On 19 Dec, 03:05, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:

"TOH100" <toh...@googlemail.com> wrote in message

news:6c66fe34-227a-49f0-9cde-959061a423a2@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

On 18 Dec, 05:04, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:

"TOH100" <toh...@googlemail.com> wrote in message

news:712961e0-07a9-495e-ae74-f7990e99232e@i72g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...

On 14 Dec, 14:03, Cardinal Chunder
<c...@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote:

TOH100 wrote:

On 11 Dec, 12:38, Cardinal Chunder
<c...@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote:

TOH100 wrote:

In quatrain 9 ofSollog'sXmas Prophecies 2007, it says :
"A killing spree in the Church"

Which never happened.

Why do you lie?

4 people were killed.

2 in a training centre, 2 outside the church. None "in the Church".
And
has been pointed out previously dogshit makes large shopping lists
of
shitty vague predictions just so that you or he can shoehorn them
to
fit
reality after the fact.

WRONG.

Sollogwrote Church with a capital C in his prophecy. When it's
written with a capital C then it can mean a group of people who
share
similar Christian beliefs.

SoSollogwas 100% right as usual and you were 100% WRONG as usual.

If he had written church with a small c then that can have several
meanings including a physical building of worship. But he didn't
write
it that way.

So once againSolloghas shown his genius and mastery of the English
language.

Church murders have been going on for centuries, fella, and a quick
search
on Google can elicit many examples from contemporary times, and many
with
death tolls exceeding the recent church shootings.

A sample --

http://lplcat.lacrosse.lib.wi.us/digitalproject/rossiter/00010001.htm

http://religiousmovements.lib.virginia.edu/nrms/Jonestwn.html

http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Motive_in_Wisconsin_church_murder-suicide...

http://www.denverpost.com/evidence/ci_6453430

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/03/14/national/main679823.shtml

So, the question is: what is the significance ofSollog'spredictions of
murder in the Church (large C, lol)? Since murders have periodically
occurred, and commonly in a series (copycat), why bother to predict
such
a
recurring event? What is the value or purpose of the *warning* ??

Do you realise that a couple of those articles you posted about Church
murders date back to the 70s and 80s? Is that what you call
"contemporary times"?

If you'd been back there withSollog, and the internet was a common
communicative venue, you'd be blowin' your predictions around like the
end
of the world had come for us. You andSollogare a couple of sociopaths who
entertain themselves at the public's expense, and narcissists who elevate
themselves, with their "special knowledge and foresight", above all who
aren't perceptive enough to see your game.
I've asked you -- how many times now? -- what is the social benefit of
such
dire warnings?

You've asked this question before and I told you the answer already.
The answer is on Sollog's website at www.sollogs.com or www.sollog.com.

"Sollog put exact details about 911, the Destruction of New Orleans by
a Hurricane and the Great Tsunami of 2004 into the public domain
BEFORE these historic events occurred to PROVE his warnings about the
coming age of NUKE TERRORISM are real."

Oh, Sollog has JUDGED the legal system of SUSA (Satan USA). It will be
destroyed. "The Acts of God" Sollog warned of will come to pass. SUSA
will be humbled!

We're only here for a short time, and, *****, who knows you or I could be
gone tomorrow or the next minute, so what is the value, the sense, of
laying
out a grim future for people, and then going on about how they're *dumb*
if
they don't believe you, follow your crapola?
As you said to me, you hope I'll be in a major city when a nuke explosion
goes off because you'd rather see me dead, or at least *punished*,
because I
don't buy your andSollog'shorseshit.
I'd call that misanthropic, psychotic, mean-spirited -- and that is part
of
the qualities of a *true prophet* ? No, bubba, it's the characterisitic
of a
sick hateful arrogant tyrannical mind.
Now, addressing your opinion that my examples of church killings is
inadequate to show that past murder events somehow don't parallel the
seriousness of the ones right now -- all I can say is that you can put
yourself at any time in history, bubba, and find *evidence* to support
your
theories, support your prognistications, give sustenance to your
particular
worldview. Any time in history, bubba. The fact that we forget the
details
of most of our daily existence, is to the benefit (and use and
manipulations) of leaders, so-called seers, gurus, media ideologues, et
al.
Our "contemporary times" are simply another interpretation, that varies
with
the individual's viewpoint. Historians will tell you that contemporary
times
are anything in the past few decades, while others, like you for obvious
purposes of supporting thier argument and worldview, want to position
those
contemporary times in a tighter, closer parameter. It's all relative,
really. If church murders occurred, with more deaths and social impact in
the 80's, for example, you andSollogwould reject those incidents as
irrelevant to your most relevant predictions now. Yet, the fact of our
historical civilizational record is that there have been rather intense
periods of mass slaughter in churches. When the Jonestown Massacre
occurred,
with 913 dead, I can well remember as a young man the widespread social
consternation it evoked -- yes, people like yourself were running about
proclaiming religion had turned into an evil or satanic thing, and
generally
humanity was entering some horrid new chapter in history, destined for a
bad
tragic downfall. Civilization to many seemed to be on the rocks, and
people
fretted even more when the Pope John Paul died, and fretted even more
when
his successor was seriously wounded.
Yet, despite these intense periods of shootings and general church
mayhem,
here we still are, going on about our daily mechanizations of living.
Your andSollog'sgrim predictions, whether they, by chance, come true or
not, are irrelevant to the species' grinding redundant misbehaviour,
which
at times throughout the centuries, appeared to be reaching an
"apocalypse."
Bad times come, as good ones come, too, and humanity struggles through a
finite, uncertain life span and it certainly isn't benefited by knowing
it
has a dreary future life laid out in detail for it. It's already had
plenty
of bad periods and will have more, but knowin the details of any of it,
doesn't alter the fact that you and I, all of us, still have to grapple
with
the everyday problems of life, sickness, old age, deaths of loved ones,
financial strains, lousy leaders, ad nauseam. As a sick hobby, I can
understand your andSollog'spreoccupation with grim future events, but
you're not helping any of us. Let's get that straight, huh? You're not
humanitarians. You'll grow old and wither away, asSollogwill, and all
your
alleged "visions" won't save you from the same scary fate we all face --
a
common, rather unexciting fate, to be sure, but more likely the most
relevant.
Doc

What your articles prove is that these attacks are not as common as
you are claiming they are. In fact, they are quite rare. I think you
are in denial about this hit.

The answer to your question, "What is the value or purpose of the
*warning* ??" can be found on the main page ofSollog'swebsite at
www.sollogs.comorwww.sollog.com:

"Sollogput exact details about 911, the Destruction of New Orleans by
a Hurricane and the Great Tsunami of 2004 into the public domain
BEFORE these historic events occurred to PROVE his warnings about the
coming age of NUKE TERRORISM are real."