"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040512115325.20472.00000886@mb-m21.aol.com...
Inspector: Saddam had WMD on 'short notice'
Report by new director of survey group cites new, hard evidence
Put the whip down and leave that poor dead horse alone, Tony.
Posted: May 12, 2004
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2004 WorldNetDaily.com
A document leaked by U.S. inspectors presents hard evidence Saddam Hussein
could have unleashed biological and chemical weapons on foreign nations
"at
short notice."
The report by Charles Duelfer, the new director of the Iraq Survey group,
said
there is evidence the ousted Iraqi dictator was plotting to expand his
facilities last year, before the invasion of British and American troops,
the
Scotsman reported.
Wow! What a GREAT report! What COMPELLING evidence! What will those
UNPATRIOTIC LIBERALS say now?
Hmm, I could do with some firmer, yonger skin and maybe some life insurance.
SPONSORED LINKS
Get Younger, Firmer Skin
Our clinically proven anti-aging skin care with copper-peptides and
retinol
visibly reduces wrinkles and age spots, firms the jawline and eye area,
and
restores your youthful radiance. Free shipping.
www.oo-la-lah.com
Fastest Term Life Insurance - 10 Minutes
Inexpensive rates. Highly advanced life insurance system. No doctor's
office
visit, no blood or urine samples. Get covered in 10 minutes. Manage your
insurance online.
www.termsite.com
Ah! That's better.
Duelfer presents what he calls "new information" on Saddam's military
build-up,
the newspaper said.
"Iraq did have facilities suitable for the production of biological and
chemical agents needed for weapons," Duelfer states. "It had plans to
improve
and expand and even build new facilities."
I doubt it, especially seeing as these facilities haven't been found.
The report refers to new evidence testing was done on long-range
ballistic
missiles and on a commercial biopesticide, which can be used as anthrax.
A pesticide which can be used as anthrax?! That's as ridiculous as saying DU
ammo is a kind of HEAT round!
Duelfer's report, which has been sent to Congress, is his first after
taking
over in February for David Kay.
Critics of the war already have questioned Duelfer's findings, charging
the new
inspector has changed the criteria for finding weapons of mass
destruction,
shifting from hard evidence to signs of "intent."
Well, exactly.
The numerous United Nations resolutions passed before the war put the
burden of
proof on Saddam Hussein to demonstrate he did not have the weapons or the
programs.
But you can't prove a negative can you?
<snip unsubstantiated assertions and standard WorldNutDaily irrelevence>
.