A world on the Verge of Destruction. Fundies love it.
eric.
P.S. If Kerry can clean this up, he's Abraham Lincoln.
.
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's Legacy |
31 Oct 2004 11:49:27 PM |
|
|
"eric davis" <ericdavis500@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
A world on the Verge of Destruction. Fundies love it.
eric.
P.S. If Kerry can clean this up, he's Abraham Lincoln.
Abraham Lincoln started the Republican Party. John Kerry is
all Democrat.
.
|
|
|
| User: "eric davis" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's Legacy |
01 Nov 2004 08:21:51 AM |
|
|
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9593E82E95DA8rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.148.227.77...
"eric davis" <ericdavis500@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
A world on the Verge of Destruction. Fundies love it.
eric.
P.S. If Kerry can clean this up, he's Abraham Lincoln.
Abraham Lincoln started the Republican Party. John Kerry is
all Democrat.
And George Bush ended the Republican Party.
eric.
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's Legacy |
01 Nov 2004 06:50:47 AM |
|
|
"eric davis" <ericdavis500@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9593E82E95DA8rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.148.227.77...
"eric davis" <ericdavis500@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
A world on the Verge of Destruction. Fundies love it.
eric.
P.S. If Kerry can clean this up, he's Abraham Lincoln.
Abraham Lincoln started the Republican Party. John Kerry is
all Democrat.
And George Bush ended the Republican Party.
Very possibly. The neocons have 'slightly' different methods
than classical Republicans.
eric.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's Legacy |
01 Nov 2004 08:31:27 PM |
|
|
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message news:<Xns95943B7971EC6rrfkwrantispamattbic@63.240.76.16>...
"eric davis" <ericdavis500@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
Very possibly. The neocons have 'slightly' different methods
than classical Republicans.
Lincoln was against slavery and he was a repub. I guess that means
that all liberals of today ( not classical I guess is the term now)
are fascist pigs, eh? ;) BTW they are against Jews something that
Hitler is known to be ;)
Screws up your whole system of reality, eh?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's Legacy |
01 Nov 2004 11:47:02 PM |
|
|
are fascist pigs, eh? ;) BTW they are against Jews something that
Hitler is known to be ;)
Was it really just Hitler that caused the expulsion of Jews more than
1000 times throughout recorded history, or is there another side to
the story?
The expulsions of jews from Host Nations:
A.D. 250, Carthage
415 Alexandria
554 Diocese of Clement (France)
561 Diocese of Uzzes (France)
612 Visigoth Spain
642 Visigoth Empire
855 Italy
876 Sens
1012 Mayence
1181 France
1290 England
1306 France
1348 Switzerland
1349 Hielbronn (Germany)
1349 Hungary
1388 Strasbourg
1394 Germany
1394 France and French Domains, by King Charles
1422 Austria
1424 Fribourg & Zurich
1426 Cologne
1432 Savory
1438 Mainz
1439 Augsburg
1446 Bavaria
1453 Franconis
1453 Breslau
1454 Wurzburg
1485 Vincenza (Italy)
1492 Spain, by Proclamation of King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella
1492-93 Sicily
1495 Lithuania
1496-97 Portugal
1499 Germany
1510 Naples
1514 Strasbourg
1519 Regensburg
1519 Ratisbon, Germany
1527 Florence
1540 Naples
1542 Bohemia
1550 Genoa
1551 Bavaria
1555 Pesaro
1559 Austria
1561 Prague
1567 Wurzburg, Genoese Republic
1569 All Papal Territory except Rome and Ancona
1571 Brandenburg
1582 Netherlands
1593 Brandenburg, Austria
1597 Cremona, Pavia & Lodi
1598 Genoa, Italy
1614 Frankfort
1615 Worms
1619 Kiev
1649 Ukraine
1654 LittleRussia
1656 Lithuania
1669 Oran (North Africa)
1670 Vienna, by Emperor Leopold I
1683 French Possessions in America, by King Louis XIV
1712 Sandomir
1727 Russia
1738 Wurtemburg
1739-40 LittleRussia
1744 Bohemia
1744 Livonia
1745 Moravia
1753 Kovad (Lithuania)
1761 Bordeaux
1772 Jews deported to the Pale of Settlement (Russia)
1774 Prague, Bohemia and Moravia
1775 Warsaw
1789 Alace
1804 Villages in Russia
1808 Villages & Countrysides (Russia)
1815 Lubeck & Bremen
1815 Franconia, Swabia & Bavaria
1820 Bremes
1843 Russian Border Austria & Prussia
1862 Area in the U.S. under Grant's Jurisdiction
1866 Galatz, Romania
1917 Jaffa and Tel Aviv, by Turkish Authorities
1919 Bavaria (foreign born Jews)
1937 Germany
1938-45 Nazi Controlled Areas
1948 Arab Countries (International Jewish Encyclopedia)
all Hitler lovers? I think not.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's Legacy |
01 Nov 2004 07:40:24 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 05:49:27 GMT, "R. Foreman"
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
"eric davis" <ericdavis500@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
A world on the Verge of Destruction. Fundies love it.
eric.
P.S. If Kerry can clean this up, he's Abraham Lincoln.
Abraham Lincoln started the Republican Party. John Kerry is
all Democrat.
Dosen't matter, Republicunt, or Dumbacrat, WAR is still the prime
directive.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's Legacy |
01 Nov 2004 04:50:50 PM |
|
|
"eric davis" <ericdavis500@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<1Ghhd.11512$OD3.390963@news20.bellglobal.com>...
A world on the Verge of Destruction. Fundies love it.
eric.
P.S. If Kerry can clean this up, he's Abraham Lincoln.
Is Kerry a Republican now? WOW ;) Is this another sign of your
intelligence tard? Or are we just supposed to accept whatever you say
as Gospel? ;)
.
|
|
|
| User: "eric davis" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's Legacy |
01 Nov 2004 08:13:45 PM |
|
|
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0411011450.4000a426@posting.google.com...
"eric davis" <ericdavis500@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<1Ghhd.11512$OD3.390963@news20.bellglobal.com>...
A world on the Verge of Destruction. Fundies love it.
eric.
P.S. If Kerry can clean this up, he's Abraham Lincoln.
Is Kerry a Republican now? WOW ;) Is this another sign of your
intelligence tard? Or are we just supposed to accept whatever you say
as Gospel? ;)
Is Bush a Republican? Nope. He stands for nothing traditional Republicans
have stood for - fiscal responsibility, aversion to
nation-building(destroying), and so on.
Listen, are you really as dumb as the Post you seem to be? Put your moronic
Partisanship aside for a second. Lincoln, almost all would agree was a
Great President. Believe it or not, America has had Great Presidents, both
Democrat, and Republican --- Great to the extent that most sensible people
don't see them as one party, nor the other, just Great American Presidents.
It would take an Abraham Lincoln, or Franklin Roosevelt to clean up the Mess
the Moron-in-Chief has made.
eric.
P.S. Anyway, moron, get used to President Kerry, as he kicks the Chimp's
*****. Kerry could turn out to be a Great President. God knows America needs
one now.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's Legacy |
02 Nov 2004 11:51:04 AM |
|
|
"eric davis" <ericdavis500@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<0tzhd.12027$OD3.556869@news20.bellglobal.com>...
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0411011450.4000a426@posting.google.com...
"eric davis" <ericdavis500@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<1Ghhd.11512$OD3.390963@news20.bellglobal.com>...
A world on the Verge of Destruction. Fundies love it.
eric.
P.S. If Kerry can clean this up, he's Abraham Lincoln.
Is Kerry a Republican now? WOW ;) Is this another sign of your
intelligence tard? Or are we just supposed to accept whatever you say
as Gospel? ;)
Is Bush a Republican?
So what is Kerry a Right-winger? Did you hear that he is selling
Nuclear material to Iran in the news, if elected? Special interest
groups contributed to him campaign for the promises from the Buffoon
- as long as they do not make nuclear weapons.
Bwahahahahahahahahaha
He is a Clinton drone.
IRAN - are you series. They do not need alternative energy , they have
plenty of oil to make energy. You see retard, you never got into a
moral argument with me because I can slaughter you in that department.
We can start in the early '90s with Clinton building a small water
nuclear reactor that is now N. Koreas head place for WMD program (
They harvest Plutonium there). I never saw you complain about this
tard? ;) You see you are already losing your moral argument tard ;) I
can start next by the transfer of hardened radiation chips that are
only used in ( High altitude) satellites and nuclear weapons to China
from Clinton. Also nose cone designs for multiple weapons - and what
about soft ware for nuclear atmospheric missile guidance. Then we can
go to Clinton allowing Americans to shoot off missiles in China where
they take the technology and now put the nuclear warheads on –
It seems Clinton was a REAL terrorist and you have been silent, eh
crap-tard? ;) So when you bring up your moral ***** with me I laugh in
your fucki' face.
Nope. He stands for nothing traditional Republicans
have stood for - fiscal responsibility, aversion to
nation-building(destroying),
Clinton started Nation building in American history tard. Get it
through your stupid head and you have not complained one iota? ;) You
harp on Bush like a retarded crap-boy does.
and so on.
so on is your lies and distortions of morality, eh?
Listen, are you really as dumb as the Post you seem to be?
I like to see you seriously respond to these issues , eh tardy-pooo?
;)
Put your moronic
Partisanship aside
To support terrorist like you do because of your silence on Clinton
proliferation of WMD? You have become numb to nuclear weapons in the
hands of extreme dictators leaders that can happen in the future.
for a second. Lincoln, almost all would agree was a
Great President.
That is a run-on sentence and made no sense. Come on do not waste my
time *****.
Believe it or not, America has had Great Presidents, both
Democrat, and Republican --- Great to the extent that most sensible people
don't see them as one party, nor the other,
Agree
just Great American Presidents.
It would take an Abraham Lincoln, or Franklin Roosevelt to clean up the Mess
the Moron-in-Chief has made.
That your opinion, but that does not deal with the moral issues you
bring to this group. You are accusing me of something you do. If you
can disprove (wrong) of what I said about Clinton and his
proliferation of dangerous tech to unstable, not-trusted states than I
will apologize and admit you are right. But, I have a feeling you
cannot. ;)
eric.
P.S. Anyway, moron,
You sure are.
get used to President Kerry, as he kicks the Chimp's
*****. Kerry could turn out to be a Great President. God knows America needs
one now.
If Kerry is elected, then I have to follow my pres. Like everyone else
- it doesn't mean that I like him. I am still waiting for someone to
tell me his plan for Iraq and the WOT? ;)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's Legacy |
02 Nov 2004 09:04:21 AM |
|
|
eric davis a écrit:
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0411011450.4000a426@posting.google.com...
"eric davis" <ericdavis500@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<1Ghhd.11512$OD3.390963@news20.bellglobal.com>...
A world on the Verge of Destruction. Fundies love it.
eric.
P.S. If Kerry can clean this up, he's Abraham Lincoln.
Is Kerry a Republican now? WOW ;) Is this another sign of your
intelligence tard? Or are we just supposed to accept whatever you say
as Gospel? ;)
Is Bush a Republican? Nope. He stands for nothing traditional Republicans
have stood for - fiscal responsibility, aversion to
nation-building(destroying), and so on.
Only in your weasel's dreams.
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Aidan" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's Legacy |
02 Nov 2004 08:36:39 PM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:SlNhd.3763253$ic1.377937@news.easynews.com...
....
Is Bush a Republican? Nope. He stands for nothing traditional
Republicans
have stood for - fiscal responsibility, aversion to
nation-building(destroying), and so on.
Only in your weasel's dreams.
What? Are you saying Bush does stand for fiscal responsibility, and has an
aversion to nation-building? Or are you saying that traditional Republicans
never stood for anything like that?
Are you capable of making a non-ambiguous statment?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's Legacy |
03 Nov 2004 12:02:00 PM |
|
|
"Aidan" <nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> wrote in message news:<newscache$ue6l6i$1e1$1@titan.linknet.com.au>...
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:SlNhd.3763253$ic1.377937@news.easynews.com...
...
Is Bush a Republican? Nope. He stands for nothing traditional
Republicans
have stood for - fiscal responsibility, aversion to
nation-building(destroying), and so on.
Only in your weasel's dreams.
What? Are you saying Bush does stand for fiscal responsibility, and has an
aversion to nation-building? Or are you saying that traditional Republicans
never stood for anything like that?
Are you capable of making a non-ambiguous statment?
If you read Eric orginial reply you will see that it is factual false,
tard.
"He stands for nothing traditional Republicans have stood for" Eric.
I can go on all day with traditional stuff Bush stands for. This
statement from Eric is not true. But, heah, you are too stupid to
understand what is being said and accuse others of being ambiguous -
it's not their fault but yours idiot.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Aidan" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's Legacy |
04 Nov 2004 05:48:41 PM |
|
|
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0411031002.786449cf@posting.google.com...
"Aidan" <nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> wrote in message
news:<newscache$ue6l6i$1e1$1@titan.linknet.com.au>...
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:SlNhd.3763253$ic1.377937@news.easynews.com...
...
Is Bush a Republican? Nope. He stands for nothing traditional
Republicans
have stood for - fiscal responsibility, aversion to
nation-building(destroying), and so on.
Only in your weasel's dreams.
What? Are you saying Bush does stand for fiscal responsibility, and has
an
aversion to nation-building? Or are you saying that traditional
Republicans
never stood for anything like that?
Are you capable of making a non-ambiguous statment?
If you read Eric orginial reply you will see that it is factual false,
tard.
"He stands for nothing traditional Republicans have stood for" Eric.
I can go on all day with traditional stuff Bush stands for.
Like fiscal responsibilty, and not being Nation-builders?
Dig on MickyD, dig on deeper.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush's Legacy |
01 Nov 2004 07:39:07 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 22:00:09 -0800, "eric davis"
<ericdavis500@hotmail.com> wrote:
A world on the Verge of Destruction. Fundies love it.
eric.
P.S. If Kerry can clean this up, he's Abraham Lincoln.
Hahahaha, Kerry won't clean it up either. He is another one of those
Skull and Bones idiots who dance to the toon of their handler.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
