Getting their news from TV is not a sign of intelligence. Especially
when it comes to FOX news.
i
.
|
|
| User: "Fester" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
27 Jul 2004 07:09:29 PM |
|
|
"Ignoramus14306" <ignoramus14306@NOSPAM.14306.invalid> wrote in message
news:ce17n7$23m$5@pita.alt.net...
Getting their news from TV is not a sign of intelligence. Especially
when it comes to FOX news.
I just love this stuff. I like FOX news, and I really love seeing the
effect it has on Libs. FNC has filled a massive void for fair reporting, as
has been demonstrated by the rise of the channel to its domination of cable
news. Now we hear the cries and whines against "corporate media," replete
with proposed laws aimed specifically against them. Capitalism was just
fine with the Libs when it meant that CNN could spew its unchallenged
propaganda. Clear channel is the enemy of the people because so much of the
marketplace has demanded that Rush be heard. NPR is a darling despite (if
not becuase of) the same. I say rant on, it's amusing.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sovereign SockpuppetŠ" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
25 Jul 2004 04:15:08 PM |
|
|
"Ignoramus14306" <ignoramus14306@NOSPAM.14306.invalid> wrote in message
news:ce17n7$23m$5@pita.alt.net...
Getting their news from TV is not a sign of intelligence. Especially
when it comes to FOX news.
Nothing is as ignorant and useless as a political flame, FOX news not
withstanding.
--
The AFA-B Sovereign SockpuppetŠ
Government/Media Sponsored/Supported Disinformation/Mind Control Agent
Chief of Weather Control, Super Secret 34°, Order of the Illuminati
Presidential Puppeteer of the New World Order
Skepticult ID: 581-00504-208
Sockmaster General
"I can't fight no one" - Joseph "Foameo" Bartlo
Confession ID: <news:40C1EDA4.1066DFF4@enter.net>
"I was voted 'Kook of the year'" - Raymond "Fathead" Karczewski
Confession ID: <news:40c76759.8283745@news.west.earthlink.net>
"I goofed..." - Ed "Dumb as Rocks" Conrad
Confession ID: <news:cg7kf0ho8cs84vq8db4npdr2hdimtirlco@4ax.com>
"Of Course I am a kook !" - Pietro "Pieboi" Sommavilla
Confession ID: <news:204c3b0a.0407200025.618bf7d8@posting.google.com>
"I have been drinking like this for 40 years" - Stephen "Varnish" Vanier
Confession ID: <news:7JWKc.99$u96.20664@news.uswest.net>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "dreamwalker" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
25 Jul 2004 04:49:11 PM |
|
|
Fox rocks! I never leave home without a good dose of reality. No wonder why the Canadian thought
police won't it allow shown in their country.
"Ignoramus14306" <ignoramus14306@NOSPAM.14306.invalid> wrote in message
news:ce17n7$23m$5@pita.alt.net...
Getting their news from TV is not a sign of intelligence. Especially
when it comes to FOX news.
i
.
|
|
|
| User: "AK" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
26 Jul 2004 01:49:46 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 16:49:11 -0500, "dreamwalker" <backfromthe@dead.net> wrote:
Fox rocks! I never leave home without a good dose of reality.
No wonder why the Canadian thought
police won't it allow shown in their country.
http://www.outfoxed.org
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
26 Jul 2004 07:11:41 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 16:49:11 -0500, dreamwalker <backfromthe@dead.net>
wrote:
Fox rocks! I never leave home without a good dose of reality. No wonder
why the Canadian thought
police won't it allow shown in their country.
"Ignoramus14306" <ignoramus14306@NOSPAM.14306.invalid> wrote in message
news:ce17n7$23m$5@pita.alt.net...
Getting their news from TV is not a sign of intelligence. Especially
when it comes to FOX news.
i
Actually, they *will it allow* to be shown.
I guess it's just we're a bit more intelligent on average to bother.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
29 Jul 2004 06:31:36 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 16:49:11 -0500, dreamwalker wrote:
Fox rocks! I never leave home without a good dose of reality.
MMMMMMMMMIIIIIIIIIIIIRRRRRRRRRTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTHHHHHHHHHHHH
Yes, the dream world of 'reality.'
[]
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "AK" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
26 Jul 2004 01:53:15 AM |
|
|
On 25 Jul 2004 21:12:07 GMT, Ignoramus14306
<ignoramus14306@NOSPAM.14306.invalid> wrote:
Getting their news from TV is not a sign of intelligence. Especially
when it comes to FOX news.
David Cole
Iinnocuously enough. On Monday, June 21, a producer from Fox News's The O'Reilly
Factor called to ask me to appear as a guest that evening to comment on a
front-page story in the New York Times claiming that the Bush Administration had
overstated the value of intelligence gained at Guant?namo and the dangers posed
by the men detained there. I'm generally not a fan of shout-television, and I
had declined several prior invitations to appear on O'Reilly's show, but this
time I said yes. Little did I know it would not only be my first time, but also
my last.
I sat in the Washington studio as the taping of the show began in New York with
a rant from Bill O'Reilly. He claimed that "the Factor" had established the link
between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein, and then played a clip from Thomas Kean,
head of the Senate's 9/11 Commission, in which Kean said, "There is no evidence
that we can find whatsoever that Iraq or Saddam Hussein participated in any way
in attacks on the United States, in other words, on 9/11. What we do say,
however, is there were contacts between Iraq and Saddam Hussein. Iraq,
Saddam--excuse me. Al Qaeda."
I was impressed. O'Reilly, who had announced his show as the "No Spin Zone," was
actually playing a balanced soundbite, one that accurately reported the
commission's findings both that there was no evidence linking Saddam and 9/11,
and that there was some evidence of contacts (if no "collaborative
relationship") between Saddam and Al Qaeda. Maybe all those nasty things Al
Franken had said about O'Reilly weren't true after all.
But suddenly O'Reilly interrupted, plainly angry, and said, "We can't use
that.... We need to redo the whole thing." Three minutes of silence later, the
show began again, with O'Reilly re-recording the introduction verbatim. Except
this time, when he got to the part about Kean, he played no tape, and simply
paraphrased Kean as confirming that "definitely there was a connection between
Saddam and Al Qaeda." The part about no link to 9/11 was left on the
cutting-room floor.
Now it was my turn. O'Reilly introduced the segment by complaining that we are
at war and need to be united, but that newspapers like the New York Times are
running biased stories, dividing the country and aiding the enemy. "The spin
must stop--our lives depend on it," O'Reilly gravely intoned. He then
characterized the Times story that day as claiming that the Guant?namo detainees
were "innocent people" and "harmless." He said the paper's article "questions
holding the detainees at Guant?namo."
I noted that the Times had said nothing of the sort. And I pointed out that the
article relied on a CIA study finding that the detainees seemed to be low-level
and had provided little valuable intelligence.
That didn't convince O'Reilly, however, who again criticized the Times for
misleading its readers by terming the detainees innocent and not dangerous. I
replied that he was misleading his own viewers, by exaggerating what the Times
had said. "No, I'm not," he retorted. So far, the usual fare on newstalk
television.
But then I decided to go one step further: "It seems to me like the pot calling
the kettle black, Bill, because I just sat here five minutes ago as you
re-recorded the introduction to this show to take out a statement from the head
of the 9/11 commission stating that there was no evidence of a link between
Saddam Hussein and 9/11."
Apparently O'Reilly does not like being called "the pot." He exploded,
repeatedly called me an "S.O.B." and assured me that he would cut my accusation
from the interview when the show aired. He also said I would "never ever" be on
his show again. At this point, I wasn't sure whether to take that as a threat or
a promise.
Sure enough, when The O'Reilly Factor aired later that night, both Thomas Kean's
statement about 9/11 and my charge about O'Reilly deleting it were missing. All
that was left was Bill O'Reilly, fuming at the liberal media's lack of
objectivity and balance, and ruing the divisive effect "spin" has on our
national unity.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
26 Jul 2004 02:05:46 PM |
|
|
AK <someoneNasty@hotmails.com> wrote in message news:<hca9g0tgt1ok25v927i6lla0pvqpna302j@4ax.com>...
On 25 Jul 2004 21:12:07 GMT, Ignoramus14306
<ignoramus14306@NOSPAM.14306.invalid> wrote:
Getting their news from TV is not a sign of intelligence. Especially
when it comes to FOX news.
David Cole
Iinnocuously enough.
Impersonating others again AK? What a criminal you are.
What word is this? 'Iinnocuously ?'
A Georgetown University professor would not misspell some word he
obviously knows and uses often.
You probably meant 'Innocuously' theaf, criminal.
We wouldn't expect anything more from a terrorist loving criminal
like you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
27 Jul 2004 03:59:56 AM |
|
|
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0407261105.5201ef7a@posting.google.com...
AK <someoneNasty@hotmails.com> wrote in message
news:<hca9g0tgt1ok25v927i6lla0pvqpna302j@4ax.com>...
On 25 Jul 2004 21:12:07 GMT, Ignoramus14306
<ignoramus14306@NOSPAM.14306.invalid> wrote:
Getting their news from TV is not a sign of intelligence. Especially
when it comes to FOX news.
David Cole
Iinnocuously enough.
Impersonating others again AK? What a criminal you are.
What word is this? 'Iinnocuously ?'
MacDonald, I really don't understand why you insist on going down this road.
You are incapable of writing the simplest paragraph without multiple
grammatical and spelling errors yet you try and pick on someone else's typo.
You really are dumber than the dumbest bag of extremely dumb rocks. No
wonder you're still in school and playing with power rangers at your age.
A Georgetown University professor would not misspell some word he
obviously knows and uses often.
You probably meant 'Innocuously' theaf, criminal.
"Theaf"? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
We wouldn't expect anything more from a terrorist loving criminal
like you.
What crimes has he committed MacDonut? Remember when you had to apolgise to
Krib for your libellous statements? Haven't you learned your lesson?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
27 Jul 2004 07:37:13 PM |
|
|
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:<ce55da$ioh$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>...
David Cole
Iinnocuously enough.
Impersonating others again AK? What a criminal you are.
What word is this? 'Iinnocuously ?'
MacDonald, I really don't understand why you insist on going down this road.
You are incapable of writing the simplest paragraph without multiple
grammatical and spelling errors
I agree, but that is not what the post pointed out. Yet a person
against school like you couldn't understand it. And why are you
defending a legit terrorist anyway? Something you need to tell us here
at APN? Jean is right about your supporting the hate people of the
world.
yet you try and pick on someone else's typo.
It wasn't a typo. And you are too stupid to know what it was.
BTW, remember you trying to correct my spelling with a link to
Dictionary.com
You were so stupid that the word you linked telling me I misspelled it
was, in fact, exactly correct. ;) I had the word spelled correctly
and you posted the link with your vile tone, as usual, telling me I
misspelled it.
You are dumber than the dumbest. ;)
You really are dumber than the dumbest bag of extremely dumb rocks.
lol. I have to laugh at that. ;)
No
wonder you're still in school and playing with power rangers at your age.
Ahhh. The still in school rhetoric of APN lefties. Well school did you
no good, I see. ;)
A Georgetown University professor would not misspell some word he
obviously knows and uses often.
You probably meant 'Innocuously' theaf, criminal.
"Theaf"? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
We wouldn't expect anything more from a terrorist loving criminal
like you.
What crimes has he committed MacDonut? Remember when you had to apolgise to
Krib for your libellous statements? Haven't you learned your lesson?
Uniformed garbage on your part. BTW You said you were going to leave
if Jean found you posting or agreeing with anti-Semitic views. Well
why aren't you gone yet. Have you no shame or honor? You lost, you
leave!
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
28 Jul 2004 03:24:17 AM |
|
|
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0407271637.e7df9eb@posting.google.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:<ce55da$ioh$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>...
David Cole
Iinnocuously enough.
Impersonating others again AK? What a criminal you are.
What word is this? 'Iinnocuously ?'
MacDonald, I really don't understand why you insist on going down this
road.
You are incapable of writing the simplest paragraph without multiple
grammatical and spelling errors
I agree, but that is not what the post pointed out.
You agree you aer an illiterate ignoramus? Good.
Yet a person
against school like you couldn't understand it.
I'm not AGAINST school Mikey, it's just that I got my high school education
when I was high school age, unlike you.
And why are you
defending a legit terrorist anyway?
I'm not.
Something you need to tell us here
at APN? Jean is right about your supporting the hate people of the
world.
Jean is nearly as crazy as you, pissranger.
yet you try and pick on someone else's typo.
It wasn't a typo.
Of course it was.
And you are too stupid to know what it was.
Whatever..
BTW, remember you trying to correct my spelling with a link to
Dictionary.com
No.
You were so stupid that the word you linked telling me I misspelled it
was, in fact, exactly correct. ;) I had the word spelled correctly
and you posted the link with your vile tone, as usual, telling me I
misspelled it.
Cite?
You are dumber than the dumbest. ;)
Dumber than you?
You really are dumber than the dumbest bag of extremely dumb rocks.
lol. I have to laugh at that. ;)
No
wonder you're still in school and playing with power rangers at your
age.
Ahhh. The still in school rhetoric of APN lefties. Well school did you
no good, I see. ;)
A Georgetown University professor would not misspell some word he
obviously knows and uses often.
You probably meant 'Innocuously' theaf, criminal.
"Theaf"? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
We wouldn't expect anything more from a terrorist loving criminal
like you.
What crimes has he committed MacDonut? Remember when you had to apolgise
to
Krib for your libellous statements? Haven't you learned your lesson?
Uniformed
Uniformed?
garbage on your part. BTW You said you were going to leave
if Jean found you posting or agreeing with anti-Semitic views.
UniNformed garbage on your part. I sadi if Jean could provide a post that an
impartial observer (Woods, in this case) found anti-semitic I would leave.
If she didn't find it anti-semitic and Jean apologsed I would leave too.
What did Woods say?
<Begin Quote>
In article <cd3d76$793$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>, "tw" <no@no.com>
wrote:
Quite simply, do you find following statement anti-semitic:
"Jewish Christian, Muslim (and any other religious stripe) Fundamentalists
are twisted Hypocrites, who really pray to the devil."
Thanks in advance
Nope, it's pretty even handed against every group of fundies.
Woods
<End Quote>
See? Jean lost, no matter how much subsequent wriggling he attempted, Woods
just gave the SAME answer.
Well
why aren't you gone yet. Have you no shame or honor? You lost, you
leave!
See above, ***** boy.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fester" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
27 Jul 2004 08:13:15 PM |
|
|
yet you try and pick on someone else's typo.
It wasn't a typo. And you are too stupid to know what it was.
Are you saying that the misspelling wasn't innocuous?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cuan" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
27 Jul 2004 06:26:13 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:59:56 +0200, "tw" <no@no.com> wrote:
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0407261105.5201ef7a@posting.google.com...
AK <someoneNasty@hotmails.com> wrote in message
news:<hca9g0tgt1ok25v927i6lla0pvqpna302j@4ax.com>...
On 25 Jul 2004 21:12:07 GMT, Ignoramus14306
<ignoramus14306@NOSPAM.14306.invalid> wrote:
Getting their news from TV is not a sign of intelligence. Especially
when it comes to FOX news.
David Cole
Iinnocuously enough.
Impersonating others again AK? What a criminal you are.
What word is this? 'Iinnocuously ?'
MacDonald, I really don't understand why you insist on going down this road.
You are incapable of writing the simplest paragraph without multiple
grammatical and spelling errors yet you try and pick on someone else's typo.
You really are dumber than the dumbest bag of extremely dumb rocks. No
wonder you're still in school and playing with power rangers at your age.
A Georgetown University professor would not misspell some word he
obviously knows and uses often.
You probably meant 'Innocuously' theaf, criminal.
"Theaf"? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
fell on his sword, he did. :-)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
26 Jul 2004 07:07:34 PM |
|
|
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0407261105.5201ef7a@posting.google.com...
AK <someoneNasty@hotmails.com> wrote in message
news:<hca9g0tgt1ok25v927i6lla0pvqpna302j@4ax.com>...
On 25 Jul 2004 21:12:07 GMT, Ignoramus14306
<ignoramus14306@NOSPAM.14306.invalid> wrote:
Getting their news from TV is not a sign of intelligence. Especially
when it comes to FOX news.
David Cole
Iinnocuously enough.
Impersonating others again AK? What a criminal you are.
What word is this? 'Iinnocuously ?'
A Georgetown University professor would not misspell some word he
obviously knows and uses often.
Spelling flames are to responsible critiques what puns are to humor.
Regardless of who wrote the misspelled word, it was obviously a
typo. If you want to continue your flaming, try checking your other
post in this very thread.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
27 Jul 2004 06:45:18 AM |
|
|
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:a1hNc.176489$JR4.135393@attbi_s54...
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0407261105.5201ef7a@posting.google.com...
AK <someoneNasty@hotmails.com> wrote in message
news:<hca9g0tgt1ok25v927i6lla0pvqpna302j@4ax.com>...
On 25 Jul 2004 21:12:07 GMT, Ignoramus14306
<ignoramus14306@NOSPAM.14306.invalid> wrote:
Getting their news from TV is not a sign of intelligence. Especially
when it comes to FOX news.
David Cole
Iinnocuously enough.
Impersonating others again AK? What a criminal you are.
What word is this? 'Iinnocuously ?'
A Georgetown University professor would not misspell some word he
obviously knows and uses often.
Spelling flames are to responsible critiques what puns are to humor.
Regardless of who wrote the misspelled word, it was obviously a
typo. If you want to continue your flaming, try checking your other
post in this very thread.
Whoops...another thread with a similar subject.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Callipygian Nullifidian" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
27 Jul 2004 09:02:03 AM |
|
|
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:ifrNc.168169$%_6.105070@attbi_s01...
: "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in message
[snip]
: > Spelling flames are to responsible critiques what puns are to
humor.
: > Regardless of who wrote the misspelled word, it was obviously a
: > typo. If you want to continue your flaming, try checking your
other
: > post in this very thread.
:
: Whoops...another thread with a similar subject.
Not to quibble, but you've got to keep in mind the very real
difference between typographical errors and illiterate misspellings.
Illiterates deserve flames.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
03 Aug 2004 07:58:51 AM |
|
|
"Callipygian Nullifidian" <mulberry@ameritech.net> wrote in message
news:ce5n8r$gpb$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu...
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:ifrNc.168169$%_6.105070@attbi_s01...
: "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in message
[snip]
: > Spelling flames are to responsible critiques what puns are to
humor.
: > Regardless of who wrote the misspelled word, it was obviously a
: > typo. If you want to continue your flaming, try checking your
other
: > post in this very thread.
:
: Whoops...another thread with a similar subject.
Not to quibble, but you've got to keep in mind the very real
difference between typographical errors and illiterate misspellings.
Illiterates deserve flames.
An extra "i" in a word next to another one...it was obviously
a typo.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
27 Jul 2004 11:59:46 AM |
|
|
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in message news:<a1hNc.176489$JR4.135393@attbi_s54>...
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0407261105.5201ef7a@posting.google.com...
AK <someoneNasty@hotmails.com> wrote in message
news:<hca9g0tgt1ok25v927i6lla0pvqpna302j@4ax.com>...
On 25 Jul 2004 21:12:07 GMT, Ignoramus14306
<ignoramus14306@NOSPAM.14306.invalid> wrote:
Getting their news from TV is not a sign of intelligence. Especially
when it comes to FOX news.
David Cole
Iinnocuously enough.
Impersonating others again AK? What a criminal you are.
What word is this? 'Iinnocuously ?'
A Georgetown University professor would not misspell some word he
obviously knows and uses often.
Spelling flames are to responsible critiques what puns are to humor.
Try using a preposition next time in your sentence with the second
phrase, will ya? It needs it to be correct. Also the one you used,
in the first phrase, please take it out and put it in the correct
position next time retard. ;)
Regardless of who wrote the misspelled word, it was obviously a
typo.
My post had nothing to do with innocent typos.
Try to learn to read the post before you comment on it, next time.
Maybe you will not look as stupid as you are now. ;)
If you want to continue your flaming, try checking your other
post in this very thread.
I only posted once *****. Maybe you confused me with: 'Marvin The
Paranoid Android (marvin@galaxy.com)'
You are one retarded chap.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cuan" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
28 Jul 2004 03:27:48 AM |
|
|
On 27 Jul 2004 09:59:46 -0700, (Michael
Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in message news:<a1hNc.176489$JR4.135393@attbi_s54>...
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" < > wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0407261105.5201ef7a@posting.google.com...
AK <someoneNasty@hotmails.com> wrote in message
news:<hca9g0tgt1ok25v927i6lla0pvqpna302j@4ax.com>...
On 25 Jul 2004 21:12:07 GMT, Ignoramus14306
<ignoramus14306@NOSPAM.14306.invalid> wrote:
Getting their news from TV is not a sign of intelligence. Especially
when it comes to FOX news.
David Cole
Iinnocuously enough.
Impersonating others again AK? What a criminal you are.
What word is this? 'Iinnocuously ?'
A Georgetown University professor would not misspell some word he
obviously knows and uses often.
Spelling flames are to responsible critiques what puns are to humor.
Try using a preposition next time in your sentence with the second
phrase, will ya? It needs it to be correct. Also the one you used,
in the first phrase, please take it out and put it in the correct
position next time retard. ;)
No, Ronald. You're simply not intelligent enough to even *sound*
intelligent. Your grammatical errors are simply too obvious in your
previous posts to revere you as a scholar of the English language.
Perhaps you should put your dictionary and thesaurus away and visit
the Grade 1 classroom. A few 'writing strips' could assist you with
your spelling and formatting problems. The concept of prepositions is
simply way ahead of your time. You cannot run before you can walk.
Baby steps, remember that.
Regardless of who wrote the misspelled word, it was obviously a
typo.
My post had nothing to do with innocent typos.
Try to learn to read the post before you comment on it, next time.
Maybe you will not look as stupid as you are now. ;)
So you're also saying that Jean looked rather pathetic too - at least,
more than he usually does, since he's well known for overlooking
entire posts on occasion. Not only that, but when he's corrected, he
still doesn't grasp the imbedded humour in it. As for you: you might
read it all, but it still goes in one retina and shoots straight out
the other.
If you want to continue your flaming, try checking your other
post in this very thread.
I only posted once *****. Maybe you confused me with: 'Marvin The
Paranoid Android (marvin@galaxy.com)'
You are one retarded chap.
likewise, I'm sure.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ignoramus19431" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
26 Jul 2004 08:04:29 AM |
|
|
In article <hca9g0tgt1ok25v927i6lla0pvqpna302j@4ax.com>, AK wrote:
On 25 Jul 2004 21:12:07 GMT, Ignoramus14306
<ignoramus14306@NOSPAM.14306.invalid> wrote:
Getting their news from TV is not a sign of intelligence. Especially
when it comes to FOX news.
David Cole Iinnocuously enough. On Monday, June 21, a producer from
Fox News's The O'Reilly Factor called to ask me to appear as a guest
that evening to comment on a front-page story in the New York Times
claiming that the Bush Administration had overstated the value of
intelligence gained at Guant?namo and the dangers posed by the men
detained there. I'm generally not a fan of shout-television, and I
had declined several prior invitations to appear on O'Reilly's show,
but this time I said yes. Little did I know it would not only be my
first time, but also my last.
I sat in the Washington studio as the taping of the show began in
New York with a rant from Bill O'Reilly. He claimed that "the
Factor" had established the link between Al Qaeda and Saddam
Hussein, and then played a clip from Thomas Kean, head of the
Senate's 9/11 Commission, in which Kean said, "There is no evidence
that we can find whatsoever that Iraq or Saddam Hussein participated
in any way in attacks on the United States, in other words, on
9/11. What we do say, however, is there were contacts between Iraq
and Saddam Hussein. Iraq, Saddam--excuse me. Al Qaeda."
I was impressed. O'Reilly, who had announced his show as the "No
Spin Zone," was actually playing a balanced soundbite, one that
accurately reported the commission's findings both that there was no
evidence linking Saddam and 9/11, and that there was some evidence
of contacts (if no "collaborative relationship") between Saddam and
Al Qaeda. Maybe all those nasty things Al Franken had said about
O'Reilly weren't true after all.
But suddenly O'Reilly interrupted, plainly angry, and said, "We
can't use that.... We need to redo the whole thing." Three minutes
of silence later, the show began again, with O'Reilly re-recording
the introduction verbatim. Except this time, when he got to the part
about Kean, he played no tape, and simply paraphrased Kean as
confirming that "definitely there was a connection between Saddam
and Al Qaeda." The part about no link to 9/11 was left on the
cutting-room floor.
Now it was my turn. O'Reilly introduced the segment by complaining
that we are at war and need to be united, but that newspapers like
the New York Times are running biased stories, dividing the country
and aiding the enemy. "The spin must stop--our lives depend on it,"
O'Reilly gravely intoned. He then characterized the Times story that
day as claiming that the Guant?namo detainees were "innocent people"
and "harmless." He said the paper's article "questions holding the
detainees at Guant?namo."
I noted that the Times had said nothing of the sort. And I pointed
out that the article relied on a CIA study finding that the
detainees seemed to be low-level and had provided little valuable
intelligence.
That didn't convince O'Reilly, however, who again criticized the
Times for misleading its readers by terming the detainees innocent
and not dangerous. I replied that he was misleading his own viewers,
by exaggerating what the Times had said. "No, I'm not," he
retorted. So far, the usual fare on newstalk television.
But then I decided to go one step further: "It seems to me like the
pot calling the kettle black, Bill, because I just sat here five
minutes ago as you re-recorded the introduction to this show to take
out a statement from the head of the 9/11 commission stating that
there was no evidence of a link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11."
Apparently O'Reilly does not like being called "the pot." He
exploded, repeatedly called me an "S.O.B." and assured me that he
would cut my accusation from the interview when the show aired. He
also said I would "never ever" be on his show again. At this point,
I wasn't sure whether to take that as a threat or a promise.
Sure enough, when The O'Reilly Factor aired later that night, both
Thomas Kean's statement about 9/11 and my charge about O'Reilly
deleting it were missing. All that was left was Bill O'Reilly,
fuming at the liberal media's lack of objectivity and balance, and
ruing the divisive effect "spin" has on our national unity.
While the story you preented is interesting, an attentive person who
follows the news from news agencies, would figure out that something
like this is going on. When FOX news makes loud noise about "chemical
munitions" found in Iraq, and then ignores followup stories rebutting
their chemical nature, it is obvious that we are dealing with a
propaganda organization, rather than news organization.
Hence my conclusion, that only idiots trust FOX News.
Same idiots who support the Iraq war.
i
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gunner" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
26 Jul 2004 12:52:19 PM |
|
|
On 26 Jul 2004 13:04:29 GMT, Ignoramus19431
<ignoramus19431@NOSPAM.19431.invalid> wrote:
While the story you preented is interesting, an attentive person who
follows the news from news agencies, would figure out that something
like this is going on. When FOX news makes loud noise about "chemical
munitions" found in Iraq, and then ignores followup stories rebutting
their chemical nature, it is obvious that we are dealing with a
propaganda organization, rather than news organization.
Is this anything like exploding gas tanks?
Gunner
"At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child -
miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied,
demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless.
Liberalism is a philosphy of sniveling brats." -- P.J. O'Rourke
.
|
|
|
| User: "dangdongdoodle" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
02 Aug 2004 05:44:49 PM |
|
|
In article <l6hag05avrstot3hfr4k455solni3qhgv8@4ax.com>,
Gunner <gunner@lightspeed.net> wrote:
On 26 Jul 2004 13:04:29 GMT, Ignoramus19431
<ignoramus19431@NOSPAM.19431.invalid> wrote:
While the story you preented is interesting, an attentive person who
follows the news from news agencies, would figure out that something
like this is going on. When FOX news makes loud noise about "chemical
munitions" found in Iraq, and then ignores followup stories rebutting
their chemical nature, it is obvious that we are dealing with a
propaganda organization, rather than news organization.
Is this anything like exploding gas tanks?
Gunner
"At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child -
miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied,
demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless.
Liberalism is a philosphy of sniveling brats." -- P.J. O'Rourke
More like a firecracker in the shithouse.
--
Being a neo-con means never having to take responsibility
for all the crap you say or do.
They will habitually accuse you of doing the very thing they are doing to you.
Neo-cons have no respect for truth because they themselves are victims
of big lies. They constantly battle against reality, least the monster
of their own deceit gains the strength to shatter their illusions.
They struggle against nature and truth, not you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gunner" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
02 Aug 2004 08:02:54 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 15:44:49 -0700, dangdongdoodle
<noteathanks@islandnet.com> wrote:
In article <l6hag05avrstot3hfr4k455solni3qhgv8@4ax.com>,
Gunner <gunner@lightspeed.net> wrote:
On 26 Jul 2004 13:04:29 GMT, Ignoramus19431
<ignoramus19431@NOSPAM.19431.invalid> wrote:
While the story you preented is interesting, an attentive person who
follows the news from news agencies, would figure out that something
like this is going on. When FOX news makes loud noise about "chemical
munitions" found in Iraq, and then ignores followup stories rebutting
their chemical nature, it is obvious that we are dealing with a
propaganda organization, rather than news organization.
Is this anything like exploding gas tanks?
Gunner
"At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child -
miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied,
demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless.
Liberalism is a philosphy of sniveling brats." -- P.J. O'Rourke
More like a firecracker in the shithouse.
So the exploding gas tank bit from a major news media was not
propaganda?
Of course..we also have the Mr. Potato head version of Leni
Reifenstal ...Jabba the Moore.
Snicker.....
"There is no difference between communism and socialism, except
in the means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism
proposes to enslave men by force, socialism - by vote. It is
merely the difference between murder and suicide."
- Ayn Rand, from "Foreign Policy Drains U.S. of Main
Weapons"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
04 Aug 2004 10:29:48 AM |
|
|
dangdongdoodle wrote:
[piggybacking
In article <l6hag05avrstot3hfr4k455solni3qhgv8@4ax.com>,
Gunner <gunner@lightspeed.net> wrote:
On 26 Jul 2004 13:04:29 GMT, Ignoramus19431
<ignoramus19431@NOSPAM.19431.invalid> wrote:
While the story you preented is interesting, an attentive person who
follows the news from news agencies, would figure out that something
like this is going on. When FOX news makes loud noise about
"chemical munitions" found in Iraq, and then ignores followup
stories rebutting their chemical nature, it is obvious that we are
dealing with a propaganda organization, rather than news
organization.
Is this anything like exploding gas tanks?
Gunner
"At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child -
miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied,
demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless.
Liberalism is a philosphy of sniveling brats." -- P.J. O'Rourke
( commenting on amusing sig)
And it describes the current administration perfectly.
More like a firecracker in the shithouse.
--
Being a neo-con means never having to take responsibility
for all the crap you say or do.
They will habitually accuse you of doing the very thing they are doing
to you.
Neo-cons have no respect for truth because they themselves are victims
of big lies. They constantly battle against reality, least the
monster of their own deceit gains the strength to shatter their
illusions.
They struggle against nature and truth, not you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gunner" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
04 Aug 2004 10:08:24 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 08:29:48 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
"At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child -
miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied,
demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless.
Liberalism is a philosphy of sniveling brats." -- P.J. O'Rourke
( commenting on amusing sig)
And it describes the current administration perfectly.
Of which nation? Or are you still living in the late 90s?
Gunner
"In my humble opinion, the petty carping levied against Bush by
the Democrats proves again, it is better to have your eye plucked
out by an eagle than to be nibbled to death by ducks." - Norman
Liebmann
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
10 Aug 2004 12:54:49 AM |
|
|
On 25 Jul 2004 21:12:07 GMT, Ignoramus14306
<ignoramus14306@NOSPAM.14306.invalid> wrote:
Getting their news from TV is not a sign of intelligence. Especially
when it comes to FOX news.
Well golly...
Will you tell us why *Ignoramus* 14306?
atheist@home#1554
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
27 Jul 2004 04:48:13 AM |
|
|
On 25 Jul 2004 21:12:07 GMT, Ignoramus14306 <ignoramus14306@NOSPAM.14306.invalid> wrote:
Getting their news from TV is not a sign of intelligence. Especially
when it comes to FOX news.
It's the same news used by the 'rats, ignoramus. Or didn't you understand that?
duke
*****
Matthew 11
28"Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened,
and I will give you rest. 29Take my yoke upon you
and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in
heart, and you will find rest for your souls.
30For my yoke is easy and my burden is light."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Callipygian Nullifidian" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
27 Jul 2004 08:58:47 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:o59cg01ffhkgn7l0o4cn3onbc4g3pbgfsq@4ax.com...
: On 25 Jul 2004 21:12:07 GMT, Ignoramus14306
<ignoramus14306@NOSPAM.14306.invalid> wrote:
:
: >Getting their news from TV is not a sign of intelligence.
Especially
: >when it comes to FOX news.
:
: It's the same news used by the 'rats, ignoramus. Or didn't you
understand that?
:
: duke
Careful people, don't step in the dukey.....
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ignoramus25231" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
27 Jul 2004 07:58:59 AM |
|
|
In article <o59cg01ffhkgn7l0o4cn3onbc4g3pbgfsq@4ax.com>, duke wrote:
On 25 Jul 2004 21:12:07 GMT, Ignoramus14306 <ignoramus14306@NOSPAM.14306.invalid> wrote:
Getting their news from TV is not a sign of intelligence. Especially
when it comes to FOX news.
It's the same news used by the 'rats, ignoramus. Or didn't you
understand that?
Well, duh, there is plenty of verty stupid democrats also, I am
surprised you did not realize that.
Remember this rule of thumb: if a person gets his or her news from TV,
he or she is an idiot, irrespective of party affiliation.
If he gets news from FOX news, he is a double idiot. It is a
particularly bad network, not that others are much better. Just a tad,
but they are all junk.
i
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Idiots trust FOX NEWS |
27 Jul 2004 05:27:03 PM |
|
|
On 27 Jul 2004 12:58:59 GMT, Ignoramus25231 <ignoramus25231@NOSPAM.25231.invalid> wrote:
Well, duh, there is plenty of verty stupid democrats also, I am
surprised you did not realize that.
Oh, I realize it.
Remember this rule of thumb: if a person gets his or her news from TV,
he or she is an idiot, irrespective of party affiliation.
No kidding!!!! So where do you get your news?
If he gets news from FOX news, he is a double idiot. It is a
particularly bad network, not that others are much better. Just a tad,
but they are all junk.
Oh? After all, they *are* fair and balanced. I've seen the liberal media in operation in
the other news groups. What a sham they are.
duke
*****
Matthew 11
28"Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened,
and I will give you rest. 29Take my yoke upon you
and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in
heart, and you will find rest for your souls.
30For my yoke is easy and my burden is light."
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|