Evangelist Luke reports an eclipse of the sun, but is he correct? We
slightly modified the biblical report for the benefit of the
scientifically minded faithful. An eclipse happened at crucifixion
time as reported by the evangelists. The detailed astronomic report of
the eclipse includes biblical comments. http://www.lulu.com/astrology
.
|
|
| User: "Pastor Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion Eclipsed |
23 Jul 2007 08:35:32 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 05:12:46 -0700, Klaudio Zic
<rtrrt@sdf.lonestar.org> spoke thusly:
Evangelist Luke reports an eclipse of the sun, but is he correct? We
slightly modified the biblical report for the benefit of the
scientifically minded faithful. An eclipse happened at crucifixion
time as reported by the evangelists. The detailed astronomic report of
the eclipse includes biblical comments. http://www.lulu.com/astrology
Luke doesn't say it was an eclipse. He said that
the Sun was darkened. There's a difference.
There was a Full Moon at the Passover, which
means that there couldn't have been an eclipse
and it was therefore, a supernatural event,
which furthermore, was seen and shaking felt,
all over the empire, with some destruction.
--
Pastor Dave
When making liars happy in their word games takes
precedence over truth, Christ has been abandoned.
-unknown
Expand and go out into the ocean of your faith.
God doesn't do His deepest work in the shallowest
part of the water.
The world says that seeing is believing.
The Bible says that believing is seeing.
Doctrine is not Scripture.
.
|
|
|
| User: "WH" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion Eclipsed |
24 Jul 2007 11:17:24 AM |
|
|
On 23 Juli, 15:35, Pastor Dave <no...@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 05:12:46 -0700, Klaudio Zic
<rt...@sdf.lonestar.org> spoke thusly:
Evangelist Luke reports an eclipse of the sun, but is he correct? We
slightly modified the biblical report for the benefit of the
scientifically minded faithful. An eclipse happened at crucifixion
time as reported by the evangelists. The detailed astronomic report of
the eclipse includes biblical comments.http://www.lulu.com/astrology
Luke doesn't say it was an eclipse. He said that
the Sun was darkened. There's a difference.
There was a Full Moon at the Passover, which
means that there couldn't have been an eclipse
and it was therefore, a supernatural event,
which furthermore, was seen and shaking felt,
all over the empire, with some destruction.
--
Pastor Dave
When making liars happy in their word games takes
precedence over truth, Christ has been abandoned.
-unknown
Expand and go out into the ocean of your faith.
God doesn't do His deepest work in the shallowest
part of the water.
The world says that seeing is believing.
The Bible says that believing is seeing.
Doctrine is not Scripture.
The big question is not what Luke said...the big question is who gives
a *****?
WH
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Klaudio Zic" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion Eclipsed |
26 Jul 2007 04:36:27 AM |
|
|
On Jul 23, 3:35 pm, Pastor Dave <no...@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 05:12:46 -0700, Klaudio Zic
<rt...@sdf.lonestar.org> spoke thusly:
Evangelist Luke reports an eclipse of the sun, but is he correct? We
slightly modified the biblical report for the benefit of the
scientifically minded faithful. An eclipse happened at crucifixion
time as reported by the evangelists. The detailed astronomic report of
the eclipse includes biblical comments.http://www.lulu.com/astrology
Luke doesn't say it was an eclipse. He said that
the Sun was darkened. There's a difference.
There was a Full Moon at the Passover, which
means that there couldn't have been an eclipse
Three evangeists report that there was darkness lasting three hours.
That appears to be correct.
and it was therefore, a supernatural event,
which furthermore, was seen and shaking felt,
all over the empire, with some destruction.
--
Pastor Dave
When making liars happy in their word games takes
precedence over truth, Christ has been abandoned.
-unknown
Expand and go out into the ocean of your faith.
God doesn't do His deepest work in the shallowest
part of the water.
The world says that seeing is believing.
The Bible says that believing is seeing.
Doctrine is not Scripture.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Klaudio Zic" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion Eclipsed |
26 Jul 2007 04:32:46 AM |
|
|
On Jul 23, 3:35 pm, Pastor Dave <no...@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 05:12:46 -0700, Klaudio Zic
<rt...@sdf.lonestar.org> spoke thusly:
Evangelist Luke reports an eclipse of the sun, but is he correct? We
slightly modified the biblical report for the benefit of the
scientifically minded faithful. An eclipse happened at crucifixion
time as reported by the evangelists. The detailed astronomic report of
the eclipse includes biblical comments.http://www.lulu.com/astrology
Luke doesn't say it was an eclipse. He said that
the Sun was darkened. There's a difference.
There was a Full Moon at the Passover, which
means that there couldn't have been an eclipse
and it was therefore, a supernatural event,
which furthermore, was seen and shaking felt,
all over the empire, with some destruction.
--
Pastor Dave
That is coorect. It seems that the eclipse hapened at sunset which
might have confused the view.
yours in earnest,
Klaudio Zic
When making liars happy in their word games takes
precedence over truth, Christ has been abandoned.
-unknown
Expand and go out into the ocean of your faith.
God doesn't do His deepest work in the shallowest
part of the water.
The world says that seeing is believing.
The Bible says that believing is seeing.
Doctrine is not Scripture.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
