Americans expect nuclear attack
Author says Iran poses imminent threat
Posted: March 31, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
While a new national poll finds 52 percent of Americans think a
nuclear attack is likely by 2010, the author of a new book on the
Iranian bomb says the threat posed by that regime is imminent.
The survey, conducted by AP-Ipsos, found two-thirds of Americans
believe no nation should have nuclear weapons – including the United
States.
The poll found 44 percent said they frequently or occasionally worry
about a terrorist attack using nuclear weapons, while 55 percent said
they rarely or never do.
WorldNetDaily columnist Jerome Corsi, author of the newly released
"Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American
Politicians," published by WND Books, says he is "pushing the alarm
button" as the nuclear threat posed to the United States and Israel is
"imminent."
Corsi believes that the greatest nuclear threat is posed by the
Iranian regime.
"Iran continues to display the characteristics of a rogue regime
actively pursuing nuclear weapons, willing to both defy and deceive
attempts at international control," he said. "Clearly stated, Iran has
been playing the world for a fool."
.
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
31 Mar 2005 08:44:41 AM |
|
|
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1112279550.b1996715cb05f829b92ac387f1ce0061@teranews...
Americans expect nuclear attack
Author says Iran poses imminent threat
Posted: March 31, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
While a new national poll finds 52 percent of Americans think a
nuclear attack is likely by 2010,
That's around the same percentage that believe UFOs have landed and aliens
are among them, I believe. Slightly less than the percentage that belived
the USSR was the evil empire of Zog or who think they're going to be
raptured.
the author of a new book on the
Iranian bomb says the threat posed by that regime is imminent.
Ah! Another book plug.
<snip advertising>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
31 Mar 2005 09:15:34 AM |
|
|
tw wrote:
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1112279550.b1996715cb05f829b92ac387f1ce0061@teranews...
Americans expect nuclear attack
Author says Iran poses imminent threat
Posted: March 31, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
While a new national poll finds 52 percent of Americans think a
nuclear attack is likely by 2010,
That's around the same percentage that believe UFOs have landed and aliens
are among them, I believe. Slightly less than the percentage that belived
the USSR was the evil empire of Zog or who think they're going to be
raptured.
...and a whole lot less of a percentage of Republican voters that, as
recently as Oct 2004, were firmly of the opinion that Saddam was
responsible for 9/11.
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
31 Mar 2005 10:33:58 AM |
|
|
"Absolute Zero" <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:d2h3ro$rp1$3@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk...
tw wrote:
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1112279550.b1996715cb05f829b92ac387f1ce0061@teranews...
Americans expect nuclear attack
Author says Iran poses imminent threat
Posted: March 31, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
While a new national poll finds 52 percent of Americans think a
nuclear attack is likely by 2010,
That's around the same percentage that believe UFOs have landed and
aliens
are among them, I believe. Slightly less than the percentage that
belived
the USSR was the evil empire of Zog or who think they're going to be
raptured.
..and a whole lot less of a percentage of Republican voters that, as
recently as Oct 2004, were firmly of the opinion that Saddam was
responsible for 9/11.
-A
The spider hole Saddam was found in was actually the entrance to an
incredibly long tunnel Iraqis had dug under the Atlantic and all the way
to the basement of the WTC. Even WorldNutDaily hasn't yet uncovered this
amazing top-secret story.
Doc ;p
.
|
|
|
| User: "H Head" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
31 Mar 2005 02:35:15 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:33:58 -0800, "Doc" <goblowmoreshit@baboons.com>
wrote:
"Absolute Zero" <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:d2h3ro$rp1$3@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk...
tw wrote:
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1112279550.b1996715cb05f829b92ac387f1ce0061@teranews...
Americans expect nuclear attack
Author says Iran poses imminent threat
Posted: March 31, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
While a new national poll finds 52 percent of Americans think a
nuclear attack is likely by 2010,
That's around the same percentage that believe UFOs have landed and
aliens
are among them, I believe. Slightly less than the percentage that
belived
the USSR was the evil empire of Zog or who think they're going to be
raptured.
..and a whole lot less of a percentage of Republican voters that, as
recently as Oct 2004, were firmly of the opinion that Saddam was
responsible for 9/11.
-A
The spider hole Saddam was found in was actually the entrance to an
incredibly long tunnel Iraqis had dug under the Atlantic and all the way
to the basement of the WTC. Even WorldNutDaily hasn't yet uncovered this
amazing top-secret story.
Doc ;p
Oh they HAVE! But a conspiracy is keeping them from posting the
truth. I could list the groups involved, but it is much better (for
this group, anyway) to just say that the conspiracy involves the usual
suspects!!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
31 Mar 2005 08:05:45 PM |
|
|
The spider hole Saddam was found in was actually the entrance to an
incredibly long tunnel Iraqis had dug under the Atlantic and all the way
to the basement of the WTC. Even WorldNutDaily hasn't yet uncovered this
amazing top-secret story.
Doc ;p
Oh they HAVE! But a conspiracy is keeping them from posting the
truth. I could list the groups involved, but it is much better (for
this group, anyway) to just say that the conspiracy involves the usual
suspects!!!!
LIBERALS!!!!!!!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Su Zanadu" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
31 Mar 2005 07:43:36 PM |
|
|
tw wrote:
While a new national poll finds 52
percent of Americans think a nuclear
attack is likely by 2010,
That's around the same percentage that
believe UFOs have landed and aliens
are among them, I believe. Slightly less
than the percentage that belived the
USSR was the evil empire of Zog or
who think they're going to be raptured.
Also around the SAME percentage that voted for the monkey! :)
Hahahahahah!
SuZanne
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "shannonr" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
31 Mar 2005 03:25:58 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Americans expect nuclear attack
Author says Iran poses imminent threat
Posted: March 31, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
While a new national poll finds 52 percent of Americans think a
nuclear attack is likely by 2010, the author of a new book on the
Iranian bomb says the threat posed by that regime is imminent.
The survey, conducted by AP-Ipsos, found two-thirds of Americans
believe no nation should have nuclear weapons - including the
United
States.
I'm positively surprised by that finding. Maybe there's hope for the
human race after all.
<snip>
Shannon
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
31 Mar 2005 04:37:33 PM |
|
|
shannonr wrote:
itwill@happen.com wrote:
Americans expect nuclear attack
Author says Iran poses imminent threat
Posted: March 31, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
While a new national poll finds 52 percent of Americans think a
nuclear attack is likely by 2010, the author of a new book on the
Iranian bomb says the threat posed by that regime is imminent.
The survey, conducted by AP-Ipsos, found two-thirds of Americans
believe no nation should have nuclear weapons - including the
United
States.
I'm positively surprised by that finding. Maybe there's hope for the
human race after all.
<snip>
Shannon
I dunno, I think it's pretty darned unrealistic to think anyone will put
the genie back in the bottle at this late date. Besides, they're
focusing on the mechanism, not the cause.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
31 Mar 2005 04:27:51 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Americans expect nuclear attack
Author says Iran poses imminent threat
Posted: March 31, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
While a new national poll finds 52 percent of Americans think a
nuclear attack is likely by 2010, the author of a new book on the
Iranian bomb says the threat posed by that regime is imminent.
The survey, conducted by AP-Ipsos, found two-thirds of Americans
believe no nation should have nuclear weapons - including the
United
States.
The poll found 44 percent said they frequently or occasionally worry
about a terrorist attack using nuclear weapons, while 55 percent said
they rarely or never do.
Seeing as Iran is centrally located on the planet much revolves around
them, now just WW1 saw at the start machine guns and finished with
aircraft and tanks, and WW2 saw it start with aircraft and tanks and
finished with nukes and missiles, do you honestly think after 60 years
it is not unreasonable to expect a WW3 to not start with at least
nukes, however that is not point at which we are at.
LB
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Charly the Bastard" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
04 Apr 2005 09:22:28 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Americans expect nuclear attack
Author says Iran poses imminent threat
Posted: March 31, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
While a new national poll finds 52 percent of Americans think a
nuclear attack is likely by 2010, the author of a new book on the
Iranian bomb says the threat posed by that regime is imminent.
The survey, conducted by AP-Ipsos, found two-thirds of Americans
believe no nation should have nuclear weapons – including the United
States.
The poll found 44 percent said they frequently or occasionally worry
about a terrorist attack using nuclear weapons, while 55 percent said
they rarely or never do.
WorldNetDaily columnist Jerome Corsi, author of the newly released
"Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American
Politicians," published by WND Books, says he is "pushing the alarm
button" as the nuclear threat posed to the United States and Israel is
"imminent."
Corsi believes that the greatest nuclear threat is posed by the
Iranian regime.
"Iran continues to display the characteristics of a rogue regime
actively pursuing nuclear weapons, willing to both defy and deceive
attempts at international control," he said. "Clearly stated, Iran has
been playing the world for a fool."
Big deal. We've got 'em, they've got 'em, sooner or later everyone will
have 'em. I live three miles from Ground Zero for a first strike target.
I've grown up with the ever-present threat that tomorrow could be canceled
by the push of a button. No one uses them for real, the counterstroke from
the unreachable inventory would leave the agressor's country looking like
the back side of the Moon, and uninhabitable for decades at least. That's
called Deterrance, the sure and certain knowledge of total anihilation as
a response to 'new-Q-lur' agression. The Navy's on the job, I sleep easy.
Charly
.
|
|
|
| User: "MonsieurStat" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
04 Apr 2005 08:28:15 PM |
|
|
"Charly the *****" <nitecrawler7@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:42514DA0.E65CA3E5@worldnet.att.net...
itwill@happen.com wrote:
Americans expect nuclear attack
Author says Iran poses imminent threat
Posted: March 31, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
While a new national poll finds 52 percent of Americans think a
nuclear attack is likely by 2010, the author of a new book on the
Iranian bomb says the threat posed by that regime is imminent.
The survey, conducted by AP-Ipsos, found two-thirds of Americans
believe no nation should have nuclear weapons - including the United
States.
The poll found 44 percent said they frequently or occasionally worry
about a terrorist attack using nuclear weapons, while 55 percent said
they rarely or never do.
WorldNetDaily columnist Jerome Corsi, author of the newly released
"Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American
Politicians," published by WND Books, says he is "pushing the alarm
button" as the nuclear threat posed to the United States and Israel is
"imminent."
Corsi believes that the greatest nuclear threat is posed by the
Iranian regime.
"Iran continues to display the characteristics of a rogue regime
actively pursuing nuclear weapons, willing to both defy and deceive
attempts at international control," he said. "Clearly stated, Iran has
been playing the world for a fool."
Big deal. We've got 'em, they've got 'em, sooner or later everyone will
have 'em. I live three miles from Ground Zero for a first strike target.
I've grown up with the ever-present threat that tomorrow could be canceled
by the push of a button. No one uses them for real, the counterstroke from
the unreachable inventory would leave the agressor's country looking like
the back side of the Moon, and uninhabitable for decades at least. That's
called Deterrance, the sure and certain knowledge of total anihilation as
a response to 'new-Q-lur' agression. The Navy's on the job, I sleep easy.
Maybe you should wake up. On a typical month, the Pentagon's computers go
off 5-6 times with nuclear alerts. Some soldiers run around, check a couple
of things, and declare it a false alarm. The probability of one of these
false alarms turning into a full nuclear war is indeed very low. But you
know what happens when a low probability event happens over and over
again...
Stat.
Charly
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
06 Apr 2005 11:59:00 AM |
|
|
Charley the ***** wrote:
itwill@happen.com wrote:
Americans expect nuclear attack
Author says Iran poses imminent threat
Posted: March 31, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
While a new national poll finds 52 percent of Americans think a
nuclear attack is likely by 2010, the author of a new book on the
Iranian bomb says the threat posed by that regime is imminent.
The survey, conducted by AP-Ipsos, found two-thirds of Americans
believe no nation should have nuclear weapons – including the United
States.
The poll found 44 percent said they frequently or occasionally worry
about a terrorist attack using nuclear weapons, while 55 percent said
they rarely or never do.
WorldNetDaily columnist Jerome Corsi, author of the newly released
"Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American
Politicians," published by WND Books, says he is "pushing the alarm
button" as the nuclear threat posed to the United States and Israel is
"imminent."
Corsi believes that the greatest nuclear threat is posed by the
Iranian regime.
"Iran continues to display the characteristics of a rogue regime
actively pursuing nuclear weapons, willing to both defy and deceive
attempts at international control," he said. "Clearly stated, Iran has
been playing the world for a fool."
Big deal. We've got 'em, they've got 'em, sooner or later everyone will
have 'em.
That attitude will get us all killed.
I live three miles from Ground Zero for a first strike target.
I've grown up with the ever-present threat that tomorrow could be canceled
by the push of a button. No one uses them for real, the counterstroke from
the unreachable inventory would leave the agressor's country looking like
the back side of the Moon, and uninhabitable for decades at least. That's
called Deterrance,
That you think Terrorists care about retaliation shows that you
haven't a clue about them.
Lke I said above, your attitude will get us all killed.
the sure and certain knowledge of total anihilation as
a response to 'new-Q-lur' agression. The Navy's on the job, I sleep easy.
Charly
Islamic Terrorists don't give a *****, that you don't understand this
shows that you do not understand the situation.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charly the Bastard" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
13 Apr 2005 08:05:32 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Charley the ***** wrote:
wrote:
Americans expect nuclear attack
Author says Iran poses imminent threat
Posted: March 31, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
While a new national poll finds 52 percent of Americans think a
nuclear attack is likely by 2010, the author of a new book on the
Iranian bomb says the threat posed by that regime is imminent.
The survey, conducted by AP-Ipsos, found two-thirds of Americans
believe no nation should have nuclear weapons – including the United
States.
The poll found 44 percent said they frequently or occasionally worry
about a terrorist attack using nuclear weapons, while 55 percent said
they rarely or never do.
WorldNetDaily columnist Jerome Corsi, author of the newly released
"Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American
Politicians," published by WND Books, says he is "pushing the alarm
button" as the nuclear threat posed to the United States and Israel is
"imminent."
Corsi believes that the greatest nuclear threat is posed by the
Iranian regime.
"Iran continues to display the characteristics of a rogue regime
actively pursuing nuclear weapons, willing to both defy and deceive
attempts at international control," he said. "Clearly stated, Iran has
been playing the world for a fool."
Big deal. We've got 'em, they've got 'em, sooner or later everyone will
have 'em.
That attitude will get us all killed.
I live three miles from Ground Zero for a first strike target.
I've grown up with the ever-present threat that tomorrow could be canceled
by the push of a button. No one uses them for real, the counterstroke from
the unreachable inventory would leave the agressor's country looking like
the back side of the Moon, and uninhabitable for decades at least. That's
called Deterrance,
That you think Terrorists care about retaliation shows that you
haven't a clue about them.
Lke I said above, your attitude will get us all killed.
the sure and certain knowledge of total anihilation as
a response to 'new-Q-lur' agression. The Navy's on the job, I sleep easy.
Charly
Islamic Terrorists don't give a *****, that you don't understand this
shows that you do not understand the situation.
Tony
Oh, I understand it well enough. I also understand that stopping someone
willing to exchange their life for mission success is next to impossible. I
just hope that they understand that we don't give a ***** either. Personally, I
would have turned the keys on them on 12 SEP 2001, but fortunately for them, I
don't get to make that call. The reality is that the genie is well and truely
out of the bottle, and sooner or later, every organization with schemes of
domination will acquire some. Since our Generated and Veneered Leaders don't
have the nads to make the Hard Decisions, we're stuck with this eternal cycle
of Fear and Repression, which suits the dominating organizations quite well.
Charly
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
13 Apr 2005 08:39:03 AM |
|
|
Charly the ***** wrote:
itwill@happen.com wrote:
Charley the ***** wrote:
itwill@happen.com wrote:
Americans expect nuclear attack
Author says Iran poses imminent threat
Posted: March 31, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
While a new national poll finds 52 percent of Americans think a
nuclear attack is likely by 2010, the author of a new book on the
Iranian bomb says the threat posed by that regime is imminent.
The survey, conducted by AP-Ipsos, found two-thirds of Americans
believe no nation should have nuclear weapons – including the United
States.
The poll found 44 percent said they frequently or occasionally worry
about a terrorist attack using nuclear weapons, while 55 percent said
they rarely or never do.
WorldNetDaily columnist Jerome Corsi, author of the newly released
"Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American
Politicians," published by WND Books, says he is "pushing the alarm
button" as the nuclear threat posed to the United States and Israel is
"imminent."
Corsi believes that the greatest nuclear threat is posed by the
Iranian regime.
"Iran continues to display the characteristics of a rogue regime
actively pursuing nuclear weapons, willing to both defy and deceive
attempts at international control," he said. "Clearly stated, Iran has
been playing the world for a fool."
Big deal. We've got 'em, they've got 'em, sooner or later everyone will
have 'em.
That attitude will get us all killed.
I live three miles from Ground Zero for a first strike target.
I've grown up with the ever-present threat that tomorrow could be canceled
by the push of a button. No one uses them for real, the counterstroke from
the unreachable inventory would leave the agressor's country looking like
the back side of the Moon, and uninhabitable for decades at least. That's
called Deterrance,
That you think Terrorists care about retaliation shows that you
haven't a clue about them.
Lke I said above, your attitude will get us all killed.
the sure and certain knowledge of total anihilation as
a response to 'new-Q-lur' agression. The Navy's on the job, I sleep easy.
Charly
Islamic Terrorists don't give a *****, that you don't understand this
shows that you do not understand the situation.
Tony
Oh, I understand it well enough. I also understand that stopping someone
willing to exchange their life for mission success is next to impossible. I
just hope that they understand that we don't give a ***** either. Personally, I
would have turned the keys on them on 12 SEP 2001, but fortunately for them, I
don't get to make that call.
Fortunately for everyone.
Do you get a trouser-tent when you think about launching nukes? It seems
to figure in about ~80% of your posts, Mr Ripper.
-A
The reality is that the genie is well and truely
out of the bottle, and sooner or later, every organization with schemes of
domination will acquire some. Since our Generated and Veneered Leaders don't
have the nads to make the Hard Decisions, we're stuck with this eternal cycle
of Fear and Repression, which suits the dominating organizations quite well.
Charly
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charly the Bastard" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
14 Apr 2005 08:01:54 AM |
|
|
Absolute Zero wrote:
Charly the ***** wrote:
itwill@happen.com wrote:
Charley the ***** wrote:
itwill@happen.com wrote:
Americans expect nuclear attack
Author says Iran poses imminent threat
Posted: March 31, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
While a new national poll finds 52 percent of Americans think a
nuclear attack is likely by 2010, the author of a new book on the
Iranian bomb says the threat posed by that regime is imminent.
The survey, conducted by AP-Ipsos, found two-thirds of Americans
believe no nation should have nuclear weapons – including the United
States.
The poll found 44 percent said they frequently or occasionally worry
about a terrorist attack using nuclear weapons, while 55 percent said
they rarely or never do.
WorldNetDaily columnist Jerome Corsi, author of the newly released
"Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American
Politicians," published by WND Books, says he is "pushing the alarm
button" as the nuclear threat posed to the United States and Israel is
"imminent."
Corsi believes that the greatest nuclear threat is posed by the
Iranian regime.
"Iran continues to display the characteristics of a rogue regime
actively pursuing nuclear weapons, willing to both defy and deceive
attempts at international control," he said. "Clearly stated, Iran has
been playing the world for a fool."
Big deal. We've got 'em, they've got 'em, sooner or later everyone will
have 'em.
That attitude will get us all killed.
I live three miles from Ground Zero for a first strike target.
I've grown up with the ever-present threat that tomorrow could be canceled
by the push of a button. No one uses them for real, the counterstroke from
the unreachable inventory would leave the agressor's country looking like
the back side of the Moon, and uninhabitable for decades at least. That's
called Deterrance,
That you think Terrorists care about retaliation shows that you
haven't a clue about them.
Lke I said above, your attitude will get us all killed.
the sure and certain knowledge of total anihilation as
a response to 'new-Q-lur' agression. The Navy's on the job, I sleep easy.
Charly
Islamic Terrorists don't give a *****, that you don't understand this
shows that you do not understand the situation.
Tony
Oh, I understand it well enough. I also understand that stopping someone
willing to exchange their life for mission success is next to impossible. I
just hope that they understand that we don't give a ***** either. Personally, I
would have turned the keys on them on 12 SEP 2001, but fortunately for them, I
don't get to make that call.
Fortunately for everyone.
Do you get a trouser-tent when you think about launching nukes? It seems
to figure in about ~80% of your posts, Mr Ripper.
-A
Nope. But weighed against all the other postage around here, it's a small reminder
to the global audience that we still have them, they're deployed, ready to fly, and
we've used them before. Back us far enough into a corner and we'll use them again.
For all their bluster, the other nuclear powers are still virgins. That's the Big
Stick that we carry. Using strategic weapons is not as 'unthinkable' as the Liberal
media would like us to believe.
C
.
|
|
|
| User: "MonsieurStat" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
14 Apr 2005 09:09:39 PM |
|
|
Charly the ***** wrote:
Absolute Zero wrote:
Charly the ***** wrote:
itwill@happen.com wrote:
Charley the ***** wrote:
itwill@happen.com wrote:
Americans expect nuclear attack
Author says Iran poses imminent threat
Posted: March 31, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
While a new national poll finds 52 percent of Americans think a
nuclear attack is likely by 2010, the author of a new book on the
Iranian bomb says the threat posed by that regime is imminent.
The survey, conducted by AP-Ipsos, found two-thirds of Americans
believe no nation should have nuclear weapons – including the United
States.
The poll found 44 percent said they frequently or occasionally worry
about a terrorist attack using nuclear weapons, while 55 percent said
they rarely or never do.
WorldNetDaily columnist Jerome Corsi, author of the newly released
"Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American
Politicians," published by WND Books, says he is "pushing the alarm
button" as the nuclear threat posed to the United States and Israel is
"imminent."
Corsi believes that the greatest nuclear threat is posed by the
Iranian regime.
"Iran continues to display the characteristics of a rogue regime
actively pursuing nuclear weapons, willing to both defy and deceive
attempts at international control," he said. "Clearly stated, Iran has
been playing the world for a fool."
Big deal. We've got 'em, they've got 'em, sooner or later everyone will
have 'em.
That attitude will get us all killed.
I live three miles from Ground Zero for a first strike target.
I've grown up with the ever-present threat that tomorrow could be canceled
by the push of a button. No one uses them for real, the counterstroke from
the unreachable inventory would leave the agressor's country looking like
the back side of the Moon, and uninhabitable for decades at least. That's
called Deterrance,
That you think Terrorists care about retaliation shows that you
haven't a clue about them.
Lke I said above, your attitude will get us all killed.
the sure and certain knowledge of total anihilation as
a response to 'new-Q-lur' agression. The Navy's on the job, I sleep easy.
Charly
Islamic Terrorists don't give a *****, that you don't understand this
shows that you do not understand the situation.
Tony
Oh, I understand it well enough. I also understand that stopping someone
willing to exchange their life for mission success is next to impossible. I
just hope that they understand that we don't give a ***** either. Personally, I
would have turned the keys on them on 12 SEP 2001, but fortunately for them, I
don't get to make that call.
Fortunately for everyone.
Do you get a trouser-tent when you think about launching nukes? It seems
to figure in about ~80% of your posts, Mr Ripper.
-A
Nope. But weighed against all the other postage around here, it's a small reminder
to the global audience that we still have them, they're deployed, ready to fly, and
we've used them before. Back us far enough into a corner and we'll use them again.
For all their bluster, the other nuclear powers are still virgins. That's the Big
Stick that we carry. Using strategic weapons is not as 'unthinkable' as the Liberal
media would like us to believe.
C
I think you can relate to guy ;-)
-------------------------------
It is Time for Nuclear Weapons
By Mr. George M Weinert V
Wednesday, February 23, 2005
We can put a speedy end to the problem of Islamic Terrorism and also
easily demonstrate the effective use of nuclear power as a fast and
safe method to eliminate large and dangerous numbers of bothersome and
dangerous pests. We are also presented with a unique chance to save
money, help our economy and eliminate the enemies of Almighty God once
and for all.
This persistent and irksome ISLAMIST TERRORIST conduct leaves the US no
choice but to exterminate these bothersome insects totally and fumigate
the areas they have infected quite thoroughly. Pre-emptive nuclear
strikes aimed at Iran's nuclear facilities, Tehran and Damascus can
accomplish thee noble aims with a minimum of cost and risk to US
forces.
Now first let us examine a few figures:
Cost of one Smart (Minute Man) Missile $ 10,000,000.00
Cost of one Hydrogen Bomb $ 750,000.00
When we utilize the first option, we are gaining the benefits of:
* Great targeting precision (within one yard)
* Limited Destruction and loss of life
* Minimal collateral damage and resultant casualties
If we opt for the second option we are gaining the benefits of:
* Great targeting precision (within one yard)
* Great Destruction and loss of life (for those within the target area)
* Maximum Damage and total kill ratio (For those within the target
area)
Thus, when we examine these options it is easy to verify that tactical
nuclear weapons provide
Far More BANG FOR THE BUCK!
The USA has used nuclear weapons only once in warfare which led to the
quick and welcome end to WWII in the Pacific. At that time, since we
had just successfully concluded the Battle of Okinawa and we knew that
the Japanese fanatics (who were also fond of suicide bombers and also
never enjoyed the benefits of civilization) would wage a desperate
battle for the main island of Japan. Allied estimates of losses were
at ONE MILLION US soldiers for the invasion and TEN MILLION for the
Nips. When we realize that Truman's brave and historic decision to
bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved 15,000,000 lives we must applaud this
for his wisdom and courage.
This entire operation can cost less then TEN MILLION DOLLARS and result
in 20,000,000 DEAD ISLAMISTS killed instantly with ANOTHER 20,000,000
DEAD IN A FEW DAYS - bringing the SWIFT AND SURE JUSTICE OF GOD TO DAR
AL ISLAM.
THERE IS THEREFORE NO DEFENSBILE REASON FOR RISKING US LIVES SIMPLY TO
EXTERMINATE THESE FILTHY FOUL TERRORIST ROACHES. The ENORMOUS COST
SAVINGS ARE OF COURSE A HARD REALIY WE IN THE US MUST CONSIDER.
Therefore nuclear weapons should be used as needed to annihilate the
TERRORIST Demon.
NUKE 'EM NOW!!
We must also consider the potential involvement of Israeli forces in
this conflict. After three years of the Palestine Intifada, the
Israelis are indeed well justified in this and shall wreak nuclear
justice and vengeance on the ignorant and putrid Palestinians with the
Blessings of Abraham.
Now if Israel blasts the Iranian Demons and their reactors into hell
the truculent tribes of the Arab Street shall explode in a fit of
murderous rage directed at everything Western or related to the US that
these deranged anthropoids can find as the demonic demagogues that
masquerade as 'clerics' fill the mosques with ignominious ideologies.
Since the five mighty Arab armies that were allied against Israel in
1948-52 got their ignorant arses kicked and were humiliated by the tiny
and nascent nation of Israel the Arabs have had their bowels in a
perpetual uproar which can be easily seen in the recidivist
recrudescence of the Islamic Terrorist Crimes against Humanity. When
tiny Israel once again sent the anachronistic Arab armies scurrying
across the desert in 1967 and again in 1973 this only added to their
unshakable sense of shame and frustration. This event is in fact still
referred to in the "Arab World" as "al-Naksa" or "The Great
Humiliation". The "Arab Street" has in fact never dealt with the
reality of their expulsion from the lands from the Great Sea to the
Tigress-Euphrates Rivers by God as recorded in Genesis, Exodus and
again in Joshua. Action of this nature by Israel which shall lead yet
to another Arab Military humiliation can quickly lead to WWIII and is
dangerous in the ultimate:
IT IS BEST FOR THE USA BE THE POWER TO USE NUCLEAR WEAPONS GENEROUSLY.
Understandably there may be some initial reluctance but consider the
great benefits. While this attitude is indeed kind it is wrought with
peril for the entire human race. We must deal with a few realities at
this juncture though they are indeed difficult to accept and horrible:
* The enemy has demonstrated via their actions that they are no longer
fit to live within the confines of civilization opting instead for the
rule of murder, force and barbarism and attempting to force it upon the
rest of the world.
* The enemy has thus chosen to live by a set of rules that are savage
and thus contrary to the progress of the entire human race.
* The enemy constitutes a dangerous and malignant societal cancer that
must be surgically removed for the benefit and health of all.
* The Enemy is NOT HUMAN but are DEMONS FROM HELL that must be sent
back
Though nuclear weapons are and always have been our last defense their
use can prove quite beneficial in this case. The use of nuclear force
brought a speedy and welcome end to WWII and even though little was
known regarding the long term effects on the environment the Allied
forces were able to successfully occupy Japan and introduce this
ancient empire to civilization and democracy.
Thus if it indeed becomes needed, the use of tactical nuclear weapons
can indeed prove quite beneficial providing for:
* The Complete and Immediate defeat of the TERRORIST devils
* The Dire Warning to the other Arab and "rogue" states that they can
indeed be next
(this has already occurred with the sorry state of North Korea and
shall ultimately prove beneficial and potentially quite
profitable for all parties concerned)
* The sorely needed World Event that a nation of the People, by the
People and For the People shall remain as the Leader of All Nations and
will indeed share the benefits and blessings that we share with the
hordes of sad wretches in Asia, Africa and Indonesia.
* The New Pax Americana that we find ourselves leading can indeed be
explosively defined by this single small event and the costs shall
indeed be minimal.
* A Single brave and bold decision on the part of the USA, much like
that taken by President Truman in 1945 to take this needed step can
indeed save thousands of American and British lives with the smallest
expenditures.
Iran's reactors are the primary target, but as long as we're having so
much fun, NUKING TEHRAN and DAMASCUS should be accomplished
simultaneously - IT TIME TO BLAST THEM TO HADES!
The USA must honestly admit to itself and all that we shall sooner or
later be forced to KICK THE HELL out of one of these errant and
misbehaved Arabs and it is far better done sooner than later when it
may provide exceedingly difficult:
The USA must NOW FINISH THE JOB and enemy casualties should be of no
concern: (accidents do happen and since the Arabs fornicate like demons
they shall make up the shortfall quickly) since these monstrous
liaisons of Lucifer must be stopped it may prove necessary to wipe out
hundreds of millions of them for the good of all and we must remember -
THE EVIL TERRORISTS SHALL BE SENT BACK INTO HELL WHERE THEY CAME FROM!
THIS INDEED IS THE JUSTICE OF GOD.
Hence The use of Nuclear weapons in this conflict is not only possible,
but could prove highly beneficial to all concerned. (and provide for
some really great laughs as well)
Millions of Muslims wish to DIE FOR ALLAH - so why don't we HELP THEM
OUT?
KILL THEM ALL! (God Will sort them out)
The number of Islamist extremists in the world as estimated by moderate
Muslim leaders: about 12 million. Fundamentalist sympathizers: 120
million. Those numbers represent 1 percent and 10 percent of the
world's Muslim population of 1.2 billion. The CIA puts the extremists
much higher - 40 million. They all must be destroyed.
Let us Pray:
St. Michael, the Archangel, Defend us in battle. Be our defense
against the wickedness and snares of the Devil. May God rebuke him, we
humbly pray. And do Thou, O heavenly host, through the Power of God,
THRUST INTO HELL SATAN, and all the EVIL SPIRITS that prowl about the
world SEEKING THE RUIN OF SOULS AMEN.
Now it's fairly simple - and can be done in a few hours - so let's stop
playing games and:
NUKE 'EM NOW! 1
HALLELUJAH!
http://americanjihad.blogspot.com
Praise the Lord and God Bless America, Professor George M Weinert V
Georgemvw999@hotmail.com
http://groups.msn.com/americanjihad/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/group/americanjihad/
1 Once we have exterminated most of them, we can go in and get that oil
flowing and do something useful - and then employ TACTICAL NUKES in
Pakistan to get rid of Al-Qaeda and the remainder of the Taliban too -
and that's the ball game! Then Israel can just use some small
tactical nukes on Gaza and the West Bank and eradicate the smelly
Palestinians too! We must understand that we will have to exterminate
MILLIONS, and perhaps HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF THESE FILTHY ISLAMIC
MONSTERS AND DO SO WITH GOD ON OUR SIDE!!!
THIS IS OUR HOLY CHRISTIAN DUTY!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charly the Bastard" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
15 Apr 2005 07:00:58 AM |
|
|
MonsieurStat wrote:
Charly the ***** wrote:
Absolute Zero wrote:
Charly the ***** wrote:
itwill@happen.com wrote:
Charley the ***** wrote:
itwill@happen.com wrote:
Americans expect nuclear attack
Author says Iran poses imminent threat
Posted: March 31, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
While a new national poll finds 52 percent of Americans think a
nuclear attack is likely by 2010, the author of a new book on the
Iranian bomb says the threat posed by that regime is imminent.
The survey, conducted by AP-Ipsos, found two-thirds of Americans
believe no nation should have nuclear weapons – including the United
States.
The poll found 44 percent said they frequently or occasionally worry
about a terrorist attack using nuclear weapons, while 55 percent said
they rarely or never do.
WorldNetDaily columnist Jerome Corsi, author of the newly released
"Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American
Politicians," published by WND Books, says he is "pushing the alarm
button" as the nuclear threat posed to the United States and Israel is
"imminent."
Corsi believes that the greatest nuclear threat is posed by the
Iranian regime.
"Iran continues to display the characteristics of a rogue regime
actively pursuing nuclear weapons, willing to both defy and deceive
attempts at international control," he said. "Clearly stated, Iran has
been playing the world for a fool."
Big deal. We've got 'em, they've got 'em, sooner or later everyone will
have 'em.
That attitude will get us all killed.
I live three miles from Ground Zero for a first strike target.
I've grown up with the ever-present threat that tomorrow could be canceled
by the push of a button. No one uses them for real, the counterstroke from
the unreachable inventory would leave the agressor's country looking like
the back side of the Moon, and uninhabitable for decades at least. That's
called Deterrance,
That you think Terrorists care about retaliation shows that you
haven't a clue about them.
Lke I said above, your attitude will get us all killed.
the sure and certain knowledge of total anihilation as
a response to 'new-Q-lur' agression. The Navy's on the job, I sleep easy.
Charly
Islamic Terrorists don't give a *****, that you don't understand this
shows that you do not understand the situation.
Tony
Oh, I understand it well enough. I also understand that stopping someone
willing to exchange their life for mission success is next to impossible. I
just hope that they understand that we don't give a ***** either. Personally, I
would have turned the keys on them on 12 SEP 2001, but fortunately for them, I
don't get to make that call.
Fortunately for everyone.
Do you get a trouser-tent when you think about launching nukes? It seems
to figure in about ~80% of your posts, Mr Ripper.
-A
Nope. But weighed against all the other postage around here, it's a small reminder
to the global audience that we still have them, they're deployed, ready to fly, and
we've used them before. Back us far enough into a corner and we'll use them again.
For all their bluster, the other nuclear powers are still virgins. That's the Big
Stick that we carry. Using strategic weapons is not as 'unthinkable' as the Liberal
media would like us to believe.
C
I think you can relate to guy ;-)
-------------------------------
It is Time for Nuclear Weapons
By Mr. George M Weinert V
Wednesday, February 23, 2005
snippage
I must admit, this fellow can sling a phrase. I don't think we need to nuke them now, but
I think they need to be Sternly Warned that it's not out of the question if they don't
start cleaning their cultural house and right now. I think that nuking Mecca in response
to a WMD attack here in the US should be Policy, and widely publicied in the international
media. Mecca seems to be the only thing that ALL of them give a #$%^ about, maybe that
will get through and give them cause for a pause. We can always nuke them later, if it
comes to that.
Charly
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
15 Apr 2005 07:10:28 AM |
|
|
"Charly the *****" <nitecrawler7@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:425FACE6.4AC36100@worldnet.att.net...
MonsieurStat wrote:
Charly the ***** wrote:
Absolute Zero wrote:
Charly the ***** wrote:
itwill@happen.com wrote:
Charley the ***** wrote:
itwill@happen.com wrote:
Americans expect nuclear attack
Author says Iran poses imminent threat
Posted: March 31, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
While a new national poll finds 52 percent of Americans think a
nuclear attack is likely by 2010, the author of a new book on the
Iranian bomb says the threat posed by that regime is imminent.
The survey, conducted by AP-Ipsos, found two-thirds of Americans
believe no nation should have nuclear weapons - including the
United
States.
The poll found 44 percent said they frequently or occasionally
worry
about a terrorist attack using nuclear weapons, while 55 percent
said
they rarely or never do.
WorldNetDaily columnist Jerome Corsi, author of the newly released
"Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and
American
Politicians," published by WND Books, says he is "pushing the
alarm
button" as the nuclear threat posed to the United States and
Israel is
"imminent."
Corsi believes that the greatest nuclear threat is posed by the
Iranian regime.
"Iran continues to display the characteristics of a rogue regime
actively pursuing nuclear weapons, willing to both defy and
deceive
attempts at international control," he said. "Clearly stated, Iran
has
been playing the world for a fool."
Big deal. We've got 'em, they've got 'em, sooner or later everyone
will
have 'em.
That attitude will get us all killed.
I live three miles from Ground Zero for a first strike target.
I've grown up with the ever-present threat that tomorrow could be
canceled
by the push of a button. No one uses them for real, the
counterstroke from
the unreachable inventory would leave the agressor's country
looking like
the back side of the Moon, and uninhabitable for decades at least.
That's
called Deterrance,
That you think Terrorists care about retaliation shows that you
haven't a clue about them.
Lke I said above, your attitude will get us all killed.
the sure and certain knowledge of total anihilation as
a response to 'new-Q-lur' agression. The Navy's on the job, I sleep
easy.
Charly
Islamic Terrorists don't give a *****, that you don't understand this
shows that you do not understand the situation.
Tony
Oh, I understand it well enough. I also understand that stopping
someone
willing to exchange their life for mission success is next to
impossible. I
just hope that they understand that we don't give a ***** either.
Personally, I
would have turned the keys on them on 12 SEP 2001, but fortunately
for them, I
don't get to make that call.
Fortunately for everyone.
Do you get a trouser-tent when you think about launching nukes? It
seems
to figure in about ~80% of your posts, Mr Ripper.
-A
Nope. But weighed against all the other postage around here, it's a
small reminder
to the global audience that we still have them, they're deployed,
ready to fly, and
we've used them before. Back us far enough into a corner and we'll use
them again.
For all their bluster, the other nuclear powers are still virgins.
That's the Big
Stick that we carry. Using strategic weapons is not as 'unthinkable'
as the Liberal
media would like us to believe.
C
I think you can relate to guy ;-)
-------------------------------
It is Time for Nuclear Weapons
By Mr. George M Weinert V
Wednesday, February 23, 2005
snippage
I must admit, this fellow can sling a phrase. I don't think we need to
nuke them now, but
I think they need to be Sternly Warned that it's not out of the question
if they don't
start cleaning their cultural house and right now. I think that nuking
Mecca in response
to a WMD attack here in the US should be Policy
Then you are a foaming nutcase.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charly the Bastard" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
19 Apr 2005 07:16:25 AM |
|
|
tw wrote:
"Charly the *****" <nitecrawler7@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:425FACE6.4AC36100@worldnet.att.net...
MonsieurStat wrote:
Charly the ***** wrote:
Absolute Zero wrote:
Charly the ***** wrote:
itwill@happen.com wrote:
Charley the ***** wrote:
itwill@happen.com wrote:
Americans expect nuclear attack
Author says Iran poses imminent threat
Posted: March 31, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
While a new national poll finds 52 percent of Americans think a
nuclear attack is likely by 2010, the author of a new book on the
Iranian bomb says the threat posed by that regime is imminent.
The survey, conducted by AP-Ipsos, found two-thirds of Americans
believe no nation should have nuclear weapons - including the
United
States.
The poll found 44 percent said they frequently or occasionally
worry
about a terrorist attack using nuclear weapons, while 55 percent
said
they rarely or never do.
WorldNetDaily columnist Jerome Corsi, author of the newly released
"Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and
American
Politicians," published by WND Books, says he is "pushing the
alarm
button" as the nuclear threat posed to the United States and
Israel is
"imminent."
Corsi believes that the greatest nuclear threat is posed by the
Iranian regime.
"Iran continues to display the characteristics of a rogue regime
actively pursuing nuclear weapons, willing to both defy and
deceive
attempts at international control," he said. "Clearly stated, Iran
has
been playing the world for a fool."
Big deal. We've got 'em, they've got 'em, sooner or later everyone
will
have 'em.
That attitude will get us all killed.
I live three miles from Ground Zero for a first strike target.
I've grown up with the ever-present threat that tomorrow could be
canceled
by the push of a button. No one uses them for real, the
counterstroke from
the unreachable inventory would leave the agressor's country
looking like
the back side of the Moon, and uninhabitable for decades at least.
That's
called Deterrance,
That you think Terrorists care about retaliation shows that you
haven't a clue about them.
Lke I said above, your attitude will get us all killed.
the sure and certain knowledge of total anihilation as
a response to 'new-Q-lur' agression. The Navy's on the job, I sleep
easy.
Charly
Islamic Terrorists don't give a *****, that you don't understand this
shows that you do not understand the situation.
Tony
Oh, I understand it well enough. I also understand that stopping
someone
willing to exchange their life for mission success is next to
impossible. I
just hope that they understand that we don't give a ***** either.
Personally, I
would have turned the keys on them on 12 SEP 2001, but fortunately
for them, I
don't get to make that call.
Fortunately for everyone.
Do you get a trouser-tent when you think about launching nukes? It
seems
to figure in about ~80% of your posts, Mr Ripper.
-A
Nope. But weighed against all the other postage around here, it's a
small reminder
to the global audience that we still have them, they're deployed,
ready to fly, and
we've used them before. Back us far enough into a corner and we'll use
them again.
For all their bluster, the other nuclear powers are still virgins.
That's the Big
Stick that we carry. Using strategic weapons is not as 'unthinkable'
as the Liberal
media would like us to believe.
C
I think you can relate to guy ;-)
-------------------------------
It is Time for Nuclear Weapons
By Mr. George M Weinert V
Wednesday, February 23, 2005
snippage
I must admit, this fellow can sling a phrase. I don't think we need to
nuke them now, but
I think they need to be Sternly Warned that it's not out of the question
if they don't
start cleaning their cultural house and right now. I think that nuking
Mecca in response
to a WMD attack here in the US should be Policy
Then you are a foaming nutcase.
Not really. The whole point of deterrance is to convince the opponent that he
will be much better off not attacking. This very threat kept the Soviets at bay
for fifty years, and they had the numerical advantage for at least thirty of
those years. So why didn't the Soviets attack and wipe out the Evil Crapitalist
Running Dog Lackeys? Because they KNEW that it would be a Pyrric Victory, and
their precious Mother Russia would be a radioactive wasteland as well.
Deterrance will work on the Islam Inc. bunch as well, but you've got to threaten
what they consider 'too precious to lose, whatever the reason', and be willing
to actually follow through in case of attack. If you make this threat Policy, it
removes the decision from the personal whim of the Prez and the threat has real
teeth. Islam Inc. will come to realize that it doesn't matter who is in the WH,
the hammer will fall if they attack. This is the stuff that actually keeps the
peace, treaties are just ink on paper.
Charly
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
19 Apr 2005 07:52:28 AM |
|
|
"Charly the *****" <nitecrawler7@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:4264F680.23031552@worldnet.att.net...
tw wrote:
"Charly the *****" <nitecrawler7@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:425FACE6.4AC36100@worldnet.att.net...
MonsieurStat wrote:
Charly the ***** wrote:
Absolute Zero wrote:
Charly the ***** wrote:
itwill@happen.com wrote:
Charley the ***** wrote:
itwill@happen.com wrote:
Americans expect nuclear attack
Author says Iran poses imminent threat
Posted: March 31, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
While a new national poll finds 52 percent of Americans think
a
nuclear attack is likely by 2010, the author of a new book on
the
Iranian bomb says the threat posed by that regime is imminent.
The survey, conducted by AP-Ipsos, found two-thirds of
Americans
believe no nation should have nuclear weapons - including the
United
States.
The poll found 44 percent said they frequently or occasionally
worry
about a terrorist attack using nuclear weapons, while 55
percent
said
they rarely or never do.
WorldNetDaily columnist Jerome Corsi, author of the newly
released
"Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and
American
Politicians," published by WND Books, says he is "pushing the
alarm
button" as the nuclear threat posed to the United States and
Israel is
"imminent."
Corsi believes that the greatest nuclear threat is posed by
the
Iranian regime.
"Iran continues to display the characteristics of a rogue
regime
actively pursuing nuclear weapons, willing to both defy and
deceive
attempts at international control," he said. "Clearly stated,
Iran
has
been playing the world for a fool."
Big deal. We've got 'em, they've got 'em, sooner or later
everyone
will
have 'em.
That attitude will get us all killed.
I live three miles from Ground Zero for a first strike target.
I've grown up with the ever-present threat that tomorrow could
be
canceled
by the push of a button. No one uses them for real, the
counterstroke from
the unreachable inventory would leave the agressor's country
looking like
the back side of the Moon, and uninhabitable for decades at
least.
That's
called Deterrance,
That you think Terrorists care about retaliation shows that you
haven't a clue about them.
Lke I said above, your attitude will get us all killed.
the sure and certain knowledge of total anihilation as
a response to 'new-Q-lur' agression. The Navy's on the job, I
sleep
easy.
Charly
Islamic Terrorists don't give a *****, that you don't understand
this
shows that you do not understand the situation.
Tony
Oh, I understand it well enough. I also understand that stopping
someone
willing to exchange their life for mission success is next to
impossible. I
just hope that they understand that we don't give a ***** either.
Personally, I
would have turned the keys on them on 12 SEP 2001, but
fortunately
for them, I
don't get to make that call.
Fortunately for everyone.
Do you get a trouser-tent when you think about launching nukes? It
seems
to figure in about ~80% of your posts, Mr Ripper.
-A
Nope. But weighed against all the other postage around here, it's
a
small reminder
to the global audience that we still have them, they're deployed,
ready to fly, and
we've used them before. Back us far enough into a corner and we'll
use
them again.
For all their bluster, the other nuclear powers are still virgins.
That's the Big
Stick that we carry. Using strategic weapons is not as
'unthinkable'
as the Liberal
media would like us to believe.
C
I think you can relate to guy ;-)
-------------------------------
It is Time for Nuclear Weapons
By Mr. George M Weinert V
Wednesday, February 23, 2005
snippage
I must admit, this fellow can sling a phrase. I don't think we need to
nuke them now, but
I think they need to be Sternly Warned that it's not out of the
question
if they don't
start cleaning their cultural house and right now. I think that nuking
Mecca in response
to a WMD attack here in the US should be Policy
Then you are a foaming nutcase.
Not really.
Yes, really.
1) Islam is NOT anti-western in general. Nuking Mecca woudl change this. Do
you think th UK shoud lhave Nuked Boston and NY when IRA bombs funded by
American money were killing and maiming women and children in Britain?
The whole point of deterrance is to convince the opponent that he
will be much better off not attacking.
Bit irrelevant if the opponent is more than willing to die for his cause,
isn't it?
This very threat kept the Soviets at bay
for fifty years, and they had the numerical advantage for at least thirty
of
those years.
Not in nukes they didn't, chumpy.
So why didn't the Soviets attack and wipe out the Evil Crapitalist
Running Dog Lackeys?
Maybe because they never seriously intended to..
Because they KNEW that it would be a Pyrric Victory, and
their precious Mother Russia would be a radioactive wasteland as well.
Deterrance will work on the Islam Inc. bunch as well
Hardly. It's guerilla warfare - such an act would merely produce more
insurgents - and significantly mroe fired up ones.
, but you've got to threaten
what they consider 'too precious to lose, whatever the reason', and be
willing
to actually follow through in case of attack.
Great idea. Nuke Mecca, kill millions of innocents and incinerate the focus
of Islam. then watch every moderate Muslim all over the worl, including
inside the US, who doesn't reagard T.W.A.T is a war on Islam swfitly change
their opinion and enlist for Kalashnikov drill and pilot lessons.
Do you think the UK woudl have been justified in nuking the Vatican as well
as revenge for the IRA? Woudl it have helped?
If you make this threat Policy, it
removes the decision from the personal whim of the Prez and the threat has
real
teeth. Islam Inc. will come to realize that it doesn't matter who is in
the WH,
the hammer will fall if they attack. This is the stuff that actually
keeps the
peace, treaties are just ink on paper.
You really don't have a fucking clue do you? What was the N-numbe rof that
helicopter you claimed was maintained to a poor standard again, by the way?
Charly
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
07 Apr 2005 03:39:07 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:22:28 GMT, Charly the *****
<nitecrawler7@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
itwill@happen.com wrote:
Americans expect nuclear attack
Author says Iran poses imminent threat
Maybe that's what you Americunts need to get you off your high horse,
a nuke aimed directly at the White Shack.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charly the Bastard" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
13 Apr 2005 08:13:16 AM |
|
|
wrote:
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:22:28 GMT, Charly the *****
<nitecrawler7@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
itwill@happen.com wrote:
Americans expect nuclear attack
Author says Iran poses imminent threat
Maybe that's what you Americunts need to get you off your high horse,
a nuke aimed directly at the White Shack.
That particular piece of Real Estate has been targetted since the
Russians set off their first one back in the late forties. It's still
targetted. We're used to it. Everything is backed up, popping the WH
would not destroy the government. The Chain of Command is extensive, and
already worked out, and decentralized. There will always be someone to
'turn the keys'.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
31 Mar 2005 04:35:39 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Americans expect nuclear attack
Author says Iran poses imminent threat
Posted: March 31, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
While a new national poll finds 52 percent of Americans think a
nuclear attack is likely by 2010, the author of a new book on the
Iranian bomb says the threat posed by that regime is imminent.
The survey, conducted by AP-Ipsos, found two-thirds of Americans
believe no nation should have nuclear weapons – including the United
States.
The poll found 44 percent said they frequently or occasionally worry
about a terrorist attack using nuclear weapons, while 55 percent said
they rarely or never do.
I wonder if these split pretty evenly between Bushies and non-Bushies.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans expect nuclear attack |
04 Apr 2005 05:30:52 PM |
|
|
A few quotes from your demented icon.
CORSI: =93So this is what the last days of the Catholic Church are going
to look like. Buggering boys undermines the moral base and the laywers
rip the gold off the Vatican altars. We may get one more Pope, when
this senile one dies, but that's probably about it. (12/16/2002) =93
=80 Corsi on Islam: "a worthless, dangerous Satanic religion"
=80 Corsi on Catholicism: "Boy buggering in both Islam and Catholicism
is okay with the Pope as long as it isn't reported by the liberal
press"
=80 Corsi on Muslims: "RAGHEADS are Boy-Bumpers as clearly as they are
Women-Haters -- it all goes together"
=80 Corsi on "John F*ing Commie Kerry": "After he married TerRAHsa,
didn't John Kerry begin practicing Judiasm? He also has paternal
grandparents that were Jewish. What religion is John Kerry?"
=80 Corsi on Senator "FAT HOG" Clinton: "Anybody ask why HELLary
couldn't keep BJ Bill satisfied? Not lesbo or anything, is she?"
CORSI: Maybe while he's there he can tell the UN what he's going to do
about the sexual crimes committed by "priests" in his "Church" during
his tenure. Or, maybe that's the connection -- boy buggering in both
Islam and Catholicism is okay with the Pope as long as it isn't
reported by the liberal press. (03/03/2003)
CORSI: So this is what the last days of the Catholic Church are going
to look like. Buggering boys undermines the moral base and the laywers
rip the gold off the Vatican altars. We may get one more Pope, when
this senile one dies, but that's probably about it. (12/16/2002)
On Islam and Arabs
CORSI: Let's see exactly why it isn't the case that Islam is a
worthless, dangerous Satanic religion? Where's the proof to the
contrary? (04/24/2004)
CORSI: Islam is like a virus -- it affects the mind -- maybe even
better as an analogy -- it is a cancer that destroys the body it
infects... No doctor would hesitate to eliminate cancer cells from the
body. (11/26/02)
CORSI: Islam is a peaceful religion as long as the women are beaten,
the boys buggered, and the infidels killed. (11/22/2002)
CORSI: How's this as an analogy -- the Koran is simply the "software"
for producing deviant cancer cell political behavior and violence in
human beings. (02/15/2002)
CORSI: Think the liberal press will ever let out that these 2 were
lovers -- typical Islamic boy-buggering -- older man, younger man --
black Muslims? I doubt it. Not a pretty picture, but one certain to be
hidden by PC media. (11/08/2002)
CORSI: Isn't the Democratic Party the official SODOMIZER PROTECTION
ASSOCIATION of AMERICA -- oh, I forgot, it was just an accident that
Clintoon's first act in office was to promote "gays in the military."
RAGHEADS are Boy-Bumpers as clearly as they are Women-Haters -- it all
goes together. (11/18/2001)
On Senator John Kerry
CORSI: First let's undermine the US in Vietnam. Then we can go for gay
marriage. When you get to be Pres. JFK-lite, there will be no end to
how much of America we can destroy. (05/17/2004)
CORSI: Just don't let anybody put a tablet with the Ten Commandments in
front of the school where that girl wants to wear a Muslim scarf -- OH,
No --- then the RATS would complain. Anti-Christian, Anti-American --
just like their Presidential Candidate -- Jean Francois Kerrie.
(03/31/2004)
CORSI: After he married TerRAHsa, didn't John Kerry begin practicing
Judiasm? He also has paternal gradparents that were Jewish. What
religion is John Kerry? (03/04/2004)
CORSI: Kerry has a long history of Communist supporters. (03/12/2004)
CORSI: Kerry offers a clear choice. Anti-American hatred. (02/08/2004)
CORSI: John F*ing Commie Kerry and Commie Ted [Kennedy] discuss their
plan to hand America over to our nation's enemies. (02/04/2004)
On former President Bill Clinton
CORSI: When is this guy going to admit he's simply an anti-American
communist? Won't he and his leftist wife simply go away???? Enough
already. (02/24/2002)
CORSI: Hey, Bill, didn't you steal enough when you had the chance?
(02/15/2002)
CORSI: Clinton doesn't get it. Afganistan, and other Moslim countries,
are not poor because they lack money. The culture itself is
anti-modern. But then, maybe Slick did get it and he just wants to
create another bork barrel from which he and his wife can draw slop.
(02/15/2002)
CORSI: Clinton was more interested in gays in the military than going
after OBL. Clinton had Janet Rhino pushing the FBI to deport a child to
Castro's nondemocratic Cuba, not searching out OBL sleepers in the USA.
Clinton was too busy getting BJs in the Oval Office to do more than Wag
the Dog after the Cole was hit. (05/16/2002)
On Senator Hillary Clinton
CORSI: HELL-ary loves the Arabs so much (kiss, kiss Mrs. Arab*RAT) --
wonder how she would look in a Burkha? (05/21/2002)
CORSI: Mullah Ali'Gore-ah is very proud of his new Bin Laden beard and
he hopes others in the Democratic Party will follow his lead. Hell-ary
is disappointed she cannot grow a beard, but her press secretary
reminds us she can still enroll in flight school. (01/07/02)
CORSI: Let the FAT HOG run!!! [regarding a possible presidential bid]
(08/30/2003)
CORSI: Hellary should resign and go away. What ever happened to the
people she ran over with her car at Westchester Airport? Can't anybody
sue this b*tch? (11/17/2002)
CORSI: Anybody ask why HELLary couldn't keep BJ Bill satisfied? Not
lesbo or anything, is she? (06/08/2003)
On Chelsea Clinton
CORSI: According to Talk Magazine, Chubby Chelsea had a very great
adventure on 9/11 in NYC and Hell-ary had the details wrong -- oh, it
was terrible. (12/07/2001)
CORSI: Did the Journalist see Chubbie Chelsea among the wives. Little
Katie Communist [Katie Couric] on the NBC Today show interviewed
Hillary this morning and mom is worried sick about Chelsea. She was
last seen in Kandahar at a Starbucks. But now, as Little Katie
Communist sighed, "Who Knows?" Even British disinformation planted
reports such as this grocery crap will be useful. Anyone with
information about Chubbie Chelsea's whereabouts should post it now. Mom
wants to know her daughter is out of harms way. Mom also wants to be at
the center of the story. (11/29/2001)
CORSI: But the real question is: WHERE IS CHUBBIE CHELSEA? Is she in
Kabul in danger, looking for a Starbucks? Waldo wants to know. Please,
Little Katie Communist, HELP US FIND CHELSEA. THE SITUATION MAY BE
URGENT. (11/29/2001)
CORSI: HILLARY SAYS CHELSEA IS MISSING AND JANET RHINO DOESN'T KNOW
WHERE SHE IS? (11/28/2001)
On former Vice President Al Gore
CORSI: Gore isn't available for television. He is growing his
regulation length Bin Laden beard. Mullah Ali'Gore-ah, as he now wishes
to be called, is focused on his new career as a pilot. "Want to fly
like bird," he says after his stint as a professor at Columbia. "No
need to learn take-off or landing, just soar like bird and look at
buildings." As to Florida, Mulllah Gore-ah says, "No big buildings,"
dismissing the importance of the state to his future plans."
(12/15/2001)
On the Media
CORSI: Time to FREEP Chris Matthews of MSNBC. MSNBC is beginning to
stand for "More Sh*t, Nothing But Communism." (05/16/2002)
CORSI: I didn't realize Little Katie Communist of the NBC Today Show
knew how to hack a website. Finally something impressive from the
little wimp. [responding to news that USA Today's website had been
hacked and that the hackers were mocking President George W. Bush's
Christianity] (07/12/2002)
CORSI: COMMUNISM -- it's simple NBC =3D NOTHING BUT COMMUNISM.
(04/19/2004)
CORSI: Susan Estrogen -- even the voice grates. But then with
supporters like her and Ted Kennedy, who needs enemies. Let Susan BLAH
BLAH screatch -- only Chrissy Matthews whines better. (04/13/2004)
Assorted
CORSI: Perfect Liberal -- lesbian, self-absorbed, hates America,
anxious to impose her values on everybody else. [on Martina
Navratilova] (06/26/2002)
CORSI: And now we get Pooh-LEFTY pushed on us by the RATS as Minority
Leader in the House -- here come the SanFrancisco liberals -- hope the
RATS go back to focusing the debate on gay marriages and other
pro-choice topics close to Pelosi's heart. (11/18/2002)
CORSI: Too bad the plane didn't crash into the TV set of the NBC show
"THE LEFT WING" -- especially when Martin Sheen was "acting."
(06/07/2003)
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
