| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" |
| Date: |
24 Mar 2006 10:46:11 PM |
| Object: |
WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
Harsh words. I'm flabbergasted.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/matthews-rips-bush-for-misleading-nation-into-iraq-white-house-praises-matthews/
On “Imus In the Morning” earlier today, Chris Matthews ripped into
Bush’s handling of Iraq
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we were
avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to get them. … We
pursued the terrorists back to Iraq. And it’s all nonsense. The reason
there are terrorists in Iraq today like Zarqawi is we created the
opening by blowing the country apart. …
I mean the denial has been continuous. So you really can’t count on
the administration to tell you what is going on. That is just the
fact. You’ve got to check it out. By the way, the president said this
week that he wants the whole truth about what is going on in Iraq, the
whole truth and that the media isn’t telling the whole story. I’ll
tell you what we are not telling. We are not showing pictures of the
twenty five hundred bodies coming back because they won’t let us show
the pictures. They don’t want the whole truth out and that’s the fact.
.
|
|
| User: "Irving Layton" |
|
| Title: Re: WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
25 Mar 2006 02:33:48 AM |
|
|
"laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:qgi922h19mcclk6mvf27p64con187q6jc8@4ax.com...
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we were
avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to get them.
Now that's not true. Many of us knew the culprits were in Afghanistan.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "GOP is HISTORY" |
|
| Title: Re: WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
24 Mar 2006 11:25:23 PM |
|
|
"laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:qgi922h19mcclk6mvf27p64con187q6jc8@4ax.com...
Harsh words. I'm flabbergasted.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/matthews-rips-bush-for-misleading-nation-into-iraq-white-house-praises-matthews/
On "Imus In the Morning" earlier today, Chris Matthews ripped into
Bush's handling of Iraq
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we were
avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to get them. . We
pursued the terrorists back to Iraq. And it's all nonsense. The reason
there are terrorists in Iraq today like Zarqawi is we created the
opening by blowing the country apart. .
I mean the denial has been continuous. So you really can't count on
the administration to tell you what is going on. That is just the
fact. You've got to check it out. By the way, the president said this
week that he wants the whole truth about what is going on in Iraq, the
whole truth and that the media isn't telling the whole story. I'll
tell you what we are not telling. We are not showing pictures of the
twenty five hundred bodies coming back because they won't let us show
the pictures. They don't want the whole truth out and that's the fact.
It's about time the mainstream media began talking openly about the deceipt
that flows from that administration every. single .day!
.
|
|
|
| User: "£ - E A R T H L I N G Ƨ" |
|
| Title: Re: WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
25 Mar 2006 12:29:54 AM |
|
|
"GOP is HISTORY" <braindeadbush@aol.com> wrote in message
news:7v4Vf.8448$tN3.373@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:qgi922h19mcclk6mvf27p64con187q6jc8@4ax.com...
Harsh words. I'm flabbergasted.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/matthews-rips-bush-for-misleading-nation-into-iraq-white-house-praises-matthews/
On "Imus In the Morning" earlier today, Chris Matthews ripped into
Bush's handling of Iraq
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we were
avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to get them. . We
pursued the terrorists back to Iraq. And it's all nonsense. The reason
there are terrorists in Iraq today like Zarqawi is we created the
opening by blowing the country apart. .
I mean the denial has been continuous. So you really can't count on
the administration to tell you what is going on. That is just the
fact. You've got to check it out. By the way, the president said this
week that he wants the whole truth about what is going on in Iraq, the
whole truth and that the media isn't telling the whole story. I'll
tell you what we are not telling. We are not showing pictures of the
twenty five hundred bodies coming back because they won't let us show
the pictures. They don't want the whole truth out and that's the fact.
It's about time the mainstream media began talking openly about the
deceipt that flows from that administration every. single .day!
It's also amusing to see the Pugs eat their own and Bush blow up at an 84
year old woman's (Helen Thomas) innocent questions and Fox Fake News Lezzies
and drunks demonize her the following day.
Bush is a bully and a coward. Who needs Bush? Not Americans.
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOP is HISTORY" |
|
| Title: Re: WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
25 Mar 2006 07:58:14 AM |
|
|
"£ - E A R T H L I N G Ƨ" <never@bush.net> wrote in message
news:Cr5Vf.59827$Jd.35721@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
"GOP is HISTORY" <braindeadbush@aol.com> wrote in message
news:7v4Vf.8448$tN3.373@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:qgi922h19mcclk6mvf27p64con187q6jc8@4ax.com...
Harsh words. I'm flabbergasted.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/matthews-rips-bush-for-misleading-nation-into-iraq-white-house-praises-matthews/
On "Imus In the Morning" earlier today, Chris Matthews ripped into
Bush's handling of Iraq
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we were
avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to get them. . We
pursued the terrorists back to Iraq. And it's all nonsense. The reason
there are terrorists in Iraq today like Zarqawi is we created the
opening by blowing the country apart. .
I mean the denial has been continuous. So you really can't count on
the administration to tell you what is going on. That is just the
fact. You've got to check it out. By the way, the president said this
week that he wants the whole truth about what is going on in Iraq, the
whole truth and that the media isn't telling the whole story. I'll
tell you what we are not telling. We are not showing pictures of the
twenty five hundred bodies coming back because they won't let us show
the pictures. They don't want the whole truth out and that's the fact.
It's about time the mainstream media began talking openly about the
deceipt that flows from that administration every. single .day!
It's also amusing to see the Pugs eat their own and Bush blow up at an 84
year old woman's (Helen Thomas) innocent questions and Fox Fake News
Lezzies and drunks demonize her the following day.
Bush is a bully and a coward. Who needs Bush? Not Americans.
"Heaven doesn't want him and Hell's afraid he'll take over."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "can_o_worms" |
|
| Title: Re: WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
24 Mar 2006 11:27:06 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:46:11 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Harsh words. I'm flabbergasted.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/matthews-rips-bush-for-misleading-nation-into-iraq-white-house-praises-matthews/
On "Imus In the Morning" earlier today, Chris Matthews ripped into
Bush’s handling of Iraq
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we were
avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to get them. " We
pursued the terrorists back to Iraq. And it’s all nonsense. The reason
there are terrorists in Iraq today like Zarqawi is we created the
opening by blowing the country apart. "
I mean the denial has been continuous. So you really can’t count on
the administration to tell you what is going on. That is just the
fact. You’ve got to check it out. By the way, the president said this
week that he wants the whole truth about what is going on in Iraq, the
whole truth and that the media isn’t telling the whole story. I’ll
tell you what we are not telling. We are not showing pictures of the
twenty five hundred bodies coming back because they won’t let us show
the pictures. They don’t want the whole truth out and that’s the fact.
The reason you won't often hear him take a partisan position on
"Hardball" is because his position as an interviewer requires an
appearance of impartiality just as Tim Russert must assume.
He doesn't always stick to it but that non-partisan approach
must go with the territory of being an interviewer.
If you must criticize his approach on "Hardball": It should be
on the basis of softball interviews which he does sometimes.
People I'd like to see him pitch to harder include: James
Woolsey, John McCain, and Richard Perle but he still can't
quite assume the role of a hostile interviewer. I have seen
Russert pitch harder but Matthews still has a pretty interesting
tabloid-free show.
I always wonder if Hillary has ever been invited to be interviewed
on Hardball.....I'll bet she has and turned it down.
--
another choice:
www.lp.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOP is HISTORY" |
|
| Title: Re: WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
24 Mar 2006 11:47:26 PM |
|
|
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:2lj922pspkv0jn9r43ftd72t3g8d51847g@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:46:11 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Harsh words. I'm flabbergasted.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/matthews-rips-bush-for-misleading-nation-into-iraq-white-house-praises-matthews/
On "Imus In the Morning" earlier today, Chris Matthews ripped into
Bush's handling of Iraq
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we were
avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to get them. " We
pursued the terrorists back to Iraq. And it's all nonsense. The reason
there are terrorists in Iraq today like Zarqawi is we created the
opening by blowing the country apart. "
I mean the denial has been continuous. So you really can't count on
the administration to tell you what is going on. That is just the
fact. You've got to check it out. By the way, the president said this
week that he wants the whole truth about what is going on in Iraq, the
whole truth and that the media isn't telling the whole story. I'll
tell you what we are not telling. We are not showing pictures of the
twenty five hundred bodies coming back because they won't let us show
the pictures. They don't want the whole truth out and that's the fact.
The reason you won't often hear him take a partisan position on
"Hardball" is because his position as an interviewer requires an
appearance of impartiality just as Tim Russert must assume.
He doesn't always stick to it but that non-partisan approach
must go with the territory of being an interviewer.
If you must criticize his approach on "Hardball": It should be
on the basis of softball interviews which he does sometimes.
People I'd like to see him pitch to harder include: James
Woolsey, John McCain, and Richard Perle but he still can't
quite assume the role of a hostile interviewer. I have seen
Russert pitch harder but Matthews still has a pretty interesting
tabloid-free show.
It's great to watch Chris Matthews, but he has an annoying habit of
interrupting his guests before they have a chance to finish their thought.
It's one thing to keep the show moving along, but sometimes it seems like he
just likes to hear himself talk.
I always wonder if Hillary has ever been invited to be interviewed
on Hardball.....I'll bet she has and turned it down.
If she appears on Hardball you can bet she'll be running in '08. IMHO.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Winston Smith, American Patriot" |
|
| Title: Re: WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
25 Mar 2006 12:08:17 AM |
|
|
"GOP is HISTORY" <braindeadbush@aol.com> wrote in alt.politics.bush:
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:2lj922pspkv0jn9r43ftd72t3g8d51847g@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:46:11 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Harsh words. I'm flabbergasted.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/matthews-rips-bush-for-misleading-
nation-into-iraq-white-house-praises-matthews/
On "Imus In the Morning" earlier today, Chris Matthews ripped into
Bush's handling of Iraq
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we were
avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to get them. "
We pursued the terrorists back to Iraq. And it's all nonsense. The
reason there are terrorists in Iraq today like Zarqawi is we created
the opening by blowing the country apart. "
I mean the denial has been continuous. So you really can't count on
the administration to tell you what is going on. That is just the
fact. You've got to check it out. By the way, the president said this
week that he wants the whole truth about what is going on in Iraq,
the whole truth and that the media isn't telling the whole story.
I'll tell you what we are not telling. We are not showing pictures of
the twenty five hundred bodies coming back because they won't let us
show the pictures. They don't want the whole truth out and that's the
fact.
The reason you won't often hear him take a partisan position on
"Hardball" is because his position as an interviewer requires an
appearance of impartiality just as Tim Russert must assume.
He doesn't always stick to it but that non-partisan approach
must go with the territory of being an interviewer.
If you must criticize his approach on "Hardball": It should be
on the basis of softball interviews which he does sometimes.
People I'd like to see him pitch to harder include: James
Woolsey, John McCain, and Richard Perle but he still can't
quite assume the role of a hostile interviewer. I have seen
Russert pitch harder but Matthews still has a pretty interesting
tabloid-free show.
It's great to watch Chris Matthews, but he has an annoying habit of
interrupting his guests before they have a chance to finish their
thought. It's one thing to keep the show moving along, but sometimes
it seems like he just likes to hear himself talk.
Matthews is almost certainly a manic on medication.
In most of the minutes he's broadcasting, he's an unquestioning,
obsequious sycophant.
Then every once in a blue moon, he'll start the show off
editorializing----in his usual outburst fashion---about something for
which he appears to have made a total flip-flop.
Some call Matthews inconsistent and won't watch him for that reason.
Others like this unpredictability with Matthews and tune in hoping that
he'll himself make the news with some outrageous cartwheel on a political
issue.
[ These observations are based on the last time I was able to watch
Matthews, which was mid-2004 before I left the United States (again). We
don't get MSNBC on this side of the planet, so Matthews could have morphed
into something completely different in that time.]
--
http://hume.realisticpolitics.com/
Estimate the worth of a man by how sincerely he greets you.
Arrive at the worth of a man by how he opens himself to you.
Know the worth of a man by how conscientiously he listens to you.
Verify the worth of a man by how warmly he takes his leave of you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOP is HISTORY" |
|
| Title: Re: WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
25 Mar 2006 08:02:28 AM |
|
|
"Winston Smith, American Patriot" <FranzKafka@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV> wrote
in message news:Xns979152C8EDE8CWSAP1960@207.115.17.102...
"GOP is HISTORY" <braindeadbush@aol.com> wrote in alt.politics.bush:
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:2lj922pspkv0jn9r43ftd72t3g8d51847g@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:46:11 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Harsh words. I'm flabbergasted.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/matthews-rips-bush-for-misleading-
nation-into-iraq-white-house-praises-matthews/
On "Imus In the Morning" earlier today, Chris Matthews ripped into
Bush's handling of Iraq
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we were
avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to get them. "
We pursued the terrorists back to Iraq. And it's all nonsense. The
reason there are terrorists in Iraq today like Zarqawi is we created
the opening by blowing the country apart. "
I mean the denial has been continuous. So you really can't count on
the administration to tell you what is going on. That is just the
fact. You've got to check it out. By the way, the president said this
week that he wants the whole truth about what is going on in Iraq,
the whole truth and that the media isn't telling the whole story.
I'll tell you what we are not telling. We are not showing pictures of
the twenty five hundred bodies coming back because they won't let us
show the pictures. They don't want the whole truth out and that's the
fact.
The reason you won't often hear him take a partisan position on
"Hardball" is because his position as an interviewer requires an
appearance of impartiality just as Tim Russert must assume.
He doesn't always stick to it but that non-partisan approach
must go with the territory of being an interviewer.
If you must criticize his approach on "Hardball": It should be
on the basis of softball interviews which he does sometimes.
People I'd like to see him pitch to harder include: James
Woolsey, John McCain, and Richard Perle but he still can't
quite assume the role of a hostile interviewer. I have seen
Russert pitch harder but Matthews still has a pretty interesting
tabloid-free show.
It's great to watch Chris Matthews, but he has an annoying habit of
interrupting his guests before they have a chance to finish their
thought. It's one thing to keep the show moving along, but sometimes
it seems like he just likes to hear himself talk.
Matthews is almost certainly a manic on medication.
In most of the minutes he's broadcasting, he's an unquestioning,
obsequious sycophant.
Then every once in a blue moon, he'll start the show off
editorializing----in his usual outburst fashion---about something for
which he appears to have made a total flip-flop.
Some call Matthews inconsistent and won't watch him for that reason.
Others like this unpredictability with Matthews and tune in hoping that
he'll himself make the news with some outrageous cartwheel on a political
issue.
[ These observations are based on the last time I was able to watch
Matthews, which was mid-2004 before I left the United States (again). We
don't get MSNBC on this side of the planet, so Matthews could have morphed
into something completely different in that time.]
I stayed in Dubai last year and I have to honestly say I felt safer from
their government there than I do our government here.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "can_o_worms" |
|
| Title: Re: WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
25 Mar 2006 12:29:06 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 05:47:26 GMT, "GOP is HISTORY"
<braindeadbush@aol.com> wrote:
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:2lj922pspkv0jn9r43ftd72t3g8d51847g@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:46:11 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Harsh words. I'm flabbergasted.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/matthews-rips-bush-for-misleading-nation-into-iraq-white-house-praises-matthews/
On "Imus In the Morning" earlier today, Chris Matthews ripped into
Bush's handling of Iraq
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we were
avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to get them. " We
pursued the terrorists back to Iraq. And it's all nonsense. The reason
there are terrorists in Iraq today like Zarqawi is we created the
opening by blowing the country apart. "
I mean the denial has been continuous. So you really can't count on
the administration to tell you what is going on. That is just the
fact. You've got to check it out. By the way, the president said this
week that he wants the whole truth about what is going on in Iraq, the
whole truth and that the media isn't telling the whole story. I'll
tell you what we are not telling. We are not showing pictures of the
twenty five hundred bodies coming back because they won't let us show
the pictures. They don't want the whole truth out and that's the fact.
The reason you won't often hear him take a partisan position on
"Hardball" is because his position as an interviewer requires an
appearance of impartiality just as Tim Russert must assume.
He doesn't always stick to it but that non-partisan approach
must go with the territory of being an interviewer.
If you must criticize his approach on "Hardball": It should be
on the basis of softball interviews which he does sometimes.
People I'd like to see him pitch to harder include: James
Woolsey, John McCain, and Richard Perle
Oh yeah, and in retrospect much tougher interviews with Judith Miller
would have been interesting. He has had a lot of shills for the war on
his show and asks the questions alright but doesn't always press like
I wish he could or would.....But who was to know that Miller was a
Rendon Group (CIA subcontractor) propagandist for the war.
but he still can't
quite assume the role of a hostile interviewer. I have seen
Russert pitch harder but Matthews still has a pretty interesting
tabloid-free show.
It's great to watch Chris Matthews, but he has an annoying habit of
interrupting his guests before they have a chance to finish their thought.
It's one thing to keep the show moving along, but sometimes it seems like he
just likes to hear himself talk.
Goes with having your own show I guess. Probably a burnout to do
really tough interviews daily. Russert has all week to prepare.
I always wonder if Hillary has ever been invited to be interviewed
on Hardball.....I'll bet she has and turned it down.
If she appears on Hardball you can bet she'll be running in '08. IMHO.
Oh, she's running alright......with over $21 million in campaign
donations in the bank already. But either Matthews or Russert
would be sure to expose her as an Iran-war hawk immediately.
http://www.amconmag.com/2006/2006_03_27/cover.html
--
another choice:
www.lp.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOP is HISTORY" |
|
| Title: Re: WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
25 Mar 2006 08:06:20 AM |
|
|
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:snn922hpe3bl3toptejq3uiqhho9hc0cjf@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 05:47:26 GMT, "GOP is HISTORY"
<braindeadbush@aol.com> wrote:
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:2lj922pspkv0jn9r43ftd72t3g8d51847g@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:46:11 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Harsh words. I'm flabbergasted.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/matthews-rips-bush-for-misleading-nation-into-iraq-white-house-praises-matthews/
On "Imus In the Morning" earlier today, Chris Matthews ripped into
Bush's handling of Iraq
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we were
avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to get them. " We
pursued the terrorists back to Iraq. And it's all nonsense. The reason
there are terrorists in Iraq today like Zarqawi is we created the
opening by blowing the country apart. "
I mean the denial has been continuous. So you really can't count on
the administration to tell you what is going on. That is just the
fact. You've got to check it out. By the way, the president said this
week that he wants the whole truth about what is going on in Iraq, the
whole truth and that the media isn't telling the whole story. I'll
tell you what we are not telling. We are not showing pictures of the
twenty five hundred bodies coming back because they won't let us show
the pictures. They don't want the whole truth out and that's the fact.
The reason you won't often hear him take a partisan position on
"Hardball" is because his position as an interviewer requires an
appearance of impartiality just as Tim Russert must assume.
He doesn't always stick to it but that non-partisan approach
must go with the territory of being an interviewer.
If you must criticize his approach on "Hardball": It should be
on the basis of softball interviews which he does sometimes.
People I'd like to see him pitch to harder include: James
Woolsey, John McCain, and Richard Perle
Oh yeah, and in retrospect much tougher interviews with Judith Miller
would have been interesting. He has had a lot of shills for the war on
his show and asks the questions alright but doesn't always press like
I wish he could or would.....But who was to know that Miller was a
Rendon Group (CIA subcontractor) propagandist for the war.
but he still can't
quite assume the role of a hostile interviewer. I have seen
Russert pitch harder but Matthews still has a pretty interesting
tabloid-free show.
It's great to watch Chris Matthews, but he has an annoying habit of
interrupting his guests before they have a chance to finish their thought.
It's one thing to keep the show moving along, but sometimes it seems like
he
just likes to hear himself talk.
Goes with having your own show I guess. Probably a burnout to do
really tough interviews daily. Russert has all week to prepare.
He'd have to talk less if he'd listen more.
I always wonder if Hillary has ever been invited to be interviewed
on Hardball.....I'll bet she has and turned it down.
If she appears on Hardball you can bet she'll be running in '08. IMHO.
Oh, she's running alright......with over $21 million in campaign
donations in the bank already. But either Matthews or Russert
would be sure to expose her as an Iran-war hawk immediately.
http://www.amconmag.com/2006/2006_03_27/cover.html
I thought Conservatives were the hawks. Do you object to war with Iran in
general, or to Hillary being the President that bombs them?
--
another choice:
www.lp.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "can_o_worms" |
|
| Title: Re: WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
25 Mar 2006 01:19:05 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:06:20 GMT, "GOP is HISTORY"
<braindeadbush@aol.com> wrote:
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:snn922hpe3bl3toptejq3uiqhho9hc0cjf@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 05:47:26 GMT, "GOP is HISTORY"
<braindeadbush@aol.com> wrote:
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:2lj922pspkv0jn9r43ftd72t3g8d51847g@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:46:11 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Harsh words. I'm flabbergasted.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/matthews-rips-bush-for-misleading-nation-into-iraq-white-house-praises-matthews/
On "Imus In the Morning" earlier today, Chris Matthews ripped into
Bush's handling of Iraq
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we were
avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to get them. " We
pursued the terrorists back to Iraq. And it's all nonsense. The reason
there are terrorists in Iraq today like Zarqawi is we created the
opening by blowing the country apart. "
I mean the denial has been continuous. So you really can't count on
the administration to tell you what is going on. That is just the
fact. You've got to check it out. By the way, the president said this
week that he wants the whole truth about what is going on in Iraq, the
whole truth and that the media isn't telling the whole story. I'll
tell you what we are not telling. We are not showing pictures of the
twenty five hundred bodies coming back because they won't let us show
the pictures. They don't want the whole truth out and that's the fact.
The reason you won't often hear him take a partisan position on
"Hardball" is because his position as an interviewer requires an
appearance of impartiality just as Tim Russert must assume.
He doesn't always stick to it but that non-partisan approach
must go with the territory of being an interviewer.
If you must criticize his approach on "Hardball": It should be
on the basis of softball interviews which he does sometimes.
People I'd like to see him pitch to harder include: James
Woolsey, John McCain, and Richard Perle
Oh yeah, and in retrospect much tougher interviews with Judith Miller
would have been interesting. He has had a lot of shills for the war on
his show and asks the questions alright but doesn't always press like
I wish he could or would.....But who was to know that Miller was a
Rendon Group (CIA subcontractor) propagandist for the war.
but he still can't
quite assume the role of a hostile interviewer. I have seen
Russert pitch harder but Matthews still has a pretty interesting
tabloid-free show.
It's great to watch Chris Matthews, but he has an annoying habit of
interrupting his guests before they have a chance to finish their thought.
It's one thing to keep the show moving along, but sometimes it seems like
he
just likes to hear himself talk.
Goes with having your own show I guess. Probably a burnout to do
really tough interviews daily. Russert has all week to prepare.
He'd have to talk less if he'd listen more.
I always wonder if Hillary has ever been invited to be interviewed
on Hardball.....I'll bet she has and turned it down.
If she appears on Hardball you can bet she'll be running in '08. IMHO.
Oh, she's running alright......with over $21 million in campaign
donations in the bank already. But either Matthews or Russert
would be sure to expose her as an Iran-war hawk immediately.
http://www.amconmag.com/2006/2006_03_27/cover.html
I thought Conservatives were the hawks. Do you object to war with Iran in
general, or to Hillary being the President that bombs them?
I object to initiating an Iran war.
Real Conservatives don't believe in either Wilsonian nation building
projects or carrying water for Israel by wasting American patrimony
in expensive regime change agendas in Israel's behalf......Obviously
real Conservatives are a little short on the ground nowadays.
--
another choice:
www.lp.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOP is HISTORY" |
|
| Title: Re: WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
25 Mar 2006 01:58:19 PM |
|
|
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:kd5b22pmuek0ceekmpacp9ivlcn1pdlk07@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:06:20 GMT, "GOP is HISTORY"
<braindeadbush@aol.com> wrote:
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:snn922hpe3bl3toptejq3uiqhho9hc0cjf@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 05:47:26 GMT, "GOP is HISTORY"
<braindeadbush@aol.com> wrote:
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:2lj922pspkv0jn9r43ftd72t3g8d51847g@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:46:11 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Harsh words. I'm flabbergasted.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/matthews-rips-bush-for-misleading-nation-into-iraq-white-house-praises-matthews/
On "Imus In the Morning" earlier today, Chris Matthews ripped into
Bush's handling of Iraq
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we were
avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to get them. " We
pursued the terrorists back to Iraq. And it's all nonsense. The reason
there are terrorists in Iraq today like Zarqawi is we created the
opening by blowing the country apart. "
I mean the denial has been continuous. So you really can't count on
the administration to tell you what is going on. That is just the
fact. You've got to check it out. By the way, the president said this
week that he wants the whole truth about what is going on in Iraq, the
whole truth and that the media isn't telling the whole story. I'll
tell you what we are not telling. We are not showing pictures of the
twenty five hundred bodies coming back because they won't let us show
the pictures. They don't want the whole truth out and that's the fact.
The reason you won't often hear him take a partisan position on
"Hardball" is because his position as an interviewer requires an
appearance of impartiality just as Tim Russert must assume.
He doesn't always stick to it but that non-partisan approach
must go with the territory of being an interviewer.
If you must criticize his approach on "Hardball": It should be
on the basis of softball interviews which he does sometimes.
People I'd like to see him pitch to harder include: James
Woolsey, John McCain, and Richard Perle
Oh yeah, and in retrospect much tougher interviews with Judith Miller
would have been interesting. He has had a lot of shills for the war on
his show and asks the questions alright but doesn't always press like
I wish he could or would.....But who was to know that Miller was a
Rendon Group (CIA subcontractor) propagandist for the war.
but he still can't
quite assume the role of a hostile interviewer. I have seen
Russert pitch harder but Matthews still has a pretty interesting
tabloid-free show.
It's great to watch Chris Matthews, but he has an annoying habit of
interrupting his guests before they have a chance to finish their
thought.
It's one thing to keep the show moving along, but sometimes it seems
like
he
just likes to hear himself talk.
Goes with having your own show I guess. Probably a burnout to do
really tough interviews daily. Russert has all week to prepare.
He'd have to talk less if he'd listen more.
I always wonder if Hillary has ever been invited to be interviewed
on Hardball.....I'll bet she has and turned it down.
If she appears on Hardball you can bet she'll be running in '08. IMHO.
Oh, she's running alright......with over $21 million in campaign
donations in the bank already. But either Matthews or Russert
would be sure to expose her as an Iran-war hawk immediately.
http://www.amconmag.com/2006/2006_03_27/cover.html
I thought Conservatives were the hawks. Do you object to war with Iran in
general, or to Hillary being the President that bombs them?
I object to initiating an Iran war.
Real Conservatives don't believe in either Wilsonian nation building
projects or carrying water for Israel by wasting American patrimony
in expensive regime change agendas in Israel's behalf......
[Obviously real Conservatives are a little short on the ground nowadays.]
I've noticed that. And it looks like the rest of the country is waking to
that realization, too. Good luck ridding the GOP of the imposters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "can_o_worms" |
|
| Title: Re: WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
25 Mar 2006 02:36:02 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:58:19 GMT, "GOP is HISTORY"
<braindeadbush@aol.com> wrote:
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:kd5b22pmuek0ceekmpacp9ivlcn1pdlk07@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:06:20 GMT, "GOP is HISTORY"
<braindeadbush@aol.com> wrote:
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:snn922hpe3bl3toptejq3uiqhho9hc0cjf@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 05:47:26 GMT, "GOP is HISTORY"
<braindeadbush@aol.com> wrote:
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:2lj922pspkv0jn9r43ftd72t3g8d51847g@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:46:11 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Harsh words. I'm flabbergasted.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/matthews-rips-bush-for-misleading-nation-into-iraq-white-house-praises-matthews/
On "Imus In the Morning" earlier today, Chris Matthews ripped into
Bush's handling of Iraq
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we were
avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to get them. " We
pursued the terrorists back to Iraq. And it's all nonsense. The reason
there are terrorists in Iraq today like Zarqawi is we created the
opening by blowing the country apart. "
I mean the denial has been continuous. So you really can't count on
the administration to tell you what is going on. That is just the
fact. You've got to check it out. By the way, the president said this
week that he wants the whole truth about what is going on in Iraq, the
whole truth and that the media isn't telling the whole story. I'll
tell you what we are not telling. We are not showing pictures of the
twenty five hundred bodies coming back because they won't let us show
the pictures. They don't want the whole truth out and that's the fact.
The reason you won't often hear him take a partisan position on
"Hardball" is because his position as an interviewer requires an
appearance of impartiality just as Tim Russert must assume.
He doesn't always stick to it but that non-partisan approach
must go with the territory of being an interviewer.
If you must criticize his approach on "Hardball": It should be
on the basis of softball interviews which he does sometimes.
People I'd like to see him pitch to harder include: James
Woolsey, John McCain, and Richard Perle
Oh yeah, and in retrospect much tougher interviews with Judith Miller
would have been interesting. He has had a lot of shills for the war on
his show and asks the questions alright but doesn't always press like
I wish he could or would.....But who was to know that Miller was a
Rendon Group (CIA subcontractor) propagandist for the war.
but he still can't
quite assume the role of a hostile interviewer. I have seen
Russert pitch harder but Matthews still has a pretty interesting
tabloid-free show.
It's great to watch Chris Matthews, but he has an annoying habit of
interrupting his guests before they have a chance to finish their
thought.
It's one thing to keep the show moving along, but sometimes it seems
like
he
just likes to hear himself talk.
Goes with having your own show I guess. Probably a burnout to do
really tough interviews daily. Russert has all week to prepare.
He'd have to talk less if he'd listen more.
I always wonder if Hillary has ever been invited to be interviewed
on Hardball.....I'll bet she has and turned it down.
If she appears on Hardball you can bet she'll be running in '08. IMHO.
Oh, she's running alright......with over $21 million in campaign
donations in the bank already. But either Matthews or Russert
would be sure to expose her as an Iran-war hawk immediately.
http://www.amconmag.com/2006/2006_03_27/cover.html
I thought Conservatives were the hawks. Do you object to war with Iran in
general, or to Hillary being the President that bombs them?
I object to initiating an Iran war.
Real Conservatives don't believe in either Wilsonian nation building
projects or carrying water for Israel by wasting American patrimony
in expensive regime change agendas in Israel's behalf......
[Obviously real Conservatives are a little short on the ground nowadays.]
I've noticed that. And it looks like the rest of the country is waking to
that realization, too. Good luck ridding the GOP of the imposters.
Oh I wouldn't dare take on such a major task......That's Pat
Buchanan's job......I'm voting Libertarian nowadays.
I post sources from all sides of the political spectrum so long as
they don't warmonger.
--
another choice:
www.lp.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOP is HISTORY" |
|
| Title: Re: WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
25 Mar 2006 02:39:46 PM |
|
|
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:v4ab22dhbp8s4tlcv83i38ihpleq2op7ih@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:58:19 GMT, "GOP is HISTORY"
<braindeadbush@aol.com> wrote:
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:kd5b22pmuek0ceekmpacp9ivlcn1pdlk07@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:06:20 GMT, "GOP is HISTORY"
<braindeadbush@aol.com> wrote:
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:snn922hpe3bl3toptejq3uiqhho9hc0cjf@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 05:47:26 GMT, "GOP is HISTORY"
<braindeadbush@aol.com> wrote:
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:2lj922pspkv0jn9r43ftd72t3g8d51847g@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:46:11 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Harsh words. I'm flabbergasted.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/matthews-rips-bush-for-misleading-nation-into-iraq-white-house-praises-matthews/
On "Imus In the Morning" earlier today, Chris Matthews ripped into
Bush's handling of Iraq
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we were
avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to get them. "
We
pursued the terrorists back to Iraq. And it's all nonsense. The
reason
there are terrorists in Iraq today like Zarqawi is we created the
opening by blowing the country apart. "
I mean the denial has been continuous. So you really can't count on
the administration to tell you what is going on. That is just the
fact. You've got to check it out. By the way, the president said
this
week that he wants the whole truth about what is going on in Iraq,
the
whole truth and that the media isn't telling the whole story. I'll
tell you what we are not telling. We are not showing pictures of the
twenty five hundred bodies coming back because they won't let us
show
the pictures. They don't want the whole truth out and that's the
fact.
The reason you won't often hear him take a partisan position on
"Hardball" is because his position as an interviewer requires an
appearance of impartiality just as Tim Russert must assume.
He doesn't always stick to it but that non-partisan approach
must go with the territory of being an interviewer.
If you must criticize his approach on "Hardball": It should be
on the basis of softball interviews which he does sometimes.
People I'd like to see him pitch to harder include: James
Woolsey, John McCain, and Richard Perle
Oh yeah, and in retrospect much tougher interviews with Judith Miller
would have been interesting. He has had a lot of shills for the war on
his show and asks the questions alright but doesn't always press like
I wish he could or would.....But who was to know that Miller was a
Rendon Group (CIA subcontractor) propagandist for the war.
but he still can't
quite assume the role of a hostile interviewer. I have seen
Russert pitch harder but Matthews still has a pretty interesting
tabloid-free show.
It's great to watch Chris Matthews, but he has an annoying habit of
interrupting his guests before they have a chance to finish their
thought.
It's one thing to keep the show moving along, but sometimes it seems
like
he
just likes to hear himself talk.
Goes with having your own show I guess. Probably a burnout to do
really tough interviews daily. Russert has all week to prepare.
He'd have to talk less if he'd listen more.
I always wonder if Hillary has ever been invited to be interviewed
on Hardball.....I'll bet she has and turned it down.
If she appears on Hardball you can bet she'll be running in '08.
IMHO.
Oh, she's running alright......with over $21 million in campaign
donations in the bank already. But either Matthews or Russert
would be sure to expose her as an Iran-war hawk immediately.
http://www.amconmag.com/2006/2006_03_27/cover.html
I thought Conservatives were the hawks. Do you object to war with Iran
in
general, or to Hillary being the President that bombs them?
I object to initiating an Iran war.
Real Conservatives don't believe in either Wilsonian nation building
projects or carrying water for Israel by wasting American patrimony
in expensive regime change agendas in Israel's behalf......
[Obviously real Conservatives are a little short on the ground
nowadays.]
I've noticed that. And it looks like the rest of the country is waking to
that realization, too. Good luck ridding the GOP of the imposters.
Oh I wouldn't dare take on such a major task......That's Pat
Buchanan's job......I'm voting Libertarian nowadays.
I post sources from all sides of the political spectrum so long as
they don't warmonger.
--
another choice:
www.lp.org
Sounds reasonable to me!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "What Me Worry?" |
|
| Title: Re: WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
25 Mar 2006 03:38:06 AM |
|
|
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:snn922hpe3bl3toptejq3uiqhho9hc0cjf@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 05:47:26 GMT, "GOP is HISTORY"
<braindeadbush@aol.com> wrote:
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:2lj922pspkv0jn9r43ftd72t3g8d51847g@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:46:11 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Harsh words. I'm flabbergasted.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/matthews-rips-bush-for-misleading-nation-into-iraq-white-house-praises-matthews/
On "Imus In the Morning" earlier today, Chris Matthews ripped into
Bush's handling of Iraq
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we were
avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to get them. " We
pursued the terrorists back to Iraq. And it's all nonsense. The reason
there are terrorists in Iraq today like Zarqawi is we created the
opening by blowing the country apart. "
I mean the denial has been continuous. So you really can't count on
the administration to tell you what is going on. That is just the
fact. You've got to check it out. By the way, the president said this
week that he wants the whole truth about what is going on in Iraq, the
whole truth and that the media isn't telling the whole story. I'll
tell you what we are not telling. We are not showing pictures of the
twenty five hundred bodies coming back because they won't let us show
the pictures. They don't want the whole truth out and that's the fact.
The reason you won't often hear him take a partisan position on
"Hardball" is because his position as an interviewer requires an
appearance of impartiality just as Tim Russert must assume.
He doesn't always stick to it but that non-partisan approach
must go with the territory of being an interviewer.
If you must criticize his approach on "Hardball": It should be
on the basis of softball interviews which he does sometimes.
People I'd like to see him pitch to harder include: James
Woolsey, John McCain, and Richard Perle
Oh yeah, and in retrospect much tougher interviews with Judith Miller
would have been interesting. He has had a lot of shills for the war on
his show and asks the questions alright but doesn't always press like
I wish he could or would.....But who was to know that Miller was a
Rendon Group (CIA subcontractor) propagandist for the war.
Are you kidding? It was *incredibly obvious* simply by reading Miller's
unashamedly yellow journalism leading up to the Iraq invasion. Progressive
journalists figured it out instantly. Of course, GOP propagandists like
Limbaugh shouted them down, calling them every damning epithet they could
muster. As usual, in the end we find out that, yeah, the progressives had
it all figured out from the get-go, and as usual, the GOP are lying their
asses off to destroy democracy in the US, replacing it with propaganda,
disinfo, domestic spying, illegal invasions, militarism, repression of civil
rights, judicial activism, executive abuse, etc, etc.
It absolutely *amazes* me that anybody still supports Bush. I guess there
must be millions of Americans with Head Up ***** Syndrome
but he still can't
quite assume the role of a hostile interviewer. I have seen
Russert pitch harder but Matthews still has a pretty interesting
tabloid-free show.
It's great to watch Chris Matthews, but he has an annoying habit of
interrupting his guests before they have a chance to finish their thought.
It's one thing to keep the show moving along, but sometimes it seems like
he
just likes to hear himself talk.
Goes with having your own show I guess. Probably a burnout to do
really tough interviews daily. Russert has all week to prepare.
Sounds more like a personality disorder to me...
I always wonder if Hillary has ever been invited to be interviewed
on Hardball.....I'll bet she has and turned it down.
If she appears on Hardball you can bet she'll be running in '08. IMHO.
Oh, she's running alright......with over $21 million in campaign
donations in the bank already. But either Matthews or Russert
would be sure to expose her as an Iran-war hawk immediately.
http://www.amconmag.com/2006/2006_03_27/cover.html
She's shooting a party line straight down the middle. It's an interesting
gambit. Could backfire, could turn into a landslide victory. If she comes
off as tough, smart, populist and anti-corruption she could clean the GOP's
clock in 2008. I think the Clinton-Obama ticket would be an unstoppable
juggernaut. Obama is the most promising Democrat since JFK. He's a
natural.
I'm planning to spend a lot of money and time to get Clinton elected. It
won't erase the catastrophic damage wrought by Bush's neofascist cabal; but
it would mean 8 years of progress climbing out of the fiscal canyon that
Bush dug for us.
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOP is HISTORY" |
|
| Title: Re: WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
25 Mar 2006 08:10:13 AM |
|
|
"What Me Worry?" <__@____.___> wrote in message
news:2c8Vf.639280$084.385447@attbi_s22...
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:snn922hpe3bl3toptejq3uiqhho9hc0cjf@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 05:47:26 GMT, "GOP is HISTORY"
<braindeadbush@aol.com> wrote:
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:2lj922pspkv0jn9r43ftd72t3g8d51847g@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:46:11 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Harsh words. I'm flabbergasted.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/matthews-rips-bush-for-misleading-nation-into-iraq-white-house-praises-matthews/
On "Imus In the Morning" earlier today, Chris Matthews ripped into
Bush's handling of Iraq
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we were
avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to get them. " We
pursued the terrorists back to Iraq. And it's all nonsense. The reason
there are terrorists in Iraq today like Zarqawi is we created the
opening by blowing the country apart. "
I mean the denial has been continuous. So you really can't count on
the administration to tell you what is going on. That is just the
fact. You've got to check it out. By the way, the president said this
week that he wants the whole truth about what is going on in Iraq, the
whole truth and that the media isn't telling the whole story. I'll
tell you what we are not telling. We are not showing pictures of the
twenty five hundred bodies coming back because they won't let us show
the pictures. They don't want the whole truth out and that's the fact.
The reason you won't often hear him take a partisan position on
"Hardball" is because his position as an interviewer requires an
appearance of impartiality just as Tim Russert must assume.
He doesn't always stick to it but that non-partisan approach
must go with the territory of being an interviewer.
If you must criticize his approach on "Hardball": It should be
on the basis of softball interviews which he does sometimes.
People I'd like to see him pitch to harder include: James
Woolsey, John McCain, and Richard Perle
Oh yeah, and in retrospect much tougher interviews with Judith Miller
would have been interesting. He has had a lot of shills for the war on
his show and asks the questions alright but doesn't always press like
I wish he could or would.....But who was to know that Miller was a
Rendon Group (CIA subcontractor) propagandist for the war.
Are you kidding? It was *incredibly obvious* simply by reading Miller's
unashamedly yellow journalism leading up to the Iraq invasion.
Progressive journalists figured it out instantly. Of course, GOP
propagandists like Limbaugh shouted them down, calling them every damning
epithet they could muster. As usual, in the end we find out that, yeah,
the progressives had it all figured out from the get-go, and as usual, the
GOP are lying their asses off to destroy democracy in the US, replacing it
with propaganda, disinfo, domestic spying, illegal invasions, militarism,
repression of civil rights, judicial activism, executive abuse, etc, etc.
It absolutely *amazes* me that anybody still supports Bush. I guess there
must be millions of Americans with Head Up ***** Syndrome
but he still can't
quite assume the role of a hostile interviewer. I have seen
Russert pitch harder but Matthews still has a pretty interesting
tabloid-free show.
It's great to watch Chris Matthews, but he has an annoying habit of
interrupting his guests before they have a chance to finish their
thought.
It's one thing to keep the show moving along, but sometimes it seems like
he
just likes to hear himself talk.
Goes with having your own show I guess. Probably a burnout to do
really tough interviews daily. Russert has all week to prepare.
Sounds more like a personality disorder to me...
I always wonder if Hillary has ever been invited to be interviewed
on Hardball.....I'll bet she has and turned it down.
If she appears on Hardball you can bet she'll be running in '08. IMHO.
Oh, she's running alright......with over $21 million in campaign
donations in the bank already. But either Matthews or Russert
would be sure to expose her as an Iran-war hawk immediately.
http://www.amconmag.com/2006/2006_03_27/cover.html
She's shooting a party line straight down the middle. It's an interesting
gambit. Could backfire, could turn into a landslide victory. If she
comes off as tough, smart, populist and anti-corruption she could clean
the GOP's clock in 2008. I think the Clinton-Obama ticket would be an
unstoppable juggernaut. Obama is the most promising Democrat since JFK.
He's a natural.
I'm planning to spend a lot of money and time to get Clinton elected. It
won't erase the catastrophic damage wrought by Bush's neofascist cabal;
but it would mean 8 years of progress climbing out of the fiscal canyon
that Bush dug for us.
HERE! HERE! Imagine Bill being Secretary of State, Robert Rubin being
Secretary of Treasury, Al Gore being head of the EPA, and the BUSH/CHENEY
administration being in Leavenworth!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "can_o_worms" |
|
| Title: Re: WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
25 Mar 2006 01:11:15 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 09:38:06 GMT, "What Me Worry?" <__@____.___>
wrote:
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:snn922hpe3bl3toptejq3uiqhho9hc0cjf@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 05:47:26 GMT, "GOP is HISTORY"
<braindeadbush@aol.com> wrote:
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:2lj922pspkv0jn9r43ftd72t3g8d51847g@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:46:11 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Harsh words. I'm flabbergasted.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/matthews-rips-bush-for-misleading-nation-into-iraq-white-house-praises-matthews/
On "Imus In the Morning" earlier today, Chris Matthews ripped into
Bush's handling of Iraq
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we were
avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to get them. " We
pursued the terrorists back to Iraq. And it's all nonsense. The reason
there are terrorists in Iraq today like Zarqawi is we created the
opening by blowing the country apart. "
I mean the denial has been continuous. So you really can't count on
the administration to tell you what is going on. That is just the
fact. You've got to check it out. By the way, the president said this
week that he wants the whole truth about what is going on in Iraq, the
whole truth and that the media isn't telling the whole story. I'll
tell you what we are not telling. We are not showing pictures of the
twenty five hundred bodies coming back because they won't let us show
the pictures. They don't want the whole truth out and that's the fact.
The reason you won't often hear him take a partisan position on
"Hardball" is because his position as an interviewer requires an
appearance of impartiality just as Tim Russert must assume.
He doesn't always stick to it but that non-partisan approach
must go with the territory of being an interviewer.
If you must criticize his approach on "Hardball": It should be
on the basis of softball interviews which he does sometimes.
People I'd like to see him pitch to harder include: James
Woolsey, John McCain, and Richard Perle
Oh yeah, and in retrospect much tougher interviews with Judith Miller
would have been interesting. He has had a lot of shills for the war on
his show and asks the questions alright but doesn't always press like
I wish he could or would.....But who was to know that Miller was a
Rendon Group (CIA subcontractor) propagandist for the war.
Are you kidding? It was *incredibly obvious* simply by reading Miller's
unashamedly yellow journalism leading up to the Iraq invasion. Progressive
journalists figured it out instantly. Of course, GOP propagandists like
Limbaugh shouted them down, calling them every damning epithet they could
muster. As usual, in the end we find out that, yeah, the progressives had
it all figured out from the get-go, and as usual, the GOP are lying their
asses off to destroy democracy in the US, replacing it with propaganda,
disinfo, domestic spying, illegal invasions, militarism, repression of civil
rights, judicial activism, executive abuse, etc, etc.
It absolutely *amazes* me that anybody still supports Bush. I guess there
must be millions of Americans with Head Up ***** Syndrome
but he still can't
quite assume the role of a hostile interviewer. I have seen
Russert pitch harder but Matthews still has a pretty interesting
tabloid-free show.
It's great to watch Chris Matthews, but he has an annoying habit of
interrupting his guests before they have a chance to finish their thought.
It's one thing to keep the show moving along, but sometimes it seems like
he
just likes to hear himself talk.
Goes with having your own show I guess. Probably a burnout to do
really tough interviews daily. Russert has all week to prepare.
Sounds more like a personality disorder to me...
I always wonder if Hillary has ever been invited to be interviewed
on Hardball.....I'll bet she has and turned it down.
If she appears on Hardball you can bet she'll be running in '08. IMHO.
Oh, she's running alright......with over $21 million in campaign
donations in the bank already. But either Matthews or Russert
would be sure to expose her as an Iran-war hawk immediately.
http://www.amconmag.com/2006/2006_03_27/cover.html
She's shooting a party line straight down the middle. It's an interesting
gambit. Could backfire, could turn into a landslide victory. If she comes
off as tough, smart, populist and anti-corruption she could clean the GOP's
clock in 2008. I think the Clinton-Obama ticket would be an unstoppable
juggernaut. Obama is the most promising Democrat since JFK. He's a
natural.
I'm planning to spend a lot of money and time to get Clinton elected. It
won't erase the catastrophic damage wrought by Bush's neofascist cabal; but
it would mean 8 years of progress climbing out of the fiscal canyon that
Bush dug for us.
Hillarius or Insane McCain mean to continue to disarm any possible
nuke threat to Israel with the last drop of American blood:
http://www.amconmag.com/2006/2006_03_27/cover.html
If I were a Democrat, I'd push for Feingold in the Primaries and
failing that: would vote Green or Libertarian in the General Election.
I sure as hell wouldn't ***** myself into voting for anyone who
signed off on the Iraq invasion as did Hillarius Clinton.......unless
you like perpetual Middle East wars.
--
another choice:
www.lp.org
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "gaffo" |
|
| Title: Re: WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
25 Mar 2006 11:17:40 AM |
|
|
What Me Worry? wrote:
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:snn922hpe3bl3toptejq3uiqhho9hc0cjf@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 05:47:26 GMT, "GOP is HISTORY"
<braindeadbush@aol.com> wrote:
"can_o_worms" <can_o_worms@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:2lj922pspkv0jn9r43ftd72t3g8d51847g@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:46:11 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR
HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Harsh words. I'm flabbergasted.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/matthews-rips-bush-for-mis
leading-nation-into-iraq-white-house-praises-matthews/
On "Imus In the Morning" earlier today, Chris Matthews ripped
into Bush's handling of Iraq
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we
were avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to
get them. " We pursued the terrorists back to Iraq. And it's
all nonsense. The reason there are terrorists in Iraq today
like Zarqawi is we created the opening by blowing the country
apart. "
I mean the denial has been continuous. So you really can't
count on the administration to tell you what is going on.
That is just the fact. You've got to check it out. By the
way, the president said this week that he wants the whole
truth about what is going on in Iraq, the whole truth and
that the media isn't telling the whole story. I'll tell you
what we are not telling. We are not showing pictures of the
twenty five hundred bodies coming back because they won't let
us show the pictures. They don't want the whole truth out and
that's the fact.
The reason you won't often hear him take a partisan position on
"Hardball" is because his position as an interviewer requires an
appearance of impartiality just as Tim Russert must assume.
He doesn't always stick to it but that non-partisan approach
must go with the territory of being an interviewer.
If you must criticize his approach on "Hardball": It should be
on the basis of softball interviews which he does sometimes.
People I'd like to see him pitch to harder include: James
Woolsey, John McCain, and Richard Perle
Oh yeah, and in retrospect much tougher interviews with Judith
Miller would have been interesting. He has had a lot of shills for
the war on his show and asks the questions alright but doesn't
always press like I wish he could or would.....But who was to know
that Miller was a Rendon Group (CIA subcontractor) propagandist for
the war.
Are you kidding? It was *incredibly obvious* simply by reading
Miller's unashamedly yellow journalism leading up to the Iraq
invasion. Progressive journalists figured it out instantly. Of
course, GOP propagandists like Limbaugh shouted them down, calling
them every damning epithet they could muster. As usual, in the end
we find out that, yeah, the progressives had it all figured out from
the get-go, and as usual, the GOP are lying their asses off to
destroy democracy in the US, replacing it with propaganda, disinfo,
domestic spying, illegal invasions, militarism, repression of civil
rights, judicial activism, executive abuse, etc, etc.
It absolutely amazes me that anybody still supports Bush. I guess
there must be millions of Americans with Head Up ***** Syndrome
but he still can't
quite assume the role of a hostile interviewer. I have seen
Russert pitch harder but Matthews still has a pretty interesting
tabloid-free show.
It's great to watch Chris Matthews, but he has an annoying habit
of interrupting his guests before they have a chance to finish
their thought. It's one thing to keep the show moving along, but
sometimes it seems like he just likes to hear himself talk.
Goes with having your own show I guess. Probably a burnout to do
really tough interviews daily. Russert has all week to prepare.
Sounds more like a personality disorder to me...
I always wonder if Hillary has ever been invited to be
interviewed on Hardball.....I'll bet she has and turned it down.
If she appears on Hardball you can bet she'll be running in '08.
IMHO.
Oh, she's running alright......with over $21 million in campaign
donations in the bank already. But either Matthews or Russert
would be sure to expose her as an Iran-war hawk immediately.
http://www.amconmag.com/2006/2006_03_27/cover.html
She's shooting a party line straight down the middle.
tying too - just like McCain from the other side.
It's an
interesting gambit. Could backfire,
it will for BOTH - McCain playing Religous Reich card has just lsot him
MY vote - along with millions of his base - the Independants. and his
own party never liked him to start with - so they will never vote for
him regardless of how religious he becomes. McCain just pissed his own
base away a few months ago.
likewise Hillary just pissed her liberal base away by trying to look
like a Republican and promoting flag burning baning amendment to the
Constitution. she will NEVER get the middle-to-conservative base of the
independants - and she - just like McCain just pissed away her Liberal
democratic base!
Both shot themselves in the foot and will not get any support from
anyone.
- sad, McCain could have taken the field and would have been a good
president. but he mande his choice and played the God game, so ***** him.
could turn into a landslide
victory. If she comes off as tough, smart, populist and
anti-corruption she could clean the GOP's clock in 2008.
nope - playing the lieberman card only gets you 8-percent of the dem.
vote.
I think the
Clinton-Obama ticket would be an unstoppable juggernaut. Obama is
the most promising Democrat since JFK. He's a natural.
"promising" - exactly. thats not enough - he needs 10 more yrs in
congress to be a viable anything! nationally. JFK was a congressman for
at lest a decade before he ran for president - and then it was the
second closest election in history.
get real.
I'm planning to spend a lot of money and time to get Clinton elected.
why? she is a fake, everyone can see this and no-one will vote for that
fake fart.
It won't erase the catastrophic damage wrought by Bush's neofascist
cabal; but it would mean 8 years of progress climbing out of the
fiscal canyon that Bush dug for us.
she is not worthy.
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "D. Wells" |
|
| Title: Re: WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
25 Mar 2006 12:25:55 PM |
|
|
On 24 Mar 2006 23:27:06 -0600, can_o_worms <can_o_worms@bogus.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:46:11 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Harsh words. I'm flabbergasted.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/matthews-rips-bush-for-misleading-nation-into-iraq-white-house-praises-matthews/
On "Imus In the Morning" earlier today, Chris Matthews ripped into
Bush’s handling of Iraq
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we were
avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to get them. " We
pursued the terrorists back to Iraq. And it’s all nonsense. The reason
there are terrorists in Iraq today like Zarqawi is we created the
opening by blowing the country apart. "
I mean the denial has been continuous. So you really can’t count on
the administration to tell you what is going on. That is just the
fact. You’ve got to check it out. By the way, the president said this
week that he wants the whole truth about what is going on in Iraq, the
whole truth and that the media isn’t telling the whole story. I’ll
tell you what we are not telling. We are not showing pictures of the
twenty five hundred bodies coming back because they won’t let us show
the pictures. They don’t want the whole truth out and that’s the fact.
The reason you won't often hear him take a partisan position on
"Hardball" is because his position as an interviewer requires an
appearance of impartiality just as Tim Russert must assume.
Except he has half Russert's IQ
He doesn't always stick to it but that non-partisan approach
must go with the territory of being an interviewer.
I think he shows great partiality on certain issues. Compared to
Russert or Jim Leherer (and most on his show) who exibit true
impartiality in my opinion.
If you must criticize his approach on "Hardball": It should be
on the basis of softball interviews which he does sometimes.
People I'd like to see him pitch to harder include: James
Woolsey, John McCain, and Richard Perle but he still can't
quite assume the role of a hostile interviewer.
He can. But not with people like that because they're too smart and
would reveal him for the airheaded fool he is.
He ripped into Michelle Malkin recently and he did it by taking her
off guard, inviting her on to talk about her book and never letting
her, instead attacking her on something he already disagreed with her
on (the Swift boat kerfuffle).
According to Malkin he also made inappropriate comments about her
looks, that she looked too young. We guys know that's code to see if
theirs fertile ground for more flirting. After all you wouldn't say
that to a fat chick. But a hot looking little filipino like
Malkin....
Of course, since he's not staunchly libertarian conservative like
O'Reilly know one cared but Malkin.
I have seen
Russert pitch harder but Matthews still has a pretty interesting
tabloid-free show.
I always wonder if Hillary has ever been invited to be interviewed
on Hardball.....I'll bet she has and turned it down.
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOP is HISTORY" |
|
| Title: Re: WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
25 Mar 2006 02:01:37 PM |
|
|
"D. Wells" <wellsfamily@insightbb.net> wrote in message
news:452b229tulslsift8fodhl9uu6ui9b0kuu@4ax.com...
On 24 Mar 2006 23:27:06 -0600, can_o_worms <can_o_worms@bogus.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:46:11 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Harsh words. I'm flabbergasted.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/matthews-rips-bush-for-misleading-nation-into-iraq-white-house-praises-matthews/
On "Imus In the Morning" earlier today, Chris Matthews ripped into
Bush's handling of Iraq
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we were
avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to get them. " We
pursued the terrorists back to Iraq. And it's all nonsense. The reason
there are terrorists in Iraq today like Zarqawi is we created the
opening by blowing the country apart. "
I mean the denial has been continuous. So you really can't count on
the administration to tell you what is going on. That is just the
fact. You've got to check it out. By the way, the president said this
week that he wants the whole truth about what is going on in Iraq, the
whole truth and that the media isn't telling the whole story. I'll
tell you what we are not telling. We are not showing pictures of the
twenty five hundred bodies coming back because they won't let us show
the pictures. They don't want the whole truth out and that's the fact.
The reason you won't often hear him take a partisan position on
"Hardball" is because his position as an interviewer requires an
appearance of impartiality just as Tim Russert must assume.
Except he has half Russert's IQ
He doesn't always stick to it but that non-partisan approach
must go with the territory of being an interviewer.
I think he shows great partiality on certain issues. Compared to
Russert or Jim Leherer (and most on his show) who exibit true
impartiality in my opinion.
If you must criticize his approach on "Hardball": It should be
on the basis of softball interviews which he does sometimes.
People I'd like to see him pitch to harder include: James
Woolsey, John McCain, and Richard Perle but he still can't
quite assume the role of a hostile interviewer.
He can. But not with people like that because they're too smart and
would reveal him for the airheaded fool he is.
He ripped into Michelle Malkin recently and he did it by taking her
off guard, inviting her on to talk about her book and never letting
her, instead attacking her on something he already disagreed with her
on (the Swift boat kerfuffle).
According to Malkin he also made inappropriate comments about her
looks, that she looked too young. We guys know that's code to see if
theirs fertile ground for more flirting. After all you wouldn't say
that to a fat chick. But a hot looking little filipino like
Malkin....
She'd be yapping about something the entire time. That's why God gave men
the ability to be in and out in 3 minutes, if necessary.
Of course, since he's not staunchly libertarian conservative like
O'Reilly know one cared but Malkin.
I have seen
Russert pitch harder but Matthews still has a pretty interesting
tabloid-free show.
I always wonder if Hillary has ever been invited to be interviewed
on Hardball.....I'll bet she has and turned it down.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "can_o_worms" |
|
| Title: Re: WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
25 Mar 2006 01:40:09 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 18:25:55 GMT, D. Wells <wellsfamily@insightbb.net>
wrote:
On 24 Mar 2006 23:27:06 -0600, can_o_worms <can_o_worms@bogus.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:46:11 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Harsh words. I'm flabbergasted.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/matthews-rips-bush-for-misleading-nation-into-iraq-white-house-praises-matthews/
On "Imus In the Morning" earlier today, Chris Matthews ripped into
Bush’s handling of Iraq
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we were
avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to get them. " We
pursued the terrorists back to Iraq. And it’s all nonsense. The reason
there are terrorists in Iraq today like Zarqawi is we created the
opening by blowing the country apart. "
I mean the denial has been continuous. So you really can’t count on
the administration to tell you what is going on. That is just the
fact. You’ve got to check it out. By the way, the president said this
week that he wants the whole truth about what is going on in Iraq, the
whole truth and that the media isn’t telling the whole story. I’ll
tell you what we are not telling. We are not showing pictures of the
twenty five hundred bodies coming back because they won’t let us show
the pictures. They don’t want the whole truth out and that’s the fact.
The reason you won't often hear him take a partisan position on
"Hardball" is because his position as an interviewer requires an
appearance of impartiality just as Tim Russert must assume.
Except he has half Russert's IQ
He doesn't always stick to it but that non-partisan approach
must go with the territory of being an interviewer.
I think he shows great partiality on certain issues. Compared to
Russert or Jim Leherer (and most on his show) who exibit true
impartiality in my opinion.
If you must criticize his approach on "Hardball": It should be
on the basis of softball interviews which he does sometimes.
People I'd like to see him pitch to harder include: James
Woolsey, John McCain, and Richard Perle but he still can't
quite assume the role of a hostile interviewer.
He can. But not with people like that because they're too smart and
would reveal him for the airheaded fool he is.
He ripped into Michelle Malkin recently and he did it by taking her
off guard, inviting her on to talk about her book and never letting
her, instead attacking her on something he already disagreed with her
on (the Swift boat kerfuffle).
According to Malkin he also made inappropriate comments about her
looks, that she looked too young. We guys know that's code to see if
theirs fertile ground for more flirting. After all you wouldn't say
that to a fat chick. But a hot looking little filipino like
Malkin....
Of course, since he's not staunchly libertarian conservative like
O'Reilly know one cared but Malkin.
Oh don't get me started on Ted Baxter whom I consider a typical F.O.X.
fraud. Tony Snow, O'reilly and all of these G.O.P. "Libertarians" are
either hot on Wilsonian nation building in the Middle East or hot to
initiate an Iran-War in Israel's defence and are willing to lie to the
people who fight wars for this country in order to do the task.
I'm waiting for a real Libertarian to show up on T.V......one that
doesn't shill for Republican sellouts.
You can't show me where Matthews is a supporter of either the Iraq
war or initiating a war with Iran as is Ted Baxter.
BTW
The latest Zogby poll shows that 85% of U'S. servicemen still
believe in Saddam's ties to al-Qaida.....so Matthews comments
are well recieved by me at least.
I have seen
Russert pitch harder but Matthews still has a pretty interesting
tabloid-free show.
I always wonder if Hillary has ever been invited to be interviewed
on Hardball.....I'll bet she has and turned it down.
--
another choice:
www.lp.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "D. Wells" |
|
| Title: Re: WOW - Bush toady Chris Matthews hits Bush - HITS HIM HARD |
25 Mar 2006 01:48:40 PM |
|
|
On 25 Mar 2006 13:40:09 -0600, can_o_worms <can_o_worms@bogus.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 18:25:55 GMT, D. Wells <wellsfamily@insightbb.net>
wrote:
On 24 Mar 2006 23:27:06 -0600, can_o_worms <can_o_worms@bogus.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:46:11 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
Harsh words. I'm flabbergasted.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/matthews-rips-bush-for-misleading-nation-into-iraq-white-house-praises-matthews/
On "Imus In the Morning" earlier today, Chris Matthews ripped into
Bush’s handling of Iraq
Everybody was led to believe that we were getting payback, we were
avenging what happened on 9/11 and that we are going to get them. " We
pursued the terrorists back to Iraq. And it’s all nonsense. The reason
there are terrorists in Iraq today like Zarqawi is we created the
opening by blowing the country apart. "
I mean the denial has been continuous. So you really can’t count on
the administration to tell you what is going on. That is just the
fact. You’ve got to check it out. By the way, the president said this
week that he wants the whole truth about what is going on in Iraq, the
whole truth and that the media isn’t telling the whole story. I’ll
tell you what we are not telling. We are not showing pictures of the
twenty five hundred bodies coming back because they won’t let us show
the pictures. They don’t want the whole truth out and that’s the fact.
The reason you won't often hear him take a partisan position on
"Hardball" is because his position as an interviewer requires an
appearance of impartiality just as Tim Russert must assume.
Except he has half Russert's IQ
He doesn't always stick to it but that non-partisan approach
must go with the territory of being an interviewer.
I think he shows great partiality on certain issues. Compared to
Russert or Jim Leherer (and most on his show) who exibit true
impartiality in my opinion.
If you must criticize his approach on "Hardball": It should be
on the basis of softball interviews which he does sometimes.
People I'd like to see him pitch to harder in | | | | |
