Right then you lot, lets end this ridiculous discussion about whether
Muhammad was a paedofile or not shall we?
We'll give, to satisfy douglas and Jane, the credit for paedofili to
Muhammad shall we, whilst we'll take responsibility, we Christians
through Adam and Eve, for Incest!
How 'bout that then? Is that fair. I think it makes it just about even!
WH
.
|
|
| User: "WH" |
|
| Title: Re: Compromise about Muhammad |
09 Nov 2005 01:59:52 AM |
|
|
WH skrev:
Right then you lot, lets end this ridiculous discussion about whether
Muhammad was a paedofile or not shall we?
We'll give, to satisfy douglas and Jane, the credit for paedofili to
Muhammad shall we, whilst we'll take responsibility, we Christians
through Adam and Eve, for Incest!
How 'bout that then? Is that fair. I think it makes it just about even!
WH
Come to think of it we, Christians, could also take the responsibility
for DUI seeing as Jesus used to turn water into wine...and I doubt it
was alcohol free wine he was mirakelling 'cos that wasn't even invented
in those days!
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Compromise about Muhammad |
09 Nov 2005 06:58:21 AM |
|
|
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131523192.130137.197420@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
WH skrev:
Right then you lot, lets end this ridiculous discussion about whether
Muhammad was a paedofile or not shall we?
We'll give, to satisfy douglas and Jane, the credit for paedofili to
Muhammad shall we, whilst we'll take responsibility, we Christians
through Adam and Eve, for Incest!
How 'bout that then? Is that fair. I think it makes it just about even!
WH
Come to think of it we, Christians, could also take the responsibility
for DUI seeing as Jesus used to turn water into wine...and I doubt it
was alcohol free wine he was mirakelling 'cos that wasn't even invented
in those days!
And just what ws he driving, to warrant a DUI?
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Compromise about Muhammad |
10 Nov 2005 02:59:11 AM |
|
|
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Inmcf.14115$1L3.562552@news20.bellglobal.com...
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131523192.130137.197420@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
WH skrev:
Right then you lot, lets end this ridiculous discussion about whether
Muhammad was a paedofile or not shall we?
We'll give, to satisfy douglas and Jane, the credit for paedofili to
Muhammad shall we, whilst we'll take responsibility, we Christians
through Adam and Eve, for Incest!
How 'bout that then? Is that fair. I think it makes it just about even!
WH
Come to think of it we, Christians, could also take the responsibility
for DUI seeing as Jesus used to turn water into wine...and I doubt it
was alcohol free wine he was mirakelling 'cos that wasn't even invented
in those days!
And just what ws he driving, to warrant a DUI?
How else was he going to get back, eh? YOu know what it's like at these
wedding receptions and it's hard enough getting a cab in Canae at the best
of times.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Compromise about Muhammad |
09 Nov 2005 03:30:38 PM |
|
|
Jane wrote:
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131523192.130137.197420@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
WH skrev:
Right then you lot, lets end this ridiculous discussion about whether
Muhammad was a paedofile or not shall we?
We'll give, to satisfy douglas and Jane, the credit for paedofili to
Muhammad shall we, whilst we'll take responsibility, we Christians
through Adam and Eve, for Incest!
How 'bout that then? Is that fair. I think it makes it just about even!
WH
Come to think of it we, Christians, could also take the responsibility
for DUI seeing as Jesus used to turn water into wine...and I doubt it
was alcohol free wine he was mirakelling 'cos that wasn't even invented
in those days!
And just what ws he driving, to warrant a DUI?
We don't know what he was actually driving, but the people who partook
thought it was a donkey.
^_^
Woods
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Treat" |
|
| Title: Re: Compromise about Muhammad |
10 Nov 2005 06:31:09 PM |
|
|
Woodswun wrote:
Jane wrote:
And just what ws he driving, to warrant a DUI?
We don't know what he was actually driving, but the people who partook
thought it was a donkey.
So what are you saying, Woods, that Jesus was drunk on his *****?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Compromise about Muhammad |
10 Nov 2005 06:45:35 PM |
|
|
"Uncle Treat" <jflemke@locallink.net> wrote in message
news:1131669069.627349.294440@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Woodswun wrote:
Jane wrote:
And just what ws he driving, to warrant a DUI?
We don't know what he was actually driving, but the people who partook
thought it was a donkey.
So what are you saying, Woods, that Jesus was drunk on his *****?
Hehehe!
Jane
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc" |
|
| Title: Re: Compromise about Muhammad |
12 Nov 2005 03:24:01 AM |
|
|
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OQRcf.17425$1L3.830545@news20.bellglobal.com...
"Uncle Treat" <jflemke@locallink.net> wrote in message
news:1131669069.627349.294440@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Woodswun wrote:
Jane wrote:
And just what ws he driving, to warrant a DUI?
We don't know what he was actually driving, but the people who partook
thought it was a donkey.
So what are you saying, Woods, that Jesus was drunk on his *****?
Hehehe!
Jane
At least you have a good sense of humor, Jane. ;-) That was funny.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Compromise about Muhammad |
11 Nov 2005 10:44:05 PM |
|
|
Uncle Treat wrote:
Woodswun wrote:
Jane wrote:
And just what ws he driving, to warrant a DUI?
We don't know what he was actually driving, but the people who partook
thought it was a donkey.
So what are you saying, Woods, that Jesus was drunk on his *****?
LOL!
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "mondo" |
|
| Title: Re: Compromise about Muhammad |
09 Nov 2005 10:20:31 PM |
|
|
Well Muslims believe in Adam and Eve also, so that's two strikes against
them!!
mondo
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131522517.421064.173430@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Right then you lot, lets end this ridiculous discussion about whether
Muhammad was a paedofile or not shall we?
We'll give, to satisfy douglas and Jane, the credit for paedofili to
Muhammad shall we, whilst we'll take responsibility, we Christians
through Adam and Eve, for Incest!
How 'bout that then? Is that fair. I think it makes it just about even!
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "WH" |
|
| Title: Re: Compromise about Muhammad |
10 Nov 2005 05:12:39 AM |
|
|
mondo wrote:
Well Muslims believe in Adam and Eve also, so that's two strikes against
them!!
mondo
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131522517.421064.173430@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Right then you lot, lets end this ridiculous discussion about whether
Muhammad was a paedofile or not shall we?
We'll give, to satisfy douglas and Jane, the credit for paedofili to
Muhammad shall we, whilst we'll take responsibility, we Christians
through Adam and Eve, for Incest!
How 'bout that then? Is that fair. I think it makes it just about even!
WH
Who put that spanner there :-)
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tugboat Captain" |
|
| Title: Re: Compromise about Muhammad |
10 Nov 2005 03:26:38 PM |
|
|
WH wrote / skrev:
mondo wrote:
Well Muslims believe in Adam and Eve also, so that's two strikes against
them!!
mondo
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131522517.421064.173430@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Right then you lot, lets end this ridiculous discussion about whether
Muhammad was a paedofile or not shall we?
We'll give, to satisfy douglas and Jane, the credit for paedofili to
Muhammad shall we, whilst we'll take responsibility, we Christians
through Adam and Eve, for Incest!
How 'bout that then? Is that fair. I think it makes it just about even!
WH
Who put that spanner there :-)
WH
You are the monkey!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Compromise about Muhammad |
10 Nov 2005 08:48:10 PM |
|
|
WH wrote:
mondo wrote:
Well Muslims believe in Adam and Eve also, so that's two strikes against
them!!
mondo
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131522517.421064.173430@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Right then you lot, lets end this ridiculous discussion about whether
Muhammad was a paedofile or not shall we?
We'll give, to satisfy douglas and Jane, the credit for paedofili to
Muhammad shall we, whilst we'll take responsibility, we Christians
through Adam and Eve, for Incest!
How 'bout that then? Is that fair. I think it makes it just about even!
WH
Who put that spanner there :-)
Good one, rocket scientist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "mondo" |
|
| Title: Re: Compromise about Muhammad |
10 Nov 2005 09:41:29 PM |
|
|
Good one, rocket scientist.
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131677290.289664.138260@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
WH wrote:
mondo wrote:
Well Muslims believe in Adam and Eve also, so that's two strikes
against
them!!
mondo
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131522517.421064.173430@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Right then you lot, lets end this ridiculous discussion about whether
Muhammad was a paedofile or not shall we?
We'll give, to satisfy douglas and Jane, the credit for paedofili to
Muhammad shall we, whilst we'll take responsibility, we Christians
through Adam and Eve, for Incest!
How 'bout that then? Is that fair. I think it makes it just about
even!
WH
Who put that spanner there :-)
begin 666 equation5.gif
M1TE&.#EAD0`M`( ``````/___RP`````D0`M```"_XR/J<OM#Z.<M-J+L]Z\
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LJ6JX+UD^B OU+*+H"(\YC!E.-$[DZ&?019 57>U11M)/+5L)4[I\Z:T``#L`
`
end
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
