| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"TrUlY WoNdRoUs YeS SiReE YeS InDeEdY Do" |
| Date: |
30 Nov 2004 01:57:53 AM |
| Object: |
EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!??!!??! |
Measurements taken over the past six
weeks seem to indicate a slight increase
in the deviation of the Earth's wobble.
Does anyone else have supporting data?
The deviation from the mean axis was
actually expected to be decreasing at this
time, but the opposite effect seems to be
taking place. The measurements were
collected as part of a geophysical
experiment plotting the position of Polaris
(along with other bodies) relative to two
ground-based reference points. The
amount of the deviation translates into a
shift of ~0.75° from the expected position
based upon projections published two
years ago by the European Space Agency
and re-mapped to the location where the
measurements have been taken over the
past eight months. The error factor for the
mapping can account for no more than
one quarter of the effect noted.
.
|
|
| User: "Barbarossa" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!??!!??! |
30 Nov 2004 10:52:39 PM |
|
|
"TrUlY WoNdRoUs YeS SiReE YeS InDeEdY Do" <trulywondrous2004@yahoo.com.au>
schreef in bericht news:857d0ce0.0411292357.620a877d@posting.google.com...
Measurements taken over the past six
weeks seem to indicate a slight increase
in the deviation of the Earth's wobble.
Does anyone else have supporting data?
The deviation from the mean axis was
actually expected to be decreasing at this
time, but the opposite effect seems to be
taking place. The measurements were
collected as part of a geophysical
experiment plotting the position of Polaris
(along with other bodies) relative to two
ground-based reference points. The
amount of the deviation translates into a
shift of ~0.75° from the expected position
based upon projections published two
years ago by the European Space Agency
and re-mapped to the location where the
measurements have been taken over the
past eight months. The error factor for the
mapping can account for no more than
one quarter of the effect noted.
It would be nice to see the new Northpole somewhere in the area
of the White House in Washington! It would mean much nicer and
warmer weather for The Benelux countries. ;-)
Kind Regards,
Barbarossa
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tadapope" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!??!!??! |
01 Dec 2004 11:38:10 AM |
|
|
In the best interest of the planet Earth I have taken my global gyroscope out
of storage and activated it to stablelise - everything! :)
Tangents are infinite in all of nature in
all universes constantly and at random.
* D OUOSVAVV M *
Oh Joy!
Tom
The Psychedelic Pope
Patron Saint of the Internet
http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/
.
|
|
|
| User: "christisnotdore" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!??!!??! |
01 Dec 2004 05:35:01 PM |
|
|
(Tadapope) wrote in message news:<20041201123810.23235.00001465@mb-m03.aol.com>...
In the best interest of the planet Earth I have taken my global gyroscope out
of storage and activated it to stablelise - everything! :)
Good news! We don't need the moon anymore. Jettison that away somewhere outwards.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Barbarossa" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!??!!??! |
30 Nov 2004 09:53:22 PM |
|
|
"TrUlY WoNdRoUs YeS SiReE YeS InDeEdY Do" <trulywondrous2004@yahoo.com.au>
schreef in bericht news:857d0ce0.0411292357.620a877d@posting.google.com...
Measurements taken over the past six
weeks seem to indicate a slight increase
in the deviation of the Earth's wobble.
Does anyone else have supporting data?
The deviation from the mean axis was
actually expected to be decreasing at this
time, but the opposite effect seems to be
taking place. The measurements were
collected as part of a geophysical
experiment plotting the position of Polaris
(along with other bodies) relative to two
ground-based reference points. The
amount of the deviation translates into a
shift of ~0.75° from the expected position
based upon projections published two
years ago by the European Space Agency
and re-mapped to the location where the
measurements have been taken over the
past eight months. The error factor for the
mapping can account for no more than
one quarter of the effect noted.
Links please?
Kind Regards,
Barbarossa
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jaberwokie" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!??!!??! |
01 Dec 2004 01:13:51 AM |
|
|
The poles are shifting at an increasing rate too. I wonder how that will
affect wildlife that migrates when the pole shift is over in about 500
years.
Barbarossa wrote:
"TrUlY WoNdRoUs YeS SiReE YeS InDeEdY Do" <trulywondrous2004@yahoo.com.au>
schreef in bericht news:857d0ce0.0411292357.620a877d@posting.google.com...
Measurements taken over the past six
weeks seem to indicate a slight increase
in the deviation of the Earth's wobble.
Does anyone else have supporting data?
The deviation from the mean axis was
actually expected to be decreasing at this
time, but the opposite effect seems to be
taking place. The measurements were
collected as part of a geophysical
experiment plotting the position of Polaris
(along with other bodies) relative to two
ground-based reference points. The
amount of the deviation translates into a
shift of ~0.75° from the expected position
based upon projections published two
years ago by the European Space Agency
and re-mapped to the location where the
measurements have been taken over the
past eight months. The error factor for the
mapping can account for no more than
one quarter of the effect noted.
Links please?
Kind Regards,
Barbarossa
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Wallys World" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!??!!??! |
02 Dec 2004 08:19:11 PM |
|
|
Jaberwokie <Jaberwokie@Global.net> wrote in message news:<S9erd.78954$jE2.48281@bignews4.bellsouth.net>...
The poles are shifting at an increasing rate too. I wonder how that will
affect wildlife that migrates when the pole shift is over in about 500
years.
& the polar ice caps are melting at an unprecedented rate, but that problem
is ignored too by stupid ignorant humans.......
Oh well, Hellllllllllooooooooooooooooooo Waterworld !!!!
sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet ;-)
Hooroo ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-)
============================================================================
Barbarossa wrote:
"TrUlY WoNdRoUs YeS SiReE YeS InDeEdY Do" <trulywondrous2004@yahoo.com.au>
schreef in bericht news:857d0ce0.0411292357.620a877d@posting.google.com...
Measurements taken over the past six
weeks seem to indicate a slight increase
in the deviation of the Earth's wobble.
Does anyone else have supporting data?
The deviation from the mean axis was
actually expected to be decreasing at this
time, but the opposite effect seems to be
taking place. The measurements were
collected as part of a geophysical
experiment plotting the position of Polaris
(along with other bodies) relative to two
ground-based reference points. The
amount of the deviation translates into a
shift of ~0.75° from the expected position
based upon projections published two
years ago by the European Space Agency
and re-mapped to the location where the
measurements have been taken over the
past eight months. The error factor for the
mapping can account for no more than
one quarter of the effect noted.
Links please?
Kind Regards,
Barbarossa
.
|
|
|
| User: "christisnotdore" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!??!!??! |
03 Dec 2004 05:53:24 PM |
|
|
(Uncle Wally's World) wrote in message news:<a7ef5981.0412021819.46f15cc7@posting.google.com>...
Jaberwokie <Jaberwokie@Global.net> wrote in message news:<S9erd.78954$jE2.48281@bignews4.bellsouth.net>...
The poles are shifting at an increasing rate too. I wonder how that will
affect wildlife that migrates when the pole shift is over in about 500
years.
& the polar ice caps are melting at an unprecedented rate, but that problem
is ignored too by stupid ignorant humans.......
Oh well, Hellllllllllooooooooooooooooooo Waterworld !!!!
Great movie for TV. I saw it recently. I didn't appreciate sitting
through the movie in a theater the first time though.
...................................
sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet ;-)
Hooroo ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-)
============================================================================
Barbarossa wrote:
"TrUlY WoNdRoUs YeS SiReE YeS InDeEdY Do" <trulywondrous2004@yahoo.com.au>
schreef in bericht news:857d0ce0.0411292357.620a877d@posting.google.com...
Measurements taken over the past six
weeks seem to indicate a slight increase
in the deviation of the Earth's wobble.
Does anyone else have supporting data?
The deviation from the mean axis was
actually expected to be decreasing at this
time, but the opposite effect seems to be
taking place. The measurements were
collected as part of a geophysical
experiment plotting the position of Polaris
(along with other bodies) relative to two
ground-based reference points. The
amount of the deviation translates into a
shift of ~0.75° from the expected position
based upon projections published two
years ago by the European Space Agency
and re-mapped to the location where the
measurements have been taken over the
past eight months. The error factor for the
mapping can account for no more than
one quarter of the effect noted.
Links please?
Kind Regards,
Barbarossa
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Wallys World" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!??!!??! |
03 Dec 2004 08:22:22 PM |
|
|
(christisnotdore) wrote in message news:<c0528add.0412031553.5750184f@posting.google.com>...
unclewallysworld@yahoo.ca (Uncle Wally's World) wrote in message news:<a7ef5981.0412021819.46f15cc7@posting.google.com>...
Jaberwokie <Jaberwokie@Global.net> wrote in message news:<S9erd.78954$jE2.48281@bignews4.bellsouth.net>...
The poles are shifting at an increasing rate too. I wonder how that will
affect wildlife that migrates when the pole shift is over in about 500
years.
& the polar ice caps are melting at an unprecedented rate, but that problem
is ignored too by stupid ignorant humans.......
Oh well, Hellllllllllooooooooooooooooooo Waterworld !!!!
Great movie for TV. I saw it recently. I didn't appreciate sitting
through the movie in a theater the first time though.
I just watch it so I can see the backside of that Tripplehorne chick ;-)
Hubba Bubba Hubba !!!
Hooroo ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-)(who saw her front in Basic Instinct ;-)
=========================================================================
..................................
sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet ;-)
Hooroo ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-)
============================================================================
Barbarossa wrote:
"TrUlY WoNdRoUs YeS SiReE YeS InDeEdY Do" <trulywondrous2004@yahoo.com.au>
schreef in bericht news:857d0ce0.0411292357.620a877d@posting.google.com...
Measurements taken over the past six
weeks seem to indicate a slight increase
in the deviation of the Earth's wobble.
Does anyone else have supporting data?
The deviation from the mean axis was
actually expected to be decreasing at this
time, but the opposite effect seems to be
taking place. The measurements were
collected as part of a geophysical
experiment plotting the position of Polaris
(along with other bodies) relative to two
ground-based reference points. The
amount of the deviation translates into a
shift of ~0.75° from the expected position
based upon projections published two
years ago by the European Space Agency
and re-mapped to the location where the
measurements have been taken over the
past eight months. The error factor for the
mapping can account for no more than
one quarter of the effect noted.
Links please?
Kind Regards,
Barbarossa
.
|
|
|
| User: "christisnotdore" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!??!!??! |
04 Dec 2004 05:06:28 PM |
|
|
(Uncle Wally's World) wrote in message news:<a7ef5981.0412031822.5addbbfa@posting.google.com>...
christisnotdore@yahoo.com (christisnotdore) wrote in message news:<c0528add.0412031553.5750184f@posting.google.com>...
(Uncle Wally's World) wrote in message news:<a7ef5981.0412021819.46f15cc7@posting.google.com>...
Jaberwokie <Jaberwokie@Global.net> wrote in message news:<S9erd.78954$jE2.48281@bignews4.bellsouth.net>...
The poles are shifting at an increasing rate too. I wonder how that will
affect wildlife that migrates when the pole shift is over in about 500
years.
& the polar ice caps are melting at an unprecedented rate, but that problem
is ignored too by stupid ignorant humans.......
Oh well, Hellllllllllooooooooooooooooooo Waterworld !!!!
Great movie for TV. I saw it recently. I didn't appreciate sitting
through the movie in a theater the first time though.
I just watch it so I can see the backside of that Tripplehorne chick ;-)
I believe the message of the movie was more than that. LOL...
Hubba Bubba Hubba !!!
It's a damn shame that movie actresses are considered over the hill
for sexy roles when they reach 40. What ever happened to Julia Ormond.
Kate Capshaw started acting late. She was great also. Rumors are that
Harrison Ford and Kate Capshaw will be back in a new Indiana Jones
movie soon. I wonder if Kate plays sexy or a mother of a young woman
in her twenties.
Hooroo ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-)(who saw her front in Basic Instinct ;-)
Was Sharon Stone in that? Maybe she's over the hill also. Obviously,
the TV I watch leaves out nude scenes. Premium cable would be too
expensive and addictive, plus I don't watch TV on some days.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!??!!??! |
04 Dec 2004 10:31:01 PM |
|
|
On 4 Dec 2004 15:06:28 -0800,
(christisnotdore) wrote:
unclewallysworld@yahoo.ca (Uncle Wally's World) wrote in message news:<a7ef5981.0412031822.5addbbfa@posting.google.com>...
(christisnotdore) wrote in message news:<c0528add.0412031553.5750184f@posting.google.com>...
unclewallysworld@yahoo.ca (Uncle Wally's World) wrote in message news:<a7ef5981.0412021819.46f15cc7@posting.google.com>...
Jaberwokie <Jaberwokie@Global.net> wrote in message news:<S9erd.78954$jE2.48281@bignews4.bellsouth.net>...
The poles are shifting at an increasing rate too. I wonder how that will
affect wildlife that migrates when the pole shift is over in about 500
years.
& the polar ice caps are melting at an unprecedented rate, but that problem
is ignored too by stupid ignorant humans.......
Oh well, Hellllllllllooooooooooooooooooo Waterworld !!!!
Great movie for TV. I saw it recently. I didn't appreciate sitting
through the movie in a theater the first time though.
I just watch it so I can see the backside of that Tripplehorne chick ;-)
I believe the message of the movie was more than that. LOL...
Hubba Bubba Hubba !!!
It's a damn shame that movie actresses are considered over the hill
for sexy roles when they reach 40. What ever happened to Julia Ormond.
Kate Capshaw started acting late. She was great also. Rumors are that
Harrison Ford and Kate Capshaw will be back in a new Indiana Jones
movie soon. I wonder if Kate plays sexy or a mother of a young woman
in her twenties.
Hooroo ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-)(who saw her front in Basic Instinct ;-)
Was Sharon Stone in that? Maybe she's over the hill also. Obviously,
the TV I watch leaves out nude scenes. Premium cable would be too
expensive and addictive, plus I don't watch TV on some days.
Madonna
Demi Moore
Kim Basinger
Julia Roberts
Claudia Schiffer
Kylie Mynogue (sp?)
Uma Therman
(who am I forgetting?)
Are all still amazingly beautiful in my opinion.
Much much more so than Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera.
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "victor" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!??!!??! |
06 Dec 2004 05:00:57 PM |
|
|
Dani wrote:
On 4 Dec 2004 15:06:28 -0800,
(christisnotdore) wrote:
unclewallysworld@yahoo.ca (Uncle Wally's World) wrote in message
news:<a7ef5981.0412031822.5addbbfa@posting.google.com>...
(christisnotdore) wrote in message
news:<c0528add.0412031553.5750184f@posting.google.com>...
unclewallysworld@yahoo.ca (Uncle Wally's World) wrote in message
news:<a7ef5981.0412021819.46f15cc7@posting.google.com>...
Jaberwokie <Jaberwokie@Global.net> wrote in message
news:<S9erd.78954$jE2.48281@bignews4.bellsouth.net>...
The poles are shifting at an increasing rate too. I wonder
how that will
affect wildlife that migrates when the pole shift is over in
about 500
years.
& the polar ice caps are melting at an unprecedented rate, but
that problem
is ignored too by stupid ignorant humans.......
Oh well, Hellllllllllooooooooooooooooooo Waterworld !!!!
Great movie for TV. I saw it recently. I didn't appreciate
sitting
through the movie in a theater the first time though.
I just watch it so I can see the backside of that Tripplehorne
chick ;-)
I believe the message of the movie was more than that. LOL...
Hubba Bubba Hubba !!!
It's a damn shame that movie actresses are considered over the hill
for sexy roles when they reach 40. What ever happened to Julia
Ormond.
Kate Capshaw started acting late. She was great also. Rumors are
that
Harrison Ford and Kate Capshaw will be back in a new Indiana Jones
movie soon. I wonder if Kate plays sexy or a mother of a young woman
in her twenties.
Hooroo ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-)(who saw her front in Basic Instinct ;-)
Was Sharon Stone in that? Maybe she's over the hill also. Obviously,
the TV I watch leaves out nude scenes. Premium cable would be too
expensive and addictive, plus I don't watch TV on some days.
Madonna
Really?
Demi Moore
Really? She doesn't play roles like in "Ghost". She was the villian in
Charlie's Angels second movie. She does keep in shape. When will she be
featured again?
Kim Basinger
Maybe from a woman's perspective. Was good in that cell phone movie.
Julia Roberts
Intellectual. Age 37. I stated age 40.
Claudia Schiffer
Kylie Mynogue (sp?)
Never heard of her. Looks good. Age about 37.
Uma Therman
Uma Thurman, will be 40 in 2008.
(who am I forgetting?)
Are all still amazingly beautiful in my opinion.
Okay Kylie and Uma have looks and talent, and are under 40.
Much much more so than Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera.
Or not.
As an example, Kathleen Turner. She starred opposite Nicholas Cage in
Peggy Sue Got Married. Where is she now.
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Su Zanadu" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??... |
06 Dec 2004 09:46:21 PM |
|
|
Dee and Dani,
Gorgeous actresses over 40?
Kim Delaney
Kim Kattrall (sp?)
Susan Dey
Jaclyn Smith (okay she's not acting but is still drop-dead gorgeous, in
her 50's and has her own line of clothes at K-Mart.)
Heather Locklear
Valerie Bertinelli
Nothing from those Brady girls lately. ;)
I'll probably wake up at 2am when a dozen or so more hit me....
SuZanne
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??... |
07 Dec 2004 04:07:15 AM |
|
|
"Su Zanadu" <tugbertswife@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:14369-41B5278D-99@storefull-3211.bay.webtv.net...
Dee and Dani,
Gorgeous actresses over 40?
Kim Delaney
Kim Kattrall (sp?)
Susan Dey
Jaclyn Smith (okay she's not acting but is still drop-dead gorgeous, in
her 50's and has her own line of clothes at K-Mart.)
Heather Locklear
Valerie Bertinelli
Nothing from those Brady girls lately. ;)
I'll probably wake up at 2am when a dozen or so more hit me....
SuZanne
Don't forget Susan Sarandon! She still gets good (and sexy) roles, too!
(She has those pesky liberal views, but I like her movies anyway...:-) )
Jane
.
|
|
|
| User: "victor" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??... |
07 Dec 2004 05:38:47 PM |
|
|
In a theatrical movie? TV is more politically correct. In her prime (as
they say), she was great.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "victor" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??... |
07 Dec 2004 05:40:01 PM |
|
|
In a theatrical movie? TV is more politically correct. In her prime (as
they say), she was great.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??... |
07 Dec 2004 06:00:25 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:46:21 -0500, (Su Zanadu)
wrote:
Dee and Dani,
Gorgeous actresses over 40?
Kim Delaney
Kim Kattrall (sp?)
Susan Dey
Jaclyn Smith (okay she's not acting but is still drop-dead gorgeous, in
her 50's and has her own line of clothes at K-Mart.)
Heather Locklear
Valerie Bertinelli
Kristie Brinkley
Suzanne Somers
And a few men:
Bruce Willis (*love* him)
Mel Gibson
George Clooney
Denzel Washington
Nothing from those Brady girls lately. ;)
hehe .. :)
I'll probably wake up at 2am when a dozen or so more hit me....
SuZanne
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "victor" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??... |
07 Dec 2004 05:24:31 PM |
|
|
Su Zanadu wrote:
Dee and Dani,
Gorgeous actresses over 40?
It's not really my bias. Movie studio execs have that bias that is well
known to actresses, lamented by many actresses who have been
interviewed, including Meryl Streep.
Movies are made often to attract the most money. That means appealing
to the 15-30 age group or thereabouts.
Kim Delaney
The name is vaguely familiar
Kim Kattrall (sp?)
Definitely attractive. Doubt she plays the romantic lead in a
theatrical movie though.
TV might be more politically correct.
Susan Dey
Likewise.
Jaclyn Smith (okay she's not acting but is still drop-dead gorgeous,
in
her 50's and has her own line of clothes at K-Mart.)
I saw her do a cameo in a movie. Check her filmography.
Attractive yes; lead in a romance movie, probably not.
Heather Locklear
Attractive yes; lead in a romance movie, probably not.
Valerie Bertinelli
Really?
Nothing from those Brady girls lately. ;)
I'll probably wake up at 2am when a dozen or so more hit me....
Heck, with cosmetic surgery, Cher probably looks good. Mae West was
sexy in her 60's and 70's. Cher has been in movies, cameos.
SuZanne
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "victor" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??... |
07 Dec 2004 05:36:43 PM |
|
|
Su Zanadu wrote:
Dee and Dani,
Gorgeous actresses over 40?
This is not a bias of mine especially. Movie studio execs seem to think
they cannot make money using such actresses as romantic leads in
movies. Many actresses have lamented that fact, including Meryl Streep.
It is in their mind as well. To make money, movies are often geared to
satisfy the 15-30 crowd.
Damn Google erased a similar response minutes ago. I must copy all my
messages from now on.
Kim Delaney
Barely recall her name.
Kim Kattrall (sp?)
Definitely attractive. Apparently the most experienced in the City TV
show. Doubt she will play the romantic lead in a major movie though.
Susan Dey
Likewise.
Jaclyn Smith (okay she's not acting but is still drop-dead gorgeous,
in
I think she played at least once recently in a cameo in a movie,
because of her legendary status.
her 50's and has her own line of clothes at K-Mart.)
Heather Locklear
Doubt she will play the romantic lead in a major movie. I think she's
sexy though.
Valerie Bertinelli
If you say so.
Nothing from those Brady girls lately. ;)
I'll probably wake up at 2am when a dozen or so more hit me....
Heck with cosmetic surgery, Cher looks sexy. She did at least one cameo
role (or more, supporting role) because of her legendary status,
recently. Even Mae West was sexy in her 60's 70's. Would the younger
crowd buy it, nah.
SuZanne
.
|
|
|
| User: "Su Zanadu" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??... |
08 Dec 2004 06:06:04 AM |
|
|
Victor wrote:
(Victor???)
SuZanne wrote:
Kim Delaney
Barely recall her name.
"ALL MY CHILDREN"?
Remember Jenny Gardner? Remember her gaudy/tacky mother Opal? She went
on to lots of TV and movies including LA LAW.
http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0001126/
Kim Kattrall (sp?)
Definitely attractive. Apparently the most
experienced in the City TV show. Doubt
she will play the romantic lead in a
major movie though.
I remember her way back when she did (I think) the movies MANNEQUIN.
Darn! Time to wake the second shift. Maybe someday soon I can post
normally. I would hate to drop out of the all time posters list too. ;)
Catch ya later,
SuZanne
Susan Dey
.
|
|
|
| User: "victor" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??... |
08 Dec 2004 06:48:21 PM |
|
|
Victor wrote:
(Victor???)
SuZanne wrote:
Kim Delaney
Barely recall her name.
["ALL MY CHILDREN"?
Remember Jenny Gardner? Remember her gaudy/tacky mother Opal? She went
on to lots of TV and movies including LA LAW.
http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0001126]
Never watched an entire episode of AMC. Maybe my mother was a fan.
Well, she might have been around in movies I saw, but I didn't notice
her.
I was a fan of Dana Delaney. I hope she does some movie or TV work. She
had a distinctive style and look, though she's now approaching the
dreaded 50. Ain't so bad for guys. Women hate that number though.
Kim Kattrall (sp?)
Definitely attractive. Apparently the most
experienced in the City TV show. Doubt
she will play the romantic lead in a
major movie though.
[I remember her way back when she did (I think) the movies MANNEQUIN.]
I have a friend who saw that (the first one) a lot of times in a
theater. I remember her from that movie. Strange how a movie like that
could launch a career. Kirstin Dunst became noticed in "Bring It On",
though she was a child star before. "Bring It On" would be in the same
class as "Mannequin", cheesy fun for young people of all ages (men
mostly). Kirstin seems destined for greater heights than Kim.
[Darn! Time to wake the second shift. Maybe someday soon I can post
normally.]
I'll be in lurk mode. My bosses would eviscerate me if they knew how
much time I spent reading apn pre-and-post election. Good fun though.
Got to discuss important topics like tattoos, etc. Yesterday reminded
me too much of those years when I slaved away in apn for nothing other
than the sheer satisfaction of debunking Jean; I'm kidding.
[I would hate to drop out of the all time posters list too. ;)]
I'd say go for the record, but your kids would hate you then.
[Catch ya later,]
Always a pleasure conversing with you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Su Zanadu" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??... |
08 Dec 2004 09:26:44 PM |
|
|
I read your reply Victor.
Too tired to punch all those stinking arrows in or to cheat even with
brackets. Just wanted to let you know that I read it and that I too was
glad to have this conversation.
Night night.
SuZanne
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "victor" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??... |
08 Dec 2004 06:51:21 PM |
|
|
Victor wrote:
(Victor???)
SuZanne wrote:
Kim Delaney
Barely recall her name.
["ALL MY CHILDREN"?
Remember Jenny Gardner? Remember her gaudy/tacky mother Opal? She went
on to lots of TV and movies including LA LAW.
http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0001126]
Never watched an entire episode of AMC. Maybe my mother was a fan.
Well, she might have been around in movies I saw, but I didn't notice
her.
I was a fan of Dana Delaney. I hope she does some movie or TV work. She
had a distinctive style and look, though she's now approaching the
dreaded 50. Ain't so bad for guys. Women hate that number though.
Kim Kattrall (sp?)
Definitely attractive. Apparently the most
experienced in the City TV show. Doubt
she will play the romantic lead in a
major movie though.
[I remember her way back when she did (I think) the movies MANNEQUIN.]
I have a friend who saw that (the first one) a lot of times in a
theater. I remember her from that movie. Strange how a movie like that
could launch a career. Kirstin Dunst became noticed in "Bring It On",
though she was a child star before. "Bring It On" would be in the same
class as "Mannequin", cheesy fun for young people of all ages (men
mostly). Kirstin seems destined for greater heights than Kim.
[Darn! Time to wake the second shift. Maybe someday soon I can post
normally.]
I'll be in lurk mode. My bosses would eviscerate me if they knew how
much time I spent reading apn pre-and-post election. Good fun though.
Got to discuss important topics like tattoos, etc. Yesterday reminded
me too much of those years when I slaved away in apn for nothing other
than the sheer satisfaction of debunking Jean; I'm kidding.
[I would hate to drop out of the all time posters list too. ;)]
I'd say go for the record, but your kids would hate you then.
[Catch ya later,]
Always a pleasure conversing with you.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "victor" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??... |
08 Dec 2004 06:54:24 PM |
|
|
Victor wrote:
(Victor???)
SuZanne wrote:
Kim Delaney
Barely recall her name.
["ALL MY CHILDREN"?
Remember Jenny Gardner? Remember her gaudy/tacky mother Opal? She went
on to lots of TV and movies including LA LAW.
http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0001126]
Never watched an entire episode of AMC. Maybe my mother was a fan.
Well, she might have been around in movies I saw, but I didn't notice
her.
I was a fan of Dana Delaney. I hope she does some movie or TV work. She
had a distinctive style and look, though she's now approaching the
dreaded 50. Ain't so bad for guys. Women hate that number though.
Kim Kattrall (sp?)
Definitely attractive. Apparently the most
experienced in the City TV show. Doubt
she will play the romantic lead in a
major movie though.
[I remember her way back when she did (I think) the movies MANNEQUIN.]
I have a friend who saw that (the first one) a lot of times in a
theater. I remember her from that movie. Strange how a movie like that
could launch a career. Kirstin Dunst became noticed in "Bring It On",
though she was a child star before. "Bring It On" would be in the same
class as "Mannequin", cheesy fun for young people of all ages (men
mostly). Kirstin seems destined for greater heights than Kim.
[Darn! Time to wake the second shift. Maybe someday soon I can post
normally.]
I'll be in lurk mode. My bosses would eviscerate me if they knew how
much time I spent reading apn pre-and-post election. Good fun though.
Got to discuss important topics like tattoos, etc. Yesterday reminded
me too much of those years when I slaved away in apn for nothing other
than the sheer satisfaction of debunking Jean; I'm kidding.
[I would hate to drop out of the all time posters list too. ;)]
I'd say go for the record, but your kids would hate you then.
[Catch ya later,]
Always a pleasure conversing with you.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!??!!??! |
07 Dec 2004 10:21:48 PM |
|
|
On 6 Dec 2004 15:00:57 -0800, "victor" <christisnotdore@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Uncle Wally ;-)(who saw her front in Basic Instinct ;-)
Was Sharon Stone in that? Maybe she's over the hill also. Obviously,
the TV I watch leaves out nude scenes. Premium cable would be too
expensive and addictive, plus I don't watch TV on some days.
Madonna
Really?
I personally think she is a beautiful woman. Her big blue eyes make
her, I think. A lot of people really don't think she's pretty, but
when she's *natural* (not all that stupid ***** leather and freaked out
boob cones on her and all that make-up and weird hair.)
Not her back then.
But she is naturally beautiful.
Demi Moore
Of course. Her lips are a little to thin, but she's got that smile,
long brown hair/eyes, and raspy voice. Definitely a beauty.
Really? She doesn't play roles like in "Ghost". She was the villian in
Charlie's Angels second movie. She does keep in shape. When will she be
featured again?
I haven't a clue.
Kim Basinger
Maybe from a woman's perspective. Was good in that cell phone movie.
No way she is beautiful. Look at her lips. Some women actually get
*lip implants* LOL! Imagine that.
Julia Roberts
Intellectual. Age 37. I stated age 40.
Close enough. I'm really talking about the actresses and models that
I view as older.
Julia's an odd beauty. Not really pretty at all when she isn't
smiling; but radiant when she does.
Claudia Schiffer
Kylie Mynogue (sp?)
Never heard of her. Looks good. Age about 37.
Never heard of which one? Claudia or Kylie? You had to have heard
about Claudia so I'll assume you're talking about Klyie.
Uma Therman
Uma Thurman, will be 40 in 2008.
I know but she still seems older to me compared to my generation of
Britney Spears, Christina Augilera, Drew Barrymore, Liv Tyler, Avril
Lavinge, Paris Hilton, Angelina Jolie etc..
(who am I forgetting?)
Are all still amazingly beautiful in my opinion.
Okay Kylie and Uma have looks and talent, and are under 40.
So it was Claudia you've never heard of? Oh My! Anyway, yeah,
both beautiful in different ways.
Much much more so than Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera.
Or not.
In my opinion they are (by far). Britney is *cute* very cute. She
has that adorable smile and that baby face. We're talking beauty
though. Christina? - Why the HELL did she turn her hair black? Nasty!
It's blonde again now, but I think the image she left in my head of
that God awful hair she had going there for a bit can never allow me
to see her as pretty again.
As an example, Kathleen Turner. She starred opposite Nicholas Cage in
Peggy Sue Got Married. Where is she now.
I don't think Kathleen Turner is pretty (sorry).
But Nicholas Cage - love 'em. I don't find him attracive really, and
I most certainly don't have a crush on him like I do with Bruce Willis
and Kid Rock - but there's just something about Nick that I've always
found outstanding and unique.
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Jackson McDickle" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!??!!??! |
30 Nov 2004 05:32:16 AM |
|
|
"TrUlY WoNdRoUs YeS SiReE YeS InDeEdY Do" <trulywondrous2004@yahoo.com.au>
wrote in message news:857d0ce0.0411292357.620a877d@posting.google.com...
Measurements taken over the past six
weeks seem to indicate a slight increase
in the deviation of the Earth's wobble.
Does anyone else have supporting data?
The deviation from the mean axis was
actually expected to be decreasing at this
time, but the opposite effect seems to be
taking place. The measurements were
collected as part of a geophysical
experiment plotting the position of Polaris
(along with other bodies) relative to two
ground-based reference points. The
amount of the deviation translates into a
shift of ~0.75° from the expected position
based upon projections published two
years ago by the European Space Agency
and re-mapped to the location where the
measurements have been taken over the
past eight months. The error factor for the
mapping can account for no more than
one quarter of the effect noted.
Any chance I'll get to see my enemies die before I do? Please reply ASAP
because I'm thinking about killing them. ;)
bwahahhhahahahahahaaaa ;)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "=?iso-8859-1?q?La_Bocca_Della_Verit=E0_-_D=E9j=E0_Vu_Le_Proph=E9te?=" |
|
| Title: =?iso-8859-1?q?Re:_EARTH_'S_WOBBLE_INCREASING_=3F!=3F!=3F!=3F!=3F!=3F=3F!=3F=3F!=3F!=3F!=3F=3F!=3F!=3F!=3F=3F!=3F!=3F!=3F=3F!=3F!=3F!=3F=3F!=3F!=3F!=3F!=3F!=3F=3F!=3F=3F!=3F!=AD=3F=3F!!=3F=3F!?= |
08 Jan 2005 09:48:58 PM |
|
|
Major Earthquakes around the World, 2004
Date Location Magnitude1
Jan. 3 Southeast of the Loyalty Islands, New Caledonia 7.1
Feb. 5 Papua, Indonesia 7.0
Feb. 7 Near the south coast of Papua, Indonesia 7.3
July 15 Fiji Region 7.1
July 25 Southern Sumatra, Indonesia 7.3
Sept. 5 Near the south coast of western Honshu, Japan 7.2
Sept. 5 Near the south coast of Honshu, Japan 7.4
Nov. 11 Kepulauan Alor, Indonesia 7.5
Nov. 15 West Coast, Colombia 7.2
Nov. 22 West Coast, South Island, New Zealand 7.1
Nov. 26 Papua, Indonesia 7.1
Nov. 28 Hokkaido, Japan 7.0
Dec. 23 Macquarie Island, Antarctica 8.1
Dec. 26 Nicobar Islands, India 7.1
Dec. 26 West Coast, N.Sumatra, Indonesia 9.0
========================================
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "d" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!??!!??! |
18 Dec 2004 09:58:36 AM |
|
|
Perhaps this will help.
http://www.zetatalk3.com/index/earth180.htm
http://www.michaelmandeville.com/earthmonitor/polarmotion/plots/chandler_wobble_plots.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tadapope" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!??!!??! |
18 Dec 2004 07:23:21 PM |
|
|
Subject: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING
?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!??!!??!
From: d
Date: 12/18/2004 7:58 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <MsYwd.2632$9j5.396@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>
Perhaps this will help.
http://www.zetatalk3.com/index/earth180.htm
http://www.michaelmandeville.com/earthmonitor/polarmotion/plots/chandler_
wobble_plots.htm
Yes and I'm looking forward to the
mega-wobble effect when we have
total daylight 24/7 all over the planet
and never have to waist any more time of our lifes sleeping.
Just imagine all the progress and
evolvement we can all make!!!
Tangents are infinite in all of nature in
all universes constantly and at random.
* D OUOSVAVV M *
*PUBLIUS ENIGMA*
Oh Joy!
Tom
The Psychedelic Pope
Patron Saint of the Internet
http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wally Anglesea™" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!??!!??! |
18 Dec 2004 12:20:56 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 15:58:36 GMT, d <sweetgrass@earthlink.net> wrote:
Perhaps this will help.
http://www.zetatalk3.com/index/earth180.htm
ROFL! Nancy's a fraud. Her dwindling group of hangers on are more
stupid than she is.
http://www.michaelmandeville.com/earthmonitor/polarmotion/plots/chandler_wobble_plots.htm
Double ROFL. Mandeville is a nutjob, bilking the credulous rubes.
--
Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm
"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "dudelove" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!??!!??! |
30 Nov 2004 04:00:06 AM |
|
|
So are we all going to die??
Hope its a good ride before the end
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Doug" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!??!!??! |
30 Nov 2004 05:01:39 AM |
|
|
The wobble is increasing because of the amount of fatasses in North America.
--
-Doug-
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Never anonymous Bud" |
|
| Title: Re: EARTH 'S WOBBLE INCREASING ?!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!??!?!??!!??! |
30 Nov 2004 06:31:48 AM |
|
|
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, (TrUlY WoNdRoUs YeS SiReE YeS InDeEdY Do) on 29
Nov 2004 23:57:53 -0800 spoke:
Measurements taken over the past six
weeks seem to indicate a slight increase
in the deviation of the Earth's wobble.
Taken by whom?
Does anyone else have supporting data?
YOU are making the claim, you need to provide the evidence.
--
To reply by email, remove the XYZ.
Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.
This sig censored by the Office of Home and Land Insecurity....
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
