800,000,000 lbs of weapons have been recovered by US and Ally troops
since the Iraq war II invasion. Now that is a damper in terrorist
groups, eh?
Aren't you anti-terrorists happy? :-)
How 'bout that Pres. Bush?
Hip,Hip Horraaayyyyyyy ;)
Kerry does not mention the "400,000 tons of weapons and explosives
that our troops have captured." - Cheney Tue, Oct 26, 2004.
http://www.MichaelReport.com
Source:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20041026/ap_on_el_pr/cheney_8
By PETE YOST, Associated Press Writer
Cheney Rejects Kerry Criticism on Iraq
.
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: 800,000,000 lbs of weapons and explosives |
27 Oct 2004 08:32:24 PM |
|
|
In article <dd3256f0.0410261643.2738d012@posting.google.com>, (Michael Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
800,000,000 lbs of weapons have been recovered by US and Ally troops
since the Iraq war II invasion. Now that is a damper in terrorist
groups, eh?
No, since none of them were destined for terrorist groups prior to the invasion.
Aren't you anti-terrorists happy? :-)
How 'bout that Pres. Bush?
He's a screw-up.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: 800,000,000 lbs of weapons and explosives |
28 Oct 2004 12:25:27 PM |
|
|
Woods, again denigrating your commander in chief based on lies... Tsss.
J.
Woodswun a écrit:
In article <dd3256f0.0410261643.2738d012@posting.google.com>, (Michael Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
800,000,000 lbs of weapons have been recovered by US and Ally troops
since the Iraq war II invasion. Now that is a damper in terrorist
groups, eh?
No, since none of them were destined for terrorist groups prior to the invasion.
Aren't you anti-terrorists happy? :-)
How 'bout that Pres. Bush?
He's a screw-up.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: 800,000,000 lbs of weapons and explosives |
28 Oct 2004 10:57:24 PM |
|
|
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
Woods, again denigrating your commander in chief based on lies... Tsss.
Bush is going to make the ultimate sacrifice for his country.
After having done what he thought was right, he'll be drummed
out of office in disgrace, mostly for incompetence. The ultimate
sacrifice, no less a fate than many US service personnel in Iraq.
J.
Woodswun a écrit:
In article <dd3256f0.0410261643.2738d012@posting.google.com>,
abookoflife@yahoo.com (Michael Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
800,000,000 lbs of weapons have been recovered by US and Ally troops
since the Iraq war II invasion. Now that is a damper in terrorist
groups, eh?
No, since none of them were destined for terrorist groups prior to the
invasion.
Aren't you anti-terrorists happy? :-)
How 'bout that Pres. Bush?
He's a screw-up.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: 800,000,000 lbs of weapons and explosives |
29 Oct 2004 01:12:01 PM |
|
|
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message news:<Xns9590DF5B7B4A6rrfkwrantispamattbic@63.240.76.16>...
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
Woods, again denigrating your commander in chief based on lies... Tsss.
Bush is going to make the ultimate sacrifice for his country.
After having done what he thought was right, he'll be drummed
out of office in disgrace, mostly for incompetence. The ultimate
sacrifice, no less a fate than many US service personnel in Iraq.
And you base this on what evidence? Not everyone thinks that Bush is
bad ya know. We know that John Kerry is going to support Iran's
Nuclear program, and frankly this frightens me because Iran bases
their laws on the Qu'ran and not civil secular law. When a wacko gets
a hold of those WMD controls it's all over and you seem to leave this
out of your opinion.
23 Arab states in the world and only one of them is ruled in a
semblance of Democracy for 'any length of time' - that is Israel. Now
Afgh. and Iraq are starting to change and maybe sensible people will
have a vote not to let wacko leaders have controls over Military
operations in the future.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: 800,000,000 lbs of weapons and explosives |
29 Oct 2004 09:22:53 PM |
|
|
(Michael Johnathan McDonald) Spat the Words
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:<Xns9590DF5B7B4A6rrfkwrantispamattbic@63.240.76.16>...
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
Woods, again denigrating your commander in chief based on lies...
Tsss.
Bush is going to make the ultimate sacrifice for his country.
After having done what he thought was right, he'll be drummed
out of office in disgrace, mostly for incompetence. The ultimate
sacrifice, no less a fate than many US service personnel in Iraq.
And you base this on what evidence? Not everyone thinks that Bush is
bad ya know. We know that John Kerry is going to support Iran's
Nuclear program, and frankly this frightens me because Iran bases
their laws on the Qu'ran and not civil secular law. When a wacko gets
a hold of those WMD controls it's all over and you seem to leave this
out of your opinion.
Here's some news for you. Before Bush took office, N Korea didn't
have any nukes... now they have 6-8 nukes. When Bush took office,
all N Korea's nuclear activities were being monitored by tv camera
and regular inspections, then Bush decided he wouldn't talk to Kim
and next thing you know the tv cameras are gone, inspections stop,
and the nuclear fuel rods go missing, and voila, 6-8 nukes appear
in their arsenal.
You still feeling safe about Bush's policies?
23 Arab states in the world and only one of them is ruled in a
semblance of Democracy for 'any length of time' - that is Israel. Now
Afgh. and Iraq are starting to change and maybe sensible people will
have a vote not to let wacko leaders have controls over Military
operations in the future.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: 800,000,000 lbs of weapons and explosives |
30 Oct 2004 12:48:05 PM |
|
|
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
Here's some news for you. Before Bush took office, N Korea didn't
have any nukes... now they have 6-8 nukes.
Get a clue freak - it was Clinton's '90s economic policy that Built
the Small Water Nuclear reactor [in accordance with Australia] that is
now harvesting those weapons. You are one dumb mutha ;)
This is common knowledge you idiot. We can go toe-to-toe on nuclear
proliferation issues when ever you are ready chump. We can start by
displaying $44,000,000 of direct deposits into the DNC from the PLA.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: 800,000,000 lbs of weapons and explosives |
30 Oct 2004 05:18:42 AM |
|
|
R. Foreman a écrit:
abookoflife@yahoo.com (Michael Johnathan McDonald) Spat the Words
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:<Xns9590DF5B7B4A6rrfkwrantispamattbic@63.240.76.16>...
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
Woods, again denigrating your commander in chief based on lies...
Tsss.
Bush is going to make the ultimate sacrifice for his country.
After having done what he thought was right, he'll be drummed
out of office in disgrace, mostly for incompetence. The ultimate
sacrifice, no less a fate than many US service personnel in Iraq.
And you base this on what evidence? Not everyone thinks that Bush is
bad ya know. We know that John Kerry is going to support Iran's
Nuclear program, and frankly this frightens me because Iran bases
their laws on the Qu'ran and not civil secular law. When a wacko gets
a hold of those WMD controls it's all over and you seem to leave this
out of your opinion.
Here's some news for you. Before Bush took office, N Korea didn't
have any nukes...
Get a clue yourself. This is what Clinton policies led to
January 2, 2001: The United States imposes sanctions on North Korea's
Changgwang Sinyong Corporation for violation of the Iran
Nonproliferation Act of 2000.*
and this was only a drop in the long saga of violations, for instance
April 6, 2000: The United States imposes sanctions on a North Korean
firm, Changgwang Sinyong Corporation, for proliferating MTCR Category I
items, possibly to Iran. Category I items include complete missile
systems with ranges exceeding 300 kilometers and payloads over 500
kilograms, major subsystems, rocket stages or guidance systems,
production facilities for MTCR-class missiles, or technology associated
with such missiles.*
Kimmy was virtually breaking every single engagement and making
everything to lead to nukes under Clinton,. That he took the excuse of
Bush request to verify to have a temper tantrum and launch the missiles
he had constructed under Clinton's and start processing the stuff to put
in the warhead is merely a result of Clinton's strategy.
now they have 6-8 nukes.
All this is because Clinton's policies didn't work and he was
fabricating them. But it takes some time to transform their violation
into bombs. Typical of Dems weasels to dump their guilt on those who
have taken the right steps. And to think they would go back to what led
to this, really, total irresponsibility.
When Bush took office,
all N Korea's nuclear activities were being monitored by tv camera
and regular inspections, then Bush decided he wouldn't talk to Kim
and next thing you know the tv cameras are gone, inspections stop,
and the nuclear fuel rods go missing, and voila, 6-8 nukes appear
in their arsenal.
that was merely an excuse as they had been working on this under Clinton
testing missiles to send them, and now were ready to proceed under the
flawed accord. It was already going on...
You still feeling safe about Bush's policies?
Much more than what led to the actual situation. Takes time to repair
flawed policies.
Remember how Clinton dealt with Kimmy's missiles in the first place?
July 12, 2000: The fifth round of U.S.-North Korean missile talks in
Kuala Lumpur end without resolution. During the meeting, North Korea
repeats its demand for compensation, stated as $1 billion per year, in
return for halting missile exports. The United States rejects this
proposal but says that it is willing to move toward “economic
normalization” in return for addressing U.S. concerns.
What was the result of the dems policies at the end of Clinton's
administration?
March 7, 2001: In a New York Times op-ed, Wendy Sherman, former special
adviser to the president and secretary of state for North Korea policy,
writes that a deal with North Korea to eliminate its medium- and
long-range missiles and end its missile exports had been “tantalizingly
close” at the end of the Clinton administration.
[I.e. NO DEAL. Very easy to give the impression it is close, it is not
closed so who is to say it is close?]
After a working meeting with South Korean President Kim Dae-jung at the
White House, President George W. Bush tells reporters that he “look[s]
forward to, at some point in the future, having a dialogue with the
North Koreans, but that any negotiation would require complete
verification of the terms of a potential agreement.” According to
Clinton administration officials, the issue of how to verify a missile
deal remained one of the final stumbling blocks to a successful
arrangement. Bush also questions whether Pyongyang is “keeping all terms
of all agreements.”
Of course this is basic logic given everything North Korea did despite
every effort. Trust and verify is basic.
But Kim wanted to have his cake and eat it too, this is when he show
cased his temper tantrum. Of course total theater.
Yes, under the dems, he would have gone on without verification and get
the money at the same time. Now he has to deal with 6 countries, and
there will be clauses stipulating verification. What Kerry wants is give
them back the billions. take the other countries out of the loop. And
let them verify themselves again. which led to the proliferation and the
actual missile and fissile material issues we face. Big deal.
J.
23 Arab states in the world and only one of them is ruled in a
semblance of Democracy for 'any length of time' - that is Israel. Now
Afgh. and Iraq are starting to change and maybe sensible people will
have a vote not to let wacko leaders have controls over Military
operations in the future.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: 800,000,000 lbs of weapons and explosives |
29 Oct 2004 01:08:03 PM |
|
|
R. Foreman a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> Spat the Words
Woods, again denigrating your commander in chief based on lies... Tsss.
Bush is going to make the ultimate sacrifice for his country.
After having done what he thought was right, he'll be drummed
out of office in disgrace, mostly for incompetence.
Still based on lies by weasels, if ever this kind of outcome happens.
And still will incompetence befall on kerry and his supporters, who call
competence incompetence.
The ultimate
sacrifice, no less a fate than many US service personnel in Iraq.
J.
J.
Woodswun a écrit:
In article <dd3256f0.0410261643.2738d012@posting.google.com>,
abookoflife@yahoo.com (Michael Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
800,000,000 lbs of weapons have been recovered by US and Ally troops
since the Iraq war II invasion. Now that is a damper in terrorist
groups, eh?
No, since none of them were destined for terrorist groups prior to the
invasion.
Aren't you anti-terrorists happy? :-)
How 'bout that Pres. Bush?
He's a screw-up.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
