Who's speaking for the majority? Not the rightards.



 Politics > Politics-USA > Who's speaking for the majority? Not the rightards.

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "*Harry Hope"
Date: 30 Aug 2005 12:30:04 PM
Object: Who's speaking for the majority? Not the rightards.
The president's approval rating is 36 percent.
That's as bad as any president has ever had.
Except for Nixon, no president at this point in his second term has
been less than 50 percent.
I recently came across the following commentary on the president's 36
percent approval rating that I found amusing, or scary, depending on
how you look at it:
"Those are pre-coup numbers," the pundit wrote.
"That's when a politician in a third world county becomes so unpopular
that a couple of generals decide to show him the door. Nixon at the
height of Watergate was at 39 percent, three points higher than Bush
is right now. And people despised Nixon.
"To say ‘people like Bush' under these circumstances is to be so
inaccurate that I have to question either your intelligence or your
motives. How much cognitive reasoning ability do you need to figure
out that 36 percent approval rating means people don't like George
Bush."
From The Suffolk News Herald, 8/30/05:
http://www.suffolknewsherald.com/articles/2005/08/30/virtual_suffolk_-_editors_blog/blog966.txt
Who's speaking for the majority? Aug. 28, 2005
By Andy Prutsok
George Bush's most vocal supporter in Suffolk, Chuck Fisher, had
another missive in the News-Herald Sunday blasting me and the
News-Herald, mostly me, over what he sees as a somewhat anti George
Bush tilt in opinion pieces written by me.
Mr. Fisher's implication is that I'm somehow unpatriotic and out of
step with public opinion.
Obviously, Mr. Fisher has not turned on his television for a couple
months.
The president's approval rating is 36 percent.
That's as bad as any president has ever had.
Except for Nixon, no president at this point in his second term has
been less than 50 percent.
I recently came across the following commentary on the president's 36
percent approval rating that I found amusing, or scary, depending on
how you look at it:
"Those are pre-coup numbers," the pundit wrote. "That's when a
politician in a third world county becomes so unpopular that a couple
of generals decide to show him the door. Nixon at the height of
Watergate was at 39 percent, three points higher than Bush is right
now. And people despised Nixon.
"To say ‘people like Bush' under these circumstances is to be so
inaccurate that I have to question either your intelligence or your
motives. How much cognitive reasoning ability do you need to figure
out that 36 percent approval rating means people don't like George
Bush."
That about sums it up.
I'll leave Mr. Fisher to come to his own conclusions, but I think I'm
in pretty good company.
It's not so much, really, that I hate President Bush.
I don't.
In fact, as an American, I need and desperately want President Bush to
be successful.
I have a son who will soon be of military service age and I'm also in
a big mortgage.
I want us to win in Iraq (whatever winning is) and for the housing
market to continue to blaze, but I have my doubts that either will.
Nonetheless, I believe he has mismanaged the Iraq war and has done
more to undermine the freedom and security of the United States than
anything a terrorist could have done.
Apparently a lot of other Americans think so, too.
Mr. Fisher even goes beyond his normal Prutsok bashing in this piece
to take jabs at Cindy Sheehan, the woman who's son was killed in Iraq
and whose individual protest has single-handedly brought the
president's poll numbers to the dismal point they are at now.
If I'm correct, he implies that she is a socialist and other such
nonsense which has no bearing on the fact that her son was killed in
Iraq and she would simply like to know why.
What Mr. Fisher and the shrill minority (36 percent) seem to forget is
that in America, we n the 64 percent of us who disappove of the job
the president is doing, have a right to that opinion and to express it
in both newspaper articles and by camping out at the gate of the
president's ranch.
That's what America is about.
I'm not sure what the America is that Mr. Fisher envisions --
apparently one where citizens are duty-bound to slime anyone who has
an opinion on an issue that differs from Sean Hannity's and Rush
Limbaugh's, but I don't think I want to live there.
__________________________________________________________
Andy Prutsok, ladies and gentlemen.
Harry
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Rightards respond to some good old arm-twisting by Democrats
Video of rightards
MESSAGE TO RIGHTARDS: YOU'RE *OUT* OF POWER! GET USED TO IT! IT'LL BE THAT WAY FOR A LONG TIME!
=======> WOW, 2007 IS GOING TO BE *GREAT* FOR LIBERALS! IT'S REALLY AMUSING TO KNOW THAT RIGHTARDS ARE PI$$ING THEMSELVES IN FEAR OF COMING CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT HEARINGS! <=======
Our wounded troops are getting pissed on by rightards.
Hey, rightards, why are you helping Iran get a nuclear bomb?
BU$H STOPS ILLEGAL WIRETAPS; HOUSE CUTS OIL SUBSIDIES; LISTEN TO GREEDY RIGHTARDS SQUEAL!
Rightards want Bush to emphasize leaving Iraq to give themselves cover.
Lying Repug admitted author of memo rightards were whining "SETUP" about
NO MORE "DIALOG'" WITH RIGHTARDS! THEY LIKE WARS?! GIVE 'EM HELL!!!!!!!
Rightards shriek about Starbrucks cups. They'll whine about anything.
HELLO, I'M A LIBERAL AND HERE'S MY LINK TO PROVE YOU RIGHTARDS ARE WRONG
Fascist Rightards Subvert Democracy With the Big Lie
Rejoice, folks, rightards are giving energy companies $88.9 billion welfare
But fellow rightards; HOW CAN THIS BE?? Massive swing to the left in Australian election.
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER