Fake Terror Video analysis (US Intel Center)



 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > Fake Terror Video analysis (US Intel Center)

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: ""
Date: 07 Aug 2007 06:04:17 AM
Object: Fake Terror Video analysis (US Intel Center)
http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/2007/08/us-psyop-photo-fakery-proof.html
Neal Krawetz, a researcher and computer security consultant, gave an
interesting presentation today at the BlackHat security conference in
Las Vegas about analyzing digital photographs and video images for
alterations and enhancements.
Using a program he wrote (and provided on the conference CD-ROM)
Krawetz could print out the quantization tables in a JPEG file (that
indicate how the image was compressed) and determine the last tool
that created the image -- that is, the make and model of the camera if
the image is original or the version of Photoshop that was used to
alter and re-save the image.
Comparing that data to the metadata embedded in the image he could
determine if the photo was original or had been re-saved or altered.
Then, using error level analysis of an image he could determine what
were the last parts of an image that were added or modified.
http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/2007/08/us-psyop-photo-fakery-proof.html
.

User: "Perseid"

Title: Re: Fake Terror Video analysis (US Intel Center) 07 Aug 2007 10:36:43 AM
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation,
Spat the Words

http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/2007/08/us-psyop-photo-fakery-

proof.html


Neal Krawetz, a researcher and computer security consultant, gave an
interesting presentation today at the BlackHat security conference in
Las Vegas about analyzing digital photographs and video images for
alterations and enhancements.

Using a program he wrote (and provided on the conference CD-ROM)
Krawetz could print out the quantization tables in a JPEG file (that
indicate how the image was compressed) and determine the last tool
that created the image -- that is, the make and model of the camera if
the image is original or the version of Photoshop that was used to
alter and re-save the image.

Comparing that data to the metadata embedded in the image he could
determine if the photo was original or had been re-saved or altered.
Then, using error level analysis of an image he could determine what
were the last parts of an image that were added or modified.

It sounds like a lot of math.. could be useful though. Those blackhat
and defcon people are quite interesting.. they make hacking sexy (just
so long as they don't take over my computer).


http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/2007/08/us-psyop-photo-fakery-

proof.html
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER