http://www.wimp.com/invading/
.
|
|
| User: "InquiringMind" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
17 Oct 2005 06:19:01 PM |
|
|
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1129486163.200187.125290@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
http://www.wimp.com/invading/
"I had NO idea. South Korea IS much smaller than North Korea"..
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This kind of ignorance makes me *shudder*...
Idiots shouldn't be allowed to have opinions. They have no clue what they
are talking about.
IM
.
|
|
|
| User: "goozlefotz" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
17 Oct 2005 07:59:01 PM |
|
|
InquiringMind wrote:
Idiots shouldn't be allowed to have opinions. They have no clue what they
are talking about.
And, of course, you get to decide who is an idiot and who is not.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
18 Oct 2005 08:32:58 AM |
|
|
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129597141.322267.19160@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
InquiringMind wrote:
Idiots shouldn't be allowed to have opinions. They have no clue what
they
are talking about.
And, of course, you get to decide who is an idiot and who is not.
Talking of idiocy, are you still running from this?
"Your "everyone else" does not include me. I am a registered
professional engineer and could have signed off on the design drawings
for those buildings. I definitely do not accept the official version
of the collapses. Remember, for example, that the smaller building
(7?) collapsed also even though it was never hit. "
.
|
|
|
| User: "goozlefotz" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
18 Oct 2005 01:21:48 PM |
|
|
tw wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129597141.322267.19160@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
InquiringMind wrote:
Idiots shouldn't be allowed to have opinions. They have no clue what
they
are talking about.
And, of course, you get to decide who is an idiot and who is not.
Talking of idiocy, are you still running from this?
"Your "everyone else" does not include me. I am a registered
professional engineer and could have signed off on the design drawings
for those buildings. I definitely do not accept the official version
of the collapses. Remember, for example, that the smaller building
(7?) collapsed also even though it was never hit. "
I looked back through your posts to see if you are always this rude and
crude. The answer is "yes". You sure have a lot of different screen
names. What are you running from?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
18 Oct 2005 03:22:11 PM |
|
|
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129659708.489954.325780@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
tw wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129597141.322267.19160@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
InquiringMind wrote:
Idiots shouldn't be allowed to have opinions. They have no clue what
they
are talking about.
And, of course, you get to decide who is an idiot and who is not.
Talking of idiocy, are you still running from this?
"Your "everyone else" does not include me. I am a registered
professional engineer and could have signed off on the design drawings
for those buildings. I definitely do not accept the official version
of the collapses. Remember, for example, that the smaller building
(7?) collapsed also even though it was never hit. "
I looked back through your posts to see if you are always this rude and
crude.
You must be mistaken, the paragraph in quotation marks is your own writing.
The answer is "yes". You sure have a lot of different screen
names.
Two is a lot? (hardly ecver use teh google groups one now)
What are you running from?
What makes you think I am? Care to tell us why you believe the collapse of
WTC7 isn't explained by "officialdom"?
.
|
|
|
| User: "goozlefotz" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
20 Oct 2005 08:26:27 AM |
|
|
Tom wrote:
The answer is "yes". You sure have a lot of different screen
names.
Two is a lot? (hardly ecver use teh google groups one now)
Do others post to Google newsgroups from your e-mail address? When I
run "find messages by this author" at least half a dozen screen names
show up in the response. "tw" and "Tom" are both there. That is what
prompted my remark.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
20 Oct 2005 08:30:54 AM |
|
|
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129814787.839877.294410@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Tom wrote:
The answer is "yes". You sure have a lot of different screen
names.
Two is a lot? (hardly ecver use teh google groups one now)
Do others post to Google newsgroups from your e-mail address?
Seeing as isn't a valid email address, I expect so.
When I run "find messages by this author" at least half a dozen screen
names
show up in the response. "tw" and "Tom" are both there. That is what
prompted my remark.
Why not simply stick to the point? Care to tell us why you believe the
collapse of
WTC7 isn't explained by "officialdom"?
.
|
|
|
| User: "goozlefotz" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
21 Oct 2005 10:02:01 AM |
|
|
tw wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129814787.839877.294410@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Tom wrote:
The answer is "yes". You sure have a lot of different screen
names.
Two is a lot? (hardly ecver use teh google groups one now)
Do others post to Google newsgroups from your e-mail address?
Seeing as isn't a valid email address, I expect so.
When I run "find messages by this author" at least half a dozen screen
names
show up in the response. "tw" and "Tom" are both there. That is what
prompted my remark.
Why not simply stick to the point? Care to tell us why you believe the
collapse of
WTC7 isn't explained by "officialdom"?
No, I will not. You are right about everything. I bow to your supreme
intellect and your boundless knowlege. I should known better than to
have doubted you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
21 Oct 2005 12:57:49 PM |
|
|
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129906921.572951.290860@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
tw wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129814787.839877.294410@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Tom wrote:
The answer is "yes". You sure have a lot of different screen
names.
Two is a lot? (hardly ecver use teh google groups one now)
Do others post to Google newsgroups from your e-mail address?
Seeing as isn't a valid email address, I expect so.
When I run "find messages by this author" at least half a dozen
screen
names
show up in the response. "tw" and "Tom" are both there. That is what
prompted my remark.
Why not simply stick to the point? Care to tell us why you believe the
collapse of
WTC7 isn't explained by "officialdom"?
No, I will not. You are right about everything.
Temper temper.
I bow to your supreme intellect and your boundless knowlege.
Itäs not me you're arguing with chumpy, it's every structural engineer in
teh US with a clue..
I should known better than to have doubted you.
You shodul have know better than to make ***** statements and then get
all sulky when they're challenged.
.
|
|
|
| User: "goozlefotz" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
26 Oct 2005 06:21:58 PM |
|
|
Tom wrote:
It=E4s not me you're arguing with chumpy, it's every structural engineer =
in
teh US with a clue..
Your list of qualifiers gets longer. First it was "engineers", then it
was "structural engineers" and now it is "structural engineers in the
US with a clue". Of course, your definition of those "in the US with a
clue" is those who agree with the government report, so you cannot
fail.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
27 Oct 2005 06:02:08 AM |
|
|
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1130368918.305449.309060@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Tom wrote:
Itäs not me you're arguing with chumpy, it's every structural engineer
in
teh US with a clue..
Your list of qualifiers gets longer.
Hardly. Or do you think e.g. central heating engineers would be good
sources? *snigger*
First it was "engineers", then it as "structural engineers" and now it is
"structural engineers in the
US with a clue". Of course, your definition of those "in the US with a
clue" is those who agree with the government report, so you cannot
fail.
OK, find ONE registered structural engineer who has written an article in a
peer-reviewed journal where he expressethe opinion that the WTC was brought
down by anything other than being hit by aircraft full of fuel.
Bet you can't!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "goozlefotz" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
21 Oct 2005 01:15:29 PM |
|
|
Tom wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129906921.572951.290860@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
tw wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129814787.839877.294410@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Tom wrote:
The answer is "yes". You sure have a lot of different screen
names.
Two is a lot? (hardly ecver use teh google groups one now)
Do others post to Google newsgroups from your e-mail address?
Seeing as isn't a valid email address, I expect so.
When I run "find messages by this author" at least half a dozen
screen
names
show up in the response. "tw" and "Tom" are both there. That is w=
hat
prompted my remark.
Why not simply stick to the point? Care to tell us why you believe the
collapse of
WTC7 isn't explained by "officialdom"?
No, I will not. You are right about everything.
Temper temper.
I bow to your supreme intellect and your boundless knowlege.
It=E4s not me you're arguing with chumpy, it's every structural engineer =
in
teh US with a clue..
I should known better than to have doubted you.
You shodul have know better than to make ***** statements and then get
all sulky when they're challenged.
Of course, how silly of me. You see, when I run into an ***** on
these groups, I simply refuse to deal with him/her. Somehow, I
mistakenly took you for one of those assholes. Now that I know better,
I will never disagree with you again. Do you think I should surrender
my PE license for having made such a mistake?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
22 Oct 2005 12:59:02 PM |
|
|
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129918529.796311.202930@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Tom wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129906921.572951.290860@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
tw wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129814787.839877.294410@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Tom wrote:
The answer is "yes". You sure have a lot of different screen
names.
Two is a lot? (hardly ecver use teh google groups one now)
Do others post to Google newsgroups from your e-mail address?
Seeing as isn't a valid email address, I expect so.
When I run "find messages by this author" at least half a dozen
screen
names
show up in the response. "tw" and "Tom" are both there. That is
what
prompted my remark.
Why not simply stick to the point? Care to tell us why you believe the
collapse of
WTC7 isn't explained by "officialdom"?
No, I will not. You are right about everything.
Temper temper.
I bow to your supreme intellect and your boundless knowlege.
Itäs not me you're arguing with chumpy, it's every structural engineer in
teh US with a clue..
I should known better than to have doubted you.
You shodul have know better than to make ***** statements and then get
all sulky when they're challenged.
Of course, how silly of me. You see, when I run into an ***** on
these groups, I simply refuse to deal with him/her. Somehow, I
mistakenly took you for one of those assholes. Now that I know better,
I will never disagree with you again. Do you think I should surrender
my PE license for having made such a mistake?
If you have a PE license in sturtural engineering you shoudl turn it in
because you're too fucking incompetent to understand how teh WTC came down..
HTH! HAND
.
|
|
|
| User: "goozlefotz" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
22 Oct 2005 01:13:09 PM |
|
|
Tom wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129918529.796311.202930@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Tom wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129906921.572951.290860@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
tw wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129814787.839877.294410@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Tom wrote:
The answer is "yes". You sure have a lot of different screen
names.
Two is a lot? (hardly ecver use teh google groups one now)
Do others post to Google newsgroups from your e-mail address?
Seeing as isn't a valid email address, I expect so.
When I run "find messages by this author" at least half a dozen
screen
names
show up in the response. "tw" and "Tom" are both there. That is
what
prompted my remark.
Why not simply stick to the point? Care to tell us why you believe =
the
collapse of
WTC7 isn't explained by "officialdom"?
No, I will not. You are right about everything.
Temper temper.
I bow to your supreme intellect and your boundless knowlege.
It=E4s not me you're arguing with chumpy, it's every structural enginee=
r in
teh US with a clue..
I should known better than to have doubted you.
You shodul have know better than to make ***** statements and then g=
et
all sulky when they're challenged.
Of course, how silly of me. You see, when I run into an ***** on
these groups, I simply refuse to deal with him/her. Somehow, I
mistakenly took you for one of those assholes. Now that I know better,
I will never disagree with you again. Do you think I should surrender
my PE license for having made such a mistake?
If you have a PE license in sturtural engineering you shoudl turn it in
because you're too fucking incompetent to understand how teh WTC came dow=
n=2E.
HTH! HAND
I'll do that right away! I see you still don't know how to talk
without using four letter words. Usually, that is a sign of illiteracy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
23 Oct 2005 04:56:21 AM |
|
|
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1130004789.517889.48370@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Tom wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129918529.796311.202930@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Tom wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129906921.572951.290860@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
tw wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129814787.839877.294410@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Tom wrote:
The answer is "yes". You sure have a lot of different screen
names.
Two is a lot? (hardly ecver use teh google groups one now)
Do others post to Google newsgroups from your e-mail address?
Seeing as isn't a valid email address, I expect so.
When I run "find messages by this author" at least half a dozen
screen
names
show up in the response. "tw" and "Tom" are both there. That is
what
prompted my remark.
Why not simply stick to the point? Care to tell us why you believe
the
collapse of
WTC7 isn't explained by "officialdom"?
No, I will not. You are right about everything.
Temper temper.
I bow to your supreme intellect and your boundless knowlege.
Itäs not me you're arguing with chumpy, it's every structural engineer
in
teh US with a clue..
I should known better than to have doubted you.
You shodul have know better than to make ***** statements and then
get
all sulky when they're challenged.
Of course, how silly of me. You see, when I run into an ***** on
these groups, I simply refuse to deal with him/her. Somehow, I
mistakenly took you for one of those assholes. Now that I know better,
I will never disagree with you again. Do you think I should surrender
my PE license for having made such a mistake?
If you have a PE license in sturtural engineering you shoudl turn it in
because you're too fucking incompetent to understand how teh WTC came
down..
HTH! HAND
I'll do that right away!
It woudl be the only honest thing to do. If you had one in the first place,
which is very doubtfull.
I see you still don't know how to talkwithout using four letter words.
Usually, that is a sign of illiteracy.
No it isn't. .However, statements like yours above are definit e proof that
you are too fucking stupid to argue your case, which is why you've spent
this entire thread running away from it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "goozlefotz" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
26 Oct 2005 06:16:02 PM |
|
|
Tom wrote:
No it isn't. .However, statements like yours above are definit e proof that
you are too fucking stupid to argue your case, which is why you've spent
this entire thread running away from it.
I'm glad to see that you have learned how not to be "rude and crude"...
Or is that "arrogant", "belligerant" and "illiterate"?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "goozlefotz" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
23 Oct 2005 10:46:31 AM |
|
|
Tom wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1130004789.517889.48370@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Tom wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129918529.796311.202930@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Tom wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129906921.572951.290860@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
tw wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129814787.839877.294410@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Tom wrote:
The answer is "yes". You sure have a lot of different scre=
en
names.
Two is a lot? (hardly ecver use teh google groups one now)
Do others post to Google newsgroups from your e-mail address?
Seeing as isn't a valid email address, I expect so.
When I run "find messages by this author" at least half a dozen
screen
names
show up in the response. "tw" and "Tom" are both there. That =
is
what
prompted my remark.
Why not simply stick to the point? Care to tell us why you believe
the
collapse of
WTC7 isn't explained by "officialdom"?
No, I will not. You are right about everything.
Temper temper.
I bow to your supreme intellect and your boundless knowlege.
It=E4s not me you're arguing with chumpy, it's every structural engin=
eer
in
teh US with a clue..
I should known better than to have doubted you.
You shodul have know better than to make ***** statements and then
get
all sulky when they're challenged.
Of course, how silly of me. You see, when I run into an ***** on
these groups, I simply refuse to deal with him/her. Somehow, I
mistakenly took you for one of those assholes. Now that I know bette=
r,
I will never disagree with you again. Do you think I should surrender
my PE license for having made such a mistake?
If you have a PE license in sturtural engineering you shoudl turn it in
because you're too fucking incompetent to understand how teh WTC came
down..
HTH! HAND
I'll do that right away!
It woudl be the only honest thing to do. If you had one in the first plac=
e,
which is very doubtfull.
I see you still don't know how to talkwithout using four letter words.
Usually, that is a sign of illiteracy.
No it isn't. .However, statements like yours above are definit e proof th=
at
you are too fucking stupid to argue your case, which is why you've spent
this entire thread running away from it.
Whatever you say...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "goozlefotz" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
18 Oct 2005 06:37:26 PM |
|
|
Tom wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129659708.489954.325780@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
tw wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129597141.322267.19160@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Talking of idiocy, are you still running from this?
"Your "everyone else" does not include me. I am a registered
professional engineer and could have signed off on the design drawings
for those buildings. I definitely do not accept the official version
of the collapses. Remember, for example, that the smaller building
(7?) collapsed also even though it was never hit. "
You must be mistaken, the paragraph in quotation marks is your own writing.
The paragraph in quotes was definitely written by me. Where did I say
that it wasn't?
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
19 Oct 2005 02:45:16 AM |
|
|
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129678646.814854.104380@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Tom wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129659708.489954.325780@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
tw wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129597141.322267.19160@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Talking of idiocy, are you still running from this?
"Your "everyone else" does not include me. I am a registered
professional engineer and could have signed off on the design
drawings
for those buildings. I definitely do not accept the official
version
of the collapses. Remember, for example, that the smaller building
(7?) collapsed also even though it was never hit. "
I looked back through your posts to see if you are always this rude
and
crude.
You must be mistaken, the paragraph in quotation marks is your own
writing.
The paragraph in quotes was definitely written by me. Where did I say
that it wasn't?
Well, seeing as it was the only rude, crude thing in the original post it
simply HAD to be what you were referring to.
Being a "professional engineer" (as you claim - what field of engineering,
BTW?) , have you come up with a good structural engineering reason to
support your position? Or are you just going to run away, throwing
irrelevant quotes from unqualified people behind you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "goozlefotz" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
19 Oct 2005 11:50:32 AM |
|
|
tw wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129678646.814854.104380@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Tom wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129659708.489954.325780@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
tw wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129597141.322267.19160@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Talking of idiocy, are you still running from this?
"Your "everyone else" does not include me. I am a registered
professional engineer and could have signed off on the design
drawings
for those buildings. I definitely do not accept the official
version
of the collapses. Remember, for example, that the smaller building
(7?) collapsed also even though it was never hit. "
I looked back through your posts to see if you are always this rude
and
crude.
You must be mistaken, the paragraph in quotation marks is your own
writing.
The paragraph in quotes was definitely written by me. Where did I say
that it wasn't?
Well, seeing as it was the only rude, crude thing in the original post it
simply HAD to be what you were referring to.
Being a "professional engineer" (as you claim - what field of engineering,
BTW?) , have you come up with a good structural engineering reason to
support your position? Or are you just going to run away, throwing
irrelevant quotes from unqualified people behind you?
I was trying to find your old post where you said something like that I
was the only one who didn't accept the official story. I never found
it, but my C&P's (and I could do more all day long) were to refute that
statement. Of course, as usual, you get to decide who is qualified and
what is relevant. It was while I was looking through your old posts
that I saw the long list of screen names. If you want to verify what I
say, go to "options" on one of your posts and hit "find messages by
this author". Google does it by e-mail address, not screen name, and
there are a bunch of them.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
20 Oct 2005 02:12:32 AM |
|
|
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129740632.771432.141230@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
tw wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129678646.814854.104380@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Tom wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129659708.489954.325780@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
tw wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129597141.322267.19160@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Talking of idiocy, are you still running from this?
"Your "everyone else" does not include me. I am a registered
professional engineer and could have signed off on the design
drawings
for those buildings. I definitely do not accept the official
version
of the collapses. Remember, for example, that the smaller
building
(7?) collapsed also even though it was never hit. "
I looked back through your posts to see if you are always this
rude
and
crude.
You must be mistaken, the paragraph in quotation marks is your own
writing.
The paragraph in quotes was definitely written by me. Where did I say
that it wasn't?
Well, seeing as it was the only rude, crude thing in the original post
it
simply HAD to be what you were referring to.
Being a "professional engineer" (as you claim - what field of
engineering,
BTW?) , have you come up with a good structural engineering reason to
support your position? Or are you just going to run away, throwing
irrelevant quotes from unqualified people behind you?
I was trying to find your old post where you said something like that I
was the only one who didn't accept the official story. I never found
it, but my C&P's (and I could do more all day long) were to refute that
statement. Of course, as usual, you get to decide who is qualified and
what is relevant. It was while I was looking through your old posts
that I saw the long list of screen names. If you want to verify what I
say, go to "options" on one of your posts and hit "find messages by
this author". Google does it by e-mail address, not screen name, and
there are a bunch of them.
Why are you dancing around the issue of backing up your statements about the
WTC? Not feeling confident?
.
|
|
|
| User: "goozlefotz" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
20 Oct 2005 08:54:47 AM |
|
|
tw wrote:
Why are you dancing around the issue of backing up your statements about the
WTC? Not feeling confident?
I stated an opinion. I showed that many others share my opinion, and
that therefore it is not "outrageous". Since you know that I cannot
PROVE that my opinion is valid, and I know that you know it, I am not
going to play your game of arguing which is true and which isn't. That
could go on forever. I do not understand your remark about "Not
feeling confident". Confident about what? I am confident that it is
my opinion and am comfortable with it. Why don't you try proving that
the official version is correct?
I do applaud your skill and abilities in the "baiting" department.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
20 Oct 2005 09:11:59 AM |
|
|
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129816487.415259.158410@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
tw wrote:
Why are you dancing around the issue of backing up your statements about
the
WTC? Not feeling confident?
I stated an opinion.
Uh huh. You know what they say about opinoins.
I showed that many others share my opinion, and
that therefore it is not "outrageous".
Logical fallacy. Plenty of people opine e.g. that it's OK to kill people not
of their religion. That many of them hold this opiniondoesn't stopit from
being "outrageous".
The "plenty of people" who share your opinion don't knwo what they'r eon
about, as shown by the unmitigated nonsense spewed in your quotation from
David Ray Griffin. He bases his conclusions on false premises, but
apparently you were unable to spot that, which is probably why you're
avoiding that thread like the plague.
Since you know that I cannot PROVE that my opinion is valid, and I know
that you know it, I am not
going to play your game of arguing which is true and which isn't.
You're not even going to back your opinion up with anything resembling a
fact or a cite...
That could go on forever. I do not understand your remark about "Not
feeling confident". Confident about what? I am confident that it is
my opinion and am comfortable with it.
Even though it's apparently based on blatant falsehoods like those spewed by
Griffin?
Why don't you try proving that
the official version is correct?
There is no need. It has appeared in a number of peer-reviewed journals and
no structural engineers are leaping over themselves to say it's impossible
or incorrect.
I do applaud your skill and abilities in the "baiting" department.
Jolly good.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "goozlefotz" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
18 Oct 2005 01:59:29 PM |
|
|
tw wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129597141.322267.19160@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
InquiringMind wrote:
Idiots shouldn't be allowed to have opinions. They have no clue what
they
are talking about.
And, of course, you get to decide who is an idiot and who is not.
Talking of idiocy, are you still running from this?
"Your "everyone else" does not include me. I am a registered
professional engineer and could have signed off on the design drawings
for those buildings. I definitely do not accept the official version
of the collapses. Remember, for example, that the smaller building
(7?) collapsed also even though it was never hit. "
WIKIPEDIA:
In a letter to Frank Gayle of the National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST), Kevin Ryan of Underwriters Laboratories, wrote "This
story just does not add up. If steel from those buildings did soften or
melt, I'm sure we can all agree that this was certainly not due to
jet fuel fires of any kind, let alone the briefly burning fires in
those towers. That fact should be of great concern to all Americans.
Alternatively, the contention that this steel did fail at temperatures
around 250 =B0C suggests that the majority of deaths on 9/11 were due to
a safety-related failure." Underwriters Laboratories is the company
that certified the steel components used in the construction of the
World Trade Center towers.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "goozlefotz" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
18 Oct 2005 02:05:47 PM |
|
|
tw wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129597141.322267.19160@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
InquiringMind wrote:
Idiots shouldn't be allowed to have opinions. They have no clue what
they
are talking about.
And, of course, you get to decide who is an idiot and who is not.
Talking of idiocy, are you still running from this?
"Your "everyone else" does not include me. I am a registered
professional engineer and could have signed off on the design drawings
for those buildings. I definitely do not accept the official version
of the collapses. Remember, for example, that the smaller building
(7?) collapsed also even though it was never hit. "
Former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Reagan, Paul
Craig Roberts, expressed his doubt about the official 9/11 story in the
following statement: "I know many qualified engineers and scientists
have said the WTC collapsed from explosives. In fact, if you look at
the manner in which it fell, you have to give their conclusions
credibility."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
18 Oct 2005 03:24:14 PM |
|
|
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129662347.157952.242790@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
tw wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129597141.322267.19160@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
InquiringMind wrote:
Idiots shouldn't be allowed to have opinions. They have no clue what
they
are talking about.
And, of course, you get to decide who is an idiot and who is not.
Talking of idiocy, are you still running from this?
"Your "everyone else" does not include me. I am a registered
professional engineer and could have signed off on the design drawings
for those buildings. I definitely do not accept the official version
of the collapses. Remember, for example, that the smaller building
(7?) collapsed also even though it was never hit. "
Former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Reagan, Paul
Craig Roberts,
What are his credentials in structural engineering?
expressed his doubt about the official 9/11 story in the
following statement: "I know many qualified engineers and scientists
have said the WTC collapsed from explosives. In fact, if you look at
the manner in which it fell, you have to give their conclusions
credibility."
Nice and vague. Does he name any of these engineers? Itäs just that, you see
the collapse doesn't seem to be challenged by any peer-reviewed engineering
publications.
You claim to be a structural engineer yourself - can you give any erason why
you believe the WTC was brought down by explosives?
.
|
|
|
| User: "goozlefotz" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
19 Oct 2005 02:02:25 PM |
|
|
Tom wrote:
What are his credentials in structural engineering?
What are yours?
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
20 Oct 2005 02:11:22 AM |
|
|
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129748545.376728.217150@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Tom wrote:
What are his credentials in structural engineering?
What are yours?
I'm not the one making outrageous claims.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "goozlefotz" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
27 Oct 2005 10:16:10 AM |
|
|
Tom wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129662347.157952.242790@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
tw wrote:
"goozlefotz" <granteer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129597141.322267.19160@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
InquiringMind wrote:
Idiots shouldn't be allowed to have opinions. They have no clue w=
hat
they
are talking about.
And, of course, you get to decide who is an idiot and who is not.
Talking of idiocy, are you still running from this?
"Your "everyone else" does not include me. I am a registered
professional engineer and could have signed off on the design drawings
for those buildings. I definitely do not accept the official version
of the collapses. Remember, for example, that the smaller building
(7?) collapsed also even though it was never hit. "
Former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Reagan, Paul
Craig Roberts,
What are his credentials in structural engineering?
expressed his doubt about the official 9/11 story in the
following statement: "I know many qualified engineers and scientists
have said the WTC collapsed from explosives. In fact, if you look at
the manner in which it fell, you have to give their conclusions
credibility."
Nice and vague. Does he name any of these engineers? It=E4s just that, yo=
u see
the collapse doesn't seem to be challenged by any peer-reviewed engineeri=
ng
publications.
You claim to be a structural engineer yourself - can you give any erason =
why
you believe the WTC was brought down by explosives?
If you want to accuse me of something, make it something I actually
said, please.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "goozlefotz" |
|
| Title: Re: Get the fuckers! |
19 Oct 2005 02:14:30 PM |
|
|
Why do you switch screen names from "tw" to "Tom" and back again?
Here is a little lesson on human behavior: When a person acts arrogant
and belligerant, it is a sure sign of low self esteem. The constant
put-downs of others is necessary to such a person because, not really
believing that they themselves have any value, they must try to build
themselves up by pulling others down. Such people are to be pitied,
because the only way they can grow is to accept themselves as they are,
and they usually do not have enough guts to do that.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
