To Vladimir Putin, c/o the Russian Embassy in the United States...
Dear Mr. Putin,
I'm a USAF veteran concerned with the situation in southern Lebanon.
In my opinion, the situation requires drastic measures in order to put
an immediate and permanent stop to the
bloodshed in said region. The U.S. has has neither the will nor the
objectivity necessary in order to deal with the conflict in a helpful
manner.
In order to end the conflict, I'm asking Russia to launch nuclear
missiles at southern Lebanon and Gaza--directly at the Israeli military
forces. I realize that there will be tremendous loss of life and
intense suffering on both sides, but I think it may be the healthiest,
least harmful and most effective solution in the long run. This
immediate surgical strike will give Israel the buffer it wants. It
will stop any mention of missiles being launched by Hezbollah. It will
show both sides the potential consequences of prolonged hatred and
conflict. And I can pretty much
guarantee an immediate and long-lasting cease-fire.
I'm not entirely sure how to go about this. Maybe it would be best to
warn Lebanon and Israel first. "You have such and such amount of time
to vacate the areas of southern Lebanon from this point to this point
or anyone remaining there will be annihilated." Leave it at that, and
see what happens. Then launch the missiles. I could be wrong though.
Maybe a surprise strike would be the only chance of success. I leave
the specifics to you.
I believe that this is what it will take to shock both sides out of
potential destruction inherent in their current levels of racial
hatred. I seriously doubt that Israel will consider retaliation as
Russia could turn the entire nation of Israel into a parking lot.
I'm not asking this from selfish motives. I have nothing to gain. I
don't hold any stock in companies specializing in nuclear clean-up or
disaster aid. I'm asking that you do this
for the good of the world, the good of the Arab Palestinians, and the
survival of Israel. I ask you to show them a glimpse of the inevitable
opposite extreme to peaceful coexistence and cooperation. And I can
offer you no payment for your efforts.
What's in it for you? Well, first, the world will see that you are to
be taken seriously. Second, your wisdom would earn the good will of
the world for saving the lives of potentially hundreds of thousands of
people over the course of the next century even at the cost of many
lives today.
Despite your dislike of our culture, there is an old song by a British
musician named Sting called "Russians" that I think fits the situation.
I believe that if you listen to it, you will agree that both Arab and
Israeli mothers love their children enough never to want this type of
destruction again once they see its potential. Perhaps the powerful
mandala of a well-placed mushroom cloud is their only hope. Bol'shoye
spacibo i zhelayu vam uspekha.
Your pal,
Shasta
.
|
|
| User: "Claude Latremouille" |
|
| Title: Re: Dear Mr. Putin... |
03 Aug 2006 07:36:09 AM |
|
|
*
On 3 Aug 2006 00:05:23 -0700, "" <>
wrote in part:
*
I'm a USAF veteran
*
Another retired pilot? Which explains why you did many a 'hit and
run' on my posts. Here is one of mine, again, to which you never
responded. Enjoy!
*
Subject: Re: Once again, the Chirac non-event
Date: 14 Dec 2003 16:13:29 GMT
Message-ID: <bri279$o6f$1@freenet9.carleton.ca>
*
On 14 Dec 2003 01:41:20 -0800, (Anon Ymous)
wrote about what
*
cj559@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Claude Latremouille) wrote in message
news:<brds1f$1gd$1@freenet9.carleton.ca>...
*
A most informative post, Shastaman, one which has allowed me to
see better where you stand.
*
Therefore, the texts derived from these encyphered quatrains
are... decyphered texts.
As the texts don't have a clear key that would lead to one and only
one possible meaning, they are your interpretations. You choose the
meaning using replaced or added letters. There are other possible
decryptions.
*
Many true facts in the above paragraph. Allow me to distinguish
between what is a fact and what is not necessarily so, although
it could be:
*
As the texts don't have a clear key that would lead to
one and only one possible meaning, they are your
interpretations.
*
True, the encyphering method chosen by Nostradamus does not allow
for only one possible solution. This may be regrettable, but it
is necessary, given the manner (polygraphy) in which he did the
job. Your statement above boils down to stating that polygraphy
does not exist because -- by definition -- it does have more than
one possible solution... that's why it is called polygraphy. I
suggest that you read Trithemius' book on Polygraphy.
*
Not true: because of the above, this does not mean that the texts
I have found are my interpretation. They are what I have found.
Either what I have found is what Nostradamus intended to be
found, in which case what I have found is not an interpretation,
but *is* Nostradamus' prophecy, OR Nostradamus did not intend the
texts I have found to have been found at all, in which case what
I have found is not an interpretation either, it is a pure
invention on my part. So, in either case, the word interpretation
does not belong in this part of the discussion.
*
To clarify further, I would use the word interpretation in the
context of an attempt at explaining what a text means. As the
texts I have found have almost nothing in common with the
published texts themselves (except their letters, of course), I
would never use the word interpretation to speak of what I did to
them. I would (and have) use(d) it in the context of what I did
from 1969 to 1994, i.e., trying to understand the published texts
as they were, and trying to explain them. The decyphering job
happened later.
*
You choose the meaning using replaced or added letters.
*
I would rather say: using the technique of the line-based cryptic
anagram, I find a text which may or may not be a text hidden
previously by the guy who wrote the original text. The word
'meaning' has nothing to do in this part of the discussion. I do
not find a meaning, I find a text.
*
As long as one knows what they are, then it really does not
matter if one is of the view that I am mistaken in my own view
that the originals, which I like to call 'meaningful
gobbledygook', are encyphered texts which ought not be translated
into English.
If you're right, which is still very much in question, then only the
decrypted text could be translated--yes. But you refuse to even
entertain the possibility that you aren't correct!
*
This last statement of yours is false, you had stated it very
recently, I had not responded, but as you insist upon repeating
it, I shall:
*
In this NewsGroup, I have stated dozens of times, even while
responding to earlier statements MADE BY YOU, all equally false,
that the degree of certainty I view the decyphered texts to fall
into is directly proportional to the number of occurrences of an
event being found in these texts.
*
For example, an event found only once (I shall give shortly an
example of same, as it is about to become incorrect... and it is
not the first time I do so here, despite your false statement
above) does not have a very high degree of certainty. If I have
published it, it is because *I* -- not being a seer/prophet -- do
not know if the event will happen or not, and because the style
of it is consistent with the style of everything else I have
found. If it turns out to be incorrect (and it most probably
shall, given current events), you will have yet another example
(after the Chirac non-event, or the Aegean Sea non-event) of a
decyphered text which is either in whole or in part incorrect.
*
Your repeated statements that I 'refuse to even entertain the
possibility that [I am not] correct!' are therefore very false.
*
Your other statement -- not repeated here -- that I tend to
insult people who disagree with what I write is also misleading.
I tend to -- and I do -- insult those who insult me. In the past,
you have insulted me, and I have responded in kind. Clear?! Back
to your post:
*
A very long time ago, a regular poster to this NewsGroup stated
that -- if ever, a future event were to confirm these anagrams,
this would not be proof that Nostradamus encyphered his texts,
but would be evidence that the person who posted these anagrams
is himself a seer/prophet in his own right.
It wouldnt be proof of any such thing.
*
I agree. But the statement was not made by me, so I don't have to
defend it.
*
A single future event among a
sea of failures would be a lucky guess. For intstance, if you
decrypted one and found "war in the middle east"--well heck that would
be a shocker!
*
Understood. But using X-72 (a decyphered version, that is) to
announce that the Queen Mother shall survive the total eclipse of
the Sun of August 11, 1999, might not be a shocker, but might
turn out to be true (in fact, it did come true). So, is it a
lucky guess? Given your example above, it would appear so. Jean
Guernon stated that it is a lucky guess and therefore does not
count it as a hit. (He has a dozen books to defend, all of which
do not mention that Nostradamus' texts are encyphered.)
*
Using all the decyphered texts about the Chirac (so far non-)
event, one was able to predict, on December 26, 2001, that he
would be re-elected President in 2002 (a prediction made when he
was 50/50 in the opinion polls against Jospin), because the only
way the decyphered texts could become true was for him to be
President on a future December 26. So, he *had to be* re-elected
in 2002 (he was). So, is it another lucky guess? Given your
example above, it would appear so.
*
In fact, NOTHING can qualify as a hit, given your example above.
If it is a likely event, like Ben Laden being killed by the US,
it shall not count as a hit, because it is likely. Paris being
destroyed by the US military, by mistake, is unlikely. So, rather
than calling it a possible future hit, some prefer to call it an
invention on my part.
*
Therefore, even in
that hypothesis, a correctly decyphered text respecting a future
event would not qualify as a confirmation of the encyphered
nature of Nostradamus' published texts.
True. You'd need a long string of definite hits on future events,
IMHO.
*
Sorry to disappoint you, O Anonymous One, but you shall not get a
long string of definite hits on future events, given your example
above. In fact, you shall not get a single hit, given your
example above. Everything can be explained away, a lucky guess.
the decryptor being a seer/prophet himself, etc. Every
explanation, except the simplest one: the texts are encyphered,
will make sure of that.
*
And I note that you have added a new condition to the test you
were proposing (just like Randi, as a matter of fact): not only
will you not accept a definite hit, but you will only accept A
LONG LIST of definite hits, thus making certain that the
condition of your test shall never be met. (That's how Randi can
keep his million dollars). That is also how the so-called
sceptics [in fact a bunch of intellectual frauds] attacked Michel
Gauquelin's findings (about astrology) while claiming to test
them. When they found that his findings were true, they added new
conditions (which the test made certain would never be met) to
make the test fail. And it did fail. So they won because they
were crooks.
*
And some people who have argued here that these anagrams cannot
possibly concern future events, have not yet explained why the
circumstances of the unintended destruction of Paris, on Sunday,
August 13, 2017, at 3:53 a.m., were found in over 500 decyphered
quatrains.
Im not one of those people, [...]
*
I know. That stupidity was utterred by a [yet another anonymous]
British military moron.
*
but one possibility is that you want to
find evidence of that attack.
*
What attack? See, you have even forgotten that -- prior to the
end of 1994, I had no idea of the existence of that prophecy. So
why would I want to find evidence of something I do not even know
about? Beats me.
*
How hard could it be, given your rules
for line-anagrams, to find Paris and nuke?
*
You call them MY rules. Why do you call them MY rules? Why should
I answer a loaded question like this one? And why don't you first
read the goddammed prophecy and then start to pontificate about
it? And why don't you find the Paris prophecy in the US
Declaration of Independence (at least you can read THAT), if it
is so easy to find?
*
Either the anagrams cannot refer to the future, or they can. If
they do, then...
They either do or they don't. Just because they can, doesn't mean
they must refer to the future.
S~
*
The British military moron who had uttered the comment above was
saying that the line-based cryptic anagrams could not refer to
the future, and was saying at the same time that the line-based
cryptic anagrams which referred to the unintended destruction of
Paris by the US military on Sunday, August 13, 2017, at 3:53
a.m., was an invention on my part, which is why I call him a
moron (either it can refer to the future or it can't). And which
is why I have used in my reply to you above his contradictory
statements (to which YOU have not objected in this NewsGroup,
while you have objected to my posts).
*
So I would say that, like Saddam, you have some serious cleaning
up to do if you want your statements to be taken seriously.
*
[Editor's Note: The above was posted when Saddam Hussein was
discovered hiding in a hole, with a rather discheveled, dirty,
appearance.]
*
Have a nice day, folks!
*
Claude Latrémouille
August 3, 2006
http://web.ncf.ca/cj559
*
=== ===
=== CLAUDE LATRÉMOUILLE ===
===========================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Dear Mr. Putin... |
03 Aug 2006 10:05:43 AM |
|
|
Claude Latremouille wrote so much...oh so very much.
God but that was boring...trying to wade through your conjectural
rubbish.
Claude, you remind me of the last 'diehard' member of the 'Flat Earth'
Society, vehemently defending his life-long pet theory.
Codes, secrets of the Ancients, flying saucers, Seers.
Charletans more like.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Dear Mr. Putin... |
03 Aug 2006 11:26:01 AM |
|
|
"Werewolfy" <thegrimreaper10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1154617543.878179.188610@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Claude Latremouille wrote so much...oh so very much.
Yeah he has a big mouth and a big ego, nasty combination for one as
conceited as he is.
God but that was boring...trying to wade through your conjectural
rubbish.
You're obviously not a believer in fraude's anagrams, the ones that tell such
stunning detail about past history even to the point that fraude can claim
to tell what Nostradamus was thinking, yet when questioned on details of
the event he claims they all point to he always avoids answering, strange eh?
Claude, you remind me of the last 'diehard' member of the 'Flat Earth'
Society, vehemently defending his life-long pet theory.
his anagrams also reflect his own ignorance, such as Cyprus being a British island
in 2012 when it supposed to be "clobbered" by Turkish forces, (incidentally an
interesting word "clobbered" apparently used by Nostradamus even though its
earliest appearance as a noun was sometime in the late 18th C and meant personal
equipment, clothes etc. Yet fraude says nostradamus used it as its current verb meaning
even though the earliest record of that is in the 1940's or so), this apparently happens
when the Aegean Sea gets nuked by a "foolish Russian sub" apparently.
Worth noting that fraude already claimed this event would happen at a much earlier date
but as that passed with no such happening he... revisited... his anagrams and found a later,
more convenient date in 2012 ;0)
Codes, secrets of the Ancients, flying saucers, Seers.
fraude's anagrams show his ignorance of how nuclear release authority is obtained, how
such weapons are programmed, aimed and fired too but he's never let a fact stand in the
way of his yarns yet and, no doubt, when Mr Chirac leaves the Presidency alive and the
Aegean Sea is not nuked in 2012 he'll revisit his revisitings and find something else
he managed to miss again so he can date them again ;0)
Charletans more like.
Surprising how many anagrams those three words give...
http://wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=Charletans+more+like
No surprise that idiots like fraude can find anything they want in a massive amount
of work like Nostradamus' especially when you have the added gift of playing with
some of the letters and making words up as he does. It also helps that he has the whole
of history, even the parts he displays his ignorance in, to fit his anagrams to, which is
why he ALWAYS fails when asked for some inconsequential details about the even he
claims they're about... such as the name of the Russian sub that nukes the Aegean,
the type of sub, the Captains name, the name of the American that nukes Paris etc etc
all detail he seems unable to supply... not surprisingly ;0)
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "Claude Latremouille" |
|
| Title: Re: Dear Mr. Putin... |
03 Aug 2006 04:09:08 PM |
|
|
*
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:26:01 GMT, "Krib" <kribuk@gmail.com>
one of the great military minds of this era wrote about what
*
"Werewolfy" <thegrimreaper10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1154617543.878179.188610@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Claude Latremouille wrote so much...oh so very much.
Yeah he has a big mouth and a big ego, nasty combination for one as
conceited as he is.
*
And to demonstrate the above, this super British military brain,
discussing the issue of Nostradamus' encyphered texts, came up
with the following:
*
"Claude Latremouille" <cj559@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote in message
news:aa1fjt$re4$1@freenet9.carleton.ca...
1. There is nothing to decrypt.
2. There is something to decrypt but the method used is wrong.
3. There is something to decrypt, the method is correct, but the
method is sometimes incorrectly applied.
And I ended my post asking you all the same question: Why is it
that you never discuss the third possibility?
Because I don't see any difference between points 2 & 3.
*
So, if you want to understand why in 1960 the British military
lost almost completely a Mediterranean island to... a Greek
Archbishop, you have here part of the answer. They are sooo
smart!
*
That's why we, Canadians, had to clean-up after them in 1964.
*
Have a nice day, folks!
*
Claude Latrémouille
August 3, 2006
http://web.ncf.ca/cj559
*
=== ===
=== CLAUDE LATRÉMOUILLE ===
===========================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Dear Mr. Putin... |
04 Aug 2006 03:44:13 AM |
|
|
"Claude Latremouille" <cj559@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote in message
news:eatolk$khk$1@theodyn.ncf.ca...
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:26:01 GMT, "Krib" <kribuk@gmail.com>
one of the great military minds of this era wrote about what
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Your fairy tale anagrams tell you that too fraude? Can I expect you
to revisit that anytime soon?
Yeah he has a big mouth and a big ego, nasty combination for one as
conceited as he is.
And to demonstrate the above,
You don't like your big head and big mouth being mentioned do you fraude?
Why is that? are you a tad sensitive that YOUR anagrams reflect your own
prejudices and ignorance rather than the fairy tale you want them to?
this super British military brain,
^^^^^^^^
Ooops still not very bright are you fraude ;0)
discussing the issue of Nostradamus' encyphered texts, came up
with the following:
So, if you want to understand why in 1960 the British military
lost almost completely a Mediterranean island to... a Greek
Archbishop, you have here part of the answer. They are sooo
smart!
Yet you're the pretentious fraud, (hey looks like fraude must be an anagram!)
who claims that YOUR anagram said that Cyprus would be British in 2012, it
seems you're putting your ignorance into Nostradamus' words.
I recall your pathetic attempts at backpeddling to try to explain YOUR
mistake in YOUR anagrams but you do what you always do at such times, bluster,
***** then run away. You share that condition with all of the pretenders and
other lame wannabe's in here.
That's why we, Canadians, had to clean-up after them in 1964.
What's that fraude? still running away from the questions YOUR anagrams can't
answer? questions like...
"fraude's anagrams, the ones that tell such stunning detail about past history even
to the point that fraude can claim to tell what Nostradamus was thinking, yet when
questioned on details of the event he claims they all point to he always avoids answering"
Well no surprise there it's yet another trait that you and every other swollen headed liar
like you has in common, the inability to actually prove your fairy tales unless such proof
relates to past events.
That's why the Aegean Sea event never happened and you had to redate it to a much
later period, when it fails next time you'll do the same just like you will on all the other
***** YOUR anagrams depict.
That's why you can relate such intricate minutae about historical events because you can
tune YOUR anagrams to fit and any strangeness can be explained away with made up words,
and how "Nostradamus thought" yet you're unable to give anything but the barest statements
about the events YOU claim YOUR anagrams depict for the future.
Still you're about par with the other flakes and liars in here so at least you're in
good company eh fraude ;0)
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "Claude Latremouille" |
|
| Title: Re: Dear Mr. Putin... |
04 Aug 2006 11:28:15 AM |
|
|
*
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 08:44:13 GMT, "Krib" <kribuk@gmailREMOVECAPS.com>
wrote in part:
*
Yet you're the pretentious fraud, (hey looks like fraude must be an anagram!)
who claims that YOUR anagram said that Cyprus would be British in 2012, it
seems you're putting your ignorance into Nostradamus' words.
I recall your pathetic attempts at backpeddling to try to explain YOUR
mistake in YOUR anagrams
*
Funny how memory plays tricks on people, especially those who are
hired to kill Irishmen and Arabs.
*
For those who might be interested in seeing how the devious
British military mind works, here is a summary of it.
*
Once upon a time, while decyphering Nostradamus' quatrains, I
came upon one which, once decyphered spoke of the British Island
of Cyprus. Funny, said I to myself, everybody knows that Cyprus
has been a sovereign state since 1960, how can Nostradamus be
sooo ill-informed to speak of a British Island?
*
For those who might have missed this exchange, here is the
original quatrain once again, followed by the decyphered text:
*
--------------- C E N T V R I E___S E C O N D E. -------------
----------------------- (édition de 1555) --------------------
*
---- 22 - Le camp Asop d'Eurotte partira, --------------------
--------- S'adioignant proche de lisle submergée: ------------
--------- D'Arton classe phalange pliera, --------------------
--------- No[m]bril du monde plus gra[n]d voix subrogée. -----
*
And the decyphered text:
*
---- 22 - L'OTAN ne pourra pas partir de ---------------------
--------- l'isle Britannique de Chypre, assommée -------------
--------- par la phalange des Turcs en l'An ------------------
--------- XII, quand vng fol Russe bombarde la Mer Égée. -----
*
Which I had the misfortune of translating into modern English for
the ignoramuses of this NewsGroup, including this British
military moron: 'NATO shall be unable to leave the British
island of Cyprus, clobbered in Year XII by the phalanx of the
Turks, when a foolish Russian bombards the Aegean Sea.'
*
That, in itself, was quite a mouthful, as Nostradamus was linking
the fate of Cyprus to that of the Aegean Sea, nuked by mistake on
March 11, 2012.
*
But the resident ignoramus was not amused. After all, if the good
Nostradamus was predicting what was going to happen to the Aegean
Sea and to Cyprus, might he not be right in predicting what was
to happen to Paris?
*
So, he began his attack, hiding of course behind his anonymity,
as he is much too chicken to come out into the open. Typical of
the British, though.
*
First salvo: BOOM! Nostradamus did not speak of anything British
(Britannique) in his original texts. No? Really?
*
PROPHECIES ---------------------------------------------C--Q--L
*
V E R S Aquitaine par insults Britanniques, 02 01 1
Sept foys changer verrés gent Britannique 03 57 1
La saeur aisnee de l'isle Britannique, 04 96 1
Ou est le chef de l'isle britannique: 05 34 2
Qua[n]t Rome aura le chef vieux Britanique. 05 99 4
Nor neigre & Dace,& l'isle Britanique, 06 07 1
Par ceulx de Frise & l'isle Britannique, 06 41 2
Prendre les armes & le nom Britanique 08 58 2
L'isle Britanne par vin,sel en solcy, 10 07 3
Le ieune nay au regne Britannique, 10 40 1
*
ALMANACHS -----------------------------------------YEAR-MONTH-L
*
L'Occident libre les isles Britanniques 1561 SEPT 1
*
But that was not enough for that anonymous ignoramus. BOOM!
Second salvo. Perhaps Nostradamus did indeed use words like
"Britannique" in his original texts, but he most certainly could
not have used "Britannique" to designate a British island like
Cyprus which, after all, is not British, if you get the drift.
*
Forgetting for a moment that we are dealing with a prophecy
published in 1555, we must therefore ask ourselves if Cyprus was
indeed British at any time *since* Nostradamus' death. After all,
to be a prophecy, it must refer to a period of time following its
first printing, and preferably after the author's death. And we
do indeed find that Cyprus was granted independence in 1960 by...
Britain! Clever, eh, this Nostradamus?! Not in your life time!
*
Because Cyprus is no longer British (even though it is still part
of the British Commonwealth), that does not count! Why? Because
countries like Canada are also part of the British Commonwealth
and are not British, not to mention that they are not islands
either, but that does not count either.
*
Funny, though, that I do remember Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth
II's visit to Ottawa, in April 1982, where she signed into Law
the Proclamation of an amendment to Canada's Constitution adopted
earlier at Westminster by the British Parliament, an Act called
The Canada Act. Hehe... Canada's Constitution is a British Act.
Canada is by definition British. On top of being also a member of
the British Commonwealth. (And I seem to recall another visit by
the same Queen to Australia, upon the celebration of her Golden
Jubilee, but that -- I suppose -- does not count either.)
*
So, what does our resident ignoramus do? Admit that Cyprus was
indeed British and is still a member of the British Commonwealth
and, at latest news was still... an island? No way, José. We get
his usual tirade about... the anagrams. Whose anagrams? That is
the question. Here they are again:
*
---- 22 - L'OTAN ne pourra pas partir de ---------------------
--------- l'isle Britannique de Chypre, assommée -------------
--------- par la phalange des Turcs en l'An ------------------
--------- XII, quand vng fol Russe bombarde la Mer Égée. -----
*
What do they say, roughly, in modern English? 'NATO shall be
unable to leave the British island of Cyprus, clobbered in Year
XII by the phalanx of the Turks, when a foolish Russian bombards
the Aegean Sea.'
*
Boy! Aren't we getting our money's worth in this decyphered text?
Two events, one depending on the other, both events occurring in
2012. The first, an unintended nuking of the Aegean Sea by a
drunken Russian submarine commander cruising the Black Sea and
intending to hit Riga, capital of Latvia, on March 11, 2012. The
second, an opportunistic attack by Turkey, finishing the job
started in the 20th century of invading the entire island of
Cyprus, in retaliation for the bungled attempt by Greece of
annexing Cyprus and make it... a Greek island!
*
So, what does our resident ignoramus do?
*
BOOM! Third salvo. He repeats his belief that these anagrams are
not by Nostradamus but are by the one who discovered them, are
his total invention, as our resident ignoramus seems to be able
to predict the future and to predict that these two events shall
not happen.
*
Unfortunately, as I am not a seer/prophet, I cannot make such a
prediction and can only publish what I have found, leaving time
to tell if what I have found is indeed a correct prediction of
these two events apparently occurring in 2012. That is the best I
can do.
*
And why did Nostradamus warn us of the March 11, 2012, event?
Because he uses it as precursor to the unintended nuking of
Paris, on August 13, 2017, at 3:53 a.m., when France's capital
city is also nuked by mistake instead of Beijing, this time... by
the US military!
*
Clever, eh, this Nostradamus?!
*
And our resident ignoramus had to swallow the fact that [BOOM!] a
portion of Cyprus -- the Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and of
Dhekelia -- is still in the hands of Britain. By the same token.
the presence in Cyprus of NATO [BOOM!] -- of which Britain is a
founding member -- is also a fact. Cyprus itself being a member
of the British Commonwealth [BOOM!] ever since her independence
in 1960, and having been British in some form or another from
1878 to 1960 [BOOM!], it should come as no surprise that
Nostradamus calls her... British. [BANG!]
*
But this does not count either. You see, if reality starts to
confirm texts whose discoverer originally thought were
historically true, but not currently true, well, is this not a
confirmation that the discoverer of these texts is not the author
of these texts? Naaa! Too complicated for a simple British
military mind.
*
So this is, in a nutshell, the argument about Cyprus being or not
being British. And this post has nothing to do with Mr. Poutine!
*
Have a nice day, folks!
*
Claude Latrémouille
August 4, 2006
http://web.ncf.ca/cj559
*
=== ===
=== CLAUDE LATRÉMOUILLE ===
===========================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Dear Mr. Putin... |
04 Aug 2006 01:55:38 PM |
|
|
"Claude Latremouille" <cj559@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote in message
news:eavsiv$sru$1@theodyn.ncf.ca...
I recall your pathetic attempts at backpeddling to try to explain YOUR
mistake in YOUR anagrams
*
Funny how memory plays tricks on people, especially those who are
hired to kill Irishmen and Arabs.
Not just them fraude ;0)
For those who might be interested in seeing how the devious
British military mind works, here is a summary of it.
You seem to have a burr up your ancient, withered arse about the military,
why's that old timer weren't you up to serving your country? I guess being
a moronic union rep was enough to tax even your small intellect.
Once upon a time, while decyphering Nostradamus' quatrains,
Ya see... you're telling porkies already, what you do fraudey is make up
anagrams from his words to fit historical events, Nosty supplies nothing
but the words, you supply all the ***** and fairytales.
I came upon one which, once decyphered spoke of the British Island
of Cyprus. Funny, said I to myself, everybody knows that Cyprus
has been a sovereign state since 1960,
Yes... that IS funny.
how can Nostradamus be sooo ill-informed to speak of a British Island?
Well the answer's obvious fraudey, he's not the ignorant one you are, they're
YOUR anagrams and YOU make them fit which is why they reflect YOUR
ignorance and YOUR little prejudices ;0)
Which I had the misfortune of translating into modern English for
the ignoramuses of this NewsGroup,
I don't recall asking you to translate this fraudey, no point is there as you're
not even French and the bastardised version of French you speak is only a
local variant of the real language.
including this British military moron:
Oops there's your little prejudice raising its ugly head again ;0)
'NATO shall be unable to leave the British
island of Cyprus, clobbered in Year XII by the phalanx of the
Turks, when a foolish Russian bombards the Aegean Sea.'
*
That, in itself, was quite a mouthful, as Nostradamus was linking
the fate of Cyprus to that of the Aegean Sea, nuked by mistake on
March 11, 2012.
According to you, there you are again though deciding how, what, when and why
Nosty speaks YOUR fairytales, amazing how YOU can know how he thought and
the reasoninging behind it.
But the resident ignoramus was not amused.
Well untrue, you definitely are amusing as is your constant backpeddling when YOUR
errors in YOUR anagrams are pointed out, not to mention the tremendously lengthy
posts you need to make when you revisit YOUR anagrams and change them again ;0)
After all, if the good Nostradamus was predicting what was going to happen to the Aegean
Sea and to Cyprus, might he not be right in predicting what was to happen to Paris?
Problem is, of course, that Nosty has not predicted any such thing, these are YOUR
fairytales dreamed up for whatever reason an ignoramus like you needs for diplaying
your hubris. As you've pointed out before, and I agree completely, you're not a prophet
so when YOUR anagrams fail, (Aegean Sea anyone?), you swiftly correct them and you'll
do so again when each of your proffered fairytales fails to occur.
So, he began his attack, hiding of course behind his anonymity,
as he is much too chicken to come out into the open. Typical of
the British, though.
You carp on about anonymity often, (you whine at bud for the same thing), why
is that fraude? do you have any particular objection or is it just another pathetic
trait you display.
<SNIP lot's of irrelevant garbage from the senile wanker>
Damn but you do drone on and on about the ***** you dribble in here don't you.
Let's see... yes I said Nosty never used the term for Britain but accepted I was
wrong when you pointed it out to me, why go over that again? because it's all
you can do rather than answer the actual questions I've asked you lots of times.
BOOM! Third salvo. He repeats his belief that these anagrams are
not by Nostradamus but are by the one who discovered them,
Yes that's my contention, you make them fit because they're yours.
as our resident ignoramus seems to be able to predict the future and
to predict that these two events shall not happen.
That's your idea of logic is it fraudey? no wonder such copious amounts of *****
pour out of that excuse of a mind of yours.
Unfortunately, as I am not a seer/prophet, I cannot make such a
prediction and can only publish what I have found, leaving time
to tell if what I have found is indeed a correct prediction of
these two events apparently occurring in 2012. That is the best I
can do.
blah blah you're nothing but a big head with a fat mouth but you
can't resist yakking about YOUR fairytales can you ;0)
And why did Nostradamus warn us of the March 11, 2012, event?
Because he uses it as precursor to the unintended nuking of
Paris, on August 13, 2017, at 3:53 a.m., when France's capital
city is also nuked by mistake instead of Beijing, this time... by
the US military!
So that being the case... let's see if you can supply the intricate details YOUR
anagrams contain of historical events in these future events YOU say will happen.
After all if Nosty encrypted them they must surely have more than just the
crap in the above paragraph, no?
Who is the infamous American that unintenionally nukes Paris, what's the type
and yield of the device? how is it delivered? where is the device fired from?
I recall you claim a Kennedy will be the US President then, which Kennedy?
As for YOUR claim about the Aegean Sea, What type of sub is it? what is
its name? what's the name of the captain? what type of device, yield is it?
where, exactly, is it delivered?
Clever, eh, this Nostradamus?!
If only he was as clever as you like to think you are eh fraude?
And our resident ignoramus had to swallow the fact that [BOOM!] a
portion of Cyprus -- the Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and of
Dhekelia -- is still in the hands of Britain. By the same token.
the presence in Cyprus of NATO [BOOM!] -- of which Britain is a
founding member -- is also a fact. Cyprus itself being a member
of the British Commonwealth [BOOM!] ever since her independence
in 1960, and having been British in some form or another from
1878 to 1960 [BOOM!], it should come as no surprise that
Nostradamus calls her... British. [BANG!]
Says you, now that you can obviously tell exactly what Nostradamus was
thinking the details asked for above should be simple enough for you to
discern, unless of course YOUR anagrams only work on past events eh?
But this does not count either. You see, if reality starts to
confirm texts whose discoverer originally thought were
historically true, but not currently true, well, is this not a
confirmation that the discoverer of these texts is not the author
of these texts? Naaa! Too complicated for a simple British
military mind.
LOL no wonder you had to retire ;0)
So this is, in a nutshell, the argument about Cyprus being or not
being British. And this post has nothing to do with Mr. Poutine!
The point is it's not British and won't be in 2012 which is what YOUR
anagrams said. Never mind all the specious reasoning YOU claim is how
Nosty thinks, that's just the ramblings of an inconsequential liar who
can't bear to think the ***** he makes up is as useless as he is ;0)
Can't wait to see what fairytales you make up to avoid supplying some
details old timer ;0)
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Hey Miller your Moron |
06 Aug 2006 01:47:30 AM |
|
|
"Krib" <kribuk@gmailREMOVECAPS.com> wrote in message news:KKMAg.353$BI6.233@newsfe2-win.ntli.net...
Earlier to Wolfy I said...
"fraude can claim to tell what Nostradamus was thinking, yet when questioned
on details of the event he claims they all point to he always avoids answering,
strange eh?"
Then to that liar fraude I said...
"but you do what you always do at such times, bluster, ***** then run away.
You share that condition with all of the pretenders and other lame wannabe's
in here."
Meaning you and some other gutless, lying twats of course.
As fraude has done his usual scurrying back under his rock rather
than answer the questions his anagrams can't supply it looks like I'm
again better at this 'prophecy' ***** than you miller ;0)
Hey what is it about you frauds that you never have the guts to
face your failures eh?
--
krib
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "=?utf-8?B?VGhlIEFsbCBOZXcgRXhjbHVzaXZlIEZhbnRhc21hZ29yaWNhbGx5IFNwbGVuZGlmZXJvdXNseSBUcnVseSBXb25kcm91cyBNZWwgR2lic29uIEZhbiBDbHViLsK3OirCqMKoKjrCty4g4pmlwqnCruKEog==?=" |
|
| Title: Re: Dear Mr. Putin... |
04 Aug 2006 11:01:37 PM |
|
|
wrote:
To Vladimir Putin, c/o the Russian Embassy in the United States...
Dear Mr. Putin,
I'm a USAF veteran concerned with the situation in southern Lebanon.
In my opinion, the situation requires drastic measures in order to put
an immediate and permanent stop to the
bloodshed in said region. The U.S. has has neither the will nor the
objectivity necessary in order to deal with the conflict in a helpful
manner.
In order to end the conflict, I'm asking Russia to launch nuclear
missiles at southern Lebanon and Gaza--directly at the Israeli military
forces. I realize that there will be tremendous loss of life and
intense suffering on both sides, but I think it may be the healthiest,
least harmful and most effective solution in the long run. This
immediate surgical strike will give Israel the buffer it wants. It
will stop any mention of missiles being launched by Hezbollah. It will
show both sides the potential consequences of prolonged hatred and
conflict. And I can pretty much
guarantee an immediate and long-lasting cease-fire.
I'm not entirely sure how to go about this. Maybe it would be best to
warn Lebanon and Israel first. "You have such and such amount of time
to vacate the areas of southern Lebanon from this point to this point
or anyone remaining there will be annihilated." Leave it at that, and
see what happens. Then launch the missiles. I could be wrong though.
Maybe a surprise strike would be the only chance of success. I leave
the specifics to you.
I believe that this is what it will take to shock both sides out of
potential destruction inherent in their current levels of racial
hatred. I seriously doubt that Israel will consider retaliation as
Russia could turn the entire nation of Israel into a parking lot.
I'm not asking this from selfish motives. I have nothing to gain. I
don't hold any stock in companies specializing in nuclear clean-up or
disaster aid. I'm asking that you do this
for the good of the world, the good of the Arab Palestinians, and the
survival of Israel. I ask you to show them a glimpse of the inevitable
opposite extreme to peaceful coexistence and cooperation. And I can
offer you no payment for your efforts.
What's in it for you? Well, first, the world will see that you are to
be taken seriously. Second, your wisdom would earn the good will of
the world for saving the lives of potentially hundreds of thousands of
people over the course of the next century even at the cost of many
lives today.
Despite your dislike of our culture, there is an old song by a British
musician named Sting called "Russians" that I think fits the situation.
I believe that if you listen to it, you will agree that both Arab and
Israeli mothers love their children enough never to want this type of
destruction again once they see its potential. Perhaps the powerful
mandala of a well-placed mushroom cloud is their only hope. Bol'shoye
spacibo i zhelayu vam uspekha.
Your pal,
Shasta
Good post, Shasta dude !!!!
yeppers, yes siree yes indeedy deedy do !!!!
It would certainly turn into a "Spacibo horrorshow|" if
the jew would dare attack Syria or Iran.....
In the form of SS-N22's raining down on Tel-Aviv, Haifa,
& Dimona -- courtesy of mother Russia.....
For Frick's sake, peoplez, we live in the frickin' 21st Century
-- a Century that should be totally **|FREE|** of world-wide
conflagrations, yet the Seppos & the Kikes seem to want to start
more of them.....
*PEACE* **NOW** or we will all be living in pieces tomorrow,
as World War III will surely break out, if this insidious war is
allowed
to continue much longer.....
HOOROO
UNCLE WALLY
----0-----
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?utf-8?B?VGhlIEFsbCBOZXcgRXhjbHVzaXZlIEZhbnRhc21hZ29yaWNhbGx5IFNwbGVuZGlmZXJvdXNseSBUcnVseSBXb25kcm91cyBNZWwgR2lic29uIEZhbiBDbHViLsK3OirCqMKoKjrCty4g4pmlwqnCruKEog==?=" |
|
| Title: Re: Dear Mr. Putin... |
04 Aug 2006 11:43:11 PM |
|
|
http://www.vialls.com/myahudi/sunburn.html
hooroo
uncle wally
----0----
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Dear Mr. Putin... |
07 Aug 2006 06:35:20 PM |
|
|
The All New Exclusive Fantasmagorically Splendiferously Truly Wondrous
Mel Gibson Fan Club.=C2=B7:*=C2=A8=C2=A8*:=C2=B7. =E2=99=A5=C2=A9=C2=AE=E2=
=84=A2 wrote:
http://www.vialls.com/myahudi/sunburn.html
hooroo
uncle wally
----0----
From the goi, steal the well...*clap*clap*clap*clap*
So our country can be free...*clap*clap*clap*clap*
If he only dies of thirst...*clap*clap*clap*clap*
murder with impunity...*clap*clap*clap*clap*
Rabbi Shasta
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Dear 'kutaman' (aka 'the land surfer')
Well, yeppers, it'z that time of the day once again when your dear old Uncle Wally sez da magickal word:
Dear Friend
Oh well, it'z HOOROO once again to all of my fave peepz from your dear ol' Uncle Wally once again !!!!
=?utf-8?q?oh_well_its_that_time_of_the_day_once_again_for_your_dear_Uncle_Wally_to_say_HOOROO_once_again_to_all_of_his_fave_peepz_out_there_in_APN_land_~!.=C2=B7:*=C2=A8=C2=A8*:=C2=B7.=C2=B7:*=C2=A8=C2=A8*:=C2=B7._=E2=99=A5?=
Dear Diary: How stupid are the heads in the UN?
Dear Friend
=?utf-8?q?Oh_well,_it'z_that_time_of_the_day_once_again_for_your_dear_old_Uncle_Wally,_who_iz_just_your_average,_run-of-the-mill,_friendly_neighborhood_Prophet_of_Doom=E2=84=A2_&_most_excellent_party_dude_extraordinaire_to_say_HOOROO_once_again_to_al
| oh well it'z hooroo and toodle pips to all of my favorite peo;lez from your dear ol' uncle Wally !!!
=?utf-8?q?oH_Well_party_peoplez_in_da_Haus,_it'z_that_time_of_the_day_once_again_for_your_dear_ol'_Uncle_Wally_to_say_the_now_world_famous_HOOROO_to_all_of_his_favorite_peoplez_!!!_so_it'z_Au_revoir,_aufwiedersehen,_aloha,_sayonara,_joy_gin,_da_sweda
Dear fellow Lunatic, Isidore
Dear Dr. Laura
Everything all of my favorite peoplez wanted to know about Oz -- but were afraid to ask their dear old lovable Uncle Wally !!! ;-0 FRICK yeah & HOOROO !!
=?utf-8?q?oH_Well_kids,_it'z_that_time_of_the_day_once_again_for_your_dear_ol'_Uncle_Wally_to_say_the_now_world_famous_HOOROO_to_all_of_his_favorite_peoplez_!!!_so_it'z_Au_revoir,_aufwiedersehen,_aloha,_sayonara,_joy_gin,_da_swedanya,_farval,_ciao_be
Oh dear
|
|
|
