| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"The Angry Hierophant" |
| Date: |
13 Jul 2005 10:32:09 AM |
| Object: |
Family's home in jeopardy in eminent domain battle (yeah mother fuckers....) |
....BESIDES IN THE CITIES, IT WILL BE IN THE SOUTH WHERE PEOPLE WILL
FIRST START DYING ABOUT THIS ISSUE. SOUTH WILL RISE AGAIN IN ITS OWN
WAY. NOW GO READ REVELATION 18 NOW YOU FUCKING HOOK WORMS!!!! ***** YOU.
===================================================================
Family's home in jeopardy in domain battle
07/13/2005
By Christy Smith
Staff Correspondent
BUFORD - Georgia cities and counties can exercise eminent domain to
condemn property and purchase it for reasons that would be beneficial
to the public's general well-being, such as for road improvements,
transportation systems, or a dam to stop spring floods.
The Georgia Constitution defines these privileges.
Buford City Commissioners on Monday voted to begin proceedings in
Gwinnett County Superior Court to condemn property at 608 Sawnee Ave.
for road improvements.
The property is owned by William T. Yancy, who has operated his
business, Yancy Rebuild Service, on the site for 22 years. Yancy
rebuilds automotive starters and alternators, and he and his wife live
in an apartment in his shop. Several buildings stand on the acreage
that are 40 to 60 years old, said Yancy.
Buford city officials have offered to buy the property from Yancy.
"I can't divulge their price right now, but it's not enough,"
Yancy said.
Yancy is being represented by Attorney Gibson Dean, and he says he is
prepared for a court battle. If Buford acquires the property, it will
remain as greenspace for the time being, Commissioner Michael Smith
said.
The U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled to expand the use of eminent
domain in the Kelo v. City of New London, Conn., case that allows the
city to seize private land for a development of offices, a hotel and
conference center.
The Georgia Senate recently examined two house bills regarding eminent
domain. Georgia Senate Bill 86, authored by Sen. Jeff Chapman, District
3, passed the Senate in 2005 on a 40-10 vote. It would prohibit using
eminent domain for economic development purposes. The House could vote
on it next year. SB 30 would have required governments to hold a
hearing for condemnation when zoning and land-use decisions affect a
property's use. It did not pass the Senate in 2005.
Several Georgia property owners are fighting the use of eminent domain.
Stockbridge Florist and Gifts Inc. is facing condemnation that allows
Stockbridge to proceed with its urban redevelopment plan.
.
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Family's home in jeopardy in eminent domain battle (yeah motherfuckers....) |
13 Jul 2005 06:53:12 PM |
|
|
The Angry Hierophant wrote:
....BESIDES IN THE CITIES, IT WILL BE IN THE SOUTH WHERE PEOPLE WILL
FIRST START DYING ABOUT THIS ISSUE. SOUTH WILL RISE AGAIN IN ITS OWN
WAY. NOW GO READ REVELATION 18 NOW YOU FUCKING HOOK WORMS!!!! ***** YOU.
===================================================================
Family's home in jeopardy in domain battle
07/13/2005
By Christy Smith
Staff Correspondent
BUFORD - Georgia cities and counties can exercise eminent domain to
condemn property and purchase it for reasons that would be beneficial
to the public's general well-being, such as for road improvements,
transportation systems, or a dam to stop spring floods.
The Georgia Constitution defines these privileges.
Buford City Commissioners on Monday voted to begin proceedings in
Gwinnett County Superior Court to condemn property at 608 Sawnee Ave.
for road improvements.
The property is owned by William T. Yancy, who has operated his
business, Yancy Rebuild Service, on the site for 22 years. Yancy
rebuilds automotive starters and alternators, and he and his wife live
in an apartment in his shop. Several buildings stand on the acreage
that are 40 to 60 years old, said Yancy.
Buford city officials have offered to buy the property from Yancy.
"I can't divulge their price right now, but it's not enough,"
Yancy said.
I don't see why he can't divulge the offering price - that's taxpayer
money and should be a matter of public record.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
