Politics > Politics-USA > Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted.
| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Hope" |
| Date: |
02 Jul 2006 02:31:30 PM |
| Object: |
Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-young/why-does-hannity-continue_b_24230.html
Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum
Must Be Prosecuted
By Steve Young
I nearly swerved into a ditch last week when Sean Hannity brought on
Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA) and Congressman Peter Hoekstra (R-MI) to
leak a classified report revealing that we had actually found weapons
of mass destruction in Iraq.
Why didn't they just stick a white flag in the back of everyone of our
fighting men in harm's way?
Hannity might as well have said that it's okay for seven guys with no
wherewithal nor weapons to blow up the Sears Tower.
Fox News's decision to run a story about classified government
information revealing our discovery of WMD only supplies terrorists
with national security information giving them a heads up that can
only undermine the war effort, endangering our troops while they are
in harm's way.
It seems that Hannity and the leakers, Santorum and Hoekstra, feel
that TV/radio ratings and getting elected is more important than the
safety of our fighting men and the protection of our borders.
Don't they realize that we are in a post 9/11 world with a post 9/11
mentality and a post 9/11 fear of everything?
Some say the terrorists aren't stupid and they already knew that we
are looking for WMD.
Does that makes it okay that we reveal the fact that we are have in
fact found WMD?
Terrorists now know specifically where we have looked and conceivably,
where we will continue to look.
With Hannity's treasonous behavior, terrorists can conceivably move
the WMD from places they are conceivably hiding them to many more
conceivable locations where they might use them against our fighting
men.
Conceivably, those same hidden WMD can be delivered to those intent on
attacking America on our own land...conceivably.
Are we going to give Hannity a Pulitzer Prize because this is proper
media oversight?
I hope not.
There can be no excuse for disclosing this vital and damaging
information.
It's a disgrace.
Hannity and Santorum are only tying our hands in the war on terrorism.
This obvious hate-Bush activity is not worthy of an award.
This is worthy of jail.
When the media is wrong they have to be held accountable.
Tyranny has its rightful place in a Democracy.
I'm sure someone said that.
We need to make talkshow hosts like Hannity legally accountable for
these outrageous outings of secrets by prosecuting and persecuting
them in the most tyrannical manner.
Same goes for the leaking politicians who have taken an oath to
protect our freedoms.
Freedom to prosecute those exercising freedoms that we do not agree
with.
I don't see anything in their oath that says they can leak secrets and
harm our fighting men in harm's way.
This is not about politics.
This is about the security of the American people and is the very
reason our founding fathers opened this country.
The Founders never showed up on any radio show and revealed
Washington's attack on the Hessians sleeping in Trenton.
If it were up to Hannity and Santorum, they would have had the
Hessians stay up to watch Fox News warning them of the coming assault.
If to were up to Hannity, we would be speaking Hessian today.
It's now for Congress to step up and protect our eyes and ears by
introducing a resolution, law or whatever they call it, to proclaim
the talk show host and his blame America first ilk as, um,
anti-American.
If not, don't be surprised if this July 4th, Tony Snow, ***** Cheney
and President Bush make a pro-American proclamation by skewering
Hannity and Fox News for indeterminable damage to the war effort.
It's about the security of all of us.
It's about freedom for most of us.
It's about time.
_________________________________________
;>)
Harry
.
|
|
| User: "Harleys Husband" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
02 Jul 2006 05:53:16 PM |
|
|
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:tr7ga21ums8tl9b88r8nc90jtjj2umhscl@4ax.com...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-young/why-does-hannity-continue_b_24230.html
Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum
Must Be Prosecuted
By Steve Young
I nearly swerved into a ditch last week when Sean Hannity brought on
Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA) and Congressman Peter Hoekstra (R-MI) to
leak a classified report revealing that we had actually found weapons
of mass destruction in Iraq.
Why didn't they just stick a white flag in the back of everyone of our
fighting men in harm's way?
Hannity might as well have said that it's okay for seven guys with no
wherewithal nor weapons to blow up the Sears Tower.
Fox News's decision to run a story about classified government
information revealing our discovery of WMD only supplies terrorists
with national security information giving them a heads up that can
only undermine the war effort, endangering our troops while they are
in harm's way.
It seems that Hannity and the leakers, Santorum and Hoekstra, feel
that TV/radio ratings and getting elected is more important than the
safety of our fighting men and the protection of our borders.
Don't they realize that we are in a post 9/11 world with a post 9/11
mentality and a post 9/11 fear of everything?
Some say the terrorists aren't stupid and they already knew that we
are looking for WMD.
Does that makes it okay that we reveal the fact that we are have in
fact found WMD?
Terrorists now know specifically where we have looked and conceivably,
where we will continue to look.
With Hannity's treasonous behavior, terrorists can conceivably move
the WMD from places they are conceivably hiding them to many more
conceivable locations where they might use them against our fighting
men.
Conceivably, those same hidden WMD can be delivered to those intent on
attacking America on our own land...conceivably.
Are we going to give Hannity a Pulitzer Prize because this is proper
media oversight?
I hope not.
There can be no excuse for disclosing this vital and damaging
information.
It's a disgrace.
Hannity and Santorum are only tying our hands in the war on terrorism.
This obvious hate-Bush activity is not worthy of an award.
This is worthy of jail.
When the media is wrong they have to be held accountable.
Tyranny has its rightful place in a Democracy.
I'm sure someone said that.
We need to make talkshow hosts like Hannity legally accountable for
these outrageous outings of secrets by prosecuting and persecuting
them in the most tyrannical manner.
Same goes for the leaking politicians who have taken an oath to
protect our freedoms.
Freedom to prosecute those exercising freedoms that we do not agree
with.
I don't see anything in their oath that says they can leak secrets and
harm our fighting men in harm's way.
This is not about politics.
This is about the security of the American people and is the very
reason our founding fathers opened this country.
The Founders never showed up on any radio show and revealed
Washington's attack on the Hessians sleeping in Trenton.
If it were up to Hannity and Santorum, they would have had the
Hessians stay up to watch Fox News warning them of the coming assault.
If to were up to Hannity, we would be speaking Hessian today.
It's now for Congress to step up and protect our eyes and ears by
introducing a resolution, law or whatever they call it, to proclaim
the talk show host and his blame America first ilk as, um,
anti-American.
If not, don't be surprised if this July 4th, Tony Snow, ***** Cheney
and President Bush make a pro-American proclamation by skewering
Hannity and Fox News for indeterminable damage to the war effort.
It's about the security of all of us.
It's about freedom for most of us.
It's about time.
_________________________________________
;>)
Harry
Goose, gander, q.e.d.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Pittel" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
02 Jul 2006 05:26:43 PM |
|
|
In alt.politics.usa.republican Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-young/why-does-hannity-continue_b_24230.html
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That's as far as anyone but a looney tune brain dead loser lib dem needs to read.
--
-------------------
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
.
|
|
|
| User: "nJb" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean andSantorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
02 Jul 2006 11:10:44 PM |
|
|
Frank Pittel wrote:
In alt.politics.usa.republican Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-young/why-does-hannity-continue_b_24230.html
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That's as far as anyone but a looney tune brain dead loser lib dem needs to read.
Right on. Wouldn't want to read anything that might challenge your
beliefs. Just discount it as nonsense. Carry on.
--
Jack
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Cunningham" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
03 Jul 2006 09:19:43 AM |
|
|
"nJb" <user@example.com> wrote in message
news:e8a5bg$j6l$1@news.xmission.com...
Frank Pittel wrote:
In alt.politics.usa.republican Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-young/why-does-hannity-continue_b_24230.html
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That's as far as anyone but a looney tune brain dead loser lib dem needs
to read.
Right on. Wouldn't want to read anything that might challenge your
beliefs. Just discount it as nonsense. Carry on.
--
Jack
Jack, We should be gratefull, Frank is reading!!! A wonderfull day!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "nJb" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean andSantorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
03 Jul 2006 10:30:57 AM |
|
|
Kevin Cunningham wrote:
"nJb" <user@example.com> wrote in message
news:e8a5bg$j6l$1@news.xmission.com...
Frank Pittel wrote:
In alt.politics.usa.republican Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-young/why-does-hannity-continue_b_24230.html
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That's as far as anyone but a looney tune brain dead loser lib dem needs
to read.
Right on. Wouldn't want to read anything that might challenge your
beliefs. Just discount it as nonsense. Carry on.
--
Jack
Jack, We should be gratefull, Frank is reading!!! A wonderfull day!!!
Now if only he could comprehend. Baby steps.
--
Jack
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Pittel" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
03 Jul 2006 07:42:48 AM |
|
|
In alt.politics.usa.republican nJb <user@example.com> wrote:
: Frank Pittel wrote:
: > In alt.politics.usa.republican Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
: >
: > : http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-young/why-does-hannity-continue_b_24230.html
: > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
: > That's as far as anyone but a looney tune brain dead loser lib dem needs to read.
: >
: Right on. Wouldn't want to read anything that might challenge your
: beliefs. Just discount it as nonsense. Carry on.
The leftwing kook articles posted on the leftwing kook site are in fact nonsense and
have no credibility. You do make the perfect looney tune brain dead loser lib dem
though. I'll bet that your dumb enough to listen to moron radio on a regular bases
and even believe all the hate and lies spewed forth by alfranken and crew.
--
-------------------
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
.
|
|
|
| User: "NaCly" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
03 Jul 2006 06:34:10 PM |
|
|
"Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
news:admdnSVClI9VjTTZnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@giganews.com...
In alt.politics.usa.republican nJb <user@example.com> wrote:
: Frank Pittel wrote:
: > In alt.politics.usa.republican Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
: >
: > :
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-young/why-does-hannity-continue_b_24230.html
: > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
: > That's as far as anyone but a looney tune brain dead loser lib dem
needs to read.
: >
: Right on. Wouldn't want to read anything that might challenge your
: beliefs. Just discount it as nonsense. Carry on.
The leftwing kook articles posted on the leftwing kook site are in fact
nonsense and
have no credibility. You do make the perfect looney tune brain dead loser
lib dem
though. I'll bet that your dumb enough to listen to moron radio on a
regular bases
and even believe all the hate and lies spewed forth by alfranken and crew.
--
"Joe gets up at 6:00 am to prepare his morning coffee. He fills his pot
full of good clean drinking water because some liberal fought for minimum
water quality standards. He takes his daily medication with his first
swallow of coffee. His medications are safe to take because some liberal
fought to insure they are safe and work as advertised.
All but $10.00 of his medications are paid for by his employers
medical plan because some liberal union workers fought their employers for
paid medical insurance, now Joe gets it too. He prepares his morning
breakfast, bacon and eggs this day. Joe's bacon is safe to eat because some
liberal fought for laws to regulate the meat packing industry.
Joe takes his morning shower reaching for his shampoo; His bottle is
properly labeled with every ingredient and the amount of its contents
because some liberal fought for his right to know what he was putting on his
body and how much it contained. Joe dresses, walks outside and takes a deep
breath. The air he breathes is clean because some tree hugging liberal
fought for laws to stop industries from polluting our air.
Joe walks to the subway station for his government subsidized ride
to work; it saves him considerable money in parking and transportation fees.
You see, some liberal fought for affordable public transportation, which
gives everyone the opportunity to be a contributor.
Joe begins his work day; he has a good job with excellent pay,
medical benefits, retirement, paid holidays and vacation days because some
liberal union members fought and died for these working standards. Joe's
employer pays these standards because Joe's employer doesn't want his
employees to call the union. If Joe is hurt on the job or becomes
unemployed he'll get a worker compensation or unemployment check because
some liberal didn't think he should loose his home because of his temporary
misfortune.
It's noon time, Joe needs to make a bank deposit so he can pay some
bills. Joe's deposits are federally insured by the FSLIC because some
liberal wanted to protect Joe's money from unscrupulous bankers who ruined
the banking system before the Depression.
Joe has to pay his Fannie Mae underwritten mortgage and his below
market federal student loan because some stupid liberal decided that Joe and
the government would be better off if he was educated and earned more money
over his life-time.
Joe is home from work, he plans to visit his father this evening at
his farm home in the country. He gets in his car for the drive to dads; his
car is among the safest in the world because some liberal fought for car
safety standards.
Joe arrives at his boyhood home. He was the third generation to
live in the house financed by Farmers Home Administration because bankers
didn't want to make rural loans. The house didn't have electric until some
big government liberal stuck his nose where it didn't belong and demanded
rural electrification. (Those rural Republican's would still be sitting in
the dark).
Joe is happy to see his dad who is now retired. His dad lives on
Social Security and his union pension because some liberal made sure he
could take care of himself so Joe wouldn't have to. After his visit with
dad he gets back in his car for the ride home.
Joe turns on a radio talk show, the host's keeps saying that
liberals are bad and conservatives are good. (He doesn't tell Joe that his
beloved Republicans have fought against every protection and benefit Joe
enjoys throughout his day) Joe agrees, "We don't need those big government
liberals ruining our lives; after all, I'm a self made man who believes
everyone should take care of themselves, just like I have".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Cunningham" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
04 Jul 2006 02:11:19 PM |
|
|
"NaCly" <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote in message
news:QPhqg.9561$Nv.3203@fed1read10...
"Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
news:admdnSVClI9VjTTZnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@giganews.com...
In alt.politics.usa.republican nJb <user@example.com> wrote:
: Frank Pittel wrote:
: > In alt.politics.usa.republican Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
: >
: > :
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-young/why-does-hannity-continue_b_24230.html
: > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
: > That's as far as anyone but a looney tune brain dead loser lib dem
needs to read.
: >
: Right on. Wouldn't want to read anything that might challenge your
: beliefs. Just discount it as nonsense. Carry on.
The leftwing kook articles posted on the leftwing kook site are in fact
nonsense and
have no credibility. You do make the perfect looney tune brain dead loser
lib dem
though. I'll bet that your dumb enough to listen to moron radio on a
regular bases
and even believe all the hate and lies spewed forth by alfranken and
crew.
--
"Joe gets up at 6:00 am to prepare his morning coffee. He fills his pot
full of good clean drinking water because some liberal fought for minimum
water quality standards. He takes his daily medication with his first
swallow of coffee. His medications are safe to take because some liberal
fought to insure they are safe and work as advertised.
All but $10.00 of his medications are paid for by his employers
medical plan because some liberal union workers fought their employers for
paid medical insurance, now Joe gets it too. He prepares his morning
breakfast, bacon and eggs this day. Joe's bacon is safe to eat because
some
liberal fought for laws to regulate the meat packing industry.
Joe takes his morning shower reaching for his shampoo; His bottle
is
properly labeled with every ingredient and the amount of its contents
because some liberal fought for his right to know what he was putting on
his
body and how much it contained. Joe dresses, walks outside and takes a
deep
breath. The air he breathes is clean because some tree hugging liberal
fought for laws to stop industries from polluting our air.
Joe walks to the subway station for his government subsidized ride
to work; it saves him considerable money in parking and transportation
fees.
You see, some liberal fought for affordable public transportation, which
gives everyone the opportunity to be a contributor.
Joe begins his work day; he has a good job with excellent pay,
medical benefits, retirement, paid holidays and vacation days because some
liberal union members fought and died for these working standards. Joe's
employer pays these standards because Joe's employer doesn't want his
employees to call the union. If Joe is hurt on the job or becomes
unemployed he'll get a worker compensation or unemployment check because
some liberal didn't think he should loose his home because of his
temporary
misfortune.
It's noon time, Joe needs to make a bank deposit so he can pay some
bills. Joe's deposits are federally insured by the FSLIC because some
liberal wanted to protect Joe's money from unscrupulous bankers who ruined
the banking system before the Depression.
Joe has to pay his Fannie Mae underwritten mortgage and his below
market federal student loan because some stupid liberal decided that Joe
and
the government would be better off if he was educated and earned more
money
over his life-time.
Joe is home from work, he plans to visit his father this evening at
his farm home in the country. He gets in his car for the drive to dads;
his
car is among the safest in the world because some liberal fought for car
safety standards.
Joe arrives at his boyhood home. He was the third generation to
live in the house financed by Farmers Home Administration because bankers
didn't want to make rural loans. The house didn't have electric until
some
big government liberal stuck his nose where it didn't belong and demanded
rural electrification. (Those rural Republican's would still be sitting
in
the dark).
Joe is happy to see his dad who is now retired. His dad lives on
Social Security and his union pension because some liberal made sure he
could take care of himself so Joe wouldn't have to. After his visit with
dad he gets back in his car for the ride home.
Joe turns on a radio talk show, the host's keeps saying that
liberals are bad and conservatives are good. (He doesn't tell Joe that
his
beloved Republicans have fought against every protection and benefit Joe
enjoys throughout his day) Joe agrees, "We don't need those big
government
liberals ruining our lives; after all, I'm a self made man who believes
everyone should take care of themselves, just like I have".
Thanks for posting that! We tend to forget that, through out history,
liberals pushed through progressive legislation that the conservatives
fought against like the above.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Pittel" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
10 Jul 2006 09:46:58 PM |
|
|
In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: news:admdnSVClI9VjTTZnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > In alt.politics.usa.republican nJb <user@example.com> wrote:
: > : Frank Pittel wrote:
: >
: > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
: > wrote:
: > : >
: > : > :
: > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-young/why-does-hannity-continue_b_24230.html
: > : > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
: > : > That's as far as anyone but a looney tune brain dead loser lib dem
: > needs to read.
: > : >
: >
: > : Right on. Wouldn't want to read anything that might challenge your
: > : beliefs. Just discount it as nonsense. Carry on.
: >
: > The leftwing kook articles posted on the leftwing kook site are in fact
: > nonsense and
: > have no credibility. You do make the perfect looney tune brain dead loser
: > lib dem
: > though. I'll bet that your dumb enough to listen to moron radio on a
: > regular bases
: > and even believe all the hate and lies spewed forth by alfranken and crew.
: > --
: "Joe gets up at 6:00 am to prepare his morning coffee. He fills his pot
: full of good clean drinking water because some liberal fought for minimum
: water quality standards. He takes his daily medication with his first
: swallow of coffee. His medications are safe to take because some liberal
: fought to insure they are safe and work as advertised.
Your credible evidence of this is............?
: All but $10.00 of his medications are paid for by his employers
: medical plan because some liberal union workers fought their employers for
: paid medical insurance, now Joe gets it too. He prepares his morning
: breakfast, bacon and eggs this day. Joe's bacon is safe to eat because some
: liberal fought for laws to regulate the meat packing industry.
Your credible proof that Joe is a member of a union is......? I've never been a
member of a union and every job I've had has offered medical and dental insurance.
Nice try but once again your claim is a lie.
: Joe takes his morning shower reaching for his shampoo; His bottle is
: properly labeled with every ingredient and the amount of its contents
: because some liberal fought for his right to know what he was putting on his
: body and how much it contained. Joe dresses, walks outside and takes a deep
: breath. The air he breathes is clean because some tree hugging liberal
: fought for laws to stop industries from polluting our air.
Your credible evidence of the above lie is...............?
: Joe walks to the subway station for his government subsidized ride
: to work; it saves him considerable money in parking and transportation fees.
: You see, some liberal fought for affordable public transportation, which
: gives everyone the opportunity to be a contributor.
Public transportation was run by private companies long before the looney tune
brain dead loser lib dems took them over and ran them into the toilet.
: Joe begins his work day; he has a good job with excellent pay,
: medical benefits, retirement, paid holidays and vacation days because some
: liberal union members fought and died for these working standards. Joe's
: employer pays these standards because Joe's employer doesn't want his
: employees to call the union. If Joe is hurt on the job or becomes
: unemployed he'll get a worker compensation or unemployment check because
: some liberal didn't think he should loose his home because of his temporary
: misfortune.
Your credible evidence of any of those lies is...............?
: It's noon time, Joe needs to make a bank deposit so he can pay some
: bills. Joe's deposits are federally insured by the FSLIC because some
: liberal wanted to protect Joe's money from unscrupulous bankers who ruined
: the banking system before the Depression.
More lies from the looney tune brain dead loser lib dems.
: Joe has to pay his Fannie Mae underwritten mortgage and his below
: market federal student loan because some stupid liberal decided that Joe and
: the government would be better off if he was educated and earned more money
: over his life-time.
More lies from the looney tune brain dead loser lib dems.
: Joe is home from work, he plans to visit his father this evening at
: his farm home in the country. He gets in his car for the drive to dads; his
: car is among the safest in the world because some liberal fought for car
: safety standards.
Not even close. The cars made in Germany are much sager.
: Joe arrives at his boyhood home. He was the third generation to
: live in the house financed by Farmers Home Administration because bankers
: didn't want to make rural loans. The house didn't have electric until some
: big government liberal stuck his nose where it didn't belong and demanded
: rural electrification. (Those rural Republican's would still be sitting in
: the dark).
Just a couple of paragraphs you lied and gave credit for Joe having a house to
Fannie Mae. Now it's the farmers home administration.
: Joe is happy to see his dad who is now retired. His dad lives on
: Social Security and his union pension because some liberal made sure he
: could take care of himself so Joe wouldn't have to. After his visit with
: dad he gets back in his car for the ride home.
Thanks to the looney tune brain dead loser lib dems social security won't
be around much longer. There won't be any pension when the cost of looney
tune brain dead loser lib dem run unions force the company making the pension
payment out of business. When that happens in another couple of years Joe's
father can say goodbye to his pension.
: Joe turns on a radio talk show, the host's keeps saying that
: liberals are bad and conservatives are good. (He doesn't tell Joe that his
: beloved Republicans have fought against every protection and benefit Joe
: enjoys throughout his day) Joe agrees, "We don't need those big government
: liberals ruining our lives; after all, I'm a self made man who believes
: everyone should take care of themselves, just like I have".
More lies from the looney tune brain dead loser lib dems.
--
-------------------
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
.
|
|
|
| User: "NaCly" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
11 Jul 2006 09:05:02 AM |
|
|
"Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
news:a8CdnQL2lJS_jC7ZnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
(snip)
Your credible proof that Joe is a member of a union is......? I've never
been a
member of a union and every job I've had has offered medical and dental
insurance.
Nice try but once again your claim is a lie.
If not for Unions most people would be making minimum wage. Your job offers
the benefits to be competitive with companies that are union. Do you ever
do any research on your own? If not for unions, workers would be working 12
to 15 hours days for little money and no benefits. People like you would
really like to see slavery brought back. When this country was 35% union,
one person could earn enough money to rise a family and sent his children to
college. Now that the unions are 7% it take two people working 2 or 3 job
just to stay ahead.
(snip)
Your credible evidence of any of those lies is...............?
: It's noon time, Joe needs to make a bank deposit so he can pay
some
: bills. Joe's deposits are federally insured by the FSLIC because some
: liberal wanted to protect Joe's money from unscrupulous bankers who
ruined
: the banking system before the Depression.
More lies from the looney tune brain dead loser lib dems.
It was conservative policies that drove the country into the first great
republican depression. The same policies that the shrub has put back in
place.
(snip)
: Joe is happy to see his dad who is now retired. His dad lives
on
: Social Security and his union pension because some liberal made sure he
: could take care of himself so Joe wouldn't have to. After his visit
with
: dad he gets back in his car for the ride home.
Thanks to the looney tune brain dead loser lib dems social security won't
be around much longer. There won't be any pension when the cost of looney
tune brain dead loser lib dem run unions force the company making the
pension
payment out of business. When that happens in another couple of years
Joe's
father can say goodbye to his pension.
I love this part. There are companies going broke paying thier CEO 20
Million a year. Right now in this country the average CEO makes before
lunch what the average worker makes all year. And now you have the balls to
say it is the unions fault that they are going broke. neo-cons the prefect
example of rectal head insertion.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Pittel" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
11 Jul 2006 07:36:35 PM |
|
|
In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: news:a8CdnQL2lJS_jC7ZnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: (snip)
: >
: >
: > Your credible proof that Joe is a member of a union is......? I've never
: > been a
: > member of a union and every job I've had has offered medical and dental
: > insurance.
: > Nice try but once again your claim is a lie.
: If not for Unions most people would be making minimum wage. Your job offers
: the benefits to be competitive with companies that are union. Do you ever
: do any research on your own? If not for unions, workers would be working 12
: to 15 hours days for little money and no benefits. People like you would
: really like to see slavery brought back. When this country was 35% union,
: one person could earn enough money to rise a family and sent his children to
: college. Now that the unions are 7% it take two people working 2 or 3 job
: just to stay ahead.
Your credible evidence for any and all of that??
: (snip)
: > Your credible evidence of any of those lies is...............?
: >
: > : It's noon time, Joe needs to make a bank deposit so he can pay
: > some
: > : bills. Joe's deposits are federally insured by the FSLIC because some
: > : liberal wanted to protect Joe's money from unscrupulous bankers who
: > ruined
: > : the banking system before the Depression.
: >
: > More lies from the looney tune brain dead loser lib dems.
: It was conservative policies that drove the country into the first great
: republican depression. The same policies that the shrub has put back in
: place.
??
: (snip)
: > : Joe is happy to see his dad who is now retired. His dad lives
: > on
: > : Social Security and his union pension because some liberal made sure he
: > : could take care of himself so Joe wouldn't have to. After his visit
: > with
: > : dad he gets back in his car for the ride home.
: >
: > Thanks to the looney tune brain dead loser lib dems social security won't
: > be around much longer. There won't be any pension when the cost of looney
: > tune brain dead loser lib dem run unions force the company making the
: > pension
: > payment out of business. When that happens in another couple of years
: > Joe's
: > father can say goodbye to his pension.
: I love this part. There are companies going broke paying thier CEO 20
: Million a year. Right now in this country the average CEO makes before
: lunch what the average worker makes all year. And now you have the balls to
: say it is the unions fault that they are going broke. neo-cons the prefect
: example of rectal head insertion.
Your credible evidence for any of those lies??
--
-------------------
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
.
|
|
|
| User: "NaCly" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
12 Jul 2006 08:14:36 AM |
|
|
"Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
news:HPmdnSyO3PqO2SnZnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@giganews.com...
In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: news:a8CdnQL2lJS_jC7ZnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: (snip)
: >
: >
: > Your credible proof that Joe is a member of a union is......? I've
never
: > been a
: > member of a union and every job I've had has offered medical and
dental
: > insurance.
: > Nice try but once again your claim is a lie.
: If not for Unions most people would be making minimum wage. Your job
offers
: the benefits to be competitive with companies that are union. Do you
ever
: do any research on your own? If not for unions, workers would be
working 12
: to 15 hours days for little money and no benefits. People like you
would
: really like to see slavery brought back. When this country was 35%
union,
: one person could earn enough money to rise a family and sent his
children to
: college. Now that the unions are 7% it take two people working 2 or 3
job
: just to stay ahead.
Your credible evidence for any and all of that??
http://www.laborresearch.org/charts.php?id=34
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labor_rights
Labor rights or workers' rights are a group of legal rights and claimed
human rights having to do with labor relations between workers and their
employers, usually obtained under labor and employment law. In general,
these rights' debates have to do with negotiating workers' pay and benefits
to ensure that they have the highest standard of living, and safe working
conditions. One of the most basic of these rights is the right to unionize,
a form of freedom of association. Unions allow workers to take advantage of
collective bargaining and industrial action to increase their wages and
otherwise improve their situation. The labor movement initially focused on
this right to unionize, but attention has shifted to other rights.
Critics of the labor rights movement claim that regulation promoted by labor
rights activists may limit opportunities for work. In the United States,
critics objected unions establishing closed shops, situations where
employers could only hire union members. The Taft-Hartley Act banned the
closed shop but allowed the less restrictive union shop. Taft-Hartley also
allowed states to pass right-to-work laws, which require an open shop where
a worker's employment is not affected by his union membership. Proponents of
"right to work" legislation claim that workers have the right to work
whether or not they join a union. Labor counters that the open shop leads to
a free rider problem.
: (snip)
: > Your credible evidence of any of those lies is...............?
: >
: > : It's noon time, Joe needs to make a bank deposit so he can
pay
: > some
: > : bills. Joe's deposits are federally insured by the FSLIC because
some
: > : liberal wanted to protect Joe's money from unscrupulous bankers who
: > ruined
: > : the banking system before the Depression.
: >
: > More lies from the looney tune brain dead loser lib dems.
: It was conservative policies that drove the country into the first great
: republican depression. The same policies that the shrub has put back in
: place.
??
: (snip)
: > : Joe is happy to see his dad who is now retired. His dad
lives
: > on
: > : Social Security and his union pension because some liberal made sure
he
: > : could take care of himself so Joe wouldn't have to. After his visit
: > with
: > : dad he gets back in his car for the ride home.
: >
: > Thanks to the looney tune brain dead loser lib dems social security
won't
: > be around much longer. There won't be any pension when the cost of
looney
: > tune brain dead loser lib dem run unions force the company making the
: > pension
: > payment out of business. When that happens in another couple of years
: > Joe's
: > father can say goodbye to his pension.
: I love this part. There are companies going broke paying thier CEO 20
: Million a year. Right now in this country the average CEO makes before
: lunch what the average worker makes all year. And now you have the
balls to
: say it is the unions fault that they are going broke. neo-cons the
prefect
: example of rectal head insertion.
Your credible evidence for any of those lies??
http://workinglife.typepad.com/daily_blog/2006/06/ceo_vs_minimum_.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Pittel" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
12 Jul 2006 02:12:22 PM |
|
|
In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: news:HPmdnSyO3PqO2SnZnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@giganews.com...
: > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: >
: > : "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: > : news:a8CdnQL2lJS_jC7ZnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: >
: > : (snip)
: > : >
: > : >
: > : > Your credible proof that Joe is a member of a union is......? I've
: > never
: > : > been a
: > : > member of a union and every job I've had has offered medical and
: > dental
: > : > insurance.
: > : > Nice try but once again your claim is a lie.
: >
: > : If not for Unions most people would be making minimum wage. Your job
: > offers
: > : the benefits to be competitive with companies that are union. Do you
: > ever
: > : do any research on your own? If not for unions, workers would be
: > working 12
: > : to 15 hours days for little money and no benefits. People like you
: > would
: > : really like to see slavery brought back. When this country was 35%
: > union,
: > : one person could earn enough money to rise a family and sent his
: > children to
: > : college. Now that the unions are 7% it take two people working 2 or 3
: > job
: > : just to stay ahead.
: >
: > Your credible evidence for any and all of that??
: http://www.laborresearch.org/charts.php?id=34
The request was for credible evidence, not union propoganda!!
: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labor_rights
: Labor rights or workers' rights are a group of legal rights and claimed
: human rights having to do with labor relations between workers and their
: employers, usually obtained under labor and employment law. In general,
: these rights' debates have to do with negotiating workers' pay and benefits
: to ensure that they have the highest standard of living, and safe working
: conditions. One of the most basic of these rights is the right to unionize,
: a form of freedom of association. Unions allow workers to take advantage of
: collective bargaining and industrial action to increase their wages and
: otherwise improve their situation. The labor movement initially focused on
: this right to unionize, but attention has shifted to other rights.
: Critics of the labor rights movement claim that regulation promoted by labor
: rights activists may limit opportunities for work. In the United States,
: critics objected unions establishing closed shops, situations where
: employers could only hire union members. The Taft-Hartley Act banned the
: closed shop but allowed the less restrictive union shop. Taft-Hartley also
: allowed states to pass right-to-work laws, which require an open shop where
: a worker's employment is not affected by his union membership. Proponents of
: "right to work" legislation claim that workers have the right to work
: whether or not they join a union. Labor counters that the open shop leads to
: a free rider problem.
This isn't any where near credible evidence to support your lie.
: >
: > : (snip)
: >
: >
: >
: > : > Your credible evidence of any of those lies is...............?
: > : >
: > : > : It's noon time, Joe needs to make a bank deposit so he can
: > pay
: > : > some
: > : > : bills. Joe's deposits are federally insured by the FSLIC because
: > some
: > : > : liberal wanted to protect Joe's money from unscrupulous bankers who
: > : > ruined
: > : > : the banking system before the Depression.
: > : >
: > : > More lies from the looney tune brain dead loser lib dems.
: >
: >
: > : It was conservative policies that drove the country into the first great
: > : republican depression. The same policies that the shrub has put back in
: > : place.
: >
: > ??
: >
: >
: > : (snip)
: >
: >
: > : > : Joe is happy to see his dad who is now retired. His dad
: > lives
: > : > on
: > : > : Social Security and his union pension because some liberal made sure
: > he
: > : > : could take care of himself so Joe wouldn't have to. After his visit
: > : > with
: > : > : dad he gets back in his car for the ride home.
: > : >
: > : > Thanks to the looney tune brain dead loser lib dems social security
: > won't
: > : > be around much longer. There won't be any pension when the cost of
: > looney
: > : > tune brain dead loser lib dem run unions force the company making the
: > : > pension
: > : > payment out of business. When that happens in another couple of years
: > : > Joe's
: > : > father can say goodbye to his pension.
: >
: >
: > : I love this part. There are companies going broke paying thier CEO 20
: > : Million a year. Right now in this country the average CEO makes before
: > : lunch what the average worker makes all year. And now you have the
: > balls to
: > : say it is the unions fault that they are going broke. neo-cons the
: > prefect
: > : example of rectal head insertion.
: >
: >
: > Your credible evidence for any of those lies??
: >
: >
: http://workinglife.typepad.com/daily_blog/2006/06/ceo_vs_minimum_.html
Another looney left kook site run by a leftwing kook that by his own
admission was the president of a union for 14 years. What's the
matter, can't find any credible evidence to support your lies??
--
-------------------
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "NaCly" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
12 Jul 2006 08:51:33 AM |
|
|
"Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
news:HPmdnSyO3PqO2SnZnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@giganews.com...
In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: news:a8CdnQL2lJS_jC7ZnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: (snip)
If you weren't so fucking stupid you could do you own research. Even a
fucking dumb ***** like you can use WWW.GOOGLE.COM, it is that simple
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Pittel" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
12 Jul 2006 02:05:52 PM |
|
|
In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: news:HPmdnSyO3PqO2SnZnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@giganews.com...
: > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: >
: > : "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: > : news:a8CdnQL2lJS_jC7ZnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: >
: > : (snip)
: If you weren't so fucking stupid you could do you own research. Even a
: fucking dumb ***** like you can use WWW.GOOGLE.COM, it is that simple
You made the claim, you provide the credible evidence to back it up.
--
-------------------
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
.
|
|
|
| User: "NaCly" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
13 Jul 2006 08:22:03 AM |
|
|
"Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
news:XaydndkQY7ON1SjZnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@giganews.com...
In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: news:HPmdnSyO3PqO2SnZnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@giganews.com...
: > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: >
: > : "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: > : news:a8CdnQL2lJS_jC7ZnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: >
: > : (snip)
: If you weren't so fucking stupid you could do you own research. Even a
: fucking dumb ***** like you can use WWW.GOOGLE.COM, it is that simple
You made the claim, you provide the credible evidence to back it up.
You prove I'm wrong
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Pittel" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
13 Jul 2006 11:20:39 AM |
|
|
In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: news:XaydndkQY7ON1SjZnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: >
: > : "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: > : news:HPmdnSyO3PqO2SnZnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@giganews.com...
: > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: > : >
: > : > : "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: > : > : news:a8CdnQL2lJS_jC7ZnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > : > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: > : >
: > : > : (snip)
: >
: >
: > : If you weren't so fucking stupid you could do you own research. Even a
: > : fucking dumb ***** like you can use WWW.GOOGLE.COM, it is that simple
: >
: > You made the claim, you provide the credible evidence to back it up.
: >
: >
: You prove I'm wrong
You made the claim which puts the burden of proof on you. Nice try at
ducking having to prove your statement.
--
-------------------
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
.
|
|
|
| User: "NaCly" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
13 Jul 2006 12:44:25 PM |
|
|
"Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
news:nIydna80hd1K7yvZnZ2dnUVZ_qSdnZ2d@giganews.com...
In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: news:XaydndkQY7ON1SjZnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: >
: > : "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: > : news:HPmdnSyO3PqO2SnZnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@giganews.com...
: > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: > : >
: > : > : "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: > : > : news:a8CdnQL2lJS_jC7ZnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > : > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net>
wrote:
: > : >
: > : > : (snip)
: >
: >
: > : If you weren't so fucking stupid you could do you own research.
Even a
: > : fucking dumb ***** like you can use WWW.GOOGLE.COM, it is that simple
: >
: > You made the claim, you provide the credible evidence to back it up.
: >
: >
: You prove I'm wrong
You made the claim which puts the burden of proof on you. Nice try at
ducking having to prove your statement.
You are the one that claims I'm wrong, prove me wrong if you can.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Pittel" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
13 Jul 2006 02:06:27 PM |
|
|
In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: news:nIydna80hd1K7yvZnZ2dnUVZ_qSdnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: >
: > : "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: > : news:XaydndkQY7ON1SjZnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: > : >
: > : > : "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: > : > : news:HPmdnSyO3PqO2SnZnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@giganews.com...
: > : > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: > : > : >
: > : > : > : "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: > : > : > : news:a8CdnQL2lJS_jC7ZnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > : > : > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net>
: > wrote:
: > : > : >
: > : > : > : (snip)
: > : >
: > : >
: > : > : If you weren't so fucking stupid you could do you own research.
: > Even a
: > : > : fucking dumb ***** like you can use WWW.GOOGLE.COM, it is that simple
: > : >
: > : > You made the claim, you provide the credible evidence to back it up.
: > : >
: > : >
: >
: > : You prove I'm wrong
: >
: > You made the claim which puts the burden of proof on you. Nice try at
: > ducking having to prove your statement.
: >
: You are the one that claims I'm wrong, prove me wrong if you can.
I see that you couldn't find any evidence to support your lie. It's
not uncommon for idiots like you to spew forth your fantasies of hate
and lies while hoping not to get called on all the lies. The story
about Joe gets an A+ for creativity and a 0 on facts, truthfulness,
and believability.
--
-------------------
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
.
|
|
|
| User: "NaCly" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
14 Jul 2006 06:45:01 AM |
|
|
"Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
news:d5ednTG0cuAuBCvZnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@giganews.com...
In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: news:nIydna80hd1K7yvZnZ2dnUVZ_qSdnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: >
: > : "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: > : news:XaydndkQY7ON1SjZnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: > : >
: > : > : "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: > : > : news:HPmdnSyO3PqO2SnZnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@giganews.com...
: > : > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net>
wrote:
: > : > : >
: > : > : > : "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in
message
: > : > : > : news:a8CdnQL2lJS_jC7ZnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > : > : > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net>
: > wrote:
: > : > : >
: > : > : > : (snip)
: > : >
: > : >
: > : > : If you weren't so fucking stupid you could do you own research.
: > Even a
: > : > : fucking dumb ***** like you can use WWW.GOOGLE.COM, it is that
simple
: > : >
: > : > You made the claim, you provide the credible evidence to back it
up.
: > : >
: > : >
: >
: > : You prove I'm wrong
: >
: > You made the claim which puts the burden of proof on you. Nice try at
: > ducking having to prove your statement.
: >
: You are the one that claims I'm wrong, prove me wrong if you can.
I see that you couldn't find any evidence to support your lie. It's
not uncommon for idiots like you to spew forth your fantasies of hate
and lies while hoping not to get called on all the lies. The story
about Joe gets an A+ for creativity and a 0 on facts, truthfulness,
and believability.
--
I see you can't find ***** to support your position
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Pittel" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
14 Jul 2006 10:31:26 AM |
|
|
In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: news:d5ednTG0cuAuBCvZnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: >
: > : "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: > : news:nIydna80hd1K7yvZnZ2dnUVZ_qSdnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: > : >
: > : > : "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: > : > : news:XaydndkQY7ON1SjZnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > : > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: > : > : >
: > : > : > : "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: > : > : > : news:HPmdnSyO3PqO2SnZnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@giganews.com...
: > : > : > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net>
: > wrote:
: > : > : > : >
: > : > : > : > : "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in
: > message
: > : > : > : > : news:a8CdnQL2lJS_jC7ZnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > : > : > : > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net>
: > : > wrote:
: > : > : > : >
: > : > : > : > : (snip)
: > : > : >
: > : > : >
: > : > : > : If you weren't so fucking stupid you could do you own research.
: > : > Even a
: > : > : > : fucking dumb ***** like you can use WWW.GOOGLE.COM, it is that
: > simple
: > : > : >
: > : > : > You made the claim, you provide the credible evidence to back it
: > up.
: > : > : >
: > : > : >
: > : >
: > : > : You prove I'm wrong
: > : >
: > : > You made the claim which puts the burden of proof on you. Nice try at
: > : > ducking having to prove your statement.
: > : >
: >
: >
: > : You are the one that claims I'm wrong, prove me wrong if you can.
: >
: > I see that you couldn't find any evidence to support your lie. It's
: > not uncommon for idiots like you to spew forth your fantasies of hate
: > and lies while hoping not to get called on all the lies. The story
: > about Joe gets an A+ for creativity and a 0 on facts, truthfulness,
: > and believability.
: > --
: >
: I see you can't find ***** to support your position
Your inability to provide credible evidence is my proof.
--
-------------------
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
.
|
|
|
| User: "NaCly" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
14 Jul 2006 03:06:52 PM |
|
|
"Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
news:EIudnapJs_hTJSrZnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@giganews.com...
In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: news:d5ednTG0cuAuBCvZnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: >
: > : "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: > : news:nIydna80hd1K7yvZnZ2dnUVZ_qSdnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: > : >
: > : > : "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: > : > : news:XaydndkQY7ON1SjZnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > : > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net>
wrote:
: > : > : >
: > : > : > : "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in
message
: > : > : > : news:HPmdnSyO3PqO2SnZnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@giganews.com...
: > : > : > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net>
: > wrote:
: > : > : > : >
: > : > : > : > : "Frank Pittel" <fwp@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in
: > message
: > : > : > : > : news:a8CdnQL2lJS_jC7ZnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
: > : > : > : > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly
<RustyFarmer@cox.net>
: > : > wrote:
: > : > : > : >
: > : > : > : > : (snip)
: > : > : >
: > : > : >
: > : > : > : If you weren't so fucking stupid you could do you own
research.
: > : > Even a
: > : > : > : fucking dumb ***** like you can use WWW.GOOGLE.COM, it is that
: > simple
: > : > : >
: > : > : > You made the claim, you provide the credible evidence to back
it
: > up.
: > : > : >
: > : > : >
: > : >
: > : > : You prove I'm wrong
: > : >
: > : > You made the claim which puts the burden of proof on you. Nice try
at
: > : > ducking having to prove your statement.
: > : >
: >
: >
: > : You are the one that claims I'm wrong, prove me wrong if you can.
: >
: > I see that you couldn't find any evidence to support your lie. It's
: > not uncommon for idiots like you to spew forth your fantasies of hate
: > and lies while hoping not to get called on all the lies. The story
: > about Joe gets an A+ for creativity and a 0 on facts, truthfulness,
: > and believability.
: > --
: >
: I see you can't find ***** to support your position
Your inability to provide credible evidence is my proof.
--
Your inability to prove me wrong is my proof.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "NaCly" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
15 Jul 2006 12:01:34 AM |
|
|
Non-union
James A. Skinner
Chief Executive Officer
McDonald's Corporation
In 2005, James A. Skinner raked in $3,429,800 in total compensation
including stock option grants* from McDonald's Corporation.
From previous years' stock option grants, the McDonald's Corporation
executive cashed out $729,144 in stock option exercises.
And James A. Skinner has another $8,231,200 in unexercised stock options
from previous years.
At McDonald's average wage of $7.23 an hour. A worker would have to work
228 years to equal James A. Skinner's 2005 compensation.
Before lunch James A. Skinner has earned $6595.77 that is 913 hours of work
for an empoylee close to half a year wages
Union
W. James McNerney
Chief Executive Officer
Boeing Company (The)
In 2005, W. James McNerney raked in $28,855,294 in total compensation
including stock option grants* from Boeing Company (The). And W. James
McNerney has another $247,158 in unexercised stock options from previous
years.
The average worker at Boeing makes $50,000 a year and would have to work 577
years to equal W. James McNerney's 2005 compensation. You'd better get
working, because you can't take a vacation until 2583 A.D.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "NaCly" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
12 Jul 2006 09:13:37 AM |
|
|
http://www.aflcio.org/corporatewatch/paywatch/pay/index.cfm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Pittel" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean and Santorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
12 Jul 2006 02:04:52 PM |
|
|
In alt.politics.usa.republican NaCly <RustyFarmer@cox.net> wrote:
: http://www.aflcio.org/corporatewatch/paywatch/pay/index.cfm
I see that you couldn't find a credible source so you decided to
prove that unions are responsible for that's good with labor by
quoting a self serving statement made by the unions!! ROFLMAO!! :-)
--
-------------------
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "nJb" |
|
| Title: Re: Why does Hannity Continue to Aid the Terrorists? -- Sean andSantorum Must Be Prosecuted. |
03 Jul 2006 10:29:55 AM |
|
|
Frank Pittel wrote:
In alt.politics.usa.republican nJb <user@example.com> wrote:
: Frank Pittel wrote:
: > In alt.politics.usa.republican Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
: >
: > : http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-young/why-does-hannity-continue_b_24230.html
: > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
: > That's as far as anyone but a looney tune brain dead loser lib dem needs to read.
: >
: Right on. Wouldn't want to read anything that might challenge your
: beliefs. Just discount it as nonsense. Carry on.
The leftwing kook articles posted on the leftwing kook site are in fact nonsense and
have no credibility. You do make the perfect looney tune brain dead loser lib dem
though. I'll bet that your dumb enough to listen to moron radio on a regular bases
and even believe all the hate and lies spewed forth by alfranken and crew.
I have never listened to Air America, if that's what you're referring
to. Never. Not even once. I listen to Michael Savage, Hannity, O'Reilly
most every day. When I'm feeling down and need a good laugh, I listen to
Rush. I have enough confidence in myself to want to listen to opposing
points of view.
Now, who's the loony toon brain dead loser? That would be you and your
ilk. Those who can't even stand to hear an opposing POV. Sad group indeed.
--
Jack
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
