| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Hope" |
| Date: |
08 Jun 2005 09:51:43 AM |
| Object: |
Wiil Bush and Blair swear, under oath, that they didn't fix intelligence? |
The two expressed common ground most emphatically on the Downing
Street memo, which was written by Matthew Rycroft, a top aide to Mr.
Blair.
In particular, it reports that Sir Richard Dearlove, the chief of
Britain's Secret Intelligence Service, had been in talks in Washington
and had told other senior British officials that Mr. Bush "wanted to
remove" Mr. Hussein "through military action, justified by the
conjunction of terrorism and W.M.D.," or weapons of mass destruction.
"But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy,"
Sir Richard was reported in the memo to have told his colleagues.
From The New York Times, 6/8/05:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/08/international/08prexy.html?
Bush and Blair Deny 'Fixed' Iraq Reports
By ELISABETH BUMILLER
WASHINGTON -
President Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain presented a
united front on Tuesday against a recently disclosed British
government memorandum that said in July 2002 that American
intelligence was being "fixed" around the policy of removing Saddam
Hussein in Iraq.
"There's nothing farther from the truth," Mr. Bush said in his first
public comments about the so-called Downing Street memo, which has
created anger among the administration's critics who see it as
evidence that the president was intent to go to war with Iraq earlier
than the White House has said.
"Look, both of us didn't want to use our military," Mr. Bush added.
"Nobody wants to commit military into combat. It's the last option."
Mr. Blair, standing at Mr. Bush's side in a joint news conference in
the East Room of the White House, said, "No, the facts were not being
fixed in any shape or form at all."
The statements contradicted assertions in the memorandum, which was
first disclosed by The Sunday Times of London on May 1 and which
records the minutes of a meeting of Mr. Blair's senior policy advisers
more than half a year before the war with Iraq began.
___________________________________________________________
Well, are they saying that the memo doesn't exist? What in hell are
they saying?
Harry
.
|
|
| User: "XTS" |
|
| Title: Re: Wiil Bush and Blair swear, under oath, that they didn't fix intelligence? |
08 Jun 2005 09:57:32 AM |
|
|
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:ff1ea19dlmd8thmgp9sqo863pfi4role5v@4ax.com...
The two expressed common ground most emphatically on the Downing
Street memo, which was written by Matthew Rycroft, a top aide to Mr.
Blair.
In particular, it reports that Sir Richard Dearlove, the chief of
Britain's Secret Intelligence Service, had been in talks in Washington
and had told other senior British officials that Mr. Bush "wanted to
remove" Mr. Hussein "through military action, justified by the
conjunction of terrorism and W.M.D.," or weapons of mass destruction.
"But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy,"
Sir Richard was reported in the memo to have told his colleagues.
From The New York Times, 6/8/05:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/08/international/08prexy.html?
Bush and Blair Deny 'Fixed' Iraq Reports
By ELISABETH BUMILLER
WASHINGTON -
President Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain presented a
united front on Tuesday against a recently disclosed British
government memorandum that said in July 2002 that American
intelligence was being "fixed" around the policy of removing Saddam
Hussein in Iraq.
"There's nothing farther from the truth," Mr. Bush said in his first
public comments about the so-called Downing Street memo, which has
created anger among the administration's critics who see it as
evidence that the president was intent to go to war with Iraq earlier
than the White House has said.
"Look, both of us didn't want to use our military," Mr. Bush added.
"Nobody wants to commit military into combat. It's the last option."
Mr. Blair, standing at Mr. Bush's side in a joint news conference in
the East Room of the White House, said, "No, the facts were not being
fixed in any shape or form at all."
The statements contradicted assertions in the memorandum, which was
first disclosed by The Sunday Times of London on May 1 and which
records the minutes of a meeting of Mr. Blair's senior policy advisers
more than half a year before the war with Iraq began.
___________________________________________________________
Well, are they saying that the memo doesn't exist? What in hell are
they saying?
Harry
They're saying, "We're fucked, so we must tell more lies, to cover the other
lies."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Smirks" |
|
| Title: Re: Wiil Bush and Blair swear, under oath, that they didn't fix intelligence? |
08 Jun 2005 10:18:28 AM |
|
|
Harry Hope posted:
Wiil Bush and Blair swear, under oath, that they didn't fix intelligence?
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush said Thursday he "answered every
question" posed to him by the 9/11 commission during what was described as
an extraordinary session at the White House with the panel investigating
the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
"It was wide-ranging, it was important, it was just a good discussion,"
Bush told reporters in the White House Rose Garden, shortly after the
closed-door session ended.
The president dismissed suggestions that he appeared before the panel with
Cheney to coordinate stories.
"If we had something to hide, we wouldn't have met with them in the first
place," Bush said. "We answered all their questions."
Bush said it was important for him and Cheney to appear together so that
commission members could "see our body language... how we work together."
Bush had only positive words for the session.
"They had a lot of questions and ... I'm glad I did it," Bush said. "I'm
glad I took the time."
But the administration initially opposed the creation of the commission.
The White House relented amid pressure from some 9/11 family members and it
later backed down from its opposition to an extension of time for the
commission.
Bush and Cheney did not testify before the panel -- they were not under
oath and there was to be no recording made of the session nor a
stenographer in the room.
The two members of the White House counsel's staff were expected to take
notes during the session, and the commission members were also allowed to
take handwritten notes.
Bush brushed off a question from a reporter Thursday on whether 9/11
families were entitled to a transcript of the session.
"You asked me that question yesterday," Bush replied. "I got the same
answer."
He did not repeat the answer, but the White House has said there will not
be a transcript of the session. Bush said he expects details of his
"conversation" with the commission to go into its final report.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Joe Lunchpail" |
|
| Title: Re: Wiil Bush and Blair swear, under oath, that they didn't fix intelligence? |
08 Jun 2005 02:09:35 PM |
|
|
Will liberals ever admit that they falsely cry wolf over and over again?
.
|
|
|
| User: "___________" |
|
| Title: Re: Wiil Bush and Blair swear, under oath, that they didn't fix intelligence? |
08 Jun 2005 05:40:19 PM |
|
|
"Joe Lunchpail" <joelunchpail2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1118257775.945563.277290@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Will liberals ever admit that they falsely cry wolf over and over again?
Sure. On the same day that Bushcultists make the same admission.
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
"I swear to God, they wouldn't pay me if they knew how much fun this was.". "I Swear to Upturn and Rear End the Constitution of the United States..." "You did not... swear to uphold the Bible" Right wing: You must swear allegiance to Bush-Cheney WTF!!! - Senate chooses NOT to swear in Gonzalez before testimony Senator Kennedy, do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? How Bush and Rumsfeld Plan to Steal Soldiers' Votes. What? Ya didn't think they would? WHEN UK WERE THERE WHY DIDN'T THEY HAVE SUCCESS? They speak English don't they?
| Re: They didn't just lie about Iraq Whoops! First they say he knew, then they say he didn't know, then they say they don't know if he knew.. THE DemocRATS WON THE LAST ELECTION, DIDN'T THEY. THE DemocRATS HAVE BEEN IN POWER SINCE THE BEGINNING OF 2007, HAVEN'T THEY. BUSH IS NOW A MEANINGLESS LAME DUCK PRESIDENT, ISN'T HE. Why didn't they take Zarqawi ALIVE??? Well, they finally found GW Bush's missing service records didn't they? They didn't dress up in a flight suit or strut across a carrier deck. Hospital Officials, Family Struggle With Boy's Fate: Child ProtectiveServices would be taking custody if they didn't take him home to Mexico.
|
|
|