<snip>
Comment:
350 tons is 7000 pounds. Qaqaa was also cited by CIA I believe to have
<snip>
Above please note the intellect of one M J McDonald. He must have taken the
same courses and studied at the same institutions as GW Bush. If it takes
2000 lbs to make one ton then 7000 lbs (note the calculation here Michael)
7000 divided by 2000 would equal 3.5 tons.
350 tons of RDX and HDX is 700,000 lbs. 1/2 lb (that is 8 ounces Michael)
once brought down a 747. In a half witted attempt to defend the incompetent
imbecile GW Bush by trivializing this major newsbyte you have proven
yourself to be just as retarded and inept as your president.
Lugnut
.
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
28 Oct 2004 12:13:49 AM |
|
|
"Lug Nut" <lugnut@emailaccounts.com> Spat the Words
<snip>
Comment:
350 tons is 7000 pounds. Qaqaa was also cited by CIA I believe to have
<snip>
Above please note the intellect of one M J McDonald. He must have taken
the same courses and studied at the same institutions as GW Bush. If it
takes 2000 lbs to make one ton then 7000 lbs (note the calculation here
Michael) 7000 divided by 2000 would equal 3.5 tons.
350 tons of RDX and HDX is 700,000 lbs. 1/2 lb (that is 8 ounces
Michael) once brought down a 747.
That would indicate whoever has that stuff (presumably insurgents
or possibly al-zakari whateverhisname) could carry on fighting
indefinitely.
350ton x 2000lbs/ton = 700,000 lbs
That's a lot of high explosive.
In a half witted attempt to defend
the incompetent imbecile GW Bush by trivializing this major newsbyte you
have proven yourself to be just as retarded and inept as your president.
Lugnut
.
|
|
|
| User: "Never anonymous Bud" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
28 Oct 2004 01:10:57 AM |
|
|
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> on Thu, 28 Oct 2004 05:13:49 GMT
spoke:
350ton x 2000lbs/ton = 700,000 lbs
That's a lot of high explosive.
Except it's more like 380 metric tons,
or over 800,000 pounds.
--
To reply by email, remove the XYZ.
Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.
This sig censored by the Office of Home and Land Insecurity....
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
28 Oct 2004 01:50:40 PM |
|
|
Yeah,. Saddam was quite an ***** who harbored the piece of *****.
Another reason that justifies the invasion, thank you very much, losers.
Hopefully though he (Zarkawi) will blow himself up by mistake.
J.
R. Foreman a écrit:
"Lug Nut" <lugnut@emailaccounts.com> Spat the Words
<snip>
Comment:
350 tons is 7000 pounds. Qaqaa was also cited by CIA I believe to have
<snip>
Above please note the intellect of one M J McDonald. He must have taken
the same courses and studied at the same institutions as GW Bush. If it
takes 2000 lbs to make one ton then 7000 lbs (note the calculation here
Michael) 7000 divided by 2000 would equal 3.5 tons.
350 tons of RDX and HDX is 700,000 lbs. 1/2 lb (that is 8 ounces
Michael) once brought down a 747.
That would indicate whoever has that stuff (presumably insurgents
or possibly al-zakari whateverhisname) could carry on fighting
indefinitely.
350ton x 2000lbs/ton = 700,000 lbs
That's a lot of high explosive.
In a half witted attempt to defend
the incompetent imbecile GW Bush by trivializing this major newsbyte you
have proven yourself to be just as retarded and inept as your president.
Lugnut
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Aidan" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
25 Oct 2004 10:08:45 PM |
|
|
"Lug Nut" <lugnut@emailaccounts.com> wrote in message
news:PRifd.23544$nl.7035@pd7tw3no...
....
If it takes 2000 lbs to make one ton
it takes 2205lbs to total 1 metric ton.
So, one last calculation (just because I want to be hair splittingly
accurate):
2205 * 350 = 771750 pounds of explosives gone missing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Never anonymous Bud" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
25 Oct 2004 10:25:35 PM |
|
|
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "Aidan" <nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> on Tue, 26 Oct 2004 03:08:45 GMT spoke:
2205 * 350 = 771750 pounds of explosives gone missing.
But the initial number was 380 metric tons,
so it's probably even more than 7.7 million pounds.
--
To reply by email, remove the XYZ.
Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.
This sig censored by the Office of Home and Land Insecurity....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Aidan" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
25 Oct 2004 11:12:20 PM |
|
|
"Never anonymous Bud" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
news:ougrn0ht25tp77p726lejcb02c6370819p@4ax.com...
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "Aidan"
<nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> on Tue, 26 Oct 2004 03:08:45 GMT spoke:
2205 * 350 = 771750 pounds of explosives gone missing.
But the initial number was 380 metric tons,
so it's probably even more than 7.7 million pounds.
an extra 30 tons, hey? Well, just slap another 66150 lbs on top of my
original result.
a whopping *837900 lbs* of high explosives.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
26 Oct 2004 03:55:45 AM |
|
|
"Aidan" <nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> wrote in message
news:newscache$0gh66i$zok$1@titan.linknet.com.au...
"Never anonymous Bud" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
news:ougrn0ht25tp77p726lejcb02c6370819p@4ax.com...
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "Aidan"
<nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> on Tue, 26 Oct 2004 03:08:45 GMT spoke:
2205 * 350 = 771750 pounds of explosives gone missing.
But the initial number was 380 metric tons,
so it's probably even more than 7.7 million pounds.
an extra 30 tons, hey?
Metric tons, which is (was?) usually written "tonnes".
Well, just slap another 66150 lbs on top of my
original result.
a whopping *837900 lbs* of high explosives.
So 380,000 kilos - this metric stuff is easy!
re: John's question - I'd reckon about 2 kilos per nuke. so that's, what
190,000 nukes it could trigger? ;-) I'm pretty sure that exceeds the world
warhead stockpile by a factor of at least 10...
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
28 Oct 2004 12:20:35 AM |
|
|
"tw" <no@no.com> Spat the Words
"Aidan" <nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> wrote in message
news:newscache$0gh66i$zok$1@titan.linknet.com.au...
"Never anonymous Bud" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
news:ougrn0ht25tp77p726lejcb02c6370819p@4ax.com...
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "Aidan"
<nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> on Tue, 26 Oct 2004 03:08:45 GMT spoke:
2205 * 350 = 771750 pounds of explosives gone missing.
But the initial number was 380 metric tons,
so it's probably even more than 7.7 million pounds.
an extra 30 tons, hey?
Metric tons, which is (was?) usually written "tonnes".
Well, just slap another 66150 lbs on top of my
original result.
a whopping *837900 lbs* of high explosives.
So 380,000 kilos - this metric stuff is easy!
Here's a tough one. How many pounds of the stuff can you cram
into a mini-van to be detonated outside the green zone? Just
assume a cubic meter of hmx weighs about 80 pounds and the
mini-van has an inside volume of, let's say, 10 cubic meters.
My estimate is about 800 pounds of explosive, and someone said
1/2 pound could blow up an airplane, so what kind of explosion
do you get with 800 pounds? You could maybe bring down a building
or something with that amount of explosive.
re: John's question - I'd reckon about 2 kilos per nuke. so that's, what
190,000 nukes it could trigger? ;-) I'm pretty sure that exceeds the
world
warhead stockpile by a factor of at least 10...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: " John F Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
26 Oct 2004 07:40:27 AM |
|
|
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:cll37m$36a$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
"Aidan" <nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> wrote in message
news:newscache$0gh66i$zok$1@titan.linknet.com.au...
"Never anonymous Bud" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
news:ougrn0ht25tp77p726lejcb02c6370819p@4ax.com...
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "Aidan"
<nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> on Tue, 26 Oct 2004 03:08:45 GMT spoke:
2205 * 350 = 771750 pounds of explosives gone missing.
But the initial number was 380 metric tons,
so it's probably even more than 7.7 million pounds.
an extra 30 tons, hey?
Metric tons, which is (was?) usually written "tonnes".
Well, just slap another 66150 lbs on top of my
original result.
a whopping *837900 lbs* of high explosives.
So 380,000 kilos - this metric stuff is easy!
re: John's question - I'd reckon about 2 kilos per nuke. so that's, what
190,000 nukes it could trigger? ;-) I'm pretty sure that exceeds the world
warhead stockpile by a factor of at least 10...
Thanks for the information and putting things in perspective. :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
26 Oct 2004 08:06:46 AM |
|
|
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote in message
news:ZIGdnXuobsVo2-PcRVn-qA@locallink.net...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:cll37m$36a$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
"Aidan" <nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> wrote in message
news:newscache$0gh66i$zok$1@titan.linknet.com.au...
"Never anonymous Bud" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
news:ougrn0ht25tp77p726lejcb02c6370819p@4ax.com...
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "Aidan"
<nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> on Tue, 26 Oct 2004 03:08:45 GMT
spoke:
2205 * 350 = 771750 pounds of explosives gone missing.
But the initial number was 380 metric tons,
so it's probably even more than 7.7 million pounds.
an extra 30 tons, hey?
Metric tons, which is (was?) usually written "tonnes".
Well, just slap another 66150 lbs on top of my
original result.
a whopping *837900 lbs* of high explosives.
So 380,000 kilos - this metric stuff is easy!
re: John's question - I'd reckon about 2 kilos per nuke. so that's, what
190,000 nukes it could trigger? ;-) I'm pretty sure that exceeds the
world
warhead stockpile by a factor of at least 10...
Thanks for the information and putting things in perspective. :-)
It's a pleasure. Makes a nice change from tweaking the neighbourhood madman.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
26 Oct 2004 05:05:37 AM |
|
|
tw a écrit:
"Aidan" <nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> wrote in message
news:newscache$0gh66i$zok$1@titan.linknet.com.au...
"Never anonymous Bud" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
news:ougrn0ht25tp77p726lejcb02c6370819p@4ax.com...
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "Aidan"
<nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> on Tue, 26 Oct 2004 03:08:45 GMT spoke:
2205 * 350 = 771750 pounds of explosives gone missing.
But the initial number was 380 metric tons,
so it's probably even more than 7.7 million pounds.
an extra 30 tons, hey?
Metric tons, which is (was?) usually written "tonnes".
Well, just slap another 66150 lbs on top of my
original result.
a whopping *837900 lbs* of high explosives.
So 380,000 kilos - this metric stuff is easy!
re: John's question - I'd reckon about 2 kilos per nuke. so that's, what
190,000 nukes it could trigger? ;-) I'm pretty sure that exceeds the world
warhead stockpile by a factor of at least 10...
It takes plutonium first to even consider.
The UN whines after it has guaranteed there were no such a thing.
Fucking weasels. Like you.
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
26 Oct 2004 07:04:50 AM |
|
|
Shut your mouth dope. And get a fucking haircut! My arsehole is tidier than
your head.
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:Rjpfd.3354024$ic1.341462@news.easynews.com...
tw a écrit:
"Aidan" <nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> wrote in message
news:newscache$0gh66i$zok$1@titan.linknet.com.au...
"Never anonymous Bud" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
news:ougrn0ht25tp77p726lejcb02c6370819p@4ax.com...
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "Aidan"
<nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> on Tue, 26 Oct 2004 03:08:45 GMT spoke:
2205 * 350 = 771750 pounds of explosives gone missing.
But the initial number was 380 metric tons,
so it's probably even more than 7.7 million pounds.
an extra 30 tons, hey?
Metric tons, which is (was?) usually written "tonnes".
Well, just slap another 66150 lbs on top of my
original result.
a whopping *837900 lbs* of high explosives.
So 380,000 kilos - this metric stuff is easy!
re: John's question - I'd reckon about 2 kilos per nuke. so that's, what
190,000 nukes it could trigger? ;-) I'm pretty sure that exceeds the
world
warhead stockpile by a factor of at least 10...
It takes plutonium first to even consider.
The UN whines after it has guaranteed there were no such a thing.
Fucking weasels. Like you.
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
26 Oct 2004 07:53:18 AM |
|
|
Pathetic anti-semite idiot.
J.
tw a écrit:
Shut your mouth dope. And get a fucking haircut! My arsehole is tidier than
your head.
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:Rjpfd.3354024$ic1.341462@news.easynews.com...
tw a écrit:
"Aidan" <nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> wrote in message
news:newscache$0gh66i$zok$1@titan.linknet.com.au...
"Never anonymous Bud" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
news:ougrn0ht25tp77p726lejcb02c6370819p@4ax.com...
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "Aidan"
<nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> on Tue, 26 Oct 2004 03:08:45 GMT spoke:
2205 * 350 = 771750 pounds of explosives gone missing.
But the initial number was 380 metric tons,
so it's probably even more than 7.7 million pounds.
an extra 30 tons, hey?
Metric tons, which is (was?) usually written "tonnes".
Well, just slap another 66150 lbs on top of my
original result.
a whopping *837900 lbs* of high explosives.
So 380,000 kilos - this metric stuff is easy!
re: John's question - I'd reckon about 2 kilos per nuke. so that's, what
190,000 nukes it could trigger? ;-) I'm pretty sure that exceeds the
world
warhead stockpile by a factor of at least 10...
It takes plutonium first to even consider.
The UN whines after it has guaranteed there were no such a thing.
Fucking weasels. Like you.
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
26 Oct 2004 08:03:37 AM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:2Nrfd.3361720$ic1.342615@news.easynews.com...
Pathetic anti-semite idiot.
J.
I like your new sig Jean! Suits you!
tw a écrit:
Shut your mouth dope. And get a fucking haircut! My arsehole is tidier
than
your head.
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:Rjpfd.3354024$ic1.341462@news.easynews.com...
tw a écrit:
"Aidan" <nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> wrote in message
news:newscache$0gh66i$zok$1@titan.linknet.com.au...
"Never anonymous Bud" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
news:ougrn0ht25tp77p726lejcb02c6370819p@4ax.com...
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "Aidan"
<nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> on Tue, 26 Oct 2004 03:08:45 GMT
spoke:
2205 * 350 = 771750 pounds of explosives gone missing.
But the initial number was 380 metric tons,
so it's probably even more than 7.7 million pounds.
an extra 30 tons, hey?
Metric tons, which is (was?) usually written "tonnes".
Well, just slap another 66150 lbs on top of my
original result.
a whopping *837900 lbs* of high explosives.
So 380,000 kilos - this metric stuff is easy!
re: John's question - I'd reckon about 2 kilos per nuke. so that's,
what
190,000 nukes it could trigger? ;-) I'm pretty sure that exceeds the
world
warhead stockpile by a factor of at least 10...
It takes plutonium first to even consider.
The UN whines after it has guaranteed there were no such a thing.
Fucking weasels. Like you.
J.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: " John F Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
25 Oct 2004 11:23:52 PM |
|
|
"Aidan" <nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> wrote in message
news:newscache$0gh66i$zok$1@titan.linknet.com.au...
"Never anonymous Bud" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
news:ougrn0ht25tp77p726lejcb02c6370819p@4ax.com...
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "Aidan"
<nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> on Tue, 26 Oct 2004 03:08:45 GMT spoke:
2205 * 350 = 771750 pounds of explosives gone missing.
But the initial number was 380 metric tons,
so it's probably even more than 7.7 million pounds.
an extra 30 tons, hey? Well, just slap another 66150 lbs on top of my
original result.
a whopping *837900 lbs* of high explosives.
Which is enough to bring down 1,675,800 commercial jetliners.
We'd have to ask tw how many nuclear warheads that could trigger.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
25 Oct 2004 11:53:41 PM |
|
|
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote:
"Aidan" <nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> wrote in message
news:newscache$0gh66i$zok$1@titan.linknet.com.au...
"Never anonymous Bud" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
news:ougrn0ht25tp77p726lejcb02c6370819p@4ax.com...
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "Aidan"
<nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> on Tue, 26 Oct 2004 03:08:45 GMT spoke:
2205 * 350 = 771750 pounds of explosives gone missing.
But the initial number was 380 metric tons,
so it's probably even more than 7.7 million pounds.
an extra 30 tons, hey? Well, just slap another 66150 lbs on top of my
original result.
a whopping *837900 lbs* of high explosives.
Which is enough to bring down 1,675,800 commercial jetliners.
We'd have to ask tw how many nuclear warheads that could trigger.
Don't forget all those crates of pencils missing - could be used to
stab out 135337 innocent young babies eyes! or write 1548563 pages of
subversive litrature! or graffitti 5447849 sinister Saddam posters!!
or penetrate 578965843 times the bleeding ***** of GEORGE W BUSH
HIMSELF!! YES! YES!!!!!!!! do it man!
w
.
|
|
|
| User: " John F Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
26 Oct 2004 12:20:28 AM |
|
|
"Grantland" <mithril@iafrica.com> wrote in message
news:417dd759.33128506@ct-news.iafrica.com...
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote:
"Aidan" <nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> wrote in message
news:newscache$0gh66i$zok$1@titan.linknet.com.au...
"Never anonymous Bud" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
news:ougrn0ht25tp77p726lejcb02c6370819p@4ax.com...
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "Aidan"
<nospam.aidan@linknet.com.au> on Tue, 26 Oct 2004 03:08:45 GMT
spoke:
2205 * 350 = 771750 pounds of explosives gone missing.
But the initial number was 380 metric tons,
so it's probably even more than 7.7 million pounds.
an extra 30 tons, hey? Well, just slap another 66150 lbs on top of my
original result.
a whopping *837900 lbs* of high explosives.
Which is enough to bring down 1,675,800 commercial jetliners.
We'd have to ask tw how many nuclear warheads that could trigger.
Don't forget all those crates of pencils missing - could be used to
stab out 135337 innocent young babies eyes! or write 1548563 pages of
subversive litrature! or graffitti 5447849 sinister Saddam posters!!
or penetrate 578965843 times the bleeding ***** of GEORGE W BUSH
HIMSELF!! YES! YES!!!!!!!! do it man!
w
That's not my proclivity, man. Not that there's anything wrong with that
and I'm not saying it's yours. :-)
Nice to see you back Grantland. You must have heard Dani ask about you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
26 Oct 2004 05:47:47 PM |
|
|
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote in message news:<v5edneEba5xIQuDcRVn-gQ@locallink.net>...
w
That's not my proclivity, man. Not that there's anything wrong with that
and I'm not saying it's yours. :-)
Nice to see you back Grantland.
Do you approve of his statements he posted here recently?
Header Topic: "Jew Filth and Shiteating Lies " ?
Does that make you feel warm inside?
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&threadm=5c2e70b2.0410260014.21683610%40posting.google.com&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26group%3Dalt.prophecies.nostradamus
Are you gong to still run away from saying that USA carved up the
middle east after WWI?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Barbarossa" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
29 Oct 2004 10:56:35 AM |
|
|
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> schreef in bericht
news:dd3256f0.0410261447.3ad819e3@posting.google.com...
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote in message
news:<v5edneEba5xIQuDcRVn-gQ@locallink.net>...
w
That's not my proclivity, man. Not that there's anything wrong with
that
and I'm not saying it's yours. :-)
Nice to see you back Grantland.
Do you approve of his statements he posted here recently?
Header Topic: "Jew Filth and Shiteating Lies " ?
Does that make you feel warm inside?
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&threadm=5c2e70b2.0410260014.216836
10%40posting.google.com&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DU
TF-8%26group%3Dalt.prophecies.nostradamus
Are you gong to still run away from saying that USA carved up the
middle east after WWI?
Since you felt this urgent need to correct my English (which is not my
native language) in another thread I think you don't mind that I correct
some of your English (which is your native language):
Not "Are you gong", but "Are you going".
Not "that USA", but "that the USA"
Not "middle east", but "Middle East" (it's a geographical region)
Three big errors in one sentence MJM! ;-)
Kind Regards,
Barbarossa ;-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
29 Oct 2004 01:48:24 PM |
|
|
"Barbarossa" <fa073505@skynet.be> wrote in message
news:418267c2$0$19560$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be...
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> schreef in bericht
news:dd3256f0.0410261447.3ad819e3@posting.google.com...
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote in message
news:<v5edneEba5xIQuDcRVn-gQ@locallink.net>...
w
That's not my proclivity, man. Not that there's anything wrong with
that
and I'm not saying it's yours. :-)
Nice to see you back Grantland.
Do you approve of his statements he posted here recently?
Header Topic: "Jew Filth and Shiteating Lies " ?
Does that make you feel warm inside?
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&threadm=5c2e70b2.0410260014.216836
10%40posting.google.com&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DU
TF-8%26group%3Dalt.prophecies.nostradamus
Are you gong to still run away from saying that USA carved up the
middle east after WWI?
Since you felt this urgent need to correct my English (which is not my
native language) in another thread I think you don't mind that I correct
some of your English (which is your native language):
Not "Are you gong", but "Are you going".
Not "that USA", but "that the USA"
Not "middle east", but "Middle East" (it's a geographical region)
Three big errors in one sentence MJM! ;-)
Kind Regards,
Barbarossa ;-)
Watch it ... he might end up going into another meltdown.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.784 / Virus Database: 530 - Release Date: 10/27/04
.
|
|
|
| User: "Barbarossa" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
30 Oct 2004 06:38:02 PM |
|
|
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvin@galaxy.com> schreef in bericht
news:bgwgd.24105$Qs6.1811543@news20.bellglobal.com...
"Barbarossa" <fa073505@skynet.be> wrote in message
news:418267c2$0$19560$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be...
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> schreef in bericht
news:dd3256f0.0410261447.3ad819e3@posting.google.com...
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote in message
news:<v5edneEba5xIQuDcRVn-gQ@locallink.net>...
w
That's not my proclivity, man. Not that there's anything wrong with
that
and I'm not saying it's yours. :-)
Nice to see you back Grantland.
Do you approve of his statements he posted here recently?
Header Topic: "Jew Filth and Shiteating Lies " ?
Does that make you feel warm inside?
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&threadm=5c2e70b2.0410260014.216836
10%40posting.google.com&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DU
TF-8%26group%3Dalt.prophecies.nostradamus
Are you gong to still run away from saying that USA carved up the
middle east after WWI?
Since you felt this urgent need to correct my English (which is not my
native language) in another thread I think you don't mind that I correct
some of your English (which is your native language):
Not "Are you gong", but "Are you going".
Not "that USA", but "that the USA"
Not "middle east", but "Middle East" (it's a geographical region)
Three big errors in one sentence MJM! ;-)
Kind Regards,
Barbarossa ;-)
Watch it ... he might end up going into another meltdown.
Hmmm, you mean him suddenly popping up in China? Please
have mercy on the Chinese will ya? ;-)
It must be hard for him to have an European (English is not my
first or native language) correct his English (where English is his
first or native language).
He is so strict! He only wants literate people to vote in the USA
elections. Do you think he qualified? :-)
It always makes me laugh when an American like him has this urgent
need to correct non Americans and then making one mistake after the
other in English. And I am really not the only one laughing about this! :-)
Kind Regards,
Barbarossa
.
|
|
|
|
| User: " John F Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
29 Oct 2004 06:52:47 PM |
|
|
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvin@galaxy.com> wrote in message
news:bgwgd.24105$Qs6.1811543@news20.bellglobal.com...
"Barbarossa" <fa073505@skynet.be> wrote in message
news:418267c2$0$19560$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be...
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> schreef in bericht
news:dd3256f0.0410261447.3ad819e3@posting.google.com...
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote in message
news:<v5edneEba5xIQuDcRVn-gQ@locallink.net>...
w
That's not my proclivity, man. Not that there's anything wrong with
that
and I'm not saying it's yours. :-)
Nice to see you back Grantland.
Do you approve of his statements he posted here recently?
Header Topic: "Jew Filth and Shiteating Lies " ?
Does that make you feel warm inside?
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&threadm=5c2e70b2.0410260014.216836
10%40posting.google.com&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DU
TF-8%26group%3Dalt.prophecies.nostradamus
Are you gong to still run away from saying that USA carved up the
middle east after WWI?
Since you felt this urgent need to correct my English (which is not my
native language) in another thread I think you don't mind that I correct
some of your English (which is your native language):
Not "Are you gong", but "Are you going".
Not "that USA", but "that the USA"
Not "middle east", but "Middle East" (it's a geographical region)
Three big errors in one sentence MJM! ;-)
Kind Regards,
Barbarossa ;-)
Watch it ... he might end up going into another meltdown.
Is he still saying that I said the US carved up the Middle East? Has he
ever provided a link to article in the Google archive where I said that?
If he responds, Marv, reply to it please, otherwise I won't see it.
Michael's posts fall into my killfile.
Maybe we can finally clear this up.
If he ends up needing to dig thru the archive to find the article he may
discover that I put the blame for the leadership of all that on France and
England long before he started showing his yellow tinged complexion in this
group.
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
29 Oct 2004 10:38:11 PM |
|
|
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> Spat the Words
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvin@galaxy.com> wrote in message
news:bgwgd.24105$Qs6.1811543@news20.bellglobal.com...
"Barbarossa" <fa073505@skynet.be> wrote in message
news:418267c2$0$19560$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be...
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> schreef in
bericht news:dd3256f0.0410261447.3ad819e3@posting.google.com...
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote in message
news:<v5edneEba5xIQuDcRVn-gQ@locallink.net>...
w
That's not my proclivity, man. Not that there's anything wrong
with
that
and I'm not saying it's yours. :-)
Nice to see you back Grantland.
Do you approve of his statements he posted here recently?
Header Topic: "Jew Filth and Shiteating Lies " ?
Does that make you feel warm inside?
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&threadm=5c2e70b2.0410260014.216
836
10%40posting.google.com&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%
3DU
TF-8%26group%3Dalt.prophecies.nostradamus
Are you gong to still run away from saying that USA carved up the
middle east after WWI?
Since you felt this urgent need to correct my English (which is not
my native language) in another thread I think you don't mind that I
correct some of your English (which is your native language):
Not "Are you gong", but "Are you going".
Not "that USA", but "that the USA"
Not "middle east", but "Middle East" (it's a geographical region)
Three big errors in one sentence MJM! ;-)
Kind Regards,
Barbarossa ;-)
Watch it ... he might end up going into another meltdown.
Is he still saying that I said the US carved up the Middle East? Has he
ever provided a link to article in the Google archive where I said that?
Are you talking about McNuggets? He accused me of saying the same
thing. What's up with that? I don't think it was the US which carved
up the mideast... probably more accurately it was England and France.
If he responds, Marv, reply to it please, otherwise I won't see it.
Michael's posts fall into my killfile.
Maybe we can finally clear this up.
If he ends up needing to dig thru the archive to find the article he may
discover that I put the blame for the leadership of all that on France
and England long before he started showing his yellow tinged complexion
in this group.
.
|
|
|
| User: " John F Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
30 Oct 2004 12:05:16 AM |
|
|
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9591DC1951DC6rrfkwrantispamattbic@204.127.204.17...
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> Spat the Words
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvin@galaxy.com> wrote in message
news:bgwgd.24105$Qs6.1811543@news20.bellglobal.com...
"Barbarossa" <fa073505@skynet.be> wrote in message
news:418267c2$0$19560$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be...
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> schreef in
bericht news:dd3256f0.0410261447.3ad819e3@posting.google.com...
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote in message
news:<v5edneEba5xIQuDcRVn-gQ@locallink.net>...
w
That's not my proclivity, man. Not that there's anything wrong
with
that
and I'm not saying it's yours. :-)
Nice to see you back Grantland.
Do you approve of his statements he posted here recently?
Header Topic: "Jew Filth and Shiteating Lies " ?
Does that make you feel warm inside?
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&threadm=5c2e70b2.0410260014.216
836
10%40posting.google.com&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%
3DU
TF-8%26group%3Dalt.prophecies.nostradamus
Are you gong to still run away from saying that USA carved up the
middle east after WWI?
Since you felt this urgent need to correct my English (which is not
my native language) in another thread I think you don't mind that I
correct some of your English (which is your native language):
Not "Are you gong", but "Are you going".
Not "that USA", but "that the USA"
Not "middle east", but "Middle East" (it's a geographical region)
Three big errors in one sentence MJM! ;-)
Kind Regards,
Barbarossa ;-)
Watch it ... he might end up going into another meltdown.
Is he still saying that I said the US carved up the Middle East? Has he
ever provided a link to article in the Google archive where I said that?
Are you talking about McNuggets? He accused me of saying the same
thing. What's up with that? I don't think it was the US which carved
up the mideast... probably more accurately it was England and France.
He did accuse you of that too didn't he? He was also screaming and calling
David Kay a ***** for having an unsavory relationship with a 14 yr old on the
internet. The errors he's made are too many to mention yet he seems to go
nuts over taking people to task for perceived errors.
That's why he's in my killfile. He's just a kid, why bother, really?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
30 Oct 2004 07:48:46 PM |
|
|
John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> Spat the Words
Here is your link tard. Now explain it.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=US+carved+up+the+Middle+East+Michael+McDonald&hl=en&lr=&selm=MZKdnXgZNJT32DbdRVn-ug%40locallink.net&rnum=7
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
30 Oct 2004 07:49:19 PM |
|
|
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote in message news:<IbWdna1lGLWQRB_cRVn-1w@locallink.net>...
Is he still saying that I said the US carved up the Middle East? Has he
ever provided a link to article in the Google archive where I said that?
John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> Spat the Words
Here is your link tard. Now explain it.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=US+carved+up+the+Middle+East+Michael+McDonald&hl=en&lr=&selm=MZKdnXgZNJT32DbdRVn-ug%40locallink.net&rnum=7
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
26 Oct 2004 06:30:26 PM |
|
|
(Michael Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote in message news:<v5edneEba5xIQuDcRVn-gQ@locallink.net>...
w
That's not my proclivity, man. Not that there's anything wrong with that
and I'm not saying it's yours. :-)
Nice to see you back Grantland.
Do you approve of his statements he posted here recently?
Header Topic: "Jew Filth and Shiteating Lies " ?
Does that make you feel warm inside?
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&threadm=5c2e70b2.0410260014.21683610%40posting.google.com&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26group%3Dalt.prophecies.nostradamus
Why don't you *****, you fucking cabbage. Go play with your
dollies.
Grantland
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
27 Oct 2004 01:04:24 AM |
|
|
Grantland a écrit:
abookoflife@yahoo.com (Michael Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
" John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote in message news:<v5edneEba5xIQuDcRVn-gQ@locallink.net>...
w
That's not my proclivity, man. Not that there's anything wrong with that
and I'm not saying it's yours. :-)
Nice to see you back Grantland.
Do you approve of his statements he posted here recently?
Header Topic: "Jew Filth and Shiteating Lies " ?
Does that make you feel warm inside?
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&threadm=5c2e70b2.0410260014.21683610%40posting.google.com&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26group%3Dalt.prophecies.nostradamus
Why don't you *****, you fucking cabbage. Go play with your
dollies.
Grantland
Heil Hitler grantland! LOL.
Fucking anti-semite piece of *****.
YOU, *****, garbage.
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
27 Oct 2004 08:25:45 AM |
|
|
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Nice to see you back Grantland.
Why don't you *****, you fucking cabbage. Go play with your
dollies.
Grantland
Heil Hitler grantland!
Sieg Heil, Jeanno!
LOL. Fucking anti-semite piece of *****.
LOL! Good on e there!
YOU, *****, garbage.
Ya, FOAD mcdonald, you Bushiste Jew vermin. lol! Bushiste vermin
FILTH! hahahaha *****
J.
G
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
26 Oct 2004 04:44:13 PM |
|
|
"Lug Nut" <lugnut@emailaccounts.com> wrote in message news:<PRifd.23544$nl.7035@pd7tw3no>...
<snip>
Comment:
350 tons is 7000 pounds. Qaqaa was also cited by CIA I believe to have
<snip>
Above please note the intellect of one M J McDonald. He must have taken the
same courses and studied at the same institutions as GW Bush.
So I went to Yale & Harvard?
Bush BIO: http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html
If it takes
2000 lbs to make one ton then 7000 lbs (note the calculation here Michael)
7000 divided by 2000 would equal 3.5 tons.
Forgive my slip up. I lost two zeros ;) Can we get down to the real
point of your exercise here please? OK you are a lefty shill and
possibly a old member under a new name. Hummm 49 post from Jan? That
is not a huge record.
"Why would any intelligent self respecting
Canadian want to live in a country filled with intolerant, inbred,
unintelligent, paranoid assholes such as yourself. Since your own
country
seems to be so deeply divided and you seem to focus so much time and
energy
devouring each other "demo-sluts" vs. "neo-cons", why don't you just
have
another civil war, kill each other off and do the rest of the world a
big
favour.
Lugnut"
Nice profile ;) I can say easily now that you are a kook ;)
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 15:43:34 GMT
64.59.144.75
X-Complaints-To:
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.80.198.246
From: "Lug Nut" <lugnut@emailaccounts.com>
Subject: Re: 1,000,000 a month Human Tidal Wave Spills Over Border
350 tons of RDX and HDX is 700,000 lbs.
Bwahahaahahahahahahahha. terchnically RDX and HDX have nothing to do
with the calculation idiot. ;)
350 tons is 700,000 lbs ;)
Not "350 tons of RDX and HDX is 700,000 lbs." - Dumb Lug Nut ;)
1/2 lb (that is 8 ounces Michael)
once brought down a 747.
Yep, and this means that Iraq brake the UN agreements and USA
agreements and war was justified. Nice of you to bring that up Kook?
;)
In a half witted attempt to defend the incompetent
imbecile GW Bush
I wouldn't call "half witted" an attempt to defend stupidity of your
self in "kill [ Americans] each other off and do the rest of the world
a big
favour."
by trivializing this major newsbyte you have proven
Wrong logic as you have shown how kooky you are ;)
yourself to be just as retarded and inept as your president.
I wouldn't say 'retarded and inept as your president,' because anyone
wishing the total annihilation of the population of America like ya do
is a kook. ;)
BTW, Dumb-kook-Nut, Kerry bought the leak and admitted that Iraq had
WMD finally. That legitimizes Bush.
John Edwards claimed today in Wilmington, Ohio: "These are exactly the
kind of explosives terrorists want."
How is that TARD, for a pres. you call retarded and inept ;)
Here is more for ya tard ;)
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahha ;)
"They're the dangerous weapons we wanted to keep from falling in the
hands of terrorists. And now these explosives are out there, and we
have no idea who's got them." - John Edwards Wilmington, Ohio. -
Tuesday, Oct. 26, 2004
CNN: LOL ;)
''NBC News reported that on April 10, 2003, its crew was embedded with
the U.S. Army's 101st Airborne Division when troops arrived at the Al
Qaqaa storage facility south of Baghdad.
While the troops found large stockpiles of conventional explosives,
they did not find HMX or RDX, the types of powerful explosives that
reportedly went missing, according to NBC.''
Baghdad fell on April 9, 2003. According to NBC, troops from the 101st
Airborne arrived the next day and could not [CNN lefty edit: find] the
material.
At the Pentagon, officials said that the site had been repeatedly
searched but the high explosives the IAEA described were never found.
The Pentagon said the Al Qaqaa facility was a "level 2" priority on a
list of 500 sites to be searched and secured. U.S. officials say it
was visited dozens of times by U.S. troops in the months following the
invasion, and -- after searching 32 bunkers and 87 other buildings --
they never came upon the stockpile.
In 1992 it was the Iran Contra charges brought days before the
election... In 2000 it was the DUI charges a few days before the
vote... And Now...
Sources:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/10/26/iraq.explosives/index.html
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/10/26/141756.shtml
http://drudgereport.com/nbcw6.htm
Lugnut
you sure are ;)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiot and new Math |
26 Oct 2004 04:28:40 AM |
|
|
Lug Nut a écrit:
<snip>
Comment:
350 tons is 7000 pounds. Qaqaa was also cited by CIA I believe to have
<snip>
Above please note the intellect of one M J McDonald. He must have taken the
same courses and studied at the same institutions as GW Bush. If it takes
2000 lbs to make one ton then 7000 lbs (note the calculation here Michael)
7000 divided by 2000 would equal 3.5 tons.
Yes lugnut, Michael made a mistake, big deal.
Still there are hundreds of thousands of pounds of explosives and this
represent merely 1% of the total amount of munitions and other
explosives in Iraq which are under constant guard. It was impossible to
keep everything under check, 1% loss is an achievement.
There are places 6 miles long of weapons stuff for instance, Saddam was
crazy about getting all this btw from the weasels' countries.
They should send them back to them! LOL
Anyway, the truth about that is (verbatim):
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/10/20041025-1.html
Now, if you go back and look at the Duelfer report that recently has
come out, according to the Duelfer report, as of mid September, more
than 243,000 tons of munitions have been destroyed since Operation Iraqi
Freedom. Coalition forces have cleared and reviewed a total of 10,033
caches of munitions; another nearly 163,000 tons of munitions have been
secured and are on line to be destroyed. That puts this all -- that puts
this all in context. (...) But that's why I pointed out what we did to
-- literally, there were munitions caches spread throughout Iraq at the
end of Operation Iraqi Freedom. That's why I pointed out the large
volume of munitions that have already been destroyed and the large
volume that are on-line to be destroyed. The sites now are the
responsibility of the Iraqi government to secure.
Of course you take the weasels whining at heart... let's see what is
said about that:
Q This morning, in Senator Kerry's remarks, he calls this one of the
greatest blunders in the Iraq mission and this presidency. How do you
respond to that?
MR. McCLELLAN: Well, Senator Kerry has a strategy of protest and retreat
for Iraq. It is essential that we succeed in Iraq, because Iraq is
critical to winning the war on terrorism. The President will talk in his
remarks today about how the terrorists understand how high the stakes
are in Iraq. They are doing everything they can to try to disrupt the
progress we are making toward free elections in Iraq. And this is a
critical difference in how the two candidates view the war on terrorism.
Senator Kerry has a strategy for retreat and defeat in Iraq. The
President has a strategy for success in Iraq. We are making important
progress. And as I pointed out, the first priority, when it came to
these munitions, was to make sure that there was not a nuclear
proliferation risk. There is not a nuclear proliferation risk. We're
talking about conventional explosives, when we talk about these -- and
that's why I pointed out the more than 243,000 munitions that have
already been destroyed, and nearly 163,000 munitions that are in the
process or are awaiting to be destroyed now. So this, as I said, this
was pointed out by the Iraqi Interim Government to the IAEA, and then we
were informed about it just in recent days.
Etc.
OVER 400,000 tons secured. It couldn't be done all at once. 1%, well,
LESS than 2% say, 1 point something percent have been looted. It would
have been predictable even with more troops at the onset of the
liberation with every prisoners freed along with soldiers all becoming
illegal combatants almost all at the same time and organizing to
perpetuate the tyranny...
J.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
