This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0085_01C59531.1541D820
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
July 31, 2005
Bush to defy Senate and send his man to the UN
Sarah Baxter, Washington
FRUSTRATED by five months of wrangling and recriminations,
President George W Bush is expected to appoint John Bolton as ambassador
to the United Nations this week in defiance of Democrat senators and
critics in his own party.
The appointment of the plain-speaking diplomat, who once said
the United Nations could lose 10 floors without anybody noticing, is
likely to be announced before Bush leaves on Tuesday for his ranch in
Crawford, Texas.
Bush intends to exercise rarely used constitutional powers to
confirm his choice of ambassador while the Senate is on its August break
after Bolton failed to win the approval of enough senators for a
straightforward vote. The "recess appointment" would allow Bolton to serve
until January 2007 when the current session of Congress ends.
Scott McClellan, the White House press secretary, said: "It's
a critical time to be moving forward on this. The United Nations will be
having their general assembly meeting in September and it's important that
we get our permanent representative in place."
Bolton's staunch defence of American interests has won him
friends among neoconservatives, who consider it a badge of honour that he
has irritated countries in the so-called "axis of evil". Iran has called
Bolton "rude and undiplomatic"; a North Korean spokesman described him as
"human scum" and a "bloodsucker" after he branded Kim Jong-il a tyrant.
But other Republicans wonder whether it is wise to send as
ambassador to the UN a man who said in 1994: "There is no such thing as
the United Nations. There is an international community that occasionally
can be led by the only real power left in the world and that is the United
States."
Trent Lott, a senior Republican senator, said a recess
appointment would represent a "thumbing of the nose" at the Senate, which
would weaken Bolton at the UN.
"Everybody up there will know, in a tough job, that he was not
confirmed," Lott said. "It's a bad choice and I would recommend against
it. But I think they're going to do it and they'll have to live with the
consequences."
Republican disquiet deepened when Colin Powell, the former
secretary of state, let it be known that he did not approve of Bolton's
style of diplomacy.
During confirmation hearings Bolton, a former undersecretary
for arms control, was accused of twisting intelligence and bullying staff
who disagreed with him.
However, he is considered a favourite of ***** Cheney, the
vice-president, because of his conservatism and hawkish views on foreign
policy.
Any doubts that Condoleezza Rice, the secretary of state, may
have had about Bolton were publicly shelved last week, when she said
America would not be without leadership at the UN at a crucial time for
the embattled organisation.
"John is a tough diplomat," she said. "He has been critical at
times of some of the operations of the UN. But frankly, there are reasons
to be critical of some of the operations at the United Nations."
This week promises fresh revelations about the discredited
Iraq oil-for-food programme, which has bedevilled the UN and its
secretary- general, Kofi Annan.
An independent inquiry into the corruption scandal is expected
to release an interim report on Friday.
One of the most persistent critics of the UN, Senator Norm
Coleman, who chairs a congressional inquiry into the oil-for-food
programme, said last week that the controversy over Bolton's likely
appointment would soon become irrelevant.
The bottom line, he said, was that Bolton had the confidence
of the president. "He will speak for the president of the United States.
He will speak for America."
July 31, 2005
Bush to defy Senate and send his man to the UN
Sarah Baxter, Washington
FRUSTRATED by five months of wrangling and
recriminations, President George W Bush is expected to appoint John Bolton
as ambassador to the United Nations this week in defiance of Democrat
senators and critics in his own party.
The appointment of the plain-speaking diplomat, who once
said the United Nations could lose 10 floors without anybody noticing, is
likely to be announced before Bush leaves on Tuesday for his ranch in
Crawford, Texas.
Bush intends to exercise rarely used constitutional
powers to confirm his choice of ambassador while the Senate is on its
August break after Bolton failed to win the approval of enough senators
for a straightforward vote. The "recess appointment" would allow Bolton to
serve until January 2007 when the current session of Congress ends.
Scott McClellan, the White House press secretary, said:
"It's a critical time to be moving forward on this. The United Nations
will be having their general assembly meeting in September and it's
important that we get our permanent representative in place."
Bolton's staunch defence of American interests has won
him friends among neoconservatives, who consider it a badge of honour that
he has irritated countries in the so-called "axis of evil". Iran has
called Bolton "rude and undiplomatic"; a North Korean spokesman described
him as "human scum" and a "bloodsucker" after he branded Kim Jong-il a
tyrant.
But other Republicans wonder whether it is wise to send
as ambassador to the UN a man who said in 1994: "There is no such thing as
the United Nations. There is an international community that occasionally
can be led by the only real power left in the world and that is the United
States."
Trent Lott, a senior Republican senator, said a recess
appointment would represent a "thumbing of the nose" at the Senate, which
would weaken Bolton at the UN.
"Everybody up there will know, in a tough job, that he
was not confirmed," Lott said. "It's a bad choice and I would recommend
against it. But I think they're going to do it and they'll have to live
with the consequences."
Republican disquiet deepened when Colin Powell, the
former secretary of state, let it be known that he did not approve of
Bolton's style of diplomacy.
During confirmation hearings Bolton, a former
undersecretary for arms control, was accused of twisting intelligence and
bullying staff who disagreed with him.
However, he is considered a favourite of ***** Cheney,
the vice-president, because of his conservatism and hawkish views on
foreign policy.
Any doubts that Condoleezza Rice, the secretary of
state, may have had about Bolton were publicly shelved last week, when she
said America would not be without leadership at the UN at a crucial time
for the embattled organisation.
"John is a tough diplomat," she said. "He has been
critical at times of some of the operations of the UN. But frankly, there
are reasons to be critical of some of the operations at the United
Nations."
This week promises fresh revelations about the
discredited Iraq oil-for-food programme, which has bedevilled the UN and
its secretary- general, Kofi Annan.
An independent inquiry into the corruption scandal is
expected to release an interim report on Friday.
One of the most persistent critics of the UN, Senator
Norm Coleman, who chairs a congressional inquiry into the oil-for-food
programme, said last week that the controversy over Bolton's likely
appointment would soon become irrelevant.
The bottom line, he said, was that Bolton had the
confidence of the president. "He will speak for the president of the
United States. He will speak for America."
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0%2C%2C2089-1715045%2C00.html
------=_NextPart_000_0085_01C59531.1541D820
Content-Type: image/gif;
name="trans.gif"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Location: http://images.thetimes.co.uk/images/trans.gif
R0lGODlhAQABAJECAAAAMwAAAP///wAAACH5BAEAAAIALAAAAAABAAEAQAICVAEAOw==
------=_NextPart_000_0085_01C59531.1541D820--
.
|
|
| User: "dreamwalker" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush To Defy Senate and Send His Man To The UN :-O |
02 Aug 2005 08:43:40 PM |
|
|
"Doc" <bushelsofbushrot@HellsHereNow.com> wrote in message news:dch82b02npr@enews2.newsguy.com...
July 31, 2005
Bush to defy Senate and send his man to the UN
Sarah Baxter, Washington
FRUSTRATED by five months of wrangling and recriminations,
President George W Bush is expected to appoint John Bolton as ambassador
to the United Nations this week in defiance of Democrat senators and
critics in his own party.
The appointment of the plain-speaking diplomat, who once said
the United Nations could lose 10 floors without anybody noticing, is
likely to be announced before Bush leaves on Tuesday for his ranch in
Crawford, Texas.
Bush intends to exercise rarely used constitutional powers to
confirm his choice of ambassador while the Senate is on its August break
after Bolton failed to win the approval of enough senators for a
straightforward vote. The "recess appointment" would allow Bolton to serve
until January 2007 when the current session of Congress ends.
Scott McClellan, the White House press secretary, said: "It's
a critical time to be moving forward on this. The United Nations will be
having their general assembly meeting in September and it's important that
we get our permanent representative in place."
Bolton's staunch defence of American interests has won him
friends among neoconservatives, who consider it a badge of honour that he
has irritated countries in the so-called "axis of evil". Iran has called
Bolton "rude and undiplomatic"; a North Korean spokesman described him as
"human scum" and a "bloodsucker" after he branded Kim Jong-il a tyrant.
But other Republicans wonder whether it is wise to send as
ambassador to the UN a man who said in 1994: "There is no such thing as
the United Nations. There is an international community that occasionally
can be led by the only real power left in the world and that is the United
States."
Trent Lott, a senior Republican senator, said a recess
appointment would represent a "thumbing of the nose" at the Senate, which
would weaken Bolton at the UN.
"Everybody up there will know, in a tough job, that he was not
confirmed," Lott said. "It's a bad choice and I would recommend against
it. But I think they're going to do it and they'll have to live with the
consequences."
Republican disquiet deepened when Colin Powell, the former
secretary of state, let it be known that he did not approve of Bolton's
style of diplomacy.
During confirmation hearings Bolton, a former undersecretary
for arms control, was accused of twisting intelligence and bullying staff
who disagreed with him.
However, he is considered a favourite of ***** Cheney, the
vice-president, because of his conservatism and hawkish views on foreign
policy.
Any doubts that Condoleezza Rice, the secretary of state, may
have had about Bolton were publicly shelved last week, when she said
America would not be without leadership at the UN at a crucial time for
the embattled organisation.
"John is a tough diplomat," she said. "He has been critical at
times of some of the operations of the UN. But frankly, there are reasons
to be critical of some of the operations at the United Nations."
This week promises fresh revelations about the discredited
Iraq oil-for-food programme, which has bedevilled the UN and its
secretary- general, Kofi Annan.
An independent inquiry into the corruption scandal is expected
to release an interim report on Friday.
One of the most persistent critics of the UN, Senator Norm
Coleman, who chairs a congressional inquiry into the oil-for-food
programme, said last week that the controversy over Bolton's likely
appointment would soon become irrelevant.
The bottom line, he said, was that Bolton had the confidence
of the president. "He will speak for the president of the United States.
He will speak for America."
July 31, 2005
Bush to defy Senate and send his man to the UN
Sarah Baxter, Washington
FRUSTRATED by five months of wrangling and
recriminations, President George W Bush is expected to appoint John Bolton
as ambassador to the United Nations this week in defiance of Democrat
senators and critics in his own party.
The appointment of the plain-speaking diplomat, who once
said the United Nations could lose 10 floors without anybody noticing, is
likely to be announced before Bush leaves on Tuesday for his ranch in
Crawford, Texas.
Bush intends to exercise rarely used constitutional
powers to confirm his choice of ambassador while the Senate is on its
August break after Bolton failed to win the approval of enough senators
for a straightforward vote. The "recess appointment" would allow Bolton to
serve until January 2007 when the current session of Congress ends.
Scott McClellan, the White House press secretary, said:
"It's a critical time to be moving forward on this. The United Nations
will be having their general assembly meeting in September and it's
important that we get our permanent representative in place."
Bolton's staunch defence of American interests has won
him friends among neoconservatives, who consider it a badge of honour that
he has irritated countries in the so-called "axis of evil". Iran has
called Bolton "rude and undiplomatic"; a North Korean spokesman described
him as "human scum" and a "bloodsucker" after he branded Kim Jong-il a
tyrant.
But other Republicans wonder whether it is wise to send
as ambassador to the UN a man who said in 1994: "There is no such thing as
the United Nations. There is an international community that occasionally
can be led by the only real power left in the world and that is the United
States."
Trent Lott, a senior Republican senator, said a recess
appointment would represent a "thumbing of the nose" at the Senate, which
would weaken Bolton at the UN.
"Everybody up there will know, in a tough job, that he
was not confirmed," Lott said. "It's a bad choice and I would recommend
against it. But I think they're going to do it and they'll have to live
with the consequences."
Republican disquiet deepened when Colin Powell, the
former secretary of state, let it be known that he did not approve of
Bolton's style of diplomacy.
During confirmation hearings Bolton, a former
undersecretary for arms control, was accused of twisting intelligence and
bullying staff who disagreed with him.
However, he is considered a favourite of ***** Cheney,
the vice-president, because of his conservatism and hawkish views on
foreign policy.
Any doubts that Condoleezza Rice, the secretary of
state, may have had about Bolton were publicly shelved last week, when she
said America would not be without leadership at the UN at a crucial time
for the embattled organisation.
"John is a tough diplomat," she said. "He has been
critical at times of some of the operations of the UN. But frankly, there
are reasons to be critical of some of the operations at the United
Nations."
This week promises fresh revelations about the
discredited Iraq oil-for-food programme, which has bedevilled the UN and
its secretary- general, Kofi Annan.
An independent inquiry into the corruption scandal is
expected to release an interim report on Friday.
One of the most persistent critics of the UN, Senator
Norm Coleman, who chairs a congressional inquiry into the oil-for-food
programme, said last week that the controversy over Bolton's likely
appointment would soon become irrelevant.
The bottom line, he said, was that Bolton had the
confidence of the president. "He will speak for the president of the
United States. He will speak for America."
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0%2C%2C2089-1715045%2C00.html
He's a good man. Tough. The dems had their chance for a straight up and down vote but they refused.
They knew he'd be voted in. Now they whine. Bush did the right thing. I'm proud of my man in office.
Dems can suck a turd.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush To Defy Senate and Send His Man To The UN :-O |
31 Jul 2005 08:30:27 AM |
|
|
Doc wrote:
July 31, 2005
Bush to defy Senate and send his man to the UN
Sarah Baxter, Washington
Is anyone in the least surprised? I doubt it.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush To Defy Senate and Send His Man To The UN :-O |
01 Aug 2005 10:46:47 PM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:Tn4He.724$0m1.76@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
Doc wrote:
July 31, 2005
Bush to defy Senate and send his man to the UN
Sarah Baxter, Washington
Is anyone in the least surprised? I doubt it.
Woods
Not surprised, just dismayed at the course of events under this
administration's watch.
Bolton is such a friggin' weirdo--jeez, he even looks like a serial
killer.
Doc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush To Defy Senate and Send His Man To The UN :-O |
02 Aug 2005 05:05:27 PM |
|
|
Doc wrote:
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:Tn4He.724$0m1.76@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
Doc wrote:
July 31, 2005
Bush to defy Senate and send his man to the UN
Sarah Baxter, Washington
Is anyone in the least surprised? I doubt it.
Woods
Not surprised, just dismayed at the course of events under this
administration's watch.
Bolton is such a friggin' weirdo--jeez, he even looks like a serial killer.
Doc
You know Bush, he's not satisfide with flouting UN procedure, he'll want
to make sure everyone knows what a tough guy he is by appointing an
ambassador who is known to be critical of the UN itself.
Bush is a divider, not a uniter.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "dreamwalker" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush To Defy Senate and Send His Man To The UN :-O |
02 Aug 2005 08:45:39 PM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message news:H6SHe.312$N93.66@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
Doc wrote:
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:Tn4He.724$0m1.76@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
Doc wrote:
July 31, 2005
Bush to defy Senate and send his man to the UN
Sarah Baxter, Washington
Is anyone in the least surprised? I doubt it.
Woods
Not surprised, just dismayed at the course of events under this administration's watch.
Bolton is such a friggin' weirdo--jeez, he even looks like a serial killer.
Doc
You know Bush, he's not satisfide with flouting UN procedure, he'll want to make sure everyone
knows what a tough guy he is by appointing an ambassador who is known to be critical of the UN
itself.
Bush is a divider, not a uniter.
Woods
Someone has to be critical of the UN. They're not.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush To Defy Senate and Send His Man To The UN :-O |
03 Aug 2005 04:19:02 PM |
|
|
dreamwalker wrote:
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message news:H6SHe.312$N93.66@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
Doc wrote:
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:Tn4He.724$0m1.76@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
Doc wrote:
July 31, 2005
Bush to defy Senate and send his man to the UN
Sarah Baxter, Washington
Is anyone in the least surprised? I doubt it.
Woods
Not surprised, just dismayed at the course of events under this administration's watch.
Bolton is such a friggin' weirdo--jeez, he even looks like a serial killer.
Doc
You know Bush, he's not satisfide with flouting UN procedure, he'll want to make sure everyone
knows what a tough guy he is by appointing an ambassador who is known to be critical of the UN
itself.
Bush is a divider, not a uniter.
Woods
Someone has to be critical of the UN. They're not.
Constructive criticism is ceertainly to be encouraged. However, whining
and stomping off in a snit because you didn't get your way, like the
Bush administration, doesn't fall into that category.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "FourCell" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush To Defy Senate and Send His Man To The UN :-O |
02 Aug 2005 01:21:43 PM |
|
|
Doc wrote:
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:Tn4He.724$0m1.76@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
Doc wrote:
July 31, 2005
Bush to defy Senate and send his man to the UN
Sarah Baxter, Washington
Is anyone in the least surprised? I doubt it.
Woods
Not surprised, just dismayed at the course of events under this
administration's watch.
Bolton is such a friggin' weirdo--jeez, he even looks like a serial
killer.
Doc
Reich Ambassador Bolton is definitely a piece of work. I wouldn't
be surprised if he's part of the Satanic cult pedophile ring
operating in in D.C., as well.
As far as Bolton's 'professional' background, check out
Michael Ledeen (who is quite insane). Ledeen is Bolton's
"brain". man. Both have a long history of drug running and
doing arms deals to both sides of the Iran - Iraq War.
Excellent qualifations for the US Ambassador to the U.N.
America deserves what it get's, and the best is yet to come.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush To Defy Senate and Send His Man To The UN :-O |
30 Jul 2005 08:34:30 PM |
|
|
Doc wrote:
July 31, 2005
Bush to defy Senate and send his man to the UN
Sarah Baxter, Washington
Bolton's an *****. Bush is an *****.
Bush wins. America loses. That's what it's all about.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush To Defy Senate and Send His Man To The UN :-O |
30 Jul 2005 09:48:46 PM |
|
|
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvinparanoidandroid@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:6WVGe.8520$q23.1404379@news20.bellglobal.com...
Doc wrote:
July 31, 2005
Bush to defy Senate and send his man to the UN
Sarah Baxter, Washington
Bolton's an *****. Bush is an *****.
Bush wins. America loses. That's what it's all about.
Agreed. And, it's also about a form of fascistic thinking. If this pans
out, it will undoubtedly cause more international diplomacy tensions.
Something we just simply don't need at this critical juncture in history
is more bullying, self-righteous intransigence and nationalistic arrogance
on the part of the USA.
Where are the really intelligent, wise, understanding leaders when
humanity needs them the most?
Doc
.
|
|
|
| User: "dreamwalker" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush To Defy Senate and Send His Man To The UN :-O |
02 Aug 2005 08:44:10 PM |
|
|
"Doc" <bushelsofbushrot@HellsHereNow.com> wrote in message news:dche6h02v1c@enews2.newsguy.com...
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvinparanoidandroid@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6WVGe.8520$q23.1404379@news20.bellglobal.com...
Doc wrote:
July 31, 2005
Bush to defy Senate and send his man to the UN
Sarah Baxter, Washington
Bolton's an *****. Bush is an *****.
Bush wins. America loses. That's what it's all about.
Agreed. And, it's also about a form of fascistic thinking. If this pans out, it will undoubtedly
cause more international diplomacy tensions. Something we just simply don't need at this critical
juncture in history is more bullying, self-righteous intransigence and nationalistic arrogance on
the part of the USA.
Where are the really intelligent, wise, understanding leaders when humanity needs them the most?
Doc
He's the right man.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush To Defy Senate and Send His Man To The UN :-O |
30 Jul 2005 10:19:42 PM |
|
|
Doc wrote:
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvinparanoidandroid@hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:6WVGe.8520$q23.1404379@news20.bellglobal.com...
Doc wrote:
July 31, 2005
Bush to defy Senate and send his man to the UN
Sarah Baxter, Washington
Bolton's an *****. Bush is an *****.
Bush wins. America loses. That's what it's all about.
Agreed. And, it's also about a form of fascistic thinking. If this pans
out, it will undoubtedly cause more international diplomacy tensions.
That's what the Chimp wants. The more "Enemies Of 'merica", the better
it seems. Remember 'Freedom Fries'... LOL ... ??
Something we just simply don't need at this critical juncture in history
is more bullying, self-righteous intransigence and nationalistic
arrogance on the part of the USA.
Well ... it seems that's exactly what Bush thinks is "Right For
'merica". It characterizes this Admin to a tee. In fact, Bush appointing
Bolton during a recess is perfect!
Where are the really intelligent, wise, understanding leaders when
humanity needs them the most?
They're the "Enemies Of 'merica".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush To Defy Senate and Send His Man To The UN :-O |
31 Jul 2005 12:05:46 AM |
|
|
Marvin The Paranoid Android wrote:
Doc wrote:
Where are the really intelligent, wise, understanding leaders when
humanity needs them the most?
They're the "Enemies Of 'merica".
That 'merica thing reminds me of Lyndon Johnson: "My fellow 'mericans
.... I shall not seek, nor will I accept, the nomination of my party for
another term as your President. And if elected, I will not serve."
Beyond that, the world actually has had some really intelligent, wise,
and understanding leaders come along just when humanity needed them
most -- FDR & Churchill; Thatcher & Reagan; and my current favorite,
Tony Blair.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|