| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"lkgeo1" |
| Date: |
21 Sep 2006 10:26:20 AM |
| Object: |
Iran Confrontation Inevitable "If this man represents the prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are |
Iran Confrontation Inevitable
"If this man represents the
prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are
heading for a massive confrontation with Iran." . . . said by a
member of
the Council on Foreign Relations at their recent meeting with
Ahmadinejad.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/world/middleeast/21iran.html?th&emc=th
.
|
|
| User: "eric" |
|
| Title: Re: Iran Confrontation Inevitable "If this man represents the prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are |
21 Sep 2006 11:39:31 AM |
|
|
lkgeo1 wrote:
Iran Confrontation Inevitable
"If this man represents the
prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are
heading for a massive confrontation with Iran." . . . said by a
member of
the Council on Foreign Relations at their recent meeting with
Ahmadinejad.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/world/middleeast/21iran.html?th&emc=th
Nonsense.
USA developed nuclear weapons so of course the Soviet Union did as
well. Israel has nuclear weapons, so of course Iran will as well. In
fact there already is a Muslim bomb in Pakistan, and Pakistan is far
more unstable than Iran. The government of Pakistan could be
overthrown by extremist elements within the army at any time. Then
there would be a problem, as the extremist elements in Pakistan are far
more radical than the current Iranian regime.
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Iran Confrontation Inevitable "If this man represents the prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are |
21 Sep 2006 12:40:32 PM |
|
|
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158856771.212676.163630@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
lkgeo1 wrote:
Iran Confrontation Inevitable
"If this man represents the
prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are
heading for a massive confrontation with Iran." . . . said by a
member of
the Council on Foreign Relations at their recent meeting with
Ahmadinejad.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/world/middleeast/21iran.html?th&emc=th
Nonsense.
USA developed nuclear weapons so of course the Soviet Union did as
well. Israel has nuclear weapons, so of course Iran will as well. In
fact there already is a Muslim bomb in Pakistan, and Pakistan is far
more unstable than Iran. The government of Pakistan could be
overthrown by extremist elements within the army at any time. Then
there would be a problem, as the extremist elements in Pakistan are far
more radical than the current Iranian regime.
America can vaporeze them both at the same time at the press of a button.
.
|
|
|
| User: "dreamwalker" |
|
| Title: Re: Iran Confrontation Inevitable "If this man represents the prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are |
21 Sep 2006 11:37:42 PM |
|
|
"mukyuk" <mukyuk@mukyuk.com> wrote in message news:k8AQg.7937$5R2.6398@pd7urf3no...
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158856771.212676.163630@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
lkgeo1 wrote:
Iran Confrontation Inevitable
"If this man represents the
prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are
heading for a massive confrontation with Iran." . . . said by a
member of
the Council on Foreign Relations at their recent meeting with
Ahmadinejad.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/world/middleeast/21iran.html?th&emc=th
Nonsense.
USA developed nuclear weapons so of course the Soviet Union did as
well. Israel has nuclear weapons, so of course Iran will as well. In
fact there already is a Muslim bomb in Pakistan, and Pakistan is far
more unstable than Iran. The government of Pakistan could be
overthrown by extremist elements within the army at any time. Then
there would be a problem, as the extremist elements in Pakistan are far
more radical than the current Iranian regime.
America can vaporeze them both at the same time at the press of a button.
Poof! Life is good.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Wally_Lorne=99?=" |
|
| Title: Re: Iran Confrontation Inevitable "If this man represents the prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are |
22 Sep 2006 12:05:37 AM |
|
|
http://vialls.com/myahudi/sunburn.html
HOOROO !!!!
UNCLE WALLY
----0----
mukyuk wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158856771.212676.163630@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
lkgeo1 wrote:
Iran Confrontation Inevitable
"If this man represents the
prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are
heading for a massive confrontation with Iran." . . . said by a
member of
the Council on Foreign Relations at their recent meeting with
Ahmadinejad.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/world/middleeast/21iran.html?th&emc=th
Nonsense.
USA developed nuclear weapons so of course the Soviet Union did as
well. Israel has nuclear weapons, so of course Iran will as well. In
fact there already is a Muslim bomb in Pakistan, and Pakistan is far
more unstable than Iran. The government of Pakistan could be
overthrown by extremist elements within the army at any time. Then
there would be a problem, as the extremist elements in Pakistan are far
more radical than the current Iranian regime.
America can vaporeze them both at the same time at the press of a button.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "eric" |
|
| Title: Re: Iran Confrontation Inevitable "If this man represents the prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are |
22 Sep 2006 11:39:16 AM |
|
|
mukyuk wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158856771.212676.163630@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
lkgeo1 wrote:
Iran Confrontation Inevitable
"If this man represents the
prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are
heading for a massive confrontation with Iran." . . . said by a
member of
the Council on Foreign Relations at their recent meeting with
Ahmadinejad.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/world/middleeast/21iran.html?th&emc=th
Nonsense.
USA developed nuclear weapons so of course the Soviet Union did as
well. Israel has nuclear weapons, so of course Iran will as well. In
fact there already is a Muslim bomb in Pakistan, and Pakistan is far
more unstable than Iran. The government of Pakistan could be
overthrown by extremist elements within the army at any time. Then
there would be a problem, as the extremist elements in Pakistan are far
more radical than the current Iranian regime.
America can vaporeze them both at the same time at the press of a button.
So? What's your point?
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Iran Confrontation Inevitable "If this man represents the prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are |
22 Sep 2006 03:10:36 PM |
|
|
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158943156.845066.94790@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
mukyuk wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158856771.212676.163630@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
lkgeo1 wrote:
Iran Confrontation Inevitable
"If this man represents the
prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are
heading for a massive confrontation with Iran." . . . said by a
member of
the Council on Foreign Relations at their recent meeting with
Ahmadinejad.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/world/middleeast/21iran.html?th&emc=th
Nonsense.
USA developed nuclear weapons so of course the Soviet Union did as
well. Israel has nuclear weapons, so of course Iran will as well. In
fact there already is a Muslim bomb in Pakistan, and Pakistan is far
more unstable than Iran. The government of Pakistan could be
overthrown by extremist elements within the army at any time. Then
there would be a problem, as the extremist elements in Pakistan are far
more radical than the current Iranian regime.
America can vaporeze them both at the same time at the press of a button.
So? What's your point?
No point was intended. I was just simply stating a fact!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "dreamwalker" |
|
| Title: Re: Iran Confrontation Inevitable "If this man represents the prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are |
22 Sep 2006 06:02:38 PM |
|
|
"mukyuk" <mukyuk@mukyuk.com> wrote in message news:0rXQg.12539$R63.12468@pd7urf1no...
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158943156.845066.94790@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
mukyuk wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158856771.212676.163630@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
lkgeo1 wrote:
Iran Confrontation Inevitable
"If this man represents the
prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are
heading for a massive confrontation with Iran." . . . said by a
member of
the Council on Foreign Relations at their recent meeting with
Ahmadinejad.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/world/middleeast/21iran.html?th&emc=th
Nonsense.
USA developed nuclear weapons so of course the Soviet Union did as
well. Israel has nuclear weapons, so of course Iran will as well. In
fact there already is a Muslim bomb in Pakistan, and Pakistan is far
more unstable than Iran. The government of Pakistan could be
overthrown by extremist elements within the army at any time. Then
there would be a problem, as the extremist elements in Pakistan are far
more radical than the current Iranian regime.
America can vaporeze them both at the same time at the press of a button.
So? What's your point?
No point was intended. I was just simply stating a fact!!!
Israel has the big boys. Thermonuclear city killers. Iran will be lucky if they could crap out a
deliverable 10 kiloton device. If Israel was smart, they'd act now.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Iran Confrontation Inevitable "If this man represents the prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are |
22 Sep 2006 06:59:44 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:02:38 -0500, dreamwalker wrote:
"mukyuk" <mukyuk@mukyuk.com> wrote in message news:0rXQg.12539$R63.12468@pd7urf1no...
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158943156.845066.94790@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
mukyuk wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158856771.212676.163630@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
lkgeo1 wrote:
Iran Confrontation Inevitable
"If this man represents the
prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are
heading for a massive confrontation with Iran." . . . said by a
member of
the Council on Foreign Relations at their recent meeting with
Ahmadinejad.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/world/middleeast/21iran.html?th&emc=th
Nonsense.
USA developed nuclear weapons so of course the Soviet Union did as
well. Israel has nuclear weapons, so of course Iran will as well. In
fact there already is a Muslim bomb in Pakistan, and Pakistan is far
more unstable than Iran. The government of Pakistan could be
overthrown by extremist elements within the army at any time. Then
there would be a problem, as the extremist elements in Pakistan are far
more radical than the current Iranian regime.
America can vaporeze them both at the same time at the press of a button.
So? What's your point?
No point was intended. I was just simply stating a fact!!!
Israel has the big boys. Thermonuclear city killers. Iran will be lucky if they could crap out a
deliverable 10 kiloton device. If Israel was smart, they'd act now.
Assuming that there is no choice but to have some
kind of violence against Iran in order to preclude their having nuclear
weapons, which I don't think is an accurate assumption (but for the sake
of argument, let's assume that) .... I really think Israel would be much
better off to clandestinely plant much mistrust between the Persians and
Arabs, and have the Arab Muslims take 'em out. Exploiting an existing
mistrust would (1)leave Israel out of the crosshairs (assuming nobody
finds out they were instigating trouble and (2)keep the Muslim countries
in the Middle East focused on someone other than them.
Of course, as I've said, I don't think it necessarily needs to come to
violence. (Not yet, anyway ... can't say when we'll pass the point of no
return on that).
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "dreamwalker" |
|
| Title: Re: Iran Confrontation Inevitable "If this man represents the prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are |
22 Sep 2006 10:57:55 PM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.09.22.23.59.42.851831@tepidmail.com...
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:02:38 -0500, dreamwalker wrote:
"mukyuk" <mukyuk@mukyuk.com> wrote in message news:0rXQg.12539$R63.12468@pd7urf1no...
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158943156.845066.94790@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
mukyuk wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158856771.212676.163630@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
lkgeo1 wrote:
Iran Confrontation Inevitable
"If this man represents the
prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are
heading for a massive confrontation with Iran." . . . said by a
member of
the Council on Foreign Relations at their recent meeting with
Ahmadinejad.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/world/middleeast/21iran.html?th&emc=th
Nonsense.
USA developed nuclear weapons so of course the Soviet Union did as
well. Israel has nuclear weapons, so of course Iran will as well. In
fact there already is a Muslim bomb in Pakistan, and Pakistan is far
more unstable than Iran. The government of Pakistan could be
overthrown by extremist elements within the army at any time. Then
there would be a problem, as the extremist elements in Pakistan are far
more radical than the current Iranian regime.
America can vaporeze them both at the same time at the press of a button.
So? What's your point?
No point was intended. I was just simply stating a fact!!!
Israel has the big boys. Thermonuclear city killers. Iran will be lucky if they could crap out a
deliverable 10 kiloton device. If Israel was smart, they'd act now.
Assuming that there is no choice but to have some
kind of violence against Iran in order to preclude their having nuclear
weapons, which I don't think is an accurate assumption (but for the sake
of argument, let's assume that) .... I really think Israel would be much
better off to clandestinely plant much mistrust between the Persians and
Arabs, and have the Arab Muslims take 'em out. Exploiting an existing
mistrust would (1)leave Israel out of the crosshairs (assuming nobody
finds out they were instigating trouble and (2)keep the Muslim countries
in the Middle East focused on someone other than them.
Of course, as I've said, I don't think it necessarily needs to come to
violence. (Not yet, anyway ... can't say when we'll pass the point of no
return on that).
Woods
Good points.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "eric" |
|
| Title: Re: Iran Confrontation Inevitable "If this man represents the prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are |
22 Sep 2006 03:52:28 PM |
|
|
mukyuk wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158943156.845066.94790@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
mukyuk wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158856771.212676.163630@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
lkgeo1 wrote:
Iran Confrontation Inevitable
"If this man represents the
prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are
heading for a massive confrontation with Iran." . . . said by a
member of
the Council on Foreign Relations at their recent meeting with
Ahmadinejad.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/world/middleeast/21iran.html?th&emc=th
Nonsense.
USA developed nuclear weapons so of course the Soviet Union did as
well. Israel has nuclear weapons, so of course Iran will as well. In
fact there already is a Muslim bomb in Pakistan, and Pakistan is far
more unstable than Iran. The government of Pakistan could be
overthrown by extremist elements within the army at any time. Then
there would be a problem, as the extremist elements in Pakistan are far
more radical than the current Iranian regime.
America can vaporeze them both at the same time at the press of a button.
So? What's your point?
No point was intended. I was just simply stating a fact!!!
That's right, there is no point. Since it has always been understood
that given two nuclear powers, if one nukes the other, then there will
be a nuke response. Nothing new. Iran with nukes would be an
insurance policy against Israeli aggression, and merely evens the
playing field.
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Iran Confrontation Inevitable "If this man represents the prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are |
22 Sep 2006 05:02:41 PM |
|
|
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158958348.264742.202480@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
mukyuk wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158943156.845066.94790@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
mukyuk wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158856771.212676.163630@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
lkgeo1 wrote:
Iran Confrontation Inevitable
"If this man represents the
prevailing government opinion in Tehran, we are
heading for a massive confrontation with Iran." . . . said by a
member of
the Council on Foreign Relations at their recent meeting with
Ahmadinejad.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/world/middleeast/21iran.html?th&emc=th
Nonsense.
USA developed nuclear weapons so of course the Soviet Union did as
well. Israel has nuclear weapons, so of course Iran will as well.
In
fact there already is a Muslim bomb in Pakistan, and Pakistan is far
more unstable than Iran. The government of Pakistan could be
overthrown by extremist elements within the army at any time. Then
there would be a problem, as the extremist elements in Pakistan are
far
more radical than the current Iranian regime.
America can vaporeze them both at the same time at the press of a
button.
So? What's your point?
No point was intended. I was just simply stating a fact!!!
That's right, there is no point. Since it has always been understood
that given two nuclear powers, if one nukes the other,
then there will be a nuke response.
There won't be anyone left to 'respond'....
Nothing new. Iran with nukes would be an
insurance policy against Israeli aggression, and merely evens the
playing field.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
