| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Dope" |
| Date: |
12 Aug 2007 11:26:05 AM |
| Object: |
Yet another liberal lie uncovered |
Yet Another Captured al-Qaeda Member Confirms UBL Had Camps In Saddam's Iraq
For those counting, this is at least the sixth confirmation of this. ABC
News led the way with three reports from captured AQ and captured IIS guys
immediately after the invasion. (h/t Amy Proctor)
The political rhetoric says that these camps were not in Saddam's Iraq but
in the Kurdish north. What that ignores is that the camps were certainly
not at all allied with the Kurds, but against them, and were acting with
Saddam's help.
Politicians often try to point to Senate Intelligence Committee reports
claiming there were no ties etc., but these reports are:
1.. Political reports not intelligence reports.
2.. The Senate Intelligence Committee is not an intelligence agency any
more than Feith's Office of Special Plans was an intelligence agency
3.. The claims of no ties in the Senate Intelligence Committee reports
were based on a single interim DIA officer's testimony-not an intelligence
investigation and subsequent conclusions
4.. believe it or not....there has NEVER been a conclusive investigation
done by ANY of the 16 intel agencies into whether or not there were AQ camps
in Iraq prior to the invasion (read the political reports carefully, and
you'll see this)
For a complete listing of the govt reports on AQ ties to Saddam's regime,
please read this
My point here is that no one has really looked into this matter, but
politicians have been happy to cherry pick it and push a false idea until
it's accepted.
Every few months there's more and more evidence leaking out that Saddam's
regime had closer ties with Al Queda than the Germans and Italians did with
the Japanese (think about it, were there Japanese training camps in Bavaria
and Tuscany? Were German and Italian troops in training camps in Japanese
held Indochina?
By and large the news media let the world down by not adequately looking
into either the Bush Administrations or the UN claims about WMD in Saddam's
Iraq, and now they're doing it again by not (FIVE YEARS LATER) examining a
question that's only been reported on by politicians and not by intelligence
agents. So the American people and the world are left to look at the videos
themselves as ABC, NBC, CBS, even Fox just won't report on the connection
and adequately describe it. We're letting politicians, professional lawyers
trained, professional liars and spinmeisters) tell us what is real and what
is not depending more on their political needs than on what is fact. Why
does the media parrot the political distortions rather than the truth?
http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/08/12/yet-another-captured-alqaeda-m/
--
What we find is that the surge has troops going into areas, where for 4 1/2
years we have not seen our military in action. Naturally, they are routing
out al Qaeda in those areas. That's a good thing.
-- Sen. ***** Durbin
.
|
|
| User: "Republican Simpletons" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet another Emu lie uncovered |
12 Aug 2007 11:27:42 AM |
|
|
"Hairy *****" <HHHA@aol.com> wrote in message
news:46bf34d9$0$8975$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
Go ferret them out for Bush.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ron ONeal" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet another liberal lie uncovered |
13 Aug 2007 07:00:59 PM |
|
|
"Harry Dope" <HHHA@aol.com> wrote in message
news:46bf34d9$0$8975$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
Yet Another Captured al-Qaeda Member Confirms UBL Had Camps In Saddam's
Iraq
For those counting, this is at least the sixth confirmation of this. ABC
News led the way with three reports from captured AQ and captured IIS guys
immediately after the invasion. (h/t Amy Proctor)
The political rhetoric says that these camps were not in Saddam's Iraq but
in the Kurdish north. What that ignores is that the camps were certainly
not at all allied with the Kurds, but against them, and were acting with
Saddam's help.
Politicians often try to point to Senate Intelligence Committee reports
claiming there were no ties etc., but these reports are:
<snipped>
Well then, tell us why (if your post is on target) Bush hasn't told us about
this item. He would be the first to let us know, now wouldn't he?
Oh wait a minute! Your pathetic-grasping-at-straws Googling efforts have
scooped the CIA, FBI, NSA, DHS, and all the other agencies. Now I see the
light.
RO
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "zzpat" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet another liberal lie uncovered |
12 Aug 2007 11:29:22 AM |
|
|
Harry Dope wrote:
Yet Another Captured al-Qaeda Member Confirms UBL Had Camps In Saddam's Iraq
The problem is simple; the Bush White House admits Saddam had nothing to
do with 911. That being the case, there's nothing to argue.
--
Impeach Bush
http://zzpat.bravehost.com
Impeach Search Engine
http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=012146513885108216046:rzesyut3kmm
.
|
|
|
| User: "George Grapman" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet another liberal lie uncovered |
12 Aug 2007 12:13:32 PM |
|
|
zzpat wrote:
Harry Dope wrote:
Yet Another Captured al-Qaeda Member Confirms UBL Had Camps In
Saddam's Iraq
The problem is simple; the Bush White House admits Saddam had nothing to
do with 911. That being the case, there's nothing to argue.
In addition they also admit there were no WMDs but say they still
would have invaded had they known that at the time.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Henry" |
|
| Title: Re: Yet another liberal lie uncovered |
12 Aug 2007 12:17:04 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:26:05 -0400, Harry Dope wrote:
Yet Another Captured al-Qaeda Member Confirms UBL Had Camps In Saddam's
Iraq
We know that he did you blathering idiot. The camp was in northern Iraq
protected by the US. Saddam had no access . Bush REFUSED to allow the
military to take these camps out.
But there were ties between Saddam and Al Qaeda
Yep...your boy idiot protected Al Qaeda camps from Saddam.
Pathetic huh?
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
