"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1144158167.400283.238200@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

George skrev:

"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1144155438.764021.37230@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

George skrev:

"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1144149310.357022.292320@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

George skrev:

"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1144080023.592125.24010@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

George skrev:

"Purple Microdot" <totally@tripping.balls.com> wrote in message
news:Nx5Yf.51352$2O6.32502@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...

The Last 2452 daysT ? wrote...

http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/spages/701509.html

Last update - 13:47 02/04/2006


Iran said set to respond to U.S. strike with global terror

By Reuters

Iran would respond to U.S. military strikes against its nuclear
sites
with global attacks by intelligence operatives and Hezbollah
teams,
The
Washington Post reported in an article on its Web site on
Saturday,
citing unnamed "intelligence and terrorism experts."

Why is attacking Iran considered a "pre-emptive strike," while
Iran
fighting back is described as "terrorism?"

If we were to use terrorists to commit a "pre-emptive" strike, you
might
have a case for calling it something different. Iran has spelled
out
that
it would use well-known terrorist organizations (such as Hizbulla=

and
Islamic Jihad) to carry out strikes against civilians. Hence,
their
terrorist attacks would be called terrorism. What part of that do
you
not
understand?

George=A8

A "pre-emptive strike" IS terrorism.

If I see you threatening to knife my child, and I blow your brains
out,
is
that terrorism?

George

Fuckin' idiot yank! Not even near a comparison. Try being serious...or
try thinking on the same level.

WH

Wow, an ad hominem. Is that a typical European response, or do you
have
anger management issues?

None of the above!

I see.

It's a appropriate comparison, Bollogs. Just
because it doesn't agree with whatever agenda you are pushing doesn't
mean
it isn't a valid comparison.

Explain why it's a valid comparison then...go on do your best! Attack a
country and rob it's oil is comparable to some nut threatening your
child with a knife. How is that then yank?

As soon as you stop the sophmoric "yank" bit, and take your blood
pressure
medicine.

You are a yank aren't you?

Strictly speaking, I am an American. Yanks live in the north. Do you ne=

geography lessons as well?

Is this all you have? Please tell me this
isn't all you have. I'd be greatly disappointed. Oh, and why would I
want
to think on your level? I understand that Saddam has now been charged
with
genocide. Congratulations. One of your heroes is toast.

George

Great yankie response I see...a la pantyboy! One of 'my' hero's...where
did that come from? It's said that Saddam was responsible for the
deaths of approx. 500,000 people. During thirty years of power. Yanks
have occupied Iraq for three years with approx. 100,000 dead.

Wrong, but then, you knew that.

Show me where I'm wrong...and put me right with your yankie propaganda
numbers! Are you sure you're not pantyboy?

WH

http://www.iraqbodycount.net/

Are you sure you're not 9 years old?

"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1144252594.285384.68430@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Steven Douglas skrev:

WH wrote:

George skrev:

"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1144149310.357022.292320@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

George skrev:

"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1144080023.592125.24010@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

George skrev:

"Purple Microdot" <totally@tripping.balls.com> wrote in message
news:Nx5Yf.51352$2O6.32502@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...

The Last 2452 daysT ? wrote...

http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/spages/701509.html

Last update - 13:47 02/04/2006


Iran said set to respond to U.S. strike with global terror

By Reuters

Iran would respond to U.S. military strikes against its
nuclear
sites
with global attacks by intelligence operatives and Hezbollah
teams,
The
Washington Post reported in an article on its Web site on
Saturday,
citing unnamed "intelligence and terrorism experts."

Why is attacking Iran considered a "pre-emptive strike," while
Iran
fighting back is described as "terrorism?"

If we were to use terrorists to commit a "pre-emptive" strike,
you
might
have a case for calling it something different. Iran has spell=

out
that
it would use well-known terrorist organizations (such as
Hizbullah, and
Islamic Jihad) to carry out strikes against civilians. Hence,
their
terrorist attacks would be called terrorism. What part of that
do you
not
understand?

George=A8

A "pre-emptive strike" IS terrorism.

If I see you threatening to knife my child, and I blow your brains
out,
is
that terrorism?

George

Fuckin' idiot yank! Not even near a comparison. Try being
serious...or
try thinking on the same level.

WH

Wow, an ad hominem. Is that a typical European response, or do you
have
anger management issues?

None of the above!

It's a appropriate comparison, Bollogs. Just
because it doesn't agree with whatever agenda you are pushing doesn=

mean
it isn't a valid comparison.

Explain why it's a valid comparison then...go on do your best! Attack=

country and rob it's oil is comparable to some nut threatening your
child with a knife. How is that then yank?

Is this all you have? Please tell me this
isn't all you have. I'd be greatly disappointed. Oh, and why would
I want
to think on your level? I understand that Saddam has now been
charged with
genocide. Congratulations. One of your heroes is toast.

George

Great yankie response I see...a la pantyboy! One of 'my' hero's...whe=

did that come from? It's said that Saddam was responsible for the
deaths of approx. 500,000 people. During thirty years of power. Yanks
have occupied Iraq for three years with approx. 100,000 dead.

Why are you going back to that ridiculous 100,000 number when you
posted something completely different last July?

The Iraq body count site is an estimation of the amount of deaths based
on reported deaths in Iraq. There are no facts on that site. But let's
put it this way, their estimate has got to be the least amount of
people killed since the invasion. These days it's estimated that over
100 people are being killed every day...the ones that are found that
is. Because there is in effect a civil war raging in Iraq now...at
least in Baghdad.

By the way douglas, last July was almost 9 months ago!

WH

By the way, WH. You've not provided one shred of evidence to back up your
claims, while the two of us have. I wonder why that is. Umm, perhaps
because you have no evidence to support your claim. No big surprises her=

George

"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1144252594.285384.68430@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Steven Douglas skrev:

WH wrote:

George skrev:

"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1144149310.357022.292320@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

George skrev:

"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1144080023.592125.24010@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

George skrev:

"Purple Microdot" <totally@tripping.balls.com> wrote in message
news:Nx5Yf.51352$2O6.32502@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...

The Last 2452 daysT ? wrote...

http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/spages/701509.html

Last update - 13:47 02/04/2006


Iran said set to respond to U.S. strike with global terror

By Reuters

Iran would respond to U.S. military strikes against its
nuclear
sites
with global attacks by intelligence operatives and Hezbollah
teams,
The
Washington Post reported in an article on its Web site on
Saturday,
citing unnamed "intelligence and terrorism experts."

Why is attacking Iran considered a "pre-emptive strike," while
Iran
fighting back is described as "terrorism?"

If we were to use terrorists to commit a "pre-emptive" strike,
you
might
have a case for calling it something different. Iran has spelled
out
that
it would use well-known terrorist organizations (such as
Hizbullah, and
Islamic Jihad) to carry out strikes against civilians. Hence,
their
terrorist attacks would be called terrorism. What part of that
do you
not
understand?

George¨

A "pre-emptive strike" IS terrorism.

If I see you threatening to knife my child, and I blow your brains
out,
is
that terrorism?

George

Fuckin' idiot yank! Not even near a comparison. Try being
serious...or
try thinking on the same level.

WH

Wow, an ad hominem. Is that a typical European response, or do you
have
anger management issues?

None of the above!

It's a appropriate comparison, Bollogs. Just
because it doesn't agree with whatever agenda you are pushing doesn't
mean
it isn't a valid comparison.

Explain why it's a valid comparison then...go on do your best! Attack a
country and rob it's oil is comparable to some nut threatening your
child with a knife. How is that then yank?

Is this all you have? Please tell me this
isn't all you have. I'd be greatly disappointed. Oh, and why would
I want
to think on your level? I understand that Saddam has now been
charged with
genocide. Congratulations. One of your heroes is toast.

George

Great yankie response I see...a la pantyboy! One of 'my' hero's...where
did that come from? It's said that Saddam was responsible for the
deaths of approx. 500,000 people. During thirty years of power. Yanks
have occupied Iraq for three years with approx. 100,000 dead.

Why are you going back to that ridiculous 100,000 number when you
posted something completely different last July?

The Iraq body count site is an estimation of the amount of deaths based
on reported deaths in Iraq. There are no facts on that site. But let's
put it this way, their estimate has got to be the least amount of
people killed since the invasion. These days it's estimated that over
100 people are being killed every day...the ones that are found that
is. Because there is in effect a civil war raging in Iraq now...at
least in Baghdad.

By the way douglas, last July was almost 9 months ago!

WH

By the way, WH. You've not provided one shred of evidence to back up your
claims, while the two of us have. I wonder why that is. Umm, perhaps
because you have no evidence to support your claim. No big surprises here.

George