Here's the proof (as if any was needed).
Dani has lied and said that when she inquired about
someone who had not been posting, that she was not
looking for me, but for Grantland, what a laugh.
Now in this post dated 2004-10-24 00:59:15 PST
Grantland posted to the group:
From: (Grantland)
Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
Subject: Visceral Hatred
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 08:01:23 GMT
Organization: opinions international etc.
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <4172265a.489395793@ct-news.iafrica.com>
Reply-To:
NNTP-Posting-Host: wbs-210-32.telkomadsl.co.za
X-Trace: ctb-nnrp2.saix.net 1098604753 8637 165.165.210.32 (24 Oct 2004
07:59:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Oct 2004 07:59:13 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
soooo tired from shrieking at teh tv.. AAAAAAARGGGGGGGHHHHHHH!!!
G
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Three people followed up to Grantlands post, so even if for some bizarre reason
Dani couldn't see his post, she would have seen the follow-ups from:
Leigh_Bee (leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au)
Jean Guernon (jguernon@globetrotter.net)
tw (no@no.com)
But she is a liar, so:
24hrs later Dani posted with her inquirey:
From: Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
Subject: Question (don't laugh)..
Message-ID: <7k8pn01s1kdue5fqq4g51c05dobvcbtsjh@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.92/32.572
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 13
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.30.123.155
X-Complaints-To:
X-Trace: attbi_s01 1098687550 66.30.123.155 (Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 GMT
I've never kill-filed anyone so I don't know much about it.
My question is:
If someone kill-files me, does that mean that I also cannot see
*their* posts? I know they no longer see mine.. but I've noticed that
a certain someone (no mentioning names) is no longer appearing on my
newsreader and I never kill-filed him. Does it work both ways? If
someone kill-files me - do I also no longer see his/her posts?
Thank you.
Dani
__________________________________________________________
proving that she is a LIAR, and that those who have
come to her aid in this are also Liars, namely Tommy Boy
and Amy. Woods and Shasta have enough common sense,
and common good to see through the lies.
Dani, proven once again to be a LIAR.
Tony
.
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
10 Nov 2004 08:26:36 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041110092210.12272.00000584@mb-m28.aol.com...
Here's the proof (as if any was needed).
Dani has lied and said that when she inquired about
someone who had not been posting, that she was not
looking for me, but for Grantland, what a laugh.
Now in this post dated 2004-10-24 00:59:15 PST
Grantland posted to the group:
From: (Grantland)
Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
Subject: Visceral Hatred
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 08:01:23 GMT
Organization: opinions international etc.
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <4172265a.489395793@ct-news.iafrica.com>
Reply-To:
NNTP-Posting-Host: wbs-210-32.telkomadsl.co.za
X-Trace: ctb-nnrp2.saix.net 1098604753 8637 165.165.210.32 (24 Oct 2004
07:59:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Oct 2004 07:59:13 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
soooo tired from shrieking at teh tv.. AAAAAAARGGGGGGGHHHHHHH!!!
G
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Three people followed up to Grantlands post, so even if for some bizarre
reason
Dani couldn't see his post, she would have seen the follow-ups from:
Leigh_Bee (leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au)
Jean Guernon (jguernon@globetrotter.net)
tw (no@no.com)
But she is a liar, so:
24hrs later Dani posted with her inquirey:
From: Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
Subject: Question (don't laugh)..
Message-ID: <7k8pn01s1kdue5fqq4g51c05dobvcbtsjh@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.92/32.572
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 13
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.30.123.155
X-Complaints-To:
X-Trace: attbi_s01 1098687550 66.30.123.155 (Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10
GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 GMT
I've never kill-filed anyone so I don't know much about it.
My question is:
If someone kill-files me, does that mean that I also cannot see
*their* posts? I know they no longer see mine.. but I've noticed that
a certain someone (no mentioning names) is no longer appearing on my
newsreader and I never kill-filed him. Does it work both ways? If
someone kill-files me - do I also no longer see his/her posts?
Thank you.
Dani
__________________________________________________________
proving that she is a LIAR, and that those who have
come to her aid in this are also Liars, namely Tommy Boy
and Amy. Woods and Shasta have enough common sense,
and common good to see through the lies.
Dani, proven once again to be a LIAR.
Tony, proven once again to be an obsessed fucking weirdo, more like...
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
10 Nov 2004 08:47:20 AM |
|
|
"tw"
wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041110092210.12272.00000584@mb-m28.aol.com...
Here's the proof (as if any was needed).
Dani has lied and said that when she inquired about
someone who had not been posting, that she was not
looking for me, but for Grantland, what a laugh.
Now in this post dated 2004-10-24 00:59:15 PST
Grantland posted to the group:
From: (Grantland)
Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
Subject: Visceral Hatred
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 08:01:23 GMT
Organization: opinions international etc.
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <4172265a.489395793@ct-news.iafrica.com>
Reply-To:
NNTP-Posting-Host: wbs-210-32.telkomadsl.co.za
X-Trace: ctb-nnrp2.saix.net 1098604753 8637 165.165.210.32 (24 Oct 2004
07:59:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Oct 2004 07:59:13 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
soooo tired from shrieking at teh tv.. AAAAAAARGGGGGGGHHHHHHH!!!
G
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Three people followed up to Grantlands post, so even if for some bizarre
reason
Dani couldn't see his post, she would have seen the follow-ups from:
Leigh_Bee (leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au)
Jean Guernon (jguernon@globetrotter.net)
tw ( )
But she is a liar, so:
24hrs later Dani posted with her inquirey:
From: Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
Subject: Question (don't laugh)..
Message-ID: <7k8pn01s1kdue5fqq4g51c05dobvcbtsjh@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.92/32.572
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 13
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.30.123.155
X-Complaints-To:
X-Trace: attbi_s01 1098687550 66.30.123.155 (Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10
GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 GMT
I've never kill-filed anyone so I don't know much about it.
My question is:
If someone kill-files me, does that mean that I also cannot see
*their* posts? I know they no longer see mine.. but I've noticed that
a certain someone (no mentioning names) is no longer appearing on my
newsreader and I never kill-filed him. Does it work both ways? If
someone kill-files me - do I also no longer see his/her posts?
Thank you.
Dani
__________________________________________________________
proving that she is a LIAR, and that those who have
come to her aid in this are also Liars, namely Tommy Boy
and Amy. Woods and Shasta have enough common sense,
and common good to see through the lies.
Dani, proven once again to be a LIAR.
Tony, proven once again to be an >obsessed fucking weirdo, more like...
Wrong, Clown, it proves that she is what I have always known her to be, a lfat
out LIAR who will say anything to make herself look good.
The proof is there for all to see, how did she miss his post and several
replies to his post if she was looking for him?
LOL!!!
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
10 Nov 2004 09:31:40 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041110094720.12369.00000396@mb-m28.aol.com...
"tw"
wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041110092210.12272.00000584@mb-m28.aol.com...
Here's the proof (as if any was needed).
Dani has lied and said that when she inquired about
someone who had not been posting, that she was not
looking for me, but for Grantland, what a laugh.
Now in this post dated 2004-10-24 00:59:15 PST
Grantland posted to the group:
From: (Grantland)
Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
Subject: Visceral Hatred
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 08:01:23 GMT
Organization: opinions international etc.
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <4172265a.489395793@ct-news.iafrica.com>
Reply-To:
NNTP-Posting-Host: wbs-210-32.telkomadsl.co.za
X-Trace: ctb-nnrp2.saix.net 1098604753 8637 165.165.210.32 (24 Oct 2004
07:59:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Oct 2004 07:59:13 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
soooo tired from shrieking at teh tv.. AAAAAAARGGGGGGGHHHHHHH!!!
G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-------------------------------------
Three people followed up to Grantlands post, so even if for some
bizarre
reason
Dani couldn't see his post, she would have seen the follow-ups from:
Leigh_Bee (leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au)
Jean Guernon (jguernon@globetrotter.net)
tw ( )
But she is a liar, so:
24hrs later Dani posted with her inquirey:
From: Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
Subject: Question (don't laugh)..
Message-ID: <7k8pn01s1kdue5fqq4g51c05dobvcbtsjh@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.92/32.572
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 13
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.30.123.155
X-Complaints-To:
X-Trace: attbi_s01 1098687550 66.30.123.155 (Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10
GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 GMT
I've never kill-filed anyone so I don't know much about it.
My question is:
If someone kill-files me, does that mean that I also cannot see
*their* posts? I know they no longer see mine.. but I've noticed that
a certain someone (no mentioning names) is no longer appearing on my
newsreader and I never kill-filed him. Does it work both ways? If
someone kill-files me - do I also no longer see his/her posts?
Thank you.
Dani
__________________________________________________________
proving that she is a LIAR, and that those who have
come to her aid in this are also Liars, namely Tommy Boy
and Amy. Woods and Shasta have enough common sense,
and common good to see through the lies.
Dani, proven once again to be a LIAR.
Tony, proven once again to be an >obsessed fucking weirdo, more like...
Wrong, Clown,
Nope. competely right, you fuicking wackjob! Where does ANYONE apart from
you take this as evidence she was "looking for you"?!
it proves that she is what I have always known her to be, a lfat
out LIAR who will say anything to make herself look good.
Oh, you mean like someone who'd make up posts to drug newsgroups, eh
YoMousey? LOL
The proof is there for all to see, how did she miss his post and several
replies to his post if she was looking for him?
Tony, I know you are incredibly stupid so I'll explain to you.
1) Dani. for whatever reason, wasn't seeing Grantland's posts when they were
posted, she was only seeing them as people replied.
2) Puzzled by this, she asked the group about how killfiles work, presumably
because she thought that if G had killfiled HER then there was a possibility
that SHE wouldn't see his posts.
3) You take this to be here LOOKING FOR YOU! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Talk about
obsessed! Even if she DID mean you and not Grantland, all she was saying was
she hadn't seen you post for a while, it could only mean she was looking for
you if you were a steroid crazed obsessed wacko..
LOL!!!
Double LOL! ROFLOL!
If you haven't got it by now, there really is no point explaining it to you
any further is there`?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
10 Nov 2004 09:47:42 AM |
|
|
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote:
<..>
Very sad. sad sad sad... and Dubdub is very similar if not worse.
Moronic, alien and ugly. The Beast, and his minions.
Grantland
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
10 Nov 2004 10:10:30 AM |
|
|
"tw"
wrote:
I'll explain to you.
1) Dani. for whatever reason, wasn't seeing Grantland's posts when they were
posted, she was only seeing them as >people replied.
Wrong.
As I pointed out, there were 3 replies to Grantland in the 24 hours before Dani
made her request, did she miss all of those too? Nope, and why would she not
want to mention his name? He's her buddy.
You're brain dead Tommy Boy, not only that, you've once again been exposed as a
LIAR.
Anyone with an ounce of common sense can now see the proof that I have provided
that proves that Dani has lied again.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Barbarossa" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
10 Nov 2004 12:45:54 PM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> schreef in bericht
news:20041110111030.12369.00000401@mb-m28.aol.com...
"tw"
wrote:
I'll explain to you.
1) Dani. for whatever reason, wasn't seeing Grantland's posts when they
were
posted, she was only seeing them as >people replied.
Wrong.
Nope, you are wrong here. Dani for some reason could not read the replies
of Grantland. And she could have easily missed that entire further thread.
It
happens at my newsserver as well that not all threads popup here. Or in some
cases only parts of threads show up.
When her thread where she asked about killfiles apparently did not get her
the answer she needed she even started a new thread. In this new thread she
asked Grantland to do something about his/her mailfolder, because an email
she send to him/her got bounced. She got it back with specific details about
Grantland's email address. She tried to email him/her, but her emails got
bounced. Reason for this bouncing was that Grantland's emailfolder was
overloaded. She asked Grantland in the same message in the same thread to
delete some messages from his mailfolder. Almost all newsservers have a
certain limitation on the messages they are willing to receive. This is done
to safe storeageroom on servers.
As I pointed out, there were 3 replies to Grantland in the 24 hours
before Dani
made her request, did she miss all of those too? Nope, and why would she
not
want to mention his name? He's her buddy.
You're brain dead Tommy Boy, not only that, you've once again been exposed
as a
LIAR.
Anyone with an ounce of common sense can now see the proof that I have
provided
that proves that Dani has lied again.
You jump to this conclusion way too soon and you have proven nothing.
Kind Regards,
Barbarossa
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
10 Nov 2004 10:19:31 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041110111030.12369.00000401@mb-m28.aol.com...
"tw"
wrote:
I'll explain to you.
1) Dani. for whatever reason, wasn't seeing Grantland's posts when they
were
posted, she was only seeing them as >people replied.
Wrong.
Nope. not at all. YOu fucking wack job
As I pointed out, there were 3 replies to Grantland in the 24 hours before
Dani
made her request, did she miss all of those too? Nope, and why would she
not
want to mention his name? He's her buddy.
As I said, if you need it explained again, there really is no way I can get
you to understand it.
Keep on pissing in the wind Tony, you strippied yourself of credibilty
looong ago.
http://tinyurl.com/3nngp
"YoMousey" <yomousey@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20001025120559.09216.00001878@ng-bh1.aol.com...
drugstorecowboy@my-deja.com
wrote:
yomousey@aol.com (YoMousey) wrote:
What is the going price for Oxcodone 40mg tab on the street?
What about 5mg quick acting Oxycodone?
Thanks.
The rule is usually $1 per milligram. >That's $40 for you my friend.
Wow!
That much? I'm sitting on 200 of these jokers. Thanks for the info.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
10 Nov 2004 04:40:54 PM |
|
|
In article <20041110111030.12369.00000401@mb-m28.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
"tw"
wrote:
I'll explain to you.
1) Dani. for whatever reason, wasn't seeing Grantland's posts when they were
posted, she was only seeing them as >people replied.
Wrong.
As I pointed out, there were 3 replies to Grantland in the 24 hours before Dani
<snip>
All during a time when you were, ostensibly, not bothering with APN. Are you
perhaps stalking Dani electronically? You are clearly obsessed with her, which
tends to lend credence to her previous claims. Your best bet is to just
killfile her and leave her alone. Of course, everyone besides you know that you
aren't capable of that because she's your obsession ....
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
11 Nov 2004 09:47:09 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
"tw"
wrote:
I'll explain to you.
1) Dani. for whatever reason, wasn't seeing Grantland's posts when they
were
posted, she was only seeing them as >people replied.
Wrong.
As I pointed out, there were 3 replies to Grantland in the 24 hours before
Dani
<snip>
All during a time when you were, >ostensibly, not bothering with APN. Are
you perhaps stalking Dani >electronically?
LOL!!! No, but I know of at least 2 people here who have beeing do this to me
for a few years, but that doesn't bother you, does it?
You are clearly obsessed with her,
She mentions me during my absence and I'm the one who is obsessed?
which
tends to lend credence to her previous claims. Your best bet is to just
killfile her and leave her alone. Of course, everyone besides you know that
you aren't capable of that because she's >your obsession ....
Woods
Gee Sandy, why do you not suggest that she killfile me and stop posting about
me? Afriad she'll wig out on you? ;-)
Also, as I pointed out, you're first inclination was to suspect that Dani was
looking for me, so why do you now come forth with this BS?
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
11 Nov 2004 04:49:27 PM |
|
|
In article <20041111104709.08198.00000492@mb-m04.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
"tw"
wrote:
I'll explain to you.
1) Dani. for whatever reason, wasn't seeing Grantland's posts when they
were
posted, she was only seeing them as >people replied.
Wrong.
As I pointed out, there were 3 replies to Grantland in the 24 hours before
Dani
<snip>
All during a time when you were, >ostensibly, not bothering with APN. Are
you perhaps stalking Dani >electronically?
LOL!!! No, but I know of at least 2 people here who have beeing do this to me
for a few years, but that doesn't bother you, does it?
Nope. After going out of your way to be obnoxious, self-righteous and
hypocritical right here on APN, it's small wonder that you'd get one or two
people disgusted enough to point your hypocrisy right to your face. Which, BTW,
you are still in denial about.
You are clearly obsessed with her,
She mentions me during my absence and I'm the one who is obsessed?
which
tends to lend credence to her previous claims. Your best bet is to just
killfile her and leave her alone. Of course, everyone besides you know that
you aren't capable of that because she's >your obsession ....
Woods
Gee Sandy, why do you not suggest that she killfile me and stop posting about
me? Afriad she'll wig out on you? ;-)
Also, as I pointed out, you're first inclination was to suspect that Dani was
looking for me, so why do you now come forth with this BS?
It never even entered my head that Dani "was looking for" you. I merely thought
that she was probably considering herself far too lucky to have you actually
gone from the group to believe her good fortune.
Your comments, above, indicate that you are completely out of touch with how
your actions look on the other side of the screen.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
12 Nov 2004 08:00:02 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
LOL!!! No, but I know of at least 2 >>people here who have beeing do this to
me for a few years, but that doesn't >>bother you, does it?
Nope.
So you admit to being a Hypocrite, Like I said, you're a filtier scumbag that I
had imagined.
It never even entered my head that Dani >"was looking for" you
LOL!!! You're a fucking liar on top of being a smelly old hag. If it never
entered your head, why the ***** did you mention it you Menapausal wacko?
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
12 Nov 2004 08:12:55 AM |
|
|
TonyZ2001 wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
LOL!!! No, but I know of at least 2 >>people here who have beeing do this to
me for a few years, but that doesn't >>bother you, does it?
Nope.
So you admit to being a Hypocrite, Like I said, you're a filtier scumbag that I
had imagined.
It never even entered my head that Dani >"was looking for" you
LOL!!! You're a fucking liar on top of being a smelly old hag. If it never
entered your head, why the ***** did you mention it you Menapausal wacko?
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHA
This just gets better and 'betterer'.
Call 911 Tony, your going to need medical assistance soon... either that
or drop some Oxycontin.
-A
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
12 Nov 2004 08:40:13 AM |
|
|
Absolute Zero
wrote:
Call 911 Tony, your going to need >medical assistance soon..
Take a look in the bedroom, wacko.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
12 Nov 2004 08:14:05 AM |
|
|
Wooah! Nice meltdown Tony! You seem to have some real, err, issues with the
female of the species. Tell us about your mother..ziss could be very
interestink..
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041112090002.21753.00000395@mb-m12.aol.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
LOL!!! No, but I know of at least 2 >>people here who have beeing do
this to
me for a few years, but that doesn't >>bother you, does it?
Nope.
So you admit to being a Hypocrite, Like I said, you're a filtier scumbag
that I
had imagined.
It never even entered my head that Dani >"was looking for" you
LOL!!! You're a fucking liar on top of being a smelly old hag. If it
never
entered your head, why the ***** did you mention it you Menapausal wacko?
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
12 Nov 2004 09:01:55 AM |
|
|
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:cn2g8k$4ip$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
Wooah! Nice meltdown Tony! You seem to have some real, err, issues with
the
female of the species.
Maybe that's why he's so obsessed with their clothing?
Tell us about your mother..ziss could be very
interestink..
On second thoughts don't, your dalliance with incest
might prove too much to listen to.
Autistic braindead freak the new religion of trannyz ;0)
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
12 Nov 2004 09:17:42 AM |
|
|
Krib" krib@address.invalid
wrote:
Maybe that's why he's so obsessed with >their clothing?
So Krib, please tell us why you don't like to see women is sexy clothing?
Oh right, he's Gay.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
12 Nov 2004 11:48:53 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041112101742.00325.00000512@mb-m17.aol.com...
Maybe that's why he's so obsessed with >their clothing?
So Krib, please tell us why you don't like to see women is sexy clothing?
There's a difference between like and obsess over, well you should
know that eh trannyz ;0)
Oh right, he's Gay.
Who is, more accurately who cares? you're one of the hypocrites
who can't accept the lifestyle's of others fat tone, but that's because
you're an ignorant know nothing.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
13 Nov 2004 07:44:23 AM |
|
|
"Krib" krib@address.invalid
wrote:
Oh right, he's Gay.
Who is, more accurately who cares? you're one of the hypocrites
who can't accept the lifestyle's of others fat tone, but that's because
you're an ignorant know nothing.
--
krib
Krib finally admits that he's Gay.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
13 Nov 2004 11:27:36 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041113084423.12009.00000549@mb-m16.aol.com...
Oh right, he's Gay.
Who is, more accurately who cares? you're one of the hypocrites
who can't accept the lifestyle's of others fat tone, but that's because
you're an ignorant know nothing.
Krib finally admits that he's Gay.
LOL you have as much trouble with reality as guernon, fat boy, still
you both have histories of drug abuse amongst your similar problems
so maybe I shouldn't be too surprised.
Are you this obsessive over everything lardy? or are you able
to control yourself from time to time? I believe OCD can be
hellish to live with, is that why your old woman keeps coming
home with her underwear undone tone ;0)
Can't blame her, a steroid abuser with all of your problems
can't be any fun to go home to, no wonder she plays away.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
13 Nov 2004 11:47:14 AM |
|
|
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041113084423.12009.00000549@mb-m16.aol.com...
Oh right, he's Gay.
Who is, more accurately who cares? you're one of the hypocrites
who can't accept the lifestyle's of others fat tone, but that's because
you're an ignorant know nothing.
Krib finally admits that he's Gay.
LOL you have as much trouble with reality as guernon, fat boy, still
you both have histories of drug abuse amongst your similar problems
so maybe I shouldn't be too surprised.
Are you this obsessive over everything lardy? or are you able
to control yourself from time to time? I believe OCD can be
hellish to live with, is that why your old woman keeps coming
home with her underwear undone tone ;0)
Can't blame her, a steroid abuser with all of your problems
can't be any fun to go home to, no wonder she plays away.
--
krib
she like to play with its breasts -steroid heavan
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
14 Nov 2004 06:59:03 AM |
|
|
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid>
wrote:
Are you this obsessive over everything >lardy? or are you able
to control yourself from time to time? I >believe OCD can be hellish to live
with
Careful Kribby, you're insulting Dani, and according to her, someone else on
this group.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
14 Nov 2004 10:22:32 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041114075903.09660.00000442@mb-m20.aol.com...
Are you this obsessive over everything >lardy? or are you able
to control yourself from time to time? I >believe OCD can be hellish to
live
with
Careful Kribby, you're insulting Dani, and according to her, someone else
on
this group.
You're too stupid to even follow a simple thread zanowic you're
completely useless, no wonder loida gets so many rug burns you
know nothing about, even your old woman can't stand you ;0)
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
17 Nov 2004 11:33:05 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 16:22:32 GMT, "Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041114075903.09660.00000442@mb-m20.aol.com...
Are you this obsessive over everything >lardy? or are you able
to control yourself from time to time? I >believe OCD can be hellish to
live
with
Careful Kribby, you're insulting Dani, and according to her, someone else
on
this group.
You're too stupid to even follow a simple thread zanowic you're
completely useless, no wonder loida gets so many rug burns you
know nothing about, even your old woman can't stand you ;0)
I don't have OCD, Krib - yet another lie from fat tone. Jane has OCD.
But of course, since she is on the same political side as Tony, he
wouldn't say a word to her.
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
18 Nov 2004 09:05:26 AM |
|
|
Dani
wrote:
I don't have OCD, Krib - yet another lie >from fat tone. Jane has OCD.
But of course, since she is on the same >political side as Tony, he wouldn't
say a >word to her.
Who gave you permission to give out other peoples personal information you
little troll?
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
13 Nov 2004 11:53:08 AM |
|
|
Can't blame her, a steroid abuser with all of your problems
can't be any fun to go home to, no wonder she plays away.
--
krib
don't forget the shrunken testes and the malicious stunted libido.
w`
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
13 Nov 2004 09:09:44 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:48:53 GMT, "Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041112101742.00325.00000512@mb-m17.aol.com...
Maybe that's why he's so obsessed with >their clothing?
So Krib, please tell us why you don't like to see women is sexy clothing?
There's a difference between like and obsess over, well you should
know that eh trannyz ;0)
Oh right, he's Gay.
Who is, more accurately who cares? you're one of the hypocrites
who can't accept the lifestyle's of others fat tone, but that's because
you're an ignorant know nothing.
hehe .. "fat tone" .. ;)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
12 Nov 2004 08:39:42 AM |
|
|
"tw"
wrote:
Wooah! Nice meltdown Tony! You seem >to have some real, err, issues with the
female of the species
Only with obvious bitches.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
12 Nov 2004 04:25:35 PM |
|
|
In article <cn2g8k$4ip$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>, "tw" <no@no.com> wrote:
Wooah! Nice meltdown Tony! You seem to have some real, err, issues with the
female of the species. Tell us about your mother..ziss could be very
interestink..
Heh. Yeah, he's melting, he's melting!
Woods
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041112090002.21753.00000395@mb-m12.aol.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
LOL!!! No, but I know of at least 2 >>people here who have beeing do
this to
me for a few years, but that doesn't >>bother you, does it?
Nope.
So you admit to being a Hypocrite, Like I said, you're a filtier scumbag
that I
had imagined.
It never even entered my head that Dani >"was looking for" you
LOL!!! You're a fucking liar on top of being a smelly old hag. If it
never
entered your head, why the ***** did you mention it you Menapausal wacko?
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Prince Lightwing" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
10 Nov 2004 07:27:07 PM |
|
|
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message news:<20041110092210.12272.00000584@mb-m28.aol.com>...
Here's the proof (as if any was needed).
Dani has lied and said that when she inquired about
someone who had not been posting, that she was not
looking for me, but for Grantland, what a laugh.
Now in this post dated 2004-10-24 00:59:15 PST
Grantland posted to the group:
From: (Grantland)
Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
Subject: Visceral Hatred
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 08:01:23 GMT
Organization: opinions international etc.
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <4172265a.489395793@ct-news.iafrica.com>
Reply-To:
NNTP-Posting-Host: wbs-210-32.telkomadsl.co.za
X-Trace: ctb-nnrp2.saix.net 1098604753 8637 165.165.210.32 (24 Oct 2004
07:59:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Oct 2004 07:59:13 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
soooo tired from shrieking at teh tv.. AAAAAAARGGGGGGGHHHHHHH!!!
G
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Three people followed up to Grantlands post, so even if for some bizarre reason
Dani couldn't see his post, she would have seen the follow-ups from:
Leigh_Bee (leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au)
Jean Guernon (jguernon@globetrotter.net)
tw (no@no.com)
But she is a liar, so:
24hrs later Dani posted with her inquirey:
From: Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
Subject: Question (don't laugh)..
Message-ID: <7k8pn01s1kdue5fqq4g51c05dobvcbtsjh@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.92/32.572
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 13
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.30.123.155
X-Complaints-To:
X-Trace: attbi_s01 1098687550 66.30.123.155 (Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 GMT
I've never kill-filed anyone so I don't know much about it.
My question is:
If someone kill-files me, does that mean that I also cannot see
*their* posts? I know they no longer see mine.. but I've noticed that
a certain someone (no mentioning names) is no longer appearing on my
newsreader and I never kill-filed him. Does it work both ways? If
someone kill-files me - do I also no longer see his/her posts?
Thank you.
Dani
__________________________________________________________
proving that she is a LIAR, and that those who have
come to her aid in this are also Liars, namely Tommy Boy
and Amy. Woods and Shasta have enough common sense,
and common good to see through the lies.
Dani, proven once again to be a LIAR.
Tony
The Elect Wrote:
To *YOU* "Anthony" do *WE* Get The "Unfortunate Privledge" Of Watching
*YOU* Rant And Rave At "A Girl" Again Like The "Megalomaniacal
Performance" *YOU* Provided *US* With Last Summer!!! Since *YOU*
"BELEIVE" That *YOU* Can "Continually *Harass* Others"...
I'll let *YOU* in on a "SECRET", *YOU* "ARE" BEING "WITNESSED" BY
*YOUR* "Guardian Angel" and *YOUR* "Conduct Of Character" is being
*NOTED* In *YOUR* "Book Of Life" All The Time and *WILL BE* CONSIDERED
"UNACCEPTABLE and COMPLETELY UNJUSTIFIABLE" In The "COURT" Of *FINAL*
JUSTICE! Do "I" Make Myself Clear Anthony? For *YOUR* Sake, This
*Message* Had Better Reach That Conscious Understanding *YOU* Possess
To Slander *YOUR* Neighbor With!!!
Do *YOURSELF* and "Everyone Else A Favor" and Put This *Childish*
Conduct Away and *Speak* To *YOUR* Neighbors As *YOU* Would Want To Be
*Spoken* To!!! If *YOU* Cannot "Control" *YOUR* "Physical Being" it
will be "Too Much For *YOU* To Be Responsible For and *YOU* Will
"Forfeit" *YOUR* "Right To It" when the "NEW" Way Of Doing Things
Arrives, Understand?
*THE ELECT* Will "PROVE" To "ANTHONY" That "I DO *NOT* GO AROUND
TELLING LIES" and "THIS TIME" IS "Honestly And Truly" LIKE NO OTHER
For "The Inhabitants Of *HIS* Garden", if *YOU* haven't "Figured Out
*YET* That When The Word Of Lord *GOD* Almighty Gets *INVOKED*
Somebody *IS* IN *BIG* TROUBLE, You *Anthony* Will Have Been Doing
*YOURSELF* "A HUGE DISSERVICE" if *YOU* Haven't Figured Out That
Almighty *GOD* "LIVES" *ETERNALLY* and "Rules *SUPREME* Above *ALL*
Life"!!!
The Elect Also Says... "Do *NOT* Forget To Get *Redemption* For *YOUR*
"SINS", Anthony" or *YOU* "WILL BE" *Called Up* For *TRIAL*, Do *YOU*
Understand?
Do *US* Both A Favor Anthony, Do *NOT* Go "Heaping Sin Upon Sin", It
Will *ONLY* "Increase My Workload", and Give Me A Reason To Get *YOU*
Out Of The Way, Sooner Rather Than Later!!! "I Sincerely *MEAN* What
I Say Anthony", the *Heavier* The Book Of *YOUR* Life Is, The *SOONER*
It's Going To *TRIAL*, Do *YOU* Understand How The Elect Processes
Books Of Life Thru To The Court Of *FINAL* Justice?
Right Now, *YOU* Are The Epitome Of "A Megalomaniac" and Should *SEEK*
To Understand HOW *YOU* "PRESENT" *YOURSELF* TO OTHERS... Therefore,
We "NEED" Change To Happen "Quickly" For *YOUR* Sake!!! ><(((*> Got
*JESUS*? <*)))><
Main Entry: meg·a·lo·ma·nia
Pronunciation: "me-g&-lO-'mA-nE-&, -ny&
Function: noun
Etymology: New Latin
Date: circa 1890
1 : a mania for great or grandiose performance
2 : a delusional mental disorder that is marked by infantile feelings
of personal omnipotence and grandeur
- meg·a·lo·ma·ni·ac /-'mA-nE-"ak/ adjective or noun
- meg·a·lo·ma·ni·a·cal /-m&-'nI-&-k&l/ also meg.a.lo.man.ic adjective
- meg·a·lo·ma·ni·a·cal·ly /-m&-'nI-&-k(&-)lE/ adverb
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Google Proves Dani to be a LIAR |
10 Nov 2004 04:38:30 PM |
|
|
In article <20041110092210.12272.00000584@mb-m28.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Here's the proof (as if any was needed).
Dani has lied and said that when she inquired about
someone who had not been posting, that she was not
looking for me, but for Grantland, what a laugh.
Now in this post dated 2004-10-24 00:59:15 PST
Grantland posted to the group:
From: (Grantland)
Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
Subject: Visceral Hatred
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 08:01:23 GMT
Organization: opinions international etc.
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <4172265a.489395793@ct-news.iafrica.com>
Reply-To:
NNTP-Posting-Host: wbs-210-32.telkomadsl.co.za
X-Trace: ctb-nnrp2.saix.net 1098604753 8637 165.165.210.32 (24 Oct 2004
07:59:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Oct 2004 07:59:13 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
soooo tired from shrieking at teh tv.. AAAAAAARGGGGGGGHHHHHHH!!!
G
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Three people followed up to Grantlands post, so even if for some bizarre reason
Dani couldn't see his post, she would have seen the follow-ups from:
No, that's not necessarily true. There are several different newsfeeds, and not
all articles make it through all the time. It happens a LOT.
BTW - nobody else really cares about this, you're just making yourself look like
a stalking weirdo.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Kerry-the liar.
More Racism from Susan The Liar
LIAR Powell Befouls my Screen!
1611 Definition of Nostradamus LIAR, IMPOSTOR
Jean Guernon - Liar, fraud and contemptivbel worm
IS SECRETARY RUMSFELD SENILE, A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, OR A SOCIOPATH?
Re: Either Bush is a liar or god is
Tony Blair:= Contemtible Liar
| Bush is a Pathological Liar, and so is Hillary...Still Yank losersare asleep.
- The Bushite Nazi Liar Show - where they, our elite corporate media masters, kill our stupid kids with their flagrant naked monster lies... "Al-Qaida" = "General Mahmoud Ahmad" - Death to the bushite, death to the enemies of Life
Re: no not trueam not liar
Jean Guernon - Liar, fraud, anti-semite:
Re: Is America ripe for dictatorship? [ Re: Tony Blair A Liar Over Iraq]
Re: Is America ripe for dictatorship? [ Re: Tony Blair A Liar Over Iraq]
Re: Dani is proven a LIAR once again
|
|
|
