I mean a while back when Susan said that's what it was,
she denied it, now she posts showing us all a letter she
sent to AOL and she signed it as "Dani Bell".
Inquiring minds want to know.
Maybe I can get a few "wizards or magicians" as Amy
calls them to let us all know. Afterall, why should Amy be the
only one to use such people?
Tony
.
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
28 May 2004 08:53:24 AM |
|
|
On 28 May 2004 10:53:50 GMT, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
I mean a while back when Susan said that's what it was,
she denied it, now she posts showing us all a letter she
sent to AOL and she signed it as "Dani Bell".
Inquiring minds want to know.
No, sweetie - I think only *you* want to know. Bell is my
ex-husband's last name.. the name I took when I got married. It's not
my Maiden last name. My Maiden last name is of Irish descent; while
Bell is more of Scottish descent.
Satisfied? Would you also like a sample of my DNA?
Freak.
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
28 May 2004 09:09:00 AM |
|
|
Dani
wrote:
Would you also like a sample of my >DNA?
No thanks, I don't want to be contaminated; but I'm sure that your ghoulish
friend Amy has procured a sample of mine.
You want to accuse someone of digging up things, talk to your pal Amy.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
28 May 2004 04:34:53 PM |
|
|
On 28 May 2004 14:09:00 GMT, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
Would you also like a sample of my DNA?
No thanks, I don't want to be contaminated;
Contaminated with what? First of all there's nothing wrong with me
that would contaminate you, and secondly are you so stupid that you
think testing a sample of my DNA means *sharing/mixing* my DNA with
yours? Christ, are you an idiot.
but I'm sure that your ghoulish
friend Amy has procured a sample of mine.
Amy has every right in the world to loathe you, Tony. The Cancer
campaign was beyond vile. Don't you dare try to play innocent with
that.
You want to accuse someone of digging up things, talk to your pal Amy.
Is Amy starting new threads inquiring about your last name? No.
You're a little boy in a giant grown man's body. You say and do the
most ludicrous things I've ever seen someone do. Just look at all the
threads of yours today. That's how a 46 year old acts? That's both
sad and scary. Sad because you've obviously got major issues, and
scary for someone my age to see because I've always been of the belief
that people mature and grow-up! Are you my future? LOL!
Get help. Seriously.
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
29 May 2004 08:25:03 AM |
|
|
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
Would you also like a sample of my DNA?
No thanks, I don't want to be >>contaminated;
Contaminated with what? First of all there's nothing wrong with me
that would contaminate you, and secondly are you so stupid that you
think testing a sample of my DNA means *sharing/mixing* my DNA with
yours? Christ, are you an idiot.
No, you;re the idiot, no one mentioned anything about "sharing/mixing", that's
all in your dense little head.
but I'm sure that your ghoulish
friend Amy has procured a sample of >>mine.
Amy has every right in the world to loathe >you, Tony. The Cancer
campaign was beyond vile.
But you forget what that was in response to. It was not an unprovoked attack,
Amy had it coming.
You want to accuse someone of digging >>up things, talk to your pal Amy.
Is Amy starting new threads inquiring >about your last name?
Hey Stupid, she's already done so and even now is requesting more help from
"wizards" to find out info on me.
You owe everything you're getting to Amy.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
29 May 2004 08:34:29 PM |
|
|
On 29 May 2004 13:25:03 GMT, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
Would you also like a sample of my DNA?
No thanks, I don't want to be >>contaminated;
Contaminated with what? First of all there's nothing wrong with me
that would contaminate you, and secondly are you so stupid that you
think testing a sample of my DNA means *sharing/mixing* my DNA with
yours? Christ, are you an idiot.
No, you;re the idiot, no one mentioned anything about "sharing/mixing", that's
all in your dense little head.
Errrr.. you said you didn't want to get contaminated by testing my
DNA. If you had even 1/4 of a brain you would know that my DNA would
have to be mixed with yours for you to get contaminated if I had
anything wrong.
but I'm sure that your ghoulish
friend Amy has procured a sample of mine.
Amy has every right in the world to loathe you, Tony. The Cancer
campaign was beyond vile.
But you forget what that was in response to. It was not an unprovoked attack,
Amy had it coming.
Oh *****! Nothing and I repeat nothing warrants what you said in
regards to her husband's Cancer. Some things you just don't say.
You want to accuse someone of digging up things, talk to your pal Amy.
Is Amy starting new threads inquiring >about your last name?
Hey Stupid, she's already done so and even now is requesting more help from
"wizards" to find out info on me.
You owe everything you're getting to Amy.
And what am I getting? Do you mean when this "anonymous" AOL user
who so coincidently just *happens* to know information about me (that
of course I've only given out on this group..) plants posts in sex
groups pretending to be me - it's all 'cause of Amy, ha?
That's what you meant to say. And I just wonder why you'd say it.
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
30 May 2004 08:43:55 AM |
|
|
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
Would you also like a sample of my DNA?
No thanks, I don't want to be >>contaminated;
Contaminated with what? First of all there's nothing wrong with me
that would contaminate you, and secondly are you so stupid that you
think testing a sample of my DNA means *sharing/mixing* my DNA with
yours? Christ, are you an idiot.
No, you;re the idiot, no one mentioned anything about "sharing/mixing",
that's
all in your dense little head.
Errrr.. you said you didn't want to get contaminated by testing my
DNA. If you had even 1/4 of a brain you would know that my DNA would
have to be mixed with yours for you to get contaminated if I had
anything wrong.
Wrong.
Just handling a sample of your DNA would be hazardous.
but I'm sure that your ghoulish
friend Amy has procured a sample of mine.
Amy has every right in the world to loathe you, Tony. The Cancer
campaign was beyond vile.
But you forget what that was in response to. It was not an unprovoked
attack,
Amy had it coming.
Oh *****!
Wrong
Nothing and I repeat nothing warrants >what you said in
regards to her husband's Cancer. Some >things you just don't say.
Why's that? You and your friends have no limits.
You want to accuse someone of digging up things, talk to your pal Amy.
Is Amy starting new threads inquiring >about your last name?
Hey Stupid, she's already done so and even now is requesting more help from
"wizards" to find out info on me.
You owe everything you're getting to >>Amy.
And what am I getting?
Your true self revealed.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
30 May 2004 03:20:50 PM |
|
|
In article <20040530094355.09569.00000124@mb-m11.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
Would you also like a sample of my DNA?
No thanks, I don't want to be >>contaminated;
Contaminated with what? First of all there's nothing wrong with me
that would contaminate you, and secondly are you so stupid that you
think testing a sample of my DNA means *sharing/mixing* my DNA with
yours? Christ, are you an idiot.
No, you;re the idiot, no one mentioned anything about "sharing/mixing",
that's
all in your dense little head.
Errrr.. you said you didn't want to get contaminated by testing my
DNA. If you had even 1/4 of a brain you would know that my DNA would
have to be mixed with yours for you to get contaminated if I had
anything wrong.
Wrong.
Just handling a sample of your DNA would be hazardous.
but I'm sure that your ghoulish
friend Amy has procured a sample of mine.
Amy has every right in the world to loathe you, Tony. The Cancer
campaign was beyond vile.
But you forget what that was in response to. It was not an unprovoked
attack,
Amy had it coming.
Oh *****!
Wrong
Nothing and I repeat nothing warrants >what you said in
regards to her husband's Cancer. Some >things you just don't say.
Why's that? You and your friends have no limits.
You really and truly have no idea that you've crossed a line that everyone else
is perfectly well aware of, aren't you? Incredible...
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
31 May 2004 05:15:08 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
Would you also like a sample of my DNA?
No thanks, I don't want to be >>contaminated;
Contaminated with what? First of all there's nothing wrong with me
that would contaminate you, and secondly are you so stupid that you
think testing a sample of my DNA means *sharing/mixing* my DNA with
yours? Christ, are you an idiot.
No, you;re the idiot, no one mentioned anything about "sharing/mixing",
that's
all in your dense little head.
Errrr.. you said you didn't want to get contaminated by testing my
DNA. If you had even 1/4 of a brain you would know that my DNA would
have to be mixed with yours for you to get contaminated if I had
anything wrong.
Wrong.
Just handling a sample of your DNA would be hazardous.
but I'm sure that your ghoulish
friend Amy has procured a sample of mine.
Amy has every right in the world to loathe you, Tony. The Cancer
campaign was beyond vile.
But you forget what that was in response to. It was not an unprovoked
attack,
Amy had it coming.
Oh *****!
Wrong
Nothing and I repeat nothing warrants >what you said in
regards to her husband's Cancer. Some >things you just don't say.
Why's that? You and your friends have >>no limits.
You really and truly have no idea that >you've crossed a line that everyone
else is perfectly well aware of, aren't >you? Incredible...
Woods
Uh, you obviously haven't followed the entire thing going on here or you would
know that Dani, Amy and Chris have each done worse.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
31 May 2004 02:00:18 PM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040531061508.13157.00000135@mb-m20.aol.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
Would you also like a sample of my DNA?
No thanks, I don't want to be >>contaminated;
Contaminated with what? First of all there's nothing wrong with me
that would contaminate you, and secondly are you so stupid that you
think testing a sample of my DNA means *sharing/mixing* my DNA with
yours? Christ, are you an idiot.
No, you;re the idiot, no one mentioned anything about
"sharing/mixing",
that's
all in your dense little head.
Errrr.. you said you didn't want to get contaminated by testing my
DNA. If you had even 1/4 of a brain you would know that my DNA would
have to be mixed with yours for you to get contaminated if I had
anything wrong.
Wrong.
Just handling a sample of your DNA would be hazardous.
but I'm sure that your ghoulish
friend Amy has procured a sample of mine.
Amy has every right in the world to loathe you, Tony. The Cancer
campaign was beyond vile.
But you forget what that was in response to. It was not an unprovoked
attack,
Amy had it coming.
Oh *****!
Wrong
Nothing and I repeat nothing warrants >what you said in
regards to her husband's Cancer. Some >things you just don't say.
Why's that? You and your friends have >>no limits.
You really and truly have no idea that >you've crossed a line that
everyone
else is perfectly well aware of, aren't >you? Incredible...
Woods
Uh, you obviously haven't followed the entire thing going on here or you
would
know that Dani, Amy and Chris have each done worse.
And of COURSE that makes it OK for you to do what you're doing?!?
Idiot.
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
01 Jun 2004 03:37:20 AM |
|
|
Mark"
wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040531061508.13157.00000135@mb-m20.aol.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
Would you also like a sample of my DNA?
No thanks, I don't want to be >>contaminated;
Contaminated with what? First of all there's nothing wrong with me
that would contaminate you, and secondly are you so stupid that you
think testing a sample of my DNA means *sharing/mixing* my DNA with
yours? Christ, are you an idiot.
No, you;re the idiot, no one mentioned anything about
"sharing/mixing",
that's
all in your dense little head.
Errrr.. you said you didn't want to get contaminated by testing my
DNA. If you had even 1/4 of a brain you would know that my DNA would
have to be mixed with yours for you to get contaminated if I had
anything wrong.
Wrong.
Just handling a sample of your DNA would be hazardous.
but I'm sure that your ghoulish
friend Amy has procured a sample of mine.
Amy has every right in the world to loathe you, Tony. The Cancer
campaign was beyond vile.
But you forget what that was in response to. It was not an unprovoked
attack,
Amy had it coming.
Oh *****!
Wrong
Nothing and I repeat nothing warrants >what you said in
regards to her husband's Cancer. Some >things you just don't say.
Why's that? You and your friends have >>no limits.
You really and truly have no idea that >you've crossed a line that
everyone
else is perfectly well aware of, aren't >you? Incredible...
Woods
Uh, you obviously haven't followed the entire thing going on here or you
would
know that Dani, Amy and Chris have >>each done worse.
And of COURSE that makes it OK for >you to do what you're doing?!?
Duh.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
01 Jun 2004 03:55:10 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040601043720.28253.00000141@mb-m22.aol.com...
Mark"
wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040531061508.13157.00000135@mb-m20.aol.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
Would you also like a sample of my DNA?
No thanks, I don't want to be >>contaminated;
Contaminated with what? First of all there's nothing wrong with
me
that would contaminate you, and secondly are you so stupid that
you
think testing a sample of my DNA means *sharing/mixing* my DNA
with
yours? Christ, are you an idiot.
No, you;re the idiot, no one mentioned anything about
"sharing/mixing",
that's
all in your dense little head.
Errrr.. you said you didn't want to get contaminated by testing my
DNA. If you had even 1/4 of a brain you would know that my DNA
would
have to be mixed with yours for you to get contaminated if I had
anything wrong.
Wrong.
Just handling a sample of your DNA would be hazardous.
but I'm sure that your ghoulish
friend Amy has procured a sample of mine.
Amy has every right in the world to loathe you, Tony. The Cancer
campaign was beyond vile.
But you forget what that was in response to. It was not an
unprovoked
attack,
Amy had it coming.
Oh *****!
Wrong
Nothing and I repeat nothing warrants >what you said in
regards to her husband's Cancer. Some >things you just don't say.
Why's that? You and your friends have >>no limits.
You really and truly have no idea that >you've crossed a line that
everyone
else is perfectly well aware of, aren't >you? Incredible...
Woods
Uh, you obviously haven't followed the entire thing going on here or
you
would
know that Dani, Amy and Chris have >>each done worse.
And of COURSE that makes it OK for >you to do what you're doing?!?
Duh.
Do you still claim to be a christian, Tony?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
01 Jun 2004 11:13:59 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 10:55:10 +0200, "tw" <no@no.com> wrote:
Duh.
Do you still claim to be a christian, Tony?
If he's a Christian, Tom - then he falls right into the category with
Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson. Those "born-agains" really freak me
out. I want nothing to do with that "religion" of theirs. It's built
around utter hypocrisy, preaching, preaching and *more* preaching; the
wildest ideals I've ever heard of living by, and as far as I've seen,
they're fruitcakes. I'm not saying they're all fruitcakes but the
ones I've encountered have been.
They forget all about "The log in your own eye" - "Love your neighbor
as thyself" - "Do not judge lest ye be judged" - "He without sin may
cast the first stone" etc.. All the goodies I learned growing up
Catholic.
Quick story: A born-again fruitcake that my Mum worked with told her
that my Nana wasn't going to Heaven after she died because she died
Catholic and not born-again Christian! I'll never forget that. What
a heartless *****.
Hmmm.. come to think of it - maybe Tony *is* Christian afterall!
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
01 Jun 2004 05:14:42 PM |
|
|
In article <20040601043720.28253.00000141@mb-m22.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Mark"
wrote:
"TonyZ2001" < > wrote in message
news:20040531061508.13157.00000135@mb-m20.aol.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
Would you also like a sample of my DNA?
No thanks, I don't want to be >>contaminated;
Contaminated with what? First of all there's nothing wrong with me
that would contaminate you, and secondly are you so stupid that you
think testing a sample of my DNA means *sharing/mixing* my DNA with
yours? Christ, are you an idiot.
No, you;re the idiot, no one mentioned anything about
"sharing/mixing",
that's
all in your dense little head.
Errrr.. you said you didn't want to get contaminated by testing my
DNA. If you had even 1/4 of a brain you would know that my DNA would
have to be mixed with yours for you to get contaminated if I had
anything wrong.
Wrong.
Just handling a sample of your DNA would be hazardous.
but I'm sure that your ghoulish
friend Amy has procured a sample of mine.
Amy has every right in the world to loathe you, Tony. The Cancer
campaign was beyond vile.
But you forget what that was in response to. It was not an unprovoked
attack,
Amy had it coming.
Oh *****!
Wrong
Nothing and I repeat nothing warrants >what you said in
regards to her husband's Cancer. Some >things you just don't say.
Why's that? You and your friends have >>no limits.
You really and truly have no idea that >you've crossed a line that
everyone
else is perfectly well aware of, aren't >you? Incredible...
Woods
Uh, you obviously haven't followed the entire thing going on here or you
would
know that Dani, Amy and Chris have >>each done worse.
And of COURSE that makes it OK for >you to do what you're doing?!?
Duh.
And this, girls and boys, is why some people need fundie religion. Some people
need to be specifically what they may and may not do - because without being
specifically told, they cannot possibly hope to figure it out on their own.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "bollogs" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
31 May 2004 09:08:25 AM |
|
|
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message news:<20040531061508.13157.00000135@mb-m20.aol.com>...
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
Would you also like a sample of my DNA?
No thanks, I don't want to be >>contaminated;
Contaminated with what? First of all there's nothing wrong with me
that would contaminate you, and secondly are you so stupid that you
think testing a sample of my DNA means *sharing/mixing* my DNA with
yours? Christ, are you an idiot.
No, you;re the idiot, no one mentioned anything about "sharing/mixing",
that's
all in your dense little head.
Errrr.. you said you didn't want to get contaminated by testing my
DNA. If you had even 1/4 of a brain you would know that my DNA would
have to be mixed with yours for you to get contaminated if I had
anything wrong.
Wrong.
Just handling a sample of your DNA would be hazardous.
but I'm sure that your ghoulish
friend Amy has procured a sample of mine.
Amy has every right in the world to loathe you, Tony. The Cancer
campaign was beyond vile.
But you forget what that was in response to. It was not an unprovoked
attack,
Amy had it coming.
Oh *****!
Wrong
Nothing and I repeat nothing warrants >what you said in
regards to her husband's Cancer. Some >things you just don't say.
Why's that? You and your friends have >>no limits.
You really and truly have no idea that >you've crossed a line that everyone
else is perfectly well aware of, aren't >you? Incredible...
Woods
Uh, you obviously haven't followed the entire thing going on here or you would
know that Dani, Amy and Chris have each done worse.
Tony
You're making it worse pantyboy. You really are so stupid that you
can't understand what Woods is saying. She's being nice to you and
trying to explain to you, for your own good, how you look to everyone,
and I mean everyone, on this NG and any others who lurk. People from
all over the world looking at a stupid fat-headed yank waffling on and
on and on about something really really stupid and making a bigger and
bigger ***** of himself for every post he makes.
Reflect for a minute, read all this again, and try to see what Woods
is saying.
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
01 Jun 2004 03:41:23 AM |
|
|
bollogs@hotmail.com (bollogs)
wrote:
You're making it worse
Wrong.
She's being nice to you and
trying to explain to you, for your own >good, how you look to everyone,
Why isn't she being "nice" to you, Dani and Amy?
Reflect for a minute, read all this again, >and try to see what Woods is
saying.
I know exactly what she's saying, but she has never said it to any of your 3,
so it proves her bias.
Now if she had come out and said it to both sides, then I could respect it.
You are nothing but a Terrorist supporting clown; your good friend Mohammar has
turned over a new leaf, so you'd better watch your step, I'm sure he will
reveal the IRA's link to Islmaic Terrorists. In which case you will be a hunted
man.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
02 Jun 2004 04:58:49 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040601044123.28253.00000142@mb-m22.aol.com...
You are nothing but a Terrorist supporting clown; your good friend
Mohammar has
turned over a new leaf, so you'd better watch your step, I'm sure he will
reveal the IRA's link to Islmaic Terrorists. In which case you will be a
hunted
man.
Tony, you REALLY REALLY should lay off the steroids, man. They have screwed
your head completely.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
01 Jun 2004 11:01:38 AM |
|
|
On 01 Jun 2004 08:41:23 GMT, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
bollogs@hotmail.com (bollogs)
wrote:
You're making it worse
Wrong.
She's being nice to you and
trying to explain to you, for your own >good, how you look to everyone,
Why isn't she being "nice" to you, Dani and Amy?
Reflect for a minute, read all this again, >and try to see what Woods is
saying.
I know exactly what she's saying, but she has never said it to any of your 3,
so it proves her bias.
Now if she had come out and said it to both sides, then I could respect it.
You are nothing but a Terrorist supporting clown; your good friend Mohammar has
turned over a new leaf, so you'd better watch your step, I'm sure he will
reveal the IRA's link to Islmaic Terrorists. In which case you will be a hunted
man.
What a lying idiot you are. Do you want to know what this "big bad
terrorist" does? He works his arse off all week and takes care of his
three kids *alone* at any spare moment he has...more so than the
mother of his kids do. It's called a *man* .. how often are you with
your kids, Tony? How much effort do you make to be a part of
everything they do in their lives? Do you know how many *****, dead
beat fathers there are out there?
Are you a father or are you a *Dad*? There is a difference; a huge
difference.
I'm so tired of your slander campaigns. You make me sick.
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
02 Jun 2004 10:37:21 AM |
|
|
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
bollogs@hotmail.com (bollogs)
wrote:
You're making it worse
Wrong.
She's being nice to you and
trying to explain to you, for your own >good, how you look to everyone,
Why isn't she being "nice" to you, Dani and Amy?
Reflect for a minute, read all this again, >and try to see what Woods is
saying.
I know exactly what she's saying, but she has never said it to any of your
3,
so it proves her bias.
Now if she had come out and said it to both sides, then I could respect it.
You are nothing but a Terrorist supporting clown; your good friend Mohammar
has
turned over a new leaf, so you'd better watch your step, I'm sure he will
reveal the IRA's link to Islmaic Terrorists. In which case you will be a
hunted
man.
What a lying idiot you are. Do you want >to know what this "big bad
terrorist" >does?
You're an idiot, the man himself claims to have had meeting with Libyan leader
Mohammar Gaddaffi, Yasser Arafat and other Terrorists, he made a trip into Iraq
during the war (what do you think for?).
He is a member of the IRA which has strong ties to the PLO and other Islamic
Terror groups.
You see only what you want to see.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
31 May 2004 01:39:25 PM |
|
|
Agree...
"bollogs" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a666e2c5.0405310608.3f43ebf@posting.google.com...
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote in message
news:<20040531061508.13157.00000135@mb-m20.aol.com>...
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
Would you also like a sample of my DNA?
No thanks, I don't want to be >>contaminated;
Contaminated with what? First of all there's nothing wrong with me
that would contaminate you, and secondly are you so stupid that you
think testing a sample of my DNA means *sharing/mixing* my DNA with
yours? Christ, are you an idiot.
No, you;re the idiot, no one mentioned anything about
"sharing/mixing",
that's
all in your dense little head.
Errrr.. you said you didn't want to get contaminated by testing my
DNA. If you had even 1/4 of a brain you would know that my DNA would
have to be mixed with yours for you to get contaminated if I had
anything wrong.
Wrong.
Just handling a sample of your DNA would be hazardous.
but I'm sure that your ghoulish
friend Amy has procured a sample of mine.
Amy has every right in the world to loathe you, Tony. The Cancer
campaign was beyond vile.
But you forget what that was in response to. It was not an
unprovoked
attack,
Amy had it coming.
Oh *****!
Wrong
Nothing and I repeat nothing warrants >what you said in
regards to her husband's Cancer. Some >things you just don't say.
Why's that? You and your friends have >>no limits.
You really and truly have no idea that >you've crossed a line that
everyone
else is perfectly well aware of, aren't >you? Incredible...
Woods
Uh, you obviously haven't followed the entire thing going on here or you
would
know that Dani, Amy and Chris have each done worse.
Tony
You're making it worse pantyboy. You really are so stupid that you
can't understand what Woods is saying. She's being nice to you and
trying to explain to you, for your own good, how you look to everyone,
and I mean everyone, on this NG and any others who lurk. People from
all over the world looking at a stupid fat-headed yank waffling on and
on and on about something really really stupid and making a bigger and
bigger ***** of himself for every post he makes.
Reflect for a minute, read all this again, and try to see what Woods
is saying.
WH
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "ig" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
28 May 2004 07:39:39 PM |
|
|
If you don't give it up, it WILL be your future!
Are you my future? LOL!
Get help. Seriously.
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
28 May 2004 09:40:26 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 28 May 2004 17:39:39 -0700, "ig" <i@g.com> wrote:
<fixed top-posting>
Are you my future? LOL!
If you don't give it up, it WILL be your future!
Well he's got 22 years on me so I've got plenty of time.
And why should I be the one to give up? How would you like it if some
***** stole your identity then turned around and blamed it on you?
Talk about adding insult to injury.
I'm sure you wouldn't be pleased either. And don't tell me to be the
"bigger person" - I already am. It's a matter of principle now.
***** what you people call a "flame-war" this isn't *that* ..it's
personal now.
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
29 May 2004 08:27:38 AM |
|
|
Dani
wrote:
"ig" <i@g.com> wrote:
<fixed top-posting>
Are you my future? LOL!
If you don't give it up, it WILL be your >>future!
Well he's got 22 years on me so I've got >plenty of time.
And why should I be the one to give up?
LOL!!!
How would you like it if some
***** stole your identity then turned around and blamed it on you?
Talk about adding insult to injury.
WTF are you talking about Dense One?
I'm sure you wouldn't be pleased either. >And don't tell me to be the "bigger
person" - I already am.
No you;re not, you've been a contaminant to this group since you first came
here.
It's a matter of principle now.
***** what you people call a "flame-war" >this isn't *that* ..it's personal
now.
LOL!!!
This from the tough girl who said that nothing could get to her.
Obviously she lied again.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
28 May 2004 09:07:12 AM |
|
|
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
I mean a while back when Susan said that's what it was,
she denied it, now she posts showing us all a letter she
sent to AOL and she signed it as "Dani Bell".
Inquiring minds want to know.
No, sweetie - I think only *you* want to know. Bell is my
ex-husband's last name.. the name I took when I got married. It's not
my Maiden last name. My Maiden last name is of Irish descent; while
Bell is more of Scottish descent.
Satisfied? Would you also like a sample of my DNA?
Freak.
Dani
Hmmm, if that makes me a freak, what does it make your info hungry pal's, Amy
and Chris?
You 3 really need to wake up and see that you are really pathetic people who
are causing each other grief.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "ig" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
28 May 2004 09:03:31 AM |
|
|
Satisfied? Would you also like a sample of my DNA?
Be careful, he might clone you and use all the clones has his sex slaves.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "jayjbee" |
|
| Title: Re: Is her name really Dani Bell? |
01 Jun 2004 07:10:25 PM |
|
|
Dani wrote:
On 28 May 2004 10:53:50 GMT, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
I mean a while back when Susan said that's what it was,
she denied it, now she posts showing us all a letter she
sent to AOL and she signed it as "Dani Bell".
Inquiring minds want to know.
No, sweetie - I think only *you* want to know. Bell is my
ex-husband's last name.. the name I took when I got married. It's not
my Maiden last name. My Maiden last name is of Irish descent; while
Bell is more of Scottish descent.
Satisfied? Would you also like a sample of my DNA?
Yeah, on the tip of my tongue.
Freak.
You don't know what a freak is. Come and meet me some day.
where did you say you reside? Haven't planed my holydays jet.....
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
