*
With the ninth anniversary of this Paris car crash, the question
remains: Had Diana been pregnant at some time after the birth of
her last son?
*
Medical examiners have assured us that Diana was not pregnant
when she died. The other question remains: Had she been pregnant
some time before that?
*
Quatrain VIII-75 is the one prompting this question. Although
pure meaningful gobbledygook, a part of it at least hints at a
pregnant mother.
*
-------------- C E N T V R I E___H V I T I E M E. -----------
------------------ (édition prétendue de 1568) --------------
*
--------------------------- L X X V. ------------------------
--------- Le pere & filz seront meurdris ensemble -----------
--------- Le prefecteur deuant son pauillon -----------------
--------- La mere à Tours du fi lz ventre aura enfle. -------
--------- Caiche verdure de feuilles papillon. --------------
*
Line 1 speaks of the father. Line 1 speaks of the sons which
shall be put to death together at the same time. Line 3 speaks of
the mother... whose belly would have swollen from a son. In
French, the word fils (spelled here "filz") ends with a plural
's' (or "z", here) in both cases of a singular or plural. In line
1, the plural "seront" can suggest that both the father and the
son(s) are to be murdered together. Knowing the decyphered text,
one can also see that line 1 can be read as if the father was not
part of the rest of the line and that the sons (plural) shall be
murdered together.
*
How do I know that this meaningful gobbledygook refers to *that*
family?
*
You may wish to look for the answer in Google, as it was posted a
few times in this NewsGroup. The titles of these articles follow:
*
Subject: APNCL#0042 - The death of the Princess of Wales
Subject: APNCL#0043 - How quatrain VIII-75 was decrypted
Subject: APNCL#0101 - Revisiting quatrain VIII-75
*
And if you have questions not answered in these posts, ask away.
*
Have a nice day, folks!
*
Claude Latrémouille
August 31, 2006
http://web.ncf.ca/cj559
*
=== ===
=== CLAUDE LATRÉMOUILLE ===
===========================
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Had Diana been pregnant? |
03 Sep 2006 05:20:57 AM |
|
|
YAWN YAWN YAWN YAWN
Hey SNOT RAG ... your take is ludicrous, but then again you can only
flatter an obsessive!
Pity P the Le Mesurier is not here to make an idiot of you like he
always did, just by highlighting the inconsistencies of your
hypotheses'
Keep it up, we need Clowns.
LB
Claude Latremouille wrote:
*
With the ninth anniversary of this Paris car crash, the question
remains: Had Diana been pregnant at some time after the birth of
her last son?
*
Medical examiners have assured us that Diana was not pregnant
when she died. The other question remains: Had she been pregnant
some time before that?
*
Quatrain VIII-75 is the one prompting this question. Although
pure meaningful gobbledygook, a part of it at least hints at a
pregnant mother.
*
-------------- C E N T V R I E___H V I T I E M E. -----------
------------------ (=E9dition pr=E9tendue de 1568) --------------
*
--------------------------- L X X V. ------------------------
--------- Le pere & filz seront meurdris ensemble -----------
--------- Le prefecteur deuant son pauillon -----------------
--------- La mere =E0 Tours du fi lz ventre aura enfle. -------
--------- Caiche verdure de feuilles papillon. --------------
*
Line 1 speaks of the father. Line 1 speaks of the sons which
shall be put to death together at the same time. Line 3 speaks of
the mother... whose belly would have swollen from a son. In
French, the word fils (spelled here "filz") ends with a plural
's' (or "z", here) in both cases of a singular or plural. In line
1, the plural "seront" can suggest that both the father and the
son(s) are to be murdered together. Knowing the decyphered text,
one can also see that line 1 can be read as if the father was not
part of the rest of the line and that the sons (plural) shall be
murdered together.
*
How do I know that this meaningful gobbledygook refers to *that*
family?
*
You may wish to look for the answer in Google, as it was posted a
few times in this NewsGroup. The titles of these articles follow:
*
Subject: APNCL#0042 - The death of the Princess of Wales
Subject: APNCL#0043 - How quatrain VIII-75 was decrypted
Subject: APNCL#0101 - Revisiting quatrain VIII-75
*
And if you have questions not answered in these posts, ask away.
*
Have a nice day, folks!
*
Claude Latr=E9mouille
August 31, 2006
http://web.ncf.ca/cj559
*
=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D CLAUDE LATR=C9MOUILLE =3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D
.
|
|
|
| User: "Claude Latremouille" |
|
| Title: Re: Had Diana been pregnant? |
03 Sep 2006 10:15:47 AM |
|
|
*
On 3 Sep 2006 03:20:57 -0700, an Aussie Moron who persists in
responding to articles he can't even understand, responded to
this:
*
Claude Latremouille wrote:
*
With the ninth anniversary of this Paris car crash, the question
remains: Had Diana been pregnant at some time after the birth of
her last son?
*
Medical examiners have assured us that Diana was not pregnant
when she died. The other question remains: Had she been pregnant
some time before that?
*
Quatrain VIII-75 is the one prompting this question. Although
pure meaningful gobbledygook, a part of it at least hints at a
pregnant mother.
*
-------------- C E N T V R I E___H V I T I E M E. -----------
------------------ (édition prétendue de 1568) --------------
*
--------------------------- L X X V. ------------------------
--------- Le pere & filz seront meurdris ensemble -----------
--------- Le prefecteur deuant son pauillon -----------------
--------- La mere à Tours du fi lz ventre aura enfle. -------
--------- Caiche verdure de feuilles papillon. --------------
*
Line 1 speaks of the father. Line 1 speaks of the sons which
shall be put to death together at the same time. Line 3 speaks of
the mother... whose belly would have swollen from a son. In
French, the word fils (spelled here "filz") ends with a plural
's' (or "z", here) in both cases of a singular or plural. In line
1, the plural "seront" can suggest that both the father and the
son(s) are to be murdered together. Knowing the decyphered text,
one can also see that line 1 can be read as if the father was not
part of the rest of the line and that the sons (plural) shall be
murdered together.
*
How do I know that this meaningful gobbledygook refers to *that*
family?
*
You may wish to look for the answer in Google, as it was posted a
few times in this NewsGroup. The titles of these articles follow:
*
Subject: APNCL#0042 - The death of the Princess of Wales
Subject: APNCL#0043 - How quatrain VIII-75 was decrypted
Subject: APNCL#0101 - Revisiting quatrain VIII-75
*
And if you have questions not answered in these posts, ask away.
*
Have a nice day, folks!
*
Claude Latrémouille
August 31, 2006
http://web.ncf.ca/cj559
*
=== ===
=== CLAUDE LATRÉMOUILLE ===
===========================
*
To which "leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au" <leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au>
responded:
*
YAWN YAWN YAWN YAWN
Hey SNOT RAG ... your take is ludicrous, but then again you can only
flatter an obsessive!
Pity P the Le Mesurier is not here to make an idiot of you like he
always did, just by highlighting the inconsistencies of your
hypotheses'
Keep it up, we need Clowns.
LB
*
Your hero, Peter Ewart Britton, a.k.a., Peter Lemesurier, was
indeed given an opportunity to comment on this view of quatrain
VIII-75, but you seem to be too lazy to look it up in Google.
*
So, as you like to respond to posts you can't even understand,
here is that article again:
*
Subject: APNCL#0043 - How quatrain VIII-75 was decrypted
Message-ID: <20020912004401.W69840-100000@sheppard1.torfree.net>
Keywords: Nostradamus, Anagrams, Quatrain VIII-75
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 00:45:59 -0400
*
Originally posted as:
*
Subject: Re: Examples of cryptic anagrams (VIII-75)
Message-ID: <EGIusA.LBr.0.sheppard@torfree.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 23:33:46 GMT
*
From: (Peter Lemesurier)
Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
Subject: Re: Examples of cryptic anagrams (VIII-75)
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 09:27:59 GMT
Reply-To:
References: <EGGLyq.MBE.0.queen@torfree.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.74.254.92
Message-ID: <341bbe6e.0@hades.ndirect.co.uk>
Lines: 29
*
ac553@torfree.net (Claude Latremouille) wrote:
Original quatrain VIII-75 from the 1568 edition:
Le pere et filz seront meurdris ensemble
Le prefecteur deuant son pauillon
La mere à Tours du fi lz ventre aura enfle.
Caiche verdure de feuilles papillon.
Quatrain VIII-75 decrypted by Claude Latrémouille:
La Belle Princesse nommée Diane est tuée
Auecques Dodi, son Prétendant, prez
De la Tour de Gustave Eiffel, car l'Amour
De la Chère France leur a cousté la Vie.
Comments are welcome.
*
TO WHICH PETER ADDED
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, Claude. Did you work this out before or after? ;)
*
--
*
Peter
*
MY REPLY TO PETER
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is an objective fact that I did post it *after* their death.
So, strictly speaking, one is not faced here with a prophecy
confirmed by the facts of August 31 (Paris time). Therefore,
what I am about to add cannot be proved by the date it is posted,
so additional comments to this post should take into
consideration the fact that I am well aware of the (non-
prophetic) value of what I am writing below. Here goes:
*
It took me about three years to decrypt the entire prophecy.
While I was doing the decryption of VIII-75, I came upon line 1
of the anagrams above:
*
La Belle Princesse nommée Diane est tuée
*
Given what I had already found in the prophecy, I did not have
the heart to go on and I stopped decrypting that version of the
quatrain. A matter of "enough is enough", I suppose.
*
The reason I had begun a version dealing with Diana was that the
original quatrain, having spoken in line 1 of the father and of
the son(s), also spoke of the mother and of the son in line 3.
As I had already decoded a version dealing with the father and
the (two) sons, it appeared to me that the verse also had a
version dealing with the mother.
*
When that fatal Saturday night (our time) came upon us, I knew
that the first line of VIII-75 had been accomplished, so, a
day or two later (I forget if it was August 31 or September 1), I
did find the other three anagrams of that version above.
*
Of course, I am faced with the obscure third line of the original
quatrain, which (unfortunately) appears to give support to one of
the crazy conspiracy theories which have sprouted ever since.
But being no longer in the business of interpreting the quatrains
(unless prompted to do so ;-) ), I leave to others the task of
making sense of the original verse.
*
This is my honest answer.
*
-------------------- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Claude Latrémouille- % -- "Claude! There ain't no stinkin' -- %
Le 14 septembre 1997 % cryptic anagrams in them dang verses,- %
APNCL#0043 --------- % ya hear?!" (A chorus of a.p.n. voices) %
-------------------- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
*
Have a nice day, folks!
*
Claude Latrémouille
September 3, 2006
http://web.ncf.ca/cj559
*
=== ===
=== CLAUDE LATRÉMOUILLE ===
===========================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Had Diana been pregnant? |
03 Sep 2006 01:53:43 PM |
|
|
Claude Latremouille wrote:
*
On 3 Sep 2006 03:20:57 -0700, an Aussie Moron....cut.
Your 'information' is provided courtesy of a vivid imagination
liberally sprinkled with magical studies.
I don't know, nor do I care if she was, or was not pregnant at the time
of her death.
Now, Claude. You write from imagination. I write from knowledge. I met
Princess Diane at one formal occasion, and on countless other times
informally.
I arrested Charles valet for beating his wife up, seen Di without any
clothes on (They left the surveillance tv on by mistake) and chatted
about a wide variety of matters over a four year period in Tetbury,
Glos.
She was diferent to the other Royals, refreshing one might say.
So, do keep decoding, imagining.. if that pleases you. I have my memory
of her. It's rather more accurate than your dusty books and weird
alchemistry.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Had Diana been pregnant? |
04 Sep 2006 03:35:05 AM |
|
|
Werewolfy wrote:
Now, Claude. You write from imagination. I write
from knowledge.
From the deluded to the psychotic...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
