Yet another obscure event from the past that the Seer from Salon
projected into the future using hindsight, rather than foresight.
Clever eh, this Nostradamus?!
Original 1555 Edition
I=2E96
Celuy qu'aura la charge de destruire
Temples, & sectes, chang=E9s par fantasie,
Plus aux rochiers qu'aux vivans viendra nuire
Par langue orn=E9e d'oreilles ressaisie.
Translation in English Verse
He who was charged with dashing to the ground
Temples and sects, shall be changed by a vision,
The rocks more than the living shall he wound,
Ears possessed by his flowery oration.
Source: The New Testament book of Acts describing the conversion of
Saul on the road to Damascus in 36 AD and the Apostles' ministry after
Christ's death. At this time, the followers of Jesus were small,
struggling sects who posed little threat to anyone, certainly not to
the mighty Roman empire, but there was one particular individual
determined to see these sects exterminated. His name was Saul and he
became the greatest persecutor of the early Christian churches. But
within a matter of a few years, the Christian's fiercest antichrist
suddenly became it's most effective advocate. Apparently struck by a
powerful vision on the road to Damascus, Saul converted, changed his
name to Paul and became the greatest missionary in the history of
Christianity, preaching the flowery concept of living in the Spirit of
the new covenant, rather than living in the flesh of the old covenant.
In fact, he went on to write more of the New Testament books than any
other.=20
Merlin
.
|
|
| User: "Claude Latremouille" |
|
| Title: Re: The Real Gary Somai |
09 Sep 2006 02:31:21 PM |
|
|
*
On 9 Sep 2006 03:29:03 -0700, Gary Somai, a.k.a. The Master, a.k.a.
"Merlin" <merlin2rhyme@yahoo.co.uk>, uttered once more one of his
countless plagiarized lemesuriades, thereby showing the world how
stupid he is:
*
Yet another obscure event from the past that the Seer from Salon
projected into the future using hindsight, rather than foresight.
Clever eh, this Nostradamus?!
*
Perhaps it has not yet dawned upon this superb cretin that his
systematic disinformation does not change a thing as far as the
encyphered nature of Nostradamus' texts. In fact, it might even
reinforce it.
*
Whether or not Nostradamus published texts which were a reference
to his past (the Roger Prévost, plagiarized by Peter Ewart
Britton, plagiarized by Gary Somai, contention), the texts
published by Nostradamus are a cypher of his hidden prophecy
about the unintended destruction of Paris, on Sunday, August 13,
2017, at 3:53 a.m.
*
Nostradamus, therefore, did not need to use a prophetic statement
to hide his prophecy about the fate of Paris. The fact that I am
of the view that he did does not change anything at all. Using a
non-prophetic text, or using a prophetic text, to hide the very
same thing boils down to... the very same thing. This, our
British disinformation morons have failed to grasp (like
everything else about Nostradamus).
*
Moreover, if their contention were true, Nostradamus'
contemporary readers would have noticed that Nostradamus was
using events from his past -- and in some cases very recent
events from his own past, as contended by these twerps -- and
would have blamed him for having done so. Au contraire, they
blamed him for having had the audacity to predict... the future!
*
Clever, eh, this Nostradamus?!
*
Claude Latrémouille
September 9, 2006
http://web.ncf.ca/cj559
*
=== ===
=== CLAUDE LATRÉMOUILLE ===
===========================
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
