well as
from the Greenberg Traurig lobbyists who helped direct those donations:
$141,590 from 1999 to 2004, the study showed.
But Rep. Patrick J. Kennedy (D-R.I.) ran second, with $128,000 in the same
period. From 1999 to 2001, Kennedy chaired the Democratic Congressional
Campaign Committee, which solicited campaign donations for House candidates.
The Indians' largess flowed to higher-ranking Democrats as well. Senate
Democratic leaders Reid and Daschle each received more than $40,000 from the
tribes and from lobbyists on Abramoff's team during the period. Gephardt got
$32,500.
Of the 18 largest recipients of tribe contributions directed by Abramoff's
group, six, or one-third, were Democrats. These included Sen. Patty Murray
(Wash.), who chaired the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee from 2001
to 2002, and Sen. Byron L. Dorgan (N.D.), a leader in Indian affairs
legislation.
Over that period, while Abramoff and his lobbyists directed nearly $4
million in funds from the tribes to lawmakers, they also gave from their own
pockets. Two-thirds of the total went to Republicans and one-third was
handed out to Democrats, according to The Post's calculations.
The six wealthiest tribes that had hired Abramoff's group were the
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla
Indians, the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe, the Chitimacha Tribe of
Louisiana, the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana and the Tigua Indian
Reservation.
Greenberg Traurig declined to comment. An Abramoff spokesman said: "Each
tribe has its own protocol for approving political contributions made by the
tribe. Mr. Abramoff and his team provided recommendations on where a tribe
should spend its political dollars, but ultimately the tribal council made
the final decision on what political contributions to make."
Democratic lawmakers sought to distance themselves from Abramoff.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: White House circles the wagons 08 Jan 2006 08:29:32 PM
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:57:44 -0800, "Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote:


"
According to documents and tribal officials familiar with the Abramoff
team's methods, the lobbyists devised lengthy lists of lawmakers to whom the
tribes should donate and then delivered the lists to the tribes. The tribes,
in turn, wrote checks to the recommended campaign committees and in the
amounts the lobbyists prescribed. The money went to incumbents or selected
candidates in open seats.

Because of the makeup of his team and the composition of Congress, the
Abramoff lobbyists channeled most of their clients' giving to GOP
legislators, according to a review of public records. Sen. Conrad Burns
(R-Mont.), chairman of an Appropriations subcommittee that frequently deals
with Indian matters, received the largest amount from the tribes as well as
from the Greenberg Traurig lobbyists who helped direct those donations:
$141,590 from 1999 to 2004, the study showed.

But Rep. Patrick J. Kennedy (D-R.I.) ran second, with $128,000 in the same
period. From 1999 to 2001, Kennedy chaired the Democratic Congressional
Campaign Committee, which solicited campaign donations for House candidates.

The Indians' largess flowed to higher-ranking Democrats as well. Senate
Democratic leaders Reid and Daschle each received more than $40,000 from the
tribes and from lobbyists on Abramoff's team during the period. Gephardt got
$32,500.

Of the 18 largest recipients of tribe contributions directed by Abramoff's
group, six, or one-third, were Democrats. These included Sen. Patty Murray
(Wash.), who chaired the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee from 2001
to 2002, and Sen. Byron L. Dorgan (N.D.), a leader in Indian affairs
legislation.

Over that period, while Abramoff and his lobbyists directed nearly $4
million in funds from the tribes to lawmakers, they also gave from their own
pockets. Two-thirds of the total went to Republicans and one-third was
handed out to Democrats, according to The Post's calculations.

The six wealthiest tribes that had hired Abramoff's group were the
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla
Indians, the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe, the Chitimacha Tribe of
Louisiana, the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana and the Tigua Indian
Reservation.

Greenberg Traurig declined to comment. An Abramoff spokesman said: "Each
tribe has its own protocol for approving political contributions made by the
tribe. Mr. Abramoff and his team provided recommendations on where a tribe
should spend its political dollars, but ultimately the tribal council made
the final decision on what political contributions to make."

Democratic lawmakers sought to distance themselves from Abramoff.

Interesting that there is no source for this material - Swift Boat
Veteran Liars maybe.
.
User: "Billy"

Title: Re: White House circles the wagons 08 Jan 2006 08:37:21 PM
<wbuck@airnews.net> wrote in message
news:3ji3s11m6aecaek0pqs3aiectslkohdd00@4ax.com...

On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:57:44 -0800, "Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote:


"
According to documents and tribal officials familiar with the Abramoff
team's methods, the lobbyists devised lengthy lists of lawmakers to whom
the
tribes should donate and then delivered the lists to the tribes. The
tribes,
in turn, wrote checks to the recommended campaign committees and in the
amounts the lobbyists prescribed. The money went to incumbents or selected
candidates in open seats.

Because of the makeup of his team and the composition of Congress, the
Abramoff lobbyists channeled most of their clients' giving to GOP
legislators, according to a review of public records. Sen. Conrad Burns
(R-Mont.), chairman of an Appropriations subcommittee that frequently
deals
with Indian matters, received the largest amount from the tribes as well
as
from the Greenberg Traurig lobbyists who helped direct those donations:
$141,590 from 1999 to 2004, the study showed.

But Rep. Patrick J. Kennedy (D-R.I.) ran second, with $128,000 in the same
period. From 1999 to 2001, Kennedy chaired the Democratic Congressional
Campaign Committee, which solicited campaign donations for House
candidates.

The Indians' largess flowed to higher-ranking Democrats as well. Senate
Democratic leaders Reid and Daschle each received more than $40,000 from
the
tribes and from lobbyists on Abramoff's team during the period. Gephardt
got
$32,500.

Of the 18 largest recipients of tribe contributions directed by Abramoff's
group, six, or one-third, were Democrats. These included Sen. Patty Murray
(Wash.), who chaired the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee from
2001
to 2002, and Sen. Byron L. Dorgan (N.D.), a leader in Indian affairs
legislation.

Over that period, while Abramoff and his lobbyists directed nearly $4
million in funds from the tribes to lawmakers, they also gave from their
own
pockets. Two-thirds of the total went to Republicans and one-third was
handed out to Democrats, according to The Post's calculations.

The six wealthiest tribes that had hired Abramoff's group were the
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla
Indians, the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe, the Chitimacha Tribe of
Louisiana, the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana and the Tigua Indian
Reservation.

Greenberg Traurig declined to comment. An Abramoff spokesman said: "Each
tribe has its own protocol for approving political contributions made by
the
tribe. Mr. Abramoff and his team provided recommendations on where a tribe
should spend its political dollars, but ultimately the tribal council made
the final decision on what political contributions to make."

Democratic lawmakers sought to distance themselves from Abramoff.



Interesting that there is no source for this material - Swift Boat
Veteran Liars maybe.

I didn't reliaze libears were too stupid to use google.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10451500/
http://www.indianz.com/News/2005/008535.asp
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2005/12/12/GR2005121200286.html
http://www.newkerala.com/news.php?action=fullnews&id=79143
.

User: "Tom Betz"

Title: Re: White House circles the wagons 08 Jan 2006 08:57:23 PM
Quoth
in news:3ji3s11m6aecaek0pqs3aiectslkohdd00@4ax.com:

Interesting that there is no source for this material - Swift Boat
Veteran Liars maybe.

No, its from an old Washington Post article that the VRWNM are
making an excessively big deal over.
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/02/AR2005060202158.html>
--
| "There's no telling what new harm Bush might |
| do if he ever gets back up off the mat. |
| You have to keep your knee on his windpipe |
| until the danger is past." -- Garry Trudeau |
| IMPEACH <http://gug.in/ywkyg> IMPEACH |
.



User: "Neo"

Title: Re: White House circles the wagons 09 Jan 2006 12:45:37 AM
Harry Hope wrote:


Bracing for the worst, Administration officials obtained from the
Secret Service a list of all the times Abramoff entered the White
House complex, and they scrambled to determine the reason for each
visit.

Bush aides are also trying to identify all the photos that may exist
of the two men together.

Abramoff attended Hanukkah and holiday events at the White House,
according to an aide who has seen the list.

Press secretary Scott McClellan said Abramoff might have attended
large gatherings with Bush but added, "The President does not know
him, nor does the President recall ever meeting him."



From the Jan. 16, 2006 issue of TIME magazine
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1147153,00.html

Never a Texas Two-Step

By MATTHEW COOPER, MIKE ALLEN


When legal and ethical questions began spinning around House majority
leader Tom DeLay last year, President George W. Bush was publicly
supportive.

Privately, though, he questioned his fellow Texan's mojo.

Bush had scored 10 points higher than DeLay in the Representative's
district in 2004, and that was only after Bush had recorded a
telephone message to help rally local Republicans.

"I can't believe I had to do robocalls for him," the President said
bitingly to an Oval Office visitor.

To people who know Bush well, the remark said it all about the
longtime chill between the two pols--a distance that is only sure to
grow with former lobbyist Jack Abramoff's guilty plea.

Both camps describe the two conservative Texan's relationship as
professional—an alliance, not a friendship.

"DeLay admires Bush's leadership but still thinks of himself as the
strongest conservative on the block," a DeLay friend says.

"They perceive DeLay as a bull in a china shop. They appreciate him as
their protector and retriever."

Like many of his colleagues on Capitol Hill, DeLay suffers under what
officials call this Administration's general lack of respect for
Congress.

But he is also in the unique position of being the most prominent
modern Republican politician in Texas to rise without the help of
White House senior adviser Karl Rove, and the two have never been
close.

"Karl thinks of him as someone a little bit too opinionated for his
own good," says an official close to both men.

"And DeLay thinks of Karl as a former mail vendor, not some great
guru."

Even before DeLay's announcement that he would abdicate his leadership
post, top Bush advisers tell TIME, the President's inner circle always
treated DeLay as a necessary burden.

He may have had an unmatched grip on the House and Washington
lobbyists, but DeLay is not the kind of guy--in background and
temperament--the President feels comfortable with.

Of the former exterminator, a Republican close to the President's
inner circle says, "They have always seen him as beneath them, more
blue collar. He's seen as a useful servant, not someone you would want
to vacation with."

During Bush's first run for the presidency, that uneasy relationship
was already on display.

Eager to establish himself as a compassionate conservative, Bush took
an oblique shot at DeLay while campaigning in California in 1999,
saying of House Republicans,

"I don't think they ought to balance their budget on the backs of the
poor."

DeLay never got a major speaking role at either of Bush's conventions.

Still, the White House has had no qualms about using him to advance
its agenda, and he has delivered.

Without DeLay's deftness as the Hammer, Bush could have lost battles
over the energy bill, the establishment of a new Medicare
prescription-drug benefit and the Central American Free Trade
Agreement.

But with the possibility that DeLay could be indicted in the Abramoff
case, the Administration fears that the scandal could tarnish all
Republicans and even hand the House to the Democrats.

"They're worried about the Congress," an adviser said after talking to
White House aides, "and they're worried about themselves."

Although DeLay's forfeiture of his leadership post makes things easier
for the White House, the Abramoff saga will continue to be a problem.

Bracing for the worst, Administration officials obtained from the
Secret Service a list of all the times Abramoff entered the White
House complex, and they scrambled to determine the reason for each
visit.

Bush aides are also trying to identify all the photos that may exist
of the two men together.

Abramoff attended Hanukkah and holiday events at the White House,
according to an aide who has seen the list.

Press secretary Scott McClellan said Abramoff might have attended
large gatherings with Bush but added, "The President does not know
him, nor does the President recall ever meeting him."

Republican officials say they are so worried about the Abramoff
problem that they are now inclined to stoke a fight with Democrats
over the confirmation of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court in an
effort to turn the page from the lobbying investigation.

Outside groups plan to spend heavily, and the White House will engage
in some tit for tat with Democrats as the hearings heat up.

In the end, Bush may be saved by the textured relationship he has long
had with well-heeled donors, who raised $300 million for his 2004
campaign, the most expensive one in the nation's history.

When the President is traveling, he does not like to have contributors
or local officials in his cars, planes or holding rooms unless they
are there for a good reason, and he sometimes questions his underlings
sharply if someone he considers extraneous is admitted.

To make sure that doesn't happen, chief of staff Andrew Card has set
up an elaborate vetting system that keeps people from sidling up to
the President to suggest or hand anything to him.

"They learned a lot from the previous Administration," says a Bush
friend intimately familiar with the staff protocols.

Abramoff was one of the Bush-Cheney re-election campaign's
"pioneers"--meaning he raised at least $100,000, most of it from
others, in increments of $2,000.

After Abramoff pleaded guilty, Bush aides announced they had donated
to the American Heart Association $6,000 that had been given to the
campaign by Abramoff, his wife and one of his Indian-tribe clients.

But Republican officials said they plan to keep the remaining $94,000.

A Bush aide said it cannot be assumed that the other donors, who were
simply recruited by Abramoff, have done anything wrong:

"That's not a fair standard."

Fair or not, the Bush Administration must now spend time and capital
trying to minimize collateral damage from people they have tried to
keep at a safe distance.

Fortunately for the White House, the President a year ago began
sending mixed signals about DeLay.

When conservative leaders held a $250-a-plate tribute dinner in April
to show solidarity with him, no one from the White House spoke.

But a few weeks earlier, when Bush spoke in Galveston, Texas, he went
out of his way to praise DeLay--then unindicted in Texas but under
fire--and even gave him a ride to Washington on his helicopter, Marine
One, and his jet, Air Force One.

In his remarks, Bush saluted DeLay's effectiveness, which no one could
dispute, but didn't bother to mention his character.

That was exactly the point.

____________________________________________________________

"I think it's clear we're in damage control now"

Norman Ornstein

Harry

bush is the big, fat, hairy, congressional military industrial complex turd
and delay is the afterwipe.
.

User: "Miles Long"

Title: Re: White House circles the wagons 08 Jan 2006 06:42:35 PM
Harry Hope wrote:

Bracing for the worst, Administration officials obtained from the
Secret Service a list of all the times Abramoff entered the White
House complex, and they scrambled to determine the reason for each
visit.

Bush aides are also trying to identify all the photos that may exist
of the two men together.

Abramoff attended Hanukkah and holiday events at the White House,
according to an aide who has seen the list.

Press secretary Scott McClellan said Abramoff might have attended
large gatherings with Bush but added, "The President does not know
him, nor does the President recall ever meeting him."



From the Jan. 16, 2006 issue of TIME magazine
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1147153,00.html

Never a Texas Two-Step

By MATTHEW COOPER, MIKE ALLEN


When legal and ethical questions began spinning around House majority
leader Tom DeLay last year, President George W. Bush was publicly
supportive.

Privately, though, he questioned his fellow Texan's mojo.

Bush had scored 10 points higher than DeLay in the Representative's
district in 2004, and that was only after Bush had recorded a
telephone message to help rally local Republicans.

"I can't believe I had to do robocalls for him," the President said
bitingly to an Oval Office visitor.

To people who know Bush well, the remark said it all about the
longtime chill between the two pols--a distance that is only sure to
grow with former lobbyist Jack Abramoff's guilty plea.

Both camps describe the two conservative Texan's relationship as
professional—an alliance, not a friendship.

"DeLay admires Bush's leadership but still thinks of himself as the
strongest conservative on the block," a DeLay friend says.

"They perceive DeLay as a bull in a china shop. They appreciate him as
their protector and retriever."

Like many of his colleagues on Capitol Hill, DeLay suffers under what
officials call this Administration's general lack of respect for
Congress.

But he is also in the unique position of being the most prominent
modern Republican politician in Texas to rise without the help of
White House senior adviser Karl Rove, and the two have never been
close.

"Karl thinks of him as someone a little bit too opinionated for his
own good," says an official close to both men.

"And DeLay thinks of Karl as a former mail vendor, not some great
guru."

Even before DeLay's announcement that he would abdicate his leadership
post, top Bush advisers tell TIME, the President's inner circle always
treated DeLay as a necessary burden.

He may have had an unmatched grip on the House and Washington
lobbyists, but DeLay is not the kind of guy--in background and
temperament--the President feels comfortable with.

Of the former exterminator, a Republican close to the President's
inner circle says, "They have always seen him as beneath them, more
blue collar. He's seen as a useful servant, not someone you would want
to vacation with."

During Bush's first run for the presidency, that uneasy relationship
was already on display.

Eager to establish himself as a compassionate conservative, Bush took
an oblique shot at DeLay while campaigning in California in 1999,
saying of House Republicans,

"I don't think they ought to balance their budget on the backs of the
poor."

DeLay never got a major speaking role at either of Bush's conventions.

Still, the White House has had no qualms about using him to advance
its agenda, and he has delivered.

Without DeLay's deftness as the Hammer, Bush could have lost battles
over the energy bill, the establishment of a new Medicare
prescription-drug benefit and the Central American Free Trade
Agreement.

But with the possibility that DeLay could be indicted in the Abramoff
case, the Administration fears that the scandal could tarnish all
Republicans and even hand the House to the Democrats.

"They're worried about the Congress," an adviser said after talking to
White House aides, "and they're worried about themselves."

Although DeLay's forfeiture of his leadership post makes things easier
for the White House, the Abramoff saga will continue to be a problem.

Bracing for the worst, Administration officials obtained from the
Secret Service a list of all the times Abramoff entered the White
House complex, and they scrambled to determine the reason for each
visit.

Bush aides are also trying to identify all the photos that may exist
of the two men together.

Abramoff attended Hanukkah and holiday events at the White House,
according to an aide who has seen the list.

Press secretary Scott McClellan said Abramoff might have attended
large gatherings with Bush but added, "The President does not know
him, nor does the President recall ever meeting him."

Republican officials say they are so worried about the Abramoff
problem that they are now inclined to stoke a fight with Democrats
over the confirmation of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court in an
effort to turn the page from the lobbying investigation.

Outside groups plan to spend heavily, and the White House will engage
in some tit for tat with Democrats as the hearings heat up.

In the end, Bush may be saved by the textured relationship he has long
had with well-heeled donors, who raised $300 million for his 2004
campaign, the most expensive one in the nation's history.

When the President is traveling, he does not like to have contributors
or local officials in his cars, planes or holding rooms unless they
are there for a good reason, and he sometimes questions his underlings
sharply if someone he considers extraneous is admitted.

To make sure that doesn't happen, chief of staff Andrew Card has set
up an elaborate vetting system that keeps people from sidling up to
the President to suggest or hand anything to him.

"They learned a lot from the previous Administration," says a Bush
friend intimately familiar with the staff protocols.

Abramoff was one of the Bush-Cheney re-election campaign's
"pioneers"--meaning he raised at least $100,000, most of it from
others, in increments of $2,000.

After Abramoff pleaded guilty, Bush aides announced they had donated
to the American Heart Association $6,000 that had been given to the
campaign by Abramoff, his wife and one of his Indian-tribe clients.

But Republican officials said they plan to keep the remaining $94,000.

A Bush aide said it cannot be assumed that the other donors, who were
simply recruited by Abramoff, have done anything wrong:

"That's not a fair standard."

Fair or not, the Bush Administration must now spend time and capital
trying to minimize collateral damage from people they have tried to
keep at a safe distance.

Fortunately for the White House, the President a year ago began
sending mixed signals about DeLay.

When conservative leaders held a $250-a-plate tribute dinner in April
to show solidarity with him, no one from the White House spoke.

But a few weeks earlier, when Bush spoke in Galveston, Texas, he went
out of his way to praise DeLay--then unindicted in Texas but under
fire--and even gave him a ride to Washington on his helicopter, Marine
One, and his jet, Air Force One.

In his remarks, Bush saluted DeLay's effectiveness, which no one could
dispute, but didn't bother to mention his character.

That was exactly the point.

____________________________________________________________

"I think it's clear we're in damage control now"

Norman Ornstein

Harry

In case any of you have forgotten, missed my earlier post, or just
didn't know...Abramoff was on the Bush transition team in 2000/2001.
That was a team of 45 people...do ya really think the two never met?
<falling off my chair howling>
Miles "<singing>Me...and my shadow..." Long
.
User: "Here come da FROGMARCH!"

Title: Re: White House circles the wagons 09 Jan 2006 05:24:36 AM

In case any of you have forgotten, missed my earlier post, or just
didn't know...Abramoff was on the Bush transition team in 2000/2001.
That was a team of 45 people...do ya really think the two never met?
<falling off my chair howling>

Not only did I read it in your other post, but I've now read it again, and the
more I read it the more joy and chair-falling-out-of-laughing happens here as
well.
.


User: "Gosh Darnit Dude"

Title: Re: White House circles the wagons 08 Jan 2006 10:00:57 PM
I will just repeat the following quote:
I never speak against the commander-in-chief - therefore I won't
H Schnauber 1978
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Bush White House circles the wagons on Cheney aide disclosure
Bush White House circles the wagons
Miers Steps Down As Republican White House Circles the Wagons
Bush White House wagons make bigger circles
Frightened Right Wing Media Circles Wagons Around America-Hater Chickenhawk Limbaugh.
Bush Circles Wagons
Bush circles the wagons to defend against AWOL charges
Re: LET THE IMPEACHMENT BEGIN!... the vulnerable underbelly of the Bush Crime Family is now exposed and unprotected...there are "No wagons left to circle the all hat and no cattle" Bush Crime Family
Re: LET THE IMPEACHMENT BEGIN!... the vulnerable underbelly of the Bush Crime Family is now exposed and unprotected...there are "No wagons left to circle the all hat and no cattle" Bush Crime Family
Criminal right-wingers circle the wagons
***** Limbaugh: Conservatives Should ‘Circle The Wagons’ Around ‘Idiot,’ ‘Weak Attorney General’
Patriot Clarke forces traitor Bush to circle the wagons.
Embarrassed, Frightened DIM Lawmakers Circle the wagons to Win at any Cost
EXIM BANK and Crop Circles in Wolf Trap/Vienna, VA [Tysons Corner]
In a Military Stronghold, a War Hawk Circles Back
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER