Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds?



 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: "LEM"
Date: 09 Jan 2004 01:33:57 PM
Object: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In fact sending a man or woman anywhere into outer space,
meaning anywhere beyond low-earth orbit of 250-300 miles
which is nowhere near "outer" space, since even the Moon
is ONE THOUSAND TIMES further out in space than any rust-
bucket "shuttle" would ever dare venture, sending humans
into outer space would be like roasting them over a fire.
Now I like GW Bush, but he knows a man can't survive any-
where beyond the safety of low-earth orbit for more than
just a few hours. It can't be done. It's just a campaign
subterfuge. Otherwise I completely support our appointed-
not-elected President of the US. Bush has no competetion
in 2004. Pinko demo-sluts like Dean, or Clark ad nauseam,
are only getting support from anti-American heathen scum.
Bush will easily win in an absolute landslide, and he'll
be officially elected President of the United States for
the first time. And all the demo-sluts can roast in hell
with their favorite murdering butt-buddies Saddam & Sons.
*All Apollo Moon Missions Were Unmanned:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=VTKA4X1O37500.9704861111@Gilgamesh-frog.org

*Uncensored Apollo Moon Hoax Bookmarks:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=7RL5KJIX37499.1691435185@Gilgamesh-frog.org
Given all the inflated hyperbole about "space races" and
"space walks" etc, let's put this thing into a realistic
perspective. Unmanned space vehicles & space instruments
certainly can and have routinely navigated the best part
of our solar system, with some vehicles wondering beyond
it as final contact is lost and the derelict contraption
ventures silently into the vast reaches of caelestial ob-
livion. That's great and is something JPL/NASA and other
space agencies and their host nations are understandably
very proud of. However, when any manned space vehicle is
launched into low-earth orbit far below the Van Allen ra-
diation Belt, and fisheye lenses make it appear that the
vehicle is orbiting twice as far above Earth than it act-
ually is--within two to three hundred miles tops--that's
a very long way from the Moon's orbit, to wit a thousand
times closer! Here in the 21st century, 250-300 miles is
as high above the Earth as any manned vehicle can safely
orbit. And even then the radiation is quite hazardous to
the crew, severely limiting the time they'll spend doing
extra-vehicular activity for their own safety. The early
cosmonauts tried to brave the Van Allen Belt in the late
1950s, and they learned fast that that was a big mistake
after a few would-be space men were roasted like a marsh-
mallow over an open fire. So let's be honest about "moon
walks" and other space-age propaganda. We've heard their
lame excuses about why they haven't returned to the Moon
with any manned missions. The real reason that they have
not returned is because only unmanned missions ever went
in the first place. And not only this, but they've never
sent any manned vehicle beyond so much as one-thousandth
the distance to the Moon. Think about it. Not one rocket
or shuttle with any living human beings on board can fly
beyond a mere 1/1000th of the distance to the Moon. Thus
their excuse that "it's too expensive to go back" to the
Moon is nothing but a red herring. In nearly thirty-five
years they've never even once sent a manned mission into
the Van Allen Belt for any significant length of time or
significant altitude. Have you ever seen a space shuttle
travel, say, just ten thousand miles above the Earth? No,
never. All they have are lame excuses. We know the truth.
Very Truly Yours,
Daniel Joseph Min
*Min's Interlinear Translation of the Apocalypse:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=N8G8XLYW37986.0680439815@Gilgamesh-Frog.org
*Min's Newsgroup-Archived Home Page On The World Wide Web:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=5YTK57VH37948.6355092593@Gilgamesh-frog.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQABRXZljD7YrHM/nEQLh3gCeKD4Iiv/VXznpa44YprOcXoZoJ2AAoPtY
OhpATd2MYZ5BGSF4vZTYqWd8
=3hyb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.

User: "Jay Windley"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 09 Jan 2004 03:48:07 PM
"LEM" <larry3467@free.telescopes.org> wrote in message
news:Q9D7PXNG37995.8569097222@Gilgamesh-Frog.org...
| never. All they have are lame excuses. We know the truth.
|
| Very Truly Yours,
| Daniel Joseph Min
.... and once again Min displays his utter disinterest in what's wrong with
what he says.
--
|
The universe is not required to conform | Jay Windley
to the expectations of the ignorant. | webmaster @ clavius.org
.
User: "Saint Isidore of Laytonville"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 09 Jan 2004 04:05:30 PM
http://www.clavius.org/
ROCKS BIG TIME!
I sent Dubya the
URL for his review
and to give him some
idearles -- with his
'Moon Base'
project.
Speaking of a potential
moon base -- I did free
base a few times with
Doctor Dan back in 1982
and we all most got a
moon base
going then.
The Psychedelick Pope
Saint Isidore of Laytonville
^Ö^ Patron Saint of the Internet ^Ö^
°°^Ö^ °°
http://apple2.org.za/gswv/me

AOXOMOXOA and ENESSA QUA ONNICA
.


User: "LEM"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 12 Jan 2004 08:36:23 AM
"Volker Hetzer" pleaded for mercy:

You didn't answer my question. Are you afraid of being proven wrong?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
______________________
{ }
| MYTH THAT MAN WENT |
| ONE THOUSAND TIMES |
| FURTHER INTO SPACE |
| IN 1969-1972, THAN |
| MAN HAS EVER BEEN |
| ABLE TO GO SINCE, |
| MORE THAN A THIRD |
| OF A CENTURY LATER |
| AND COUNTING...D.M. |
| |
| DIIS MANIBVS |
| |
| R.I.P. |
| |
| |
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
P.S. Don't forget to check under your coffin pillow ;)
Daniel Joseph Min
*All Apollo Moon Missions Were Unmanned:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=VTKA4X1O37500.9704861111@Gilgamesh-frog.org
*Uncensored Apollo Moon Hoax Bookmarks:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=7RL5KJIX37499.1691435185@Gilgamesh-frog.org
*Min's Interlinear Translation of the Apocalypse:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=N8G8XLYW37986.0680439815@Gilgamesh-Frog.org
*Min's Newsgroup-Archived Home Page On The World Wide Web:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=5YTK57VH37948.6355092593@Gilgamesh-frog.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQAP/s5ljD7YrHM/nEQJ0+gCgiSuedGVQROAStlYdAbat25bgElgAn2Hm
nDNaXHk1qXC/T9srY7FhPRbV
=9MoQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
User: "Jay Windley"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 12 Jan 2004 04:20:26 PM
"LEM" <larry3467@free.telescopes.org> wrote in message
news:F5T5107537998.6487384259@Gilgamesh-Frog.org...
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| ______________________
| { }
| | MYTH THAT MAN WENT |
| | ONE THOUSAND TIMES |
| | FURTHER INTO SPACE |
| | IN 1969-1972, THAN |
| | MAN HAS EVER BEEN |
| | ABLE TO GO SINCE, |
| | MORE THAN A THIRD |
| | OF A CENTURY LATER |
| | AND COUNTING...D.M. |
| | |
| | DIIS MANIBVS |
| | |
| | R.I.P. |
| | |
| | |
| /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Why is it supposed to follow that, having done it once -- or six times --
one *must* continue doing it in order to validate or authenticate those
previous times? Your headstone is nothing but a big non sequitur.
"Able to go" implies many things. If a boy goes skiing one day, but his
mother forbids him from going the next day, is that previous day's
experience all of a sudden suspect? Does the subsequent statement, "I can't
go skiing" imply that one is not allowed to do it, or that one lacks the
skills to do it?
You look at the paucity of manned exploration and try to imply one cause for
it (technical inability) when it's more likely to be a different cause (lack
of interest).
"If they had the technology then, why can't they have maintained it? We
should have it today too." Why? If you can't answer that question and show
evidence for it, you haven't thought through your argument well enough.
Might there be reasons other than radiation why we haven't ventured outside
the Van Allen belts?
--
|
The universe is not required to conform | Jay Windley
to the expectations of the ignorant. | webmaster @ clavius.org
.
User: "Saint Isidore of Laytonville"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 12 Jan 2004 07:15:14 PM
I perfer Cincinnatti chili over Van Allen belts any day!
The Psychedelick Pope
Saint Isidore of Laytonville
^Ö^ Patron Saint of the Internet ^Ö^
°°^Ö^ °°
http://apple2.org.za/gswv/me

AOXOMOXOA and ENESSA QUA ONNICA
.


User: "PudThumper"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 13 Jan 2004 04:38:46 PM
Fixed your post.
On 1/12/04 2:36 PM, in article F5T5107537998.6487384259@Gilgamesh-Frog.org,
"LEM" <larry3467@free.telescopes.org> wrote:

"Volker Hetzer" pleaded for mercy:

You didn't answer my question. Are you afraid of being proven wrong?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

______________________
{ }
| MYTH THAT MAN WENT |
| ONE THOUSAND TIMES |
| FURTHER INTO SPACE |
| IN 1969-1972, THAN |
| MAN HAS EVER |
| ATTEMPETD TO GO |
| IN MORE THAN A THIRD|
| OF A CENTURY SINCE, |
| AND COUNTING...D.M. |
| |
| DIIS MANIBVS |
| |
| R.I.P. |
| |
| |
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\



P.S. Don't forget to check under your coffin pillow ;)





Daniel Joseph Min

*All Apollo Moon Missions Were Unmanned:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=VTKA4X1O37500.9704861111@Gilgamesh-frog.o
rg

*Uncensored Apollo Moon Hoax Bookmarks:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=7RL5KJIX37499.1691435185@Gilgamesh-frog.o
rg

*Min's Interlinear Translation of the Apocalypse:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=N8G8XLYW37986.0680439815@Gilgamesh-Frog.o
rg

*Min's Newsgroup-Archived Home Page On The World Wide Web:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=5YTK57VH37948.6355092593@Gilgamesh-frog.o
rg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQAP/s5ljD7YrHM/nEQJ0+gCgiSuedGVQROAStlYdAbat25bgElgAn2Hm
nDNaXHk1qXC/T9srY7FhPRbV
=9MoQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


.

User: "Saint Isidore of Laytonville"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 12 Jan 2004 03:10:10 PM
I think he's about to bring out the UFO's from Area 51
etc.
The Psychedelick Pope
Saint Isidore of Laytonville
^Ö^ Patron Saint of the Internet ^Ö^
°°^Ö^ °°
http://apple2.org.za/gswv/me

AOXOMOXOA and ENESSA QUA ONNICA
.

User: "Brian Wirthlin"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 19 Jan 2004 01:32:35 PM
The following is from 'Life on the Mississippi' by Mark Twain.
To say that De Soto, the first white man who ever saw the Mississippi River,
saw it in 1542, is a remark which states a fact without interpreting it:
it is something like giving the dimensions of a sunset by astronomical
measurements, and cataloguing the colors by their scientific names;--as a
result, you get the bald fact of the sunset, but you don't see the sunset.
It would have been better to paint a picture of it.
....
De Soto merely glimpsed the river, then died and was buried
in it by his priests and soldiers. One would expect the priests
and the soldiers to multiply the river's dimensions by ten--
the Spanish custom of the day--and thus move other adventurers
to go at once and explore it. On the contrary, their narratives
when they reached home, did not excite that amount of curiosity.
The Mississippi was left unvisited by whites during a term
of years which seems incredible in our energetic days.
One may 'sense' the interval to his mind, after a fashion,
by dividing it up in this way: After De Soto glimpsed the river,
a fraction short of a quarter of a century elapsed, and then
Shakespeare was born; lived a trifle more than half a century,
then died; and when he had been in his grave considerably more
than half a century, the SECOND white man saw the Mississippi.
----
Imagine that - after all - you seem to be good at imagining things.
Brian
LEM <larry3467@free.telescopes.org> wrote in message news:<F5T5107537998.6487384259@Gilgamesh-Frog.org>...

"Volker Hetzer" pleaded for mercy:

You didn't answer my question. Are you afraid of being proven wrong?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

______________________
{ }
| MYTH THAT MAN WENT |
| ONE THOUSAND TIMES |
| FURTHER INTO SPACE |
| IN 1969-1972, THAN |
| MAN HAS EVER BEEN |
| ABLE TO GO SINCE, |
| MORE THAN A THIRD |
| OF A CENTURY LATER |
| AND COUNTING...D.M. |
| |
| DIIS MANIBVS |
| |
| R.I.P. |
| |
| |
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\



P.S. Don't forget to check under your coffin pillow ;)





Daniel Joseph Min

*All Apollo Moon Missions Were Unmanned:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=VTKA4X1O37500.9704861111@Gilgamesh-frog.org

*Uncensored Apollo Moon Hoax Bookmarks:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=7RL5KJIX37499.1691435185@Gilgamesh-frog.org

*Min's Interlinear Translation of the Apocalypse:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=N8G8XLYW37986.0680439815@Gilgamesh-Frog.org

*Min's Newsgroup-Archived Home Page On The World Wide Web:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=5YTK57VH37948.6355092593@Gilgamesh-frog.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQAP/s5ljD7YrHM/nEQJ0+gCgiSuedGVQROAStlYdAbat25bgElgAn2Hm
nDNaXHk1qXC/T9srY7FhPRbV
=9MoQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

.

User: "beavith"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 14 Jan 2004 09:23:14 AM
i can't believe i'm doing this.....
responding to a troll. this is just plain wrong....
when old Orville and Wilbur managed to succeed at Kitty Hawk, they
were so tight lipped about it, most of the world thought it was a
scam.
i forget. did they succeed or was that all apocryphal, too?
.


User: "Morehits4u"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 12 Jan 2004 12:59:48 AM

Subject: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds?
From: LEM

< snip >
London Bookies will give you very good
odds...and then Bush talks about
man mission to Mars...yeah right ..it will
break the bank and anyway i dont think
it can be done... But what the hell do i
know :) It is an election year bunch of
bullsh*t
.

User: "Jean Guernon"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 10 Jan 2004 01:33:44 PM
At least it will prove to you that you were totally in the potatoes once
again for thinking that the first moon landing was a set up, if we
establish a colony on the Moon or Mars, won't it?
J.
LEM a écrit:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In fact sending a man or woman anywhere into outer space,
meaning anywhere beyond low-earth orbit of 250-300 miles
which is nowhere near "outer" space, since even the Moon
is ONE THOUSAND TIMES further out in space than any rust-
bucket "shuttle" would ever dare venture, sending humans
into outer space would be like roasting them over a fire.
Now I like GW Bush, but he knows a man can't survive any-
where beyond the safety of low-earth orbit for more than
just a few hours. It can't be done. It's just a campaign
subterfuge. Otherwise I completely support our appointed-
not-elected President of the US. Bush has no competetion
in 2004. Pinko demo-sluts like Dean, or Clark ad nauseam,
are only getting support from anti-American heathen scum.
Bush will easily win in an absolute landslide, and he'll
be officially elected President of the United States for
the first time. And all the demo-sluts can roast in hell
with their favorite murdering butt-buddies Saddam & Sons.

*All Apollo Moon Missions Were Unmanned:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=VTKA4X1O37500.9704861111@Gilgamesh-frog.org

*Uncensored Apollo Moon Hoax Bookmarks:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=7RL5KJIX37499.1691435185@Gilgamesh-frog.org

Given all the inflated hyperbole about "space races" and
"space walks" etc, let's put this thing into a realistic
perspective. Unmanned space vehicles & space instruments
certainly can and have routinely navigated the best part
of our solar system, with some vehicles wondering beyond
it as final contact is lost and the derelict contraption
ventures silently into the vast reaches of caelestial ob-
livion. That's great and is something JPL/NASA and other
space agencies and their host nations are understandably
very proud of. However, when any manned space vehicle is
launched into low-earth orbit far below the Van Allen ra-
diation Belt, and fisheye lenses make it appear that the
vehicle is orbiting twice as far above Earth than it act-
ually is--within two to three hundred miles tops--that's
a very long way from the Moon's orbit, to wit a thousand
times closer! Here in the 21st century, 250-300 miles is
as high above the Earth as any manned vehicle can safely
orbit. And even then the radiation is quite hazardous to
the crew, severely limiting the time they'll spend doing
extra-vehicular activity for their own safety. The early
cosmonauts tried to brave the Van Allen Belt in the late
1950s, and they learned fast that that was a big mistake
after a few would-be space men were roasted like a marsh-
mallow over an open fire. So let's be honest about "moon
walks" and other space-age propaganda. We've heard their
lame excuses about why they haven't returned to the Moon
with any manned missions. The real reason that they have
not returned is because only unmanned missions ever went
in the first place. And not only this, but they've never
sent any manned vehicle beyond so much as one-thousandth
the distance to the Moon. Think about it. Not one rocket
or shuttle with any living human beings on board can fly
beyond a mere 1/1000th of the distance to the Moon. Thus
their excuse that "it's too expensive to go back" to the
Moon is nothing but a red herring. In nearly thirty-five
years they've never even once sent a manned mission into
the Van Allen Belt for any significant length of time or
significant altitude. Have you ever seen a space shuttle
travel, say, just ten thousand miles above the Earth? No,
never. All they have are lame excuses. We know the truth.

Very Truly Yours,
Daniel Joseph Min

*Min's Interlinear Translation of the Apocalypse:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=N8G8XLYW37986.0680439815@Gilgamesh-Frog.org

*Min's Newsgroup-Archived Home Page On The World Wide Web:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=5YTK57VH37948.6355092593@Gilgamesh-frog.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQABRXZljD7YrHM/nEQLh3gCeKD4Iiv/VXznpa44YprOcXoZoJ2AAoPtY
OhpATd2MYZ5BGSF4vZTYqWd8
=3hyb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

.
User: "Cliff Wright"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 20 Jan 2004 04:51:47 PM
Jean Guernon wrote:

At least it will prove to you that you were totally in the potatoes once
again for thinking that the first moon landing was a set up, if we
establish a colony on the Moon or Mars, won't it?

J.



LEM a écrit:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In fact sending a man or woman anywhere into outer space,
meaning anywhere beyond low-earth orbit of 250-300 miles
which is nowhere near "outer" space, since even the Moon
is ONE THOUSAND TIMES further out in space than any rust-
bucket "shuttle" would ever dare venture, sending humans
into outer space would be like roasting them over a fire.
Now I like GW Bush, but he knows a man can't survive any-
where beyond the safety of low-earth orbit for more than
just a few hours. It can't be done. It's just a campaign
subterfuge. Otherwise I completely support our appointed-
not-elected President of the US. Bush has no competetion
in 2004. Pinko demo-sluts like Dean, or Clark ad nauseam,
are only getting support from anti-American heathen scum.
Bush will easily win in an absolute landslide, and he'll
be officially elected President of the United States for
the first time. And all the demo-sluts can roast in hell
with their favorite murdering butt-buddies Saddam & Sons.

*All Apollo Moon Missions Were Unmanned:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=VTKA4X1O37500.9704861111@Gilgamesh-frog.org
*Uncensored Apollo Moon Hoax Bookmarks:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=7RL5KJIX37499.1691435185@Gilgamesh-frog.org


Given all the inflated hyperbole about "space races" and
"space walks" etc, let's put this thing into a realistic
perspective. Unmanned space vehicles & space instruments
certainly can and have routinely navigated the best part
of our solar system, with some vehicles wondering beyond
it as final contact is lost and the derelict contraption
ventures silently into the vast reaches of caelestial ob-
livion. That's great and is something JPL/NASA and other
space agencies and their host nations are understandably
very proud of. However, when any manned space vehicle is
launched into low-earth orbit far below the Van Allen ra-
diation Belt, and fisheye lenses make it appear that the
vehicle is orbiting twice as far above Earth than it act-
ually is--within two to three hundred miles tops--that's
a very long way from the Moon's orbit, to wit a thousand
times closer! Here in the 21st century, 250-300 miles is
as high above the Earth as any manned vehicle can safely
orbit. And even then the radiation is quite hazardous to
the crew, severely limiting the time they'll spend doing
extra-vehicular activity for their own safety. The early
cosmonauts tried to brave the Van Allen Belt in the late
1950s, and they learned fast that that was a big mistake
after a few would-be space men were roasted like a marsh-
mallow over an open fire. So let's be honest about "moon
walks" and other space-age propaganda. We've heard their
lame excuses about why they haven't returned to the Moon
with any manned missions. The real reason that they have
not returned is because only unmanned missions ever went
in the first place. And not only this, but they've never
sent any manned vehicle beyond so much as one-thousandth
the distance to the Moon. Think about it. Not one rocket
or shuttle with any living human beings on board can fly
beyond a mere 1/1000th of the distance to the Moon. Thus
their excuse that "it's too expensive to go back" to the
Moon is nothing but a red herring. In nearly thirty-five
years they've never even once sent a manned mission into
the Van Allen Belt for any significant length of time or
significant altitude. Have you ever seen a space shuttle
travel, say, just ten thousand miles above the Earth? No,
never. All they have are lame excuses. We know the truth.

Very Truly Yours,
Daniel Joseph Min

*Min's Interlinear Translation of the Apocalypse:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=N8G8XLYW37986.0680439815@Gilgamesh-Frog.org


*Min's Newsgroup-Archived Home Page On The World Wide Web:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=5YTK57VH37948.6355092593@Gilgamesh-frog.org


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQABRXZljD7YrHM/nEQLh3gCeKD4Iiv/VXznpa44YprOcXoZoJ2AAoPtY
OhpATd2MYZ5BGSF4vZTYqWd8
=3hyb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Cor Strewth!!!

I read about this guy's grandfather just the other day.
He came from Dayton Ohio and used to read articles by Simon Newcomb in the paper
saying that "Heavier than air flight is impossible" as his trolley car passsed
the Huffman prairie with the Wright Flyer model A buzzing around overhead.
Cliff Wright.
.


User: "Steven Douglas"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 11 Jan 2004 01:01:34 AM
For anyone who has doubts about the Moon landings, here is a science
based article that might be helpful.

The Moon Hoax Debate
http://www.bestofcolumbus.com/Braeunig/space/hoax.htm
.
User: "R. Foreman"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 11 Jan 2004 01:40:44 AM
(Steven Douglas) Spat the Words

For anyone who has doubts about the Moon landings, here is a science
based article that might be helpful.

I saw this movie too. 'Capricorn One'. About a faked moon
shot. Movie was made about 30 years ago.


The Moon Hoax Debate
http://www.bestofcolumbus.com/Braeunig/space/hoax.htm

.
User: "A [Temporary] Dog"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 11 Jan 2004 07:18:17 AM
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 07:40:44 GMT, "R. Foreman"
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> painted a red bull's eye on his
forehead, ascended the altar of Fluffy and shouted:

dsteven@flashmail.com (Steven Douglas) Spat the Words

For anyone who has doubts about the Moon landings, here is a science
based article that might be helpful.


I saw this movie too. 'Capricorn One'. About a faked moon
shot.

Nit: A faked mars landing.

Movie was made about 30 years ago.

Not that he wasn't the best thing in the movie, but I've always
thought it would have been much tighter and more interesting if they'd
gotten rid of Elliote Gould's role and made the wife the one who
suspected something was wrong.
--
- A (Temporary) Dog |"The international fraternity of
"Dog of Disinformation" | clowns, fools and village idiots
The Domain is *erols dot com* | look down on ASCE. At least the
The Name is tempdog | clowns never pushed for a show
Put together as name@domain | 'like LA Law but with *clowns*.'"
.



User: "John Griffin"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 09 Jan 2004 09:56:20 PM
Fucking Idiot Min, using the lame anonym LEM
<larry3467@free.telescopes.org>, wrote:

[ idiotic yammering snipped ]

Shut up, cretin. You have nothing to say, and
you couldn't say it intelligibly if you had.
Since you can't get a job, kill yourself NOW.
.

User: "P. Edward Murray"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 10 Jan 2004 01:12:28 AM
I think we are going to go and here's why.
When both the sitting president and his two possible rivals Governor
Dean &
General Clark all say they want to go back to the Moon and onto Mars
or very close to that, I think the odds are in favor of Americans
doing just that.
It's about time!
Ed
.
User: "John Griffin"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 10 Jan 2004 03:28:07 AM
(P. Edward Murray) wrote:

I think we are going to go and here's why.

When both the sitting president and his two possible rivals
Governor Dean &
General Clark all say they want to go back to the Moon and
onto Mars or very close to that, I think the odds are in
favor of Americans doing just that.

It's about time!

Ed

A 900-mile-wide blob of primordial ice and rock, named The Blob,
has been detected on a course which will collide with Earth in
exactly 51 years. We have to get the hell out of here or find a
way to stop it. The government is keeping this secret, because
that's what governments do, but Bush's plan is the first step in
saving at least a remnant of the human race.
We're going to drill a big hole in the moon and use it as a gun
barrel. (Full choke.) Somewhere around a hundred million metric
tons of moon stuff will be packed into it, with as many ten
megaton nukes as it takes at the bottom. When the nukes go off,
the moon rocks will be fired out of the hole on a trajectory
calculated to impact The Blob somewhere between the orbits of
Mercury and Venus after it passes its last perihelion. If 10
percent of the mass hits The Blob, it will be deflected just
enough to become a satellite of the Moon, and it will be renamed
The G. W. Bush Memorial Moonmoon. For obvious reasons, we only
get two shots. Colonizing Mars is just a backup plan. Families
are being recruited secretly to make up the first outpost.
The Blob has a small companion (about 1/2 kilometer diameter).
No computer time will be wasted trying to figure out how to
alter its course, since it will impact with no harm to the
civilized world, at precisely 21.426N, 39.838E,.
I got this information from a secret sauce.
I wonder how many of those nostradamus things could be
interpreted to fit this all-too-real situation.
.
User: "WH"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 10 Jan 2004 07:35:43 AM
"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:Xns946CDDB190A9thathillbillyyahooco@130.133.1.4...

eddiestardust@yahoo.com (P. Edward Murray) wrote:

I think we are going to go and here's why.

When both the sitting president and his two possible rivals
Governor Dean &
General Clark all say they want to go back to the Moon and
onto Mars or very close to that, I think the odds are in
favor of Americans doing just that.

It's about time!

Ed


A 900-mile-wide blob of primordial ice and rock, named The Blob,
has been detected on a course which will collide with Earth in
exactly 51 years. We have to get the hell out of here or find a
way to stop it. The government is keeping this secret, because
that's what governments do, but Bush's plan is the first step in
saving at least a remnant of the human race.

We're going to drill a big hole in the moon and use it as a gun
barrel. (Full choke.) Somewhere around a hundred million metric
tons of moon stuff will be packed into it, with as many ten
megaton nukes as it takes at the bottom. When the nukes go off,
the moon rocks will be fired out of the hole on a trajectory
calculated to impact The Blob somewhere between the orbits of
Mercury and Venus after it passes its last perihelion. If 10
percent of the mass hits The Blob, it will be deflected just
enough to become a satellite of the Moon, and it will be renamed
The G. W. Bush Memorial Moonmoon. For obvious reasons, we only
get two shots. Colonizing Mars is just a backup plan. Families
are being recruited secretly to make up the first outpost.

Ok now everything is falling into place. That must be why then, that they
arrested whacko Jacko...
....he has the necessary experience living in a bubble, (even his monkey's
called bubbles isin't it?),
but it's all a ploy...jacko's really going to teach potential mars
travellers how to survive living in
a bubble...it can't be easy you know.
WH
.

User: "Saint Isidore of Laytonville"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 10 Jan 2004 04:53:09 PM
The Telons took me on a tour of their base on
the dark side of the moon back in 1982. It was
most impressive too. Not too big -- not to small
but, just right in all respects.
If they could do it on the dark side of the moon -
then bush should be able to do it on the light side.
The Psychedelick Pope
Saint Isidore of Laytonville
^Ö^ Patron Saint of the Internet ^Ö^
°°^Ö^ °°
http://apple2.org.za/gswv/me

AOXOMOXOA and ENESSA QUA ONNICA
.



User: "Saint Isidore of Laytonville"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 09 Jan 2004 02:46:32 PM
I'm sure he will pull it off. After all -- he's got
the full help and support of the grey and the
reptilian aliens that are based on the dark side
of our moon.
The Psychedelick Pope
Saint Isidore of Laytonville
^Ö^ Patron Saint of the Internet ^Ö^
°°^Ö^ °°
http://apple2.org.za/gswv/me

AOXOMOXOA and ENESSA QUA ONNICA
.
User: "Jay"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 09 Jan 2004 11:28:41 PM
"Saint Isidore of Laytonville" <cturley2@aol.comWOMPWOMP> wrote in message
news:20040109154632.15319.00002494@mb-m12.aol.com...

I'm sure he will pull it off. After all -- he's got
the full help and support of the grey and the
reptilian aliens that are based on the dark side
of our moon.

I thought those folks were his domestic economic advisors.....
GW Bush - Everyhing you always wanted to
know but were afraid to research: www.smirkingchimp.com
.
User: "Rick"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 11 Jan 2004 07:24:00 PM
Jay wrote:

"Saint Isidore of Laytonville" <cturley2@aol.comWOMPWOMP> wrote in message
news:20040109154632.15319.00002494@mb-m12.aol.com...

I'm sure he will pull it off. After all -- he's got
the full help and support of the grey and the
reptilian aliens that are based on the dark side
of our moon.


I thought those folks were his domestic economic advisors.....

GW Bush - Everyhing you always wanted to
know but were afraid to research: www.smirkingchimp.com

No, no, no. The *Jews* are the economic advisors, the grey aliens and the
reptilian ones on the dark side of the moon are our friends against the other
bad Star aliens which support the Iron Triangle side that is out to dominant
the Words disguised as German-American Neo-Con Haplotypes that are hiding the
Weapons of Mass Destruction that aren't in Irag that Nostradamus predicted in
one of the Quatrains about a supernatural apparition that appears during one
of the Zodiac Signs.
But I'm no pro at this.
(And you didn't think I would be on topic!)
.
User: "Saint Isidore of Laytonville"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 11 Jan 2004 08:40:34 PM
I'm impressed when anybody is on topic!
The Psychedelick Pope
Saint Isidore of Laytonville
^Ö^ Patron Saint of the Internet ^Ö^
°°^Ö^ °°
http://apple2.org.za/gswv/me

AOXOMOXOA and ENESSA QUA ONNICA
.



User: "Fritzz"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 17 Jan 2004 07:42:50 PM
"Saint Isidore of Laytonville" <cturley2@aol.comWOMPWOMP> wrote in message
news:20040109154632.15319.00002494@mb-m12.aol.com...

I'm sure he will pull it off. After all -- he's got
the full help and support of the grey and the
reptilian aliens that are based on the dark side
of our moon.

and they listen to Pink Floyd.
.

User: "sUSAn B Anthony"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 09 Jan 2004 03:32:56 PM

cturley2@aol.comWOMPWOMP
(Saint=A0Isidore=A0of=A0Laytonville) wrote:
I'm sure he will pull it off. After all -- he's
got the full help and support of the grey
and the reptilian aliens that are based
on the dark side of our moon.

And now......he can count on the support of our spanish speaking alien's
couzins, mothers and brothers who are already US citizens.
I predict another trick up his sleeve to regain the support of the
blacks that he has teed off, that are based on the dark side of Georgia.
Maybe "Mighty Mouse" will save the day!
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0
.
User: "Woodswun"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 09 Jan 2004 04:09:39 PM
In article <22463-3FFF1E08-46@storefull-3211.bay.webtv.net>,
(sUSAn B Anthony) wrote:

cturley2@aol.comWOMPWOMP
(Saint=A0Isidore=A0of=A0Laytonville) wrote:


I'm sure he will pull it off. After all -- he's
got the full help and support of the grey
and the reptilian aliens that are based
on the dark side of our moon.



And now......he can count on the support of our spanish speaking alien's
couzins, mothers and brothers who are already US citizens.

I predict another trick up his sleeve to regain the support of the
blacks that he has teed off, that are based on the dark side of Georgia.

Either that, or he'll find a way to make sure that most of 'em don't make it to
the polls.
Woods
.
User: "WH"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 09 Jan 2004 05:43:52 PM
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:DEFLb.54188$Dq1.23282@twister.nyroc.rr.com...

In article <22463-3FFF1E08-46@storefull-3211.bay.webtv.net>,

tugbertswife@webtv.net (sUSAn B Anthony) wrote:

cturley2@aol.comWOMPWOMP
(Saint=A0Isidore=A0of=A0Laytonville) wrote:


I'm sure he will pull it off. After all -- he's
got the full help and support of the grey
and the reptilian aliens that are based
on the dark side of our moon.



And now......he can count on the support of our spanish speaking alien's
couzins, mothers and brothers who are already US citizens.

I predict another trick up his sleeve to regain the support of the
blacks that he has teed off, that are based on the dark side of Georgia.


Either that, or he'll find a way to make sure that most of 'em don't make

it to

the polls.

Woods

By sending them all to the moon perhaps?
WH
.

User: "sUSAn B Anthony"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 11 Jan 2004 10:00:59 PM

woodswun wrote:

sUSAn B Anthony wrote:
I predict another trick up his sleeve to
regain the support of the blacks that he
has teed off, that are based on the
dark side of Georgia.

Either that, or he'll find a way to make
sure that most of 'em don't make it to
the polls.

How would he do that? Have them all arrested on felony charges?
That's a whole lot of felony charges!
We're talkin Georgia here.

Woods

.




User: "Dats Me"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 09 Jan 2004 09:59:55 PM
On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:33:57 +0000, LEM wrote:
Do you know?
Not once did I see either a "tounge in cheek" or "giggling insanely"
emoticon in that message.
How strange!
.

User: "LEM"

Title: Re: Bush's Moon Base. What are the odds? 09 Jan 2004 04:01:19 PM
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, "Volker Hetzer" wrote:

"LEM" <larry3467@free.telescopes.org> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news<Q9D7PXNG37995.8569097222@Gilgamesh-Frog.org...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In fact sending a man or woman anywhere into outer space,
meaning anywhere beyond low-earth orbit of 250-300 miles
which is nowhere near "outer" space, since even the Moon
is ONE THOUSAND TIMES further out in space than any rust-
bucket "shuttle" would ever dare venture, sending humans
into outer space would be like roasting them over a fire.
Now I like GW Bush, but he knows a man can't survive any-
where beyond the safety of low-earth orbit for more than
just a few hours. It can't be done. It's just a campaign
subterfuge.

So, in case NASA got on with it, what would you regard
as proof of astronauts on the moon this time round?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Since the
extant evidence of the alleged "manned" missions is so full
of holes you could drain the Pacific Ocean through it, plus
more than a third of a century later not even one of NASA's
manned spacecraft has ever been built to exceed a mere drop
in the bucket above Earth's own sealevel--here in the space-
age of "nanotechnology", digital wireless, high-performance
materials and 4 Ghz personal computers...at Wal*Mart prices!
Reflecting on all the technological advances even since The
Beatles were still together, Jimi Hendrix was still jamming,
Kubrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey" was still playing at thea-
tres and drive-ins, Haight-Asbury was still a cool place to
visit, M80s cost 25 cents apiece in Frisco's Chinatown, the
Vietnam "police-action" was still going strong and RM Nixon
had recently been inagurated as President, hippies & flower-
children, the hell's angels, and gypsy jokers were pounding
the streets with their unmuffled choppers and black leather
outfits with jeans so smelly not even a Tasmanian devil can
get near 'em, Jack-in-the-box restaurants were sprouting up
like spring daisies, maxed-out muscle cars were laying down
yards of rubber at every green light, blacklight posters or
concert adverts tacked on the telephone poles, and taped to
every teenager's bedroom walls etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.

So sure if you want to believe that men walked ONE THOUSAND
TIMES further out in space than any manned NASA spacecrafts
have been able to navigate since Led Zeppelin was recording
their third album, you go ahead and keep believing it...and
feel free to believe in the tooth fairy! I prefer the facts
of the matter. If a man claims to go to the Moon in a space-
craft, then that man needs to prove--beyond any shadow of a
doubt--that he in-deed and in-fact did accomplish what he's
merely claimed to have done if he expects reasonable people
to believe that he's actually done it. Doctored up pictures
from under top-top-secret domes at Area51 don't cut it. The
"proof" that man walked on the Moon is not just flimsy it's
unable to hold water much less to convince a reasonable man.
But you can keep believing in the tooth fairy if you prefer.
Very Truly Yours,
Daniel Joseph Min
*All Apollo Moon Missions Were Unmanned:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=VTKA4X1O37500.9704861111@Gilgamesh-frog.org
*Uncensored Apollo Moon Hoax Bookmarks:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=7RL5KJIX37499.1691435185@Gilgamesh-frog.org
*Min's Interlinear Translation of the Apocalypse:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=N8G8XLYW37986.0680439815@Gilgamesh-Frog.org

*Min's Newsgroup-Archived Home Page On The World Wide Web:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=5YTK57VH37948.6355092593@Gilgamesh-frog.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQAB0LZljD7YrHM/nEQLm/QCffOIo6pmJmB7mDJVmnGWZSSe5nKMAoPg+
qlUKfQFRzYJ2cE0g+GauinYP
=ZaGl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER