Here ya go Tommy Boy

Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > Here ya go Tommy Boy

LINK TO THIS PAGE

rating : 0 | 0

Page 1 of 2

Topic:	Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User:	"TonyZ2001"
Date:	09 Nov 2004 08:50:50 AM
Object:	Here ya go Tommy Boy

Here is Dani's post where she was looking for me,
and lest you accuse me of being paranoid or obsessed,
I will follow it up with posts from Woods and Shasta who
came to the very same conclusion.
The obsessed one is the one who went looking when
the other was not around.
Tony
Subject: Question (don't laugh)..
Path:
lobby!ngtf-m01.news.aol.com!ngpeer.news.aol.com!feed2.newsreader.com!newsr
eader.com!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpse
rver.com!news.glorb.com!wns14feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s01.POSTED!53ab27
50!not-for-mail
From: Dani

Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
Message-ID: <7k8pn01s1kdue5fqq4g51c05dobvcbtsjh@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.92/32.572
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 13
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.30.123.155
X-Complaints-To:

X-Trace: attbi_s01 1098687550 66.30.123.155 (Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 GMT
I've never kill-filed anyone so I don't know much about it.
My question is:
If someone kill-files me, does that mean that I also cannot see
*their* posts? I know they no longer see mine.. but I've noticed that
a certain someone (no mentioning names) is no longer appearing on my
newsreader and I never kill-filed him. Does it work both ways? If
someone kill-files me - do I also no longer see his/her posts?
Thank you.
Dani
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
From:

(Woodswun)
References: <7k8pn01s1kdue5fqq4g51c05dobvcbtsjh@4ax.com>
<pan.2004.10.25.12.01.27.656415@elaborate.com>
X-Newsreader: News Xpress 2.01
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <83jfd.22456$JS4.1435@twister.nyroc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 02:58:12 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.195.160.188
X-Complaints-To:

X-Trace: twister.nyroc.rr.com 1098759492 24.195.160.188 (Mon, 25 Oct 2004
22:58:12 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:58:12 EDT
Organization: Road Runner
In article <pan.2004.10.25.12.01.27.656415@elaborate.com>, Fredrick Garvin
<Garv@elaborate.com> wrote:

On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 +0000, Dani wrote:

I've never kill-filed anyone so I don't know much about it.

My question is:

If someone kill-files me, does that mean that I also cannot see
*their* posts?

No, if you kill the author you eliminate the author only. If you killfile
the subject you won't see that thread anymore.

I know they no longer see mine.. but I've noticed that
a certain someone (no mentioning names) is no longer appearing on my
newsreader and I never kill-filed him. Does it work both ways? If
someone kill-files me - do I also no longer see his/her posts?

You may have killfiled subject AND author by mistake.

I think he's left the newsgroup, if it's TonyZ that she's talking about.
Woods
...........................................................................
..................................
From:

(Anon Ymous)
Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
Date: 26 Oct 2004 08:03:43 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <5c2e70b2.0410260703.22edad9f@posting.google.com>
References: <7k8pn01s1kdue5fqq4g51c05dobvcbtsjh@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.242.124.155
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1098803027 6084 127.0.0.1 (26 Oct 2004 15:03:47
GMT)
X-Complaints-To:

NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:03:47 +0000 (UTC)
Dani <

> wrote in message
news:<7k8pn01s1kdue5fqq4g51c05dobvcbtsjh@4ax.com>...

I've never kill-filed anyone so I don't know much about it.

My question is:

If someone kill-files me, does that mean that I also cannot see
*their* posts? I know they no longer see mine.. but I've noticed that
a certain someone (no mentioning names) is no longer appearing on my
newsreader and I never kill-filed him. Does it work both ways? If
someone kill-files me - do I also no longer see his/her posts?

As everyone has already told you, his kill-file could not possibly affect
your messages. There's no way for him to filter your messages unless
he makes you mad enough to kill-file him yourself.
I think Tony has left for good. I know he said some things to you that
were unconscionable, but there was a time when I thought he
was one of the better posters on the group--back prior to the excessively
spammy news posts and the fall of Saddam. With Saddam in prison,
Tony's interpretation looks pretty ridiculous, and I think he
finally realized he was doing himself (and you and Amy, etc.) more
harm than it possibly could have been worth.
I never was able to get him to compare his own interpretation to
Jack Van Impe's point by point and verse by verse. Van Impe (a
doom-n-gloom televangelist on at 1:30 am est Sunday Nights on
Fox) thinks the big bad AC of the Bible will come out of the
European Union, and he uses a lot of Holy Roman Empire references
to support his interpretation.
Oh well. =( With Tony gone, the only people left that I remember
from the really really REELLY old days are Woodsie and Claude.
I think the group was pretty much in its death throes when
Peter left anyways.
S~
.

User: "tw"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	09 Nov 2004 08:59:58 AM

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041109095050.12394.00000451@mb-m28.aol.com...

Here is Dani's post where she was looking for me,
and lest you accuse me of being paranoid or obsessed,
I will follow it up with posts from Woods and Shasta who
came to the very same conclusion.

LOL! YOU poor fucking braindead sap. Please, pretty please with extra sugar,
show where Woods or Shasta interpret that post as "loooking for you".
Face facts, you have SEROUS problems, steroid-boy.

The obsessed one is the one who went looking when
the other was not around.
Tony

Ohh the irony...

Subject: Question (don't laugh)..
Path:
lobby!ngtf-m01.news.aol.com!ngpeer.news.aol.com!feed2.newsreader.com!newsr
eader.com!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpse
rver.com!news.glorb.com!wns14feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s01.POSTED!53ab27
50!not-for-mail
From: Dani

X-Trace: attbi_s01 1098687550 66.30.123.155 (Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10

GMT)

NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 GMT

I've never kill-filed anyone so I don't know much about it.

My question is:

If someone kill-files me, does that mean that I also cannot see
*their* posts? I know they no longer see mine.. but I've noticed that
a certain someone (no mentioning names) is no longer appearing on my
newsreader and I never kill-filed him. Does it work both ways? If
someone kill-files me - do I also no longer see his/her posts?

Thank you.

Dani
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
From:

X-Trace: twister.nyroc.rr.com 1098759492 24.195.160.188 (Mon, 25 Oct 2004
22:58:12 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:58:12 EDT
Organization: Road Runner

In article <pan.2004.10.25.12.01.27.656415@elaborate.com>, Fredrick Garvin
<Garv@elaborate.com> wrote:

On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 +0000, Dani wrote:

I've never kill-filed anyone so I don't know much about it.

My question is:

If someone kill-files me, does that mean that I also cannot see
*their* posts?

No, if you kill the author you eliminate the author only. If you killfile
the subject you won't see that thread anymore.

You may have killfiled subject AND author by mistake.

I think he's left the newsgroup, if it's TonyZ that she's talking about.

Woods
..........................................................................
.................................

From:

15:03:47

GMT)
X-Complaints-To:

NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:03:47 +0000 (UTC)

Dani <

> wrote in message
news:<7k8pn01s1kdue5fqq4g51c05dobvcbtsjh@4ax.com>...

As everyone has already told you, his kill-file could not possibly affect
your messages. There's no way for him to filter your messages unless
he makes you mad enough to kill-file him yourself.

I think Tony has left for good. I know he said some things to you that
were unconscionable, but there was a time when I thought he
was one of the better posters on the group--back prior to the excessively
spammy news posts and the fall of Saddam. With Saddam in prison,
Tony's interpretation looks pretty ridiculous, and I think he
finally realized he was doing himself (and you and Amy, etc.) more
harm than it possibly could have been worth.

I never was able to get him to compare his own interpretation to
Jack Van Impe's point by point and verse by verse. Van Impe (a
doom-n-gloom televangelist on at 1:30 am est Sunday Nights on
Fox) thinks the big bad AC of the Bible will come out of the
European Union, and he uses a lot of Holy Roman Empire references
to support his interpretation.

Oh well. =( With Tony gone, the only people left that I remember
from the really really REELLY old days are Woodsie and Claude.
I think the group was pretty much in its death throes when
Peter left anyways.

S~

User: "TonyZ2001"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	09 Nov 2004 09:31:29 AM

"tw"

wrote:

LOL! YOU poor fucking braindead sap. Please, pretty please with extra sugar,
show where Woods or Shasta interpret that post as "loooking for you".

Face facts, you have SEROUS >problems, steroid-boy.

Guess it would have strained you brain to actually read what they said, eh?
Par for the course on your part Tommy Boy.
Tony
.

User: "tw"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	10 Nov 2004 03:01:19 AM

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041109103129.12288.00000413@mb-m28.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

LOL! YOU poor fucking braindead sap. Please, pretty please with extra

sugar,

show where Woods or Shasta interpret that post as "loooking for you".

Face facts, you have SEROUS >problems, steroid-boy.

Guess it would have strained you brain to actually read what they said,

eh?
I read it. Please indicate where Woods or Shasta took it to mean she was
looking for you. It appears YOU are the one with reading difficulties.

Par for the course on your part Tommy Boy.

Projection noted, kook boy
<unsnip>
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041109095050.12394.00000451@mb-m28.aol.com...

Here is Dani's post where she was looking for me,
and lest you accuse me of being paranoid or obsessed,
I will follow it up with posts from Woods and Shasta who
came to the very same conclusion.

LOL! YOU poor fucking braindead sap. Please, pretty please with extra sugar,
show where Woods or Shasta interpret that post as "loooking for you".
Face facts, you have SEROUS problems, steroid-boy.

The obsessed one is the one who went looking when
the other was not around.
Tony

Ohh the irony...

X-Trace: attbi_s01 1098687550 66.30.123.155 (Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10

GMT)

X-Trace: twister.nyroc.rr.com 1098759492 24.195.160.188 (Mon, 25 Oct 2004
22:58:12 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:58:12 EDT
Organization: Road Runner

In article <pan.2004.10.25.12.01.27.656415@elaborate.com>, Fredrick Garvin
<Garv@elaborate.com> wrote:

On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 +0000, Dani wrote:

I've never kill-filed anyone so I don't know much about it.

My question is:

If someone kill-files me, does that mean that I also cannot see
*their* posts?

No, if you kill the author you eliminate the author only. If you killfile
the subject you won't see that thread anymore.

You may have killfiled subject AND author by mistake.

I think he's left the newsgroup, if it's TonyZ that she's talking about.

Woods
..........................................................................
.................................

From:

15:03:47

GMT)
X-Complaints-To:

NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:03:47 +0000 (UTC)

Dani <

> wrote in message
news:<7k8pn01s1kdue5fqq4g51c05dobvcbtsjh@4ax.com>...

As everyone has already told you, his kill-file could not possibly affect
your messages. There's no way for him to filter your messages unless
he makes you mad enough to kill-file him yourself.

I think Tony has left for good. I know he said some things to you that
were unconscionable, but there was a time when I thought he
was one of the better posters on the group--back prior to the excessively
spammy news posts and the fall of Saddam. With Saddam in prison,
Tony's interpretation looks pretty ridiculous, and I think he
finally realized he was doing himself (and you and Amy, etc.) more
harm than it possibly could have been worth.

I never was able to get him to compare his own interpretation to
Jack Van Impe's point by point and verse by verse. Van Impe (a
doom-n-gloom televangelist on at 1:30 am est Sunday Nights on
Fox) thinks the big bad AC of the Bible will come out of the
European Union, and he uses a lot of Holy Roman Empire references
to support his interpretation.

Oh well. =( With Tony gone, the only people left that I remember
from the really really REELLY old days are Woodsie and Claude.
I think the group was pretty much in its death throes when
Peter left anyways.

S~

User: "TonyZ2001"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	10 Nov 2004 07:42:33 AM

tw"

wrote:

I read it. Please indicate where Woods >or Shasta took it to mean she was
looking for you.

You have serious problems.
Tony
.

User: "tw"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	10 Nov 2004 07:56:09 AM

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041110084233.12272.00000578@mb-m28.aol.com...

tw"

wrote:

I read it. Please indicate where Woods >or Shasta took it to mean she was
looking for you.

You have serious problems.

Possibly, not as serious as yours however. PLease indicate where Shasta or
Woods took it to men she was LOOKING FOR YOU.

Tony

TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041109095050.12394.00000451@mb-m28.aol.com...

Here is Dani's post where she was looking for me,
and lest you accuse me of being paranoid or obsessed,
I will follow it up with posts from Woods and Shasta who
came to the very same conclusion.

LOL! YOU poor fucking braindead sap. Please, pretty please with extra sugar,
show where Woods or Shasta interpret that post as "loooking for you".
Face facts, you have SEROUS problems, steroid-boy.

The obsessed one is the one who went looking when
the other was not around.
Tony

Ohh the irony...

X-Trace: attbi_s01 1098687550 66.30.123.155 (Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10

GMT)

X-Trace: twister.nyroc.rr.com 1098759492 24.195.160.188 (Mon, 25 Oct 2004
22:58:12 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:58:12 EDT
Organization: Road Runner

In article <pan.2004.10.25.12.01.27.656415@elaborate.com>, Fredrick Garvin
<Garv@elaborate.com> wrote:

On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 +0000, Dani wrote:

I've never kill-filed anyone so I don't know much about it.

My question is:

If someone kill-files me, does that mean that I also cannot see
*their* posts?

No, if you kill the author you eliminate the author only. If you killfile
the subject you won't see that thread anymore.

You may have killfiled subject AND author by mistake.

I think he's left the newsgroup, if it's TonyZ that she's talking about.

Woods
..........................................................................
.................................

From:

15:03:47

GMT)
X-Complaints-To:

NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:03:47 +0000 (UTC)

Dani <

> wrote in message
news:<7k8pn01s1kdue5fqq4g51c05dobvcbtsjh@4ax.com>...

As everyone has already told you, his kill-file could not possibly affect
your messages. There's no way for him to filter your messages unless
he makes you mad enough to kill-file him yourself.

I think Tony has left for good. I know he said some things to you that
were unconscionable, but there was a time when I thought he
was one of the better posters on the group--back prior to the excessively
spammy news posts and the fall of Saddam. With Saddam in prison,
Tony's interpretation looks pretty ridiculous, and I think he
finally realized he was doing himself (and you and Amy, etc.) more
harm than it possibly could have been worth.

I never was able to get him to compare his own interpretation to
Jack Van Impe's point by point and verse by verse. Van Impe (a
doom-n-gloom televangelist on at 1:30 am est Sunday Nights on
Fox) thinks the big bad AC of the Bible will come out of the
European Union, and he uses a lot of Holy Roman Empire references
to support his interpretation.

Oh well. =( With Tony gone, the only people left that I remember
from the really really REELLY old days are Woodsie and Claude.
I think the group was pretty much in its death throes when
Peter left anyways.

S~

User: "TonyZ2001"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	10 Nov 2004 08:26:18 AM

"tw"

wrote:

You have serious problems.

Possibly, not as serious as yours >however.

Definitely, and much more serious than any I might have (teh).

PLease indicate where Shasta or
Woods took it to men she was LOOKING >FOR YOU.

I just proved her to be a LIAR, check the new post.
Tony
.

User: "tw"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	10 Nov 2004 08:43:23 AM

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041110092618.12272.00000586@mb-m28.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

You have serious problems.

Possibly, not as serious as yours >however.

Definitely, and much more serious than any I might have (teh).

PLease indicate where Shasta or
Woods took it to men she was LOOKING >FOR YOU.

I just proved her to be a LIAR, check the new post.

No, you proved yourself to be aclueless twat, yet again. Please indicate
where Shasta or Woods express the belief that dani was LOOKING FOR YOU.
Better still, ask them yourselves. "Hey, Shasta, Woods, did you think Dani
was LOOKING FOR TONY when she asked about the effects of killfiles?". I bet
you any amount of money you like that they will reply in the negative.
How about it?
.

User: "TonyZ2001"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	10 Nov 2004 10:13:59 AM

"tw"

wrote:

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041110092618.12272.00000586@mb-m28.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

You have serious problems.

Possibly, not as serious as yours >however.

Definitely, and much more serious than any I might have (teh).

PLease indicate where Shasta or
Woods took it to men she was LOOKING >FOR YOU.

I just proved her to be a LIAR, check the new post.

Sheesh you are a dope, they're posts already indicated what they thought at
that time, what they say about it now is of no importance.
Tony
.

User: "tw"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	10 Nov 2004 10:20:44 AM

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041110111359.12369.00000403@mb-m28.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041110092618.12272.00000586@mb-m28.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

You have serious problems.

Possibly, not as serious as yours >however.

Definitely, and much more serious than any I might have (teh).

PLease indicate where Shasta or
Woods took it to men she was LOOKING >FOR YOU.

I just proved her to be a LIAR, check the new post.

Dani

was LOOKING FOR TONY when she asked about the effects of killfiles?". I

bet

you any amount of money you like that they will reply in the negative.

How about it?

Sheesh you are a dope, they're posts already indicated what they thought

that time

Yep, and neother of them though she was LOOKING FOR YOU, did they Tony?

, what they say about it now is of no importance.

LOL! So you're pussying out of making a bet on it are you? You're one
yellow-bellied cocksucking son of a ***** aren't ya?
.

User: "Grantland"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	10 Nov 2004 10:27:35 AM

"tw" <

> wrote:

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041110111359.12369.00000403@mb-m28.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041110092618.12272.00000586@mb-m28.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

You have serious problems.

Possibly, not as serious as yours >however.

Definitely, and much more serious than any I might have (teh).

PLease indicate where Shasta or
Woods took it to men she was LOOKING >FOR YOU.

I just proved her to be a LIAR, check the new post.

Dani

was LOOKING FOR TONY when she asked about the effects of killfiles?". I

bet

you any amount of money you like that they will reply in the negative.

How about it?

Sheesh you are a dope, they're posts already indicated what they thought

that time

Yep, and neother of them though she was LOOKING FOR YOU, did they Tony?

, what they say about it now is of no importance.

LOL! So you're pussying out of making a bet on it are you? You're one
yellow-bellied cocksucking son of a ***** aren't ya?

His ***** mother still sucks negro ***** for pasta.
lol
.

User: "TonyZ2001"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	11 Nov 2004 10:09:02 AM

mithril@iafrica.com

wrote:

His ***** mother still sucks negro ***** >for pasta.

Wrong, I heard that was your wife and hence why she left you.
Tony
.

User: "Dani"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	11 Nov 2004 12:41:03 PM

On 11 Nov 2004 16:09:02 GMT,

(TonyZ2001) wrote:

mithril@iafrica.com

wrote:

His ***** mother still sucks negro ***** for pasta.

Wrong, I heard that was your wife and hence why she left you.

Oh the wit! Wow, Tony - you come up with some good ones!
When will you tell one of us that "Yo mumma says you ugly!"
LOLOLOLOLOL!
Drone.
Dani
.

User: "TonyZ2001"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	12 Nov 2004 07:45:38 AM

Dani

wrote:

tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:

mithril@iafrica.com

wrote:

His ***** mother still sucks negro ***** for pasta.

Wrong, I heard that was your wife and >>hence why she left you.

Oh the wit! Wow, Tony - you come up >with some good ones!

You are so stupid, the clown makes a lame crack toward me, and you focus on my
comeback.
But sad to say, my comeback is the truth.
Why do you think he hates her so, and all Jewish people because of her, and all
blacks?
Add it up of Dnse One.
And BTW, stop following me and harassing me you stalker.
Tony
.

User: "tw"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	11 Nov 2004 06:34:58 AM

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041110092618.12272.00000586@mb-m28.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

You have serious problems.

Possibly, not as serious as yours >however.

Definitely, and much more serious than any I might have (teh).

LOL! I hardly think the occasional typo is comparable to your bizarre
obsessions, fetishes and criminal behaviour, fatty.

PLease indicate where Shasta or
Woods took it to men she was LOOKING >FOR YOU.

I just proved her to be a LIAR, check the new post.

Tony

User: "TonyZ2001"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	11 Nov 2004 10:07:56 AM

"tw"

wrote:

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041110092618.12272.00000586@mb-m28.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

You have serious problems.

Possibly, not as serious as yours >>however.

Definitely, and much more serious >>than any I might have (teh).

LOL! I hardly think the occasional typo is

Typo? You used to do it in every single post and even said that you thought it
should be spelled that way. Funny how you never seemed to TYPO any other word
in post after post.
Tony
.

User: "tw"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	12 Nov 2004 02:29:27 AM

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041111110756.08198.00000502@mb-m04.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041110092618.12272.00000586@mb-m28.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

You have serious problems.

Possibly, not as serious as yours >>however.

Definitely, and much more serious >>than any I might have (teh).

LOL! I hardly think the occasional typo is

Typo? You used to do it in every single post and even said that you

thought it

should be spelled that way

BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Some Americans REALLY don't understand irony do they? I
thought it was just a myth..

Funny how you never seemed to TYPO any other word
in post after post.

Run along, fatty
.

User: "TonyZ2001"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	12 Nov 2004 07:49:07 AM

tw"

wrote:

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041111110756.08198.00000502@mb-m04.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041110092618.12272.00000586@mb-m28.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

You have serious problems.

Possibly, not as serious as yours >>however.

Definitely, and much more serious >>than any I might have (teh).

LOL! I hardly think the occasional typo is

Typo? You used to do it in every single post and even said that you

thought it

should be spelled that way

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

Laughing at yourself? Good, at least your compulsions don't take away your
sense of humor.
Tony
.

User: "tw"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	12 Nov 2004 08:07:19 AM

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041112084907.21753.00000390@mb-m12.aol.com...

tw"

wrote:

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041111110756.08198.00000502@mb-m04.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041110092618.12272.00000586@mb-m28.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

You have serious problems.

Possibly, not as serious as yours >>however.

Definitely, and much more serious >>than any I might have (teh).

LOL! I hardly think the occasional typo is

Typo? You used to do it in every single post and even said that you

thought it

should be spelled that way

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

Laughing at yourself?

No, no my snip-happy firend. Laughing at you:
BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Some Americans REALLY don't understand irony do they? I
thought it was just a myth..

Funny how you never seemed to TYPO any other word
in post after post.

Run along, fatty

Good, at least your compulsions don't take away your
sense of humor.

With you around to laugh at, my sense of humour has never been keener!

Tony

User: "Aidan"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	10 Nov 2004 09:58:53 PM

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041110092618.12272.00000586@mb-m28.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

You have serious problems.

Possibly, not as serious as yours >however.

Definitely, and much more serious than any I might have (teh).

PLease indicate where Shasta or
Woods took it to men she was LOOKING >FOR YOU.

I just proved

No, that's called conjecture... and it doesn't stand up in court, so why
would it here?

her to be a LIAR, check the new post.

Tony

User: "TonyZ2001"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	11 Nov 2004 10:06:27 AM

"Aidan"

wrote:

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041110092618.12272.00000586@mb-m28.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

You have serious problems.

Possibly, not as serious as yours >however.

Definitely, and much more serious than any I might have (teh).

PLease indicate where Shasta or
Woods took it to men she was LOOKING >FOR YOU.

I just proved

No, that's called conjecture... and it >doesn't stand up in court, so why
would it here?

Because this isn't a fricken court of law.
Tony
.

User: "Aidan"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	11 Nov 2004 05:24:20 PM

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041111110627.08198.00000500@mb-m04.aol.com...

"Aidan"

wrote:

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041110092618.12272.00000586@mb-m28.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

You have serious problems.

Possibly, not as serious as yours >however.

Definitely, and much more serious than any I might have (teh).

PLease indicate where Shasta or
Woods took it to men she was LOOKING >FOR YOU.

I just proved

No, that's called conjecture... and it >doesn't stand up in court, so why
would it here?

Because this isn't a fricken court of law.

Fair enough... but why should we believe your conjecture? It's far from
conclusive...
You are obsessed, not necessarily with Dani personally, but definatly with
trying to discredit her. Get over it.
.

User: "TonyZ2001"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	12 Nov 2004 07:47:51 AM

Aidan"

wrote:

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041111110627.08198.00000500@mb-m04.aol.com...

"Aidan"

wrote:

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041110092618.12272.00000586@mb-m28.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

You have serious problems.

Possibly, not as serious as yours >however.

Definitely, and much more serious than any I might have (teh).

PLease indicate where Shasta or
Woods took it to men she was LOOKING >FOR YOU.

I just proved

No, that's called conjecture... and it >doesn't stand up in court, so why
would it here?

Because this isn't a fricken court of >>law.

Fair enough... but why should we believe >your conjecture? It's far from
conclusive...

Two other people who are not by any means on my side came out of their own
accord and indicated that they thought Dani was looking for me. This proves
that it was not only in my mind.
Case closed.

You are obsessed, not necessarily with >Dani personally, but definatly with
trying to discredit her. Get over it.

I think you really need to take a look at her posts, and those of her friends,
and you will see that the exact opposite is true.
Tony
.

User: "tw"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	12 Nov 2004 08:06:02 AM

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041112084751.21753.00000389@mb-m12.aol.com...

Aidan"

wrote:

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041111110627.08198.00000500@mb-m04.aol.com...

"Aidan"

wrote:

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041110092618.12272.00000586@mb-m28.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

You have serious problems.

Possibly, not as serious as yours >however.

Definitely, and much more serious than any I might have (teh).

PLease indicate where Shasta or
Woods took it to men she was LOOKING >FOR YOU.

I just proved

No, that's called conjecture... and it >doesn't stand up in court, so

why

would it here?

Because this isn't a fricken court of >>law.

Fair enough... but why should we believe >your conjecture? It's far from
conclusive...

Two other people who are not by any means on my side came out of their own
accord and indicated that they thought Dani was looking for me.

No, they didn't. Woods herself has explained this and you STILL don't
fucking get it!

This proves
that it was not only in my mind.

They proved it IS all in your mind, you sick weirdo.

Case closed.

You are obsessed, not necessarily with >Dani personally, but definatly

with

trying to discredit her. Get over it.

I think you really need to take a look at her posts, and those of her

friends,

and you will see that the exact opposite is true.

Tony

User: "TonyZ2001"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	12 Nov 2004 08:55:53 AM

"tw"

wrote:

No, they didn't. Woods herself has >explained this

Woods is now lying to protect Dani from the obvious, that she is an obsessed
stalker.
Tony
.

User: "tw"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	12 Nov 2004 09:15:43 AM

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041112095553.00325.00000505@mb-m17.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

No, they didn't. Woods herself has >explained this

Woods is now lying to protect Dani from the obvious, that she is an

obsessed

stalker.

Damn, I nearly choked on my coffee! In years to come, we'll open a
Psychology Dictionary, and under "projection" it will simply say "Tony
Zanowicz"
.

User: "Woodswun"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	12 Nov 2004 04:29:08 PM

In article <cn2js5$6gv$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>, "tw" <

> wrote:

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041112095553.00325.00000505@mb-m17.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

No, they didn't. Woods herself has >explained this

Woods is now lying to protect Dani from the obvious, that she is an

obsessed

stalker.

Damn, I nearly choked on my coffee! In years to come, we'll open a
Psychology Dictionary, and under "projection" it will simply say "Tony
Zanowicz"

With a cross-reference to "denial".
;-)
Woods
.

User: "Absolute Zero"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	12 Nov 2004 09:13:06 AM

TonyZ2001 wrote:

"tw"

wrote:

No, they didn't. Woods herself has >explained this

Woods is now lying to protect Dani from the obvious, that she is an obsessed
stalker.

LOL
-A
.

User: "Aidan"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	09 Nov 2004 03:09:12 PM

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041109103129.12288.00000413@mb-m28.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

LOL! YOU poor fucking braindead sap. Please, pretty please with extra
sugar,
show where Woods or Shasta interpret that post as "loooking for you".

Face facts, you have SEROUS >problems, steroid-boy.

Guess it would have strained you brain to actually read what they said,
eh?

I read what she said... and Dani's post doesn't mention your name at all...
you've simply assumed, like Woods and Shasta did, that she was refering to
you... that's a pretty big assumption for a person telling someone else they
are obsessed with him.

Par for the course on your part Tommy Boy.

By the way... how long before Saddam is back in power? His sons? LOL!
.

User: "TonyZ2001"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	10 Nov 2004 07:41:48 AM

"Aidan"

wrote:

"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041109103129.12288.00000413@mb-m28.aol.com...

"tw"

wrote:

LOL! YOU poor fucking braindead sap. Please, pretty please with extra
sugar,
show where Woods or Shasta interpret that post as "loooking for you".

Face facts, you have SEROUS >problems, steroid-boy.

Guess it would have strained you brain to actually read what they said,
eh?

So Woods and Shasta are obsessed with Dani too? Get a grip, all of you morons
flock to Dani's defense when even 2 of the fairest people in this group agree
with me.

Par for the course on your part Tommy >>Boy.

By the way... how long before Saddam is >back in power? His sons? LOL!

Not long, Clown, not long.
Tony
.

User: "Dani"
Title: Re: Here ya go Tommy Boy	10 Nov 2004 05:52:33 AM

On 09 Nov 2004 14:50:50 GMT,

(TonyZ2001) wrote:

Hehe! I was talking about *Grantland* you fool! For some reason
I could only see *replies* to him, but not his original posts.
Bzzzzt! Wrong again! .. :)
Dani

X-Trace: attbi_s01 1098687550 66.30.123.155 (Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 GMT

I've never kill-filed anyone so I don't know much about it.

My question is:

If someone kill-files me, does that mean that I also cannot see
*their* posts? I know they no longer see mine.. but I've noticed that
a certain someone (no mentioning names) is no longer appearing on my
newsreader and I never kill-filed him. Does it work both ways? If
someone kill-files me - do I also no longer see his/her posts?

Thank you.

Dani
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
From:

X-Trace: twister.nyroc.rr.com 1098759492 24.195.160.188 (Mon, 25 Oct 2004
22:58:12 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:58:12 EDT
Organization: Road Runner

In article <pan.2004.10.25.12.01.27.656415@elaborate.com>, Fredrick Garvin
<Garv@elaborate.com> wrote:

On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:10 +0000, Dani wrote:

I've never kill-filed anyone so I don't know much about it.

My question is:

If someone kill-files me, does that mean that I also cannot see
*their* posts?

No, if you kill the author you eliminate the author only. If you killfile
the subject you won't see that thread anymore.

You may have killfiled subject AND author by mistake.

I think he's left the newsgroup, if it's TonyZ that she's talking about.

Woods
..........................................................................
.................................

From:

NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:03:47 +0000 (UTC)

Dani <

> wrote in message
news:<7k8pn01s1kdue5fqq4g51c05dobvcbtsjh@4ax.com>...

As everyone has already told you, his kill-file could not possibly affect
your messages. There's no way for him to filter your messages unless
he makes you mad enough to kill-file him yourself.

I think Tony has left for good. I know he said some things to you that
were unconscionable, but there was a time when I thought he
was one of the better posters on the group--back prior to the excessively
spammy news posts and the fall of Saddam. With Saddam in prison,
Tony's interpretation looks pretty ridiculous, and I think he
finally realized he was doing himself (and you and Amy, etc.) more
harm than it possibly could have been worth.

I never was able to get him to compare his own interpretation to
Jack Van Impe's point by point and verse by verse. Van Impe (a
doom-n-gloom televangelist on at 1:30 am est Sunday Nights on
Fox) thinks the big bad AC of the Bible will come out of the
European Union, and he uses a lot of Holy Roman Empire references
to support his interpretation.

Oh well. =( With Tony gone, the only people left that I remember
from the really really REELLY old days are Woodsie and Claude.
I think the group was pretty much in its death throes when
Peter left anyways.

S~

Page 1 of 2

Post reply

Here's what's next in Iraq
Syria: No Iraqi weapons here
How many of my favorite peoples here think KERRY will win in November 04 ?!?!?
Nostradamys says: France (and many readers here) will ignore his WARNING!
Something smells funny here
Saddam Was a Prophet? Well Looky Here!
Just as a matter of interest - who here believes in Evolution?
Your Uncle Wally is moving here, peoplez ;-)

Here Tommy, have fun
Here's another quote from Dani's "good man"
Hey Tony - here's a good article for you!
Gee, you mean WMD couldn't fit in here?
HOW MANY HERE 'HATE' JANE ? - POLL
I BEAT UP GOOD ANY ZIONIST MUTHERFUKER HERE
DIVINE NOTICE TO ALL ACCUSED HERE !!!

NEWER

pg.716 pg.544 pg.412 pg.311 pg.234 pg.175 pg.130 pg.96 pg.70 pg.50 pg.35 pg.24 pg.16 pg.10 pg.6 pg.3 pg.1

OLDER