Suppose the Sun is trying to communicate with us by using the sun spots?
How would we know?
.
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Sun a living being? |
18 Feb 2007 03:43:18 AM |
|
|
"Bradly Wiebe" <bradlywiebe@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:45D80F97.A512C7C2@shaw.ca...
mukyuk wrote:
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvinparanoidandroid@hotmail.com> wrote
in
message news:1171742945.993773.208070@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 17, 1:17 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
Suppose the Sun is trying to communicate with us by using the sun
spots?
How would we know?
Is the Sun a 'being'? Depends on your definition of 'being'.
As to whether it's living, it's certainly doesn't appear dead.
What would be it's motivation to 'communicate' with us?
To seek out new life, and new civilizations....
But it's kind of stuck there, it can't boldly go anywhere.
The Sun, they say, is speeding toward the constellation of Hercules at a
speed of nearly 50 miles per second.
And it's already where no man has been before.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Sun a living being? |
17 Feb 2007 12:43:30 PM |
|
|
On Feb 17, 6:17?pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
Suppose the Sun is trying to communicate with us by using the sun spots?
How would we know?
SETI in reverse.
Interesting Mondo.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wally Anglesea™" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Sun a living being? |
17 Feb 2007 05:30:41 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 18:17:54 GMT, "mukyuk" <a@b.com> wrote:
Suppose the Sun is trying to communicate with us by using the sun spots?
Suppose you are an idiot?
How would we know?
Your question would tell us.
--
"FOR I HAVE BECOME VENGEANCE AND YOU WILL FEEL THE WRATH"
"YOUR DOOM IS WRITTEN IN THE STARS...."
"THE DREADED NAME HAS BEEN REVEALED...YOUR DOOM IS NEAR..."
DM in meltdown mode, February 2003
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Sun a living being? |
17 Feb 2007 06:14:39 PM |
|
|
"Wally AngleseaT" <<wanglese@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote in
message news:dv3ft2h21lrpcaaiprdfkddb01p8heq577@4ax.com...
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 18:17:54 GMT, "mukyuk" <a@b.com> wrote:
Suppose the Sun is trying to communicate with us by using the sun spots?
Suppose you are an idiot?
How would we know?
Your question would tell us.
How so?
--
"FOR I HAVE BECOME VENGEANCE AND YOU WILL FEEL THE WRATH"
"YOUR DOOM IS WRITTEN IN THE STARS...."
"THE DREADED NAME HAS BEEN REVEALED...YOUR DOOM IS NEAR..."
DM in meltdown mode, February 2003
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wally Anglesea™" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Sun a living being? |
17 Feb 2007 07:46:30 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 00:14:39 GMT, "mukyuk" <a@b.com> wrote:
"Wally AngleseaT" <<wanglese@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote in
message news:dv3ft2h21lrpcaaiprdfkddb01p8heq577@4ax.com...
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 18:17:54 GMT, "mukyuk" <a@b.com> wrote:
Suppose the Sun is trying to communicate with us by using the sun spots?
Suppose you are an idiot?
How would we know?
Your question would tell us.
How so?
The sun's sunspot cycle is 11 years long between minima and maxima.
So, the sun becomes more talkative every 11 years?
Additionally, each cycle, the rotational aspects of the suns sunspots
switches.
So every 11 years the sun stand on it's head to talk to us?
There are super cycles beyond that, and finally, sunspots are
associated with complex magnetic fields, and the more complex fields
eject CME's when the fields break down.
The Sun is a fusion engine. The reality of how the sun works is far
better than any fantasy.
--
"FOR I HAVE BECOME VENGEANCE AND YOU WILL FEEL THE WRATH"
"YOUR DOOM IS WRITTEN IN THE STARS...."
"THE DREADED NAME HAS BEEN REVEALED...YOUR DOOM IS NEAR..."
DM in meltdown mode, February 2003
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Sun a living being? |
17 Feb 2007 08:50:42 PM |
|
|
"Wally AngleseaT" >
The Sun is a fusion engine. The reality of how the sun works is far
better than any fantasy.
You are WRONG!!!!!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Phoon Hencman" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Sun a living being? |
18 Feb 2007 07:47:06 AM |
|
|
On 2007-02-17 21:50:42 -0500, "mukyuk" <a@b.com> said:
"Wally AngleseaT" >
The Sun is a fusion engine. The reality of how the sun works is far
better than any fantasy.
You are WRONG!!!!!!!
He is RIGHT. Stop trying to wear your ***** as a hat.
The Sun is a ball of hydrogen gas turning it into mainly Helium. It is
a nuclear furnace.
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Sun a living being? |
18 Feb 2007 09:38:17 AM |
|
|
"Phoon Hencman" <Henc@ican.net> wrote in message
news:45d858da$0$28075$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
On 2007-02-17 21:50:42 -0500, "mukyuk" <a@b.com> said:
"Wally AngleseaT" >
The Sun is a fusion engine. The reality of how the sun works is far
better than any fantasy.
You are WRONG!!!!!!!
He is RIGHT. Stop trying to wear your ***** as a hat.
The Sun is a ball of hydrogen gas turning it into mainly Helium. It is a
nuclear furnace.
WRONG!!!! WRONG!!! WRONG!!!. That's just like saying a complicated
computer program is JUST 'ones' and 'zeros'. You cannot summerize something
as HUGE as the Sun into one tiny sentence like that!!! There are many
aspects to the Sun!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Phoon Hencman" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Sun a living being? |
19 Feb 2007 06:02:15 AM |
|
|
On 2007-02-18 10:38:17 -0500, "mukyuk" <a@b.com> said:
"Phoon Hencman" <Henc@ican.net> wrote in message
news:45d858da$0$28075$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
On 2007-02-17 21:50:42 -0500, "mukyuk" <a@b.com> said:
"Wally AngleseaT" >
The Sun is a fusion engine. The reality of how the sun works is far
better than any fantasy.
You are WRONG!!!!!!!
He is RIGHT. Stop trying to wear your ***** as a hat.
The Sun is a ball of hydrogen gas turning it into mainly Helium. It is
a nuclear furnace.
WRONG!!!! WRONG!!! WRONG!!!. That's just like saying a complicated
computer program is JUST 'ones' and 'zeros'. You cannot summerize
something as HUGE as the Sun into one tiny sentence like that!!! There
are many aspects to the Sun!!
Someone buy this nut a clue....
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Chunder" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Sun a living being? |
19 Feb 2007 07:18:23 AM |
|
|
mukyuk wrote:
"Phoon Hencman" <Henc@ican.net> wrote in message
news:45d858da$0$28075$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
On 2007-02-17 21:50:42 -0500, "mukyuk" <a@b.com> said:
"Wally AngleseaT" >
The Sun is a fusion engine. The reality of how the sun works is far
better than any fantasy.
You are WRONG!!!!!!!
He is RIGHT. Stop trying to wear your ***** as a hat.
The Sun is a ball of hydrogen gas turning it into mainly Helium. It is a
nuclear furnace.
WRONG!!!! WRONG!!! WRONG!!!. That's just like saying a complicated
computer program is JUST 'ones' and 'zeros'. You cannot summerize something
as HUGE as the Sun into one tiny sentence like that!!! There are many
aspects to the Sun!!
Now imagine if some nutball suggests a computer might be trying to
tapdance and anyone who says different hasn't considered all the aspects
to computers.
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Sun a living being? |
19 Feb 2007 09:31:48 AM |
|
|
"Cardinal Chunder" <cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in message
news:erc84a07cs@news5.newsguy.com...
mukyuk wrote:
"Phoon Hencman" <Henc@ican.net> wrote in message
news:45d858da$0$28075$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
On 2007-02-17 21:50:42 -0500, "mukyuk" <a@b.com> said:
"Wally AngleseaT" >
The Sun is a fusion engine. The reality of how the sun works is far
better than any fantasy.
You are WRONG!!!!!!!
He is RIGHT. Stop trying to wear your ***** as a hat.
The Sun is a ball of hydrogen gas turning it into mainly Helium. It is a
nuclear furnace.
WRONG!!!! WRONG!!! WRONG!!!. That's just like saying a complicated
computer program is JUST 'ones' and 'zeros'. You cannot summerize
something as HUGE as the Sun into one tiny sentence like that!!! There
are many aspects to the Sun!!
Now imagine if some nutball suggests a computer might be trying to
tapdance and anyone who says different hasn't considered all the aspects
to computers.
They scoffed at Benjemin Franklin too, when he discovered that the earth
went around the Sun.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Chunder" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Sun a living being? |
19 Feb 2007 02:54:54 PM |
|
|
mukyuk wrote:
"Cardinal Chunder" <cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in message
news:erc84a07cs@news5.newsguy.com...
mukyuk wrote:
"Phoon Hencman" <Henc@ican.net> wrote in message
news:45d858da$0$28075$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
On 2007-02-17 21:50:42 -0500, "mukyuk" <a@b.com> said:
"Wally AngleseaT" >
The Sun is a fusion engine. The reality of how the sun works is far
better than any fantasy.
You are WRONG!!!!!!!
He is RIGHT. Stop trying to wear your ***** as a hat.
The Sun is a ball of hydrogen gas turning it into mainly Helium. It is a
nuclear furnace.
WRONG!!!! WRONG!!! WRONG!!!. That's just like saying a complicated
computer program is JUST 'ones' and 'zeros'. You cannot summerize
something as HUGE as the Sun into one tiny sentence like that!!! There
are many aspects to the Sun!!
Now imagine if some nutball suggests a computer might be trying to
tapdance and anyone who says different hasn't considered all the aspects
to computers.
They scoffed at Benjemin Franklin too, when he discovered that the earth
went around the Sun.
I'm going to assume that you're making some kind of clever joke here.
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Sun a living being? |
19 Feb 2007 03:39:33 PM |
|
|
I'm going to assume that you're making some kind of clever joke here.
Oops, I'm sorry, I meant Thomas Edison...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Sun a living being? |
19 Feb 2007 07:56:05 PM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "mukyuk" <a@b.com> Spat the Words
I'm going to assume that you're making some kind of clever joke here.
Oops, I'm sorry, I meant Thomas Edison...
I had to look that one up. I knew it was either Copernicus or
Galileo.. turns out it was a bit of both.
Imagine poor Galileo getting sent to prison for wanting to
learn and explore.
Ah, ya know, we stand on the shoulders of giants.
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Sun a living being? |
19 Feb 2007 08:15:08 PM |
|
|
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns98DCC09DA293Brrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "mukyuk" <a@b.com> Spat the
Words
I'm going to assume that you're making some kind of clever joke here.
Oops, I'm sorry, I meant Thomas Edison...
I had to look that one up. I knew it was either Copernicus or
Galileo.. turns out it was a bit of both.
Imagine poor Galileo getting sent to prison for wanting to
learn and explore.
Ah, ya know, we stand on the shoulders of giants.
Copernicus supposedly came up with the heliocentric model of the solar
system and Galileo invented the refracting telescope. Then Newton and Kepler
worked out the laws of gravitation.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Chunder" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the Sun a living being? |
19 Feb 2007 07:19:23 AM |
|
|
mukyuk wrote:
Suppose the Sun is trying to communicate with us by using the sun spots?
How would we know?
Were you staring at the sun for a few hours before suggesting this?
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
