"They start that crap here and they're dead meat. We're a mean nasty
country over here.........and we
got lots of guns. :-) "
This quote (with a creepy smile) about says it all for the well-known
racist, psycho fantasist, sensation-mongeror, fear-mongeror, war-mongeror
dinkwanker who has often posted his "desire" to see all the elements of
humanity he loathes wiped out in a great conflagration. Although his
loathing/hate list is long, it includes Muslims, of course...and liberals
like myself. ;)
He's currently burning with anger and hatred state-side in CheeseLand
after doing make-believe combat "duty" in Iraq over a year ago.
Reportedly, even some cheese has melted down in close proximity to his
overheated persona.
We might expect this persistent attention-craving psycho to get "orders"
to do a special "Secret Squirrel" recon/undercover/commando raid on French
Muslim communities anytime now.
Doc
.
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
08 Nov 2005 03:02:25 PM |
|
|
Hehe :)
Now THIS is the APN I remember!
Although I like Doc - good one, Jane!
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
07 Nov 2005 10:46:04 PM |
|
|
Doc wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131413299.980257.241840@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Jane,
you get my goat, because I think there's good in you, but it's buried
underneath that blanket I talked about. It's because there's actually
hope for u, that drives me crazy. Dreamer is a lost soul. He is
destined for the fires of Mordor.
I tend to think of Jane as the "greased pig" of racism. Fairly adept at
spinning and re-spinning her own statements, the bobbing and dodging Jane
isn't easy to get a tight hold on. Insanely long threads testify to her
finely-honed skills at obfuscating her posted prejudices with various
distractions and omissions.
She may have gotten into such a long pattern of this deceptive behavior,
she actually doesn't understand she's a racist.
Can you post something specific to back up your assertion that Jane is
a racist?
Perhaps, she's even fooled herself.
I like to imagine she's got several dartboards at home, each one with a
photo of a prominent ethnic minority or an icon of a non-Christian
religion. She daily sharpens the darts and practices hitting the "bull's
eyes," wickedly cackling when she "scores."
Then, she gets guzzles down a pint of Smirnoff's in celebration.
Do you have nothing better to do than sit around dreaming up (and
posting) pathetic fantasies about people you encounter on usenet? Get a
life.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
08 Nov 2005 12:02:49 AM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131425164.103978.168890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Doc wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131413299.980257.241840@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Jane,
you get my goat, because I think there's good in you, but it's buried
underneath that blanket I talked about. It's because there's
actually
hope for u, that drives me crazy. Dreamer is a lost soul. He is
destined for the fires of Mordor.
I tend to think of Jane as the "greased pig" of racism. Fairly adept at
spinning and re-spinning her own statements, the bobbing and dodging
Jane
isn't easy to get a tight hold on. Insanely long threads testify to her
finely-honed skills at obfuscating her posted prejudices with various
distractions and omissions.
She may have gotten into such a long pattern of this deceptive
behavior,
she actually doesn't understand she's a racist.
Can you post something specific to back up your assertion that Jane is
a racist?
Do I need to document my OPINIONS? Gee...is this a court of law? If so,
I haven't been served a summons for a charge of libel, damn it! LOL...will
you try to build a case for defamation against me, lil' Stevie? Oh, yeah,
that's right, you once told me that you're really just here for some
'entertainment.' Well, here's some more 'entertainment' for ya!!
Perhaps, she's even fooled herself.
I like to imagine she's got several dartboards at home, each one with a
photo of a prominent ethnic minority or an icon of a non-Christian
religion. She daily sharpens the darts and practices hitting the
"bull's
eyes," wickedly cackling when she "scores."
Then, she gets guzzles down a pint of Smirnoff's in celebration.
Do you have nothing better to do than sit around dreaming up (and
posting) pathetic fantasies about people you encounter on usenet? Get a
life.
Since you obviously missed the boat here, and can't recognize an opinion
wrapped in satiric humor, I can understand your overreaction. But, then
again, you've been criticized by other posters for not understanding wry
humor. You must be a rather one-dimensional, humorless fella, with a life
that consists of hanging around the usenet, grinding down insignificant
details of any issue no matter how boring, and defending your frail ego
when you err. Once again, you've misjudged a post...and erred. Uh, that's
just my opinion, of course. Now, defend yourself, and present
"documentation" that my post WASN'T a joke. Where is your documentation?
LOL...
Jane's got a good sense of humor and can adeptly defend herself against
any charge, even ones that aren't "documented" and are merely opinions.
She doesn't need your asinine interference. It isn't like this is the
first time Jane's encountered insinuations, assertions, opinions she's a
racist. You get a life, Stevie, and get some humor into it, too...you
could use some creative fantasizing and dreaming...you're a pathetic
matter-of-fact mole. Keep burrowing onward!
Lucky Charms to ya,
Doc ;)
(Cant' leave me alone, can ya? Oh, that's right, I gave you "permission"
to reply. Sorry, I momentarily forgot. heeheehee...you're thinking, 'What
a fuckin' creep!' Then, why keep responding to a "creep"??? Huh??? You
once said I was a creep, but I don't have documentation. I never asked you
for documentation on your opinion of me, either. *****, so sorry. There's
no case here. It will be "dismissed." ROFL...)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
08 Nov 2005 12:51:47 AM |
|
|
Doc wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131425164.103978.168890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Doc wrote:
I tend to think of Jane as the "greased pig" of racism. Fairly adept at
spinning and re-spinning her own statements, the bobbing and dodging
Jane
isn't easy to get a tight hold on. Insanely long threads testify to her
finely-honed skills at obfuscating her posted prejudices with various
distractions and omissions.
She may have gotten into such a long pattern of this deceptive
behavior,
she actually doesn't understand she's a racist.
Can you post something specific to back up your assertion that Jane is
a racist?
Do I need to document my OPINIONS?
No -- but a fair minded person, who feels the need to label someone a
racist, would post something specific to back up his opinion. Wouldn't
he?
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
08 Nov 2005 03:40:09 AM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131432707.139777.137860@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Doc wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131425164.103978.168890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Doc wrote:
I tend to think of Jane as the "greased pig" of racism. Fairly adept
at
spinning and re-spinning her own statements, the bobbing and dodging
Jane
isn't easy to get a tight hold on. Insanely long threads testify to
her
finely-honed skills at obfuscating her posted prejudices with various
distractions and omissions.
She may have gotten into such a long pattern of this deceptive
behavior,
she actually doesn't understand she's a racist.
Can you post something specific to back up your assertion that Jane is
a racist?
Do I need to document my OPINIONS?
No -- but a fair minded person, who feels the need to label someone a
racist, would post something specific to back up his opinion. Wouldn't
he?
I take it you admot you're not fair minded then Steve?
Steven Douglas wrote (to me!)
Message-ID: <1126791729.886728.258400@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
" He's obviously anti-Jew ... but then so are you"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
08 Nov 2005 01:04:33 PM |
|
|
tw wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131432707.139777.137860@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Doc wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131425164.103978.168890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Doc wrote:
I tend to think of Jane as the "greased pig" of racism. Fairly adept
at
spinning and re-spinning her own statements, the bobbing and dodging
Jane
isn't easy to get a tight hold on. Insanely long threads testify to
her
finely-honed skills at obfuscating her posted prejudices with various
distractions and omissions.
She may have gotten into such a long pattern of this deceptive
behavior,
she actually doesn't understand she's a racist.
Can you post something specific to back up your assertion that Jane is
a racist?
Do I need to document my OPINIONS?
No -- but a fair minded person, who feels the need to label someone a
racist, would post something specific to back up his opinion. Wouldn't
he?
I take it you admot you're not fair minded then Steve?
If I hadn't apologized (twice), you'd be correct. Upon reading
something you wrote AFTER I had jumped to the wrong conclusion about
you, I corrected my mistake by apologizing. You felt the need to raise
it at some point after that, and I apologized again. Now, you have
raised it once again, and I apologize for a third time. But THREE
apologies for one mistake is my limit!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Doc" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
09 Nov 2005 06:28:33 AM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131432707.139777.137860@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Doc wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131425164.103978.168890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Doc wrote:
I tend to think of Jane as the "greased pig" of racism. Fairly adept
at
spinning and re-spinning her own statements, the bobbing and
dodging
Jane
isn't easy to get a tight hold on. Insanely long threads testify to
her
finely-honed skills at obfuscating her posted prejudices with
various
distractions and omissions.
She may have gotten into such a long pattern of this deceptive
behavior,
she actually doesn't understand she's a racist.
Can you post something specific to back up your assertion that Jane
is
a racist?
Do I need to document my OPINIONS?
No -- but a fair minded person, who feels the need to label someone a
racist, would post something specific to back up his opinion. Wouldn't
he?
Uh...let's see, you answered my question by saying I don't need to back up
my opinions, then you SUGGEST I'm not being "fair minded" when I don't
feel the need to back up my opinions.
You convoluted argumentative fart. If we're all gonna' "back up" our
copious opining on APN, it's gonna' get awfully tiring, boring, tedious,
complicated, complex, etc....but that would be really in your favorite
territory, wouldn't it? As I said, you take this forum way too seriously
and attempt to "document" your posts, your opinions, your assertions, as
if you were scared your ideas can't stand on their own as simple
opinions...which makes me think you're insecure in your opining here. Are
you always afraid someone will tear down your opinions, and therefore you
feel the need to back them up? Jeez...Google must be smokin' from your
searches, fella. LOL...
Doc :))
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
09 Nov 2005 05:42:41 PM |
|
|
Doc wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131432707.139777.137860@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Doc wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131425164.103978.168890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Doc wrote:
I tend to think of Jane as the "greased pig" of racism. Fairly adept
at
spinning and re-spinning her own statements, the bobbing and
dodging
Jane
isn't easy to get a tight hold on. Insanely long threads testify to
her
finely-honed skills at obfuscating her posted prejudices with
various
distractions and omissions.
She may have gotten into such a long pattern of this deceptive
behavior,
she actually doesn't understand she's a racist.
Can you post something specific to back up your assertion that Jane
is
a racist?
Do I need to document my OPINIONS?
No -- but a fair minded person, who feels the need to label someone a
racist, would post something specific to back up his opinion. Wouldn't
he?
Uh...let's see, you answered my question by saying I don't need to back up
my opinions, then you SUGGEST I'm not being "fair minded" when I don't
feel the need to back up my opinions.
Yes, so? If you don't feel the need to back up your opinions when
someone asks you to, and you stand by those opinions with no evidence
to back you up, I would submit that you were being unfair.
You convoluted argumentative fart. If we're all gonna' "back up" our
copious opining on APN, it's gonna' get awfully tiring, boring, tedious,
complicated, complex, etc....but that would be really in your favorite
territory, wouldn't it? As I said, you take this forum way too seriously
and attempt to "document" your posts, your opinions, your assertions, as
if you were scared your ideas can't stand on their own as simple
opinions...which makes me think you're insecure in your opining here. Are
you always afraid someone will tear down your opinions, and therefore you
feel the need to back them up?
Apparently you haven't noticed the times I HAVE posted opinions without
backing them up, and I get a "Cite please?" from some of the regular
posters here. So when I don't post a cite to back up my opinion, I'm
told to back it up. And when I DO back it up, I get this crap from you:
Jeez...Google must be smokin' from your searches, fella. LOL...
What's it to you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
11 Nov 2005 07:32:34 AM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131579761.792934.278380@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Doc wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131432707.139777.137860@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Doc wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131425164.103978.168890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Doc wrote:
I tend to think of Jane as the "greased pig" of racism. Fairly
adept
at
spinning and re-spinning her own statements, the bobbing and
dodging
Jane
isn't easy to get a tight hold on. Insanely long threads testify
to
her
finely-honed skills at obfuscating her posted prejudices with
various
distractions and omissions.
She may have gotten into such a long pattern of this deceptive
behavior,
she actually doesn't understand she's a racist.
Can you post something specific to back up your assertion that
Jane
is
a racist?
Do I need to document my OPINIONS?
No -- but a fair minded person, who feels the need to label someone a
racist, would post something specific to back up his opinion.
Wouldn't
he?
OH YEAH, YOU'RE SUCH A SUPERIOR PERSONALITY. SO 'FAIR-MINDED' AND
ALL...YOU LYING SACK OF PSYCHOTIC *****. Why do you think anyone
cares about whatever personal standards you want to apply to other posters
here, and think they should abide by them, you full-of-yourself,
head-up-your-***** little infant of futile argumentativeness? ROFL...
Uh...let's see, you answered my question by saying I don't need to back
up
my opinions, then you SUGGEST I'm not being "fair minded" when I don't
feel the need to back up my opinions.
Yes, so? If you don't feel the need to back up your opinions when
someone asks you to, and you stand by those opinions with no evidence
to back you up, I would submit that you were being unfair.
Talking to you is like trying to flush a toilet that keeps backing up. As
I said, dipshit, you take this usenet ***** far too seriously. Loosen your
tight rectum up and relax that sphincter muscle for a change. Go with the
flow. I don't feel the need to back up anything I opine about here. You go
ahead and feel the need, whether occasionally or not. And, no one has to
validate their opinions to you or anyone else here. Who the ***** are you,
Stevie, but an infantile personality who seeks a "win" over someone on
some trivial point that's mainly important to YOU. Go ***** yourself,
stupid. You 'submit' whatever egotistical ***** you want. Don't expect it
will make any impression on someone who knows what a obsessive two-faced
corkhead you are. (Submit sarcastic laughter here!)
You convoluted argumentative fart. If we're all gonna' "back up" our
copious opining on APN, it's gonna' get awfully tiring, boring,
tedious,
complicated, complex, etc....but that would be really in your favorite
territory, wouldn't it? As I said, you take this forum way too
seriously
and attempt to "document" your posts, your opinions, your assertions,
as
if you were scared your ideas can't stand on their own as simple
opinions...which makes me think you're insecure in your opining here.
Are
you always afraid someone will tear down your opinions, and therefore
you
feel the need to back them up?
Apparently you haven't noticed the times I HAVE posted opinions without
backing them up, and I get a "Cite please?" from some of the regular
posters here. So when I don't post a cite to back up my opinion, I'm
told to back it up. And when I DO back it up, I get this crap from you:
I haven't paid much attention to you, and apparently not anywhere near
the attention you've paid to my posts. As I said...you're tedious, unduly
argumentative, and obsessively seeking something to fill the "hole" in
your short-sided personality. You'll not find it here with me. Have you
found it yet? Nooo, but keep fishing. Who are you to make the rule here
that, because you feel this need to respond and back up your precious
opinions, that the rest of us need to follow YOUR rule? You little fascist
*****. Why is it that you feel the driving need to keep arguing? Why do you
persist in arguing about every little thing here, you closet racist
*****? How many Arab-American friends did you say you had? LOL...if we
were back in the 60s, how many Afro-American friends would you have had?
Or, farther back, how many Chinese friends would you have known? Of
course, that's a transparent trick to present a false image that you're
not racist and that's not fooling anyone who's been around the block.
It's a testament to your continued chickenshit racist attitude here, your
hypocrisy that's laid bare for all to amuse themselves with. You're on the
wrong political side for sympathy for minorities, fuckwit, and you're not
fooling me one bit. RACIST *****! Now...does that lay it on the line
for ya? I hope so. Now, you can blow your top, spew an obscenity or two,
and stomp around here in righteous indignation, again. LOL...I've grown
tired of your pseudo-intellectualism. Let's have it out good and dirty,
diddle brains. Drop your drawers and let me have a crack at your crack,
mate.
Jeez...Google must be smokin' from your searches, fella. LOL...
What's it to you?
Nothing much...it was sarcastic humor, you humorless *****.
LOL...still, Google must be getting tired of you by now. "Oh *****, here's
that clown trying frantically to back his opinions up again. Doesn't he
have anything else better to do?"
Doc ;))
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
11 Nov 2005 11:12:14 AM |
|
|
Doc wrote:
Why is it that you feel the driving need to keep arguing?
Probably for the same reason you do.
Why do you persist in arguing about every little thing
here, you closet racist *****?
Do you understand what the term, reverse form of racism, means? It
applies to folks who, in trying to appear socially to others as
non-racists, go overboard in their praise, their unquestioning attitude
toward minorities, frequently making it a social habit to tell others
how they support minorities. People with discernment can spot these
"reverse racists" who are social showboats, while privately harboring
racism. Sounds an awful lot like you, doesn't it, you closet racist
*****?
How many Arab-American friends did you say you had? LOL...if we
were back in the 60s, how many Afro-American friends would you have had?
Or, farther back, how many Chinese friends would you have known? Of
course, that's a transparent trick to present a false image that you're
not racist and that's not fooling anyone who's been around the block.
I no longer feel the need to defend myself to you, you warped old man.
My first impression of you was that you were a true intellect, but
after all the strange sexual fantasies you posted under invented ID's,
I began to see you for the sick, twisted, and perverted individual that
you are. Now, in another post, you're fixated on my crack. Seek
professional help if you haven't already. And in the meantime, go ahead
and judge me if it makes you happy. I don't care. At this point, you're
an irrelevancy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
11 Nov 2005 02:14:40 PM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131729134.223240.60470@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Doc wrote:
Why is it that you feel the driving need to keep arguing?
Probably for the same reason you do.
You mean you endlessly, trivially argue to get your little ***** up? I get
immense orgasms myself. How about you? LOL...
Why do you persist in arguing about every little thing
here, you closet racist *****?
Do you understand what the term, reverse form of racism, means? It
applies to folks who, in trying to appear socially to others as
non-racists, go overboard in their praise, their unquestioning attitude
toward minorities, frequently making it a social habit to tell others
how they support minorities. People with discernment can spot these
"reverse racists" who are social showboats, while privately harboring
racism. Sounds an awful lot like you, doesn't it, you closet racist
*****?
ROFLMFAO ! Gee, I judged you unfairly, Stevie, you DO have a sense of
humor!
How many Arab-American friends did you say you had? LOL...if we
were back in the 60s, how many Afro-American friends would you have
had?
Or, farther back, how many Chinese friends would you have known? Of
course, that's a transparent trick to present a false image that you're
not racist and that's not fooling anyone who's been around the block.
I no longer feel the need to defend myself to you, you warped old man.
My first impression of you was that you were a true intellect, but
after all the strange sexual fantasies you posted under invented ID's,
I began to see you for the sick, twisted, and perverted individual that
you are. Now, in another post, you're fixated on my crack. Seek
professional help if you haven't already. And in the meantime, go ahead
and judge me if it makes you happy. I don't care. At this point, you're
an irrelevancy.
Aaaah, don't be that way, Stevie, I'm just a old dope-smoking hippie who
hasn't had sex, like you, for many years. Try to have some understanding
and pity. Think of how the stress of your lonely life with no sexual
contact has affected your personality. Remember, we best understand others
by examining ourselves, introspectively. Look deep inside yourself, and
repeat, "I am what I criticize."
It may help. Good luck.
Doc ;))
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "eric" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
08 Nov 2005 12:16:29 PM |
|
|
Steven why don't you ask Jane if she thinks Mohammed was a pedophile?
The answer she gives, and her positions on a number of issues,
including siding with Dreamer (who no one questions is racist) are
telltale signs. If Jane ever had the grapes to look beyond her
Security Blanket, and see herself in the cold hard light of reality, I
think she would change. Dreamer wouldn't.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
08 Nov 2005 01:07:32 PM |
|
|
eric wrote:
Steven why don't you ask Jane if she thinks Mohammed was a pedophile?
What does that have to do with racism? She has a specific opinion about
one man's interaction with a nine year old girl. She is entitled to her
opinion, and I happen to share her opinion -- which has nothing to do
with racism.
.
|
|
|
| User: "eric" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
08 Nov 2005 01:22:21 PM |
|
|
Certainly denigrating, and defiling statements about the most reverred
religious figure to over a billion people is more than damning evidence
of racism. This isn't the only statement that Jane has made which
leads me to this conclusion...but this alone is sufficient.
Remember the Apostle whom Jesus loved? References in the Bible to St.
John whom Jesus loved leads some to make anti-Christian remarks that
Jesus was Homosexual...same thing calling Mohammed a pedophile. It is
hateful, it is repugnant, and it IS RACIST. If you deny that, then
that's your opinion, and my opinion would be that your opinion is
fallacious.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
08 Nov 2005 04:24:47 PM |
|
|
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131477741.029890.24970@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Certainly denigrating, and defiling statements about the most reverred
religious figure to over a billion people is more than damning evidence
of racism. This isn't the only statement that Jane has made which
leads me to this conclusion...but this alone is sufficient.
Remember the Apostle whom Jesus loved? References in the Bible to St.
John whom Jesus loved leads some to make anti-Christian remarks that
Jesus was Homosexual...same thing calling Mohammed a pedophile. It is
hateful, it is repugnant, and it IS RACIST. If you deny that, then
that's your opinion, and my opinion would be that your opinion is
fallacious.
If Jesus was a homosexual, which I doubt, then it was consensual sex between
adults. Different than sex between an old geezer (which Mohammed was at the
time) and a nine-year-old girl.
BTW, I don't have any more respect for Joseph Smith's "revelations of
convenience" than I have for Mohammed.
Also, BTW, why has no one but tw ever said word one to Uncle Wally about his
anti-Jewish comments, yet everyone jumps on Steven and myself for commenting
on Islam, not the Muslim people.
Jane
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
08 Nov 2005 01:31:18 PM |
|
|
eric wrote:
Certainly denigrating, and defiling statements about the most reverred
religious figure to over a billion people is more than damning evidence
of racism. This isn't the only statement that Jane has made which
leads me to this conclusion...but this alone is sufficient.
Remember the Apostle whom Jesus loved? References in the Bible to St.
John whom Jesus loved leads some to make anti-Christian remarks that
Jesus was Homosexual...same thing calling Mohammed a pedophile. It is
hateful, it is repugnant, and it IS RACIST. If you deny that, then
that's your opinion, and my opinion would be that your opinion is
fallacious.
Is Christian a race? Is Muslim a race? Which race are they?
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
09 Nov 2005 05:18:15 AM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131478278.654669.224620@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
eric wrote:
Certainly denigrating, and defiling statements about the most reverred
religious figure to over a billion people is more than damning evidence
of racism. This isn't the only statement that Jane has made which
leads me to this conclusion...but this alone is sufficient.
Remember the Apostle whom Jesus loved? References in the Bible to St.
John whom Jesus loved leads some to make anti-Christian remarks that
Jesus was Homosexual...same thing calling Mohammed a pedophile. It is
hateful, it is repugnant, and it IS RACIST. If you deny that, then
that's your opinion, and my opinion would be that your opinion is
fallacious.
Is Christian a race? Is Muslim a race?
It appears so, according to the secondary definition of a word so loaded as
to be virtually useless..
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=race
"A group of people united or classified together on the basis of common
history, nationality, or geographic distribution: e.g. the German race."
Which race are they?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "eric" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
08 Nov 2005 02:11:04 PM |
|
|
Well, Duh... Obviously not. Yet, how many KKK of smalltown Alabama
do you think spoke highly of the local Rabbi?
If this is too deep for you Steven, just say so. Maybe I could dumb it
down for you
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
08 Nov 2005 02:14:32 PM |
|
|
eric wrote:
Well, Duh... Obviously not. Yet, how many KKK of smalltown Alabama
do you think spoke highly of the local Rabbi?
Changing the subject now? The Jewish people are a race.
If this is too deep for you Steven, just say so. Maybe I could dumb it
down for you
No need, I'm still waiting for you to explain why Jane's opinon of one
specific man, namely Muhammad, is racist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
09 Nov 2005 05:23:04 AM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131480872.337841.250790@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
eric wrote:
Well, Duh... Obviously not. Yet, how many KKK of smalltown Alabama
do you think spoke highly of the local Rabbi?
Changing the subject now? The Jewish people are a race.
Only in the secondary definition of the term, which is obviously not what
you mean. The Jewish people are NOT a race in the sense of :
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=race
"A local geographic or global human population distinguished as a more or
less distinct group by genetically transmitted physical characteristics. "
e.g. the Sephardi , Ashkenazi and Mizrahi are all from different
geographical areas and have distinctly different "genetically transmitted
physical characteristics".
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "eric" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
08 Nov 2005 02:23:28 PM |
|
|
Same Subject, Steven. You just fell into the deep end of the pool and
are floundering. Tell you what, I'll set up a new thread just for u
regarding the definition of a racist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
08 Nov 2005 02:48:08 PM |
|
|
eric wrote:
Same Subject, Steven. You just fell into the deep end of the pool and
are floundering. Tell you what, I'll set up a new thread just for u
regarding the definition of a racist.
And your definition does not apply to me. Nice try, though.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "eric" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
08 Nov 2005 12:18:04 PM |
|
|
I agree that Jane doesn't see herself as a racist. But she sure quacks
like one.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
08 Nov 2005 03:11:15 PM |
|
|
LOL! This is funny, I must admit. The *image* is what made me laugh:
"Throwing darts then guzzling smirnoff" - hehe.
And like I told Jane when her comment to you made me laugh, I like both
of you, I'm only laughing at the digs you two are coming up with.
Now THIS is the APN I remember! . :)
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
08 Nov 2005 03:11:15 PM |
|
|
LOL! This is funny, I must admit. The *image* is what made me laugh:
"Throwing darts then guzzling smirnoff" - hehe.
And like I told Jane when her comment to you made me laugh, I like both
of you, I'm only laughing at the digs you two are coming up with.
Now THIS is the APN I remember! . :)
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
08 Nov 2005 07:26:58 AM |
|
|
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131413299.980257.241840@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Jane,
you get my goat, because I think there's good in you, but it's buried
underneath that blanket I talked about. It's because there's actually
hope for u, that drives me crazy. Dreamer is a lost soul. He is
destined for the fires of Mordor.
Of course there is good in me! And I don't think it is hidden, either.
And I would still vote for Mike Harris in a nanosecond. (I bring that up
because that was when you decided to dislike me way back when...when I
mentioned my political stripes)
Jane
.
|
|
|
| User: "eric" |
|
| Title: Re: Alert -- Dinkwanker in another meltdown!! |
08 Nov 2005 12:10:27 PM |
|
|
No. I started to dislike what you say, when I realized that under
certain circumstances you just can't allow yourself to be honest with
yourself.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
