Why did oil industry lie about secret meetings with Cheney?



 Politics > Politics-USA > Why did oil industry lie about secret meetings with Cheney?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Harry Hope"
Date: 16 Nov 2005 08:40:31 AM
Object: Why did oil industry lie about secret meetings with Cheney?
From The Washington Post, 11/16/05:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/15/AR2005111501842.html
Document Says Oil Chiefs Met With Cheney Task Force
By Dana Milbank and Justin Blum
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, November 16, 2005; Page A01
A White House document shows that executives from big oil companies
met with Vice President Cheney's energy task force in 2001 --
something long suspected by environmentalists but denied as recently
as last week by industry officials testifying before Congress.
The document, obtained this week by The Washington Post, shows that
officials from Exxon Mobil Corp., Conoco (before its merger with
Phillips), Shell Oil Co. and BP America Inc. met in the White House
complex with the Cheney aides who were developing a national energy
policy, parts of which became law and parts of which are still being
debated.

In a joint hearing last week of the Senate Energy and Commerce
committees, the chief executives of Exxon Mobil Corp., Chevron Corp.
and ConocoPhillips said their firms did not participate in the 2001
task force.
The president of Shell Oil said his company did not participate "to my
knowledge," and the chief of BP America Inc. said he did not know.
Chevron was not named in the White House document, but the Government
Accountability Office has found that Chevron was one of several
companies that "gave detailed energy policy recommendations" to the
task force.
In addition, Cheney had a separate meeting with John Browne, BP's
chief executive, according to a person familiar with the task force's
work; that meeting is not noted in the document.
The task force's activities attracted complaints from
environmentalists, who said they were shut out of the task force
discussions while corporate interests were present.
The meetings were held in secret and the White House refused to
release a list of participants.
The task force was made up primarily of Cabinet-level officials.
Judicial Watch and the Sierra Club unsuccessfully sued to obtain the
records.
Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.), who posed the question about the task
force, said he will ask the Justice Department today to investigate.
"The White House went to great lengths to keep these meetings secret,
and now oil executives may be lying to Congress about their role in
the Cheney task force," Lautenberg said.
Lea Anne McBride, a spokeswoman for Cheney, declined to comment on the
document.
She said that the courts have upheld "the constitutional right of the
president and vice president to obtain information in
confidentiality."
The executives were not under oath when they testified, so they are
not vulnerable to charges of perjury; committee Democrats had
protested the decision by Commerce Chairman Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) not
to swear in the executives.
But a person can be fined or imprisoned for up to five years for
making "any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or
representation" to Congress.
Alan Huffman, who was a Conoco manager until the 2002 merger with
Phillips, confirmed meeting with the task force staff.
"We met in the Executive Office Building, if I remember correctly," he
said.
A spokesman for ConocoPhillips said the chief executive, James J.
Mulva, had been unaware that Conoco officials met with task force
staff when he testified at the hearing.
The spokesman said that Mulva was chief executive of Phillips in 2001
before the merger and that nobody from Phillips met with the task
force.
Exxon spokesman Russ Roberts said the company stood by chief executive
Lee R. Raymond's statement in the hearing.
In a brief phone interview, former Exxon vice president James Rouse,
the official named in the White House document, denied the meeting
took place.
"That must be inaccurate and I don't have any comment beyond that,"
said Rouse, now retired.
Ronnie Chappell, a spokesman for BP, declined to comment on the task
force meetings.
Darci Sinclair, a spokeswoman for Shell, said she did not know whether
Shell officials met with the task force, but they often meet members
of the administration.
Chevron said its executives did not meet with the task force but
confirmed that it sent President Bush recommendations in a letter.
The person familiar with the task force's work, who requested
anonymity out of concern about retribution, said the document was
based on records kept by the Secret Service of people admitted to the
White House complex.
This person said most meetings were with Andrew Lundquist, the task
force's executive director, and Cheney aide Karen Y. Knutson.
According to the White House document, Rouse met with task force staff
members on Feb. 14, 2001.
On March 21, they met with Archie Dunham, who was chairman of Conoco.
On April 12, according to the document, task force staff members met
with Conoco official Huffman and two officials from the U.S. Oil and
Gas Association, Wayne Gibbens and Alby Modiano.
On April 17, task force staff members met with Royal Dutch/Shell
Group's chairman, Sir Mark Moody-Stuart, Shell Oil chairman Steven
Miller and two others.
On March 22, staff members met with BP regional president Bob Malone,
chief economist Peter Davies and company employees Graham Barr and Deb
Beaubien.
Toward the end of the hearing, Lautenberg asked the five executives:
"Did your company or any representatives of your companies participate
in Vice President Cheney's energy task force in 2001?"
When there was no response, Lautenberg added:
"The meeting . . . "
"No," said Raymond.
"No," said Chevron Chairman David J. O'Reilly.
"We did not, no," Mulva said.
"To be honest, I don't know," said BP America chief executive Ross
Pillari, who came to the job in August 2001.
"I wasn't here then."
"But your company was here," Lautenberg replied.
"Yes," Pillari said.
Shell Oil president John Hofmeister, who has held his job since
earlier this year, answered last.
"Not to my knowledge," he said.
________________________________________________________
Now why would they wanna lie about a think like that (rhetorical
question)
Harry
.

User: "Austrodamous Jones"

Title: Re: Why did oil industry lie about secret meetings with Cheney? 16 Nov 2005 07:49:36 PM
Because they new they were not under oath.
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:27hmn1t4t891je3033ke5677b9ggsiarqg@4ax.com...


From The Washington Post, 11/16/05:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/15/AR2005111501842.html


Document Says Oil Chiefs Met With Cheney Task Force

By Dana Milbank and Justin Blum
Washington Post Staff Writers

Wednesday, November 16, 2005; Page A01

A White House document shows that executives from big oil companies
met with Vice President Cheney's energy task force in 2001 --
something long suspected by environmentalists but denied as recently
as last week by industry officials testifying before Congress.

The document, obtained this week by The Washington Post, shows that
officials from Exxon Mobil Corp., Conoco (before its merger with
Phillips), Shell Oil Co. and BP America Inc. met in the White House
complex with the Cheney aides who were developing a national energy
policy, parts of which became law and parts of which are still being
debated.

In a joint hearing last week of the Senate Energy and Commerce
committees, the chief executives of Exxon Mobil Corp., Chevron Corp.
and ConocoPhillips said their firms did not participate in the 2001
task force.

The president of Shell Oil said his company did not participate "to my
knowledge," and the chief of BP America Inc. said he did not know.

Chevron was not named in the White House document, but the Government
Accountability Office has found that Chevron was one of several
companies that "gave detailed energy policy recommendations" to the
task force.

In addition, Cheney had a separate meeting with John Browne, BP's
chief executive, according to a person familiar with the task force's
work; that meeting is not noted in the document.

The task force's activities attracted complaints from
environmentalists, who said they were shut out of the task force
discussions while corporate interests were present.

The meetings were held in secret and the White House refused to
release a list of participants.

The task force was made up primarily of Cabinet-level officials.
Judicial Watch and the Sierra Club unsuccessfully sued to obtain the
records.

Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.), who posed the question about the task
force, said he will ask the Justice Department today to investigate.

"The White House went to great lengths to keep these meetings secret,
and now oil executives may be lying to Congress about their role in
the Cheney task force," Lautenberg said.

Lea Anne McBride, a spokeswoman for Cheney, declined to comment on the
document.

She said that the courts have upheld "the constitutional right of the
president and vice president to obtain information in
confidentiality."

The executives were not under oath when they testified, so they are
not vulnerable to charges of perjury; committee Democrats had
protested the decision by Commerce Chairman Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) not
to swear in the executives.

But a person can be fined or imprisoned for up to five years for
making "any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or
representation" to Congress.

Alan Huffman, who was a Conoco manager until the 2002 merger with
Phillips, confirmed meeting with the task force staff.

"We met in the Executive Office Building, if I remember correctly," he
said.

A spokesman for ConocoPhillips said the chief executive, James J.
Mulva, had been unaware that Conoco officials met with task force
staff when he testified at the hearing.

The spokesman said that Mulva was chief executive of Phillips in 2001
before the merger and that nobody from Phillips met with the task
force.

Exxon spokesman Russ Roberts said the company stood by chief executive
Lee R. Raymond's statement in the hearing.

In a brief phone interview, former Exxon vice president James Rouse,
the official named in the White House document, denied the meeting
took place.

"That must be inaccurate and I don't have any comment beyond that,"
said Rouse, now retired.

Ronnie Chappell, a spokesman for BP, declined to comment on the task
force meetings.

Darci Sinclair, a spokeswoman for Shell, said she did not know whether
Shell officials met with the task force, but they often meet members
of the administration.

Chevron said its executives did not meet with the task force but
confirmed that it sent President Bush recommendations in a letter.

The person familiar with the task force's work, who requested
anonymity out of concern about retribution, said the document was
based on records kept by the Secret Service of people admitted to the
White House complex.

This person said most meetings were with Andrew Lundquist, the task
force's executive director, and Cheney aide Karen Y. Knutson.

According to the White House document, Rouse met with task force staff
members on Feb. 14, 2001.

On March 21, they met with Archie Dunham, who was chairman of Conoco.

On April 12, according to the document, task force staff members met
with Conoco official Huffman and two officials from the U.S. Oil and
Gas Association, Wayne Gibbens and Alby Modiano.

On April 17, task force staff members met with Royal Dutch/Shell
Group's chairman, Sir Mark Moody-Stuart, Shell Oil chairman Steven
Miller and two others.

On March 22, staff members met with BP regional president Bob Malone,
chief economist Peter Davies and company employees Graham Barr and Deb
Beaubien.

Toward the end of the hearing, Lautenberg asked the five executives:

"Did your company or any representatives of your companies participate
in Vice President Cheney's energy task force in 2001?"

When there was no response, Lautenberg added:

"The meeting . . . "

"No," said Raymond.

"No," said Chevron Chairman David J. O'Reilly.

"We did not, no," Mulva said.

"To be honest, I don't know," said BP America chief executive Ross
Pillari, who came to the job in August 2001.

"I wasn't here then."

"But your company was here," Lautenberg replied.

"Yes," Pillari said.

Shell Oil president John Hofmeister, who has held his job since
earlier this year, answered last.

"Not to my knowledge," he said.

________________________________________________________

Now why would they wanna lie about a think like that (rhetorical
question)

Harry

.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
The Man The Race Industry Hates
Insurance industry fights reform of ghoulish " dead peasants" policies
Slick Willie Frist's loyalty is to the health care industry, not patients
Bush's Medicare chief joins firm with health industry clients. Nice, eh?
Bush Pays Back Drug Industry By Misleading Seniors.
Re: Bush's Ties To Oil Industry Are Hurting Consumers On Gas Prices
Photo-op Giuliani becomes hired gun for money-hungry drug industry
$1.5 billion corporate welfare. Bush has taxpayers finance the timber industry.
Bush energy bill passes. Energy industry breaks out the champagne.
USA's Fear Industry is Booming (DerSpiegel)
High Gas Prices Result of Industry Profits
Sheehan Industry's Radical Bay Area Puppeteers
Washington Post: $1.46 on each gallon sold is new profit for oil industry
CCRKBA ACTION ALERT: Stop Frivolous Lawsuits Against Firearms Industry
Musicians out profit oil industry
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER