Exactly, 5 were already gone, Rome was in power at the time, and one
was yet to
come.
The Angel specifically said "Five have fallen, one is, (Rome), the
other has
not yet come; but when he does come, he must remain for a little
while. The
Beast who once was (had already gone), and now is not (It ain't going
to be
Rome), is an eighth King. He belongs to the Seven and is going to his
destruction." Rev. 17:10-11
From all of the other prophecies given in the Bible, the most likely
candidate
is the old Babylonian Empire, which had it's center of power in
Babylon, Iraq.
Tony
Babylon is also a Metaphor for an economic centre, But you reckon that
some Trumpets have blown, S11 should tell you a paraphrse of an
Ezekiel quote:
You shall be your enemies foot stool, so a dipping is in order first!
LB
.
|
|
| User: "JimGem3015" |
|
| Title: Re: 666 Beast Empire is the Return of a Past Empire |
10 Dec 2004 01:04:20 PM |
|
|
Exactly, 5 were already gone, Rome was in power at the time, and one
was yet to
come.
What power followed Rome as the contolling force in the area that comprised the
Asian kingdoms of Alexander?
Islam.
In the book of Revelation, the seven churches were chosen because in the
seventh century AD, at the conclusion of the seventh Ecumenical Council, the
area that remained under the control of the Byzantine Empire had shrunk to
specifically include these seven churches. Not one church listed is outside of
this area. The seven churches are intended to place in time, this specific
prophecy. Look up a map of Byzantium in the seventh century. Also, after the
seventh Ecumenical council, the authority of the church moved to Rome. This
prophecy from the book of Revelation also refuses to recognize the authority of
Rome, the eventual and soon to be, ***** of Babylon. Also, look up the date
when the first Mosque was completed. Not converted, but built from scratch,
from the ground up. Hint - it was built in Basra.
The year, as calculated in the Julian calendar, was the year 666. Look it up in
an Arabic Architectural Digest, authored by scholarly Muslims. Copies were
available to me at Calvin College, and must be availabe elsewhere. Remember to
include the months from the Hijra when converting the Islamic year to the
Julian calendar. Year 1 of the Islamic calendar started July 16th, C.E. 622
(Julian calendar).
The book of Revelation, literal translated, confirms that the number is "for of
a man it is". Read this again. For - of a man - it is. The number 666
represents something that is - of a man - for a man, dedicated to that man....a
Mosque.
With this clear understanding, another passage from the book of Revelation
takes on a new meaning, particularly when held in light of the Abrahamic
covenant. What do you think might have been implied in this prophecy by the
passage from Rev.2:9..."I know your tribulation and your poverty (but you are
rich) and the slander of those who say that they are Jews, and are not, but are
a synagoge of Satan" (Satan being ignorance and error.)
By the way, the passage that follows: "Do not fear what you are about to
suffer. Behold, the devil is about to throw some of you into prison, that you
may be tested, and for ten days you will have tribulation"...this passage (a
day shall equal a year; the book of Ezekiel) refers to the years 1935 through
1945. From the year of the adoption of the Nuremberg Laws till the defeat of
Nazi Germany. And who do you think Antipas is? "My faithful servant"? None
other than the Presper Arias, a good and faithful man.
JIM
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cuan" |
|
| Title: Re: 666 Beast Empire is the Return of a Past Empire |
13 Dec 2004 04:43:24 AM |
|
|
On 10 Dec 2004 19:04:20 GMT, (JimGem3015) wrote:
With this clear understanding, another passage from the book of Revelation
takes on a new meaning, particularly when held in light of the Abrahamic
covenant. What do you think might have been implied in this prophecy by the
passage from Rev.2:9..."I know your tribulation and your poverty (but you are
rich) and the slander of those who say that they are Jews, and are not, but are
a synagoge of Satan" (Satan being ignorance and error.)
I tip my hat to your in depth analysis of the prophesies. I may not
agree with all, but I find your synopsis well thought out and well
researched.
Jean Guernon would not agree with me, even if it was spelt out in big
black capital letters in the very first chapter of the Bible itself,
but Moslems do not and have never professed to being Jewish. There
is, however, a rather huge (the majority) contingent of 'Jews' who
even believe themselves to be Semitic Jews, yet are not. These 'Jews'
emanated from the areas of Magog/Turkey and adopted the faith as their
own. Do a search for "Khazar", although I'm sure you're probably
familiar with the term. What came from this were the torch-bearers of
the Bavarian elite - the Illuminati. Do a search for "Rothschild"
cross-referenced with "Khazar". You'll more than likely read a few
nifty pieces on the origins of the 'Star/Shield of David' too. The
hexagram first appeared in red on a Jewish flag in Prague in 1527, and
also on the coat of arms of the Rothschild family in 1822. It was
first used by David Al-Roy during the time he and his Khazarian cult
planned to invade Palestine...presumably, this is where one derives
the star of "David" from. This occurred in the 12th century. He and
his father, Solomon Ben Duji, sent letters to the Jews in all the
surrounding lands. They said that the time had come in which God would
gather Israel, His people from all lands to Jerusalem, the holy city,
and that he, Solomon Ben Duji was Elijah, and his son was the Messiah.
David Al-Roy also self-professed to be a practicioner of magick before
a sultan in Iraq.
In effect, the Rothschilds were highly influencial in the birth of the
state of Israel, and indeed even have a road named after them in the
capital, afaik. The Rothschilds are purely a few peas in the
Illuminati pod with a Khazarian history. Mayer Rothschild was
formerly Mayer Bauer - but changed his name to Rothschild, meaning
"red shield', presumably after the red hexagram sported by the "red"
Jews of Khazaria - the red shield of David.
How did they migrate? Simple. Their lands were invaded in 867 AD by
the Varangian Rus - a Scandinavian viking sect who occupied their
territory. After a time of dwelling side-by-side with the Khazars,
the Varangian Rus eventually expelled them. They fled north into
Germany and Hungary, and undoubtedly further into early Russia. These
"red Jews" originally came from an area of Magog called Ashkenaz,
which they had once ruled over.
To synopsise, the Khazars were not reliant on God nor were they
waiting on God. They were bankers and lovers of money and had a
strong desire for political power. To me, the passage I quoted from
you above appears to point to this people, and not to the Semites of
the middle-east, neither Jewish nor Moslem. Rothschild, a Khazar by
descent, made Israel a reality the same as David Al-Roy had tried
eight centuries before him. The actual Semitic Jews amounted to a few
hundred thousand in number in the late 1970's - the Khazarian Jews
comprise the balance.
The Khazars are they who "say that they are Jews, and are not".
Here's one resource which I used. Some passages above are
quotes...forgot to put quote marks and don't really want to look for
them now. ;-)
http://www.tribwatch.com/redshield.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "JimGem3015" |
|
| Title: Re: 666 Beast Empire is the Return of a Past Empire |
13 Dec 2004 01:18:00 PM |
|
|
The Khazars are they who "say that they are Jews, and are not".
Thank you for your thoughtful reply. Perspective is everything, and often the
sourse of so much unhappiness upon this earth. There are many who might qualify
as those that "say they are Jews but are not".
Remember also that the Qu'ran substitutesd Ismail for Isaac in the line of
Abrahamic blessings. What does this say about Jacob?
The Hebrew text repeats several times that the Lord whats to be known for all
time as the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Several times we are told that
Jacob will be raised to rule Israel.
But does this mean as a Jew?
As a Christian?
As a Muslim?
NO!
Who was the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob?
His name was EL !!
The oldest recored name for God in all history. The god of all tribes and
peoples. The God of Melchezedec, the Priest Most High, the son of God, a priest
forever.
Understand this riddle and recognize that while God is one and undivided, he
does indeed have a son, Melchezedec, who has been with us forever.
Many changes draw near.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: 666 Beast Empire is the Return of a Past Empire |
13 Dec 2004 02:34:48 PM |
|
|
JimGem3015 wrote:
The Khazars are they who "say that they are Jews, and are not".
Thank you for your thoughtful reply. Perspective is everything, and
often the
sourse of so much unhappiness upon this earth. There are many who
might qualify
as those that "say they are Jews but are not".
Remember also that the Qu'ran substitutesd Ismail for Isaac in the
line of
Abrahamic blessings. What does this say about Jacob?
The Hebrew text repeats several times that the Lord whats to be known
for all
time as the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Several times we are
told that
Jacob will be raised to rule Israel.
But does this mean as a Jew?
As a Christian?
As a Muslim?
NO!
Who was the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob?
His name was EL !!
The oldest recored name for God in all history.
Not to quibble but...
How about Aten? Especially when you consider that El was the chief god
of the Canaanite pantheon until El's son Adad came into favour! The
early Hebrews were Canaanites who continued to worship El as the primary
god.
It’s thought that the Cult of El was originally transported to Canaan
from Babylonia, where El was known as Ellil, from the Sumerian Enlil,
who was infamous for prohibiting his followers from worshipping other gods.
Not to let facts intrude on a good story.
-A
The god of all tribes and
peoples. The God of Melchezedec, the Priest Most High, the son of
God, a priest
forever.
Understand this riddle and recognize that while God is one and
undivided, he
does indeed have a son, Melchezedec, who has been with us forever.
Many changes draw near.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JimGem3015" |
|
| Title: Re: 666 Beast Empire is the Return of a Past Empire |
13 Dec 2004 04:38:10 PM |
|
|
El was the chief god
of the Canaanite pantheon until El's son Adad came into favour! The
early Hebrews were Canaanites who continued to worship El as the primary
god.
And what was the other name given to El's son whom the Canaanites started
worshipping in place of El?
Ba'al.
What does El have to say about worshipping the son in place of the Creator?
Did the third century church father sstumble just a little?
When Jacob finished wrestling with the Angel, God spoke to Jacob and changed
his name to Israel, which Jacob would have understood to mean: "he who has seen
El".
Jacob then asked God his name, to which El replied "Say what?" "tell you my
name?"
And El just sighed.
(Look it up.)
Hundreds of years later, when Moses and Joshua went up to recieve the tablets,
Moses repeated Jacobs question by asking God his name. Having already given his
name to Joshua hundreds of years earlier, God answered "I am who I am."
Moses excitedly "ambled down the mountain" (Joshua carried the tablets) and
declared "I am" just spoke to me"... and El just sighed, and Joshua scratched
his head.
The Lord then thought.."I need a prophet". And Moses later repeated what the
Lord had said to him... "I will send you a prophet, but "The Prophet" you must
not listen to." And the people replied "Say what?" And El just sighed once
more.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: 666 Beast Empire is the Return of a Past Empire |
13 Dec 2004 06:15:03 PM |
|
|
JimGem3015 wrote:
El was the chief god
of the Canaanite pantheon until El's son Adad came into favour! The
early Hebrews were Canaanites who continued to worship El as the primary
god.
And what was the other name given to El's son whom the Canaanites started
worshipping in place of El?
Ba'al.
What does El have to say about worshipping the son in place of the Creator?
He seems to have had jealousy issues just like Enlil. Anthropomorphism
was and is, rife.
Did the third century church father sstumble just a little?
You mean the first council of Nicaea? 4th Century.
The Arian vs Trinitarian kerfuffle, right?
If so, then yes.. a travesty.
When Jacob finished wrestling with the Angel, God spoke to Jacob and changed
his name to Israel, which Jacob would have understood to mean: "he who has seen
El".
Jacob then asked God his name, to which El replied "Say what?" "tell you my
name?"
And El just sighed.
(Look it up.)
Hundreds of years later, when Moses and Joshua went up to recieve the tablets,
Moses repeated Jacobs question by asking God his name. Having already given his
name to Joshua hundreds of years earlier, God answered "I am who I am."
Moses excitedly "ambled down the mountain" (Joshua carried the tablets) and
declared "I am" just spoke to me"... and El just sighed, and Joshua scratched
his head.
The Lord then thought.."I need a prophet". And Moses later repeated what the
Lord had said to him... "I will send you a prophet, but "The Prophet" you must
not listen to." And the people replied "Say what?" And El just sighed once
more.
No way am I bibble 'spurt, or Christian, I read you because you've
managed, despite the best efforts of the church, to parse some of the
truth they've taken such pains to hide. That said, I do know a little
history.
I still maintain that the Aten was the first monotheism. Note that
Ramesses II was born just 48 years after Akhenaten. There may be some
dots to join between Akhenaten and Moses.
Someone I usually ignore, Sigmund Freud, put forward just such a
proposal in his last book "Moses and Monotheism."
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: 666 Beast Empire is the Return of a Past Empire |
13 Dec 2004 08:20:20 PM |
|
|
Absolute Zero wrote:
8<
Someone I usually ignore, Sigmund Freud, put forward just such a
proposal in his last book "Moses and Monotheism."
First I'm thinking… ooh, an original idea and whilst checking my facts I
discover that Freud beat me to it. Now I find someone else has published
the proposal that Moses & Akhenaten are one and the same. Oh well, there
goes the publishing deal.
http://www.seekerbooks.com/egypt/pharaohs/1591430046/
Either way, fantastically unlikely that the two strands contending for
monotheistic novelty just happened to originate in the same place at
roughly the same time, doncha think?
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cuan" |
|
| Title: Re: 666 Beast Empire is the Return of a Past Empire |
14 Dec 2004 02:26:36 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:20:20 +0000, Absolute Zero
<amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Absolute Zero wrote:
8<
Someone I usually ignore, Sigmund Freud, put forward just such a
proposal in his last book "Moses and Monotheism."
First I'm thinking… ooh, an original idea and whilst checking my facts I
discover that Freud beat me to it. Now I find someone else has published
the proposal that Moses & Akhenaten are one and the same. Oh well, there
goes the publishing deal.
I always thought that Ramses II was the pharoah that Moses beseeched
to let the Israelites go...i can't claim to know this for a fact,
though.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: 666 Beast Empire is the Return of a Past Empire |
14 Dec 2004 05:04:43 AM |
|
|
Cuan wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:20:20 +0000, Absolute Zero
<amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Absolute Zero wrote:
8<
Someone I usually ignore, Sigmund Freud, put forward just such a
proposal in his last book "Moses and Monotheism."
First I'm thinking… ooh, an original idea and whilst checking my facts I
discover that Freud beat me to it. Now I find someone else has published
the proposal that Moses & Akhenaten are one and the same. Oh well, there
goes the publishing deal.
I always thought that Ramses II was the pharoah that Moses beseeched
to let the Israelites go...i can't claim to know this for a fact,
though.
Most agree...
I just threw that into the mix, my main point remains...
=>
I still maintain that the Aten was the first monotheism. Note that
Ramesses II was born just 48 years after Akhenaten. There may be some
dots to join between Akhenaten and Moses.
<=
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "JimGem3015" |
|
| Title: Re: 666 Beast Empire is the Return of a Past Empire |
14 Dec 2004 08:15:11 AM |
|
|
I always thought that Ramses II was the pharoah that Moses beseeched
to let the Israelites go...i can't claim to know this for a fact,
though.
Most agree...
I just threw that into the mix, my main point remains...
=>
I still maintain that the Aten was the first monotheism. Note that
Ramesses II was born just 48 years after Akhenaten. There may be some
dots to join between Akhenaten and Moses.
<=
Read the Egyptian Corpus Hermeticum, and see if you might not find Moses there.
Remember the characters in the Corpus are in high standing, and commune with
the Creator. Notice that in the Corpus Hermeticum, as in the Old and New
Testaments, reincarnation as "the life eternal" is quietly inferred.
"Did I not tell ye, thee are gods?" (Old Testament).
If a fabulously wealthy merchant does nothing with his wealth to help in
eliminating hunger, which covers a great portion of this earth, what is the
likelihood that he will be reborn into hunger?
As you sow on earth, so you sow in heaven.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: 666 Beast Empire is the Return of a Past Empire |
14 Dec 2004 10:46:25 AM |
|
|
JimGem3015 wrote:
I always thought that Ramses II was the pharoah that Moses beseeched
to let the Israelites go...i can't claim to know this for a fact,
though.
Most agree...
I just threw that into the mix, my main point remains...
=>
I still maintain that the Aten was the first monotheism. Note that
Ramesses II was born just 48 years after Akhenaten. There may be some
dots to join between Akhenaten and Moses.
<=
Read the Egyptian Corpus Hermeticum, and see if you might not find
Moses there.
Remember the characters in the Corpus are in high standing, and
commune with
the Creator. Notice that in the Corpus Hermeticum, as in the Old and New
Testaments, reincarnation as "the life eternal" is quietly inferred.
Yes, that was what I was quietly inferring up the thread.
My resources suggest AD authorship, though they admit a probable back
history into Pharaonic Egypt. Investigating........
Damn those hermetic initiates and their convoluted, esoteric imagery.
Where's Gary? For greater transparency on this subject, I prefer Jesus
in India/Tibet, St Isa.
I assume you're familiar with "The lost years of Jesus"?
Scholarly critique here:
http://www.proaxis.com/~deardorj/ecumensm.htm
Précis:
=>
The "lost years" evidence due to Notovitch in 1894 of Jesus being in
India during his youth, along with its debunkings, are re-examined and
the latter are found not to have been scholarly in any sense. Later
evidence fully confirming Notovitch's find is presented. The
implications that Jesus taught reincarnation and karma, not
resurrection, are summarized and found entirely plausible. The
ramifications this has for ecumenism with respect to the Eastern
religions cannot be overstated, though for Christianity they remain
unacceptable.
<=
"Did I not tell ye, thee are gods?" (Old Testament).
If a fabulously wealthy merchant does nothing with his wealth to help in
eliminating hunger, which covers a great portion of this earth, what
is the
likelihood that he will be reborn into hunger?
Ask Tony when he returns as a gay camel herder.
As you sow on earth, so you sow in heaven.
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cuan" |
|
| Title: Re: 666 Beast Empire is the Return of a Past Empire |
14 Dec 2004 11:51:20 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:46:25 +0000, Absolute Zero
<amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
JimGem3015 wrote:
I always thought that Ramses II was the pharoah that Moses beseeched
to let the Israelites go...i can't claim to know this for a fact,
though.
Most agree...
I just threw that into the mix, my main point remains...
=>
I still maintain that the Aten was the first monotheism. Note that
Ramesses II was born just 48 years after Akhenaten. There may be some
dots to join between Akhenaten and Moses.
<=
Read the Egyptian Corpus Hermeticum, and see if you might not find
Moses there.
Remember the characters in the Corpus are in high standing, and
commune with
the Creator. Notice that in the Corpus Hermeticum, as in the Old and New
Testaments, reincarnation as "the life eternal" is quietly inferred.
Yes, that was what I was quietly inferring up the thread.
My resources suggest AD authorship, though they admit a probable back
history into Pharaonic Egypt. Investigating........
Damn those hermetic initiates and their convoluted, esoteric imagery.
Where's Gary? For greater transparency on this subject, I prefer Jesus
in India/Tibet, St Isa.
I assume you're familiar with "The lost years of Jesus"?
Scholarly critique here:
http://www.proaxis.com/~deardorj/ecumensm.htm
Précis:
=>
The "lost years" evidence due to Notovitch in 1894 of Jesus being in
India during his youth, along with its debunkings, are re-examined and
the latter are found not to have been scholarly in any sense. Later
evidence fully confirming Notovitch's find is presented. The
implications that Jesus taught reincarnation and karma, not
resurrection, are summarized and found entirely plausible. The
ramifications this has for ecumenism with respect to the Eastern
religions cannot be overstated, though for Christianity they remain
unacceptable.
<=
"Did I not tell ye, thee are gods?" (Old Testament).
If a fabulously wealthy merchant does nothing with his wealth to help in
eliminating hunger, which covers a great portion of this earth, what
is the
likelihood that he will be reborn into hunger?
Ask Tony when he returns as a gay camel herder.
LOL! A skinny gay camel herder, fighting a jihad against homophobic
neocons!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: 666 Beast Empire is the Return of a Past Empire |
14 Dec 2004 11:55:39 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 07:51:20 +0200, Cuan <an@nymous.co.za> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:46:25 +0000, Absolute Zero
<amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
JimGem3015 wrote:
I always thought that Ramses II was the pharoah that Moses beseeched
to let the Israelites go...i can't claim to know this for a fact,
though.
Most agree...
I just threw that into the mix, my main point remains...
=>
I still maintain that the Aten was the first monotheism. Note that
Ramesses II was born just 48 years after Akhenaten. There may be some
dots to join between Akhenaten and Moses.
<=
Read the Egyptian Corpus Hermeticum, and see if you might not find
Moses there.
Remember the characters in the Corpus are in high standing, and
commune with
the Creator. Notice that in the Corpus Hermeticum, as in the Old and New
Testaments, reincarnation as "the life eternal" is quietly inferred.
Yes, that was what I was quietly inferring up the thread.
My resources suggest AD authorship, though they admit a probable back
history into Pharaonic Egypt. Investigating........
Damn those hermetic initiates and their convoluted, esoteric imagery.
Where's Gary? For greater transparency on this subject, I prefer Jesus
in India/Tibet, St Isa.
I assume you're familiar with "The lost years of Jesus"?
Scholarly critique here:
http://www.proaxis.com/~deardorj/ecumensm.htm
Précis:
=>
The "lost years" evidence due to Notovitch in 1894 of Jesus being in
India during his youth, along with its debunkings, are re-examined and
the latter are found not to have been scholarly in any sense. Later
evidence fully confirming Notovitch's find is presented. The
implications that Jesus taught reincarnation and karma, not
resurrection, are summarized and found entirely plausible. The
ramifications this has for ecumenism with respect to the Eastern
religions cannot be overstated, though for Christianity they remain
unacceptable.
<=
"Did I not tell ye, thee are gods?" (Old Testament).
If a fabulously wealthy merchant does nothing with his wealth to help in
eliminating hunger, which covers a great portion of this earth, what
is the
likelihood that he will be reborn into hunger?
Ask Tony when he returns as a gay camel herder.
LOL! A skinny gay camel herder, fighting a jihad against homophobic
neocons!
Make that a skinny gay **woman** camel herder, fighting a Jihad
against homophobic neocons .. ;)
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "JimGem3015" |
|
| Title: Re: 666 Beast Empire is the Return of a Past Empire |
15 Dec 2004 07:52:30 PM |
|
|
Make that a skinny gay **woman** camel herder, fighting a Jihad
against homophobic neocons .. ;)
Dani
:) OK
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: 666 Beast Empire is the Return of a Past Empire |
13 Dec 2004 07:23:59 PM |
|
|
Absolute Zero wrote:
JimGem3015 wrote:
8<
I still maintain that the Aten was the first monotheism. Note that
Ramesses II was born just 48 years after Akhenaten. There may be some
dots to join between Akhenaten and Moses.
Clarification: 48 years after Akhenaten died.
-A
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: 666 Beast Empire is the Return of a Past Empire |
13 Dec 2004 02:53:03 PM |
|
|
confusing, some thought Enlil was the former Marduk[e], but them later
both were separated. However, both were (had) nasty attitudes (
attributes) toward human' and human rights ;) Enlil wanted and tried
to wipe out manking ( See: Sumerian Flood epic)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: 666 Beast Empire is the Return of a Past Empire |
13 Dec 2004 02:59:23 PM |
|
|
Michael Johnathan McDonald wrote:
confusing, some thought Enlil was the former Marduk[e], but them later
both were separated. However, both were (had) nasty attitudes (
attributes) toward human' and human rights ;) Enlil wanted and tried
to wipe out manking ( See: Sumerian Flood epic)
Did you try my suggestion?
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: 666 Beast Empire is the Return of a Past Empire |
13 Dec 2004 03:02:32 PM |
|
|
About looking into (found) increments of irrational numbers from your
link?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: 666 Beast Empire is the Return of a Past Empire |
13 Dec 2004 03:08:59 PM |
|
|
Michael Johnathan McDonald wrote:
About looking into (found) increments of irrational numbers from your
link?
change..
mysql_fetch_array($result)
to..
mysql_fetch_row($result)
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: 666 Beast Empire is the Return of a Past Empire |
13 Dec 2004 03:16:15 PM |
|
|
No I didn't see that - I was gone for two days - studying for finals.
I'll get back to you later; Cool & thanks. I have a final in a few
hours in 'Poli Sci II' on Dual Transitions ( Brazil hist. 1930s-2004)
and general Globalization policies with Russia's Republics in
economic transition after 1992.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: 666 Beast Empire is the Return of a Past Empire |
13 Dec 2004 03:02:08 PM |
|
|
Michael Johnathan McDonald wrote:
confusing, some thought Enlil was the former Marduk[e], but them later
both were separated. However, both were (had) nasty attitudes (
attributes) toward human' and human rights ;) Enlil wanted and tried
to wipe out manking ( See: Sumerian Flood epic)
My main point is that EL has previous (UK cop slang) as head of a pantheon.
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: 666 Beast Empire is the Return of a Past Empire |
13 Dec 2004 03:06:01 PM |
|
|
Ohh.. we have pop culture all over the globe with this ancient stuff -
need to look hard into things sometimes, but its there :) Anyway,
Enlil/ Jewish 'God' is established a long time ago. Just think all
those secret society meetings late at night pondering these concepts
when these manuscripts were first unearthed ;) Created many new [ but
old] industries for our world of consumption, eh? :)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
