Women Must Have No Reproductive Rights Over Their Own Bodies If They Are To Be Truly Free



 Politics > Politics-USA > Women Must Have No Reproductive Rights Over Their Own Bodies If They Are To Be Truly Free

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Lady Freedom"
Date: 18 Mar 2006 06:20:57 PM
Object: Women Must Have No Reproductive Rights Over Their Own Bodies If They Are To Be Truly Free
History shows that Libertarians and Conservatives alike are right when we
contend that women must not have reproductive rights over their own bodies. In
fact, women in societies that enjoy true libertay and freedom must adhere to a
strict code where they become mothers of the children who will one day begat
childern themselves. It's only in opressive socialistic societies like
Sweden, Australia, France and England that they have no freedom. Our
government is protecting us from ourselves when they move to outlaw abortion
once and for all.
Throughout history, ideas about women's bodies have been used to reinforce and,
occasionally, to challenge women's social position. We should thank God for
every day we have Bush as our President.
Circa 1800 B.C. The Code of Hammurabi-the earliest recorded legal system in the
western world-defines women's bodies as men's property and defines rape as a
property crime. Under this Code, convicted rapists must pay fines for "damaged
goods" to the raped woman's husband or father (if she is unmarried).
4th century B.C. The Greek philosopher Aristotle contends that embryos become
female only if they have insufficient "heat" to become fully human. Thus all
females are "misbegotten men" and "monstrosities." Other Greek scholars extend
these ideas, declaring that lack of heat makes women smaller, frailer, less
intelligent, emotionally weak, morally suspect, and, as a result, a danger to
men.
Early Christian era Like the Greeks who precede them, early Christian
philosophers conclude that women's presumed moral weaknesses endanger any men
who come under their spell. For centuries thereafter, Christian theologians
argue that Eve succumbed to the snake's tempting and caused the fall from divine
grace because women's nature makes them inherently more susceptible to sexual
desire and other passions of the flesh, blinding them to reason and morality and
making them a constant danger to men's souls.
14th to 18th centuries The Christian belief that women are less intelligent than
men, more driven by sexual passions, and hence more susceptible to the Devil's
blandishments undergirds the killings of tens of thousands of innocent women
accused of witchcraft in Europe and America.
17th century Slavery takes root in colonial North America. Both the law and
scientists regard African-American women (and men) as less-than-human property.
As a result, the rape of African-American women slaves by their white masters
becomes an accepted (if rarely discussed) practice, justified by ideologies that
absolve white rapists of guilt by declaring African-American women
animalistically over-sexed temptresses. This racist belief continues to be used
as a justification by white rapists throughout the twentieth century.
1769 English legal theorist, Sir William Blackstone, publishes his encyclopedic
codification of existing English law. According to Blackstone, women experience
"civil death" in marriage, and their husbands gain total rights and
responsibilities over their wives' bodies and lives. Consequently, husbands have
the legal right to beat or rape their wives-a right that will survive for more
than two centuries.
1776 The new United States of America adopts Blackstone's principles as the
basis of its legal code. White women and free African-American continue to be
treated under the law as if they are property, while African-American slave
women (and men) are property.
1872 Reflecting contemporary ideas about women's inherent weakness, Charles
Darwin, in his groundbreaking book On the Origin of the Species, argues, as part
of his theory of evolution, that only the fittest males succeed in gaining
sexual access to females and reproducing. As a result, males continually evolve
toward greater "perfection." Females, on the other hand, need not compete for
males. As a result, they have limited sex drive and, more importantly, can never
evolve fully. In addition, Darwin argues, the stress of reproduction deprives
women of the energy needed for either physical or mental development. As a resul
t, women remain subject to their emotions and passions: nurturing, altruistic,
and child-like, but with little sense of either justice or morality. These ideas
underlie social acceptance of "romantic friendships"--intense, passionate,
sometimes life-long, relationships between women who are presumed to be
heterosexual.
Late 19th to early 20th century Beliefs about women's physical and emotional
frailty are widely used as justifications for restricting women's rights to
vote, get an education, or hold professional jobs. Many educators argue that
higher education will make women frigid, drain them of their beauty and health,
and prevent their pelvises from developing fully, causing women to suffer or
even die in childbirth. To "treat" women who become rebellious or depressed due
to their constricted roles, doctors surgically remove their ovaries, uteruses,
and clitorises in highly dangerous operations. Meanwhile, the same scientific
"experts" who lament the frailty of middle- and upper-class white women proclaim
the robustness of the poorer women - both white and non-white - who must perform
hard manual labor in fields, factories, and households.
1908 The U.S. Supreme Court, in Muller v. Oregon, upholds protective labor laws
that set maximum working hours and mandate rest periods for women. Although
designed to benefit women, these rules further reinforce the notion of female
frailty, extending that notion to poor women.
1920s-1930s As growing numbers of women receive higher educations and obtain
jobs that allow them to survive economically without marrying, those who remain
single and continue in "romantic friendships" become stigmatized as lesbians.
1950s to 1980s Disdain for and fear of female reproductive organs among doctors
(most of whom are male) continues in the twentieth century, and results in an
epidemic of unnecessary episiotomies, cesarean sections, hysterectomies, and
radical mastectomies. These numbers begin to taper off in the 1990s, but remain
far higher than those recommended by medical scholars or the World Health
Organization.
1960s to 1970s The "Second Wave" of feminism begins. Feminists argue that women
and men are morally, physically, and intellectually equal, and that the
differences between men and women are less important than the similarities. In
later years, some will argue that women's ability to create human life has made
them innately superior to men--more pacifistic, loving, moral, creative, and
ecologically inclined. In addition, some feminists will begin arguing that
lesbianism-women loving other women - is at least as "natural" as
heterosexuality.
1962 In Self v. Self, a U.S. court for the first time rules that men do not have
a right to beat their wives. However, women continue to face difficulties in
getting police and courts to protect them from spousal abuse, although some
communities have made great strides.
1973 A coalition of feminists, lawyers, and doctors succeed, in Roe v. Wade, in
winning the right to abortion for American women and giving women the right to
control their own bodies. This decision immediately sparks an anti-abortion
movement.
1970s to present In response to women's new rights, a backlash emerges that uses
ideas about women's bodies to reassert control over women's lives. Women are now
expected to be not only painfully thin, but muscular and buxom--qualities that
only can occur together if women spend time, money, and emotional energy on
cosmetic surgery, exercise, and diet. Meanwhile, doctors argue that women cannot
be trusted to behave rationally either because of PMS (if premenopausal) or
hormone deficiencies (if postmenopausal). And the anti-abortion movement
continues to press-often successfully-for legal restrictions on abortion,
arguing not only that abortion is murder but also that women are too emotionally
and physically frail to make their own decisions about abortion or to retain
their health following abortions.
1980s U.S. courts begin ruling that men do not have a right to rape their wives.
However, between 10 and 14% of women continue to experience marital rape, which
is rarely prosecuted.
1980s to present The concept of "fetal rights" emerges, which declares that the
fetus has rights that supercedes its mother's and that therefore the mother can
be treated as a "fetal container." As a result, women are arrested if they use
drugs during pregnancy (even if they have been denied treatment for addiction),
forced to have cesarean sections against their will if doctors declare it best,
and refused jobs by employers who prefer to have no women workers rather than to
make working conditions safe for all workers.
Today
Feminists continue to fight against the idea that women's minds and bodies are
inferior to men's and for the right of women to control their own bodies.
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.

User: "owl"

Title: Re: Women Must Have No Reproductive Rights Over Their Own Bodies If They Are To Be Truly Free 18 Mar 2006 06:50:39 PM
So in a hypothetical situation where you mother was raped and impregnated...
You are going to tell her she will be more free if the government mandates
her into a Gestation Slave.
Be sure and tell her that. It will magically *improve* your relationship
with her.
"Lady Freedom" <freedom@libertay.org> wrote in message
news:441ca5fa$0$11950$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com...

History shows that Libertarians and Conservatives alike are right when we
contend that women must not have reproductive rights over their own

bodies. In

fact, women in societies that enjoy true libertay and freedom must adhere

to a

strict code where they become mothers of the children who will one day

begat

childern themselves. It's only in opressive socialistic societies like
Sweden, Australia, France and England that they have no freedom. Our
government is protecting us from ourselves when they move to outlaw

abortion

once and for all.

Throughout history, ideas about women's bodies have been used to reinforce

and,

occasionally, to challenge women's social position. We should thank God

for

every day we have Bush as our President.


Circa 1800 B.C. The Code of Hammurabi-the earliest recorded legal system

in the

western world-defines women's bodies as men's property and defines rape as

a

property crime. Under this Code, convicted rapists must pay fines for

"damaged

goods" to the raped woman's husband or father (if she is unmarried).
4th century B.C. The Greek philosopher Aristotle contends that embryos

become

female only if they have insufficient "heat" to become fully human. Thus

all

females are "misbegotten men" and "monstrosities." Other Greek scholars

extend

these ideas, declaring that lack of heat makes women smaller, frailer,

less

intelligent, emotionally weak, morally suspect, and, as a result, a danger

to

men.
Early Christian era Like the Greeks who precede them, early Christian
philosophers conclude that women's presumed moral weaknesses endanger any

men

who come under their spell. For centuries thereafter, Christian

theologians

argue that Eve succumbed to the snake's tempting and caused the fall from

divine

grace because women's nature makes them inherently more susceptible to

sexual

desire and other passions of the flesh, blinding them to reason and

morality and

making them a constant danger to men's souls.
14th to 18th centuries The Christian belief that women are less

intelligent than

men, more driven by sexual passions, and hence more susceptible to the

Devil's

blandishments undergirds the killings of tens of thousands of innocent

women

accused of witchcraft in Europe and America.
17th century Slavery takes root in colonial North America. Both the law

and

scientists regard African-American women (and men) as less-than-human

property.

As a result, the rape of African-American women slaves by their white

masters

becomes an accepted (if rarely discussed) practice, justified by

ideologies that

absolve white rapists of guilt by declaring African-American women
animalistically over-sexed temptresses. This racist belief continues to be

used

as a justification by white rapists throughout the twentieth century.
1769 English legal theorist, Sir William Blackstone, publishes his

encyclopedic

codification of existing English law. According to Blackstone, women

experience

"civil death" in marriage, and their husbands gain total rights and
responsibilities over their wives' bodies and lives. Consequently,

husbands have

the legal right to beat or rape their wives-a right that will survive for

more

than two centuries.
1776 The new United States of America adopts Blackstone's principles as

the

basis of its legal code. White women and free African-American continue to

be

treated under the law as if they are property, while African-American

slave

women (and men) are property.
1872 Reflecting contemporary ideas about women's inherent weakness,

Charles

Darwin, in his groundbreaking book On the Origin of the Species, argues,

as part

of his theory of evolution, that only the fittest males succeed in gaining
sexual access to females and reproducing. As a result, males continually

evolve

toward greater "perfection." Females, on the other hand, need not compete

for

males. As a result, they have limited sex drive and, more importantly, can

never

evolve fully. In addition, Darwin argues, the stress of reproduction

deprives

women of the energy needed for either physical or mental development. As a

resul

t, women remain subject to their emotions and passions: nurturing,

altruistic,

and child-like, but with little sense of either justice or morality. These

ideas

underlie social acceptance of "romantic friendships"--intense, passionate,
sometimes life-long, relationships between women who are presumed to be
heterosexual.
Late 19th to early 20th century Beliefs about women's physical and

emotional

frailty are widely used as justifications for restricting women's rights

to

vote, get an education, or hold professional jobs. Many educators argue

that

higher education will make women frigid, drain them of their beauty and

health,

and prevent their pelvises from developing fully, causing women to suffer

or

even die in childbirth. To "treat" women who become rebellious or

depressed due

to their constricted roles, doctors surgically remove their ovaries,

uteruses,

and clitorises in highly dangerous operations. Meanwhile, the same

scientific

"experts" who lament the frailty of middle- and upper-class white women

proclaim

the robustness of the poorer women - both white and non-white - who must

perform

hard manual labor in fields, factories, and households.
1908 The U.S. Supreme Court, in Muller v. Oregon, upholds protective labor

laws

that set maximum working hours and mandate rest periods for women.

Although

designed to benefit women, these rules further reinforce the notion of

female

frailty, extending that notion to poor women.
1920s-1930s As growing numbers of women receive higher educations and

obtain

jobs that allow them to survive economically without marrying, those who

remain

single and continue in "romantic friendships" become stigmatized as

lesbians.

1950s to 1980s Disdain for and fear of female reproductive organs among

doctors

(most of whom are male) continues in the twentieth century, and results in

an

epidemic of unnecessary episiotomies, cesarean sections, hysterectomies,

and

radical mastectomies. These numbers begin to taper off in the 1990s, but

remain

far higher than those recommended by medical scholars or the World Health
Organization.
1960s to 1970s The "Second Wave" of feminism begins. Feminists argue that

women

and men are morally, physically, and intellectually equal, and that the
differences between men and women are less important than the

similarities. In

later years, some will argue that women's ability to create human life has

made

them innately superior to men--more pacifistic, loving, moral, creative,

and

ecologically inclined. In addition, some feminists will begin arguing that
lesbianism-women loving other women - is at least as "natural" as
heterosexuality.
1962 In Self v. Self, a U.S. court for the first time rules that men do

not have

a right to beat their wives. However, women continue to face difficulties

in

getting police and courts to protect them from spousal abuse, although

some

communities have made great strides.
1973 A coalition of feminists, lawyers, and doctors succeed, in Roe v.

Wade, in

winning the right to abortion for American women and giving women the

right to

control their own bodies. This decision immediately sparks an

anti-abortion

movement.
1970s to present In response to women's new rights, a backlash emerges

that uses

ideas about women's bodies to reassert control over women's lives. Women

are now

expected to be not only painfully thin, but muscular and buxom--qualities

that

only can occur together if women spend time, money, and emotional energy

on

cosmetic surgery, exercise, and diet. Meanwhile, doctors argue that women

cannot

be trusted to behave rationally either because of PMS (if premenopausal)

or

hormone deficiencies (if postmenopausal). And the anti-abortion movement
continues to press-often successfully-for legal restrictions on abortion,
arguing not only that abortion is murder but also that women are too

emotionally

and physically frail to make their own decisions about abortion or to

retain

their health following abortions.
1980s U.S. courts begin ruling that men do not have a right to rape their

wives.

However, between 10 and 14% of women continue to experience marital rape,

which

is rarely prosecuted.
1980s to present The concept of "fetal rights" emerges, which declares

that the

fetus has rights that supercedes its mother's and that therefore the

mother can

be treated as a "fetal container." As a result, women are arrested if they

use

drugs during pregnancy (even if they have been denied treatment for

addiction),

forced to have cesarean sections against their will if doctors declare it

best,

and refused jobs by employers who prefer to have no women workers rather

than to

make working conditions safe for all workers.
Today

Feminists continue to fight against the idea that women's minds and bodies

are

inferior to men's and for the right of women to control their own bodies.

*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from

http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: To the jobless people who blame Mexicans: Facts show Mexicans are MUY, MUY HEAVY welfare users. They often sit around watching Spanish-language tv as 'the government' $supports$ them and their infinite anchor babies
They lied their way into Iraq. Now they are trying to lie their way out.
librul reporters are disgusting - they are NOT seeking the news, but are instead pursuing their leftist agenda
Are Americans stupid? Some liberals think so, but they have their own problems with knowledge
"People are finding it difficult to afford to fill up their vehicles so they can get to and from work,"
are they putting te rope around their own necks or what ?
"The U.S. Military is demanding that thousands of wounded service personnel give back signing bonuses because they are unable to serve out their commitments."
Re: Wunderbar: UN approves holocaust day: Some precision on vocabulary. Don Black Ocean is just as much a genuine American Patriot as IQ45 Heinrich a German or Dutch Patriot: they are just blind racists as a compensation to their intellectual, moral
The Bushies are backing away from their lie. Yup. They've been exposed.
Re: Right wingers now say their administration is incompetent --GOP --Crooks, and Traitors (soon they will claim only McCain can clean upthe corruption... THERE ARE 10 SENATORS WHO PROVED THEIR HONESTY LAST WEEKVOTING AGAINST BUSH'S FASCIST "PATRIOT"
Democrats are notoriously unreliable voters in bad weather. Insteadof putting on galoshes and going to the polls, they sit on their porcheswaiting for FEMA to rescue them.
Re: WMDs have been found! their nicknalme are "Dubya" and "Tony Puddle"
Republicans are out shopping for minorities for their convention.
Here are some of Bush's buddies waiting for their share of our $87 billion.
Yup. The Right wing money hypocrites are shakin' in their boots.
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER