Coverup in OKC Bombing case?



 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > Coverup in OKC Bombing case?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: "TonyZ2001"
Date: 02 Feb 2004 07:03:43 AM
Object: Coverup in OKC Bombing case?
OKC BOMBING FALLOUT
Ex-congressman's aide has video of explosion?
Police raid home for evidence Nichols' attorneys say investigators never saw
Posted: February 1, 2004
1:00 a.m. Eastern
This story appears in today's edition of the McCurtain Daily Gazette.
By J.D. Cash
2004 McCurtain Daily Gazette
The Fairfax County, Va., home of John Culbertson – once a member of former
U.S. Rep. James Traficant's scandal-plagued congressional office – was raided
Friday afternoon by Oklahoma City police detectives searching for evidence
related to the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.
A copy of the search warrant obtained by the McCurtain Daily Gazette described
the evidence sought by detectives as including any and all computer equipment,
letters, correspondence, electronic mail and image files.
The raid follows a Jan. 27 closed-door meeting attended by prosecutors and
defense attorneys involved with the Terry Nichols murder trial, set to begin
one month from now in Oklahoma.
During the meeting, it was brought to the attention of prosecutors Culbertson
could have critical evidence concerning the bombing – evidence that had not
come to the attention of state or federal prosecutors.
According to the affidavit filed with the search warrant, Nichols' defense
attorneys filed a motion under seal with the court and further advised
prosecutors Culbertson ''may have possession of a video and/or still
photographs of a Ryder truck parked in front of the Alfred P. Murrah building
before the explosion and during the explosion.''
The affidavit also indicates Nichols' defense attorneys said they attempted to
contact Culbertson and he was not cooperative in showing them the possible
evidence.
The motion presented by defense attorneys also stated Dallas, Texas, attorney
Thomas W. Mills Jr. observed and described a video and still photos that
Culbertson showed him.
Oklahoma City police detective Mark R. Easley interviewed Mills at his law
office after District Judge Steven Taylor recommended an investigation into the
matter.
Mills said he had gone to Washington, D.C., years ago to meet with Culbertson
and actually viewed the video on Aug. 26, 1998.
Mills specifically told police detectives he saw a portion of a video and
possibly three still pictures that were stored on Culbertson’s laptop
computer.
In an affidavit obtained by this newspaper, Detective Easley said Mills told
him the images he was shown included the Murrah building in ''pristine
condition.''
Mills then said, ''Mr. Culbertson pushed a button and a second photograph came
up with a small glow at the bottom of the building. Mr. Culbertson pushed
another button and another frame appeared of a ball of fire rising from the
building and the building fell.
''Mr. Mills asked where the video and pictures came from (and) Mr. Culbertson
said it came from an ATF agent.''
In the motion filed by Nichols’ defense earlier, attorney Mark Earnest
explained he interviewed both Mills and Culbertson about the potential
evidence. He said Culbertson told him his request for a copy of the video and
photographs ''placed Culbertson in a tight spot.''
When contacted by telephone late last week, Culbertson told an Oklahoma City
police detective he had turned over a copy of the evidence to the House
Judiciary Committee several years ago. Asked if he still had a copy of the
material, Culbertson was described as evasive – refusing to divulge that
information.
Appearing July 27, 2000, before the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of
Representatives, the record shows Culbertson alluded to the subject of the
possible existence of a videotape of the bomb blast in Oklahoma City.
Speaking as the director of the Center for Reform in Washington, D.C.,
Culbertson told members of the committee: ''With respect to the statements made
by the Department of Justice that there are no photos or videos of the
explosions of the Murrah Building, we have discovered that some indeed exist
and are known to members of the law enforcement community.
''We have a short video presentation with a federal police officer describing a
surveillance tape he personally witnessed at a gathering of law enforcement
officers and comparing it to similar photos we have obtained in the Oklahoma
City investigation, which will be presented after this opening statement, with
your consent, Mr. Chairman. It is about two minutes long.
''This is a video taken April 13 of this year. It is a federal police officer
describing a surveillance tape from Oklahoma City he personally witnessed and
comparing it to other photos we have uncovered.''
During his appearance before the House Committee, Culbertson filed an affidavit
containing statements he says were made by a federal agent who, Culbertson
claimed, told him he was present at a training seminar after the bombing when
the videotape was alleged to have been shown to several federal agents.
The statement included in the official record of the hearing is as follows:
''The federal police officer described two distinct explosions the locations of
which are consistent with evidence uncovered in the course of investigating the
attack on the Murrah Federal Building. The federal police officer also stated
that the photos and video frames recovered as described above are consistent
with the surveillance video that he witnessed in the training seminar. The
officer’s statement as well as photos obtained in the investigation is
contained in this document.''
Culbertson went on to testify: ''The Department of Justice has deprived the
public of this important information as well as the courts in various
jurisdictions charged with trying cases related to the bombing. This act is
nothing short of callous and malicious obstruction of justice in what many
might consider one of the most important cases of the 20th century.''
However, under direct examination by a member of the committee, Culbertson
admitted he did not have possession of the film.
The transcript of the hearing contains this exchange between Culbertson and
Rep. Jerrold Nadler of New York:
NADLER: Have you seen it?
CULBERTSON: I actually conducted the interview in Mr. Traficant’s office.
NADLER: Have you seen the tape, I asked.
CULBERTSON: The surveillance tape?
NADLER: No. You have not seen the surveillance tape. Do you have it with you
today?
CULBERTSON: The videotape?
NADLER: No, the surveillance tape.
CULBERTSON: No.
NADLER: So this is a tape of an officer talking about a different tape that we
cannot see?
CULBERTSON: We are attempting to get this tape. This is a tape of a police
officer describing what he saw and comparing it to photographs and videotape
frames that we have in our possession. There are more than one series of
surveillance.
On July 30, 2002, a federal judge sentenced Culbertson's boss, James Traficant,
to eight years in prison and fined him $150,000 after a jury found the Ohio
Democrat guilty on 10 counts of bribery, racketeering and tax evasion.
The guilty verdict led the House to strip Traficant of his seat, making him
only the second member of Congress kicked out since the Civil War. Culbertson
remained on the former congressman's office staff for a short time until
elections could be held to fill the vacancy.
An inventory of the items removed from the Culbertson residence has not been
made public.
.

 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER