There seems to be significant disagreements about the Great Bay Casino
case in which van Reiman and his associates were involved.
On the one hand there appears to be everybody in the world but van
Reiman. On the other hand, there's van Reiman seemingly claiming that
everybody else lies about what the Judge(s) found..
In order to check the facts you can check the original findings.
The courts' findings in the two cases are and can be located, I
believe, at:
Doug Grant Inc. et al, Plantiffs, v. Great Bay Casino Corporation et
al, Defendants
Civil Action No. 97-4291 (JEI)
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
1998 U.S. Dist. Lexis 6479
May 1, 1998, Original Filed
http://members.aol.com/rustyblkjk/doogie.htm
Doug Grant Inc. et al, Plantiffs, v. Great Bay Casino Corporation et
al, Defendants
No. 98-5291
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
November 2, 2000, Original Filed
October 5, 2000, Argued
http://laws.lp.findlaw.com/3rd/985291.html
Now I suppose one must add "insofar as these transcripts are
accurate." Theoretically, I suppose, the administrators at FindLaw
might be secret agents of the Democratic Party member (as the Grants
seem to believe) Osama Bin Laden. The seeming conservatives at FindLaw
might be real liberal agents of the liberal (as the Grants seem to
believe) Osama Bin Laden. Theoretically, I suppose, the administrators
of FindLaw might have invented a hostile court finding for the sole
purpose of embarassing van Reiman.
But I kind of doubt it.
But I would not be surprised if the Doug Grants claimed those things.
I also would not be surprised if the Grants continue in their way to
continue to create the very Serbonian bog that the court originally
claimed they did.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
.
|
